Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3178212.3178232acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsebConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating Usability for Mobile Application: A MAUEM Approach

Published: 28 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Many traditional usability metrics were purposely created for desktop computer applications and may not be directly applicable to mobile device applications. Usability metrics refer as means of measuring or evaluating the usability factors, attributes and related measurable criteria corresponding to usability attributes. The objectives of this paper were to evaluate the usability attributes and metrics of mobile device applications by using the unsupervised usability evaluation tool. Subjective and objective measurements were used to clarify the usability metrics collected in the log file which are generated by the unsupervised usability tool. The proposed Mobile Application Usability Evaluation Metrics (MAUEM) model can provides guidance on how and what to measure for each usability attribute which could lead to a complete usability evaluation for a mobile application.

References

[1]
Tullis, T., and Albert, W. 2008. Measuring the User Experience Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
[2]
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. B., and Padda, H. K. 2006. Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal. 14(2) 159--178.
[3]
Lettner, F. 2013. A Generic Concept for Task-driven Usability Testing in Mobile Ecosystems. UbiComp '13 Adjunct. ACM 978-1-4503-2139. Available at http://www.ubicomp.org/ubicomp2013/dc/lettner-jr-ds-crc.pdf.
[4]
Harrison, R., Flood, D., and Duce, D. 2013. Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science. Springer 1.1.1-16.
[5]
Saleh, A., Ismail, R. B., and Fabil, N. B. 2015. Extension of Pacmad Model for Usability Evaluation Metrics Using Goal Question Metrics (GGM) Approach. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 79(1)90. Available at http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol79No1/10Vol79No1.pdf.
[6]
Nielsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. Boston: Academic Press. Morgan Kaufmann Pub.
[7]
Adipat, B., and Zhang, D. 2005. Interface Design for Mobile Applications. Proceedings of the 2005 Americas Conference on Information Systems (Omaha, Nebraska, USA, August 11-15) 1862--1868.
[8]
Martin, C., Flood, D., Sutton, D., Aldea, A., Harrison, R., and Waite, M. 2011. A Systematic Evaluation of Mobile Applications for Diabetes Management. INTERACT'11 Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Portugal. September, 2011)466--469.
[9]
Avrahami, D., Fogarty, J., and Hudson, S. E. 2007. Biases in human estimation of Interruptibility: Effects and implications for practice". In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '07. New York, NY: USA. ACM, 2007).
[10]
Hussain, A. and Ferneley, E. 2008. Usability Metric framework for Mobile Phone Application: a goal question metric (GQM) approach. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. 567--570.
[11]
Idri A., Moumane K., and Abran A. 2013. On the use of software quality standard ISO/IEC9126 in mobile environments". In: 20th APSEC conference (Bangkok, 2013) 1--8.
[12]
Avrahami, D., Fogarty, J., and Hudson, S. E. 2007. Biases in human estimation of Interruptibility: effects and implications for practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems CHI '07 (New York, NY: USA)50-60.
[13]
Kim, L., and Albers, M. J. 2001. Web design issues when searching for information in a small screen display. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation SIGDOC '01. ACM, New Mexico, USA, 193--200.
[14]
Lewis, C., and Wharton, C. 1997. Cognitive walkthroughs. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (Eds.). Handbook of Human-computer Interaction. 2nd ed., 717--732. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Service Re-Selection for Disruptive Events in Mobile Environments: A Heuristic Technique for Decision Support at RuntimeInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10392-826:3(1063-1090)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2024)EZ Arabic: Mobile Application to Learn ArabicProceedings of the International Conference on Advancing and Redesigning Education 202310.1007/978-981-97-4507-4_53(491-498)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Electromagnetic induced: Design and build Android-based applicationsPROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCE OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING 2021 (SIMASE 2021): Post Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities in Environment, Science, and Engineering Research10.1063/5.0118414(060010)Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICSEB '17: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and e-Business
December 2017
141 pages
ISBN:9781450354882
DOI:10.1145/3178212
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

  • Wuhan Univ.: Wuhan University, China

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 December 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Mobile application
  2. unsupervised tool
  3. usability
  4. usability metrics

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICSEB 2017

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 09 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Service Re-Selection for Disruptive Events in Mobile Environments: A Heuristic Technique for Decision Support at RuntimeInformation Systems Frontiers10.1007/s10796-023-10392-826:3(1063-1090)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
  • (2024)EZ Arabic: Mobile Application to Learn ArabicProceedings of the International Conference on Advancing and Redesigning Education 202310.1007/978-981-97-4507-4_53(491-498)Online publication date: 14-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Electromagnetic induced: Design and build Android-based applicationsPROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCE OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING 2021 (SIMASE 2021): Post Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities in Environment, Science, and Engineering Research10.1063/5.0118414(060010)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)Mobile Applications Usability Evaluation: Systematic Review and ReappraisalHCI International 2022 - Late Breaking Papers. Design, User Experience and Interaction10.1007/978-3-031-17615-9_35(499-516)Online publication date: 26-Jun-2022
  • (2021)CoKnowEMe: An Edge Evaluation Scheme for QoS of IoMT Microservices in 6G ScenarioFuture Internet10.3390/fi1307017713:7(177)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2021
  • (2021)User Interface MattersProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2021.07.039191:C(9-16)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021
  • (2020)List of Most Usability Evaluation in Mobile Application: A Systematic Literature Review2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech)10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211160(283-287)Online publication date: Aug-2020
  • (2020)Usability of Mobile Applications: A Systematic Literature StudyIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2020.29818928(55563-55577)Online publication date: 2020
  • (2020)Usability MiningDesign Science Research. Cases10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_7(155-176)Online publication date: 24-Sep-2020
  • (2018)Mobile learning analytics in higher education: usability testing and evaluation of an app prototypeInteractive Technology and Smart Education10.1108/ITSE-04-2018-002415:4(332-347)Online publication date: 13-Nov-2018

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media