Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3197768.3201568acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Audio, Visual, and Tactile Cues for Synchronous Remote Assistance

Published: 26 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Today, remote collaboration techniques between field workers and remotely located experts mainly focus on traditional communication channels, such as voice- or video-conferencing. Those systems may not be suitable in every situation or the communication gets cumbersome if both parties do not share a common ground. In this paper, we explore three supporting communication channels based on audio, visual, and tactile cues. We built a prototypical application implementing those cues and evaluated them in a user study. Based on the user feedback, we report first insights for building remote assistance systems utilizing additional cues.

References

[1]
L. Alem and J. Li. 2011. A Study of Gestures in a Video-mediated Collaborative Assembly Task. Adv. in Hum.-Comp. Int. 2011, Article 1 (Jan. 2011), 7 pages.
[2]
J. Amores, X. Benavides, and P. Maes. 2015. ShowMe: A Remote Collaboration System That Supports Immersive Gestural Communication. In Proc. CHI EA '15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1343--1348.
[3]
X. Benavides, J. Amores, and P. Maes. 2015. Remot-IO: A System for Reaching into the Environment of a Remote Collaborator. In Adj. Proc. UIST '15. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 99--100.
[4]
M. Funk, J. Heusler, E. Akcay, K. Weiland, and A. Schmidt. 2016. Haptic, Auditory, or Visual?: Towards Optimal Error Feedback at Manual Assembly Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '16. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1--6.
[5]
S. Fussell and R. Krauss. 1989. The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 25, 3 (1989), 203--219.
[6]
S. Fussell, L. Setlock, and R. Kraut. 2003. Effects of head-mounted and scene-oriented video systems on remote collaboration on physical tasks. In Proc. CHI '03. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 513.
[7]
S. Fussell, L. Setlock, J. Yang, J. Ou, E. Mauer, and A. Kramer. 2004. Gestures over Video Streams to Support Remote Collaboration on Physical Tasks. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 3 (Sept. 2004), 273--309.
[8]
S. Gauglitz, B. Nuernberger, M. Turk, and T. Höllerer. 2014. In Touch with the Remote World: Remote Collaboration with Augmented Reality Drawings and Virtual Navigation. In Proc. of VRST '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197--205.
[9]
S. Gauglitz, B. Nuernberger, M. Turk, and T. Höllerer. 2014. World-stabilized annotations and virtual scene navigation for remote collaboration. In Proc. UIST '14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 449--459.
[10]
P. Gurevich, J. Lanir, B. Cohen, and R. Stone. 2012. TeleAdvisor: A Versatile Augmented Reality Tool for Remote Assistance. In Proc. CHI '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 619--622.
[11]
S. Günther, F. Müller, M. Funk, J. Kirchner, N. Dezfuli, and M. Mühlhäuser. 2018. TactileGlove: Assistive Spatial Guidance in 3D Space through Vibrotactile Navigation. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments - PETRA '18. ACM.
[12]
W. Heuten, N. Henze, S. Boll, and M. Pielot. 2008. Tactile Wayfinder. In Proc. NordiCHI '08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 172.
[13]
S. Holland, R. D. Morse, and H. Gedenryd. 2002. AudioGPS: Spatial Audio Navigation with a Minimal Attention Interface. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6, 4 (2002), 253--259.
[14]
W. Huang and L. Alem. 2011. Supporting Hand Gestures in Mobile Remote Collaboration: A Usability Evaluation. In Proc. BCS-HCI '11. BCS, Swinton, UK, 211--216. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2305316.2305356
[15]
S. Kasahara and J. Rekimoto. 2015. JackIn Head: Immersive Visual Telepresence System with Omnidirectional Wearable Camera for Remote Collaboration. In VRST '15. ACM, NY, USA, 217--225.
[16]
B. Katz, S. Kammoun, G. Parseihian, O. Gutierrez, A. Brilhault, M. Auvray, P. Truillet, M. Denis, S. Thorpe, and C. Jouffrais. 2012. NAVIG: augmented reality guidance system for the visually impaired. Virtual Reality 16, 4 (2012), 253--269.
[17]
O. B. Kaul and M. Rohs. 2017. HapticHead: A Spherical Vibrotactile Grid Around the Head for 3D Guidance in Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3729--3740.
[18]
D. Kirk and D. Stanton Fraser. 2006. Comparing remote gesture technologies for supporting collaborative physical tasks. In CHI '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 1191.
[19]
T. Kosch, R. Kettner, M. Funk, and A. Schmidt. 2016. Comparing Tactile, Auditory, and Visual Assembly Error-Feedback for Workers with Cognitive Impairments. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ACM, 53--60.
[20]
R. Kraut, S. Fussell, and J. Siegel. 2003. Visual Information As a Conversational Resource in Collaborative Physical Tasks. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 18, 1 (2003), 13--49.
[21]
H. Kuzuoka. 1992. Spatial workspace collaboration. In Proc. of CHI '92. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 533--540.
[22]
S. Lee and T. Starner. 2010. BuzzWear. In Proc. of CHI '10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 433.
[23]
R. Stalnaker. 2002. Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 5--6 (2002), 701--721.
[24]
V. Sundareswaran, K. Wang, S. Chen, R. Behringer, J. McGee, C. Tam, and P. Zahorik. 2003. 3D Audio Augmented Reality: Implementation and Experiments. In Proc. of ISMAR '03. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 296-. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=946248.946841
[25]
F. Tecchia, L. Alem, and W. Huang. 2012. 3D helping hands. In VRCAI '12. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 323.
[26]
K. Tsukada and M. Yasumura. 2004. ActiveBelt: Belt-Type Wearable Tactile Display for Directional Navigation. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 384--399.
[27]
J. Zelek. 2005. Seeing by touch (haptics) for wayfinding. International Congress Series 1282 (2005), 1108 - 1112.
[28]
J. Zelek, S. Bromley, D. Asmar, and D. Thompson. 2003. A haptic glove as a tactile-vision sensory substitution for wayfinding. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 97, 10 (2003), 621--632. http://www.afb.org/jvib/

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)HelpCall: Designing Informal Technology Assistance for Older Adults via VideoconferencingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642938(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Co2iAR: Co-located audio-visual enabled mobile collaborative industrial AR wiring harness assemblyRobotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2024.10279590(102795)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2024)AWARESCUES: Awareness Cues Scaling with Group Size and Extended Reality DevicesVirtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality10.1007/978-3-031-61041-7_4(44-59)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Audio, Visual, and Tactile Cues for Synchronous Remote Assistance

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '18: Proceedings of the 11th PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments Conference
      June 2018
      591 pages
      ISBN:9781450363907
      DOI:10.1145/3197768
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      In-Cooperation

      • NSF: National Science Foundation

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 26 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. 3D-Space
      2. Assistive Technology
      3. Audio Cues
      4. Augmented Reality
      5. Haptics
      6. Navigation
      7. Remote Collaboration
      8. Spatial Guidance
      9. Vibrotactile Feedback

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      PETRA '18

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)55
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
      Reflects downloads up to 16 Oct 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)HelpCall: Designing Informal Technology Assistance for Older Adults via VideoconferencingProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642938(1-23)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Co2iAR: Co-located audio-visual enabled mobile collaborative industrial AR wiring harness assemblyRobotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing10.1016/j.rcim.2024.10279590(102795)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • (2024)AWARESCUES: Awareness Cues Scaling with Group Size and Extended Reality DevicesVirtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality10.1007/978-3-031-61041-7_4(44-59)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
      • (2024)Communication Cues for Remote GuidanceComputer‐Supported Collaboration10.1002/9781119719830.ch4(81-114)Online publication date: 24-May-2024
      • (2023)Can you notice my attention? A novel information vision enhancement method in MR remote collaborative assemblyThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology10.1007/s00170-023-11652-2127:3-4(1835-1857)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2023
      • (2022)Improving Remote Spatial Understanding by Transmitting Spherical Images via Video Chat ApplicationsInternational Journal of Automation Technology10.20965/ijat.2022.p028616:3(286-295)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
      • (2022)Smooth as Steel Wool: Effects of Visual Stimuli on the Haptic Perception of Roughness in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3517454(1-17)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
      • (2022)Supporting workspace awareness in remote assistance through a flexible multi-camera system and Augmented Reality awareness cuesJournal of Visual Communication and Image Representation10.1016/j.jvcir.2022.10365589:COnline publication date: 1-Nov-2022
      • (2022)A review on communication cues for augmented reality based remote guidanceJournal on Multimodal User Interfaces10.1007/s12193-022-00387-116:2(239-256)Online publication date: 12-Apr-2022
      • (2022)A novel AR remote collaborative platform for sharing 2.5D gestures and gazeThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology10.1007/s00170-022-08747-7119:9-10(6413-6421)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2022
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media