research-article

Co-Design with Older Adults: Examining and Reflecting on Collaboration with Aging Communities

Authors:

Dawn K. Sakaguchi-Tang,

Jay L. Cunningham,

Julie A. KientzAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

Article No.: 362, Pages 1 - 28

https://doi.org/10.1145/3479506

Published: 18 October 2021 Publication History

Abstract

Co-design methods have involved older adults in the design process to fill the knowledge gap that younger adult designers might encounter when designing for an aging population. A focus of co-design means establishing equal and equitable relationships between users and designers. To understand the factors that contribute to equal collaborations between older adults and student designers, we conducted 12 co-design sessions with 16 older adults and 11 student designers. We examined their interactions by adapting a framework initially aimed to understand the child-adult design partnership. We also analyzed student designers' reflections to understand their experiences and learnings from designing with older adults. Our findings demonstrate that developing a design partnership is complex. The framework helped surface factors like sharing life experiences and role ownership that influenced balanced or unbalanced interactions. Through the student designers' reflections, we found that student designers identified challenges they encountered and the assumptions they had about the older adult population. We believe that immersing students in a co-design experience with older adults and leveraging reflection activities provides an educational and meaningful experience to the design students.

References

[1]

Maria Beimborn, Selma Kadi, Nina Koberer, and Mara Muhleck. 2016. Focusing on the Human: Interdisciplinary Reflections on Ageing and Technology. In Ageing and Technology Perspectives from Social Science, Emma Dominguez-Rue and Linda Nierling (eds.). transcript-Verlag, 311--334.

[2]

Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other." In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19), ACM, Glasgow, Scotland UK, 1--13.

Digital Library

[3]

Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar and Andrea Grimes Parker. 2016. Confidence & Control: Examining Adolescent Preferences for Technologies that Promote Wellness. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), ACM, San Francisco, CA, 160--171.

Digital Library

[4]

Mark Blythe, Andrew Monk, and Jisoo Park. 2002. Technology biographies: field study techniques for home use product development. In CHI'02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 658--659.

[5]

Eva Brandt, Thomas Binder, Lone Malmborg, and Tomas Sokoler. 2010. Communities of Everyday Practice and Situated Elderliness as an Approach to Co-Design for Senior Interaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI 2010), ACM, Brisbane, Australia, 400--403.

Digital Library

[6]

Stacy M. Branham, Anja Thieme, Lisa P. Nathan, Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Co-creating & identity-making in CSCW: Revisiting Ethics in Design Research. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), ACM, Baltimore, MD, 305--308.

Digital Library

[7]

Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2016. Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design. Comput. Support. Coop. Work CSCW An Int. J. 25, 6 (2016), 425--475.

[8]

John M Carroll, Gregorio Convertino, Umer Farooq, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2012. The Firekeepers: Aging Considered as a Resource. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11, 1 (2012), 7--15.

[9]

John W Creswell and Cheryl N Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[10]

Sara J. Czaja and Chin Chin Lee. 2007. The impact of aging on access to technology. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 5, 4 (2007), 341--349.

Digital Library

[11]

Rikke Friis Dam and Teo Yu Siang. Define and Frame Your Design Challenge by Creating Your Point Of View and Ask "How Might We." Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/define-and-frame-your-design-challenge-by-creating-your-point-of-view-and-ask-how-might-we#: :text=?We use the How Might,perfect frame for innovative thinking."

[12]

Rikke Friis Dam and Teo Yu Siang. 2020. Introduction to the Essential Ideation Techniques which are the Heart of Design Thinking. Retrieved March 4, 2021 from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/introduction-to-the-essential-ideation-techniques-which-are-the-heart-of-design-thinking

[13]

Jennifer L. Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. Participatory Design with Older Adults?: An Analysis of Creativity in the Design of Mobile Healthcare Applications. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (C&C '13), ACM, Sydney, NSW, 114--123.

Digital Library

[14]

Jennifer L. Davidson and Carlos Jensen. 2013. What health topics older adults want to track:A Participatory Design Study. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '13), ACM, Bellevue, WA, 1--8.

Digital Library

[15]

George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Geraldine Dickey, Marjorie Skubic, and Marilyn Rantz. 2008. Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technol. Heal. Care 16, 2 (2008), 111--118.

[16]

Allison Druin. 1999. Cooperative Inquiry: Developing New Technologies for Children with Children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99), ACM, Pittsburgh PA, 592--599.

Digital Library

[17]

Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inf. Technol. 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.

[18]

Hugh Dubberly. 2004. How do you design? Retrieved from http://www.dubberly.com/articles/how-do-you-design.html

[19]

Glen H. Elder, Monica Kirkpatrick Johnson, and Robert Crosnoe. 2003. The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. In Handbook of the Life Course, Jeylan T. Mortimer and Michael J. Shanahan (eds.). Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, New York, 3--19.

[20]

R. Darin Ellis and Sri H. Kurniawan. 2000. Increasing the Usability of Online Information for Older Users: A Case Study in Participatory Design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 12, 2 (June 2000), 263--276.

[21]

Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, and Joseph Sharit. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches (2nd ed.). CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fl.

[22]

Pin Sym Foong. 2016. The Value of the Life Course Perspective in the Design of Mobile Technologies for Older Adults. In Mobile Communication and the Family. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 165--181.

[23]

Rachel Franz, Leah Findlater, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2018. Lost in Transition: The Importance of Conceptualizing Aging as a Process in Accessibility Research. In CHI '18 Workshop on Designing Interactions for the Ageing Populations, ACM, Montreal, Canada, 53--58.

[24]

Susanne Frennert, Hakan Eftring, and Britt Ostlund. 2013. Older People's Involvement in the Development of a Social Assistive Robot. In Social Robotics. ICSR 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, G Hermann, M.J. Pearson, A Lenz, P Bremner, A Spiers and U Leonards (eds.). Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Digital Library

[25]

Andrew Furco. 1996. Service-Learning: A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education. In Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning, B Taylor (ed.). Corporation for National Service, Washington, DC, 2--6.

[26]

Paula Gardner and Rio Alegre. 2019. ?Just like us": Increasing Awareness, Prompting Action and Combating Ageism Through a Critical Intergenerational Service Learning Project. Educ. Gerontol. 45, 2 (2019), 146--158.

[27]

Markus Garschall, Theodor Hamm, Dominik Hornung, Claudia Muller, Katja Neureiter, Maren Schorch, and Lex van Velsen. 2016. Challenges and Experiences in Designing for an Ageing Society. Reflecting on Concepts of (Age)ing and Communication Practices. In International Reports on Socio-Informatics, Volkmar Pipek and Markus Rohde (eds.). IISI- International Institute for Socio-Informatics.

[28]

Irene A. Gutheil, Roslyn H. Chernesky, and Marian L. Sherratt. 2006. Influencing Student Attitudes Toward Older Adults: Results of a Service-Learning Collaboration. Educ. Gerontol. 32, 9 (October 2006), 771--784.

[29]

Lilit Hakobyan, Jo Lumsden, Dympna O'Sullivan, and Hannah Bartlett. 2013. Designing a Mobile Diet Diary Application with and for Older Adults with AMD: A Case Study. In 27th International British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference: The Internet of Things (HCI 2013), BCS L&D Ltd, 1--10.

[30]

John Halloran, Eva Hornecker, Mark Stringer, Eric Harris, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2009. The Value of Values: Resourcing Co-Design of Ubiquitous Computing. CoDesign 5, 4 (2009), 245--273.

[31]

Christina N. Harrington, Lauren Wilcox, Kay Connelly, Wendy Rogers, and Jon Sanford. Designing Health and Fitness Apps with Older Adults: Examining the Value of Experience-Based Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth '18), ACM, New York, 15--24.

Digital Library

[32]

Iolanda Iacono and Patrizia Marti. 2014. Engaging Older People with Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14), ACM, Helsinki, Finland, 859--864.

Digital Library

[33]

Suhas Govind Joshi and Tone Bratteteig. 2016. Designing for Prolonged Mastery. On Involving Old People in Participatory Design. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 28, 1 (2016), 3--36.

[34]

Hilary R. Kalisch, Deanna R. Coughlin, Sharon M. Ballard, and Angela Lamson. 2013. Old Age Is a Part of Living: Student Reflections on Intergenerational Service-Learning. Gerontol. Geriatr. Educ. 34, 1 (2013), 99--113.

[35]

Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design?: Issues and Concerns. Comput. Support. Coop. Work 7, (1998), 167--185.

Digital Library

[36]

Sitawa R. Kimuna, David Knox, and Marty Zusman. 2005. College Students' Perceptions About Older People and Aging. Educ. Gerontol. 31, 7 (2005), 563--572.

[37]

Radoslaw Nielek, and Adam Wierzbicki. 2018. Guidelines Towards Better Participation of Older Adults in Software Development Processes Using a New SPIRAL Method and Participatory Approach. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE '18), ACM, Gothenburg, Sweden, 49--56.

Digital Library

[38]

Herman Koppelman and Betsy Van Dijk. 2006. Creating a Realistic Context for Team Projects in HCI. In Proceedings of the 11th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITICSE '06), ACM, Bologna, Italy, 58--62.

Digital Library

[39]

Diana Kuh. 2007. A Life Course Approach to Healthy Aging, Frailty, and Capability. Journals Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 62, 7 (July 2007), 717--721.

[40]

Jonathan Lazar and Doris Lidtke. 2002. Service-Learning Partnerships in the Information Systems Curriculum. In Managing IT/Community Partnerships in the 21st Century. 1--16.

[41]

Young Shin Lee. 2009. Measures of student attitudes on aging. Educ. Gerontol. 35, 2 (2009), 121--134.

[42]

Ann Light, Tuck W Leong, and Toni Roberston. 2015. Ageing Well with CSCW. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2015), Springer International Publishing Switzerland, Oslo, Norway, 19--23.

[43]

Stephen Lindsay, Daniel Jackson, Guy Schofield, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Engaging Older People Using Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM, Austin, Texas, 1199--1208.

Digital Library

[44]

Jennifer Mankoff. 2006. Practical Service Learning Issues in HCI. In CHI '06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (CHI EA '06), ACM, Montreal, Qubec, Canada, 201--206.

Digital Library

[45]

Aqueasha Martin-Hammond, Sravani Vemireddy, and Kartik Rao. 2018. Engaging Older Adults in the Participatory Design of Intelligent Health Search Tools. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, ACM, New York, 280--284.

Digital Library

[46]

Michael Massimi, Ronald M. Baecker, and Michael Wu. 2007. Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '07), ACM, Tempe, Arizona, 155--162.

Digital Library

[47]

Judith C. McHenry, Kathleen C. Insel, Gilles O. Einstein, Amy N. Vidrine, Kari M. Koerner, and Daniel G. Morrow. 2015. Recruitment of Older Adults: Success May be in the Details. Gerontologist 55, 5 (2015), 845--853.

[48]

Sebastian Merkel and Alexander Kucharski. 2019. Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: A Systematic Literature Review. Gerontologist 59, 1 (2019), E16--E25.

[49]

Lasserre Patricia. 2011. Service learning. In Proceedings of the 16th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE '11), ACM, Prince George, Canada, 12--16.

Digital Library

[50]

Alexander Peine, Ingo Rollwagen, and Louis Neven. 2014. The rise of the "innosumer"-Rethinking Older Technology Users. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 82, 1 (2014), 199--214.

[51]

Jeffrey M. Penick, Marte Fallshore, and Adrian M. Spencer. 2014. Using Intergenerational Service Learning to Promote Positive Perceptions about Older Adults and Community Service in College Students. J. Intergener. Relatsh. 12, 1 (2014), 25--39.

[52]

Anne Marie Piper and James D. Hollan. 2008. Supporting Medical Conversations Between Deaf and Hearing Individuals with Tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW '08), ACM, San Diego, California, 147--156.

Digital Library

[53]

Alisha Pradhan, Ben Jelen, Katie A Siek, Joel Chan, and Amanda Lazar. 2020. Understanding Older Adults' Participation in Design Workshops. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '20), ACM, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Digital Library

[54]

Yvonne Rogers, Jeni Paay, and Margot Brereton. 2014. Never Too Old: Engaging Retired People Inventing the Future with MaKey MaKey. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), ACM, Toronto, ON Canada, 3913--3922.

Digital Library

[55]

Wendy Roldan, Xin Gao, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Tiffany Ku, Ziyue Li, Echo Zhang, Jon E. Froehlich, and Jason Yip. 2020. Opportunities and Challenges in Involving Users in Project-Based HCI Education. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '2020), ACM, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1--15.

Digital Library

[56]

Wendy Roldan, Ziyue Li, Xin Gao, Sarah Kay Strickler, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Jon E. Froehlich, and Jason Yip. 2021. Pedagogical Strategies for Reflection in Project-Based HCI Education with End Users. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (DIS '21), ACM, Virtual Event, 1846--1860.

Digital Library

[57]

Wendy Roldan, Schawnery Lin, Yuxin Xu, Andrea Sequeira, and Jennifer Turns. 2020. Visual Note-taking: Opportunities to Support Student Agency in Active Learning. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online.

[58]

Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5--18.

[59]

Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph "Jofish" Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing Between Sense and Sensibility (CC '05), ACM, Arhus, Denmark, 49--58.

Digital Library

[60]

Richard A Settersten. 2017. Some Things I Have Learned About Aging by Studying the Life Course. Innov. Aging 1, 2 (2017).

[61]

Andrew K. Shenton. 2004. Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Educ. Inf. 22, 2 (2004), 63--75.

[62]

Lucy Suchman. 2011. Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 40, 2011 (2011), 1--18.

[63]

Shahida Sulaiman, Siti Julia Mohd Shahrol, and Abd Rahman Abd Samad. 2020. Service Learning in Application Development Course: A Case Study of a Rural Community Engagement. In Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications (ICSCA 2020), ACM, Langkawi, Malaysia, 158--162.

Digital Library

[64]

Jennifer Sumner, Lin Siew Chong, Anjali Bundele, and Yee Wei Lim. 2020. Co-Designing Technology for Aging in Place: A Systematic Review. Gerontologist (2020), 1--15.

[65]

Stephen Uzor, Lynne Baillie, and Dawn Skelton. 2012. Empowering Seniors to Design Enjoyable Falls Rehabilitation Tools Stephen. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM, Austin, Texas, 1179--1188.

Digital Library

[66]

John Vines, Rachel Clarke, and Peter Wright. 2013. Configuring Participation: On How We Involve People in Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM, Paris, France, 429--438.

[67]

John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput. Interact. 22, 1 (March 2015), 1--27.

Digital Library

[68]

Greg Walsh, Elizabeth Foss, Jason Yip, and Allison Druin. 2013. FACIT PD: A Framework for Analysis and Creation of Intergenerational Techniques for Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM, Paris, France, 2893--2902.

Digital Library

[69]

Greg Walsh and Eric Wronsky. 2019. AI + Co-Design: Developing a Novel Computer-supported Approach to Inclusive Design. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '19), ACM, Austin, Texas, 408--412.

Digital Library

[70]

Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Lars Kulik, Elizabeth Ozanne, Alan Gruner, and John Downs. 2013. Older adults as Digital Content Producers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13), ACM, Paris, France, 39--48.

Digital Library

[71]

Ron Weber. 2004. Editor's Comments: The Rhetoric of Positivism versus Interpretivism: A Personal View.

[72]

Jason C. Yip, Elizabeth Foss, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Mona Leigh Guha, Leyla Norooz, Emily Rhodes, Brenna McNally, Panagis Papadatos, Evan Golub, and Allison Druin. 2013. Children Initiating and Leading Cooperative Inquiry Sessions. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, ACM, New York, 293--296.

Digital Library

[73]

Jason C. Yip, Kung Jin Lee, and Jin Ha Lee. 2019. Design Partnerships for Participatory Librarianship: A Conceptual Model for Understanding Librarians Co Designing with Digital Youth. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 71, 10 (2019), 1242--1256.

Digital Library

[74]

Jason C Yip, Kiley Sobel, Caroline Pitt, Kung Jin Lee, Sijin Chen, Kari Nasu, and Laura R Pina. 2017. Examining Adult-Child Interactions in Intergenerational Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), ACM, Denver, CO, 5742--5754.

Digital Library

Cited By

McCaffrey LMcCann BGiné-Garriga MAn QCardon GChastin SChrifou RLippke SLoisel QLongworth GMessiha KVogelsang MWhyte EDall P(2025)Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts: A Health CASCADE scoping reviewPublic Health10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002238(29-36)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
Ostrowski AZhang JBreazeal CPark H(2024)Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adultsFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.128941411Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1289414
Palmier CRigaud AOgawa TWieching RDacunha SBarbarossa FStara VBevilacqua RPino M(2024)Identification of Ethical Issues and Practice Recommendations Regarding the Use of Robotic Coaching Solutions for Older Adults: Narrative ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4812626(e48126)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/48126
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Co-Design with Older Adults: Examining and Reflecting on Collaboration with Aging Communities
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design process and methods
      1. User centered design
2. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Participatory design with older adults: an analysis of creativity in the design of mobile healthcare applications
C&C '13: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition

Researchers often use participatory design -- involving endusers in technology ideation -- as this is found to lead to more useful and relevant products. Researchers have sought to involve older adults in the design of emerging technologies like ...
Recruiting Older Adults in the Wild: Reflections on Challenges and Lessons Learned from Research Experience
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

It is important to understand the older adults prior to the design process. The understanding can better facilitate design conversations between the researchers and the older adults. In this paper, we discussed our experiences of building a relationship ...
Older adults and hackathons: a qualitative study

Globally observed trends in aging indicate that older adults constitute a growing share of the population and an increasing demographic in the modern technologies marketplace. Therefore, it has become important to address the issue of participation of ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

CSCW2

October 2021

5376 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3493286

Editor:
Jeff Nichols
Apple Inc., United States

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2021 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 October 2021

Published in PACMHCI Volume 5, Issue CSCW2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Funding Sources

National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

30
Total Citations
View Citations
1,349
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)563
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)60

Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

McCaffrey LMcCann BGiné-Garriga MAn QCardon GChastin SChrifou RLippke SLoisel QLongworth GMessiha KVogelsang MWhyte EDall P(2025)Co-creation experiences among adults in diverse contexts: A Health CASCADE scoping reviewPublic Health10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002238(29-36)Online publication date: Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2024.11.002
Ostrowski AZhang JBreazeal CPark H(2024)Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adultsFrontiers in Robotics and AI10.3389/frobt.2024.128941411Online publication date: 24-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1289414
Palmier CRigaud AOgawa TWieching RDacunha SBarbarossa FStara VBevilacqua RPino M(2024)Identification of Ethical Issues and Practice Recommendations Regarding the Use of Robotic Coaching Solutions for Older Adults: Narrative ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4812626(e48126)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.2196/48126
Wang GChang FGu ZKasraian Dvan Wesemael P(2024)Co-designing community-level integral interventions for active ageing: a systematic review from the lens of community-based participatory researchBMC Public Health10.1186/s12889-024-18195-524:1Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18195-5
Hjorth LSheahan JFigueiredo BMartin DReid MAleti TBuschgens M(2024)Playing with persona: Highlighting older adults’ lived experience with the digital mediaConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/13548565241247415Online publication date: 8-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241247415
Chopra SOrii LJuarez KTieanklin NFogarty JMunson S(2024)Menopause Legacies: Designing to Record and Share Experiences of Menopause Across GenerationsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36869758:CSCW2(1-37)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686975
Sheahan JCardamone EVines J(2024)Exploring Generative Postcard Futures with Older AdultsAdjunct Proceedings of the 2024 Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3677045.3685502(1-6)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3677045.3685502
Wang SCarmeline AKolko BMunson S(2024)Understanding the Role of Technology in Older Adults' Changing Social Support NetworksProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36410278:CSCW1(1-28)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3641027
Willatt AGray SManchester HFoster TCater K(2024)An Intersectional Lifecourse Lens and Participatory Methods as the Foundations for Co-Designing with and for Minoritised Older AdultsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372958:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637295
Grimme SSpoerl SBoll SKoelle M(2024)My Data, My Choice, My Insights: Women's Requirements when Collecting, Interpreting and Sharing their Personal Health DataProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642851(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642851
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Issue’s Table of Contents