Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Revision History for A318114

(Bold, blue-underlined text is an addition; faded, red-underlined text is a deletion.)

Showing entries 1-10 | older changes
Number of compositions of n into exactly n nonnegative parts <= six.
(history; published version)
#16 by N. J. A. Sloane at Wed Oct 06 14:29:58 EDT 2021
FORMULA

The sequence b(n) := [x^n] ( F(x)/F(-x) )^n, where F(x) = (x^7 - 1)/(x - 1), may satisfy the stronger supercongruences congruences b(p) == 2 (mod p^3) for prime p > 7 (checked up to p = 499). (End)

Discussion
Wed Oct 06
14:29
OEIS Server: https://oeis.org/edit/global/2915
#15 by Alois P. Heinz at Fri Apr 03 14:12:04 EDT 2020
STATUS

proposed

approved

#14 by Peter Bala at Fri Apr 03 04:01:47 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Fri Apr 03
14:11
Alois P. Heinz: ok ...
#13 by Peter Bala at Fri Apr 03 04:00:51 EDT 2020
FORMULA

a(n) = Sum_{i=0..n/7} (-1)^i*C(n,i)*C(2*n-7*i-1,n-7*i). - Vladimir Kruchinin, Mar 28 2019 [corrected by Peter Bala, Mar 31 2020]

a(n) = Sum_{i=0..n/7} (-1)^i*C(n,i)*C(2*n-7*i-1,n-7*i).

a(p) == 1 (mod p^2) for any prime p > 7.

a(p) == 1 (mod p^2) for any prime p > 7 (from Kruchnin's formula above). More generally, we may have a(p^k) == a(p^(k-1)) (mod p^(2*k)) for k >= 2 and any prime p.

Discussion
Fri Apr 03
04:01
Peter Bala: I got confused.
#12 by Alois P. Heinz at Thu Apr 02 20:53:10 EDT 2020
STATUS

proposed

editing

Discussion
Thu Apr 02
21:07
Alois P. Heinz: Vladimir entered his formula in  A187925 and there it is correct.   So he did not enter an incorrect formula which is what you suggest here.  .... which is not ok.
#11 by Peter Bala at Thu Apr 02 05:35:19 EDT 2020
STATUS

editing

proposed

Discussion
Thu Apr 02
06:20
Michel Marcus: I don't see where Vladimir formula comes from ??
08:07
Peter Bala: From a(n) = [x^n] ((x^7 - 1)/(x - 1))^n: expand the numerator  (x^7 - 1)^n and the denominator  (x-1)^(-n)  using the binomial theorem and then extract the coefficient of the x^n term.
20:53
Alois P. Heinz: There was no Vladimir formula in this page before, and of course no incorrect formula.  You cannot enter an incorrect formula and then try to correct it.
#10 by Peter Bala at Tue Mar 31 10:16:08 EDT 2020
FORMULA

a(n) = Sum_{i=0..n/57} (-1)^i*C(n,i)*C(2*n-57*i-1,n-57*i). - Vladimir Kruchinin, Mar 28 2019 [corrected by _Peter Bala_, Mar 31 2020]

a(n) = Sum_{k = 0..floor(n/7)} (-1)^k*C(n,k)*C(2*n-7*k-1,n-7*k).

a(p) == 1 (mod p^2) for any prime p > 7 (from Kruchnin's formula above). More generally, we may have a(p^k) == a(p^(k-1)) (mod p^(2*k)) for k >= 2 and any prime p.

#9 by Peter Bala at Tue Mar 31 09:54:47 EDT 2020
FORMULA

a(n) = Sum_{i=0..n/5} (-1)^i*C(n,i)*C(2*n-5*i-1,n-5*i). - Vladimir Kruchinin, Mar 28 2019

From Peter Bala, Mar 31 2020: (Start)

a(n) = Sum_{k = 0..floor(n/7)} (-1)^k*C(n,k)*C(2*n-7*k-1,n-7*k).

a(p) == 1 (mod p^2) for any prime p > 7. More generally, we may have a(p^k) == a(p^(k-1)) (mod p^(2*k)) for k >= 2 and any prime p.

The sequence b(n) := [x^n] ( F(x)/F(-x) )^n, where F(x) = (x^7 - 1)/(x - 1), may satisfy the stronger supercongruences b(p) == 2 (mod p^3) for prime p > 7 (checked up to p = 499). (End)

STATUS

approved

editing

#8 by Alois P. Heinz at Sat Aug 18 20:05:50 EDT 2018
STATUS

editing

approved

#7 by Alois P. Heinz at Sat Aug 18 20:05:48 EDT 2018
LINKS

Alois P. Heinz, <a href="/A318114/b318114.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 0..1675</a>