Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Revision History for A239468

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing all changes.
Number of 2-separable partitions of n; see Comments.
(history; published version)
#8 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Jan 28 01:12:00 EST 2022
STATUS

editing

approved

#7 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Jan 28 01:11:58 EST 2022
COMMENTS

Suppose that p is a partition of n into 2 or more parts and that h is a part of p. Then p is (h,0)-separable if there is an ordering x, h, x, h, ..., h, x of the parts of p, where each x represents any part of p except h. Here, the number of h's on the ends of the ordering is 0. Similarly, p is (h,1)-separable if there is an ordering x, h, x, h, ... , , x, h, where the number of h's on the ends is 1; next, p is (h,2)-separable if there is an ordering h, x, h, ... , , x, h. Finally, p is h-separable if it is (h,i)-separable for i = 0,1,2.

EXAMPLE

(2,0)-separable partitions of 7: 421, 12121;

(2,1)-separable partitions of 7: 52;

(2,2)-separable partitions of 7: 232;

2-separable partitions of 7: 421, 12121, 52, 232, so that a(7) = 4.

STATUS

approved

editing

#6 by Bruno Berselli at Fri Mar 21 05:48:54 EDT 2014
STATUS

proposed

approved

#5 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Mar 21 00:01:05 EDT 2014
STATUS

editing

proposed

#4 by Jon E. Schoenfield at Fri Mar 21 00:01:03 EDT 2014
MATHEMATICA

z = 55; t1 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 1] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239467 *)

STATUS

proposed

editing

#3 by Clark Kimberling at Thu Mar 20 17:02:55 EDT 2014
STATUS

editing

proposed

#2 by Clark Kimberling at Thu Mar 20 15:18:24 EDT 2014
NAME

allocated for Clark KimberlingNumber of 2-separable partitions of n; see Comments.

DATA

0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 12, 16, 20, 25, 31, 39, 47, 59, 71, 87, 105, 128, 153, 185, 221, 265, 315, 377, 445, 530, 625, 739, 870, 1025, 1201, 1411, 1649, 1930, 2249, 2625, 3050, 3549, 4116, 4773, 5523, 6391, 7375, 8515, 9806, 11293, 12980, 14917, 17110

OFFSET

1,5

COMMENTS

Suppose that p is a partition of n into 2 or more parts and that h is a part of p. Then p is (h,0)-separable if there is an ordering x, h, x, h, ..., h, x of the parts of p, where each x represents any part of p except h. Here, the number of h's on the ends of the ordering is 0. Similarly, p is (h,1)-separable if there is an ordering x, h, x, h, ... , x, h, where the number of h's on the ends is 1; next, p is (h,2)-separable if there is an ordering h, x, h, ... , x, h. Finally, p is h-separable if it is (h,i)-separable for i = 0,1,2.

EXAMPLE

(2,0)-separable partitions of 7: 421, 12121

(2,1)-separable partitions of 7: 52

(2,2)-separable partitions of 7: 232

2-separable partitions of 7: 421, 12121, 52, 232, so that a(7) = 4.

MATHEMATICA

z = 55; t1 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 1] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239467 *)

t2 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 2] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239468 *)

t3 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 3] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239469 *)

t4 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 4] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239470 *)

t5 = -1 + Table[Count[IntegerPartitions[n], p_ /; Length[p] - 1 <= 2 Count[p, 5] <= Length[p] + 1], {n, 1, z}] (* A239472 *)

CROSSREFS
KEYWORD

allocated

nonn,easy

AUTHOR

Clark Kimberling, Mar 20 2014

STATUS

approved

editing

#1 by Clark Kimberling at Wed Mar 19 15:38:52 EDT 2014
NAME

allocated for Clark Kimberling

KEYWORD

allocated

STATUS

approved