Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
    To assess if attendance to a preoperative counseling program improved weight loss or adherence to treatment guidelines in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. One-hundred-forty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine... more
    To assess if attendance to a preoperative counseling program improved weight loss or adherence to treatment guidelines in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. One-hundred-forty-one patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine percent chose to participate in the counseling groups. They were randomized to a Treatment group and a Control group. Thirty-one percent chose not to participate in the counseling. However, they gave their consent to assessment before and after surgery (Reference group). One year after bariatric surgery, 88% had a weight loss of ≥ 50% EWL, 37% reported more than 30 min of physical activity daily, 74% had 5-7 meals daily, and 87% took recommended vitamins. There were no differences in weight loss, eating habits, or physical exercise between the Treatment group, the Control group and the Reference group one year after surgery. Preoperative group counseling did not increase treatment adherence to recommended life-style changes. In accordance with findings in the present study, it is not reasonable to offer a preoperative counseling program for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Further research should focus on developing and evaluating programs for postsurgical follow-up, and identifying patients that are in need for more comprehensive treatment programs.
    The present study examined prevalence of psychiatric disorders before and 1 year after weight loss surgery. Furthermore, we studied if level of pre-operative shame could be a maintaining factor for psychiatric disorders at 1-year... more
    The present study examined prevalence of psychiatric disorders before and 1 year after weight loss surgery. Furthermore, we studied if level of pre-operative shame could be a maintaining factor for psychiatric disorders at 1-year follow-up. One-hundred and twenty-seven patients (F/M: 94/33) with mean body mass index (BMI) ± standard deviation (s) =45.3±5.2 kg/m(2) and mean age 41.3±10.3 years participated in the study. Eighty-seven patients met for follow-up 1 year after surgery. Psychiatric disorders were assessed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) and the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-II). Levels of depression, anxiety and shame were assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Internalized Shame Scale (ISS). Sixty-one patients (48%) at pre-operative assessment and 16 patients (18%) at 1-year follow-up had a comorbid psychiatric disorder. The strongest predictor of post-operative psychiatric disorder was pre-operative psychiatric disorder, odds ratio of 27.7 (95% CI for EXP (B) 3.2-239.8, P =0.003). Pre-operative level of shame (higher than 50-point ISS score) was also a significant predictor for post-operative psychiatric disorders, odds ratio of 9.1 (95% CI for EXP (B) 1.8-44.4, P =0.007). There was a significant reduction in prevalence of psychiatric disorders from pre-operative assessment to follow-up 1 year after surgery. Level of shame at pre-operative assessment was associated with maintenance of psychiatric problems. This finding is of clinical importance, since psychiatric disorders persisting after bariatric surgery have strong impact on the course of weight loss and quality of life.
    Background Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. Aims To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment... more
    Background Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. Aims To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme compared with placebo-controlled mirtazapine medication in patients with chronic fatigue, and to study the effect of combined medication and CCBT. Method A three-armed randomised clinical trial of mirtazapine, placebo and a CCBT programme was conducted to investigate treatment effect in a patient group (n=72) with chronic fatigue referred to a specialist clinic. The CCBT programme was compared with mirtazapine or placebo therapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks treatment with a mixed crossover-combination design. Assessments were done at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. Results By 12 weeks the treatment effect was significantly better in the group initially receiving CCBT, as assessed with the Fatigue Scale (P=0.014) and the Clinical Global Impr...
    ... ved daværende leder Bjarte Stubhaug og i Medisinsk fagavdeling i Legeforeningens sekretariat ved daværende fagdirektør Hans Asbjørn Holm. ... Molde & Kristiansund Jostein Bergsagel... more
    ... ved daværende leder Bjarte Stubhaug og i Medisinsk fagavdeling i Legeforeningens sekretariat ved daværende fagdirektør Hans Asbjørn Holm. ... Molde & Kristiansund Jostein Bergsagel Jostein.Bergsagel@helsenr.no 14 St Olavs Hospital HF, Trondheim Tiller DPS, poliklinikk ...
    Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme... more
    Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme compared with placebo-controlled mirtazapine medication in patients with chronic fatigue, and to study the effect of combined medication and CCBT. A three-armed randomised clinical trial of mirtazapine, placebo and a CCBT programme was conducted to investigate treatment effect in a patient group (n=72) with chronic fatigue referred to a specialist clinic. The CCBT programme was compared with mirtazapine or placebo therapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks treatment with a mixed crossover-combination design. Assessments were done at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. By 12 weeks the treatment effect was significantly better in the group initially receiving CCBT, as assessed with the Fatigue Scale (P=0.014) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.001). By 24 weeks the treatment group initially receiving CCBT for 12 weeks followed by mirtazapine for 12 weeks showed significant improvement compared with the other treatment groups on the Fatigue Scale (P<0.001) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.002). Secondary outcome measures showed overall improvement with no significant difference between treatment groups. Multimodal interventions may have positive treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome. Sequence of interventions seem to be of importance.