research-article

Research on MOOCs: current trends and taking into account of content

Authors:

Abdelghani Babori,

Hicham Fihri Fassi,

Abdelkarim ZaidAuthors Info & Claims

NISS '19: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security

Article No.: 17, Pages 1 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1145/3320326.3320349

Published: 27 March 2019 Publication History

Abstract

This study explores the research trends of MOOCs to gain a deeper understanding of the MOOC phenomenon. It also aims to question whether or not content is taken into account in these studies, especially those produced between 2012 and 2018. The analysis reveals that multiple frameworks were adopted to address research questions that essentially focused on learning processes, predictors of retention, learning experiences and course design. Our study also shows that content was little considered as a research object.

References

[1]

Adams, C., Yin, Y., Vargas Madriz, L. F., and Mullen, C. S. 2014. A phenomenology of learning large: the tutorial sphere of xMOOC video lectures. Distance Education, 35, 2 (2014), 202--216.

[2]

Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., and Pilli, O. 2015. Assessment in Massive Open Online Courses. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13, 4 (2016), 207--216. Retrieved from: www.ejel.org/

[3]

Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., and Fernández-Panadero, C. 2017. Understanding learners' motivation and learning strategies in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 3 (2017), 120--137.

[4]

Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., and Rangwala, H. 2018. Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1--9.

[5]

Andersen, R. and Ponti, M. 2014. Participatory pedagogy in an open educational course: challenges and opportunities. Distance Education, 35, 2 (2014), 234--249.

[6]

Arora, S., Goel, M., Sabitha, A. S., and Mehrotra, D. 2017. Learner groups in massive open online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31, 2 (2017), 80--97.

[7]

Ashton, S. and Davies, R. S. 2015. Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education, 36, 3 (2015), 312--334.

[8]

Bogdan, R. 2017. Integrating MOOCs in Embedded Systems Blended Courses. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 8, 3 (2017), 101--107. Retrieved from: http://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain

[9]

Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., and Zawacki-Richter, O. 2017. Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: Review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 5 (2017).

[10]

Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., and Lin, C. F. 2015. Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 3 (2015), 528--541.

[11]

Chen, Y. H., and Chen, P. J. 2015. MOOC study group: Facilitation strategies, influential factors, and student perceived gains. Computers & Education, 86, 55--70.

Digital Library

[12]

Cheng, J. C. (2014). An exploratory study of emotional affordance of a massive open online course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17, 1 (2014), 43--55.

[13]

Cho, M. H., and Byun, M. K. 2017. Nonnative English-Speaking Students' Lived Learning Experiences With MOOCs in a Regular College Classroom. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 5 (2017).

[14]

Cohen, L. and Magen-Nagar, N. 2016. Self-Regulated Learning and a Sense of Achievement in MOOCs Among High School Science and Technology Students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 2 (2016), 68--79.

[15]

Conole, G. 2014. A new classification schema for MOOCs. The international journal for Innovation and Quality in Learning, 2, 3 (2014), 65--77. Retrieved from: http://innoqual.efquel.org/

[16]

Costley, J., and Lange, C. H. 2017. The effects of lecture diversity on germane load. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 2 (2017).

[17]

Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., and Houben, G. J. 2018. Activating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies. Computers & Education, 125, 327--344.

Digital Library

[18]

de Lima, M. and Zorrilla, M. E. 2017. Social Networks and the Building of Learning Communities: An Experimental Study of a Social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 1 (2017),.

[19]

Deshpande, A., and Chukhlomin, V. 2017. What Makes a Good MOOC: A Field Study of Factors Impacting Student Motivation to Learn. American Journal of Distance Education, 31, 4 (2017), 275--293.

[20]

Ebben, M., and Murphy, J. S. 2014. Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 3 (2014), 328--345. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjem20

[21]

Engle, D., Mankoff, C., and Carbrey, J. 2015. Coursera's introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 2 (2015).

[22]

Evans, S. and Myrick, J. G. 2015. How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education, 36, 3 (2015), 295--311.

[23]

Formanek, M., Wenger, M. C., Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., and Sonam, T. 2017. Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC. Computers & Education, 113, 243--262.

[24]

Firmin, R., Schiorring, E., Whitmer, J., Willett, T., Collins, E. D., and Sujitparapitaya, S. 2014. Case study: Using MOOCs for conventional college coursework. Distance Education, 35, 2 (2014), 178--201.

[25]

Gameel, B. G. 2017. Learner satisfaction with massive open online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31, 2 (2017), 98--111.

[26]

Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., and Siemens, G. 2014. Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 5 (2014).

[27]

Gil-Jaurena, I., Callejo-Gallego, J., and Agudo, Y. 2017. Evaluation of the UNED MOOCs implementation: demographics, learners' opinions and completion rates. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 7 (2017).

[28]

Gillani, N. and Eynon, R. 2014. Communication patterns in massively open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 18--26.

[29]

Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., and Pomerantz, J. 2015. Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 5 (2015), 925--955.

[30]

Hasni, A., Bousadra, F., Belletête, V., Benabdallah, A., Nicole, M. C., and Dumais, N. 2016. Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K-12 levels: a systematic review. Studies in Science education, 52, 2 (2016), 199--231.

[31]

Henderikx, M. A., Kreijns, K., and Kalz, M. 2017. Refining success and dropout in massive open online courses based on the intention--behavior gap. Distance Education, 38, 3 (2017), 353--368.

[32]

Hew, K. F. 2016. Promoting engagement in online courses: What strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47, 2 (2016), 320--341.

[33]

Hew, K. F., and Cheung, W. S. 2014. Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12, 45--58.

[34]

Higashi, R. M., Schunn, C. D., and Flot, J. B. 2017. Different underlying motivations and abilities predict student versus teacher persistence in an online course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 6 (2017), 1471--1493.

[35]

Huisman, B., Admiraal, W., Pilli, O., van de Ven, M., and Saab, N. 2018. Peer assessment in MOOCs: The relationship between peer reviewers' ability and authors' essay performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 1 (2018), 101--110.

[36]

Hone, K. S. and El Said, G. R. 2016. Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers & Education, 98, 157--168.

Digital Library

[37]

Israel, M. J. 2015. Effectiveness of integrating MOOCs in traditional classrooms for undergraduate students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 5 (2015).

[38]

Jacoby, J. 2014. The disruptive potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A literature review. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 18, 1 (2014), 73. Retrieved from: http://www.jofdl.nz/index.php/JOFDL

[39]

Jézégou, A. 2015. Diriger soi-même ses activités d'apprentissage par et dans un Mooc de type connectiviste. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 30, 1 (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/index

[40]

Kahan, T., Soffer, T., and Nachmias, R. 2017. Types of Participant Behavior in a Massive Open Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 6 (2017).

[41]

Kellogg, S., Booth, S., and Oliver, K. 2014. A social network perspective on peer supported learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 5 (2014).

[42]

Kennedy, J. 2014. Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): A research review, 2009--2012. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 13, 1 (2014).

[43]

Kizilcec, R. F., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., and Maldonado, J. J. 2017. Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & education, 104, 18--33.

Digital Library

[44]

Kop, R. and Carroll, F. 2011. Cloud computing and creativity: Learning on a massive open online course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 14, 2 (2011). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org

[45]

Koutropoulos, A., Gallagher, M. S., Abajian, S. C., de Waard, I., Hogue, R. J., Keskin, N. Ö., and Rodriguez, C. O. 2012. Emotive vocabulary in MOOCs: Context & participant retention. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15, 1 (2012). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org

[46]

Kwak, S. 2017. Approaches Reflected in Academic Writing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 3 (2017).

[47]

Lebeaume, J. (2000). L'éducation technologique. Histoires et méthodes. Issy-Les-Moulineaux, ESF.

[48]

Li, N., Verma, H., Skevi, A., Zufferey, G., Blom, J., and Dillenbourg, P. 2014. Watching MOOCs together: Investigating co-located MOOC study groups. Distance Education, 35, 2 (2014), 217--233.

[49]

Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., and Mustain, P. 2016. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40--48.

[50]

Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M., Lim, M., Ko, Y., Myers, R., and Schmitz Weiss, A. 2014. Understanding MOOCs as an emerging online learning tool: Perspectives from the students. American Journal of Distance Education, 28, 3 (2014), 147--159.

[51]

Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J., and Liu, S. 2016. Examining the Use of Facebook and Twitter as an Additional Social Space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 1 (2016), 14--26.

[52]

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., and Williams, S. A. 2013. MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14, 3 (2013), 202--227.

[53]

Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K. Ø., and Williams, S. A. 2015. Who are with us: MOOC learners on a FutureLearncourse. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 3 (2015), 557--569.

[54]

Loizzo, J. and Ertmer, P. A. 2016. MOOCocracy: the learning culture of massive open online courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 6 (2016), 1013--1032.

[55]

Martinand, J. L. 2012. Éducation au Développement durable et didactiques du curriculum. In Conférence au XIXe Colloque AFIRSE (Lisbonne: Portugal).

[56]

Martschink, B. 2014. Mathematics courses: Fostering individuality through EMOOCs. eLearning Papers. 37, 71--78. Retrieved from: www.elearningpapers.eu

[57]

Milligan, C. and Littlejohn, A. 2016. How health professionals regulate their learning in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 113--121.

[58]

Milligan, C. and Littlejohn, A. 2017. Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 2 (2017).

[59]

Najafi, H., Rolheiser, C., Harrison, L., and Håklev, S. (2015). University of Toronto instructors' experiences with developing MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 3 (2015).

[60]

Newman, D. R., Webb, B., and Cochrane C. 1997, "Evaluating the quality of learning in computer supported cooperative learning", Journal of the American Society for Information science, 48, 6 (1997), pp. 484--495.

[61]

Nortvig, A. M. and Christiansen, R. B. 2017. Institutional Collaboration on MOOCs in Education---A Literature Review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 6 (2017).

[62]

Paton, R. M., Fluck, A. E., and Scanlan, J. D. 2018. Engagement and retention in VET Needle in a haystack from 2013-2017. Computers & Education, 125, 191--201.

Digital Library

[63]

Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., and Evans, C. 2014. Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43, 9 (2014), 421--432.

[64]

Phan, T., McNeil, S. G., and Robin, B. R. 2016. Students' patterns of engagement and course performance in a Massive Open Online Course. Computers & Education, 95, 36--44.

Digital Library

[65]

Pilli, O. and Admiraal, W. F. 2016. A taxonomy for Massive Open Online Courses. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7, 3 (2016), 223--240. Retrieved from: http://www.cedtech.net/

[66]

Poce, A. 2015. Developing critical perspectives on technology in education: A tool for MOOC evaluation. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 18, 1 (2015). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/

[67]

Pundak, D., Sabag, N., and Trotskovsky, E. 2014. Accreditation of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 17, 2 (2014), 117--129. Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/

[68]

Raffaghelli, J. E., Cucchiara, S., and Persico, D. 2015. Methodological approaches in MOOC research: Retracing the myth of Proteus. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 3 (2015), 488--509.

[69]

Rieber, L. P. 2017. Participation patterns in a massive open online course (MOOC) about statistics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 6 (2017), 1295--1304.

[70]

Rohs, M. and Ganz, M. 2015. MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 6 (2017).

[71]

Rolfe, V. 2015. A systematic review of the socio-ethical aspects of Massive Online Open Courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18, 1 (2015), 52--71. Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/

[72]

Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., and Canelas, D. A. 2017. Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35--50.

Digital Library

[73]

Svinicki, M. D. 2010. A guidebook on conceptual frameworks for research in engineering education. Rigorous Research in Engineering Education, 1--53.

[74]

Soffer, T. and Cohen, A. 2015. Implementation of Tel Aviv University MOOCs in academic curriculum: A pilot study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 1 (2015).

[75]

Stich, A. E. and Reeves, T. D. 2017. Massive open online courses and underserved students in the United States. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 58--71.

[76]

Temperman, G., De Lièvre, B., and De Stercke, J. 2016. Activity Dashboard, Time Management, Self-Regulation and Efficiency in a CSCL Environment. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 31, 1 (2016). Retrieved from: http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/index

[77]

Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., and Lozano, J. B. 2015. Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The internet and higher education, 24, 1--12.

[78]

Veletsianos, G. and Shepherdson, P. 2015. Who studies MOOCs? Interdisciplinarity in MOOC research and its changes over time. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 3 (2015).

[79]

Veletsianos, G. and Shepherdson, P. 2016. A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 2 (2016).

[80]

Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., and Schneider, E. 2015. Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOC s: Participation in social networks outside of MOOC s, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 3 (2015), 570--587.

[81]

Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., and Czerniewicz, L. 2016. Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37, 2 (2016), 208--223.

[82]

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., and Barbera, E. 2016. Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 2 (2016), 683--699.

[83]

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Janakiraman, S., and Richardson, J. 2017. A team of instructors' use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance strategies: An animal behaviour and welfare MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18), 2 (2017).

[84]

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Alamri, H., and Mueller, C. 2017. Learner profiles of attitudinal learning in a MOOC: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 114, 274--285.

Digital Library

[85]

Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Richardson, J., and Loizzo, J. 2016. Instructor's use of social presence, teaching presence, and attitudinal dissonance: A case study of an attitudinal change MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 3.

[86]

Watted, A. and Barak, M. 2018. Motivating factors of MOOC completers: Comparing between university-affiliated students and general participants. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 11--20.

[87]

Wise, A. F., Cui, Y., Jin, W., and Vytasek, J. 2017. Mining for gold: Identifying content-related MOOC discussion threads across domains through linguistic modeling. The Internet and Higher Education, 32, 11--28.

[88]

Weller, M. and Anderson, T. 2013. Digital resilience in higher education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 16, 1 (2013). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/

[89]

Yang, H. H. and Su, C. H. 2017. Learner Behaviour in a MOOC Practice-oriented Course: In Empirical Study Integrating TAM and TPB. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18, 5 (2017).

[90]

Yang, M., Shao, Z., Liu, Q., and Liu, C. 2017. Understanding the quality factors that influence the continuance intention of students toward participation in MOOCs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 5 (2017), 1195--1214.

[91]

Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., and HaraldJakobs, M. W. 2014. A Review of the State-of-the-Art. In Proceedings of CSEDU2014, 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, (Spain, 2014), 9--20.

[92]

Wang, Z., Anderson, T., Chen, L., and Barbera, E. 2016. Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 2 (2016), 683--699.

[93]

Zaid, A. 2017. Élaborer, transmettre et construire des contenus scientifiques et technologiques. Perspective didactique des dispositifs d'éducation et de formation. PUR, Rennes,.

[94]

Zawacki-Richter, O., Bozkurt, A., Alturki, U., and Aldraiweesh, A. 2018. What Research Says About MOOCs--An Explorative Content Analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19, 1 (2018).

[95]

Zhang, J. 2016. Can MOOCs be interesting to students? An experimental investigation from regulatory focus perspective. Computers & Education, 95, 340--351.

Digital Library

[96]

Zhang, J., Skryabin, M., and Song, X. 2016. Understanding the dynamics of MOOC discussion forums with simulation investigation for empirical network analysis (SIENA). Distance Education, 37, 3 (2016), 270--286.

[97]

Zhang, Q., Peck, K. L., Hristova, A., Jablokow, K. W., Hoffman, V., Park, E., and Bayeck, R. Y. 2016. Exploring the communication preferences of MOOC learners and the value of preference-based groups: Is grouping enough?. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 4 (2016), 809--837.

[98]

Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students' acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194--203.

Digital Library

[99]

Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31--39.

[100]

Zutshi, S., O'Hare, S., and Rodafinos, A. 2013. Experiences in MOOCs: The perspective of students. American Journal of Distance Education, 27, 4 (2013), 218--227.

Cited By

Minga-Vallejo RRamírez-Montoya MRodríguez-Conde M(2024)Open and Collaborative Innovation for the Social Construction of Learning: Descriptive Analysis of an xMOOC DesignSage Open10.1177/2158244024124188814:2Online publication date: 14-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241241888
Huertas-Abril CMuszyńska B(2022)Learning Design Preferences in LMOOCsInternational Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching10.4018/IJCALLT.29110612:1(1-17)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJCALLT.291106
Cobos R(2022)The Learning Analytics System that Improves the Teaching-Learning Experience of MOOC Instructors and StudentsLearning Technologies and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_3(29-40)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_3
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Research on MOOCs: current trends and taking into account of content
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. E-learning

Recommendations

Crowd-sourced learning in MOOCs: learning analytics meets measurement theory
LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge

This paper illustrated the promise of the combination of measurement theory and learning analytics for understanding effective MOOC learning. It reports findings from a study of whether and how MOOC log file data can assist in understanding how MOOC ...
Facilitating MOOCs learning through weekly meet-up: a case study in Taiwan
L@S '14: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference

Online learners need various supports to survive, and it is especially true in the context of MOOCs. Yet, studies documenting the learning progress as a function of learner support are at its inception. Based on self-determination theory and via weekly ...
Supportiveness of language MOOCs for self-regulated learning: a review of commercial language MOOCs on the market

MOOCs have been frequently applied as an effective approach to language education, especially when they can support self-regulated learning. However, few studies have discussed the supportiveness of using MOOCs for language education (i.e. language MOOCs) ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

NISS '19: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security

March 2019

512 pages

ISBN:9781450366458

DOI:10.1145/3320326

Editors:
Badr Abouelmajd
FSR, Mohammed V University, Morocco
,
Mohamed Ben Ahmed
FSTT, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco
,
Boudhir Anouar Abdelhakim
FSTT, Abdelmalek Essaâdi University, Morocco
,
Hassan El Ghazi
INPT, Morocco

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 March 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

NISS19

NISS19: Networking, Information Systems & Security

March 27 - 29, 2019

Rabat, Morocco

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
160
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)3
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Minga-Vallejo RRamírez-Montoya MRodríguez-Conde M(2024)Open and Collaborative Innovation for the Social Construction of Learning: Descriptive Analysis of an xMOOC DesignSage Open10.1177/2158244024124188814:2Online publication date: 14-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241241888
Huertas-Abril CMuszyńska B(2022)Learning Design Preferences in LMOOCsInternational Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching10.4018/IJCALLT.29110612:1(1-17)Online publication date: 18-Feb-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.4018/IJCALLT.291106
Cobos R(2022)The Learning Analytics System that Improves the Teaching-Learning Experience of MOOC Instructors and StudentsLearning Technologies and Systems10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_3(29-40)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-031-33023-0_3
Babori AFalih NOuchitachen H(2022)A Framework for Adaptive E-learning Systems Based on Self-regulated Learning StrategiesDigital Technologies and Applications10.1007/978-3-031-01942-5_38(380-387)Online publication date: 8-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01942-5_38
KHAN AKHAN KATLAS FAKHTAR SKHAN F(2021)CRITICAL FACTORS INFLUENCING MOOCS RETENTION: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYTurkish Online Journal of Distance Education10.17718/tojde.1002776(82-101)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1002776
BABORI AGHOULAM KFALIH NOUCHITACHEN H(2021)Elearning 4.0 for higher education: literature review, trends and perspectives2021 International Conference on Digital Age & Technological Advances for Sustainable Development (ICDATA)10.1109/ICDATA52997.2021.00032(121-128)Online publication date: Jun-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDATA52997.2021.00032
Cobos RRuiz‐Garcia J(2020)Improving learner engagement in MOOCs using a learning intervention system: A research study in engineering educationComputer Applications in Engineering Education10.1002/cae.2231629:4(733-749)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22316

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents