Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
Why does the notion of imposter syndrome persists in higher education, who acknowledges feelings of imposterism, and how does imposter phenomenon affect work practices? The inquiry is framed empirically through participant narratives from... more
Why does the notion of imposter syndrome persists in higher education, who acknowledges feelings of imposterism, and how does imposter phenomenon affect work practices? The inquiry is framed empirically through participant narratives from an ‘insider’ research study carried out in a research-intensive university in Australia exploring relationships at the so-called teaching-research nexus. Critical auto-ethnographic reflections  influenced by Archers’ notion of reflexivity are included. A playful adoption of mythic archetypes suggests that imposterism is better viewed as agile, malleable or mercurial tendencies, where feelings, position the ‘imposter’ in a diversity of liminal spaces, thereby, creating a critical awareness of strategies for academic staff.
Language lies at the heart of cultural identity. Prior to colonisation in 1788, there were more than 250 Indigenous Australian languages in Australia (Walsh, 1993; Walsh, Marmion, & Troy, 2014). Up until the late nineteenth and early... more
Language lies at the heart of cultural identity. Prior to colonisation in 1788, there were more than 250 Indigenous Australian languages in Australia (Walsh, 1993; Walsh, Marmion, & Troy, 2014). Up until the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, prohibitions were in place that banned most Aboriginal people from speaking their own languages (Maier, 2010; Reid, 2010). Many of the “sleeping”1 pre-contact languages are undergoing revitalisation (Hobson et al., 2010), a process that requires respectful action and acknowledgement of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people’s deep connection to the cultural, philosophical and spiritual concepts of land and land tenure. In 2016, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) made this declaration:
It is through language that we communicate with the world, define our identity, express our history and culture, learn, defend our human rights and participate in all aspects of society, to name but a few. Through language, people preserve their community’s history, customs and traditions, memory, unique modes of thinking, meaning and expression. They also use it to construct their future. (UNESCO, 2016)
To highlight the importance of Indigenous languages in strengthening the position of Indigenous cultures on a global scale, UNESCO declared 2019 the year of Indigenous languages. At the University of Sydney, like institutions in other parts of Australia, we are recognising our responsibility to acknowledge and preserve Aboriginal Australia’s heritage. At the local level, the focus on Indigenous languages on our campuses provides opportunities to connect the higher education community with Indigenous culture. We offer these connections to Indigenous language through the creation of interdisciplinary collaborations across the arts and the sciences, spanning linguistics, botany, art and museum studies. The University grounds cover urban areas (inner-city and suburban) and regional areas across Australia (e.g. Broken Hill, Lismore, Dubbo, Orange, Camden, Nowley and Narrabri). The “Sydney Language” is the language of the Gadigal people, the traditional custodians of the University of Sydney’s main inner-city campus. The Sydney Language, spoken for tens of thousands of years pre-colonisation, is in revival, and the survival of this language is a proactive declaration of the strong living presence of the Gadigal people in the University’s community.
Effectively incorporating cultural competence into tertiary institutions is paramount to the creation of cross-cultural settings where undergraduates and academics can develop understandings of how culture and belief systems influence... more
Effectively incorporating cultural competence into tertiary institutions is paramount to the creation of cross-cultural settings where undergraduates and academics can develop understandings of how culture and belief systems influence professional decision making. Processes that incorporate cultural competence are viewed as particularly challenging in science disciplines, particularly non-vocational science disciplines where “western” or reductivist ways of teaching and “doing” science remain dominant.
Lewis, M., Lodge, J., & Quinnell, R. (2018). Refocusing threshold concepts: Surfacing and attending to student misconceptions as a necessary (& safer) form of liminal learning. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher... more
Lewis, M., Lodge, J., & Quinnell, R. (2018). Refocusing threshold concepts: Surfacing and attending to student misconceptions as a necessary (& safer) form of liminal learning. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 4, pp. 31 - 47): Emerald Publisher.

If the core purpose of transformative education is to challenge and reposition knowledge, through a range of opportunities, then surfacing and attending to forms of student misconceptions (for example, through confusion, disequilibrium) are a necessary part of learning and teaching. We have come to understand that to arrive at a clear view of a concept may involve a process of working through a range of misconceptions about a phenomena or experience that may or may not create a threshold experience in a learner. We argue that the journey through such forms misconceptions and thresholds all require a more nuanced emphasis on liminal spaces, where misconceptions and thresholds may reside. We offer a revised thresholds concept generic model that helps to identify student misconceptions as cycles within and through pre‐liminal, liminal and post‐liminal spaces.
Two practice examples demonstrate the application of this model; (1) teaching and learning botanical literacy through a technology‐rich, real‐time mobile App; and (2) embedding and measuring cultural competence as a graduate learning outcome in Australian universities. Each context offers a specific emphasis on highlighting the need to make all liminal learning spaces safer, as students surface and engage with the misconceptions. We conclude by suggesting that misconceptions in student learning offer a form of threshold in their own right ‐ forms of threshold misconceptions.