Megan Peters
University of California, Riverside, Bioengineering, Faculty Member
- Brown University, Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, UndergraduateUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Psychology, Post-Docadd
- Psychology, Visual Studies, Cognitive Science, Cognitive Psychology, Neuropsychology, Cognitive Neuropsychology, and 18 moreComputational Modeling, Perception (Psychology), Sampling in human cognition, Philosophy, Social Sciences, Technology, Phenomenology, Metacognition, Phenomenological Psychology, Psychology of Unconscious, Cognitive Neuroscience, Perception, Computational Modelling, Computational Neuroscience, Vision Science, Perceptual Learning, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, and Computer Scienceedit
Many believe that humans can 'perceive unconsciously' -- that for weak stimuli, briefly presented and masked, above-chance discrimination is possible without awareness. Interestingly, an online survey reveals that most experts in the... more
Many believe that humans can 'perceive unconsciously' -- that for weak stimuli, briefly presented and masked, above-chance discrimination is possible without awareness. Interestingly, an online survey reveals that most experts in the field recognize the lack of convincing evidence for this phenomenon, and yet they persist in this belief. Using a recently-developed bias-free experimental procedure for measuring subjective introspection (confidence), we found no evidence for unconscious perception; participants' behavior matched that of a Bayesian ideal observer, even though the stimuli were visually masked. This surprising finding suggests that the thresholds for subjective awareness and objective discrimination are effectively the same: if objective task performance is above chance, there is likely conscious experience. These findings shed new light on decades-old methodological issues regarding what it takes to consider a neurobiological or behavioral effect to be 'unconscious,' and provide a platform for rigorously investigating unconscious perception in future studies.
Research Interests:
We explore the application of volumetric reconstruction from structured-light sensors in cognitive neuroscience, specifically in the quantification of the size-weight illusion, whereby humans tend to systematically perceive smaller... more
We explore the application of volumetric reconstruction from structured-light sensors in cognitive neuroscience, specifically in the quantification of the size-weight illusion, whereby humans tend to systematically perceive smaller objects as heavier. We investigate the performance of two commercial structured-light scanning systems in comparison to one we developed specifically for this application. Our method has two main distinct features: First, it only samples a sparse series of viewpoints, unlike other systems such as the Kinect Fusion. Second, instead of building a distance field for the purpose of points-to-surface conversion directly, we pursue a first-order approach: the distance function is recovered from its gradient by a screened Poisson reconstruction, which is very resilient to noise and yet preserves high-frequency signal components. Our experiments show that the quality of metric reconstruction from structured light sensors is subject to systematic biases, and highlights the factors that influence it. Our main performance index rates estimates of volume (a proxy of size), for which we review a well-known formula applicable to incomplete meshes. Our code and data will be made publicly available upon completion of the anonymous review process.