Received XXX;
Revised XXX;
Accepted XXX
DOI: xxx/xxxx
ARTICLE TYPE
CCD 𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶 Photometry of the Open Clusters Juchert 9
and Berkeley 97
İnci Akkaya Oralhan*1 | Raúl Michel2 | Yonca Karslı1 | Hikmet Çakmak3 | Hwankyung
arXiv:1911.12980v1 [astro-ph.GA] 29 Nov 2019
Sung4 | Yüksel Karataş3
1 Department
of Astronomy and Space
Sciences, Science Faculty, Erciyes
University, TR-38039, Kayseri, Turkey
2 Observatorio Astronómico Naciona,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México, Apartado Postal 877, C.P. 22800,
Ensenada, B.C, México
3 Department of Astronomy and Space
Sciences, Istanbul University Science
Faculty, 34116, Üniversite-Istanbul, Turkey
4 Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro,
Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05006, Korea
Correspondence
*İnci Akkaya Oralhan Email:
iakkaya@erciyes.edu.tr
The CCD 𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶 photometry of the poorly studied open clusters Juchert 9
(Juc 9) and Berkeley 97 (Be 97), which are observed with the 0.84 m telescope at the
San Pedro Mártir National Observatory, México has been analysed. For the likely
cluster members, we determined the reddenings, E(B-V)=0.82±0.04 (Juc 9) and
E(B-V)=0.87±0.05 (Be 97), from the early type stars. Our distance moduli/distances
for only (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) colour are (V0 -M𝑉 , d(kpc)) = (13.40±0.10, 4.8±0.2 kpc) (Juc 9)
and (12.40±0.12, 3.0±0.2 kpc) (Be 97), respectively. The Gaia DR2 distances are
d=4.5±1.2 kpc (Juc 9) and d=3.1±0.7 kpc (Be 97) from the median parallaxes with
𝜎𝜛 ∕𝜛 < 0.20, which are in good agreement with the photometric distances within
the uncertainties. The solar abundance PARSEC isochrones give us the intermediate
ages, 30±10 Myr for Juc 9 and 100±30 Myr for Be 97.
KEYWORDS:
(Galaxy:) open clusters and associations:individual Juc 9 and Be 97, Galaxy: abundances, Galaxy:
evolution
1
INTRODUCTION
The majority of the stars in the Galaxy are formed in groups
as star clusters. One of the groups called open clusters (OCs)
can be divided into three age regimes (Sung et al. , 2013);
young (Age < 10 Myr), intermediate age (10 Myr < Age <
700 Myr) and old age (Age > 700 Myr). Intermediate and old
age open clusters play an important role in studying the theories of stellar evolution and chemical evolution of the Galaxy
as well as dynamical evolution. OCs have also been used to
study the temporal and spatial evolution of the Galaxy (Buckner & Froebrich , 2014). Young OCs give valuable information
on the stellar evolution of massive stars, current star formation
processes as well as on the evolution of low-mass pre-main
sequence (PMS) stars. OCs are also powerful probes to study
the spiral structure of the Galaxy. It is widely accepted that
spiral arms are the preferred sites of star formation. They may
be traced by young objects such as giant molecular clouds,
H II regions, OB stars, blue and red supergiants and young
open/embedded clusters. As massive stars are still in the main
sequence or evolved stages, young and intermediate age open
clusters are ideal targets of studying the stellar initial mass
function in a wide mass range.
The spiral arm structure of the outer region beyond the
Perseus arm is still uncertain. Considering the importance of
the spiral arm structure in the outer zones of the Milky Way, we
have concentrated poorly studied open clusters, Juchert 9 (Juc
9) and Berkeley 97 (Be 97) as a part of the Sierra San Pedro
Mártir National Astronomical Observatory (SPMO) open cluster survey (Schuster et al. (2007),Tapia et al. (2010), Akkaya
Oralhan et al. (2010),Akkaya Oralhan et al. (2015),Akkaya
Oralhan et al. (2019).)
The two OCs occupy the second Galactic quadrant. Juc 9 lies
close to the Outer arm, whereas Be 97 is located at the Perseus
spiral arm (Fig. 1).
We present the astrophysical parameters such as interstellar reddening 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ), distance modulus (𝑉0 –𝑀V ), distance
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
2
TABLE 1 Coordinate and observation summary.
Cluster
𝛼2000 (h m s)
FIGURE 1 Spatial distribution (𝑋, 𝑌 ) (kpc) (filled
red dots) of Juc 09 and Be 97. The estimation of (𝑋, 𝑌 ) (kpc)1 . The image is adapted from
https://www.universetoday.com/102616/our-place-in-the-galactic-neighborhood-just-got-an-upgrade, credit by Robert
Hurt, IPAC; Bill Saxton, NRAO/AUI/NSF.
𝑑 (kpc) and Age from our CCD 𝑈𝐵𝑉(𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶 observations.
Gaia DR2 proper motion and parallax (Brown et al. , 2018)
are utilise to select the likely members of two OCs. Note that
no spectroscopic observations of the two OCs are available in
the literature. The intermediate age OCs (10 Myr < Age < 700
Myr) (194 OCs) in the second Galactic quadrant is 5% of 3600
OCs in the catalogue of Kharchenko et al. (2013). The distances of 146 OCs are less than 3000 pc, whose distance is
similar to Be 97. The rest 48 OCs are at 3–10 kpc. In this sense
these new astrophysical parameters of the two OCs will contribute to the understanding of the structure of second Galactic
quadrant.
The equatorial and Galactic coordinates from Kharchenko
et al. (2013) are listed in Table 1. The star charts of Juc 9 (top
panel) and Be 97 (bottom panel) with the field of view of SPM
detector (blue rectangle), are displayed in Fig. 2.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 describes the
observations and data reductions. The membership selection of
the clusters is presented in Section 3. The astrophysical parameters such as reddening, distance modulus/distance and age are
determined in Sections 4 and 5. Discussion and Conclusion are
presented in Section 6.
Juc 09
03 55 21
Be 97
22 39 28
𝛿2000 (◦ ′ ′′ )
+58 23 30
+58 59 51
𝓁 (◦ ), b (◦ )
145.12, +3.68
106.64, +0.36
Air mass
1.166 – 1.200
1.297 – 1.368
80, 900
50, 500, 400
30, 200, 200
20,120
18, 120, 100
30, 900
2,10, 400
2, 30, 200
1,20,100
2x2,20,100
Filter U Exp.Time (s)
Filter B Exp.Time (s)
Filter V Exp.Time (s)
Filter R Exp.Time (s)
Filter I Exp.Time (s)
FIGURE 2 The star charts of AAVSO2 of Juc 9 (top) and
Be 97 (bottom) with the field of view of SPM detector (blue
rectangle), 7.4 (E-W) ×9.3 (S-N) arcmin2 . Big plus symbol
shows the center of the cluster.
2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA
REDUCTION
1
The (𝑋, 𝑌 ) (kpc) locations in the Galactic plane are calculated from their
Galactic coordinates (Table 1), the Galactocentric distance of the Sun (𝑅⊙ =
8.3 ± 0.23 kpc - (Brunthaler et al. , 2011)) and the photometric distances of the two
OCs (Table 5). The position of these clusters are plotted in currently accepted spiral
arm structure of the Galaxy in Fig. 1.
2 https://www.aavso.org/apps/vsp/
Observations of Juc 9 and Be 97 were carried out at the SPMO,
during photometric nights on the date of June 7-10, 2013 UT
using the 0.84-m (f/15) Ritchey-Chretien telescope equipped
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
3
TABLE 2 Coefficients of the transformation equations.
Filter
Colour
U
U-B
𝜁𝜆
2.567±0.009
𝑘𝜆
0.452±0.005
𝜂𝜆
−0.053±0.005
0.025
93
U
U-V
2.578±0.010
0.459±0.006
−0.035±0.003
0.029
96
B
U-B
1.272±0.005
0.223±0.003
−0.019±0.003
0.014
93
B
B-V
1.287±0.006
0.224±0.003
−0.03±0.004
0.016
119
𝑟𝑚𝑠
points
V
B-V
1.330±0.007
0.126±0.004
0.025±0.004
0.019
119
V
V-R
1.328±0.007
0.127±0.004
0.039±0.007
0.020
136
R
V-R
1.274±0.007
0.088±0.004
−0.001±0.006
0.019
136
R
R-I
1.274±0.006
0.091±0.003
−0.014±0.005
0.016
122
I
V-I
1.764±0.008
0.073±0.004
−0.039±0.004
0.021
118
I
R-I
1.754±0.009
0.082±0.005
−0.090±0.008
0.026
122
TABLE 3 The mean photometric errors of V, (𝑅−𝐼), (𝑉 −𝐼),
(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) and (𝑈 − 𝐵) for Juc 9 and Be 97.
V
12-13
13-14
14-15
15-16
16-17
17-18
18-19
19-20
20-21
<𝜎𝑉 >
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.007
0.011
0.030
13-14
14-15
15-16
16-17
17-18
18-19
19-20
20-21
0.001
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.024
0.014
0.058
Juc 9
<𝜎𝑅−𝐼 >
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.008
0.017
Be 97
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.009
0.012
0.015
0.020
<𝜎𝑉 −𝐼 >
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.011
0.035
<𝜎𝐵−𝑉 >
0.006
0.009
0.008
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.017
0.040
-
<𝜎𝑈 −𝐵 >
0.005
0.008
0.006
0.008
0.011
0.022
0.049
-
0.006
0.007
0.007
0.008
0.010
0.015
0.022
0.062
0.003
0.010
0.005
0.004
0.008
0.026
0.071
0.148
0.003
0.010
0.004
0.004
0.017
0.060
-
with the Mexman filter wheel and the ESOPO CCD detector. Seeing was very good (0′′ .60 in V long exposure image).
The ESOPO detector, a 2048x2048 13.5-𝜇𝑚 square pixels E2V
CCD42-40, has a gain of 1.65 e− /ADU and a readout noise 3.8
e− at 2×2 binning. The combination of telescope and detector
ensures an unvignetted field of view of 7.4×9.3 arcmin2 .
Each OC was observed through the Johnson’s 𝑈 𝐵𝑉 and the
Kron-Cousins’ 𝑅𝐼 filters with short and long exposure times
in order to properly record both bright and faint stars in the
region. Standard star fields (Landolt , 2009) were also observed
at zenith ≈ 60 degrees and at meridian to properly determine
the atmospheric extinction coefficients. Exposure times used
for the observations are given in rows 5–9 of Table 1. Flat
fields were taken at the begining and end of each night, and
bias images were recorded between cluster observations. Data
reduction was carried out by one of the authors (R.M.) with
the IRAF/DAOPHOT3 package (Stetson , 1987).
3
IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Observatories, operated by the
Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative
agreement with the National Science Foundation.
FIGURE 3 The differences of 𝑉 -mag and colour indices (𝐵 −
𝑉 ), (𝑉 − 𝐼), (𝑅 − 𝐼), (𝑈 − 𝐵) against 𝑉 -mag for Be 97. Δ
means our - Glushkova et al. (2013).
Standard magnitude for a given filter 𝜆 is obtained using the
following relation.
𝑀𝜆 = 𝑚𝜆 − 𝑘𝜆 𝑋 + 𝜂𝜆 𝐶 + 𝜁𝜆
(1)
where m𝜆 , k𝜆 , C and X are observed instrumental magnitude,
extinction coefficients, colour index and air mass, respectively.
M𝜆 , 𝜂𝜆 , 𝜁𝜆 are standard magnitude, transformation coefficient
and photometric zero point, respectively. More details on data
reduction can be found in the papers of Akkaya Oralhan et al.
(2010), Akkaya Oralhan et al. (2015) and Akkaya Oralhan et
al. (2019). The resulting coefficients for a given filter (Col. 1)
with respect to the relevant colour (Col. 2) are listed in Table
2. The rms deviation (Col. 6) and number of stars used in the
fit (Col. 7) are also presented in Table 2.
The mean photometric errors in magnitude and colours of
the two OCs are listed in Table 3. The photometric errors for
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
4
faint stars (V > 18 mag) increase rapidly due to the small size
of the telescope used in the observation. Our photometry is
shallower than 2MASS (Skrutskie et al. , 2006), IPHAS (Drew
et al. , 2005) and GAIA (Arenou et al. , 2018) by about 1 mag,
3 mag and 2 mag, respectively.
Note that there is no reported photometric study on Juc 9.
Our photometry for Be 97 is compared with Glushkova et al.
(2013). For common stars, differences of Δ𝑉 , Δ(𝐵 − 𝑉 ),
Δ(𝑉 − 𝐼) and Δ(𝑅 − 𝐼) are displayed in Fig. 3. Here, the difference Δ is in the sense that our photometry minus Glushkova
et al. (2013). For the interval of 13 < 𝑉 < 18, the V magnitudes of Glushkova et al. (2013) seem to be slightly fainter. Our
(𝑉 −𝐼) values are somewhat redder for the same V-mag range.
Whereas our (R-I) colour is slightly bluer than Glushkova et al.
(2013). For 13 < 𝑉 < 18, our (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) values are in good consistent with the ones of Glushkova et al. (2013). For 𝑉 < 18
and 𝑉 < 19, the mean value and standard deviation of the
differences are indicated in the panels of Fig. 3.
3
MEMBERSHIP SELECTION
We have utilised Gaia DR2 proper motions (Brown et al. ,
2018) to select the probable cluster members of Juc 9 and
Be 97. The stars in our photometric catalog are matched
with the Gaia DR2 sources. The cluster stars of the two
OCs are shown as black filled dots on the (𝜇𝛼 , 𝜇𝛿 ) diagram in Fig. 4. The members of both OCs are almost clustered around (𝜇α , 𝜇δ )=(−0.189±0.094, −0.020±0.136) and
(𝜇α , 𝜇δ )=(−2.759±0.102, −1.820±0.099) mas yr−1 , respectively. The fitted proper motion radii of 0.3 mas yr−1 represent
well the likely cluster members. These fits have been made
by eye on a circle in the 𝜇𝛼 versus 𝜇𝛿 plot until the probable
members provide good single stellar sequence on (𝐺, 𝐺𝐵𝑃 −
𝐺𝑅𝑃 ) and (𝑉 , 𝐵 − 𝑉 ) diagrams (bottom panels of Fig. 4).
The stars within the blue circles are used to calculate both
the median
√ values (< 𝜇α > and < 𝜇δ >) and the quantity
𝜇R = (𝜇α − < 𝜇α >)2 + (𝜇δ − < 𝜇δ >)2 ). The grey dots of
Fig. 4 denote the background/foreground field stars for a region
(R = 15 arc min) centered on our target OCs. The inset plots
show the likely cluster members inside the proper motion circles of Juc 9 (39 members) and Be 97 (50 members). The
big red pluses indicate the median values of proper motion
components. These likely cluster members are considered for
determining the astrophysical parameters on colour-colour and
colour-magnitude diagrams of the two OCs.
The angular sizes are determined as 𝜃 ∼ 0.08 deg (0.0014
in rad) for Juc 9 and 𝜃 ∼ 0.07 deg (0.0012 in rad) for Be 97.
The diameter of a cluster can be determined from its distance
(Table 5) and angular size. The diameters of Juc 9 and Be 97
are 6.7 pc and 3.7 pc, respectively. In addition, the radius of
TABLE 4 E(V-𝜆)/E(B-V) ratios (Col. 2) in terms of four
colour indices (Col. 1). R𝑉 values are the weighted averages of
four colours. Here 𝜆 is I, J, H and K𝑠 . N (last column): cluster
star numbers.
Colour
V-I
V-J
V-H
V-K𝑠
E(V-𝜆)/E(B-V)
Juc 9
1.309±0.058
2.306±0.111
2.607±0.129
2.799±0.119
R𝑉 =3.10±0.07
N
13
14
14
14
E(V-𝜆)/E(B-V)
Be 97
1.274±0.030
2.243±0.068
2.589±0.083
2.724±0.107
N
13
14
14
14
R𝑉 =3.05±0.05
𝜇 = 0.3 mas yr−1 can give the maximum tangential velocity of stars in the cluster. These data can be used to check the
stability of the cluster. The maximum tangential velocity of
stars in Juc 9 and Be 97 is 6.8 km s−1 (Juc 9) and 4.3 km s−1
(Be 97), respectively, from the relation, 𝑉𝑡𝑎𝑛 = 4.74𝜇 ×𝑑(𝑘𝑝𝑐).
These values indicate that the virial mass of each cluster is
about 𝑀𝑣𝑖𝑟 = 36000𝑀☼ and 𝑀𝑣𝑖𝑟 = 7900𝑀☼ , respectively, which are far larger than the cluster masses, 420 𝑀☼
(Juc 9) and 620𝑀☼ (Be 97), respectively. The cluster masses
are obtained from the PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al. ,
2012) and Salpeter IMF (Salpeter , 1955). In this sense they
may be in the state of dynamically unstable against the perturbation from the outside. And therefore, the cluster stars may
be currently evaporating.
4
REDDENINGS OF JUC 9 AND BE 97
The (𝑈 − 𝐵), (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) (CC) and (𝑉 , 𝑈 − 𝐵) diagrams of Juc 9
and Be 97 are presented in Figs. 5 and 6. It appears that the
two OCs contain some early-type stars, which are considered
to be members of young open clusters. From early type stars
with (𝑈 − 𝐵) < 0.30 on Figs. 5(a) and 6(a), the mean interstellar reddenings are estimated as 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) = 0.82±0.04 for
Juc 9 and 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )=0.87±0.05 for Be 97, respectively. For
these estimates, the intrinsic values of (𝑈 − 𝐵)0 , (𝑉 − 𝐼)0 ,
(𝑅 − 𝐼)0 , (𝑉 − 𝐽 )0 , (𝑉 − 𝐻)0 , (𝑉 − 𝐾𝑆 )0 relative to (𝐵 − 𝑉 )0
have been used in tables 2–3 of Sung et al. (2013). Here we
also adopt colour excess ratio 𝐸(𝑈 − 𝐵) = 0.72𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) +
0.025𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )2 of Sung et al. (2013). According to these
mean reddening values, the reddened colour sequence of the
Schmidt-Kaler (SK82) (blue curves) is fitted to the diagrams
of two OCs. According to Guetter & Vrba (1989), colour
excess ratio of optical-near infrared colours is related to the
total-to-selective extinction ratio. We estimated the reddening 𝐸(𝑉 − 𝐼), 𝐸(𝑉 − 𝐽 ), 𝐸(𝑉 − 𝐻), and 𝐸(𝑉 − 𝐾𝑆 using
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
5
FIGURE 4 The 𝜇𝛼 versus 𝜇𝛿 for Juc 9 (115 filled dots, left panels) and Be 97 (139 filled dots, right panels). The field stars inside
15 arcmin are shown with small grey dots. The fitted proper motion circles denote the radii of 0.3 mas yr−1 , which are considered
as the likely members. The big red pluses indicate the median values. A single stellar cluster sequences of the probable members
(filled dots of bottom panels) are separated out on (𝐺, 𝐺𝐵𝑃 − 𝐺𝑅𝑃 ) and (𝑉 , 𝐵 − 𝑉 ) diagrams.
the intrinsic colour relation of O- and B-type stars (Sung et
al. , 2013), and then calculated the ratios. The ratios and the
derived 𝑅𝑉 are shown in Table 4. 𝑅𝑉 is the weighted average of four colour indices. These reddening values have been
utilised for deriving the distance moduli (distances) and ages
of the two OCs. For (𝐺𝐵𝑃 − 𝐺𝑅𝑃 ), we have used the relation
of 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) = 0.775𝐸(𝐺𝐵𝑃 − 𝐺𝑅𝑃 (Bragaglia et al. , 2018).
Normally (𝑅 − 𝐼) colour is useful for very red stars with
no (𝑉 − 𝐼) colour. However, the colour excess ratio 𝐸(𝑅 −
𝐼)∕𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) is uncertain and its dependence to the reddening
law is still unclear. In addition, 𝑅 magnitude may be affected
by 𝐻𝛼 emission as well. These are the reasons why we do not
include 𝐸(𝑅 − 𝐼)∕𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) in Table 4. Nevertheless, we estimate the ratio 𝐸(𝑅 − 𝐼)∕𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) as 0.67±0.03 for Juc 9
and 0.70±0.03 for Be 97, respectively in order to present the
astrophysical parameters for (𝑅 − 𝐼) colour.
The solar abundance PARSEC isochrone (red curve) of
Bressan et al. (2012) on (𝑉 , 𝑈 − 𝐵) (panels b of Figs. 5 and
6) is fitted to the lower ridgeline of main-sequence (MS) band
and turn-off point. However, the distribution is affected by the
effects of evolution and binarity. The likely cluster members
seem to be quite close to the reddened isochrone.
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
6
FIGURE 5 (𝑈 − 𝐵), (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) (panel a) and (𝑉 , 𝑈 − 𝐵) (panel
b) of Juc 9. The blue curve shows the reddened relation of MS
stars from SK 82. Filled and grey dots denote the members and
non-members, respectively. The arrow denotes the reddening
vector. In panel (b) the red curve indicates the reddened solar
abundance PARSEC isochrone.
5
DISTANCE MODULUS AND AGE
To determine the distance moduli (DMs) and ages of Juc 9 and
Be 97 from the colour magnitude diagrams (CMDs) (Figs. 7
and 8 and Figs. 9 and 10), the solar abundance (Z =+0.015)
PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al. , 2012) are adopted. The
reddened isochrones are calculated according to the reddening and 𝑅𝑉 obtained above. The PARSEC isochrones are first
FIGURE 6 (𝑈 − 𝐵), (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) (panel a) and (𝑉 , 𝑈 − 𝐵) (panel
b) of Be 97. The symbols are the same as Fig. 5. The filled
circle denotes the star, HD 240015.
shifted both vertically and horizontally according to the interstellar reddening. Then the PARSEC isochrones have been
shifted vertically to obtain the best fit to the observed main
sequence. From this process, we determined the distances of
the two OCs. And then we find the best fit isochrone which
deliniates the MS turnoff and the location of evolved red giant
stars. Different CMDs give slightly different distance moduli. The error in eye-fitting to the MS band is about 0.1 mag.
We adopt the error in distance modulus as the quadratic sum
of scatter in DMs and eye-fitting error. The error in the age
is obtained by jiggling bright/faint-ward the isochrone curve
until a good fit of the lower/upper main sequences produce the
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
7
FIGURE 7 (𝑉 , 𝐵 − 𝑉 ) (panel a) and (𝑉 , 𝑉 − 𝐼) (panel b) diagrams of Juc 9. Solid red curves show the PARSEC isochrones
(Bressan et al. , 2012) with Z =+0.015. Filled and grey dots
show the members and the non-members, respectively.
FIGURE 8 (𝑉 , 𝑅 − 𝐼) (panel a) and (𝐺, 𝐺𝐵𝑃 − 𝐺𝑅𝑃 ) (panel
b) diagrams of Juc 9. The symbols are the same as Fig. 7.
distance modulus. The derived distance moduli, distances (V0 M𝑉 , d(pc)) and ages are listed in Table 5. The comparisons of
the physical parameters with the literature are given for (𝐵−𝑉 )
(Table 6).
We also tried to determine an independent distance using
high quality Gaia astrometric data (𝜎𝜛 ∕𝜛 < 0.20). The median
value of Gaia DR2 parallaxes is 0.223 ± 0.061 mas (n=5) for
Juc 9 and 0.321 ± 0.067 mas (n=41) for Be 97. Hence the
distance from Gaia DR2 to Juc 9 and Be 97 is 4.5 ± 1.2 kpc
and 3.1 ± 0.6 kpc, respectively.
The Gaia DR2 parallaxes of two brighter stars with V<12.50
(Juc 9) are 𝜛 = 0.223±0.040 mas (d=4.5±0.8 kpc) and
0.172±0.04 mas (d=5.8±1.2 kpc), respectively. Their absolute
magnitudes are M𝑉 = −3.95 and −3.60, respectively, which
correspond to a mass ∼9.2 M☼ from PARSEC isochrone.
HD 240015 (𝑉 = 10.05, (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) = 0.572, (𝑈 − 𝐵) =
−0.411, Sp. type: B2), the bright blue star in the observed
region of Be 97, could be a member of Be 97 according to the
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
8
FIGURE 9 (𝑉 , 𝐵 − 𝑉 ) (panel a) and (𝑉 , 𝑉 − 𝐼) (panel b)
diagrams of Be 97. The symbols are the same as Fig. 7. The
filled circle denotes the star, HD 240015.
star’s proper motion. Its membership from its parallax is highly
probable considering the error of parallax. If the star were a
member of Be 97, its age might be about 9 Myr. And the mass
of the star from PARSEC isochrone corresponds to 21.4 M☼ ,
i.e. an O-type star. This is inconsistent with the spectral type of
the star. In addition, the morphology of MS turn-off between
V = 13–15 mag is slightly hooked to the right indicating being
an intermediate-age or old open cluster. Therefore, the age of
Be 97 from PARSEC isochrone is 100±30 Myr.
FIGURE 10 (𝑉 , 𝑅 − 𝐼) (panel a) and (𝐺, 𝐺𝐵𝑃 − 𝐺𝑅𝑃 ) (panel
b) diagrams of Be 97. The symbols are the same as Fig. 7.
6
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
We present the astrophysical parameters for the poorly studied two OCs in the literature. The reddenings are obtained as
𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )=0.82±0.04 for Juc 9 and 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )=0.87±0.05 for
Be 97, respectively. The discrepancies with the literature are at
a level of 0.13–0.60 (Juc 9) and 0.10–0.28 (Be 97). Note that
Kharchenko et al. (2013) present a large value of 1.42 for Juc
9. However, our 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 ) value (Be 97) is very close to the
one of Glushkova et al. (2013) within the uncertainties. For
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
9
TABLE 5 The derived fundamental astrophysical parameters
of the two OCs. The reddenings are 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )=0.82±0.04 for
Juc 9 and 𝐸(𝐵 −𝑉 )=0.87±0.05 for Be 97. Here we adopt solar
abundance value, Z=+0.015.
Juc 9
(B-V)
(R-I)
(V-I)
(G𝐵𝑃 –G𝑅𝑃 )
Be 97
(B-V)
(R-I)
(V-I)
(G𝐵𝑃 –G𝑅𝑃 )
(𝑉𝑜 –𝑀𝑉 )
13.40±0.10
13.40±0.25
13.50±0.25
13.40±0.30
d (pc)
4790±210
4790±550
5010±560
4790±660
log(A)
7.45±0.20
7.45±0.30
7.45±0.30
7.60±0.30
A (Myr)
30±10
30±10
30±10
40±20
12.40±0.12
12.30±0.20
12.20±0.20
12.30±0.15
3020±170
2880±270
2750±250
2880±200
8.00±0.10
8.00±0.10
8.00±0.10
8.15±0.15
100±30
100±30
100±30
140±60
Be 97, Buckner & Froebrich (2013) and Buckner & Froebrich
(2014) find the values of 𝐴𝐻 = 0.34 from the photometric
method and 𝐴𝐻 = 0.32 from the isochrone fitting pipeline,
respectively. These total absorptions convert into E(B-V)=0.63
and E(B-V)=0.59 from the relation of 𝐴𝐻 = 0.546𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉 )
(Dutra et al., 2002), which is smaller than our values. It is worth
to note the reddening determination from optical photometry,
especially in the (𝑈 − 𝐵, 𝐵 − 𝑉 ) diagram is accurate than that
determined from near infrared CMDs.
For four colour indices, (𝐵 − 𝑉 ), (𝑅 − 𝐼), (𝑉 − 𝐼) and (G𝐵𝑃 G𝑅𝑃 ), distance moduli, distances and ages of the two OCs
(Table 5) are in good concordance. For only (𝐵 − 𝑉 ), our distance moduli/distances are (V0 -M𝑉 , d(kpc)) = (13.40±0.10,
4.8±0.2 kpc) (Juc 9) and (12.40±0.12, 3.0±0.2 kpc) (Be 97),
respectively. The differences of distance moduli between ours
and literature fall in the intervals of 0.04–0.83 mag (Juc 9)
and 0.16–1.12 (Be 97). For the distances, the discrepancies
are almost up to level of 0.1–1.5 kpc (Juc 9) and 0.1–1.5 kpc
(Be 97). Our distances for Juc 9 and Be 97 are slightly larger
than the ones of 2MASS JHK𝑆 diagrams and are in good agreements with the GaiaDR2 distances of Cantat-Gaudin et al.
(2018) within the uncertainties (Table 6).
For 𝜎𝜛 ∕𝜛 < 0.20, the median Gaia DR2 distances (5 stars)
for Juc 9 and (41 stars) for Be 97 are d=4.5±1.2 kpc (𝜛
= 0.223±0.061 mas) and d=3.1±0.7 kpc (𝜛 = 0.321±0.067
mas), respectively. The Gaia DR2 distances of the two OCs
are in good agreement with the photometric ones within the
uncertainties (Table 5).
The Gaia DR2 parallaxes of two brighter stars with V<12.50
(Juc 9) are 𝜛 = 0.223±0.04 mas (d=4.5±0.8 kpc) and
0.172±0.04 mas (d=5.8±1.2 kpc), respectively. Their distances guarantee their membership. Their absolute magnitudes
are the following, M𝑉 = −3.95 and M𝑉 = −3.60 which
correspond to a mass ∼9.2 M☼ from PARSEC isochrone.
Although HD 240015 could be a member of Be 97 from
Gaia DR2 proper motion and parallax (𝜛 = 0.358±0.031 mas;
2790±240 pc), we consider that HD 240015 is not a member
of Be 97. There are two reasons-(1) there is a big discrepancy
in mass from the younger isochrone and its spectral type, and
(2) there is a big gap in magnitude/mass between HD 240015
and the next bright star. The MS of Be 97 is curve to the right at
V = 13.5–15.0. Therefore, the fitted PARSEC isochrone gives
the age of Be 97 as 100± 30 Myr.
Age value (30±10 Myr) of Juc 9 is in reasonable concordance with the ones of the literature (Table 6), except with the
5 Myr value of Kharchenko et al. (2013). Except with the 250
Myr of Glushkova et al. (2013) and 398 Myr of Buckner &
Froebrich (2014), our intermediate age value (100± 30 Myr)
of Be 97 is slightly older than the literature values (Table 6).
Discordances between ages of our and the literature are up to
5–26 Myr (Juc 9) and 86–300 Myr (Be 97). Discrepancies of
the distance moduli, distances and ages as compared to the
literature stem from the usage of different heavy element abundances, isochrones, reddenings and photometries, as discussed
by Moitinho (2010). However, spectroscopic observations are
needed for the memberships of brighter stars of the two OCs.
A global systematic offset of Gaia DR2 parallaxes is Δ𝜛
= −0.029 mas in terms of an inertial reference frame, emphasized by Lindegren et al. (2018). Recent values for the zero
point shift of parallax are found as Δ𝜛 =−0.045±0.009 mas
(Yalyalieva et al. , 2018), Δ𝜛 = −0.053±0.003 mas (Zinn et
al. , 2018), Δ𝜛 = −0.046±0.013 mas (Riess et al. , 2018),
respectively. A correction of 0.005 mas to the median values
of our original Gaia DR2 parallaxes give a closer distance with
a difference 0.10 kpc (Juc 9) and 0.05 kpc (Be 97).
7
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank our referee for the valuable suggestions. We wish
to thank the staff of the San Pedro Mártir Observatory. This
work has been supported by Turkish National Science Foundation (TUBITAK), Proje No: 114F123/Program code: 3501.
H.S acknowledges the support of the National Research Foundation of Korea (Grant No. NRF-2019RIA2C1009495). We
thank William Schuster for personel communication with A.
Landolt for the exact defination of filters (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶 . This paper
has made use of results from the European Space Agency
(ESA) space mission Gaia, the data from which were processed by the Gaia Data Processing and Analysis Consortium
(DPAC). Funding for the DPAC has been provided by national
institutions, in particular the institutions participating in the
Gaia Multilateral Agreement. The Gaia mission website is
http://www.cosmos.esa.int/gaia.
Akkaya Oralhan ET AL
10
TABLE 6 Comparison with the literature for Juc 9 and Be 97 for only (𝐵 − 𝑉 ) colour index.
Cluster
E(B-V)
(𝑉0 − 𝑀𝑉 )
𝑑 (pc)
𝑍
log Age
Age (Myr)
Isochrone
Photometry
Ref.
Juc 9
0.82±0.04
13.40±0.10
4790±210
+0.015
7.45±0.20
30±10
Bressan et al. (2012)
CCD 𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶
This paper
0.73
13.36
4694±216
solar
7.54
35
Bonatto et al. (2004)
2MASS
Tadross et al. (2012)
1.42
12.99
3971
solar
6.70
5
Girardi et al. (2002)
2MASS
Kharchenko et al. (2013)
0.69
12.57
3263±218
solar
7.75
56
Girardi et al. (2002)
2MASS
Bukowiecki et al. (2011)
5376±2510
(𝜛=0.186±0.087 mas)
0.87±0.05
12.40±0.12
3020±170
+0.015
8.00±0.10
100±30
Bressan et al. (2012)
0.77±0.06
11.91±0.19
2410±200
solar
8.40
250
0.75
11.28
1800±85
solar
7.30
20
0.74
11.28
1800
solar
7.55
35
Girardi et al. (2002)
2MASS
Kharchenko et al. (2013)
0.73
12.07
2589±174
solar
7.15
14
Girardi et al. (2002)
2MASS
Bukowiecki et al. (2011)
0.63
12.24
2800
0.59
11.90
2400
solar
8.60±0.10
398±92
Lejeune & Schaerer (2001)
3185±680
(𝜛=0.314±0.067 mas)
Be 97
REFERENCES
Akkaya Oralhan, Í., Schuster, W. J., Michel, R., Chavarría-K, C.,
Moitinho, A., Vázquez, R., Karataş, Y. 2010, Rev. Mexicana
Astron. Astrofis., 46, 385
Akkaya Oralhan, Í., Karataş, Y., Schuster,W.J., Michel, R., ,
Chavarría-K, C., 2015, New Astronomy, 34, 195
Akkaya Oralhan, Í., Michel, R., Schuster, W.J, Karataş, Y., Karslı, Y.,
Chavarría-K, C., 2019, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy,
40,33
Arenou, F., Luri, X., Babusiaux, C., 2018, A&A, 616, 17
Bonatto, Ch., Bica, E., Girardi, L. 2004, A&A, 415, 571
Bragaglia, A., Fu, X., Mucciarelli, A., Andreuzzi, G., Donati, P. 2018,
A&A, 619, 176
Bressan A., Marigo, P., Girardi L., Salasnich, B., Dal Cero, C.,
Rubele, S., Nanni, A., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127
Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T. et al., 2018, A&A, 616, 1G
Brunthaler, A., Reid, M.J., Menten, K.M., et.al. 2011, AN, 332, No.5,
461
Buckner, A.S.M, & Froebrich, D., 2013, MNRAS, 436, 1465
Buckner, A.S.M, & Froebrich, D., 2014, MNRAS, 444, 290
Bukowiecki, L., Maciejewski, G., Konorski, P., Strobel, A., 2011,
AcA 61, 231
Cantat-Gaudin, T., Jordi, C., Vallenari, A., Bragaglia, A., BalaguerNunez, L., Soubiran, C., Bossini, D., Moitinho, A., CastroGinard, A., Krone-Martins, A., and 3 coauthors., 2018, A&A,
618, 93
Drew, J.E., Greimel, R., Irwin, M. J, Aungwerojwit, A. et al., 2005,
MNRAS, 362,753
Dutra, C.M., Santiago, B.X., Bica, E., 2002, A&A, 383, 219
Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., Bressan, A., Chiosi, C., Groenewegen,
M.A.T., Marigo, P., Salasnich, B., Weiss, A., 2002, A&A, 391,
195
Glushkova, E.V.,Zabolotskikh, M.V., Koposov, S.E., Spiridonova,
O.I., Leonova, S.I.,Vlasyuk, V.V.,Rastorguev, A.S., 2013,
MNRAS, 429, 1102 (G13)
Guetter, H. H., & Vrba, F. J. 1989, AJ, 98, 611
Lejeune, T., & Schaerer, D., 2001, A&A, 366, 538
Kharchenko, N.V., Piskunov, A.E., Schilbach, E., Röser, S., Scholz,
R.D., 2013, A&A, 558, 53
Landolt, A.U., 2009, AJ, 137, 4186
Lindegren, L., Hernandez, J., Bombrun, A., Klioner, S. et al., 2018,
A&A, 616, A2
Moitinho, A., 2010, Star clusters: basic galactic building blocks,
Proceedings IAU Symposium No.266, eds. R.de Grijs & J.R.D.
Gaia DR2 parallax
Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018)
𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶
This paper
Girardi et al. (2002)
CCD 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐶
Glushkova et al. (2013)
Bonatto et al. (2004)
2MASS
Tadross (2008)
2MASS
Buckner & Froebrich (2013)
2MASS
Buckner & Froebrich (2014)
Gaia DR2 parallax
Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2018)
Lepine
Moraux, E., 2016, Stellar Clusters: Benchmarks of Stellar Physics and
Galactic Evolution - EES2015, EAS Publications Series, 80, 73
Riess, A.G.,Casertano, S.,Yuan, W., Macri, L., Bucciarelli, B., Lattanzi, M.G., MacKenty, J.W., Bowers, J.W. et al., 2018, AJ, 861,
126
Salpeter, E. 1955, ApJ, 121, 161
Schmidt-Kaler, Th. 1982, in Landolt-Bornstein, Numerical Data and
Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, New Series,
Group VI, Vol.2b, eds. K. Schaifers & H. H. Voigt (Berlin:
Springer), p. 14 (SK82)
Schuster, W. J., Michel, R., Dias, W., Tapia-Peralta, T., Vázquez,
R., Macfarland J., Chavarría, C., Santos, C., & Moitinho, A.
2007, Galaxy Evolution Across the Hubble Time, eds. F. Combes
and J. Paloŭs, Proceedings of the International Astronomical
Union, IAU Symposium No. 235,(Cambridge, United Kingdom:
Cambridge University Press), p. 331
Skrutskie, M.F., Cutri, R., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M.D., Schneider,
S.E., Carpenter, J.M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., 2006, AJ, 131,
1163
Stetson P. B., 1987, PASP, 99, 191
Sung, H., Lim, B., Bessell, M.S. Kim, J.S., Hur, H., Chun, M-Y., Park,
B-G., 2013, JKAS, 46, 97
Tadross, A. L., 2008, MNRAS, 389, 285
Tadross, A. L., El-Bendary, R., Osman, A., Äřsmail, N., Bakry, A.,
2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 75
Tapia, M. T., Schuster, W. J., Michel, R., Chavarría-K, C., Dias, W. S.,
Vázquez, R., & Moitinho, A., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 621
Yalyalieva, L.N., Chemel,A.A., Glushkova, E.V., Dambis, A.K.,
Klinichev,A.D., 2018, Astrophys. Bull., 73, 335
Zinn, J.C., Pinsonneault, M.H., Huber, D., Stello, D., 2018, arXiv:
1805.02650
How cite this article: Akkaya Oralhan İ, Michel R., Karslı Y.,
Çakmak H., Sun H., and Karataş Y. (XXXX), CCD 𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶
Photometry of the Open Clusters Juc 09 and Be 97, AN, XXX;XX:X–X.
How cite this article: Akkaya Oralhan İ, Michel R.,
Karslı Y., Çakmak H., Sun H., and Karataş Y. (XXXX), CCD
𝑈 𝐵𝑉 (𝑅𝐼)𝐾𝐶 Photometry of the Open Clusters Juc 09 and
Be 97, AN, XXX;XX:X–X.