Mark Beeson is an Adjunct Professor at the University of Technology Sydney. Before joining UTS in 2022, he he taught at the University of Western Australia, Murdoch, Griffith, Queensland, York (UK) and Birmingham, where he was also head of department. Mark’s work is centred on the politics, economics and security of the broadly conceived Asia-Pacific region. He is the author of more than 200 journal articles and book chapters, and the founding editor of Critical Studies of the Asia Pacific (Palgrave). Address: Australia-China Relations Institute (ACRI)
Despite systemic internal and external differences, Australia and China have shown striking simil... more Despite systemic internal and external differences, Australia and China have shown striking similarities in their pursuit of disputed maritime resource and jurisdictional claims. This high-stakes area of international politics is governed by a codified, globally accepted international legal regime (the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), making it an important case for examining the relationship between states' foreign policies and the 'rules-based international order'. In the South China Sea, Beijing is haunted by the legacy of its strong geopolitically driven support for an expansive law of the sea regime in the 1970s. Strategic considerations also drove Australia's belated embrace of international legal processes in the Timor Sea in 2016. Before that, successive Australian governments had been as keen to pursue national
If successfully realised, the Belt and Road Initiative will be the most ambitious and expansive d... more If successfully realised, the Belt and Road Initiative will be the most ambitious and expansive developmental project the world has ever seen. It is not, however, unprecedented. In the aftermath of the Second World War the United States developed what was then an equally unprecedented and ambitious initiative designed to simultaneously facilitate the (re)development of some of the world’s key economies and reinforce its own position as the leader of the western world. Both the American Marshall Plan and China’s BRI are important expressions of geoeconomic influence and power. This paper compares the two projects from the perspectives of ‘hegemonic transitions’ and ‘comparative hegemony’ in order to highlight some striking similarities and noteworthy differences, and gauge the prospects for the BRI and its possible scenarios. Comparatively speaking, the BRI does not have the same sort of compelling geopolitical imperatives and narrative that the emerging Cold War provided for America...
Transcultural Connections: Australia and China, , 2021
It is uncontroversial to suggest that the bilateral relationship between Australia and China is n... more It is uncontroversial to suggest that the bilateral relationship between Australia and China is not in good shape. Most explanations of deteriorating ties have focused on the tension between potentially conflicting strategic and economic interests. Understandable as this may be, I suggest that these analyses typically miss an even larger problem that will eventually define this relationship—and every other one that each country has. I refer, of course, to unmitigated climate change, which threatens to overturn the extant international order and usher in a new era of conflict and contestation if not addressed. Unlikely as it might seem at present, I suggest that cooperation between Australia and China around energy and environmental problems could provide the sort of ‘win-win’ cooperation that it often invoked but seldom seen.
Australia’s ‘strategic culture’ encourages security analysts and the policymakers they advise to ... more Australia’s ‘strategic culture’ encourages security analysts and the policymakers they advise to prioritise improbable traditional threats from other states, rather than the very real, immediate and increasingly visible danger posed by unmitigated climate change. The concomitant ‘opportunity costs’ of this sort of thinking, I argue, are immense, unjustifiable and, if they continue, likely to culminate in economic, political, social and—yes—even traditional security crises as the world descends into a Darwinian struggle for survival. I develop this rather deflating but all- too-plausible thesis by firstly looking at the general relationship between security and the environment, and then by considering the consequences of Australian policymakers’ short-sighted and self-absorbed approach to the greatest collective action problem the world has ever faced.
At a time when the world faces a number of complex problems that transcend national borders and w... more At a time when the world faces a number of complex problems that transcend national borders and which individual states appear unable to address on their own, multilateralism ought to matter more than ever. All too often, however, at- tempts to encourage collaborative and effective responses to transnational prob- lems are unable to overcome national interests, or lack the capacity to address novel challenges that defy easy resolution. Despite the urgent need for interna- tional cooperation, it is often conspicuous by its absence and it is not unreason- able to ask, does multilateralism really matter anymore? We argue that it does, if only because, there is no alternative. To illustrate multilateralism's weaknesses and potential strengths we provide a novel comparison of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Arctic Council, which reveals the importance of history, diplomatic styles, the significance of issue areas, and the motivations of members. The two bodies literally and metaphorically illustrate developments in the North and South, and provide a novel and revealing bench- mark for measuring the success of multilateral bodies at different moments in history.
What do responsible environmental behaviour and practice look like, especially for those of us wh... more What do responsible environmental behaviour and practice look like, especially for those of us who despair of effective policies being enacted by the current generation of political elites? This paper provides a personal response to the ethical and policy dilemma of our times. I attempt to explain what may seem like-and possibly is-entirely self-indulgent behaviour on the basis that I can make absolutely no difference at the sort of macro level that is needed to 'save the planet'. In the process I try to explain why thousands of others have made similar choices and why cooperation even amongst well-intentioned and informed individuals is so hard and unlikely to succeed.
Surprising and instructive differences are evident in the way policymakers in East Asia and Weste... more Surprising and instructive differences are evident in the way policymakers in East Asia and Western Europe have responded to seemingly similar challenges of climate change and energy security. At the most general level, the approach of East Asia’s major powers to energy security in particular has been described as ‘neo-mercantilist’ and driven by national policies that don’t encourage transnational levels of cooperation. In Europe, by contrast, a more effective institutional infrastructure, coupled with an increasingly activist civil society, has meant that the EU has been at the forefront of global policy innovation. The contrast with Asia is equally noteworthy in the area of energy policy, where geopolitics and relations with Russia in particular have made coordination and security more elusive, with strongly diverging visions, aims and objectives of (energy) security among EU member states. The chapter concludes both by highlighting the differences and by identifying the potentia...
One of the more striking, surprising, and optimism-inducing features of the contemporary internat... more One of the more striking, surprising, and optimism-inducing features of the contemporary international system has been the decline of interstate war. The key question for students of international relations and comparative politics is how this happy state of affairs came about. In short, was this a universal phenomenon or did some regions play a more important and pioneering role in bringing about peaceful change? As part of the roundtable “International Institutions and Peaceful Change,” this essay suggests that Western Europe generally and the European Union in particular played pivotal roles in transforming the international system and the behavior of policymakers. This helped to create the material and ideational conditions in which other parts of the world could replicate this experience, making war less likely and peaceful change more feasible. This argument is developed by comparing the experiences of the EU and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and their respective ...
Ce texte cherche a analyser les capacites de la Chine a faire face aux enjeux environnementaux et... more Ce texte cherche a analyser les capacites de la Chine a faire face aux enjeux environnementaux et climatiques domestiques, mais egalement internationaux, compte tenu de son poids propre. Elle est confrontee aux memes difficultes et contradictions que les pays capitalistes liberaux avec, probablement, une force d’entrainement plus forte du pouvoir central sur le reste de la societe.
Journal of International Relations and Development, 2021
China’s unprecedented economic rise has generated great interest, not least because it seems to h... more China’s unprecedented economic rise has generated great interest, not least because it seems to have occurred by studiously ignoring the ‘lessons’ of the Western experience and the advice of hitherto influential external agencies. On the contrary, the ‘China model’ owes more to an East Asian developmental model in which the state has played a large role. As a consequence, we argue that China is proving to be a more attractive role model for other rising economies such as Vietnam, which is also a notionally ‘communist’ state. This paper considers the Chinese experience and its possible implications for Vietnam. The key questions in this context are how China managed its integration with the global capitalist economy and whether other states such as Vietnam will also be able to manage their development according to distinctive national priorities, rather than the sort of international ‘best practice’ that has been urged upon its leaders by external actors. We argue that not only is Vi...
The international order created under the auspices of “American hegemony” appears to be unravelin... more The international order created under the auspices of “American hegemony” appears to be unraveling during the erratic and nationalistic leadership of Donald Trump, and the growing geopolitical and geoeconomic competition between the United States and China. Many commentators fear that such tensions will lead to the demise of the so-called rules-based international order in particular, and to the declining influence of values, principles and norms associated with “the West” in general. This paper analyses these developments by putting them in historical context, considering what was distinctive about the “rise of the West”, and explaining why the relative decline of American influence may prove so consequential. The key questions that animate the discussion are: what is at stake in the possible decline of the West? Does the rise of China presage the emergence of a very different sort of international order than the one currently dominant?
Neoliberal institutionalists frequently see regional organisations such as the EU, ASEAN or the E... more Neoliberal institutionalists frequently see regional organisations such as the EU, ASEAN or the EAS as expressions of the desire for economic integration, political cooperation and the resolution of collective action problems. In this formulation, the creation of inclusive regional identities is seen as one of the potentially desirable consequences of institution-building. The Indo-Pacific, by contrast, has since its inception been driven by a rather old-fashioned concern with the balance of power in a part of the world in which China is once again playing a dominant and destabilising role. We argue that realists still have much to tell us about the material forces that are not only transforming the region—however, it is defined—but also which underpin the rise to prominence of the Indo-Pacific idea in particular. The so-called ‘Quad’ countries are both the main drivers of the Indo-Pacific concept and a clear manifestation of its underlying goals and principles. In such circumstances, we argue, the Indo-Pacific is unlikely to reproduce even the rather modest levels of institutionalisation achieved by other organisations, primarily because this vision of the region is one that is not intended to address the sorts of collective action problems neoliberal institutionalists highlight. On the contrary, the Indo-Pacific rescales the region to include India and strategically aligns certain regional states in an old-fashioned quasi-alliance to the strategic threat posed by China.
The European Union’s Security Relations with Asian Partners, 2021
It is not only the possible relative decline of the United States as the bedrock of the so-called... more It is not only the possible relative decline of the United States as the bedrock of the so-called ‘rules-based international order’ (RBIO) in the Trump era that has caused consternation in Europe and Asia. The international system has also been shaken by a number of rising powers that are often less wedded to the norms and principles of the old RBIO. Changes in the underlying structures of the international order, as well as the ideas and practices that were associated with American dominance, present a major challenge for policymakers everywhere. This chapter compares the responses in Europe and East Asia to similar challenges because they highlight the different historical circumstances and capacities that will shape policies of adjustment in both regions. Geopolitical and newly important geoeconomic forces are both constraining and empowering different actors in a period of dramatic transformation
Despite systemic internal and external differences, Australia and China have shown striking simil... more Despite systemic internal and external differences, Australia and China have shown striking similarities in their pursuit of disputed maritime resource and jurisdictional claims. This high-stakes area of international politics is governed by a codified, globally accepted international legal regime (the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea), making it an important case for examining the relationship between states' foreign policies and the 'rules-based international order'. In the South China Sea, Beijing is haunted by the legacy of its strong geopolitically driven support for an expansive law of the sea regime in the 1970s. Strategic considerations also drove Australia's belated embrace of international legal processes in the Timor Sea in 2016. Before that, successive Australian governments had been as keen to pursue national
If successfully realised, the Belt and Road Initiative will be the most ambitious and expansive d... more If successfully realised, the Belt and Road Initiative will be the most ambitious and expansive developmental project the world has ever seen. It is not, however, unprecedented. In the aftermath of the Second World War the United States developed what was then an equally unprecedented and ambitious initiative designed to simultaneously facilitate the (re)development of some of the world’s key economies and reinforce its own position as the leader of the western world. Both the American Marshall Plan and China’s BRI are important expressions of geoeconomic influence and power. This paper compares the two projects from the perspectives of ‘hegemonic transitions’ and ‘comparative hegemony’ in order to highlight some striking similarities and noteworthy differences, and gauge the prospects for the BRI and its possible scenarios. Comparatively speaking, the BRI does not have the same sort of compelling geopolitical imperatives and narrative that the emerging Cold War provided for America...
Transcultural Connections: Australia and China, , 2021
It is uncontroversial to suggest that the bilateral relationship between Australia and China is n... more It is uncontroversial to suggest that the bilateral relationship between Australia and China is not in good shape. Most explanations of deteriorating ties have focused on the tension between potentially conflicting strategic and economic interests. Understandable as this may be, I suggest that these analyses typically miss an even larger problem that will eventually define this relationship—and every other one that each country has. I refer, of course, to unmitigated climate change, which threatens to overturn the extant international order and usher in a new era of conflict and contestation if not addressed. Unlikely as it might seem at present, I suggest that cooperation between Australia and China around energy and environmental problems could provide the sort of ‘win-win’ cooperation that it often invoked but seldom seen.
Australia’s ‘strategic culture’ encourages security analysts and the policymakers they advise to ... more Australia’s ‘strategic culture’ encourages security analysts and the policymakers they advise to prioritise improbable traditional threats from other states, rather than the very real, immediate and increasingly visible danger posed by unmitigated climate change. The concomitant ‘opportunity costs’ of this sort of thinking, I argue, are immense, unjustifiable and, if they continue, likely to culminate in economic, political, social and—yes—even traditional security crises as the world descends into a Darwinian struggle for survival. I develop this rather deflating but all- too-plausible thesis by firstly looking at the general relationship between security and the environment, and then by considering the consequences of Australian policymakers’ short-sighted and self-absorbed approach to the greatest collective action problem the world has ever faced.
At a time when the world faces a number of complex problems that transcend national borders and w... more At a time when the world faces a number of complex problems that transcend national borders and which individual states appear unable to address on their own, multilateralism ought to matter more than ever. All too often, however, at- tempts to encourage collaborative and effective responses to transnational prob- lems are unable to overcome national interests, or lack the capacity to address novel challenges that defy easy resolution. Despite the urgent need for interna- tional cooperation, it is often conspicuous by its absence and it is not unreason- able to ask, does multilateralism really matter anymore? We argue that it does, if only because, there is no alternative. To illustrate multilateralism's weaknesses and potential strengths we provide a novel comparison of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Arctic Council, which reveals the importance of history, diplomatic styles, the significance of issue areas, and the motivations of members. The two bodies literally and metaphorically illustrate developments in the North and South, and provide a novel and revealing bench- mark for measuring the success of multilateral bodies at different moments in history.
What do responsible environmental behaviour and practice look like, especially for those of us wh... more What do responsible environmental behaviour and practice look like, especially for those of us who despair of effective policies being enacted by the current generation of political elites? This paper provides a personal response to the ethical and policy dilemma of our times. I attempt to explain what may seem like-and possibly is-entirely self-indulgent behaviour on the basis that I can make absolutely no difference at the sort of macro level that is needed to 'save the planet'. In the process I try to explain why thousands of others have made similar choices and why cooperation even amongst well-intentioned and informed individuals is so hard and unlikely to succeed.
Surprising and instructive differences are evident in the way policymakers in East Asia and Weste... more Surprising and instructive differences are evident in the way policymakers in East Asia and Western Europe have responded to seemingly similar challenges of climate change and energy security. At the most general level, the approach of East Asia’s major powers to energy security in particular has been described as ‘neo-mercantilist’ and driven by national policies that don’t encourage transnational levels of cooperation. In Europe, by contrast, a more effective institutional infrastructure, coupled with an increasingly activist civil society, has meant that the EU has been at the forefront of global policy innovation. The contrast with Asia is equally noteworthy in the area of energy policy, where geopolitics and relations with Russia in particular have made coordination and security more elusive, with strongly diverging visions, aims and objectives of (energy) security among EU member states. The chapter concludes both by highlighting the differences and by identifying the potentia...
One of the more striking, surprising, and optimism-inducing features of the contemporary internat... more One of the more striking, surprising, and optimism-inducing features of the contemporary international system has been the decline of interstate war. The key question for students of international relations and comparative politics is how this happy state of affairs came about. In short, was this a universal phenomenon or did some regions play a more important and pioneering role in bringing about peaceful change? As part of the roundtable “International Institutions and Peaceful Change,” this essay suggests that Western Europe generally and the European Union in particular played pivotal roles in transforming the international system and the behavior of policymakers. This helped to create the material and ideational conditions in which other parts of the world could replicate this experience, making war less likely and peaceful change more feasible. This argument is developed by comparing the experiences of the EU and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and their respective ...
Ce texte cherche a analyser les capacites de la Chine a faire face aux enjeux environnementaux et... more Ce texte cherche a analyser les capacites de la Chine a faire face aux enjeux environnementaux et climatiques domestiques, mais egalement internationaux, compte tenu de son poids propre. Elle est confrontee aux memes difficultes et contradictions que les pays capitalistes liberaux avec, probablement, une force d’entrainement plus forte du pouvoir central sur le reste de la societe.
Journal of International Relations and Development, 2021
China’s unprecedented economic rise has generated great interest, not least because it seems to h... more China’s unprecedented economic rise has generated great interest, not least because it seems to have occurred by studiously ignoring the ‘lessons’ of the Western experience and the advice of hitherto influential external agencies. On the contrary, the ‘China model’ owes more to an East Asian developmental model in which the state has played a large role. As a consequence, we argue that China is proving to be a more attractive role model for other rising economies such as Vietnam, which is also a notionally ‘communist’ state. This paper considers the Chinese experience and its possible implications for Vietnam. The key questions in this context are how China managed its integration with the global capitalist economy and whether other states such as Vietnam will also be able to manage their development according to distinctive national priorities, rather than the sort of international ‘best practice’ that has been urged upon its leaders by external actors. We argue that not only is Vi...
The international order created under the auspices of “American hegemony” appears to be unravelin... more The international order created under the auspices of “American hegemony” appears to be unraveling during the erratic and nationalistic leadership of Donald Trump, and the growing geopolitical and geoeconomic competition between the United States and China. Many commentators fear that such tensions will lead to the demise of the so-called rules-based international order in particular, and to the declining influence of values, principles and norms associated with “the West” in general. This paper analyses these developments by putting them in historical context, considering what was distinctive about the “rise of the West”, and explaining why the relative decline of American influence may prove so consequential. The key questions that animate the discussion are: what is at stake in the possible decline of the West? Does the rise of China presage the emergence of a very different sort of international order than the one currently dominant?
Neoliberal institutionalists frequently see regional organisations such as the EU, ASEAN or the E... more Neoliberal institutionalists frequently see regional organisations such as the EU, ASEAN or the EAS as expressions of the desire for economic integration, political cooperation and the resolution of collective action problems. In this formulation, the creation of inclusive regional identities is seen as one of the potentially desirable consequences of institution-building. The Indo-Pacific, by contrast, has since its inception been driven by a rather old-fashioned concern with the balance of power in a part of the world in which China is once again playing a dominant and destabilising role. We argue that realists still have much to tell us about the material forces that are not only transforming the region—however, it is defined—but also which underpin the rise to prominence of the Indo-Pacific idea in particular. The so-called ‘Quad’ countries are both the main drivers of the Indo-Pacific concept and a clear manifestation of its underlying goals and principles. In such circumstances, we argue, the Indo-Pacific is unlikely to reproduce even the rather modest levels of institutionalisation achieved by other organisations, primarily because this vision of the region is one that is not intended to address the sorts of collective action problems neoliberal institutionalists highlight. On the contrary, the Indo-Pacific rescales the region to include India and strategically aligns certain regional states in an old-fashioned quasi-alliance to the strategic threat posed by China.
The European Union’s Security Relations with Asian Partners, 2021
It is not only the possible relative decline of the United States as the bedrock of the so-called... more It is not only the possible relative decline of the United States as the bedrock of the so-called ‘rules-based international order’ (RBIO) in the Trump era that has caused consternation in Europe and Asia. The international system has also been shaken by a number of rising powers that are often less wedded to the norms and principles of the old RBIO. Changes in the underlying structures of the international order, as well as the ideas and practices that were associated with American dominance, present a major challenge for policymakers everywhere. This chapter compares the responses in Europe and East Asia to similar challenges because they highlight the different historical circumstances and capacities that will shape policies of adjustment in both regions. Geopolitical and newly important geoeconomic forces are both constraining and empowering different actors in a period of dramatic transformation
What does it mean to be secure in the 21st century?
Mark Beeson argues that some of the most i... more What does it mean to be secure in the 21st century?
Mark Beeson argues that some of the most influential ideas about national and even global security reflect untenable, anachronistic strategic views that are simply no longer appropriate for contemporary international circumstances.
At a time when climate change poses an existential threat to the continuation of life itself, Beeson argues that there is an urgent need to rethink security priorities while we still can. Providing an explanation of the failures and dangers of the conventional wisdom, he outlines the case for a new approach that takes issues like environmental and human security seriously.
Rivalry and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific provides a comprehensive and accessible introduction ... more Rivalry and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific provides a comprehensive and accessible introduction to the most important strategic and economic region in the world. Asia-Pacific is a region that is undergoing a major transformation, largely as a consequence of the rise of China and its growing rivalry with the United States. Whatever happens in the Asia-Pacific will profoundly influence global events, not just regional ones. Looking ahead, the region's future direction — and even its name — is contested and uncertain. This two-volume reference work, by one of the world's leading analysts of regional affairs, places these events in historical context and considers what they may mean for future political, economic and strategic relations. By focusing on the United States, China and the region's most significant middle powers, the book explains why and how the Asia-Pacific has become the fulcrum of international events.
This book evaluates climate change and populism, two ideas that do not generally go together. The... more This book evaluates climate change and populism, two ideas that do not generally go together. The author argues that perhaps they should if policymakers are to be galvanized into action before it is too late. Although populism is usually associated with right-wing authoritarianism, there is growing interest in more progressive forms of populist politics. Across the world, young people in particular are mobilizing to demand change from an older generation that appears to be incapable of action or is hostage to powerful vested interests and outdated ideas. In this book, the author explains why populist forms of political action may yet provide the key to effective policies, which are often discussed but less frequently implemented. Accessible and trenchantly argued, this book presents a primer for the politics of survival.
The world currently faces a number of challenges that no single country can solve. Whether it is ... more The world currently faces a number of challenges that no single country can solve. Whether it is managing a crisis-prone global economy, maintaining peace and stability, or trying to do something about climate change, there are some problems that necessitate collective action on the part of states and other actors. Global governance would seem functionally necessary and normatively desirable, but it is proving increasingly difficult to provide. This accessible introduction to, and analysis of, contemporary global governance explains what it is and the obstacles to its realization. Paying particular attention to the possible decline of American influence and the rise of China and a number of other actors, Mark Beeson explains why cooperation is proving difficult, despite its obvious need and desirability.
The world currently faces a number of challenges that no single country can solve. Whether it is ... more The world currently faces a number of challenges that no single country can solve. Whether it is managing a crisis-prone global economy, maintaining peace and stability, or trying to do something about climate change, there are some problems that necessitate collective action on the part of states and other actors. Global governance would seem functionally necessary and normatively desirable, but it is proving increasingly difficult to provide. This accessible introduction to, and analysis of, contemporary global governance explains what it is and the obstacles to its realization. Paying particular attention to the possible decline of American influence and the rise of China and a number of other actors, Mark Beeson explains why cooperation is proving difficult, despite its obvious need and desirability.
The twelfth volume in this definitive series on Australia’s foreign policy charts Australian fore... more The twelfth volume in this definitive series on Australia’s foreign policy charts Australian foreign policymakers’ efforts to navigate an increasingly unpredictable international environment. A shifting environment in which established and long-held Australian conceptions of international politics appear to be challenged due to the rise of China and the intensification of a host of ‘non-traditional’ security concerns, such as Islamic State, climate change and, for some, irregular migration. It describes the years between 2011 and 2015, a period of considerable domestic political instability in which Australia had four prime ministers, two removed by their own parties, and three foreign ministers, as characterised by economic and security volatility, globally and regionally – ‘the old order is dying, the new struggling to be born’. The thematic chapters cover and analyse major developments in important areas of foreign policy and are written by some of the foremost experts working in Australia today. It is a valuable resource for specialists, students and interested readers alike, seeking to understand the forces shaping Australian foreign policy in our time.
Features
Includes 14 thematic chapters covering all of the major areas of Australian foreign policy providing readers with a comprehensive view of Australian foreign policymaking today.
Encompasses major events in Australian politics and foreign policy 2011-15 providing readers with a quick reference tool for locating major events.
Chronology of Australia’s Foreign Policy and Political Events 2011–2015 List of Australian Prime Ministers and Foreign Affairs, Trade and Defence Ministers, 2011–15.
Has China's much-discussed "charm offensive" come to an end? Are fears about the country's more a... more Has China's much-discussed "charm offensive" come to an end? Are fears about the country's more assertive foreign policies justified? How will a rising China interact with its regional neighbors? Mark Beeson and Fujian Li address these questions by comprehensively exploring the nature, effectiveness, and implications of China's foreign policy strategy in Asia and Australia.
Review
'Beeson and Stubbs’ important volume brings together a group of leading specialists on Asi... more Review 'Beeson and Stubbs’ important volume brings together a group of leading specialists on Asia-Pacific regionalism. It is distinguished not just by the breadth of its coverage of regional institutions—both economic and security—but of the context in which they have evolved and the main challenges they face.' Professor John Ravenhill, Australian National University.
Description: The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism is a definitive introduction to, and analysis of, the development of regionalism in Asia, including coverage of East Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia. The contributors engage in a comprehensive exploration of what is arguably the most dynamic and important region in the world. Significantly, this volume addresses the multiple manifestations of regionalism in Asia and is consequently organised thematically under the headings of:
conceptualizing the region economic issues political issues strategic issues regional organizations As such, the Handbook presents some of the key elements of the competing interpretations of this important and highly contested topic, giving the reader a chance to evaluate not just where Asian regionalism is going but also how the scholarship on Asian regionalism is analysing these trends and events.
This book will be an indispensable resource for students and scholars of Asian politics, international relations and regionalism.
The Asia-Pacific is arguably the most important, but also the most complex and contested, region ... more The Asia-Pacific is arguably the most important, but also the most complex and contested, region on the planet. Containing three of the world’s largest economies and some of its most important strategic relationships, the region’s capacity of regional elites to promote continuing economic development whilst simultaneously maintaining peace and stability will be one of the defining challenges of the twenty-first century international order.
Intuitively, we might expect regional institutions to play a major role in achieving this. Yet one of the most widely noted characteristics of the Asia-Pacific region has been its relatively modest levels of institutional development thus far. However, things are changing: as individual economies in the Asia-Pacific become more deeply integrated, there is a growing interest in developing and adding to the institutions that already exist.
Institutions of the Asia-Pacific examines how this region is developing, and what role established organisations like APEC and new bodies like ASEAN Plus Three are playing in this process. An expert in the field, Mark Beeson introduces the contested nature of the very region itself – should it be the ‘Asia-Pacific’ or ‘East Asia’ to which we pay most attention and expect to see most institutional development. By placing these developments in historical context, he reveals why the very definition of the region remains unsettled and why the political, economic and strategic relations of this remarkably diverse region remain fraught and difficult to manage.
"Review
"Combining intellectual rigor and contemporary focus, a wide-ranging portrait of the glo... more "Review
"Combining intellectual rigor and contemporary focus, a wide-ranging portrait of the global system bringing together leading scholars to reflect on the great changes underway in world politics." —Professor G. John Ikenberry, Princeton University
"This excellent and well integrated collection of high-quality chapters introduces and addresses the key questions that face the international system in the first half of the twenty-first century. Readable and engaging, it is a must buy for students of world politics." —Professor Michael Cox, London School of Economics
"[W]ell written, insightful, and tightly argued essays on important issues... address their subjects with keen analytic eyes that provide the reader with information, vision, and insights... [A]n important and useful book." - A.J. Waskey, Choice
Product
Description:
From climate change and financial crisis to new security challenges and the rise of new powers, this major text brings together specially-commissioned and carefully edited contributions by a range of leading scholars to provide a very accessible and genuinely global introduction to the key issues in international relations today."
"Review
The goal of books such as these is to highlight issues, offer food for thought and stir ... more "Review
The goal of books such as these is to highlight issues, offer food for thought and stir up discussion; the authors should therefore be commended for doing just that,... - Dzirhan Mahadzir, Contemporary Southeast Asia
Description
This book uniquely applies the security reform agenda to Southeast Asia. It investigates recent developments in civil-military relations in the region, looking in particular at the impact and utility of the agenda on the region and assessing whether it is likely to help make the region more stable and less prone to military interventions.
It provides an historical overview of the region’s civil-military relations and goes on to explore the dynamics of civil-military relations within the context of the security sector reform framework, focusing on the experiences of four of the region’s militaries: Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia. It argues that although regional militaries have not necessarily followed a ‘Western’ model, significant developments have occurred that are broadly in keeping with the security sector reform agenda, and which suggests that the prospects for stable civil-military relations are brighter than some sceptics believe."
This thoroughly updated new edition of an already popular text brings together specially-commissi... more This thoroughly updated new edition of an already popular text brings together specially-commissioned chapters by leading authorities, rigorously edited to ensure systematic coverage. It provides students with an accessible and up-to-date thematically-structured comparative introduction to Southeast Asia today.
The United States is now the most powerful nation in history, and this power has grown since Sept... more The United States is now the most powerful nation in history, and this power has grown since September 11, 2001, forcing nations around the globe to re-evaluate their relationships to the unipolar superpower.
Nowhere is this re-evaluation more important than in East Asia, a region that has been defined by American power since the Second World War. Indeed, despite America’s physical distance from East Asia, the United States has been a key player in the region since the nineteenth century, when it played a major role in opening up both Japan and China to the West.
This book details the changing nature of power relations in East Asia, and includes case studies on China, Japan, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Korea and Australia. It argues that there are a number of insights that can be drawn from various traditions which help to explain the complex, multi-dimensional nature of American power at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
Across the region, countries are being forced to come to terms with and accommodate America’s dominant position and its increasingly assertive foreign policy. History and contingent contemporary circumstances mean that the precise nature of bilateral relationships will be different. But whether the Bush Doctrine is having a salutary or destructive effect on the region or specific countries, it is something East Asia and the rest of the world will have to learn to live with.
It is becoming less and less controversial or eccentric to claim that endless economic expansion ... more It is becoming less and less controversial or eccentric to claim that endless economic expansion and consumption, of a sort that the United States has so successfully championed, is simply incompatible with life on a finite planet.
Nuked: The Submarine Fiasco that Sank Australia's Sovereignty. Anyone who doubts the accuracy of... more Nuked: The Submarine Fiasco that Sank Australia's Sovereignty. Anyone who doubts the accuracy of former Labor luminaries Paul Keating and Gareth Evans, who have argued that AUKUS is, as Keating put it, "the worst deal in all history", really ought to read this book.
In many ways the American capitalist economy has been a remarkable success story. But is it any l... more In many ways the American capitalist economy has been a remarkable success story. But is it any longer compatible with environmental or social stability. Should countries like Australia be so closely connected to it?
According to Matt Pottinger, 'a China expert and deputy national security adviser in the Trump Wh... more According to Matt Pottinger, 'a China expert and deputy national security adviser in the Trump White House…anyone who has entertained the idea of stable ties with Beijing is really smoking dope.' If that's what it takes, it might be time to light up.
Spaceship Earth remains a compelling metaphor for our collective reality. Unfortunately, our ship... more Spaceship Earth remains a compelling metaphor for our collective reality. Unfortunately, our ship looks as if it may have been made by an inter-galactic branch of Boeing.
One of the more noteworthy features of the recent Republican convention was the reverential recep... more One of the more noteworthy features of the recent Republican convention was the reverential reception of Donald Trump. Even before Trump’s brush with death, eighty per cent of evangelical Christians supported him. What does this say about their beliefs and motives?
I’m a great admirer of George Monbiot. As one of the The Guardian’s most prominent and influentia... more I’m a great admirer of George Monbiot. As one of the The Guardian’s most prominent and influential columnists he has long been a trenchant critic of neoliberalism, and an informed and persuasive commentator on key issues surrounding the environment and economic inequality in particular. This is what makes his most recent column on geopolitics and security such a surprising and rather depressing read.
Even some of the more thoughtful justifications of AUKUS are ultimately implausible as they ignor... more Even some of the more thoughtful justifications of AUKUS are ultimately implausible as they ignore real and immediate threats while inflating the significance of improbable dangers Australia can do little to address.
Albanese took office in 2022, Australia has returned to a more rational path of seeking pragmatic... more Albanese took office in 2022, Australia has returned to a more rational path of seeking pragmatic cooperation with China. Despite starting from a low base, the relationship between China and Australia has improved significantly, said Mark Beeson ((B Be ee es so on n)), an adjunct professor at the Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney, in an interview with Global Times ((G GT T)) reporters Xia Wenxin and Xing Xiaojing. Beeson also pointed out the great impact China-US relations has on the relationship between Beijing and Canberra, urging the Australian government to take a more independent approach in terms of foreign policy.
As the climate crisis accelerates and intensifies, it’s easy to despair about the possibility of ... more As the climate crisis accelerates and intensifies, it’s easy to despair about the possibility of any country taking the lead in ‘saving the planet’. And yet Xi Jinping at least says encouraging things. Should we take China seriously?
What would the world be like if Bernie sanders was currently the US president? Could things be mu... more What would the world be like if Bernie sanders was currently the US president? Could things be much worse domestically or for America's role in the world? Even raising such a question will induce eye-rolling amongst the people who currently make policy - despite it's frequently appalling consequences.
A recent poll conducted by The Guardian found that nearly twice as many people agreed with Paul K... more A recent poll conducted by The Guardian found that nearly twice as many people agreed with Paul Keating's suggestion that Australia should be an independent 'middle power' in Asia, rather than an ally of the United States. Perhaps the electorate are smarter than some of our political class seem to think.
It is entirely possible that the US may soon install a very different policy elite with very diff... more It is entirely possible that the US may soon install a very different policy elite with very different ideas about domestic and foreign policy.
Professor Mark Beeson details his run-ins with Australia's intelligence services and expresses hi... more Professor Mark Beeson details his run-ins with Australia's intelligence services and expresses his concern about what their ham-fisted approach could mean for our relationship with China.
The idea of state capture is usually associated with the global south, but Australia, and Western... more The idea of state capture is usually associated with the global south, but Australia, and Western Australia in particular, demonstrates that established democracies are far from immune. As the Australian Democracy Network explains, ‘a key element of state capture is the management of political parties both in government and opposition…a range of techniques are brought to bear to reward compliance and punish dissent, ensuring that even in a change of government, the whole infrastructure of state capture remains intact.’
Sometimes one event encapsulates the zeitgeist. Alexei Navalny's death from what are almost certa... more Sometimes one event encapsulates the zeitgeist. Alexei Navalny's death from what are almost certainly unnatural causes is one such moment.
Privileged people trying to save the world shouldn't be dismissed as bourgeois virtue signalling.... more Privileged people trying to save the world shouldn't be dismissed as bourgeois virtue signalling. There are worse things to signal and it could make a difference.
A suitably rational and empirically grounded argument can be made that, on the whole, things are ... more A suitably rational and empirically grounded argument can be made that, on the whole, things are getting better - only, it's hard to feel that way
Pressing trade deals that do little more than insulate American tech oligopolies from the laws an... more Pressing trade deals that do little more than insulate American tech oligopolies from the laws and regulations of Asian nations will not restore US primacy or counteract China's influence.
Theology has long been used to justify war. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, it's happening again in the ... more Theology has long been used to justify war. Unsurprisingly, perhaps, it's happening again in the Middle East.
One of the most enduring features of Australia’s foreign and strategic policies is the close rela... more One of the most enduring features of Australia’s foreign and strategic policies is the close relationship between this country and the United States. A number of other countries such as Britain and Japan also claim to have a ‘special relationship’ with the US, but no country has worked more assiduously to turn that rhetoric into reality. Indeed, it is difficult to think of a country that has made greater sacrifices of blood and treasure than Australia has on behalf of its American ally and notional security guarantor.
The rise of populists, a growing number of authoritarian regimes and an apparent loss of confiden... more The rise of populists, a growing number of authoritarian regimes and an apparent loss of confidence in democratic politicians have all contributed to the idea that democracy is in serious trouble.
What if the United States withdrew its strategic commitment to allies in the Indo-Pacific? Taking... more What if the United States withdrew its strategic commitment to allies in the Indo-Pacific? Taking that hypothesis seriously, Hugh White's latest essay, "Without America: Australia in the New Asia," suggests that Australia does not have any other option than engaging China—and neither does the rest of Asia.
Uploads
Mark Beeson argues that some of the most influential ideas about national and even global security reflect untenable, anachronistic strategic views that are simply no longer appropriate for contemporary international circumstances.
At a time when climate change poses an existential threat to the continuation of life itself, Beeson argues that there is an urgent need to rethink security priorities while we still can. Providing an explanation of the failures and dangers of the conventional wisdom, he outlines the case for a new approach that takes issues like environmental and human security seriously.
This two-volume reference work, by one of the world's leading analysts of regional affairs, places these events in historical context and considers what they may mean for future political, economic and strategic relations. By focusing on the United States, China and the region's most significant middle powers, the book explains why and how the Asia-Pacific has become the fulcrum of international events.
Features
Includes 14 thematic chapters covering all of the major areas of Australian foreign policy providing readers with a comprehensive view of Australian foreign policymaking today.
Encompasses major events in Australian politics and foreign policy 2011-15 providing readers with a quick reference tool for locating major events.
Chronology of Australia’s Foreign Policy and Political Events 2011–2015
List of Australian Prime Ministers and Foreign Affairs, Trade and Defence Ministers, 2011–15.
'Beeson and Stubbs’ important volume brings together a group of leading specialists on Asia-Pacific regionalism. It is distinguished not just by the breadth of its coverage of regional institutions—both economic and security—but of the context in which they have evolved and the main challenges they face.' Professor John Ravenhill, Australian National University.
Description:
The Routledge Handbook of Asian Regionalism is a definitive introduction to, and analysis of, the development of regionalism in Asia, including coverage of East Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia. The contributors engage in a comprehensive exploration of what is arguably the most dynamic and important region in the world. Significantly, this volume addresses the multiple manifestations of regionalism in Asia and is consequently organised thematically under the headings of:
conceptualizing the region
economic issues
political issues
strategic issues
regional organizations
As such, the Handbook presents some of the key elements of the competing interpretations of this important and highly contested topic, giving the reader a chance to evaluate not just where Asian regionalism is going but also how the scholarship on Asian regionalism is analysing these trends and events.
This book will be an indispensable resource for students and scholars of Asian politics, international relations and regionalism.
Intuitively, we might expect regional institutions to play a major role in achieving this. Yet one of the most widely noted characteristics of the Asia-Pacific region has been its relatively modest levels of institutional development thus far. However, things are changing: as individual economies in the Asia-Pacific become more deeply integrated, there is a growing interest in developing and adding to the institutions that already exist.
Institutions of the Asia-Pacific examines how this region is developing, and what role established organisations like APEC and new bodies like ASEAN Plus Three are playing in this process. An expert in the field, Mark Beeson introduces the contested nature of the very region itself – should it be the ‘Asia-Pacific’ or ‘East Asia’ to which we pay most attention and expect to see most institutional development. By placing these developments in historical context, he reveals why the very definition of the region remains unsettled and why the political, economic and strategic relations of this remarkably diverse region remain fraught and difficult to manage.
"Combining intellectual rigor and contemporary focus, a wide-ranging portrait of the global system bringing together leading scholars to reflect on the great changes underway in world politics." —Professor G. John Ikenberry, Princeton University
"This excellent and well integrated collection of high-quality chapters introduces and addresses the key questions that face the international system in the first half of the twenty-first century. Readable and engaging, it is a must buy for students of world politics." —Professor Michael Cox, London School of Economics
"[W]ell written, insightful, and tightly argued essays on important issues... address their subjects with keen analytic eyes that provide the reader with information, vision, and insights... [A]n important and useful book." - A.J. Waskey, Choice
Product
Description:
From climate change and financial crisis to new security challenges and the rise of new powers, this major text brings together specially-commissioned and carefully edited contributions by a range of leading scholars to provide a very accessible and genuinely global introduction to the key issues in international relations today."
The goal of books such as these is to highlight issues, offer food for thought and stir up discussion; the authors should therefore be commended for doing just that,... - Dzirhan Mahadzir, Contemporary Southeast Asia
Description
This book uniquely applies the security reform agenda to Southeast Asia. It investigates recent developments in civil-military relations in the region, looking in particular at the impact and utility of the agenda on the region and assessing whether it is likely to help make the region more stable and less prone to military interventions.
It provides an historical overview of the region’s civil-military relations and goes on to explore the dynamics of civil-military relations within the context of the security sector reform framework, focusing on the experiences of four of the region’s militaries: Malaysia, Thailand, the Philippines and Indonesia. It argues that although regional militaries have not necessarily followed a ‘Western’ model, significant developments have occurred that are broadly in keeping with the security sector reform agenda, and which suggests that the prospects for stable civil-military relations are brighter than some sceptics believe."
Nowhere is this re-evaluation more important than in East Asia, a region that has been defined by American power since the Second World War. Indeed, despite America’s physical distance from East Asia, the United States has been a key player in the region since the nineteenth century, when it played a major role in opening up both Japan and China to the West.
This book details the changing nature of power relations in East Asia, and includes case studies on China, Japan, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, Korea and Australia. It argues that there are a number of insights that can be drawn from various traditions which help to explain the complex, multi-dimensional nature of American power at the beginning of the twenty-first century.
Across the region, countries are being forced to come to terms with and accommodate America’s dominant position and its increasingly assertive foreign policy. History and contingent contemporary circumstances mean that the precise nature of bilateral relationships will be different. But whether the Bush Doctrine is having a salutary or destructive effect on the region or specific countries, it is something East Asia and the rest of the world will have to learn to live with.
in a change of government, the whole infrastructure of state capture remains intact.’
a country that has made greater sacrifices of blood and treasure than Australia has on behalf of its American ally and notional security guarantor.