SciRate- arXiv.org
- Geophysics
- General Physics
- Optics
- Physics and Society
- Computational Physics
- Medical Physics
- History and Philosophy of Physics
- Space Physics
- Instrumentation and Detectors
- Fluid Dynamics
- Atomic Physics
- Chemical Physics
- Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
- Applied Physics
- Plasma Physics
- Atomic and Molecular Clusters
- Biological Physics
- Classical Physics
- Accelerator Physics
- Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability
- Physics Education
- Popular Physics
- Metric Geometry
- Algebraic Geometry
- Number Theory
- Spectral Theory
- Quantum Algebra
- Differential Geometry
- Combinatorics
- Numerical Analysis
- Complex Variables
- Representation Theory
- Classical Analysis and ODEs
- History and Overview
- Probability
- Logic
- Information Theory
- Optimization and Control
- Dynamical Systems
- Functional Analysis
- Category Theory
- Analysis of PDEs
- Rings and Algebras
- General Topology
- Commutative Algebra
- Geometric Topology
- Mathematical Physics
- K-Theory and Homology
- Statistics Theory
- Operator Algebras
- Group Theory
- General Mathematics
- Algebraic Topology
- Symplectic Geometry
- Computational Complexity
- Computation and Language
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Data Structures and Algorithms
- Multiagent Systems
- Discrete Mathematics
- Mathematical Software
- Machine Learning
- Numerical Analysis
- Multimedia
- Sound
- Social and Information Networks
- Graphics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Computers and Society
- Robotics
- Systems and Control
- Information Theory
- Other Computer Science
- Software Engineering
- Information Retrieval
- Computer Science and Game Theory
- Databases
- Formal Languages and Automata Theory
- Emerging Technologies
- Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
- Cryptography and Security
- Networking and Internet Architecture
- Logic in Computer Science
- Performance
- Operating Systems
- Neural and Evolutionary Computing
- Human-Computer Interaction
- General Literature
- Computational Geometry
- Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science
- Hardware Architecture
- Programming Languages
- Digital Libraries
- Symbolic Computation
Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)
- Miguel Fuentes, Juan Pablo Cárdenas, Gastón Olivares, Eric Rasmussen, Carolina Urbina, Soledad Salazar, Gerardo VidalNov 13 2024 physics.soc-ph arXiv:2411.08015v1Resilience in social systems is crucial for mitigating the impacts of crises, such as climate change, which poses an existential threat to communities globally. As disasters become more frequent and severe, enhancing community resilience has become imperative. This study introduces a cutting-edge framework, quantitative network-based modeling called Complex Analysis for Socio-environmental Adaptation (CASA) to evaluate and strengthen social resilience. CASA transforms resilience models' linear and static structure into a complex network that integrates complexity and systems thinking, utilizing global scientific knowledge and complex network methodologies. The resulting resilience framework features rich interdependencies, and subsequent dimensionality reduction produces robust resilience indicators. This innovative application of network sciences is then demonstrated by quantitatively assessing what are known as "Sacrifice Zones," socio-environmentally sensitive areas. Results unveil the potential of this novel application of complex network methodologies as tools for systemic diagnostics, identifying vulnerabilities, and guiding policies and practices to enhance climate resilience and adaptation. The CASA framework represents a pioneering tool for assessing territorial resilience, leveraging network science applications, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence. CASA serves as a systemic diagnostic tool for urban resilience and a guide for policymakers, urban planners, and other professionals to promote sustainable, healthy cities in an era of climate change.
- Nov 13 2024 cs.SI physics.soc-ph arXiv:2411.07907v1How does social network structure amplify or stifle behavior diffusion? Existing theory suggests that when social reinforcement makes the adoption of behavior more likely, it should spread more -- both farther and faster -- on clustered networks with redundant ties. Conversely, if adoption does not benefit from social reinforcement, then it should spread more on random networks without such redundancies. We develop a novel model of behavior diffusion with tunable probabilistic adoption and social reinforcement parameters to systematically evaluate the conditions under which clustered networks better spread a behavior compared to random networks. Using both simulations and analytical techniques we find precise boundaries in the parameter space where either network type outperforms the other or performs equally. We find that in most cases, random networks spread a behavior equally as far or farther compared to clustered networks despite strong social reinforcement. While there are regions in which clustered networks better diffuse contagions with social reinforcement, this only holds when the diffusion process approaches that of a deterministic threshold model and does not hold for all socially reinforced behaviors more generally. At best, clustered networks only outperform random networks by at least a five percent margin in 18\% of the parameter space, and when social reinforcement is large relative to the baseline probability of adoption.
- Energy considerations can significantly affect the behavior of a population of energy-consuming agents with limited energy budgets, for instance, in the movement process of people in a city. We consider a population of interacting agents with an initial energy budget walking on a graph according to an exploration and return (to home) strategy that is based on the current energy of the person. Each move reduces the available energy depending on the flow of movements and the strength of interactions, and the movement ends when an agent returns home with a negative energy. We observe that a uniform distribution of initial energy budgets results in a larger number of visited sites per consumed energy (efficiency) compared to case that all agents have the same initial energy if return to home is relevant from the beginning of the process. The uniform energy distribution also reduces the amount of uncertainties in the total travel times (entropy production) which is more pronounced when the strength of interactions and exploration play the relevant role in the movement process. That is variability in the energies can help to increase the efficiency and reduce the entropy production specially in presence of strong interactions.
- Nov 13 2024 physics.soc-ph nlin.AO arXiv:2411.07323v1Understanding how individuals' beliefs and attitudes evolve within a population is crucial for explaining social phenomena such as polarization and consensus formation. We explore a persuasive arguments model incorporating confirmation bias, where individuals preferentially accept information aligning with their existing beliefs. By employing a mean-field approach, widely used in statistical physics, we simplify complex processes of argument exchange within the population. Our analysis proceeds by projecting the model onto continuous opinion dynamics and further reducing it through mean-field reasoning. The findings highlight the robustness of mean-field predictions and their compatibility with agent-based simulations, capturing the transition from consensus to polarization induced by confirmation bias.
Recent comments
...(continued)While I would never want to antagonize my peers or to allow myself to assume they were acting irrationally, I do share your concerns to an extent. I worry about the association of social justice and inclusivity with linguistic engineering, virtual lynching, censorship, etc. (the latter phenomena sta
...(continued)I think you are just complaining about issues that arise from living with other people in the same society. If you disagree with their values, well, then some of them might have a negative opinion about you. If you express yourself in an aggressive way, and use words like "lynch" to mean having pe
...(continued)I agree with Noon that the discussion is becoming largely off topic for SciRate, but that it might still be of interest to the community to discuss this. I invite people to post thoughtful and respectful comments over at [my earlier Quantum Pontiff post][1]. Further comments here on SciRate will be
I've moderated a few comments on this post because I believe it has gone past useful discussion, and I'll continue to remove comments that I believe don't add anything of substantial value.
Thanks.
...(continued)The problem with your argument is that no one is forcing anyone to say anything, or banning anything.
If the terms really were offensive or exclusionary or had other bad side effects, then it's reasonable to discuss as a community whether to keep them, and possibly decide to stop using them. Ther
Fair enough. At the end of the day I think most of us are concerned with the strength of the result not the particular language used to describe it.
...(continued)But how obvious is ancilla? To me it is not even remotely obvious (nor clear as a term, but as the literature used it so much, I see such word in much the same way as I see auxiliary, in fact - now if you want to take offense with auxiliary, what can I say? I won't invent words just to please you).
...(continued)I don't think science can or should avoid the perpetuation of existing "historical unequal social order" by changing the language, as to me it seems that, if you try hard enough you can find problem with anything you want to be offended at - rationalizations are tricky things you can often get carri
...(continued)I am not sure if the ArXiv is the best venue for this kind of paper/rant. Also, I’m concerned that so much energy is being put into the discussion. As a non-native speaker, I might not get all nuances of the language, but I have a hard time understanding why we should drop a scientific jargon like “
-
Supported by
Braneshop, and
the US National Science Foundation.