"Nick Nesbitt's Reading Capital’s Materialist Dialectic is a major contribution to the literature on Spinozist Marxism, to our understanding of the stakes of Althusser's theoretical intervention, and to debates about rationalist epistemology more generally. Theoretically daring and impeccably written, it offers a substantial and important reinterpretation of Marx's dialectical method in Capital." Nathan Brown, Concordia University, author of Rationalist Empiricism
Paper presented at : "Wondering about Materialism," Warsaw, 7.11.22. In what follows, I wish to a... more Paper presented at : "Wondering about Materialism," Warsaw, 7.11.22. In what follows, I wish to argue that in the Spinozist readings of Marx and Capital by Althusser and especially Pierre Macherey we find an encompassing and compelling reconceptualization of the notion of materialist critique. Althusser and Macherey develop the proposition of a materialism without reference to matter, following Spinoza’s critique of the imaginary and ideology, as the science of causes and their necessary effects. I will proceed in three moments: first, to indicate the grounds on which Althusser and Macherey reject all matter-based, monist materialisms; second, to describe the countervailing Spinozist position they propose, as the apodictic science of causes and necessary effects; and, third, briefly to indicate how this position indicates a reading of Marx’s revisions of Capital from 1867-1872, as the objective displacement or suppression of Hegel’s idealist, negation- based logic of contradiction [Widerspruch] and determinations of reflection [Reflexionsbistimmungen] with a Spinozist logic of what I will call additive synthesis.
Pierre Macherey and the Case of Literary Production, Warren Montag and Audrey Wasser, eds., 2022
I argue in what follows that the achievement of Macherey's A Theory of Literary Production is far... more I argue in what follows that the achievement of Macherey's A Theory of Literary Production is far more sweeping than the analysis of a handful of classic novels; Macherey, in this, his first book, in point of fact puts forward a generic protocol for the properly materialist analysis of textual, symbolic objects of all types, a fully and compellingly original (Spinozist) analytical practice for the critique of discourse as such.
I wish here to argue that Badiou has, in the three volumes of Being and Event, in fact produced t... more I wish here to argue that Badiou has, in the three volumes of Being and Event, in fact produced the materials for a logic of the capitalist social form, but as an arsenal of concepts that remain to be precisely measured against Marx’s critical and formal reproduction of capitalism. In what follows, I will proceed in two moments, the first critical, the second comparative. Badiou’s disinterest in the logic of capitalism and Marx’s Capital specifically takes on a strongly symptomatic, spectral presence in the 1994–1995 seminar recently translated to English as Lacan: Anti-philosophy. Secondly, while it is true that Logics of Worlds never discusses the logic of appearance that governs all capitalist things (i.e., commodities), we should nonetheless read Logics in a quite specific sense as the (objective, likely unintentional) abstract translation and formalization of Marx’s Capital. In this view, Capital should quite simply be read as the sys- tematic demonstration of the logic of what Marx calls the capitalist social form, which is to say in Badiou’s jargon, as the logic of the appearance of things in the capitalist world.
The Price of Slavery analyzes Marx’s critique of capitalist slavery and its implications for the ... more The Price of Slavery analyzes Marx’s critique of capitalist slavery and its implications for the Caribbean thought of Toussaint Louverture, Henry Christophe, C. L. R. James, Aimé Césaire, Jacques Stephen Alexis, and Suzanne Césaire. Nick Nesbitt assesses the limitations of the literature on capitalism and slavery since Eric Williams in light of Marx’s key concept of the social forms of labor, wealth, and value. To do so, Nesbitt systematically reconstructs for the first time Marx’s analysis of capitalist slavery across the three volumes of Capital. The book then follows the legacy of Caribbean critique in its reflections on the social forms of labor, servitude, and freedom, as they culminate in the vehement call for the revolutionary transformation of an unjust colonial order into one of universal justice and equality.
https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5724
In the brief space of this discussion, I want to focus on the crucial dimension of the book of pa... more In the brief space of this discussion, I want to focus on the crucial dimension of the book of particular interest to me, its elaboration of the Althusserian reading of Marx's Capital. Here I wish to push back against Nathan Brown's repeated-and repeatedly suggestive invocations of empiricism, to propose that Rationalist Empiricism repeats a gesture that invites further demonstration. These imposing readings in each case culminate in the determination of a novel theoretical concept that the book nonetheless hesitates to name; in each case instead problematically reiterating the concept of empiricism. This reiteration of empiricism marks a puzzling and persistent reappearance at these heights of theoretical sophistication: of a dualism of subject and object, of the concrete and the immaterial, of phenomenon and noumenon. Instead, this concept Rationalist Empiricism constructs, yet hesitates to name, I would call a Rationalist Materialism. https://syndicate.network/symposia/literature/rationalist-empiricism/
The writings of Maryse Conde are critical to their core. Her novels dismantle the pieties of ever... more The writings of Maryse Conde are critical to their core. Her novels dismantle the pieties of everyday life to look at what lies underneath: the fragile narcissism of subjects who erect facades of ideology and self-importance around the naked core of their being to ward off ever-impinging ...
"Nick Nesbitt's Reading Capital’s Materialist Dialectic is a major contribution to the literature on Spinozist Marxism, to our understanding of the stakes of Althusser's theoretical intervention, and to debates about rationalist epistemology more generally. Theoretically daring and impeccably written, it offers a substantial and important reinterpretation of Marx's dialectical method in Capital." Nathan Brown, Concordia University, author of Rationalist Empiricism
Paper presented at : "Wondering about Materialism," Warsaw, 7.11.22. In what follows, I wish to a... more Paper presented at : "Wondering about Materialism," Warsaw, 7.11.22. In what follows, I wish to argue that in the Spinozist readings of Marx and Capital by Althusser and especially Pierre Macherey we find an encompassing and compelling reconceptualization of the notion of materialist critique. Althusser and Macherey develop the proposition of a materialism without reference to matter, following Spinoza’s critique of the imaginary and ideology, as the science of causes and their necessary effects. I will proceed in three moments: first, to indicate the grounds on which Althusser and Macherey reject all matter-based, monist materialisms; second, to describe the countervailing Spinozist position they propose, as the apodictic science of causes and necessary effects; and, third, briefly to indicate how this position indicates a reading of Marx’s revisions of Capital from 1867-1872, as the objective displacement or suppression of Hegel’s idealist, negation- based logic of contradiction [Widerspruch] and determinations of reflection [Reflexionsbistimmungen] with a Spinozist logic of what I will call additive synthesis.
Pierre Macherey and the Case of Literary Production, Warren Montag and Audrey Wasser, eds., 2022
I argue in what follows that the achievement of Macherey's A Theory of Literary Production is far... more I argue in what follows that the achievement of Macherey's A Theory of Literary Production is far more sweeping than the analysis of a handful of classic novels; Macherey, in this, his first book, in point of fact puts forward a generic protocol for the properly materialist analysis of textual, symbolic objects of all types, a fully and compellingly original (Spinozist) analytical practice for the critique of discourse as such.
I wish here to argue that Badiou has, in the three volumes of Being and Event, in fact produced t... more I wish here to argue that Badiou has, in the three volumes of Being and Event, in fact produced the materials for a logic of the capitalist social form, but as an arsenal of concepts that remain to be precisely measured against Marx’s critical and formal reproduction of capitalism. In what follows, I will proceed in two moments, the first critical, the second comparative. Badiou’s disinterest in the logic of capitalism and Marx’s Capital specifically takes on a strongly symptomatic, spectral presence in the 1994–1995 seminar recently translated to English as Lacan: Anti-philosophy. Secondly, while it is true that Logics of Worlds never discusses the logic of appearance that governs all capitalist things (i.e., commodities), we should nonetheless read Logics in a quite specific sense as the (objective, likely unintentional) abstract translation and formalization of Marx’s Capital. In this view, Capital should quite simply be read as the sys- tematic demonstration of the logic of what Marx calls the capitalist social form, which is to say in Badiou’s jargon, as the logic of the appearance of things in the capitalist world.
The Price of Slavery analyzes Marx’s critique of capitalist slavery and its implications for the ... more The Price of Slavery analyzes Marx’s critique of capitalist slavery and its implications for the Caribbean thought of Toussaint Louverture, Henry Christophe, C. L. R. James, Aimé Césaire, Jacques Stephen Alexis, and Suzanne Césaire. Nick Nesbitt assesses the limitations of the literature on capitalism and slavery since Eric Williams in light of Marx’s key concept of the social forms of labor, wealth, and value. To do so, Nesbitt systematically reconstructs for the first time Marx’s analysis of capitalist slavery across the three volumes of Capital. The book then follows the legacy of Caribbean critique in its reflections on the social forms of labor, servitude, and freedom, as they culminate in the vehement call for the revolutionary transformation of an unjust colonial order into one of universal justice and equality.
https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5724
In the brief space of this discussion, I want to focus on the crucial dimension of the book of pa... more In the brief space of this discussion, I want to focus on the crucial dimension of the book of particular interest to me, its elaboration of the Althusserian reading of Marx's Capital. Here I wish to push back against Nathan Brown's repeated-and repeatedly suggestive invocations of empiricism, to propose that Rationalist Empiricism repeats a gesture that invites further demonstration. These imposing readings in each case culminate in the determination of a novel theoretical concept that the book nonetheless hesitates to name; in each case instead problematically reiterating the concept of empiricism. This reiteration of empiricism marks a puzzling and persistent reappearance at these heights of theoretical sophistication: of a dualism of subject and object, of the concrete and the immaterial, of phenomenon and noumenon. Instead, this concept Rationalist Empiricism constructs, yet hesitates to name, I would call a Rationalist Materialism. https://syndicate.network/symposia/literature/rationalist-empiricism/
The writings of Maryse Conde are critical to their core. Her novels dismantle the pieties of ever... more The writings of Maryse Conde are critical to their core. Her novels dismantle the pieties of everyday life to look at what lies underneath: the fragile narcissism of subjects who erect facades of ideology and self-importance around the naked core of their being to ward off ever-impinging ...
Talk presented at 'Music After Schoenberg,' Prague, September 24, 2019
Spinoza, unlike Descartes... more Talk presented at 'Music After Schoenberg,' Prague, September 24, 2019
Spinoza, unlike Descartes, seems to have had no demonstrable interest in music. In his complete works, including the correspondence, the word ‘music’ appears only six times, never more than in passing or from biblical citation. Nonetheless, I want to propose that the Spinozist epistemology, and in particular his famous distinction between three genres of understanding, can help us make sense of the complex nature of John Coltrane’s music specifically, and (though I won’t be able to develop this assertion) of jazz and composed concert music more generally. It is immediately clear that Coltrane’s music, no less than that of Messiaen or Pierre Boulez, engages a resolutely conceptual understanding of musical practice, one which, moreover, tirelessly pursues a musical grasp of the absolute. In this talk, I propose, following Spinoza, to divide the knowledge of the (Coltranian) musical object into three types or genres (E II, P 40, Sch. 2). If each of these genres has its element of truth, we nonetheless cannot affirm that they are all adequate to the understanding of this music...
Talk presented at the conference 'Dialectic Returns' in Prague, September 12, 2019. Pierre Macher... more Talk presented at the conference 'Dialectic Returns' in Prague, September 12, 2019. Pierre Macherey's magnificent 1979 book Hegel ou Spinoza-which was only belatedly translated into English in 2011-might more properly be retitled Macherey Reading Hegel Misreading Spinoza. This retitling would point to the very singular nature of the book's undertaking: Macherey does not ask us to choose between Hegel or Spinoza, between a true or false philosophy, any more than between a right or wrong reading of Spinoza. Rather, Macherey here productively redeploys the concept of a symptomatic reading forged by his mentor, Louis Althusser, in Althusser's contribution to the famous 1965 volume Reading Capital. At stake for Macherey, in truly Spinozist fashion, is not the truth or falsity of Hegel's reading of Spinoza, but its inadequacy to the Spinozist text, as well as, at least as importantly, the necessity of this misreading to enable the constitution of Hegel's own philosophical system. Hegel, Macherey argues, must necessarily misread Spinoza, repeatedly in the most blatant, spectacularly mischaracterized fashion, and Hegel's Spinoza precisely constitutes a symptom in the sense of a refusal to think the specific form of a dialectic that Spinoza leads us toward, a dialectic without subject, teleology, or negation. This misreading, Macherey shows, takes the uncanny form of repeatedly misrepresenting Spinoza's thought regarding the very questions on which they most closely coincide: Hegel declares himself furthest from Spinozism exactly on the point [regarding the nature of truth] at which the two doctrines appear to coincide.… To demonstrate the insufficiency of the Spinozist doctrine, Hegel imputes to it a certain number of philosophical positions that are not Spinoza's, that Spinoza has even expressly rejected.… Hegel confronts Spinoza with an argument that strongly resembles one that Spinoza developed against the Cartesians: he has thus replied in advance to the objections raised by Hegel…. (2011: 72)
Interview with Folha de São Paolo on the new book (The Concept in Crisis: Reading Capital Today [... more Interview with Folha de São Paolo on the new book (The Concept in Crisis: Reading Capital Today [Duke]) and reading Marx today.
Althusser Today: In Defense of Theoreticism
Talk presented at roundtable with Alain Badiou and Br... more Althusser Today: In Defense of Theoreticism Talk presented at roundtable with Alain Badiou and Bruno Bosteels, Princeton University, 12.2. 2016
Caribbean Critique seeks to define and analyze the distinctive contribution of francophone Caribb... more Caribbean Critique seeks to define and analyze the distinctive contribution of francophone Caribbean thinkers to perimetric Critical Theory. The book argues that their singular project has been to forge a brand of critique that, while borrowing from North Atlantic predecessors such as Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, and Sartre, was from the start indelibly marked by the Middle Passage, slavery, and colonialism. Chapters and sections address figures such as Toussaint Louverture, Baron de Vastey, Victor Schoelcher, Aimé Césaire, René Ménil, Frantz Fanon, Maryse Condé, and Edouard Glissant, while an extensive theoretical introduction defines the essential parameters of 'Caribbean Critique.'
Review of Marlene Daut, Baron de Vastey and the Origins of Black Atlantic Humanism. (The New Urba... more Review of Marlene Daut, Baron de Vastey and the Origins of Black Atlantic Humanism. (The New Urban Atlantic.) London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. xxxix þ 244 pp., ill. in French Studies 73:3, 503-4.
Uploads
Papers by Nick Nesbitt
Download the free Open Access PDF of the book at
https://brill.com/display/title/65062?language=en
"Nick Nesbitt's Reading Capital’s Materialist Dialectic is a major contribution to the literature on Spinozist Marxism, to our understanding of the stakes of Althusser's theoretical intervention, and to debates about rationalist epistemology more generally. Theoretically daring and impeccably written, it offers a substantial and important reinterpretation of Marx's dialectical method in Capital." Nathan Brown, Concordia University, author of Rationalist Empiricism
https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5724
https://syndicate.network/symposia/literature/rationalist-empiricism/
Download the free Open Access PDF of the book at
https://brill.com/display/title/65062?language=en
"Nick Nesbitt's Reading Capital’s Materialist Dialectic is a major contribution to the literature on Spinozist Marxism, to our understanding of the stakes of Althusser's theoretical intervention, and to debates about rationalist epistemology more generally. Theoretically daring and impeccably written, it offers a substantial and important reinterpretation of Marx's dialectical method in Capital." Nathan Brown, Concordia University, author of Rationalist Empiricism
https://www.upress.virginia.edu/title/5724
https://syndicate.network/symposia/literature/rationalist-empiricism/
Spinoza, unlike Descartes, seems to have had no demonstrable interest in music. In his complete works, including the correspondence, the word ‘music’ appears only six times, never more than in passing or from biblical citation. Nonetheless, I want to propose that the Spinozist epistemology, and in particular his famous distinction between three genres of understanding, can help us make sense of the complex nature of John Coltrane’s music specifically, and (though I won’t be able to develop this assertion) of jazz and composed concert music more generally. It is immediately clear that Coltrane’s music, no less than that of Messiaen or Pierre Boulez, engages a resolutely conceptual understanding of musical practice, one which, moreover, tirelessly pursues a musical grasp of the absolute. In this talk, I propose, following Spinoza, to divide the knowledge of the (Coltranian) musical object into three types or genres (E II, P 40, Sch. 2). If each of these genres has its element of truth, we nonetheless cannot affirm that they are all adequate to the understanding of this music...
Talk presented at roundtable with Alain Badiou and Bruno Bosteels, Princeton University,
12.2. 2016