Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

    P. Vöhringer

    Despite decades of effort, psychiatry still lacks a reliable biological marker to distinguish the 2 depressive disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), whose phenomenology can be extremely similar. There... more
    Despite decades of effort, psychiatry still lacks a reliable biological marker to distinguish the 2 depressive disorders, major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD), whose phenomenology can be extremely similar. There remain 2 commonly held assumptions about these 2 disorders. The first assumption is that MDD and BD are clear-cut and easily separable diagnostic conditions, requiring only careful assessment to distinguish. The second assumption is that there is no true difference in the clinical phenomenology of unipolar depression (UD) versus bipolar depression, and that, at least in the midst of a depressive episode, the 2 disorders cannot be distinguished. Unfortunately , both assumptions likely oversimplify the evidence base and tend to inhibit rigorous investigation by introducing biased assessment. The oft-cited observation
    Research Interests:
    Objective: to develop a predictive model to evaluate the factors that modify the access to treatment for Postpartum Depression (PPD). Methods: prospective study with mothers who participated in the monitoring of child health in primary... more
    Objective: to develop a predictive model to evaluate the factors that modify the access to treatment for Postpartum Depression (PPD). Methods: prospective study with mothers who participated in the monitoring of child health in primary care centers. For the initial assessment and during 3 months, it was considered: sociodemographic data, gyneco-obstetric data, data on the services provided, depressive symptoms according to the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) and quality of life according to the Short Form-36 Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36). The diagnosis of depression was made based on MINI. Mothers diagnosed with PPD in the initial evaluation, were followed-up. Results: a statistical model was constructed to determine the factors that prevented access to treatment, which consisted of: item 2 of EPDS (OR 0.43, 95%CI: 0.20-0.93) and item 5 (OR 0.48, 95%CI: 0.21-1.09), and previous history of depression treatment (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.61-1.06). Area under the ROC curve for the model=0.79; p-value for the Hosmer-Lemershow=0.73. Conclusion: it was elaborated a simple, well standardized and accurate profile, which advises that nurses should pay attention to those mothers diagnosed with PPD, presenting low/no anhedonia (item 2 of EPDS), scarce/no panic/fear (item 5 of EPDS), and no history of depression, as it is likely that these women do not initiate treatment.
    Research Interests:
    Background: Although evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean suggests that depression can be effectively treated in primary care settings, depression management remains unevenly performed. This systematic review evaluates all the... more
    Background: Although evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean suggests that depression can be effectively treated in primary care settings, depression management remains unevenly performed. This systematic review evaluates all the international evidence on healthcare team training programs aimed at improving the outcomes of patients with depression. Methods: Three databases were searched for articles in English or Spanish indexed up to November 20, 2014. Studies were included if they fulfilled the following conditions: clinical trials, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews; and if they evaluated a training or educational program intended to improve the management of depression by primary healthcare teams, and assessed change in depressive symptoms, diagnosis or response rates, referral rates, patients' satisfaction and/or quality of life, and the effectiveness of treatments. Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review. Five trials tested the effectiveness of multi-component interventions (training included), and the remaining studies evaluated the effectiveness of specific training programs for depression management. All the studies that implemented multi-component interventions were efficacious, and half of the training trials were shown to be effective. Limitations: Contribution of training programs alone to the effectiveness of multi-component interventions is yet to be established. The lack of specificity regarding health providers' characteristics might be a confounding factor. Conclusions: The review conducted suggests that stand-alone training programs are less effective than multi-component interventions. In applying the evidence gathered from developed countries to Latin America and the Caribbean, these training programs must consider and address local conditions of mental health systems, and therefore multi-component interventions may be warranted.
    Research Interests: