Robert S Emmett
Roanoke College, Environmental Studies, Faculty Member
Multi, Inter-, Transdisciplinary are perennial topics in our attempts to address environmental challenges. How do we actually work together across our disciplinary borders? What are the promises and pitfalls of such work?
Research Interests:
The “Four Theses” has become a primary text for understanding the problematic nature of the Anthropocene as a cultural category, one that describes a collective, if unintended, human project whose implications extend far beyond geological... more
The “Four Theses” has become a primary text for understanding the problematic nature
of the Anthropocene as a cultural category, one that describes a collective, if unintended,
human project whose implications extend far beyond geological inquiries
about stratigraphic dating. Even as geologists continue to debate whether the Earth
has indeed departed the Holocene, and if so, when, Chakrabarty has articulated what
is at stake for our perception of human agency as a species when the timescales of human
history become entangled in geological epochs. Reflecting on his “Four Theses”
involves re-casting if not radically transforming the meaning of history and the purpose
of humanities research in the age of global warming.
of the Anthropocene as a cultural category, one that describes a collective, if unintended,
human project whose implications extend far beyond geological inquiries
about stratigraphic dating. Even as geologists continue to debate whether the Earth
has indeed departed the Holocene, and if so, when, Chakrabarty has articulated what
is at stake for our perception of human agency as a species when the timescales of human
history become entangled in geological epochs. Reflecting on his “Four Theses”
involves re-casting if not radically transforming the meaning of history and the purpose
of humanities research in the age of global warming.
Research Interests:
The emergence of the environmental humanities presents a unique opportunity for scholarship to tackle the human dimensions of the environmental crisis. It might finally allow such work to attain the critical mass it needs to break out of... more
The emergence of the environmental humanities presents a unique opportunity for scholarship to tackle the human dimensions of the environmental crisis. It might finally allow such work to attain the critical mass it needs to break out of customary disciplinary confines and reach a wider public, at a time when natural scientists have begun to acknowledge that an understanding of the environmental crisis must include insights from the humanities and social sciences. In order to realize this potential, scholars in the environmental humanities need to map the common ground on which close interdisciplinary cooperation will be possible. This essay takes up this task with regard to two fields that have embraced the environmental humanities with particular fervour, namely ecocriticism and environmental history. After outlining an ideal of slow scholarship which cultivates thinking across different spatiotemporal scales and seeks to sustain meaningful public debate, the essay argues that both ecocriticism and environmental history are concerned with practices of environing: each studies the material and symbolic transformations by which " the environment " is configured as a space for human action. Three areas of research are singled out as offering promising models for cooperation between ecocriticism and environmental history: eco-historicism, environmental justice, and new materialism. Bringing the fruits of such efforts to a wider audience will require environmental humanities scholars to experiment with new ways of organizing and disseminating knowledge.