Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Revision History for A216557

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Number of iterations of A216556 until the initial value n appears as a substring of the iterate; 0 if this will never happen.
(history; published version)
#40 by N. J. A. Sloane at Mon Jan 02 12:30:48 EST 2023
LINKS

Eric Angelini, <a href="http://list.seqfan.eu/pipermailoldermail/seqfan/2012-September/010124.html">Strings resurrection</a>, SeqFan mailing list, Sep 08 2012

Discussion
Mon Jan 02
12:30
OEIS Server: https://oeis.org/edit/global/2957
#39 by N. J. A. Sloane at Sun Jan 05 11:41:55 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

approved

#38 by N. J. A. Sloane at Sun Jan 05 11:41:43 EST 2020
COMMENTS

The nonzero a(n) has take only 18 different values: (9, 10, 19, 28, 29, 37, 39, 46, 49, 55, 59, 64, 69, 73, 79, 82, 89, 90). For n < 10^12 the corresponding counts are (108, 75, 829, 388, 306, 326, 302, 289, 291, 277, 303, 265, 315, 254, 327, 245, 339, 2). Specifically a(19) = a(210) = 90.

EXAMPLE

a(111) = 0 since if some number has "111" as its substring, then its preimage for A216556 (cf. A216587) contains at least the substring "00" (e.g., A216587(21110) = 1009), and has in turn no preimage under A216556. Therefore, 111 cannot occur as a substring in the orbit of any number under A216556.

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Sun Jan 05
11:41
N. J. A. Sloane: minor edits
#37 by Lars Blomberg at Fri Jan 03 13:58:01 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#36 by Lars Blomberg at Fri Jan 03 13:56:28 EST 2020
COMMENTS

A216587(0) = -1 but a(101) = 19 because 101 -> 212 -> 323 -> 434 -> 545 -> 656 -> 767 -> 878 -> 989 -> 10910 -> 211021 -> 322132 -> 433243 -> 544354 -> 655465 -> 766576 -> 877687 -> 988798 -> 10998109 -> 21(101)092110 and A216587(11) = -1 but a(2110)=9 because 2110 -> 3221 -> 4332 -> 5443 -> 6554 -> 7665 -> 8776 -> 9887 -> 10998 -> (2110)109 disprove the conjecture.

STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Fri Jan 03
13:57
Lars Blomberg: @M. F. Hasler: Sorry, I misread. Now removed.
#35 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Jan 02 11:01:53 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#34 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Jan 02 11:01:48 EST 2020
EXAMPLE

a(211) = 9 since under the action of A216556, 211 -> 322 -> 433 -> 544 -> 655 -> 766 -> 877 -> 988 -> 1099 -> 211010, which contains the substring 211.

a(111) = 0 since if some number has "111" as its substring, then its preimage for A216556 (cf. A216587) contains at least the substring "00" (e.g., A216587(21110) = 1009), and has in turn no preimage under A216556. Therefore, 111 cannot occur as a substring in the orbit of any number under A216556.

STATUS

proposed

editing

#33 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Jan 02 10:59:43 EST 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

#32 by M. F. Hasler at Thu Jan 02 10:59:39 EST 2020
COMMENTS

Can someone prove (and maybe strengthen) the following conjecture? : a(n) = 0 whenever A216587(m) = -1 for all m obtained by concatenating any digit to the left and any digit to the right of n.

A216587(0) = -1 but a(101) = 19 because 101 -> 212 -> 323 -> 434 -> 545 -> 656 -> 767 -> 878 -> 989 -> 10910 -> 211021 -> 322132 -> 433243 -> 544354 -> 655465 -> 766576 -> 877687 -> 988798 -> 10998109 -> 21(101)092110 and A216587(11) = -1 but a(2110)=9 because 2110 -> 3221 -> 4332 -> 5443 -> 6554 -> 7665 -> 8776 -> 9887 -> 10998 -> (2110)109 disprove the conjecture.

Nonzero terms are becoming increasingly sparse. For k = 1..12 the number of nonzero a(n) for n < 10^k is (10, 92, 247, 489, 797, 1194, 1678, 2236, 2860, 3565, 4359, 5421). (End)

STATUS

reviewed

editing

#31 by Michel Marcus at Thu Jan 02 10:53:50 EST 2020
STATUS

proposed

reviewed