Let $X$ be a projective normal surface over a number field $K$. Let $H$ be the sum of four proper... more Let $X$ be a projective normal surface over a number field $K$. Let $H$ be the sum of four properly intersecting ample effective divisors on $X$. We show that any set of $S$-integral points in $X-H$ is not Zariski dense.
Let $X$ be a projective variety over a number field $K$ (resp. over $\mathbb{C}$). Let $H$ be the... more Let $X$ be a projective variety over a number field $K$ (resp. over $\mathbb{C}$). Let $H$ be the sum of ``sufficiently many positive divisors'' on $X$. We show that any set of quasi-integral points (resp. any integral curve) in $X-H$ is not Zariski dense.
In this note we make,some,remarks,concerning,maximum,principles holding,for nonlocal,diffusion op... more In this note we make,some,remarks,concerning,maximum,principles holding,for nonlocal,diffusion operator,of the form M[u](x) :=
Let $X$ be a projective normal surface over a number field $K$. Let $H$ be the sum of four proper... more Let $X$ be a projective normal surface over a number field $K$. Let $H$ be the sum of four properly intersecting ample effective divisors on $X$. We show that any set of $S$-integral points in $X-H$ is not Zariski dense.
Let $X$ be a projective variety over a number field $K$ (resp. over $\mathbb{C}$). Let $H$ be the... more Let $X$ be a projective variety over a number field $K$ (resp. over $\mathbb{C}$). Let $H$ be the sum of ``sufficiently many positive divisors'' on $X$. We show that any set of quasi-integral points (resp. any integral curve) in $X-H$ is not Zariski dense.
In this note we make,some,remarks,concerning,maximum,principles holding,for nonlocal,diffusion op... more In this note we make,some,remarks,concerning,maximum,principles holding,for nonlocal,diffusion operator,of the form M[u](x) :=
Uploads
Papers by Pascal Autissier