Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Revision History for A024406

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Ordered areas of primitive Pythagorean triangles.
(history; published version)
#42 by Bruno Berselli at Sat Apr 25 02:24:34 EDT 2020
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#41 by Joerg Arndt at Sat Apr 25 01:20:57 EDT 2020
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#40 by Wolfdieter Lang at Fri Apr 24 11:49:13 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Fri Apr 24
11:53
Michel Marcus: ok for me
#39 by Wolfdieter Lang at Fri Apr 24 11:49:01 EDT 2020
COMMENTS

This sequence also gives Fibonacci's congruous (or congruent) numbers (or congrua) divided by 4 with multiplicities, not regarding leg exchange in the underlying primitive Pythagorean triangle. See A258150 and the example. - Wolfdieter Lang, Jun 14 2015

LINKS

Eric Weisstein's World of Mathematics, <a href="https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CongruumProblem.html">Congruum Problem </a>

CROSSREFS
STATUS

proposed

editing

#38 by Michel Marcus at Thu Apr 16 11:02:39 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Fri Apr 24
01:01
Joerg Arndt: IMO yes, you could ask WDL.
01:24
Michel Marcus: I asked him to come and see
06:54
Wolfdieter Lang: I suppose I used Siglers translation of Fibonacci's LQ  (BoS). He uses on p. 64  'congruous number'   for c in z^2 - y^2 = c  = y^2 - x^2 , with integers x, y , z. In  Wikipedia  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruum this c is called 'conguum' (plural congrua). In Dickson  II , p. 459, uses 'congruent numbers' , and on p. 460 gives Leonardo da Pisa solution for c = 5 but with rational (x, y, z ) =  (31/12, 41/12, 49/12).
In my Link I used 'congruent' because it refers to  A006991: Primitive congruent numbers. Maybe we use the 'congruous number'  or 'congruous numbers' for 'congruum number'  or 'congrua numbers'  like in A256418  for c with integer (x, y, z).   In the example with  X =12*x = 31, Y = 12*y = 41 and Z =12*z = 49:   Z^2 - Y^2 = 5*12^2  = Y^2 - X^2  the congrrum number is then 5*12^2 = 720 = A256418(10). 
Conclusion: I suggest to use 'congruous  = congruum  number'  but  not equivalently to 'congruent number'.  This is different (more general), at least in MathWorld: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/CongruentNumber.html.
07:06
Michel Marcus: so you suggest to write : congruous (or congruum) number ??
11:41
Wolfdieter Lang: Yes Michel, and I add a cf. A256418 (congrua, but without multiple entries, and not only related  to primitive  PTs like here). Also I add the MathWorld link on congruum.
#37 by Michel Marcus at Thu Apr 16 11:02:29 EDT 2020
COMMENTS

This sequence also gives Fibonacci's congruous (or congruent) numbers divided by 4 with multiplicities, not regarding leg exchange in the underlying primitive Pythagorean triangle. See A258150 and the example. - Wolfdieter Lang, Jun 14 2015

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Thu Apr 16
11:02
Michel Marcus: ok like this then ?
#36 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Apr 16 10:46:44 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#35 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Apr 16 10:42:53 EDT 2020
FORMULA

a(n) = A121728(n)*A121729(n)/2. - M. F. Hasler, Apr 16 2020

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Thu Apr 16
10:46
M. F. Hasler: But W.Lang's LINK here also uses "congruent".... In such cases the best may be to say "... xxx (or yyy) ..." and maybe add explanation and/or link(s) to explanation(s).
#34 by Jinyuan Wang at Mon Apr 13 03:12:26 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Mon Apr 13
03:16
Jinyuan Wang: ah yes, I compute hem as "congruent"...
03:29
Michel Marcus: but see A258150 comment by Wolfdieter: For the history of this problem, see Dickson, pp. 459-472 (he uses the (misleading) term congruent number).
03:32
Jinyuan Wang: but I don't see differece of congruent and congruous ? maybe after Dickson, we use congruous instead of congruent
#33 by Jinyuan Wang at Mon Apr 13 03:11:11 EDT 2020
CROSSREFS
Discussion
Mon Apr 13
03:12
Jinyuan Wang: yes right terms, examed