Books by Katie Jarvis
French History, 2019
Social rights – to food, work, education and health – have been neglected in the recent histories... more Social rights – to food, work, education and health – have been neglected in the recent histories of human rights. Scholars have instead focused on civil and political rights, such as freedom of speech, the abolition of torture and the rights of minorities. When acknowledged, social rights have been portrayed as either generative of authoritarianism or as ‘second generation’ rights – as recent ‘socialist’ additions to core ‘liberal’ rights stretching back to the Enlightenment.
This special issue of French History debunks these interpretations – and historicises them. It shows that the history of social rights pre-date socialism and is not one of linear development but of twists and turns, advances and reversals. Their wide-ranging origins can be found in liberalism, religion, political economy and revolution. Their history
It is precisely because social rights have so many sources of inspiration that their precariousness throughout the modern era is so puzzling. To explain their weak legitimacy, the contributors focus on the problem of obligation, or ‘duties’. Though downplayed in current ‘rights talk’, duties and obligations have been central to struggles over social rights. Who holds the obligation to finance these rights and what is the nature of that obligation? Should social rights be guaranteed by the state or by civil society? Who should have a say in defining and enforcing social rights? And how can social rights be squared with the dictates of a sound political economy?
The essays in this issue show how these questions were answered in France, a country that played a leading role in pioneering human rights in the modern era.
Politics in the Marketplace: Work, Gender, and Citizenship in Revolutionary France (Oxford University Press), 2019
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/politics-in-the-marketplace-9780190917111?cc=us&lang=en&f... more https://global.oup.com/academic/product/politics-in-the-marketplace-9780190917111?cc=us&lang=en&fbclid=IwAR2HgKFaPRIosJjfoHCB92S7wJanYKGuErKCqyxQaO1H-DgXCqGnZrmoezQ#
One of the most dramatic images of the French Revolution is of Parisian market women sloshing through mud and dragging cannons as they marched on Versailles and returned with bread and the king. These market women, the Dames des Halles, sold essential foodstuffs to the residents of the capital but, equally important, through their political and economic engagement, held great revolutionary influence.
Politics in the Marketplace examines how the Dames des Halles invented notions of citizenship through everyday trade. It innovatively interweaves the Dames' political activism and economic practices to reveal how marketplace actors shaped the nature of nascent democracy and capitalism through daily commerce. While haggling over price controls, fair taxes, and acceptable currency, the Dames and their clients negotiated tenuous economic and social contracts in tandem, remaking longstanding Old Regime practices. In this environment, the Dames conceptualized a type of economic citizenship in which individuals' activities such as buying goods, selling food, or paying taxes positioned them within the body politic and enabled them to make claims on the state. They insisted that their work as merchants served society and demanded that the state pass favorable regulations for them in return. In addition, they drew on their patriotic work as activists and their gendered work as republican mothers to compel the state to provide practical currency and assist indigent families. Thus, their notion of citizenship portrayed useful work, rather than gender, as the cornerstone of civic legitimacy.
In this original work, Katie Jarvis challenges the interpretation that the Revolution launched an inherently masculine trajectory for citizenship and reexamines work, gender, and citizenship at the cusp of modern democracy.
Articles and Book chapters by Katie Jarvis
Journal of the Western Society for French History, 2020
French History, 2019
Most studies of socio-economic rights in the French Revolution have focused on how officials an... more Most studies of socio-economic rights in the French Revolution have focused on how officials and other deliverers of aid struggled to redefine assistance, rather than on how recipients themselves contributed to the idea. In contrast, this article centres on poor Parisian market women called the Dames des Halles to bring to light the voices, discourses, and actions of individuals demanding rights and assistance. The Dames had relied on charity and privilege to conduct their commerce during the Old Regime, but the Revolution upended their advantages. Balancing discourses of humanity and utility, the Dames sought to recalibrate their place in the body politic in order to maintain occupational exemptions, favourable commercial positions, and exceptional access to public space. Their battles reveal how everyday citizens and the National Assembly first struggled to reinterpret socio-economic assistance as corrupt privilege, as the state’s civic duty, or as exemptions earned by poor working citizens.
Practiced Citizenship Women, Gender, and the State in Modern France, 2019
Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 2018
French Historical Studies, 2018
In 1793, the National Convention passed two hallmarks of Jacobin legislation: sweeping price cont... more In 1793, the National Convention passed two hallmarks of Jacobin legislation: sweeping price controls called the General Maximum and a ban on women's political clubs. At the center of both issues were factional clashes among the Montagnards, Girondins, and Enragés, on the one hand, and Parisian market women called the Dames des Halles and the leading women's club called the Société des Citoyennes Républicaines Révolutionnaires, on the other. Montagnard deputies pointed to marketplace brawls between the Dames and the club women to argue that women were irrational and had no place in formal politics. Consequently, the dominant historiographical narrative frames their ban as codifying Rousseauian gender norms and ideologically stunting women's citizenship at the outset of French democracy. However, this article analyzes the mechanics of the Maximum to argue that the ban on women's clubs emerged from contests over price controls, market regulation, and the economic dimensions of citizenship itself.
En 1793, la Convention nationale vota deux projets phares de la législation jacobine : la loi du Maximum général sur le contrôle des prix et l'interdiction des clubs politiques féminins. Ces projets se déroulèrent pendant les affrontements entre d'une part les Montagnards, les Girondins et les Enragés, et d'autre part les marchandes parisiennes appelées « Dames des halles » et la Société des citoyennes républicaines révolutionnaires, qui fut alors le principal club féminin. En octobre, les Montagnards dénoncèrent des rixes entre les Dames des halles et les Citoyennes républicaines pour soutenir que les femmes étaient irrationnelles et ne devaient pas participer à la vie politique. Par la suite, l'historiographie considéra que l'interdiction des clubs féminins transcrivit dans la loi les normes de genre rousseauiennes qui avaient cours dans la société et stipulaient que la citoyenneté ne pouvait s'exercer que dans le cadre des institutions politiques, d'où les femmes devaient être exclues. Cependant, cet article analyse le fonctionnement de la loi du Maximum pour soutenir que l'interdiction des clubs féminins fut moins une transcription de normes de genre écartant les femmes de la vie politique, qu'elle n'émergea face aux tensions qui existèrent entre les marchandes et les consommateurs, porteurs de visions contradictoires sur les droits et les devoirs économiques des citoyens. Dès lors, la participation à la vie économique peut être analysée comme un enjeu politique qui révèle des conceptions différentes de la citoyenneté et de la participation à la démocratie.
Journal of Social History, 2018
At the start of the French Revolution, the National Assembly faced two major economic and social ... more At the start of the French Revolution, the National Assembly faced two major economic and social challenges: the staggering debt and a society entrenched in corporate hierarchies. This article examines how, as the deputies overhauled the currency system to shore up state finances, money created unexpected popular inroads to both arenas of reform. In order to quickly emit new paper money called assignats, the deputies first printed bills in denominations too large for retail trade. In response, Parisian merchants formed novel coalitions to protect alternative forms of small change. They joined forces across traditional occupational divisions to evaluate currency and call for practical tokens. In doing so, the retailers influenced the trajectory of national monetary reform from 1790 to 1793. Unable to subdivide large assignats, everyday citizens turned to nascent financial societies for usable tokens. The resulting monetary networks delineated new groups of individuals who required common bill denominations, relied on overlapping systems of credit, and shared confidence in local issuers of promissory notes. Thus, rather than petitioning the state as distinct trade corporations, butter merchants, fish wholesalers, carpenters, and others formed innovative alliances as currency communities. Therefore, this article argues that even before the deputies abolished the guilds in 1791, Parisians reached across the boundaries of corporate society. Merchants continued these diverse associations after 1791 in order to avoid charges of illegal syndicalism. While demanding pocket change, the popular classes reimagined social identities and reordered the corporate world from within between 1789 and 1793.
Gender & History, 2011
... Family Business: Litigation and the Political Economies of Daily Life in Early Modern France ... more ... Family Business: Litigation and the Political Economies of Daily Life in Early Modern France By Julie Hardwick. PENNY ROBERTS. ... More content like this. Find more content: like this article. Find more content written by: PENNY ROBERTS. ...
Genre et classes populaires, research seminar by Katie Jarvis
Book Reviews by Katie Jarvis
Cahiers d'histoire. Revue d'histoire critique, 2018
Dominique Godineau, Les femmes dans la France moderne, XVIe-XVIIIe siècle Paris, Armand Colin, Co... more Dominique Godineau, Les femmes dans la France moderne, XVIe-XVIIIe siècle Paris, Armand Colin, Collection U, 2015, p. 303, 29 €.
Katie Jarvis
Translated by Jérôme Lamy
Papers by Katie Jarvis
The English Historical Review
French History, 2019
Most studies of socio-economic rights in the French Revolution have focused on how officials and ... more Most studies of socio-economic rights in the French Revolution have focused on how officials and other deliverers of aid struggled to redefine assistance, rather than on how recipients themselves contributed to the idea. In contrast, this article centres on poor Parisian market women called the Dames des Halles to bring to light the voices, discourses, and actions of individuals demanding rights and assistance. The Dames had relied on charity and privilege to conduct their commerce during the Old Regime, but the Revolution upended their advantages. Balancing discourses of humanity and utility, the Dames sought to recalibrate their place in the body politic in order to maintain occupational exemptions, favourable commercial positions, and exceptional access to public space. Their battles reveal how everyday citizens and the National Assembly first struggled to reinterpret socio-economic assistance as corrupt privilege, as the state’s civic duty, or as exemptions earned by poor workin...
Politics in the Marketplace, 2019
After the Assembly overhauled the currency system and issued assignats in denominations too large... more After the Assembly overhauled the currency system and issued assignats in denominations too large for retail trade, a small change shortage rocked the nation. To facilitate marketplace exchanges, the Dames, their suppliers, their clients, and other merchants turned to promissory notes. These bills were inadequately backed by local financial societies and contributed to rapid inflation. Beginning in 1790, the lack of practical cash spurred market actors to innovatively ally across guilds and occupational boundaries. Vegetable merchants formed coalitions with carpenters to demand new assignat denominations, retailers joined forces with brokers to protect promissory notes, and clients and merchants rallied to support overlapping credit networks. Thus, the Dames and their allies forged novel socioeconomic associations before the Le Chapelier law and d’Allarde decree legally dismantled the corporate world in 1791. Money thus became a concrete conduit for effecting the core social transfo...
Journal of Social History, 2016
Abstract:At the start of the French Revolution, the National Assembly faced two major economic an... more Abstract:At the start of the French Revolution, the National Assembly faced two major economic and social challenges: the staggering debt and a society entrenched in corporate hierarchies. This article examines how, as the deputies overhauled the currency system to shore up state finances, money created unexpected popular inroads to both arenas of reform. In order to quickly emit new paper money called assignats, the deputies first printed bills in denominations too large for retail trade. In response, Parisian merchants formed novel coalitions to protect alternative forms of small change. They joined forces across traditional occupational divisions to evaluate currency and call for practical tokens. In doing so, the retailers influenced the trajectory of national monetary reform from 1790 to 1793. Unable to subdivide large assignats, everyday citizens turned to nascent financial societies for usable tokens. The resulting monetary networks delineated new groups of individuals who required common bill denominations, relied on overlapping systems of credit, and shared confidence in local issuers of promissory notes. Thus, rather than petitioning the state as distinct trade corporations, butter merchants, fish wholesalers, carpenters, and others formed innovative alliances as currency communities. Therefore, this article argues that even before the deputies abolished the guilds in 1791, Parisians reached across the boundaries of corporate society. Merchants continued these diverse associations after 1791 in order to avoid charges of illegal syndicalism. While demanding pocket change, the popular classes reimagined social identities and reordered the corporate world from within between 1789 and 1793.
French History, 2019
Social rights – to food, work, education and health – have been neglected in the recent histories... more Social rights – to food, work, education and health – have been neglected in the recent histories of human rights. Scholars have instead focused on civil and political rights, such as freedom of speech, the abolition of torture and the rights of minorities. When acknowledged, social rights have been portrayed as either generative of authoritarianism or as ‘second generation’ rights – as recent ‘socialist’ additions to core ‘liberal’ rights stretching back to the Enlightenment. This special issue of French History debunks these interpretations – and historicises them. It shows that the history of social rights pre-date socialism and is not one of linear development but of twists and turns, advances and reversals. Their wide-ranging origins can be found in liberalism, religion, political economy and revolution. Their history It is precisely because social rights have so many sources of inspiration that their precariousness throughout the modern era is so puzzling. To explain their weak legitimacy, the contributors focus on the problem of obligation, or ‘duties’. Though downplayed in current ‘rights talk’, duties and obligations have been central to struggles over social rights. Who holds the obligation to finance these rights and what is the nature of that obligation? Should social rights be guaranteed by the state or by civil society? Who should have a say in defining and enforcing social rights? And how can social rights be squared with the dictates of a sound political economy? The essays in this issue show how these questions were answered in France, a country that played a leading role in pioneering human rights in the modern era.
Annales Historiques De La Revolution Francaise, 2018
Uploads
Books by Katie Jarvis
This special issue of French History debunks these interpretations – and historicises them. It shows that the history of social rights pre-date socialism and is not one of linear development but of twists and turns, advances and reversals. Their wide-ranging origins can be found in liberalism, religion, political economy and revolution. Their history
It is precisely because social rights have so many sources of inspiration that their precariousness throughout the modern era is so puzzling. To explain their weak legitimacy, the contributors focus on the problem of obligation, or ‘duties’. Though downplayed in current ‘rights talk’, duties and obligations have been central to struggles over social rights. Who holds the obligation to finance these rights and what is the nature of that obligation? Should social rights be guaranteed by the state or by civil society? Who should have a say in defining and enforcing social rights? And how can social rights be squared with the dictates of a sound political economy?
The essays in this issue show how these questions were answered in France, a country that played a leading role in pioneering human rights in the modern era.
One of the most dramatic images of the French Revolution is of Parisian market women sloshing through mud and dragging cannons as they marched on Versailles and returned with bread and the king. These market women, the Dames des Halles, sold essential foodstuffs to the residents of the capital but, equally important, through their political and economic engagement, held great revolutionary influence.
Politics in the Marketplace examines how the Dames des Halles invented notions of citizenship through everyday trade. It innovatively interweaves the Dames' political activism and economic practices to reveal how marketplace actors shaped the nature of nascent democracy and capitalism through daily commerce. While haggling over price controls, fair taxes, and acceptable currency, the Dames and their clients negotiated tenuous economic and social contracts in tandem, remaking longstanding Old Regime practices. In this environment, the Dames conceptualized a type of economic citizenship in which individuals' activities such as buying goods, selling food, or paying taxes positioned them within the body politic and enabled them to make claims on the state. They insisted that their work as merchants served society and demanded that the state pass favorable regulations for them in return. In addition, they drew on their patriotic work as activists and their gendered work as republican mothers to compel the state to provide practical currency and assist indigent families. Thus, their notion of citizenship portrayed useful work, rather than gender, as the cornerstone of civic legitimacy.
In this original work, Katie Jarvis challenges the interpretation that the Revolution launched an inherently masculine trajectory for citizenship and reexamines work, gender, and citizenship at the cusp of modern democracy.
Articles and Book chapters by Katie Jarvis
En 1793, la Convention nationale vota deux projets phares de la législation jacobine : la loi du Maximum général sur le contrôle des prix et l'interdiction des clubs politiques féminins. Ces projets se déroulèrent pendant les affrontements entre d'une part les Montagnards, les Girondins et les Enragés, et d'autre part les marchandes parisiennes appelées « Dames des halles » et la Société des citoyennes républicaines révolutionnaires, qui fut alors le principal club féminin. En octobre, les Montagnards dénoncèrent des rixes entre les Dames des halles et les Citoyennes républicaines pour soutenir que les femmes étaient irrationnelles et ne devaient pas participer à la vie politique. Par la suite, l'historiographie considéra que l'interdiction des clubs féminins transcrivit dans la loi les normes de genre rousseauiennes qui avaient cours dans la société et stipulaient que la citoyenneté ne pouvait s'exercer que dans le cadre des institutions politiques, d'où les femmes devaient être exclues. Cependant, cet article analyse le fonctionnement de la loi du Maximum pour soutenir que l'interdiction des clubs féminins fut moins une transcription de normes de genre écartant les femmes de la vie politique, qu'elle n'émergea face aux tensions qui existèrent entre les marchandes et les consommateurs, porteurs de visions contradictoires sur les droits et les devoirs économiques des citoyens. Dès lors, la participation à la vie économique peut être analysée comme un enjeu politique qui révèle des conceptions différentes de la citoyenneté et de la participation à la démocratie.
Genre et classes populaires, research seminar by Katie Jarvis
Book Reviews by Katie Jarvis
Katie Jarvis
Translated by Jérôme Lamy
Papers by Katie Jarvis
This special issue of French History debunks these interpretations – and historicises them. It shows that the history of social rights pre-date socialism and is not one of linear development but of twists and turns, advances and reversals. Their wide-ranging origins can be found in liberalism, religion, political economy and revolution. Their history
It is precisely because social rights have so many sources of inspiration that their precariousness throughout the modern era is so puzzling. To explain their weak legitimacy, the contributors focus on the problem of obligation, or ‘duties’. Though downplayed in current ‘rights talk’, duties and obligations have been central to struggles over social rights. Who holds the obligation to finance these rights and what is the nature of that obligation? Should social rights be guaranteed by the state or by civil society? Who should have a say in defining and enforcing social rights? And how can social rights be squared with the dictates of a sound political economy?
The essays in this issue show how these questions were answered in France, a country that played a leading role in pioneering human rights in the modern era.
One of the most dramatic images of the French Revolution is of Parisian market women sloshing through mud and dragging cannons as they marched on Versailles and returned with bread and the king. These market women, the Dames des Halles, sold essential foodstuffs to the residents of the capital but, equally important, through their political and economic engagement, held great revolutionary influence.
Politics in the Marketplace examines how the Dames des Halles invented notions of citizenship through everyday trade. It innovatively interweaves the Dames' political activism and economic practices to reveal how marketplace actors shaped the nature of nascent democracy and capitalism through daily commerce. While haggling over price controls, fair taxes, and acceptable currency, the Dames and their clients negotiated tenuous economic and social contracts in tandem, remaking longstanding Old Regime practices. In this environment, the Dames conceptualized a type of economic citizenship in which individuals' activities such as buying goods, selling food, or paying taxes positioned them within the body politic and enabled them to make claims on the state. They insisted that their work as merchants served society and demanded that the state pass favorable regulations for them in return. In addition, they drew on their patriotic work as activists and their gendered work as republican mothers to compel the state to provide practical currency and assist indigent families. Thus, their notion of citizenship portrayed useful work, rather than gender, as the cornerstone of civic legitimacy.
In this original work, Katie Jarvis challenges the interpretation that the Revolution launched an inherently masculine trajectory for citizenship and reexamines work, gender, and citizenship at the cusp of modern democracy.
En 1793, la Convention nationale vota deux projets phares de la législation jacobine : la loi du Maximum général sur le contrôle des prix et l'interdiction des clubs politiques féminins. Ces projets se déroulèrent pendant les affrontements entre d'une part les Montagnards, les Girondins et les Enragés, et d'autre part les marchandes parisiennes appelées « Dames des halles » et la Société des citoyennes républicaines révolutionnaires, qui fut alors le principal club féminin. En octobre, les Montagnards dénoncèrent des rixes entre les Dames des halles et les Citoyennes républicaines pour soutenir que les femmes étaient irrationnelles et ne devaient pas participer à la vie politique. Par la suite, l'historiographie considéra que l'interdiction des clubs féminins transcrivit dans la loi les normes de genre rousseauiennes qui avaient cours dans la société et stipulaient que la citoyenneté ne pouvait s'exercer que dans le cadre des institutions politiques, d'où les femmes devaient être exclues. Cependant, cet article analyse le fonctionnement de la loi du Maximum pour soutenir que l'interdiction des clubs féminins fut moins une transcription de normes de genre écartant les femmes de la vie politique, qu'elle n'émergea face aux tensions qui existèrent entre les marchandes et les consommateurs, porteurs de visions contradictoires sur les droits et les devoirs économiques des citoyens. Dès lors, la participation à la vie économique peut être analysée comme un enjeu politique qui révèle des conceptions différentes de la citoyenneté et de la participation à la démocratie.
Katie Jarvis
Translated by Jérôme Lamy