Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Revision History for A163626

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Triangle read by rows: The n-th derivative of the logistic function written in terms of y, where y = 1/(1 + exp(-x)).
(history; published version)
#89 by N. J. A. Sloane at Mon May 27 15:31:22 EDT 2024
STATUS

proposed

approved

#88 by Shel Kaphan at Fri May 24 17:22:30 EDT 2024
STATUS

editing

proposed

#87 by Shel Kaphan at Fri May 24 17:20:16 EDT 2024
COMMENTS

The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm applied to a sequence yields the same result as the Stirling-Bernoulli Transform applied to the same sequence. See Philippe Deléham's comment of Nov 05 2011May 26 2015. - Shel Kaphan, May 16 2024

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Fri May 24
17:22
Shel Kaphan: I just changed the date of previous comment that I referred to.  There were two comments by the same person and I had referenced the wrong one previously.
#86 by Shel Kaphan at Thu May 16 16:39:53 EDT 2024
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Thu May 16
16:49
Michel Marcus: so comment does not really apply to this sequence ?
17:13
Shel Kaphan: I would think it applies since according to the previous comment I quoted this sequence effectively defines the Stirling-Bernoulli transform.  I can't imagine another sequence that would be more relevant.
#85 by Shel Kaphan at Thu May 16 16:30:13 EDT 2024
COMMENTS

The Akiyama-Tanigawa algorithm applied to a sequence yields the same result as the Stirling-Bernoulli Transform applied to the same sequence. See Philippe Deléham's comment of Nov 05 2011. - Shel Kaphan, May 16 2024

STATUS

approved

editing

#84 by Alois P. Heinz at Thu May 16 12:28:44 EDT 2024
STATUS

reviewed

approved

#83 by Michel Marcus at Thu May 16 05:14:30 EDT 2024
STATUS

proposed

reviewed

#82 by Shel Kaphan at Tue May 14 22:03:30 EDT 2024
STATUS

editing

proposed

#81 by Shel Kaphan at Tue May 14 22:00:05 EDT 2024
COMMENTS

Row sums for n > 0 are zero. - Shel Kaphan, May 14 2024

STATUS

approved

editing

#80 by Peter Luschny at Tue Aug 10 09:55:27 EDT 2021
STATUS

reviewed

approved