proposed

approved

editing

proposed

Although in principle A276086 moves any n out of the "all hope gonelost" zone A100716 (where A328308 is always zero), back to its compelement complement A048103, by comparing the ratio of this and A328309 it can be seen (see the Plot2-link in the Links-section) that such a transfer actually lessens the chances that by just iterating A003415 one could reach zero from there, maybe because A276086 also often transfers its argument to much higher regions, where such chances (of reaching zero) are generally smaller? . Note also how the effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

Cf. A003415, A048103, A100716, A276086, A327969, A328306, A328308, A328309.

Although in principle A276086 moves any n out of the "all hope gone" zone A100716 (where A328308 is always zero), back to its compelement A048103, by comparing the ratio of this and A328309 it can be seen (see the Plot2-link) that such a transfer actually lessens the chances that by just iterating A003415 one could reach zero from there. , maybe because A276086 also often transfers its argument to much higher regions, where such chances (of reaching zero) are generally smaller? Note also how the effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

Cf. A003415, A048103, A100716, A276086, A327969, A328306, A328308.

Although in principle A276086 moves any n out of the "all hope gone" zone A100716 (where A328308 is always zero), back to A048103, by comparing the ratio of this and A328309 it can be seen (see the Plot2-link) that such a transfer actually lessens the changes chances that by just iterating A003415 one could reach zero from there. Note also how the effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

Although in principle A276086 moves any n out of the "all hope gone" zone A100716 (where A328308 is always zero), back to A048103, by comparing the ratio of this and A328309 it can be seen (see the Plot2-link) that without such a transfer, actually lessens the changes that by just iterating A003415 one could reach zero from there. Note also how the effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

The effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

The effect of the primorial base representation can be clearly seen in the folds and warps of that plot.

Although in principle A276086 moves any n out of the "all hope gone" zone A100716 (where A328308 is always zero), back to A048103, by comparing the ratio of this and A328309 it can be seen that without such a transfer, there

Cf. A003415, A048103, A100716, A276086, A328306, A328308.

<a href="https://oeis.org/plot2a?name1=A328309&amp;name2=A328307&amp;tform1=untransformed&amp;tform2=untransformed&amp;shift=0&amp;radiop1=ratio&amp;drawpoints=true">Ratio of A328309(n)/A328307(n) plotted with OEIS Plot2-script</a>

Antti Karttunen, <a href="/A328307/b328307.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 0..65537</a>

For all a(0) = 1; for n >= 0, a(A328116(n)) = a(n-1) + A328306(n).

For all n >= 0, a(A328116(n)) = n.