The Great Limestone Temple is one of the most important monuments in Sarmizegetusa Regia. Identified already in the first years of the field research coordinated by C. Daicoviciu, the temple was excavated during a few decades and was... more
The Great Limestone Temple is one of the most important monuments in Sarmizegetusa Regia. Identified already in the first years of the field research coordinated by C. Daicoviciu, the temple was excavated during a few decades and was heavily affected by the so called “restoration” works undertaken in Grădiștea de Munte, in the 1980s. The data referring to the monument is spread in many reports, papers, book chapters, architectural blueprints and topographical surveys, and the partial results of the research, sometimes inconclusive, generated divergent views. Reorganizing all the information coming from the excavation records, including the drawings, this paper is proposing a new building sequence of the temple, taking into account all the existing data, some of it until now unpublished.
The archaeological research undertaken at Sarmizegetusa in time has indicated or discovered a number of plinths, drums and bases of andesite columns. Several reconstruction hypotheses are proposed for the architecture of the Great... more
The archaeological research undertaken at Sarmizegetusa in time has indicated or discovered a number of plinths, drums and bases of andesite columns. Several reconstruction hypotheses are proposed for the architecture of the Great Andesite Temple, the Small Rectangular Temple and the Large Rectangular Temple, based on the analysis of these architectural elements preserved in situ, in a secondary position or reused in Roman buildings. In the end an important archaeological discovery in the area of Orăștie Mountains is presented, a bronze square with markings (lines and dots) preserved on its arms, which indicate precisely the measurement unit used at the Dacian monuments at Sarmizegetusa Regia.
Research Interests:
Twelve rectangular wall enclosures were identified in the Alburnus Maior site, of which six can be reconstructed, being in a better state of preservation. Four precincts enclose small funerary areas covered by an earthen mound, each one... more
Twelve rectangular wall enclosures were identified in the Alburnus Maior site, of which six can be reconstructed, being in a better state of preservation. Four precincts enclose small funerary areas covered by an earthen mound, each one designed for a single grave. Two of the larger enclosures describe funerary areas comprising the grave and the commemorative monument. This study analyses their architectural image and presents preliminary data on the built environment of three of the enclosures from the Hop-Găuri Necropolis.
Research Interests:
L’étude est consacrée aux modifications de nature constructive des ensembles des Portes Ouest et Nord qui ont été soumise à la recherche archéologique. Sont mises en évidence la succession des phases d’édification en vertu d’une... more
L’étude est consacrée aux modifications de nature constructive des ensembles des Portes Ouest et Nord qui ont été soumise à la recherche archéologique. Sont mises en évidence la succession des phases d’édification en vertu d’une chronologie surtout relative. Il est proposé une hypothèse sur les procédées géométriques d’entamer le dessin de la Porte Ouest, plus précisément que le projet de la Porte Ouest soit une transformation du projet de la Porte d’Arcadie de Messène.
Research Interests:
The area of Dobruja has revealed, in most late fortresses, examples of rectangular towers remarkable both for their large dimensions and for their interior load-bearing structure represented by massive masonry pillars. The present study... more
The area of Dobruja has revealed, in most late fortresses, examples of rectangular towers remarkable both for their large dimensions and for their interior load-bearing structure represented by massive masonry pillars. The present study proposes for this particular type of defensive architecture the function of artillery battery. Th e implications that this hypothesis has on the conception of the local and zonal
defensive system are examined. In the second part of the study a reconstruction proposition is made for this special type of defensive element.
defensive system are examined. In the second part of the study a reconstruction proposition is made for this special type of defensive element.
Research Interests:
The Hellenistic enclosure of Histria (the west side) was discovered in 1950 and the results of research were published in 1966. From that moment on, it didn’t make the object of any further research. Th e defective perception of the... more
The Hellenistic enclosure of Histria (the west side) was discovered in 1950 and the results of research were published in 1966. From that moment on, it didn’t make the object of any further research. Th e defective perception of the foundation system of the so-called “sewage complex” resulted in insufficient research and documentation of the monument, with implications on the interpretation of the functionality of the whole. Th e present contribution advances a new interpretation of the ensemble named up until now the “sewage complex”. Its “troughs” are, within the present hypothesis, the imprints of a horizontal wood beam grid which played the role of a raft foundation. An important implication of this hypothesis is that the surface defi ned by the imprints
of the wood grid raft foundation represents in fact the trace of a gate tower, unidentifi ed until now. Th us, the gate of the Hellenistic enclosure was fl anked by two rectangular towers, of which the south one identifi ed during the 1951-1954 excavations and the north one reconstructed here by means of fresh interpretation of archaeological evidence.
of the wood grid raft foundation represents in fact the trace of a gate tower, unidentifi ed until now. Th us, the gate of the Hellenistic enclosure was fl anked by two rectangular towers, of which the south one identifi ed during the 1951-1954 excavations and the north one reconstructed here by means of fresh interpretation of archaeological evidence.
Research Interests:
Dans ce qui suit sont analysés quatre blocs massifs en calcaire dont on peut présumer qu’ils faisaient partie de la façade de la Grande Porte de la cité romaine tardive Histria. On met en discussion une hypothèse de reconstitution de la... more
Dans ce qui suit sont analysés quatre blocs massifs en calcaire dont on peut présumer qu’ils faisaient partie de la façade de la Grande Porte de la cité romaine tardive Histria. On met en discussion une hypothèse de reconstitution de la façade de cet ensemble, dans la phase de réfection de celle-ci, en soulignant que le type de symbiose dans la structure de la façade des composantes architecturales analysées est en accord avec les possibilités de reconstitution du niveau du sol antique correspondant au premier niveau de défense de la Grande Porte et peut être harmonisée avec les niveaux des défense
des courtines et des tours. En même temps on observe une particularité de composition de la façade qui permet de surprendre la nature géométrique du projet appliqué à l’ensemble de la Grande Porte.
des courtines et des tours. En même temps on observe une particularité de composition de la façade qui permet de surprendre la nature géométrique du projet appliqué à l’ensemble de la Grande Porte.