Location via proxy:
[ UP ]
[Report a bug]
[Manage cookies]
No cookies
No scripts
No ads
No referrer
Show this form
Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
mplanchard
5 days ago
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Static search trees: faster than binary search
This is someone’s blog, not an ACM publication. Why hold it to the same standard? They can write in whatever they like. I have a hard time reading Haskell, but I don’t sit and kvetch about it anytime someone wants to use it in a blog post.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: