DOI: 10.2478/JAS-2019-0003 J. APIC. SCI. VOL. 63 NO. 1 2019
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
Original Article
ANTIOXIDATIVE PROPERTIES OF SELECTED POLISH HONEYS
Paweł Piszcz
Bronisław K. Głód*
Department of Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Faculty
of Science, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 3 Maja 54,
08-110 Siedlce, Poland
*corresponding author: bkg@onet.eu
Received: 1 July 2018; accepted: 14 November 2018
ABSTRACT
The antioxidative activities of honeys collected in Poland were screened. The total antioxidant potential (TAP) provides more information about the system than the determination of individual antioxidant. TAP is proportional to the sum of products of concentrations of all antioxidants in the sample and their antioxidant powers (rate constants).
To measure, compare and correlate TAPs, we used techniques which we had recently
elaborated (i) related to hydroxyl radicals, (ii) RP-HPLC measurements with amperometric detection and (iii) differential pulsed voltammetry (DPV). They were correlated with
techniques already described in the literature (i) related to the DPPH radicals, (ii) the total
content of phenolic compounds and (iii) color intensity. All assays revealed the following
order of obtained TAP values: buckwheat > honeydew > linden > multi-flower> acacia
honey. Correlations were found between results obtained using different techniques.
There was also a significant correlation with the results obtained by authors using other
measurement techniques. Differences in antioxidant properties among individual honeys
are inversely proportional to the strength of the radicals in relation to which measurements were performed. This is due to the fact that strong radicals react not only with
strong antioxidants but also with weak ones, which are much more common. The darker
honeys were also observed to be characterized by higher TAP values.
Keywords: fenton reaction, free radicals, high performance liquid chromatography, honey,
mead, total antioxidant potential
INTRODUCTION
Atoms, molecules or ions with an unpaired
number of electrons are called free radicals
(Sharan, Odyuo, & Purkayastha, 2011). They are
responsible for many diseases, aging processes
and apoptosis (Raz & Daugherty, 2018). Most
of them are strong oxidants. The free radical
scavengers deactivate free radicals, while antioxidants remove oxidants. Both terms are
frequently used interchangeably (Elad, 1992),
but generally the term antioxidant refers
to any substance which at a low concentration prevents oxidation. Diseases and aging
sometimes decrease the productions of antioxidants, so their depletion should be compensated by an increased antioxidant-rich food
supply (Hoyos-Arbeláez, Vázquez, & ContrerasCalderón, 2017). Exogenous antioxidant intake
is crucial to maintaining a red-ox buffer and
repairing and/or preventing cell damage. Free
radicals have been also implicated in the deterioration of food (Smirnov, 2017). Synthetic antioxidants are widely used in the food industry
and medicine. Because they are often carcinogenic and contribute to free radical production,
natural antioxidants are intensively studied.
Honeys and the meads obtained from them
serve as a source of natural antioxidants and
are considered as functional food with physiological beneficial constituents (Junie et al.,
2016). Therefore, the knowledge of the antioxidant properties of honeys and other bee-products is important in the food industry as well as
for health and nutrition (Bogdanov et al., 2008).
They are natural food (not processed and not
contain any additives) and contain such natural
antioxidants as phenolic acids, flavanoids
and vitamins which prevent many diseases.
Their amounts and types depend largely
81
Piszcz et AL.
Antioxidative properties of honeys
upon the floral source of honey (Wróblewska,
Warakomska, & Koter, 2006). Darker honeys
have usually been shown to have a higher antioxidant content than lighter ones (Bertoncelj
et al., 2007). Polyphenols because of their antiradical and antioxidative activities are believed
to be important in human health for cancer
and heart diseases prevention, immune system
decline, gastrointestinal disorders and antiinflammatory activity (Arroyo-Curras, RosasGarcia, & Videa, 2016). Furthermore, they have
been proven to be effective against deteriorative oxidative reactions in food, caused by light,
heat and some metals (Waś et al., 2017).
In the literature, many methods of the total antioxidant potential (TAP) assays are described.
Other names and acronyms often include total
antioxidant capacity (TAC), activity (TAA),
reactivity (TAR), status (TAS) and redox antioxidant parameter (TRAP) (Głód, Czapski, & Haddad,
2000; Masek, Chrzescijanska, & Zaborski, 2014).
There is no one universal assay capable of
providing an accurate TAP value because of
several mechanisms underlying TAP measurements, including electrochemical reactions, termination of free radical mediated chain reaction
and chelation of catalytic transition metals ions.
In addition, such side reactions as metal complexations or redox reactions are observed
among radicals, antioxidants and metals.
Therefore, a single method is not sufficient to
describe the sample antioxidative properties
and different analytical methods are utilized
instead. However, natural methods for studying
the redox reactions seem to be electroanalytical ones (Głód, Kiersztyn, & Piszcz, 2014).
Indeed, TAP has been already estimated through
potentiometry or voltammetry as analytical
techniques (Hoyos-Arbeláez, Vázquez, & Contreras-Calderón, 2017; Doménech-Carbó et al.,
2017; Głód, Haddad, & Alexander, 1992; OrtizMiranda et al., 2016; Doménech-Carbó et al.,
2015; Sužnjević, Pastor, & Gorjanović, 2015).
The righteous TAP measure is a standard redox
potential, which is directly correlated with the
half-wave potential in polarography and the
voltammetric peak potential. However, this
measure can be used only for pure compounds
82
than for complex real samples, like food products
(honeys). The purpose of the present study
was to evaluate the total antioxidant potential
(TAP) values of honeys from Poland of different
botanical origin, obtained using various assays
including those elaborated by us.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Instrumentation
HPLC was measured through means of a chromatograph (comprising of an Interface Box, 4
channel Smartline Manager 5000 with Degasser
K-5004, Solvent Organizer K-1500, Dynamic
Mixing Chamber, HPLC Pump Smartline 1000,
UV/Vis Diode Array Detector Smartline 2600,
20 μl D-14163 injection Valle and Smartline
4000 Column Thermostat; all from Knauer
GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and an amperometric detector (Recipe, Berlin, Germany, ClinLab
EC3000; working electrode - glassy carbon
electrode, GC; reference electrode - Ag/AgCl;
auxiliary electrode – cell body) and an autosampler (Smartline-3900). Samples were separated
on a Eurospher RP-18, 5 μm, 250 x 4 mm I.D.
(Knauer, Berlin, Germany) column. System was
controlled and data acquired on an IBM PC type
computer with Eurochrom 2000 and ClarityChrom V 2.6 2007 software. pH was measured
using Ph-metr OP-208/1 (Radelkis, Budapest,
Hungary) with OSH 10-10 electrode (Metron,
Swiss). Photometric (total phenolic compounds
content) measurements were performed with
the use of a Helios Epsilon spectrophotometer
(Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and spectrophotometer DU68 (Beckman, USA).
Electrochemical measurements were performed
using the Autolab PGSTAT20 potentiostat/galvanostat (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, Netherlands). A
three-electrode system was used throughout
the study. As a working electrode, a 2 mm
diameter glassy carbon disk, polished before
each measurement, was used. A platinum wire
served as an auxiliary electrode and saturated
Ag/AgCl (3 mol/L KCl) electrode as a reference
electrode. Prior to use, the GC working electrode
was polished with an aqueous suspension of 0.05
mm alumina on a polishing pad and then rinsed
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
with water. All solutions were deaerated with a
stream of argon. The system was controlled and
data was acquired on an IBM PC type computer
with GPES v 4.9 software.
Reagents
Gallic, 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic and p-hydroxybenzoic acids, iron(II) sulfate(VI), phosphate buffered
saline (PBS) tablets and HPLC grade methanol
were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA);
bromine, sodium tungstate, sodium molybdate,
sodium carbonate, phosphoric acid, lithium
sulfate, hydrochloric acid, sodium hydrogen
phosphate and sodium dihydrogen phosphate
from POCh (Gliwice, Poland); sodium hydroxide
and hydrogen peroxide from CHEMPUR (Piekary
Śląskie, Poland); and DPPH - 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, CSA - camphosulfonic acid (Sigma
- Aldrich). Water was distilled three times from
quartz. Mobile phases were filtered through a
0.22 μm membrane filter (Millipore, Bedford,
USA). Commercial honey types acacia, multi-flower, linden and honeydew were purchased from
Bartnik Sądecki apiary and buckwheat from
pasieka Władysław Jezior apiary.
Procedures
We estimated the TAPs, related to hydroxyl
radicals (TAPOH), of the honey samples, as
described in our previous study (Głód et al.,
2011), using a HPLC/UV system. The hydroxyl
radicals were generated in the Fenton reaction
(0.3% hydrogen peroxide, a solution of 1 mM
iron (II) and phosphate buffer at pH 7.4). A chromatographic analysis of 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic
was performed with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/ min.
The column was stabilized at 20ºC for the mobile
phase for 1 h prior to the chromatographic measurements. A phosphate buffer (pH 6.6) was used
as a mobile phase. 10 mmol/L stock solutions
of the analyzed compounds were prepared in
triplicate distilled from quartz water and diluted
to the required concentration before use. 20 μl
samples were injected with an autosampler.
Chromatographic experiments with electrochemical detection were performed at
1.0 ml/ min flow rate. The column was stabilized
at 20ºC during the passage of the mobile phase
for 1 h prior to the chromatographic measurements. A phosphate buffer (100 mmol/L, pH 6.6)
+ methanol (96 + 4)% v/v was used as a mobile
phase. Stock solutions of the honeys were
prepared in triplicate distilled from quartz water
and diluted to the required concentration before
use. 20 μl samples were injected with an autosampler. An output signal from the electrochemical detector was continuously displayed on the
computer. The measurement of the TAP value
was the total surface area of all peaks recorded
on the chromatogram at the given potential of
working electrode.
Electrochemical measurements, differential
pulse voltammetry (DPV) and cyclic voltammetry
(CV), were performed using the three-electrode
system consisting of a 2 mm glassy carbon disk,
platinum wire auxiliary electrode and saturated
Ag/AgCl (3 mol/L KCl) electrode as the reference
electrode. Electrochemical measurements (10 ml)
were done in 100 mM NaClO4 as a basic electrolyte, 1 mM camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) to protect
working electrode against irreversible adsorption
of the analyzed samples and 100 mM phosphate
buffer pH 7.4. All cyclic voltammograms were
measured at positive potentials usually ranging
between 0.0 ÷ 1.5 V at a scan rate of 200 mV/s.
DPV measurements were performed using
the following parameters: pretreatment conditioning potential – 0.5 V; equilibration time
– 5 s; measurement modulation time – 0.002
s; interval time – 0.3 s; initial potential – 0.5 V;
end potential – 1.5 V; potential step – 4.95 mV;
modulation amplitude – 0,03 V. Each sample was
analyzed three times (Głód, Kiersztyn, & Piszcz,
2014; Masek, Chrzescijanska, & Zaborski, 2014).
The DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the
extracts was measured according to the photometric method (Brand-Williams, Cuvelier, & Berset,
1995). The measurements were performed by
adding to a 1 ml glass cuvette 0.4 ml of honey
extract at a concentration 400 mg/ml, 0.4 ml
DPPH methanolic solution (0.2 mmol/L) and 0.2
ml water. The reaction mixture was vortexed
and absorbance was measured at 517 nm using
a spectrophotometer with methanol as the
blank. Decrease in absorbance was monitored
at 0 min, 1 min, 2 min, and every 15 min until
83
Piszcz et AL.
Antioxidative properties of honeys
the reaction has reached a plateau. The TAPDPPH
was expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAEs =
1000 x mass of GA / mass of honey).
The total concentration of the polyphenols
was estimated through the use of modified
Folin – Ciocalteau (FC) assay (Cheung, Cheung, &
Ooi, 2003). In the reaction of polyphenols with
a FC reagent, the blue tungsten (W8O23) and
molybdenum (Mo8O23) oxides formed. Measurements were performed by adding to a 10 ml
flask 1 ml of honey extract at a concentration
400 mg/ ml and 1 ml of FC reagent. After three
minutes, 4 ml of 20% Na2CO3 was added and
supplemented with water to the mixture. In this
basic state the dissociation of phenolic proton
leading to a phenolic ion was capable of reducing
FCR. The reaction mixture was incubated at 25°C
for 30 min. The absorbance was determined at
765 nm with a spectrophotometer. Water was
used as blank. The phenolic compound concentrations were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAEs). The gallic acid solutions with con-
centrations ranging from 0.1 to 8 μg/l were used
for calibration. A dose response linear regression
was generated by using the gallic acid standard
absorbance and the levels in the samples were
expressed as gallic acid equivalents (mg of GA/g
of honey solution).
The color of honey has been suggested to
reflect largly its antioxidant activity (Bertoncelj
et al., 2007). Therefore, the color intensity was
measured for each of the honeys, which were
diluted with distilled water to 50% solution. The
solution was then ultrasonicated for five minutes
and filtered through a filter (0.45 μm membrane
Millipore filter). The absorbance was measured
at 450 and 720 nm. The results are presented
as the difference in absorbance at these two
wavelengths. The honeys were prepared by
being dissolved in water in the ratio 1:10 (electrochemical measurements) or 1:20 (chromatographic and photometric measurements) and
filtered through 0.45 μm membrane Millipore
filter.
Fig. 1. TAPDPPH values of five different honeys. The
results show the average ±SD of three independent
experiments.
Fig. 3. TAPsDPV of tested honeys. Results show the
average ±SD of three independent experiments.
Fig. 2. TAPs of tested honeys. The results show
the average ±SD of three independent experiments.
OH
84
Fig. 4. TAPED values of honeys obtained at different
potentials using HPLC-ED assay (by the growth:
○ acacia, ♦ multi-flower, ● linden, ■ honeydew,
▲ buckwheat honeys).
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
Fig. 5. HPLC chromatograms of the 1 mg/ml buckwheat honey. Electrochemical detector with the glassy
carbon working at electrode potential, E = 0.2; 0.4; 0.6; 0.8; 1.0 V vs Ag/AgCl for figures A ÷ E, respectively.
mechanisms. The TAP values related to the DPPH
and hydroxyl radicals are presented in Figs. 1
and 2, respectively. TAPs measured using differential pulsed voltammetry are presented in Fig.
3. TAPs obtained with the use of HPLC measurements amperometrically detected at different
working electrode potentials is presented in Fig.
RESULTS
4 and their corresponding chromatograms in
Fig. 5. For comparison, the total concentration
Different assays were used for the TAPs de- of polyphenolic compounds and color intensity
termination of five different honeys, which of honeys are presented in Figs. 6 and 7.
allowed a deeper understanding of the oxidation
Data Analysis
The measurements of the antioxidant capacity
were done three times for each sample and the
average was used for further calculations. From
such obtained results the background (without
sample) TAP values were subtracted.
85
Piszcz et AL.
Antioxidative properties of honeys
Fig. 6. Total polyphenol content of five investigated
honeys.
Fig. 7. The absorbance of honeys.
DISCUSSION
Several TAP measurement techniques, including
those elaborated by us, are compared in the
paper. The main components of honey are polyphenols, which are probably responsible for its
antioxidant properties. The composition and
antioxidant activity depend on the source of
downloaded nectar, seasonal and environmental factors and the processing and treatment
(Bertoncelj et al., 2007). Generally, more darkly
colored honeys have a higher antioxidant
potential (Wilczyńska, 2010).
Such polyphenols as flavonoids and phenolic
acids derived from benzoic, mandelic and
cinnamic acids are antioxidants commonly found
in food products, including honey. Hence, their
concentrations reflect the TAP of strong antioxidants of the sample. The Folin-Ciocalteu method
(Brand-Williams, Cuvelier, & Berset, 1995) was
used to estimate the total phenolic content of
the honeys as is presented in Fig. 6. The FolinCiocalteu reagent is not selective only to polyphenols but also reacts with such other reducing
86
agents as ascorbic acid (Singleton, Orthofer, &
Lamuela-Raventós, 1999). Therefore, the assay
tends to overestimate the level of polyphenols.
The total polyphenol content varied from 0.19 to
1.24 GAE for the tested acacia and buckwheat
honeys, respectively.
A popular method for TAP determination is
based on the DPPH free radical scavenging
activity assay and relies on the reduction of
methanolic DPPH solution in the presence of antioxidants (Piszcz et al., 2014). DPPH reduction
by a hydrogen donating compound leads to
a change in color. The obtained results are
presented in Fig. 1. Total polyphenols content
correlated with the TAPDPPH of the honeys (R2
= 0.946) (Fig. 8.). This is in accordance with
findings by authors who reported that total
phenolic content correlated with the free radical
scavenging activity of honeys (Pontis et al., 2014,
Wilczyńska, 2010). Larger values expressed
in GAE were obtained for the FC method. The
relationship shown in the graph does not go
through the zero. This means that some weak
antioxidants did not react with the DPPH radical
but were oxidized by the FC reagent.
The color intensities of the investigated honeys
are shown in Fig. 7. The greatest ABS450 [AU]
value is shown to be in the buckwheat honey
solution and the lowest in the acacia one. The
compounds carotenoids, xanthophylls, chlorophylls and flavonoids with aromatic or double
bond moieties are responsible for the color
of honeys (Piszcz et al., 2014; Wróblewska &
Stawiarz, 2004). In addition, the color depends
on colloids formed from protein molecules,
beeswax, bio-elements and water and may
become darker as a result of the Maillard
reaction (Antony et al., 2000). On the other
hand, a feature of strong antioxidants is their
many resonant (mesomeric) structures (Piszcz
et al., 2014). Thus, the correlation between
color and antioxidant strength is anticipated, as
shown in Fig. 9.
Hydroxyl radicals are the most reactive that
appear in living organisms and also among the
strongest known oxidants. Their reduction
potential equals 2.31 V versus standard
hydrogen electrode. Therefore they are highly
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
Fig. 8. The correlation between TAP(DPPH) and
total polyphenol content.
Fig. 9. The correlation between ABS450 and TAPDPPH.
reactive, so TAPOH provides more reliable information than TAPDPPH. An assay for the determination TAPOH (Piszcz, Żurawski, & Głód,
2014) was developed based on the reaction
of hydroxyl radicals, generated in the Fenton
reaction, with the test sample and a spin-trap
sensor, salicylic, p-hydroxybenzoic or terephthalic acid. The product of the radical reaction
with the sensor is determined through HPLC
photometric, fluorescence or electrochemical
detection. The buckwheat was characterized
by the strongest antioxidant properties (Fig. 2).
Total polyphenols content (TPC) correlated to
TAPOH (R2 = 0.892). This suggests that TAPs are
mainly due to polyphenolic compounds (Fig. 10),
although the weak correlation indicates that
other antioxidants are also present in the sample.
Hydroxyl radicals react not only with polyphenols but also with such compounds as alcohols
or sugars. Therefore, relationship shown in the
graph in Fig. 10 does not pass through the origin
of coordinate system. Even without polyphenol
in the sample, hydroxyl radicals react with
such weak antioxidants as sugars, but also side
reactions cannot be omitted.
Fig. 10. Correlation between TAPOH and total
polyphenol content of tested honeys by the
growth of polyphenols: acacia, multi-flower, linden,
honeydew, buckwheat .
The sample’s ability to reduce Fe3+ ions (a prooxidant metal ion) suggests that they act as
free radical chain terminators and transform
reactive free radical species into more stable
non-radical products, for example in ascorbic
acid. On the other hand, Fe2+ is also pro-oxidant
because it participates in the Fenton reaction.
Some antioxidants e.g. flavonoids may also
complex iron ions (Głód, Kaczmarski, & Baumann,
2006). Additionally, the presence of hydrogen
peroxide may lead to the generation of hydroxyl
radicals (Garedew, Schmolz, & Lamprech, 2003).
All together, the TAPOH values depend on many
parameters and substances present in the
sample what may be inconvenient in some measurements. However, similar reactions are found
in the human body. Therefore, the TAP values
related to the hydroxyl radical better describe
the truly occurring reactions between radicals
and antioxidants, which run in living organisms.
Differences among TAPOH values of that five
honeys are smaller than those among TAPFCR,
ABS450 or TAPDPPH because strong hydroxyl
radicals react not only with strong antioxidants
but also with such weak ones as sugars whose
concentrations in all honeys are similar.
Electroanalytical techniques, particularly voltammetric, are used to study oxidants and antioxidants (Głód, Kiersztyn, & Piszcz, 2014). To
eliminate the capacitive currents and decrease
the limit of detection, the measurements were
performed using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), but these methods are suitable for
pure compounds. The TAP measure of real (for
87
Piszcz et AL.
Antioxidative properties of honeys
example honeys) samples can be the surface
area (charge) under the voltammetric curve. A
significant drawback of this method was the
independence of the results on the potentials
at which the reactions were carried out. Głód,
Kiersztyn, & Piszcz (2014) proposed the new
TAPDPV measure, the surface area under the
voltammetric curve in which the abscissa is the
exponent of the potential measured in relation
to the reduction potential of the hydroxyl radical.
TAPDPV is directly proportional to the antioxidant
concentration and inversely proportional to its
redox potential. As in the previous measurements, the buckwheat honey was characterized
by the strongest antioxidant properties while
the acacia honey by the weakest (Fig. 3).
As mentioned, the electrochemical method
allows the direct measurement of antioxidative activities (TAPs) and has been suggested
to use the total surface area of all antioxidants
recorded on the HPLC chromatogram obtained
with amperometric detector, (Wantusiak, Piszcz,
& Głód, 2012). It is considered to be a major
advantage of electrochemical detection in HPLC
in comparison to the voltammetric methods.
Due to the presence of large convection
current and lack of capacitive current in the
HPLC-ED measurements the TAP detection limit
measured using HPLC-ED assay is several orders
of magnitude lower than the TAP detection limit
measured using DPV assay.
Another advantage of these assays is that
TAP can be related to various potentials of
the working electrode, i.e. to the different antioxidant power and to different retentions,
i.e. it can be separated on individual antioxidants or groups of antioxidants. In addition, as
a measure of TAPED the sum of TAPs obtained
at various potentials can be used (Piszcz et
al., 2014). Reversed phase HPLC chromatograms of buckwheat honey, obtained at various
potentials, are presented in Fig. 5. The increase
of potential increases (sigmoidal relationship)
chromatographic peaks and creates the new
ones. This provides additional information on
the antioxidant properties of the sample.
The higher the chromatographic peak, the
greater is the concentration of the antioxi-
88
dant. The stronger antioxidant, the lower is it
oxidation potential. Chromatographic peaks at
retention times of 4.9, 6.9, 16.4 minutes come
from strong antioxidants whose concentrations
are lower, confirmed by small chromatographic
peaks heights, than the concentration of antioxidants that appear at higher potentials. On the
other hand, peaks that appear at the potentials
of 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 V with retention times of 6.1,
9.5 and 14.5 minutes have weaker antioxidative
effects, but there may be greater concentrations.
HPLC chromatograms of the 1 mg/ml buckwheat
honey obtained at different potentials are
presented in Fig. 5. TAPED values depend on
the used potential. Shapes of the curves (Fig.
4) are similar to the hydrodynamically obtained
voltamograms. Buckwheat honey turned out
to be characterized by the most powerful antioxidant properties at all investigated potentials.
Very high TAPED values at higher potentials
suggest that buckwheat honey contains many
weak antioxidants. In general, all curves were
similar. Therefore, the values of honey TAPED
obtained with different potentials did not
provide additional information on their antioxidant properties. TAPED turned out to be proportional to TAPOH (Fig. 11). Correlation did not pass
through zero because TAPED was measured at
1.0 V while the reduction potential of hydroxyl
radicals equalled 2.31 V. In other words,
hydroxyl radical reacted with such compounds
as alcohols and sugars which were not oxidized
electrochemically.
Potential 1.0 V was selected as the optimal value.
At higher potentials, there was no additional
electrochemical signals from the weaker antioxidants, and only an increase in the total surface
area was observed. In addition, at the potential
higher than 1.2 V, a carbon electrode and water
are oxidized, which makes the measurements
impossible.
We devised new TAP measuring methods to be
applied to the investigation of honey antioxidative activity. TAPED, TAPDPPH and TAPFCR were
used to correlate the obtained results (Fig. 12).
A linear correlation was found between TAPED
tested using different potentials.
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
flavonoids concentrations and color (Wieczorek
et al., 2014).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was performed within the framework
of research project no. 228/06/S of Siedlce
University. We would like to thank M. Cendrowska
and P. Wantusiak for their assistance in
performing the experiments.
Fig. 11. Correlation between TAPOH and TAPED (1.0 V).
Points correspond to honeys (acacia, multi-flower,
linden, honeydew, buckwheat) according to their
growing TAP values.
Fig. 12. Correlation between TAPED (1.0 V) (♦),
TAPDPPH (■) and TAPFCR. Points correspond to honeys
(acacia, multi-flower, linden, honeydew, buckwheat)
according to their growing TAP values.
The smallest differences among the honeys
was found for TAPOH, due to the very high
reactivity of hydroxyl radicals. There was a correlation between TAP and the color of honey,
in which crystalline and dark honey had higher
TAP values than liquid and light honeys. The
TAP values largely depended on the content
of polyphenolic compounds. The buckwheat
honey had the strongest antioxidant activity
while the acacia honey the lowest one. The
same effect was observed for the honeys from
other countries and tested using other methods
(Maurya et al., 2014; Gül, & Pehlivan, 2018). The
examined honeys were typical for Poland, and
their antioxidative properties examined through
TAPDPPH, TAPOH, TAPDPV, TAPED, TAPFCR and ABS450
grew in the order of acacia, multi-flower, linden,
honeydew and buckwheat. The same order
was obtained for phenolic compounds and
REFERENCES
Antony, S.M., Han, I.Y., Rieck, J.R., & Dawson, P.L. (2000)
Antioxidative effect of maillard reaction products
formed from honey at different reaction times. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(9), 39853989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf000305x
Arroyo-Curras, N., Rosas-Garcia, V.M., & Videa, M.
(2016). Substituent Inductive Effects on the Electrochemical Oxidation of Flavonoids Studied by Square
Wave Voltammetry and Ab Initio Calculations. Molecules, 21(11), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21111422
Bertoncelj, J., Doberšek, U., Jamnik, M., & Golob, T.
(2007). Evaluation of the phenolic content, antioxidant activity and colour of Slovenian honey.
Food Chemistry, 105(2), 822-828. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.01.060
Bogdanov, S., Jurendic, T., Sieber, R., & Gallmann, P.
(2008). Honey for Nutrition and Health: A Review.
Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 27(6),
677-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2008.
10719745
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M.E., & Berset, C. (1995).
Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant
activity. (Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft & Technologie),
LWT - Food Science and Technology, 28(1), 25-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)800085
Cheung, L.M., Cheung, P.C., & Ooi, V.E.C. (2003). Antioxidant activity and total phenolics of edible mushroom extracts. Food Chemistry, 81(2), 249-255.
89
Piszcz et AL.
Antioxidative properties of honeys
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00419-3
oxidant potential assay with cyclic voltammetry and/
or differential pulse voltammetry measurements.
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 719, 24-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.02.004
Doménech-Carbó, A., Gavara, R., Hernández-Muñoz,
P., & Domínguez, I. (2015). Contact probe voltammetry for in situ monitoring of the reactivity of phenolic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) compounds Głód, B.K., Piszcz, P., Czajka, K., & Zarzycki, P.K. (2011).
with ROS. Talanta, 144, 1207-1215. https://doi. A new total antioxidant potential measurements
org/10.1016/j.talanta.2015.07.092
using RP-HPLC assay with fluorescence detection.
Journal of Chromatographic Science, 49(5), 401-404.
Doménech-Carbó, A., Ibars, A.M., Prieto-Mossi, J., https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/49.5.401
Estrelles, E., Doménech-Carbó, M.T., Ortiz-Miranda,
A.S., Martini, M., & Lee, Y. (2017). Access to Phylog- Gül, A., & Pehlivan, T. (2018). Antioxidant activities of
eny from Voltammetric Fingerprints of Seeds: the some monofloral honey types produced across TurAsparagus Case. Electroanalysis, 29(2), 643-650. key. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 25(6), 1056https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600588
1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.02.011
Elad, Y. (1992). The use of antioxidants (free radical
scavengers) to control grey mould (Botrytis cinerea)
and white mould (Sclerotinia sclerotiomm) in various
crops. Plant Pathology, 41(4), 417-426. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1992.tb02436.x
Garedew, A., Schmolz, E., & Lamprech, I. (2003). The
antimicrobial activity of honey of the stingless bee
Trigona spp. Journal of Apicultural Science, 47(1),
37-49.
http://www.jas.org.pl/The-antimicrobialactivity-of-honey-of-the-stingless-bee-i-Trigonaispp-,0,145.html
Głód, B.K., Czapski, G.A., & Haddad, P.R. (2000). Application of high-performance liquid chromatography to
the investigation of free radical reactions in biological
systems. TrAC Trends in Analytical, 19(8), 492-497.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(00)00018-2
Hoyos-Arbeláez, J., Vázquez, M., & Contreras-Calderón, J. (2017). Electrochemical methods as a
tool for determining the antioxidant capacity of
food and beverages: A review. Food Chemistry,
221, 1371-1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.017
Junie, L.M., Vică, M.L., Glevitzky, M., & Matei, H.V.
(2016). Physico-chemical characterization and antibacterial activity of different types of honey tested
on strains isolated from hospitalized patients. Journal of Apicultural Science, 60(1), 5-17. https://doi.
org/10.1515/jas-2016-0013
Masek, A., Chrzescijanska, E., & Zaborski, M. (2014).
Antioxidative Properties of Silymarin, 7-aminoflavone, Neohesperidin Dihydrochalcone and Trihydroxyethylenorutin Studied by the Electrochemical
Methods. International of Journal of ElectrochemiGłód, B.K., Haddad, P.R., & Alexander, P.W. (1992). cal Science, 9(12), 7875-7889. http://www.electroPotentiometric detection of carboxylic-acids and chemsci.org/papers/vol9/91207875.pdf
inorganic anions in ion-exclusion chromatography
using camphorsulphonic acid as eluent. Journal of Maurya, S., Kushwaha, A.K., Singh, S., & Singh, G.
Chromatography, 589(1-2), 209-214. https://doi. (2014). An overview on antioxidative potential of
org/10.1016/0021-9673(92)80024-O
honey from different flora and geographical origins, Indian Journal of Natural Products and ReGłód, B.K., Kaczmarski, K., & Baumann, M.H. (2006). sources, 5(1), 9-19. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/hanApplication of Mass Spectrometry to the Determi- dle/123456789/27471
nation of Total Antioxidant Potential. Chemia Analityczna (Warsaw), 51, 51-64.
Ortiz-Miranda, A.S., Koenig, P., Kahlert, H., Scholz.
F., Osete-Cortina, L., Doménech-Carbó, M.T.,
Głód, B.K., Kiersztyn, I., & Piszcz, P. (2014). Total anti- Doménech-Carbó, A. (2016). Voltammetric analysis
90
J. APIC. SCI. Vol. 63 No. 1 2019
of Pinus needles with physiological, phylogenetic, 805428-4.00006-4
and forensic applications. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 408(18), 4943-4952. https://doi. Sužnjević, D.Ž., Pastor, F.T., & Gorjanović, S.Ž. (2015).
org/10.1007/s00216-016-9588-7
DC polarographic examination of Hg2+ reduction
applicability to antioxidant activity determination.
Piszcz, P., Woźniak, M., Asztemborska, M., & Głód, B.K. Electrochimica Acta, 168, 240-245. https://doi.
(2014). Comparative Analysis of Antioxidative Ac- org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.04.008
tivity of Flavanoids Using HPLC-ED and Photometric Assays. Food Analytical Methods, 7, 1474-1480. Wantusiak, P.M., Piszcz, P., & Głód, B.K. (2012). A Fast
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-013-9776-4
and Simple Method for the Measurement of Total
Antioxidant Potential and a Fingerprint of AntioxiPiszcz, P., Żurawski, K., & Głód, B.K. (2014). Appli- dants, Journal of Chromatographic Science, 50(10),
cation of HPLC to Study the Reaction of Free 909-913. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bms089
Radicals with Antioxidants and/or Toxins. Journal of Chemistry, Article ID 385908. http://dx.doi. Waś, E., Szczęsna, T., Rybak-Chmielewska, H., Teper,
org/10.1155/2014/385908
D., Jaśkiewicz, K. (2017). Application of HPLC-DAD
Technique for Determination of Phenolic ComPontis, J.A., Mendonça Alves da Costa, L.A., Reis da pounds in Bee Pollen Loads. Journal of Apicultural
Silva, S.J., & Flach, A. (2014). Color, phenolic and fla- Science, 61(1), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1515/jasvonoid content, and antioxidant activity of honey 2017-0009
from Roraima, Brazil. Food Science and Technology, 34(1), 69-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101- Wieczorek, J., Pietrzak, M., Pomianowski, J., & Wiec20612014005000015
zorek, Z. (2014). Honey as a source of bioactive compounds. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 29(3),
Raz, N., & Daugherty, A.M. (2018). Pathways to Brain 275-285.
http://www.uwm.edu.pl/polish-journal/
Aging and Their Modifiers: Free-Radical-Induced En- sites/default/files/issues/articles/wieczorek_et_
ergetic and Neural Decline in Senescence (FRIENDS) al._2014.pdf
Model - A Mini-Review. Gerontology, 64(1), 49-57.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000479508
Wilczyńska, A. (2010). Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different types of polish honey. Polish
Sharan, R.N., Odyuo, M.M., & Purkayastha, S. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 60(4), 309(2011). Oxygen Free Radicals and Their Biomed- 313. http://journal.pan.olsztyn.pl/fd.php?f=1266
ical Implications: A Mini Review. Mini-Reviews
In Organic Chemistry, 8(4), 372-376. https://doi. Wróblewska, A., Warakomska, Z., & Koter, M. (2006).
org/10.2174/157019311797440344
Pollen analysis of bee products from the North-Eastern Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 50(1), 71Singleton, V.L., Orthofer, R., & Lamuela-Raventós, 83.
http://www.jas.org.pl/Pollen-analysis-of-beeR.M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other ox- products-from-the-North-Eastern-Poland,0,82.html
idation substrates and antioxidants by means of
Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. Methods in Enzymology Wróblewska, A., & Stawiarz, E. (2004). Pollen spec299(1), 152-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076- trum of some honeys from Opatów vicinity. Journal
6879(99)99017-1
of Apicultural Science, 48(2), 23-33. http://www.jas.
org.pl/Pollen-spectrum-of-some-honeys-r-nfromSmirnov, A.I. (2017). Electron Spin Resonance In Opatow-vicinity,0,41.html
Food Science, Chapter 6 – Electron Paramagnetic
Resonance Spectroscopy to Study Liquid Food and
Beverages. (pp. 83-109). Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-
91