Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Hijra

The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, 2012
...Read more
Hijra PETRA M. SIJPESTEIJN This term is usually associated with Muhammad’s flight from MECCA to MEDINA, which Muslim tradition places in September 622 CE. The exodus theme has strong parallels with Abraham’s emigration from Mesopotamia and Moses’ flight from Egypt. However, the root h-j-r as used in the Qur’an and elsewhere in early Arabic texts means the breaking off of ties of kinship and relations, and it is this severing of the Muslim community’s ties with the Arab tribes of Medina that should really be emphasized in the hijra. Muhammad’s first revelations in 610 do not seem to have stirred any animosity, but with the increase of the Revelation’s specificity and the growth of Muhammad’s support base, the Meccan establishment, especially the clan of Qur’aysh, saw their position threatened. Muha- mmad’s activities were no longer tolerated, and Muslims came under increasing pressure in the form of verbal and physical abuse and social and commercial boycotts. This situation motivated a group of Muslims to undertake the first hijra by moving to Ethiopia in the year 615. As long as Muhammad could rely on the support of his clan, the Ha ¯shim, he was relatively safe, but with the death of his uncle Abu ¯T ˙ a ¯lib in 619 Muham- mad’s position in Mecca became precarious. The invitation in 622 from the inhabitants of the settlement of Medina to move there was thus very welcome, and in the fall of that year the prophet and his seventy or so supporters secretly left Mecca. The muhajiru ¯n, those who emigrated with Muhammad, are mentioned in the so-called CONSTITUTION OF MEDINA (Ibn Hisha ¯m, 341–4) with a position comparable to that of the Arab clans of Medina. The move from Mecca to Medina was more than a geographical displacement; it signified a break with the traditional Arabian tribal structure. In Medina, Muhammad could preach freely and the UMMA could develop as a community extending beyond tribal delineations. Hence the hijra, or rather the beginning of the lunar year in which this took place (July 16, 622), signals the beginning of Islam and the Muslim calendar. The earliest use of this calendar can be found on two Arabic papyri from Egypt, dated in the year 22 (643). An Arabic inscrip- tion dated to the year 24 from Arabia and an epitaph dated in year 31 from Egypt are further evidence of this calendar having been in use among the Muslims at this early period. With the development of the notion of sa ¯biqa, precedence, especially in the sense of submission to Islam, and the (financial) priv- ileges that were associated with it, the status of muha ¯jir became highly valued. In the litera- ture, the lists of those who claimed to have joined in the hijra consequently get ever larger over time. The cutting-off of relations also forms the background to another early meaning of hijra, namely the emigration from the Arabian Peninsula to participate in the conquests of the seventh century or to settle in the garrison cities. The term muhajiru ¯n used in Greek papyri from the seventh and eighth century (moagaritai) and in Syriac texts (mahgraye or mhaggraye) for the Arab conquerors confirms this. In Islamic law, a third meaning of hijra can be encountered, referring to the moving from the da ¯r al-harb to the da ¯r al-isla ¯m, which is strongly encouraged. SEE ALSO: Muhammad. REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED READINGS al-Ghabban (2003) “A.I.‘Naqsh Zuhayr: Aqdam naqsh Isla ¯mı ¯.” Arabia 1: 293–342. Crone, P. (1994) “The first-century concept of ‘Hijra’.” Arabica 41(3): 352–87. Hurgronje, S. (1923). “Twee populaire Dwalingen verbeterd.” In Verspreide Geschriften, vol. 1: 297–305. Bonn. Kennedy, H. (1986) The prophet and the age of the caliphates. London. Peters, R. “Hi djra in fiqh.” Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., vol. 12: 368. The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, First Edition. Edited by Roger S. Bagnall, Kai Brodersen, Craige B. Champion, Andrew Erskine, and Sabine R. Huebner, print pages 3215–3216. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published 2013 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah12099 1
1 Hijra PETRA M. SIJPESTEIJN This term is usually associated with Muhammad’s flight from MECCA to MEDINA, which Muslim tradition places in September 622 CE. The exodus theme has strong parallels with Abraham’s emigration from Mesopotamia and Moses’ flight from Egypt. However, the root h-j-r as used in the Qur’an and elsewhere in early Arabic texts means the breaking off of ties of kinship and relations, and it is this severing of the Muslim community’s ties with the Arab tribes of Medina that should really be emphasized in the hijra. Muhammad’s first revelations in 610 do not seem to have stirred any animosity, but with the increase of the Revelation’s specificity and the growth of Muhammad’s support base, the Meccan establishment, especially the clan of Qur’aysh, saw their position threatened. Muhammad’s activities were no longer tolerated, and Muslims came under increasing pressure in the form of verbal and physical abuse and social and commercial boycotts. This situation motivated a group of Muslims to undertake the first hijra by moving to Ethiopia in the year 615. As long as Muhammad could rely on the support of his clan, the Hāshim, he was relatively safe, but with the death of his uncle Abū Tālib in 619 Muham˙ mad’s position in Mecca became precarious. The invitation in 622 from the inhabitants of the settlement of Medina to move there was thus very welcome, and in the fall of that year the prophet and his seventy or so supporters secretly left Mecca. The muhajirūn, those who emigrated with Muhammad, are mentioned in the so-called CONSTITUTION OF MEDINA (Ibn Hishām, 341–4) with a position comparable to that of the Arab clans of Medina. The move from Mecca to Medina was more than a geographical displacement; it signified a break with the traditional Arabian tribal structure. In Medina, Muhammad could preach freely and the UMMA could develop as a community extending beyond tribal delineations. Hence the hijra, or rather the beginning of the lunar year in which this took place (July 16, 622), signals the beginning of Islam and the Muslim calendar. The earliest use of this calendar can be found on two Arabic papyri from Egypt, dated in the year 22 (643). An Arabic inscription dated to the year 24 from Arabia and an epitaph dated in year 31 from Egypt are further evidence of this calendar having been in use among the Muslims at this early period. With the development of the notion of sābiqa, precedence, especially in the sense of submission to Islam, and the (financial) privileges that were associated with it, the status of muhājir became highly valued. In the literature, the lists of those who claimed to have joined in the hijra consequently get ever larger over time. The cutting-off of relations also forms the background to another early meaning of hijra, namely the emigration from the Arabian Peninsula to participate in the conquests of the seventh century or to settle in the garrison cities. The term muhajirūn used in Greek papyri from the seventh and eighth century (moagaritai) and in Syriac texts (mahgraye or mhaggraye) for the Arab conquerors confirms this. In Islamic law, a third meaning of hijra can be encountered, referring to the moving from the dār al-harb to the dār al-islām, which is strongly encouraged. SEE ALSO: Muhammad. REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED READINGS al-Ghabban (2003) “A.I.‘Naqsh Zuhayr: Aqdam naqsh Islāmı̄.” Arabia 1: 293–342. Crone, P. (1994) “The first-century concept of ‘Hijra’.” Arabica 41(3): 352–87. Hurgronje, S. (1923). “Twee populaire Dwalingen verbeterd.” In Verspreide Geschriften, vol. 1: 297–305. Bonn. Kennedy, H. (1986) The prophet and the age of the caliphates. London. Peters, R. “Hidjra in fiqh.” Encyclopedia of Islam, 2nd ed., vol. 12: 368. The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, First Edition. Edited by Roger S. Bagnall, Kai Brodersen, Craige B. Champion, Andrew Erskine, and Sabine R. Huebner, print pages 3215–3216. © 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published 2013 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah12099