Discussion
Fri Apr 24
11:53
Michel Marcus: ok for me
COMMENTS
This sequence also gives Fibonacci's congruous (or congruent) numbers (or congrua) divided by 4 with multiplicities, not regarding leg exchange in the underlying primitive Pythagorean triangle. See A258150 and the example. - Wolfdieter Lang, Jun 14 2015
LINKS
Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics, <a href="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CongruumProblem.html">Congruum Problem </a>
Discussion
Fri Apr 24
01:01
Joerg Arndt: IMO yes, you could ask WDL.
01:24
Michel Marcus: I asked him to come and see
06:54
Wolfdieter Lang: I suppose I used Siglers translation of Fibonacci's LQ (BoS). He uses on p. 64 'congruous number' for c in z^2 - y^2 = c = y^2 - x^2 , with integers x, y , z. In Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruum this c is called 'conguum' (plural congrua). In Dickson II , p. 459, uses 'congruent numbers' , and on p. 460 gives Leonardo da Pisa solution for c = 5 but with rational (x, y, z ) = (31/12, 41/12, 49/12).
In my Link I used 'congruent' because it refers to A006991: Primitive congruent numbers. Maybe we use the 'congruous number' or 'congruous numbers' for 'congruum number' or 'congrua numbers' like in A256418 for c with integer (x, y, z). In the example with X =12*x = 31, Y = 12*y = 41 and Z =12*z = 49: Z^2 - Y^2 = 5*12^2 = Y^2 - X^2 the congrrum number is then 5*12^2 = 720 = A256418(10).
Conclusion: I suggest to use 'congruous = congruum number' but not equivalently to 'congruent number'. This is different (more general), at least in MathWorld: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CongruentNumber.html.
07:06
Michel Marcus: so you suggest to write : congruous (or congruum) number ??
11:41
Wolfdieter Lang: Yes Michel, and I add a cf. A256418 (congrua, but without multiple entries, and not only related to primitive PTs like here). Also I add the MathWorld link on congruum.
COMMENTS
This sequence also gives Fibonacci's congruous (or congruent) numbers divided by 4 with multiplicities, not regarding leg exchange in the underlying primitive Pythagorean triangle. See A258150 and the example. - Wolfdieter Lang, Jun 14 2015
Discussion
Thu Apr 16
11:02
Michel Marcus: ok like this then ?
Discussion
Thu Apr 16
10:46
M. F. Hasler: But W.Lang's LINK here also uses "congruent".... In such cases the best may be to say "... xxx (or yyy) ..." and maybe add explanation and/or link(s) to explanation(s).
Discussion
Mon Apr 13
03:16
Jinyuan Wang: ah yes, I compute hem as "congruent"...
03:29
Michel Marcus: but see A258150 comment by Wolfdieter: For the history of this problem, see Dickson, pp. 459-472 (he uses the (misleading) term congruent number).
03:32
Jinyuan Wang: but I don't see differece of congruent and congruous ? maybe after Dickson, we use congruous instead of congruent
Discussion
Mon Apr 13
03:12
Jinyuan Wang: yes right terms, examed