American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2014
We studied the influence of soluble guanylate (sGC) on renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtrat... more We studied the influence of soluble guanylate (sGC) on renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and RBF autoregulation and its role in mediating the hemodynamic effects of endogenous nitric oxide (NO). Arterial pressure (AP), heart rate (HR), RBF, GFR, urine flow (UV), and the efficiency and mechanisms of RBF autoregulation were studied in anesthetized rats during intravenous infusion of sGC activator cinaciguat before and (except GFR) also after inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) by Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Cinaciguat (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1), n=7) reduced AP and increased HR, but did not significantly alter RBF. In clearance experiments (FITC-sinistrin, n=7) GFR was not significantly altered by cinaciguat (0.1 and 1 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)), but RBF slightly rose (+12%) and filtration fraction (FF) fell (-23%). RBF autoregulatory efficiency (67 vs. 104%) and myogenic response (33 vs. 44 units) were slightly depressed (n=9). NOS inhibition (n=7) increa...
Nitric oxide (NO) blunts the myogenic response (MR) in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. We ... more Nitric oxide (NO) blunts the myogenic response (MR) in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. We sought to clarify the roles of NO synthase (NOS) isoforms, i.e. neuronal NOS (nNOS) from macula densa, endothelial NOS (eNOS) from the endothelium, and inducible NOS (iNOS) from smooth muscle or mesangium. RBF autoregulation was studied in rats and knockout (ko) mice in response to a rapid rise in renal artery pressure (RAP). The autoregulatory rise in renal vascular resistance within the first 6 s was interpreted as MR, from ∼6 to ∼30 s as tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF), and ∼30 to ∼100 s as the third regulatory mechanism. In rats, the nNOS inhibitor SMTC did not significantly affect MR (67 ± 4 vs. 57 ± 4 units). Inhibition of all NOS isoforms by l-NAME in the same animals markedly augmented MR to 78 ± 4 units. The same was found when SMTC was combined with angiotensin II to reproduce the hypertension and vasoconstriction seen with l-NAME (58 ± 3 vs. 54 ± 7 units, l-NAME 81 ± 2 units), or when SMTC was replaced by the nNOS inhibitor NPA (57 ± 5 vs. 56 ± 7 units, l-NAME 79 ± 4 units) or by the iNOS inhibitor 1400W (50 ± 1 vs. 55 ± 4 units, l-NAME 81 ± 3 units). nNOS-ko mice showed the same autoregulation as wild-types (MR 36 ± 4 vs. 38 ± 3 units) and the same response to l-NAME (111 ± 9 vs. 114 ± 10 units). eNOS-ko had similar autoregulation as wild-types (44 ± 8 vs. 33 ± 4 units), but failed to respond to l-NAME (37 ± 7 vs. 78 ± 16 units). We conclude that the attenuating effect of NO on MR depends on eNOS, but not on nNOS or iNOS. In eNOS-ko mice MR is depressed by NO-independent means.
AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2013
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is mediated by nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PG), and end... more Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is mediated by nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PG), and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). We studied the contributions and temporal characteristics of these components in the renal vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (ACh) and bradykinin (BK) and in the buffering of vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and angiotensin II (ANG II). Renal blood flow (RBF) and vascular conductance (RVC) were studied in anesthetized rats in response to renal arterial bolus injections before and after inhibition of NO-synthase (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, L-NAME), cyclooxygenase (indomethacin, INDO), or both. ACh increased RVC peaking at maximal time (tmax) = 29 s. L-NAME (n = 8) diminished the integrated response and made it substantially faster (tmax = 18 s). The point-by-point difference caused by L-NAME (= NO component) integrated to 74% of control and was much slower (tmax = 38 s). INDO (n = 9) reduced the response without affecting tmax (36 vs. 30 s). The difference (= PG) reached 21% of the control with tmax = 25 s. L-NAME+INDO (n = 17) reduced the response to 18% and markedly accelerated tmax to 16s (= EDHF). Results were similar for BK with slightly more PG and less NO contribution than for ACh. Constrictor responses to NE and ANG II were augmented and decelerated by L-NAME and L-NAME+INDO. The calculated difference (= buffering by NO or NO+PG) was slower than the constriction. It is concluded that NO, PG, and EDHF contribute >50%, 20-40%, and <20% to the renal vasodilator effect of ACh and BK, respectively. EDHF acts substantially faster and less sustained (tmax = 16 s) than NO and PG (tmax = 30 s). Constrictor buffering by NO and PG is not constant over time, but renders the constriction less sustained.
American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2014
We studied the influence of soluble guanylate (sGC) on renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtrat... more We studied the influence of soluble guanylate (sGC) on renal blood flow (RBF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and RBF autoregulation and its role in mediating the hemodynamic effects of endogenous nitric oxide (NO). Arterial pressure (AP), heart rate (HR), RBF, GFR, urine flow (UV), and the efficiency and mechanisms of RBF autoregulation were studied in anesthetized rats during intravenous infusion of sGC activator cinaciguat before and (except GFR) also after inhibition of NO synthase (NOS) by Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Cinaciguat (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1), n=7) reduced AP and increased HR, but did not significantly alter RBF. In clearance experiments (FITC-sinistrin, n=7) GFR was not significantly altered by cinaciguat (0.1 and 1 μg·kg(-1)·min(-1)), but RBF slightly rose (+12%) and filtration fraction (FF) fell (-23%). RBF autoregulatory efficiency (67 vs. 104%) and myogenic response (33 vs. 44 units) were slightly depressed (n=9). NOS inhibition (n=7) increa...
Nitric oxide (NO) blunts the myogenic response (MR) in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. We ... more Nitric oxide (NO) blunts the myogenic response (MR) in renal blood flow (RBF) autoregulation. We sought to clarify the roles of NO synthase (NOS) isoforms, i.e. neuronal NOS (nNOS) from macula densa, endothelial NOS (eNOS) from the endothelium, and inducible NOS (iNOS) from smooth muscle or mesangium. RBF autoregulation was studied in rats and knockout (ko) mice in response to a rapid rise in renal artery pressure (RAP). The autoregulatory rise in renal vascular resistance within the first 6 s was interpreted as MR, from ∼6 to ∼30 s as tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF), and ∼30 to ∼100 s as the third regulatory mechanism. In rats, the nNOS inhibitor SMTC did not significantly affect MR (67 ± 4 vs. 57 ± 4 units). Inhibition of all NOS isoforms by l-NAME in the same animals markedly augmented MR to 78 ± 4 units. The same was found when SMTC was combined with angiotensin II to reproduce the hypertension and vasoconstriction seen with l-NAME (58 ± 3 vs. 54 ± 7 units, l-NAME 81 ± 2 units), or when SMTC was replaced by the nNOS inhibitor NPA (57 ± 5 vs. 56 ± 7 units, l-NAME 79 ± 4 units) or by the iNOS inhibitor 1400W (50 ± 1 vs. 55 ± 4 units, l-NAME 81 ± 3 units). nNOS-ko mice showed the same autoregulation as wild-types (MR 36 ± 4 vs. 38 ± 3 units) and the same response to l-NAME (111 ± 9 vs. 114 ± 10 units). eNOS-ko had similar autoregulation as wild-types (44 ± 8 vs. 33 ± 4 units), but failed to respond to l-NAME (37 ± 7 vs. 78 ± 16 units). We conclude that the attenuating effect of NO on MR depends on eNOS, but not on nNOS or iNOS. In eNOS-ko mice MR is depressed by NO-independent means.
AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 2013
Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is mediated by nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PG), and end... more Endothelium-dependent vasodilation is mediated by nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandins (PG), and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). We studied the contributions and temporal characteristics of these components in the renal vasodilator responses to acetylcholine (ACh) and bradykinin (BK) and in the buffering of vasoconstrictor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and angiotensin II (ANG II). Renal blood flow (RBF) and vascular conductance (RVC) were studied in anesthetized rats in response to renal arterial bolus injections before and after inhibition of NO-synthase (N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, L-NAME), cyclooxygenase (indomethacin, INDO), or both. ACh increased RVC peaking at maximal time (tmax) = 29 s. L-NAME (n = 8) diminished the integrated response and made it substantially faster (tmax = 18 s). The point-by-point difference caused by L-NAME (= NO component) integrated to 74% of control and was much slower (tmax = 38 s). INDO (n = 9) reduced the response without affecting tmax (36 vs. 30 s). The difference (= PG) reached 21% of the control with tmax = 25 s. L-NAME+INDO (n = 17) reduced the response to 18% and markedly accelerated tmax to 16s (= EDHF). Results were similar for BK with slightly more PG and less NO contribution than for ACh. Constrictor responses to NE and ANG II were augmented and decelerated by L-NAME and L-NAME+INDO. The calculated difference (= buffering by NO or NO+PG) was slower than the constriction. It is concluded that NO, PG, and EDHF contribute >50%, 20-40%, and <20% to the renal vasodilator effect of ACh and BK, respectively. EDHF acts substantially faster and less sustained (tmax = 16 s) than NO and PG (tmax = 30 s). Constrictor buffering by NO and PG is not constant over time, but renders the constriction less sustained.
Uploads