Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-022-00443-5 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: The Role of Therapists’ Orientation and Perfectionism Andrea Pozza1 · Silvia Casale2 · Davide Dèttore2 Accepted: 2 February 2022 © The Author(s) 2022 Abstract Therapist’s emotional response towards patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is under-investigated. This aspect might provide valuable information about therapists’ difficulties during sessions and support supervisory practice, since a proportion of OCD patients drop out due to issues related to the therapeutic relationship. In a sample of therapists, we explored the effects of therapists’ orientation (cognitive behavioural versus psychodynamic) and perfectionistic traits on their emotional responses towards patients with OCD, controlling for other variables potentially related to emotional response towards patients (i.e., therapists’ gender/ age and patient’s comorbid personality disorders). Ninety-four therapists (74 women and 20 men; mean age = 42.07 ± 10.17 years), of which 47 (50%) had a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and 47 (50%) a psychodynamic orientation matched on gender and age, completed the Therapist Response Questionnaire and Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale. Therapists with a CBT orientation reported less negative emotional responses, i.e., lower overwhelmed/disorganized, hostile/angry, criticised/devalued, parental/protective and special/over-involved emotions towards patients than therapists with a psychodynamic orientation. Therapists with higher perfectionistic traits (i.e., parents’ expectations/evaluation) had higher hostile/angry reactions, those with higher concerns over mistakes and doubts about actions had more intense criticised/devalued emotions, while those with stronger concerns with precision, order and organization had lower disengagement responses. The present study is the first investigation which sheds some light on the emotional responses of therapists towards OCD patients. Therapists’ CBT orientation and lower perfectionistic traits might be associated with better emotions. Therapists’ emotional responses, their psychotherapeutic orientation and levels of perfectionism should be considered during supervisory practice. Keywords Obsessive–compulsive disorder · Psychotherapy · Perfectionism · Therapist · Therapeutic relationship Extended author information available on the last page of the article 13 Vol.:(0123456789) A. Pozza et al. Introduction Therapists’ Emotions Towards Patients: A Key Ingredient of the Therapeutic Relationship In a therapeutic relationship, the feelings and attitudes that therapists and clients have toward one another and how these are expressed can predict positive outcomes across a range of conditions and theoretical orientations (Fluckiger et al., 2012, 2018; Horvath et al., 2011; Norcross, 2010). This factor can be measured from three distinct perspectives: that of the rater, patient and therapist (Horvath 2000). Therapists’ emotions towards patients can be used as a source of valuable information about a patient’s intrapsychic and interpersonal functioning for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (Hayes, 2004). This clinical material can also be analysed during supervisory practice as such reactions may concern the therapist’s interpersonal/ intrapsychic world (Norcross 2005). According to the contextual model (Wampold and Imel 2015), there are three pathways through which a therapeutic relationship works: (a) a genuine relationship, (b) the creation of expectations through the explanation of symptoms and treatment, and (c) the enactment of health promoting behaviours. While the therapeutic relationship has been widely studied from the patient’s perspective, during the last decade researchers have progressively drawn their attention to therapists’ emotional reactions to patients. Betan et al. (2005) reviewed the clinical, theoretical, and empirical literature on therapists’ emotions towards patients and explored the feelings self-reported by a large sample of therapists through a practice network approach. Based on factor analyses, the authors identified eight emotional patterns (for a detailed overview of their model see Table 1). The researchers focused on emotions towards patients with personality disorders aggregated at DSM cluster level (Betan et al., 2005). Cluster A was related to criticized feelings, cluster B was associated with overwhelmed, helpless, hostile, and disengaged feelings and sexual attraction, and cluster C was associated with protective feelings (Betan et al., Table 1 Classification of therapist’s emotional responses to patient (Betan et al., 2005) Overwhelmed/Disorganized A desire to avoid or flee the patient and strong negative feelings, including dread, repulsion, and resentment Helpless/Inadequate Feelings of inadequacy, incompetence, hopelessness, and anxiety Positive/Satisfactory Experience of a positive working alliance and close connection with the patient Special/Over-involved A sense of the patient as special relative to other patients and includes “soft signs” of problems in maintaining boundaries, including selfdisclosure, ending sessions on time, and feeling guilty, responsible, or overly concerned about the patient Sexualized Sexual feelings toward the patient or experiences of sexual tension Disengaged Feeling distracted, withdrawn, annoyed, or bored in sessions Parental/Protective Wish to protect and nurture the patient in a parental way, above and beyond normal positive feelings toward the patient Criticised/Devalued Being unappreciated, dismissed, or devalued by the patient 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… 2005). This approach led to the development of the Therapist Response Questionnaire (TRQ; Betan et al., 2005), a therapist self-report tool aimed to assess emotional response to a specific patient. By asking large samples of therapists to express their emotions towards one of their patients currently in treatment for a personality disorder, other authors provided further empirical support for the model of Betan et al. (2005) and through confirmatory factor analyses, they demonstrated the discriminant validity of these emotional patterns, showing that some of them were common and others specific to personality disorders (Gazzillo et al., 2015; Tanzilli et al. 2016). However, little is known about therapists’ self-reported reactions to patients with conditions other than personality disorders. The Therapeutic Relationship: A Neglected Dimension in Psychotherapy for OCD Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling condition which affects up 2–3% of the general population (Coluccia et al., 2015; Pozza et al., 2016b, 2020, 2021; Ruscio et al., 2010). It is characterized by intrusive thoughts, mental images, or impulses (i.e., obsessions) and repetitive behaviours (i.e., compulsions) performed to neutralise distress related to obsessions (American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Cervin et al., 2020; Pozza et al., 2017). Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is the first-line psychological treatment recommended in practice guidelines (NICE, 2013; Pozza & Dèttore, 2017). The CBT model assumes that symptoms are reinforced at long-term by the temporary relief provided by compulsions and dysfunctional cognitive styles (e.g., perfectionism and uncertainty intolerance) (Clark, 2003; Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group, 2005). CBT case formulation assumes that psychotherapy works by exposing the patient to doubts and related distress, helping him/her to accept uncertainty and learn a new thinking style (Clark, 2003). However, among patients completing a standard CBT course, only 40–50% achieve remission while the others show only partial improvement or even nonresponse (e.g., Farris et al., 2013; Fisher & Wells, 2005; Öst et al., 2015). According to a meta-analysis, 15–30% of the those starting CBT drop out (Ong et al., 2016). CBT components, i.e. exposure with response prevention (ERP) and cognitive restructuring, have comparable effects when either is used as monotherapy (e.g., Olatunji et al., 2013). Trials comparing CBT with other therapies, such as thirdwave approaches, failed to demonstrate the superiority of one treatment over another (e.g., Marsden et al., 2018; Twohig et al., 2018). Recently, other theoretical orientations, including psychodynamic therapy, have received some attention in this field and manualized protocols have been developed and empirically assessed in preliminary research (Chlebowski and Gregory, 2009; King, 2017; Reichsenring and Steinert, 2016, 2017). However, further evidence about the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy is still needed. In an attempt to better understand the processes involved in psychotherapy for OCD, some authors (Maher et al., 2012; Simpson et al., 2011; Strauss et al. 2018; Vogel et al., 2006; Wheaton et al., 2016) studied common factors such as the therapeutic alliance as it is perceived by the patient (Bordin, 1979). The assessment of 13 A. Pozza et al. the emotions experienced by the therapist during treatment of patients with OCD might shed some light on the therapeutic relationship and therefore might improve the existing treatment protocols by orienting supervisory practice. The Therapeutic Relationship and Therapists’ Perfectionism Recent evidence suggests that therapists’ perfectionism, i.e. excessively high standards, is associated with clients’ retention in treatment and efficacy (Presley et al., 2017). Perfectionism is common among clinical psychologists and is negatively related to both tolerance of ambiguity and satisfaction in conducting psychotherapy (Wittenberg & Norcross, 2001). Theoretical models and empirical data by factor analyses indicate that perfectionism is a multidimensional construct including Perfectionistic Strivings and Evaluative Concerns (Flett & Hewitt, 2002; Frost et al., 1990). Perfectionistic strivings refer to those facets of perfectionism that relate to perfectionistic personal standards and a self-oriented striving for perfection. They include self-oriented perfectionism (i.e. demanding perfection of oneself) and personal standards (i.e. setting unreasonably high personal standards and goals) (Frost et al., 1990; Hewitt & Flett, 1991). This dimension was found to be related to both negative and positive processes (i.e. adaptive coping) and outcomes (i.e. psychological adjustment) (e.g., Stoeber & Otto, 2006). Conversely, perfectionistic concerns were found to be related to negative outcomes as well as socially prescribed perfectionism (i.e. perceiving others as demanding perfection of oneself), concern over mistakes (i.e. adverse reactions to failures), doubts about actions (i.e. doubts about performance abilities), and selfcriticism (the tendency to assume blame and feel self-critical towards the self) (Frost et al., 1990; Hewitt & Flett, 1991). Rationale and Hypotheses of the Study While the therapeutic relationship has been investigated according to OCD patients’ perceptions, there is no study on the therapist’s perspective. This unexplored aspect may provide important information about therapists’ difficulties during sessions and OCD patients’ interpersonal functioning. This may support supervisory practice and future improvement of psychotherapeutic intervention given the relatively high rates of drop-out. Therapists who are aware of their emotions towards patients may manage the therapeutic relationship more effectively. In addition, knowledge of therapists’ characteristics related to negative emotions may suggest matching therapists to patients in the most effective way. The advancement in the development of different theoretical approaches to psychotherapy for OCD (i.e. psychodynamic approaches) suggests the importance of assessing whether the therapeutic relationship is perceived differently by therapists with different theoretical orientations. In the CBT literature, the emphasis has been traditionally on implementing empirically supported interventions, whilst the importance of therapists reflecting upon their own emotional 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… reactions and/or traits has featured little until recently (Haarhoff, 2006). Indeed, the focus of CBT interventions is traditionally directed at reducing symptoms and it is based upon therapeutic techniques which work by directing targeting symptoms instead of using the therapeutic relationship (including the emotional reactions experienced by the therapists towards the patients) (Pozza & Dèttore, 2020). At the opposite end, the psychodynamic approach emphasizes not only that the psychotherapist’s emotional reaction is an inescapable aspect of every psychotherapy session, but also that these reactions should be used to help the patient and promote change (Jones & Pulos, 1993). Hypothesis A Therapists’ orientation (CBT versus psychodynamic) might be associated with different emotions towards patients. According to the contextual model (Wampold 2015), one of the ingredients of a good therapeutic relationship is the creation of expectations through explanation of disorder and treatment. Currently, CBT is the most effective approach for OCD, and CBT case formulation shared by the therapist and patient through a collaborative approach may help therapists manage the relationship better (Clark, 2003). Therapists with CBT skills may have a comprehensive understanding of the vicious cycles maintaining symptoms and can more effectively manage patient behaviours interfering with the therapeutic relationship (i.e. reassurance seeking). CBT formulation and skills may allow therapists to be aware of behaviours which can negatively impact the relationship. Considering all these points, we compared therapists’ emotional reactions to OCD patients across two theoretical orientations, hypothesizing that CBT orientation is related to less negative emotional reactions than the psychodynamic one. Hypothesis B Previous evidence shows that therapist perfectionism is associated with a negative therapeutic relationship. Higher therapist perfectionism, including high standards and expectations, might create high expectations in the therapist regarding patient improvement/progress. Perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty are a vulnerability/maintenance factor of OCD (Egan et al. 2011; Gentes and Ruscio, 2011; Pozza et al. 2019). During sessions, patient’s perfectionism may entrap a therapist with high perfectionism. Considering all these points, we hypothesized that high therapist’s perfectionism dimensions may be related to negative emotions towards patients regardless of theoretical orientation. Role of Therapists’ Socio‑Demographics and Patients’ Comorbid Personality Disorders We checked for other variables potentially related to emotional response, including the therapist’s gender and age and the patient’s comorbid personality disorders. Since there is no univocal evidence suggesting the role of such variables in the emotional reactions of therapists towards patients with OCD, we had no specific hypotheses regarding their role. 13 A. Pozza et al. Method Participants and Procedure A sample of therapists identified through the Italian regional rosters of licensed psychotherapists and public or private mental health centres was recruited through e-mail messages providing a detailed overview of the study’s rationale, aims and instruments. Therapists were included if they were licensed psychotherapists with CBT or psychodynamic training and orientation and if they provided written informed consent to participate. Therapists were directed to select a patient among their list of patients currently in treatment. To minimize selection biases, therapists were asked to check their calendars to identify the last patient they had met during the previous week who met the study criteria. Each therapist provided data about only one patient. Patient had to meet the following criteria: (1) primary current diagnosis of OCD, (2) aged at least 16, (3) currently in CBT or psychodynamic therapy for OCD after at least five individual sessions, (4) absence of lifetime psychosis/ bipolar disorders, (5) absence of alcohol/substance/drug addiction, (6) absence of current suicidal ideation, (7) absence of neurological disorders, (8) absence of mental retardation. Psychotherapeutic treatment had to consist of weekly individual outpatient sessions according to a CBT or psychodynamic manual. Comorbid personality disorders or other psychological conditions and concurrent psychopharmacotherapy were not considered exclusion criteria since comorbid personality disorders are quite common in this clinical population (e.g., Dèttore & Pozza, 2014) and concurrent psychopharmacological treatment is relatively frequent in clinical practice for OCD patients (Brakoulias et al., 2016). Participation was voluntary and uncompensated. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. The study used a cross-sectional design where each therapist completed the measures at only one time-point. Two groups were created: CBT therapists and psychodynamic therapists were included according to a matching design where each CBT therapist was matched by age and gender to a psychodynamic therapist. Measures Therapists completed the following self-report questionnaires. To minimize their recognizing the questionnaires, the acronyms of the measures were omitted. Therapists’ Emotional Response to Patients The Therapist Response Questionnaire (TRQ; Betan et al., 2005) is a clinician report of 79 items that assess a wide spectrum of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours expressed by the therapist toward one specific patient (e.g. “I feel bored in sessions with him/her”). Items are written in a straightforward manner, without jargon and near to clinical experience, so that the instrument can be used comparably by 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… therapists of any orientation. Therapists assess each item on a 5-point Likert scale (“Not true” = 1, “Very true” = 5). The factor structure consists of eight emotional dimensions: (1) Overwhelmed/Disorganized refers to a desire to avoid or flee the patient and strong negative feelings, including dread, repulsion, and resentment; (b) Helpless/Inadequate indicates feelings of inadequacy, incompetence, hopelessness, and anxiety; (c) Positive/Satisfactory covers the experience of a positive working alliance and close connection with the patient; (d) Special/Overinvolved describes a sense of the patient as special, relative to other patients, and includes ‘soft signs’ of problems in maintaining boundaries, including self-disclosure, ending sessions on time, and feeling guilty about, responsible for, or overly concerned about the patient; (e) Sexualized includes sexual feelings toward the patient or experiences of sexual tension; (f) Disengaged describes feeling distracted, withdrawn, annoyed, or bored in sessions; (g) Parental/Protective is characterized by a wish to protect and nurture the patient in a parental way, above and beyond normal positive feelings toward the patient; (h) Criticized/Mistreated describes feelings of being unappreciated, dismissed, or devalued by the patient. Scores on each of the subscales are yielded by computing the average score of the items that make up each emotional reaction. The Italian version (Tanzilli et al. 2016) showed acceptable to good internal consistency values across the subscales. Therapists’ Perfectionism The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS; Frost et al., 1990) is a 35-item questionnaire which includes four subscales: Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions (i.e. negative reactions to mistakes, perception of even minor errors as failure, and repeatedly doubting the quality of one’s performance), Concern with Precision, Order and Organization (i.e. usually not referring to pathological functioning, the tendency to organize behaviour and be neat), Excessively High Personal Standards (i.e. the tendency to set excessively high standards), Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation (i.e. perceiving one’s parents as having high expectations or being excessively critical). The questionnaire showed good reliability (Frost et al., 1990). The Italian version (Lombardo, 2008) showed acceptable to good internal consistency values across the subscales. Statistical Analysis Between-group comparisons were performed through one-way ANOVAs or nonparametric tests to explore differences in emotional responses, perfectionism and demographic features between CBT and psychodynamic therapists. Pearson’s bivariate correlation coefficients were calculated separately for the two therapist groups. Values were interpreted according to the following criteria (Cohen et al., 1998): 0 < r <|.30|= weak; |.30|< r <|.50|= moderate; |.50|< r <|.70|= strong; |.70|< r <|1|= very strong. A series of generalised linear models (GLMs) was calculated with maximum likelihood estimation by entering main effects of therapist characteristics (theoretical orientation, perfectionism, gender and age) and patient characteristics (presence of a comorbid personality disorder) and therapists’ 13 A. Pozza et al. emotional responses to patients as outcomes. The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 with a Bonferroni correction for multiple hypotheses. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 21.00. Results Sample’s Characteristics Ninety-four therapists were included (74 women and 20 men; overall mean age = 42.07 ± 10.17 years). Of these, 47 therapists (50%) had a CBT and 47 (50%) a psychodynamic orientation (Table 2). Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of the total sample of therapists (n = 94) Therapists’ characteristics n (%) Mean (SD) Gender Female 74 (78.70) Male 20 (21.30) Age (years) 42.07 (10.17) Marital status Single 44 (46.80) Cohabitant/married 44 (46.80) Separated/divorced 4 (4.30) Psychotherapeutic orientation CBT 47 (50) Psychodynamic therapy 47 (50) Patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics n (%) Mean (SD) Gender Female 41 (43.60) Male 53 (56.40) Age 34.67 (11.19) Presence of a comorbid personality disorder No 79 (84) Yes 15 (16) Presence of a comorbid Axis disorder No 77 (81.90) Yes 17 (18.10) 13 2 1.MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions 2. MPS Concern with Precision, Order and Organization 3. MPS Excessively High Personal Standards 4. MPS Excessive Concern with Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation 5.TRQ Helpless/Inadequate 3 4 5 .084 .489** .429** .217* ** .327 .144 6 7 .284** .070 − .161 − .117 .049 .436** .045 .148 .027 .124 .119 − .005 8 9 10 11 .295** .323** .248* 12 .267** .093 7.TRQ Positive/Satisfactory 8.TRQ Hostile/Angry 9.TRQ Criticised/Devalued 10.TRQ Special/Over-involved 11.TRQ Parental/Protective .079 .174 − .067 − .117 − .183 − .148 − .087 − .192 .128 .211 * − .054 .161 .207* − .142 − .020 .124 .112 − .056 .063 .188 .670** − .236* .553** .665** .378** .220* 6.TRQ Overwhelmed/Disorganised 13 .617 ** ** .631 ** .615 * − .166 − .138 .248 ** .617 ** .441 .406 ** .169 .299 .369** ** .079 − .243* .581 .572 ** .279 * .249 ** .612 ** .623** ** ** .496** ** .406** .343 ** .204* .240* − .016 .280 .367 12.TRQ Sexualised .093 13.TRQ Disengaged 1 MPS, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale; TRQ, Therapist Response Questionnaire. *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Table 3 Pearson’s bivariate correlations for the whole sample of therapists (n = 94) 13 A. Pozza et al. Bivariate Associations Between Therapists’ Perfectionism and Emotional Responses in the Whole Sample Correlation coefficients are shown separately for the whole sample of therapists in Table 3. Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions correlated positively and weakly to moderately with all the emotional reactions except for positive/satisfactory, sexualized, and disengaged feelings. 2. MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization did not have significant correlations with any of the feelings. Excessively High Personal Standards correlated positively and weakly only with parental protective feelings. Excessive Concern with Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation correlated positively and weakly only with hostile and angry feelings. Bivariate Associations Between Therapists’ Perfectionism and Emotional Responses in the Separate Groups Correlation coefficients are displayed separately for the two therapist groups in Table 4. Therapists’ and patients’ age and number of sessions were not related to any emotional responses and perfectionism dimensions in the CBT group. In the psychodynamic group, these variables were not related to emotional responses and perfectionism, but the number of sessions was positively and moderately related to hostile/ angry responses (more sessions were associated with more hostile/angry responses). In the CBT group, concern over mistakes and doubts about actions correlated positively and moderately with hostile/angry and criticised/devalued, while in the psychodynamic group this perfectionism dimension was associated positively and moderately with hostile/angry, overwhelmed/disorganised and special/over-involved feelings. In the CBT group, concern with precision, order and organization was not related to any emotional responses while, interestingly, in the psychodynamic group, it correlated negatively with parental/protective and disengaged feelings. In the CBT group, excessively high personal standards and excessive concern with parents’ expectations were positively and moderately associated respectively with parental/protective and hostile/angry emotions. In the psychodynamic group, these two perfectionism dimensions were not related to any emotional responses. Comparisons Between Therapist Groups on Emotional Responses CBT therapists reported significantly lower overwhelmed/disorganized, hostile/ angry and criticised/devalued emotional responses towards their OCD patients than psychodynamic therapists. No significant differences emerged between the two groups regarding the other emotional responses measured by the TRQ. The results of the comparison are presented in Table 5. 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .126 − .148 − .047 1. Therapist’s age (years) .273 .391** − .052 − .058 − .041 .101 2. Number of sessions 1 .205 − .003 .126 − .012 − .031 − .058 .108 3. Patient’s age (years) .019 1 .000 − .209 − .070 − .048 − .230 − .213 4. MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions − .061 .098 1 5. MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization − .081 .155 6. MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .123 − .191 ** * .548 .431 .280 − .043 1 .348* .089 − .141 .106 .017 .433** .232 1 .477** .233 7. MPS Excessive Concern with Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation − .105 .146 .522** .126 .496** 1 8. TRQ Helpless/Inadequate .123 .242 − .033 − .035 1 9. TRQ Overwhelmed/Disorganised 10. TRQ Positive/Satisfactory 11. TRQ Hostile/Angry 12. TRQ Criticised/Devalued .116 .056 ** .409 .191 .201 .166 ** * .288 − .085 .093 .274 − .005 .148 * .336 .258 ** − .153 − .242 − .146 − .096 .012 − .059 .074 .080 .094 .197 .136 − .132 .028 .250 .349 .106 11 12 13 14 .056 .146 .038 − .188 − .041 − .031 .037 .098 .019 .185 .213 − .031 − .104 .065 − .030 − .173 .083 − .141 * ** .355 .450 .298 .067 − .174 − .103 .146 .214 .160 .288 .100 .255 .344* − .156 .038 .192 − .125 .390** .268 .227 .186 − .128 .081 .135 − .033 .649** .742 1 .041 − .061 .219 ** .631 ** .637 ** ** .652 ** .517 .570 * 1 − .359 .133 ** − .052 ** ** .615 .696** .303* ** .695 ** .274 * 1 .368 ** ** .055 .337* .479 .012 − .40** .083 .022 .588** .205 .120 .379* .142 .148 ** .210 − .034 .377 − .189 .173 .268 .415 .730 .522 .381 .705 .182 − .098 .260 − .298* .141 .134 .304* .616** .699** .397** .221 .462** 1 15. TRQ Sexualised − .057 − .226 .231 − .073 .415** .172 .461** .508** .276 16. TRQ Disengaged .035 − .309* − .043 − .092 .639** .436** − .096 .558** .479** .705** .088 .279 − .080 − .252 ** .534 14. TRQ Parental/Protective .150 − .094 .114 ** 13. TRQ Special/Over-involved − .163 − .035 .353* .497 .514 ** .414 − .204 .094 ** 1 ** .283 16 − .027 .575** − .336* .493** ** .175 15 .491 − .032 − .060 .408** 1 .153 − .029 1 13 CBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CI, Confidence Interval; MPS, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale; TRQ, Therapist Response Questionnaire. *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Table 4 Pearson’s bivariate correlations for CBT (above the diagonal) and psychodynamic group (under the diagonal) 13 Table 5 Comparisons between CBT (n = 47) and psychodynamic therapists (n = 47) Perfectionism (MPS scales) Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions Therapist’s orientation Mean SD 95% CI Lower Upper CBT 31.89 10.793 28.72 35.06 Psychodynamic 30.53 7.843 28.23 32.83 CBT 22.45 4.889 21.01 23.88 Psychodynamic 20.57 4.481 19.26 21.89 CBT 22.26 5.507 20.64 23.87 Psychodynamic 20.85 3.873 19.71 21.99 Excessive Concern with Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation CBT 17.87 7.444 15.69 20.06 Psychodynamic 17.60 6.364 15.73 19.46 Emotional response to the patient (TRQ scales) Therapist’s orientation Mean Concern with Precision. Order and Organization Excessively High Personal Standards Helpless/Inadequate Overwhelmed/Disorganised Positive/Satisfactory Hostile/Angry Criticised/Devalued 95% CI Lower Upper 16.02 6.825 14.02 18.03 Psychodynamic 19.09 6.114 17.29 20.88 CBT 16.91 5.633 15.26 18.57 Psychodynamic 20.45 7.274 18.31 22.58 CBT 22.70 6.175 20.89 24.52 Psychodynamic 21.00 5.846 19.28 22.72 CBT 11.05 4.799 9.65 12.46 Psychodynamic 14.23 5.984 12.45 16.01 9.51 3.296 8.54 10.48 12.97 CBT 11.77 4.108 10.56 CBT 8.74 2.907 7.89 9.59 Psychodynamic 9.60 3.375 8.60 10.61 p-value 0.490 0.486 3.746 0.056 2.045 0.156 0.037 0.847 F(1. 93) p-value 5.254 0.024 6.927 0.010 1.883 0.173 7.980 0.006 8.617 0.004 1.754 0.189 A. Pozza et al. CBT Psychodynamic Special/Over-involved SD F(1. 93) Emotional response to the patient (TRQ scales) Parental/Protective Sexualised Disengaged Therapist’s orientation Mean SD 95% CI Lower Upper CBT 12.15 3.816 11.03 13.27 Psychodynamic 13.30 4.587 11.95 14.64 CBT 4.69 1.078 4.38 5.01 Psychodynamic 4.90 1.503 4.46 5.35 CBT 9.23 3.919 8.08 10.38 Psychodynamic 9.38 4.240 8.14 10.63 F(1. 93) p-value 1.743 0.190 0.596 0.442 0.031 0.860 CBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CI, Confidence Interval; MPS, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale; TRQ, Therapist Response Questionnaire Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Table 5 (continued) 13 A. Pozza et al. Table 6 Comparison between CBT and psychodynamic therapists on demographics, session number and patients’ characteristics (n = 94) Therapist’/patient’s characteristics Therapist’s orientation Mean SD 95% CI Age of the therapist (years) CBT 42.62 10.584 39.51 Psychodynamic 41.53 9.835 38.64 F(1. 93) p-value Lower Upper 45.72 0.265 Number of sessions with the patient CBT 69.25 127.311 30.54 107.96 0.108 Psychodynamic 76.88 82.002 51.33 102.43 Age of the patient (years) CBT 33.24 11.729 29.76 36.72 1.530 Psychodynamic 36.13 10.546 32.97 39.30 Therapist’s gender Patient’s gender Patient with a comorbid personality disorder 0.608 44.42 0.743 0.219 CBT (n) Psychodynamic (n) Total χ2(1) p-value Male 10 10 20 0 1.000 Female 37 37 74 Male 29 24 53 1.081 0.298 Female 18 23 41 No 40 39 79 0.079 0.778 Yes 7 8 15 CBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Comparison Between Theoretical Orientation and Therapists’ Demographics and Patients’ Characteristics The therapists’ groups were matched by age and gender and were not significantly different regarding therapists’ and patients’ demographic characteristics. The comparisons between CBT and psychodynamic therapists are shown in Table 6. Multivariate Effects of Therapists’ Orientation and Perfectionism on Emotions Towards Patients The results of the GLMs are presented in Table 7. With regard to therapist’s variables, theoretical orientation, perfectionism and gender had specific effects on specific emotional reactions to patients. CBT orientation was associated with lower overwhelmed/disorganized, hostile/angry, criticised/devalued, parental/protective and special/over-involved emotional responses to patients. Specific therapist perfectionistic traits were associated with some of the emotional reactions. In particular, higher parents’ expectations and evaluation correlated with higher hostile/angry reactions. Higher concerns over mistakes and doubts about actions were associated with more intense criticised/devalued emotions. Stronger concerns with precision, order and organization were related to lower disengagement responses. 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Table 7 General linear models: effects of therapist and patient characteristics on therapists’ emotions towards patients (n = 94) Outcome: TRQ Helpless/Inadequate 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 16.185 6.559 25.812 10.860 .001 Therapist’s male gender 1.760 − .757 4.276 1.878 .171 Therapist’s female gender 0a − .126 .121 Therapist’s age (years) − .002 CBT orientation − 3.118 − 5.642 − .595 Psychodynamic orientation 0a .001 .971 5.867 .015 3.254 .071 Absence of a comorbid personality disorder − 3.121 − 6.511 .270 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .078 − .091 .247 .821 .365 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization − .217 − .500 .066 2.264 .132 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .175 − .154 .503 1.087 .297 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .079 − .137 .295 .516 .473 Patients’ age (years) .040 − .074 .155 .476 .490 Outcome: TRQ Overwhelmed/Disorganized 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 18.516 8.846 28.187 14.083 .000 Therapists’ male gender 1.781 − .747 4.309 1.907 .167 Therapists’ female gender 0a − .194 .054 Therapists’ age (years) − .070 1.238 .266 CBT orientation − 3.856 − 6.392 − 1.321 8.890 .003 Psychodynamic orientation 0a Absence of a comorbid personality disorder − 1.278 − 4.684 2.129 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a .540 .462 MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .147 − .023 .317 2.890 .089 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization − .055 − .339 .229 .145 .704 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards − .022 − .352 .308 .017 .897 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .091 − .125 .308 .685 .408 Patients’ age (years) .017 − .099 .132 .081 .776 Outcome: TRQ Positive/Satisfactory 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 13.551 4.370 22.732 8.368 .004 Therapists’ male gender 1.224 − 1.176 3.625 .999 .317 Therapists’ female gender 0a Therapists’ age (years) .027 − .090 CBT orientation .558 − 1.849 2.964 .145 .210 .647 .206 .650 13 A. Pozza et al. Table 7 (continued) Outcome: TRQ Positive/Satisfactory 95% CI β Psychodynamic orientation Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value − .882 5.586 2.033 .154 0a Absence of a comorbid personality disorder 2.352 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions − .023 − .184 .138 .078 .779 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization .133 − .136 .403 .937 .333 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .182 − .132 .495 1.288 .256 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .035 − .170 .241 .114 .736 Patients’ age (years) − .039 − .149 .070 .493 .483 Outcome: Hostile/Angry 95% CI Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value β Intercept 4.688 − 3.081 12.457 1.399 .237 Therapists’ male gender 1.790 − .247 3.826 2.966 .085 Therapists’ female gender 0a − .100 .099 .000 Therapists’ age (years) − .001 CBT orientation − 3.243 − 5.289 − 1.198 9.655 Psychodynamic orientation 0a Absence of a comorbid personality disorder − .445 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization .990 .002 − 3.187 2.297 .101 .751 .064 − .072 .200 .846 .358 − .035 − .265 .194 .091 .763 .458 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .101 − .165 .367 .550 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .189 .013 .365 4.419 .036 Patients’ age (years) .061 − .032 .155 1.643 .200 Outcome: TRQ Criticised/Devalued 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 8.112 3.199 13.026 10.473 .001 Therapists’ male gender 1.517 .232 2.801 5.358 .021 Therapists’ female gender 0a − .019 .106 Therapists’ age (years) .043 CBT orientation − 1.833 − 3.121 − .545 Psychodynamic orientation 0a Absence of a comorbid personality disorder − 1.404 − 3.135 .326 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .116 13 .029 .202 1.833 .176 7.782 .005 2.530 .112 6.902 .009 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Table 7 (continued) Outcome: TRQ Criticised/Devalued MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value − .057 − .201 .087 .603 .437 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards − .124 − .292 .044 2.094 .148 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .092 − .018 .202 2.674 .102 Patients’ age (years) .008 − .051 .066 .065 .799 Outcome: TRQ Special/Over-Involved 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 5.406 .798 10.015 5.288 .021 Therapists’ male gender .664 − .545 1.872 1.159 .282 Therapists’ female gender 0a − .058 .060 Therapists’ age (years) .001 CBT orientation − 1.226 − 2.439 − .012 Psychodynamic orientation 0a Absence of a comorbid personality disorder 1.655 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization .002 .969 3.919 .048 .029 3.282 3.980 .046 .012 − .069 .093 .085 .770 − .131 − .268 .005 3.571 .059 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .140 − .018 .298 3.029 .082 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .099 − .005 .204 3.479 .062 Patients’ age (years) .005 − .051 .060 .026 .871 Outcome: TRQ Parental/Protective 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 9.323 2.977 15.669 8.292 .004 Therapists’ male gender .797 − .862 2.456 .886 .347 Therapists’ female gender 0a − .104 .058 Therapists’ age (years) − .023 CBT orientation − 1.737 − 3.400 − .073 .307 .580 4.188 .041 Psychodynamic orientation 0a − 1.541 2.929 .371 .543 Absence of a comorbid personality disorder .694 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .062 − .050 .173 1.173 .279 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization − .072 − .258 .115 .570 .450 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .186 − .031 .402 2.824 .093 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .053 − .089 .195 .536 .464 Patients’ age (years) − .019 − .095 .057 .246 .620 13 A. Pozza et al. Table 7 (continued) Outcome: TRQ Sexualised 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value 5.371 3.348 7.394 27.083 .000 Therapists’ male gender .122 − .413 .657 .200 .655 Therapists’ female gender 0a Intercept Therapists’ age (years) − .007 − .033 .019 .272 .602 CBT orientation − .186 − .718 .345 .471 .492 Psychodynamic orientation 0a − .394 1.031 .766 .381 Absence of a comorbid personality disorder .318 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .009 − .026 .045 .271 .603 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization .004 − .056 .063 .014 .907 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards − .043 − .112 .026 1.507 .220 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation .010 − .036 .055 .168 .682 Patients’ age (years) − .004 − .028 .020 .109 .742 Outcome: TRQ Disengaged 95% CI β Lower Upper Wald’s χ2(1) p-value Intercept 12.846 6.736 18.956 16.979 .000 Therapists’ male gender .411 − 1.186 2.009 .254 .614 Therapists’ female gender 0a Therapists’ age (years) − .040 − .118 1.004 .316 CBT orientation .002 − 1.600 1.604 .038 .000 .998 Psychodynamic orientation 0a − 2.718 1.586 .266 .606 Absence of a comorbid personality disorder − .566 Presence of a comorbid personality disorder 0a MPS Concern over Mistakes and Doubts about Actions .053 − .054 .160 .930 .335 MPS Concern with Precision. Order and Organization − .224 − .404 − .045 5.995 .014 MPS Excessively High Personal Standards .047 − .162 .256 .194 .659 MPS Parents’ Expectations and Evaluation − .016 − .153 .121 .052 .820 Patients’ age (years) .016 − .057 .089 .187 .665 CBT, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; CI, Confidence Interval; MPS, Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale; TRQ, Therapist Response Questionnaire a Parameters are set at zero because they are redundant in the statistical model Therapist’s male gender was associated with higher criticised/devalued feelings. Absence of a comorbid personality disorder in the patient was related to higher special/over-involved reactions. 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Discussion The present study is the first investigation of the therapeutic relationship with OCD patients from the therapist’s perspective. The model proposed by Betan et al. (2005) identifies specific patterns of emotional responses experienced by therapists towards patients. However, little is known about the role of therapists’ orientation and perfectionism. Therapists’ emotional reactions to patients represent clinically informative material about patients’ interpersonal functioning and might support supervisory practice. We compared the emotional reactions to OCD patients of therapists with a CBT orientation to those with a psychodynamic one. We also explored the role of therapists’ perfectionism on emotional reactions. Overall, in the whole sample of therapists, in line with previous data regarding the maladaptive effects of perfectionism on the therapeutic alliance (Ganske et al., 2015; Zuroff et al., 2010) we found that those therapists with higher concern over mistakes and doubts about actions were more likely to report more intense emotional reactions including helpless/inadequate, overwhelmed/disorganised, hostile/angry, criticised/devalued, special/over-involved, and parental/ protective feelings except for positive feelings related to a satisfactory relationship, sexualised, and disengaged feelings towards their patients. Excessively High Personal Standards correlated positively and weakly only with parental protective feelings. Therapists with excessive concern with parents’ expectations and evaluation reported more hostile and angry feelings. Finally, therapists with higher concern with precision, order and organization did not report any emotional feelings towards patients. We found that compared to psychodynamic therapists, CBT therapists had less negative feelings on some specific emotional patterns, particularly helpless/ inadequate, overwhelmed/disorganized, hostile/angry and criticised/devalued emotional responses to patients. An interpretation of this result may be related to one of the key processes usually occurring during psychotherapy for OCD, i.e. patients’ tendency to seek more and more reassurance from therapists about the validity of their obsessional doubts (e.g., Kobori and Salkovskis 2013). CBT therapists may have more skills to manage this difficult aspect of the therapeutic relationship. Generally, OCD patients expect therapists to be able to offer immediate reassurance about their doubts and neutralize their discomfort. A therapist who is not aware of this interpersonal cycle may provide reassurance to each request with the aim of immediately reducing the patient’s discomfort; in turn, this can reactivate the patient’s doubts in the long-term thus reinforcing discomfort again. A therapist who offers reassurance may get entrapped in special and over-involved feelings (when the patient’s distress is initially reduced) but also in angry and criticised emotions because reassurance becomes more and more ineffective. We can speculate that compared to psychodynamic therapists, CBT therapists might be more aware of these interpersonal vicious cycles and more prepared to manage reassurance-seeking. These skills in CBT therapists may prevent or attenuate some interpersonal scripts which OCD patients manifest during sessions, 13 A. Pozza et al. particularly feelings of abandonment, dependence, vulnerability, and insufficient self-control (e.g., Voderholzer et al. 2014). In addition, one of the key elements of CBT which may help these therapists more effectively manage the relationship is case formulation, a therapist and patient shared goal-oriented process of understanding how OCD and therapy work (e.g., Natrass et al. 2015). CBT case formulation of OCD assumes that therapy works by exposing the patient to doubts and helping him/her to accept uncertainty (e.g., Clark, 2003). We can speculate that this element might help CBT therapists to tolerate and more effectively manage overwhelming feelings deriving from the client’s reassurance requests in the therapeutic relationship. Regarding the psychodynamic approach, there is not consensus about the most effective attitude to adopt toward OCD patients’ reassuring requests, the reason why we hypothesized that psychodynamic therapists experienced more overwhelming feelings towards patients (King, 2017). The techniques used in CBT involve exposure and response prevention. As reassurance may often be inappropriately used to counter anxiety generated by obsessive thinking, reassurance seeking may be a compulsive action that a CBT therapist would not reinforce as he/she tends to be aware of the role of providing reassurance as a reinforcing factor of OCD symptoms. CBT therapists would not become angered by reassurance-seeking, but would see that action as part of the condition and an area for treatment targeting, not something that would cause emotional distress. Therapists’ responses to patients’ reassurance requests are central for treating psychopathology also within a psychodynamic perspective. In psychodynamic psychotherapies, there is an emphasis on the evocation of affect, on bringing unconscious into awareness, and on integrating current difficulties with previous life experience, using the therapist–patient relationship as a change agent (Jones & Pulos, 1993). An explanation why CBT therapists reported less overwhelming feelings than the psychodynamic ones might be that the latter do not directly focus on symptoms (i.e., the content of obsessional doubts, the vicious cycle of reassurance seeking) and perhaps are not skilled in managing symptoms in the short term (i.e., when obsessions and compulsions arise) (McKay, 2011). Interestingly, the two therapist groups were not different on any perfectionism dimensions, indicating that perfectionism might be a transtheoretical characteristic and therefore independent of therapists’ theoretical orientations. Bivariate associations showed that in both the orientations, concerns over mistakes and doubts about actions were associated with angry feelings. In addition, this perfectionism dimension was related, respectively, to criticised emotions in the CBT group and to overwhelmed and over-involved reactions in the psychodynamic one. While in the CBT group a higher concern with precision, order and organization was not associated with any emotional patterns, it was related to lower parental/protective and disengaged feelings among the psychodynamic therapists. Interestingly, high personal standards and excessive concern with parents’ expectations were associated with parental and angry emotions in CBT therapists, while this perfectionism dimension was not related to any emotional pattern in the psychodynamic group. 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… The results of the GLMs further supported the effects found through direct comparisons of therapists’ orientations. This result suggests that some negative emotional reactions are related to the therapist’s theoretical orientation and skills. In addition, we found some therapists’ perfectionistic traits had a role regardless of orientation. Specifically, concern over mistakes and doubts about actions was associated with criticised feelings, and parents’ expectations and evaluation were related to hostile feelings. This result suggests that supervisory practice should consider these perfectionism features as interpersonal therapist characteristics potentially interfering with the therapeutic relationship with OCD patients. The role of excessively high standards was not significant, in contrast with previous research on psychotherapy processes (Presley et al., 2017). Interestingly, therapists more concerned with precision, order and organization experienced lower disengagement reactions. This result may be in line with the bidimensional model of perfectionism where this dimension may have a positive effect on the resources of the individual, i.e. coping and resiliency (Enns et al. 2005; Stoeber & Otto, 2006). Surprisingly, none of the variables examined were associated with a positive therapeutic relationship. This suggests the importance of deeply understanding what factors determine a better relationship between therapist and patient. An interpretation may be that this emotional dimension is a transtheoretical element related to alliance and common factors rather than specific techniques. Alternatively, it may be that some variables not considered in the present study have an effect: for example, patient’s adherence to therapy and symptom improvement may facilitate self-efficacy feelings in the therapist which make him/her perceive the relationship more positively. The fact that the absence of a comorbid personality disorder was associated with a better therapeutic relationship may be attributable to the fact that the presence of a comorbid personality disorder in OCD has been found to be not related to drop-out or less symptom improvement by some studies (Dèttore et al., 2013; Olatunji et al., 2013). Another interpretation may be that if the therapist is aware of a patient’s personality comorbidity, he/she may have lower expectations regarding the patient’s interpersonal functioning or may be more careful about collusion with interpersonal vicious cycles. Implications for Clinical and Supervisory Practice Since we found that some perfectionism dimensions were associated with some negative emotional reactions to patients with OCD, it is clear that reducing perfectionistic strivings and concerns might be essential to prevent their potential destructive impact on the clients’ well-being, independently of the theoretical model. Supervisory practice of therapists working with OCD clients should be focused on therapists’ perfectionism and their emotional experience towards this type of patients. Not embracing methods to reduce perfectionism might imply conveying pressure to clients, who may be deprived of learning that mistakes are inevitable and should be accepted. As Wittenberg and Norcross suggested (2001), both the CBT and the psychodynamic approach embrace methods or techniques to reducing perfectionism: restructuring of the self-destructive 13 A. Pozza et al. “shoulds,” and selective abstraction, the former; therapy’s incorporation of a less punitive superego, the latter. Cognitive restructuring, which revealed to be an effective intervention for perfectionism (DiBartolo et al., 2001; Rozental, 2020), might be introduced in supervisory sessions of therapists to target perfectionistic cognitions related to their clients with OCD. Another type of intervention that might be integrated in supervisory practice might include self-compassion exercises which may be useful for therapists with high perfectionistic tendencies and negative emotional responses towards their OCD patients, as suggested by the promising use of this intervention with psychotherapy trainees (Richardson et al., 2020). Limitations The cross-sectional design and the lack of a random assignment of therapists to patients did not allow us to ascertain a causal effect and exclude the possibility that the observed relations were spurious. In addition, another relevant issue concerns the fact that each therapist rated his/her emotions towards only one patient, as in previous studies using the TRQ (e.g., Gazzillo et al., 2015; Tanzilli et al., 2016). It could be argued that the emotions reported by the therapist in this study were related to the characteristics of a specific patient and not just to the clinical features of OCD. Therefore, further studies should assign each therapist to multiple patients with OCD and use multilevel analyses to distinguish the effects of therapist’ and patient’s features, and the effects of OCD. Future studies should also investigate whether therapists’ emotional responses predict treatment outcome and/or drop-out by a longitudinal design. It may be interesting to assess whether therapists’ emotions are associated with other patient characteristics and processes, such as interpersonal maladaptive schemas which may have an impact on the therapeutic relationship. A key issue regards the fact that novelty in working with OCD patients was not assessed, since the experience of therapists was only detected by a generic variable, i.e., therapists’ age. Therefore, future research should examine the role of this variable that could impact on the emotional reactions of therapists, for example by assessing the number of OCD patients treated in the therapists past working experience and/or the number/type of clinical trainings about OCD psychotherapy. Another point which needs investigation is the association between therapists’ emotional responses and the therapeutic alliance as perceived by patients. Our protocol may also be improved by adding other measures of therapists’ emotional responses such as observer-based or psychophysiological measures. Finally, further research may use other therapist orientations and other patient’s psychological conditions as further comparison groups such as other OCD spectrum conditions (Pozza et al., 2016a). Conclusions The present study is the first empirical investigation on the emotional responses of therapists towards patients with OCD. Therapists’ CBT orientation and lower perfectionistic traits might be associated with better emotions towards the patients suggesting 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… a better therapeutic relationship, at least from the therapist’s perspective. Supervisory practice should take into account the emotional responses experienced by the therapist and therapist’s orientation and perfectionism with the aim to monitor and improve the therapeutic relationship and potentially the effectiveness of treatment. Authors’ contributions AP designed the study, conducted the literature searchers, collected the data, analysed the data, wrote the first draft of the paper; SC designed the study, conducted the literature searches, wrote the first draft of the paper and checked the final version; DD designed the study, conducted the literature searches, collected the data, wrote the first draft of the paper and checked the final version. Funding The study did not receive any funding. Availability of data and materials Data will be made available upon request. Declarations Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licen ses/by/4.0/. References American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders-fifth edition (DSM 5). VA American Psychiatric Publishing. Betan, E., Heim, A. K., Zittel Conklin, C., & Westen, D. (2005). Countertransference phenomena and personality pathology in clinical practice: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 890–898. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16, 252. Brakoulias, V., Starcevic, V., Belloch, A., Dell’Osso, L., Ferrão, Y. A., Fontenelle, L. F., Lochner, C., Marazziti, D., Martin, A., Matsunaga, H., & Miguel, E. C. (2016). International prescribing practices in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD). Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 31, 319–324. Cervin, M., Perrin, S., Olsson, E., Aspvall, K., Geller, D. A., Wilhelm, S., McGuire, J., Lázaro, L., Martínez-González, A. E., Barcaccia, B., Pozza, A., Goodman, W. K., Murphy, T. K., Seçer, I., Piqueras, J. A., Rodríguez-Jiménez, T., Godoy, A., Rosa-Alcázar, A. I., Rosa-Alcázar, A., … Mataix-Cols, D. (2020). The centrality of doubting and checking in the network structure of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions in youth. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 59, 880–889. Chlebowski, S., & Gregory, R. J. (2009). Is a psychodynamic perspective relevant to the clinical management of obsessive-compulsive disorder? American Journal of Psychotherapy, 63, 245–256. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (1998). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. 13 A. Pozza et al. Coluccia, A., Fagiolini, A., Ferretti, F., Pozza, A., & Goracci, A. (2015). Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and quality of life outcomes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional case-control studies. Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Public Health, 12, e11037. Clark, D. A. (2003). Cognitive-behavioural therapy for OCD. The Guilford Press. Dèttore, D., & Pozza, A. (2014). Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and comorbid personality disorders. In E. M. Crowe & A. R. O’Dell (Eds.), Obsessive compulsive disorder: Symptoms, prevalence and psychological treatments (pp. 1–46). Nova Science Publishers. Dèttore, D., Pozza, A., & Coradeschi, D. (2013). Does time-intensive ERP attenuate the negative impact of comorbid personality disorders on the outcome of treatment-resistant OCD? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44, 411–417. DiBartolo, P. M., Frost, R. O., Dixon, A., & Almodovar, S. (2001). Can cognitive restructuring reduce the disruption associated with perfectionistic concerns? Behavior Therapy, 32, 167–184. Egan, S. J., Wade, T. D., & Shafran, R. (2011). Perfectionism as a transdiagnostic process: A clinical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 203–212. Enns, M. W., Cox, B. J., & Clara, I. P. (2005). Perfectionism and neuroticism: A longitudinal study of specific vulnerability and diathesis-stress models. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 463–478. Farris, S. G., McLean, C. P., Van Meter, P. E., Simpson, H. B., & Foa, E. B. (2013). Treatment response, symptom remission and wellness in obsessive-compulsive disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74, 685–690. Fisher, P. L., & Wells, A. (2005). How effective are cognitive and behavioral treatments for obsessive–compulsive disorder? A clinical significance analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1543–1558. Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2002). Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment. American Psychological Association. Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., Symonds, D., & Horvath, A. O. (2012). How central is the alliance in psychotherapy? A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 10–17. Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55, 316–340. Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468. Ganske, K. H., Gnilka, P. B., Ashby, J. S., & Rice, K. G. (2015). The relationship between counseling trainee perfectionism and the working alliance with supervisor and client. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 14–24. Gazzillo, F., Lingiardi, V., Del Corno, F., Genova, F., Bornstein, R. F., Gordon, R. M., & McWilliams, N. (2015). Clinicians’ emotional responses and Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual adult personality disorders: A clinically relevant empirical investigation. Psychotherapy, 52, 238–246. Gentes, E. L., & Ruscio, A. M. (2011). A meta-analysis of the relation of intolerance of uncertainty to symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 923–933. Haarhoff, B. A. (2006). The importance of identifying and understanding therapist schema in cognitive therapy training and supervision. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35, 126–131. Hayes, J. A. (2004). The inner world of the psychotherapist: A program of research on countertransference. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 21–36. Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456–470. Horvath, A. O. (2000). The therapeutic relationship: From transference to alliance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 1631–73. Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 9–16. Jones, E. E., & Pulos, S. M. (1993). Comparing the process in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 306–316. King, R. (2017). Psychodynamic Perspectives on OCD. In C. Pittenger (Ed.), Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Phenomenology, pathophysiology, and treatment (pp. 65–74). Oxford University Press. Lombardo, C. (2008). Adattamento italiano della Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS). Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 14, 31–46. Maher, M. J., Wang, Y., Zuckoff, A., Wall, M. M., Franklin, M., Foa, E. B., & Simpson, H. B. (2012). Predictors of patient adherence to cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 124–126. 13 Therapists’ Emotional Reactions to Patients with Obsessive–… Marsden, Z., Lovell, K., Blore, D., Ali, S., & Delgadillo, J. (2018). A randomized controlled trial comparing EMDR and CBT for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 25, e10–e18. McKay, D. (2011). Methods and mechanisms in the efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 66, 147–148. Natrass, A., Kellett, S., Hardy, G. E., & Ricketts, T. (2015). The content, quality and impact of cognitive behavioural case formulation during treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 43, 590–601. NICE. (2013). Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Evidence update september 2013. In NICE clinical guideline, 31. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg31/evidence/evidence-update-194847085 Norcross, J. C. (2010). The therapeutic relationship. In B. L. Duncan, S. D. Miller, B. E. Wampold, & M. A. Hubble (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (pp. 113–141). American Psychological Association. Obsessive Compulsive Cognitions Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory-Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1527–1542. Olatunji, B. O., Davis, M. L., Powers, M. B., & Smits, J. A. (2013). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome and moderators. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47, 33–41. Ong, C. W., Clyde, J. W., Bluett, E. J., Levin, M. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2016). Dropout rates in exposure with response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: What do the data really say? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 40, 8–17. Öst, L. G., Havnen, A., Hansen, B., & Kvale, G. (2015). Cognitive behavioral treatments of obsessive–compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published 1993–2014. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 156–169. Pozza, A., Albert, U., & Dèttore, D. (2019). Perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty are predictors of OCD symptoms in children and early adolescents: A prospective, cohort, one-year, follow-up study. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 16, 53–61. Pozza, A., Barcaccia, B., & Dèttore, D. (2017). The Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Child Version (OCICV): Further evidence on confirmatory factor analytic structure, incremental and criterion validity in italian community children and adolescents. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 31, 291–295. Pozza, A., & Dettore, D. (2017). Drop-out and efficacy of group versus individual cognitive behavioural therapy: What works best for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Psychiatry Research, 258, 24–36. Pozza, A., & Dèttore, D. (2020). Modular cognitive-behavioral therapy for affective symptoms in young individuals at ultra-high risk of first episode of psychosis: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76, 392–405. Pozza, A., Giaquinta, & Dèttore, D. (2016a). Borderline, avoidant, sadistic personality traits and emotion dysregulation predict different pathological skin picking subtypes in a community sample. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1861–1867. Pozza, A., Mazzoni, G. P., Berardi, D., & Dèttore, D. (2016b). Studio preliminare sulle proprietà psicometriche della versione italiana della Disgust Propensity and Sensitivity Scale-Revised (DPSS-R) in campioni non-clinici e campioni clinici con Disturbo Ossessivo-Compulsivo e Disturbi d’Ansia. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale, 22, 271–296. Pozza, A., Starcevic, V., Ferretti, F., Pedani, C., Crispino, R., Governi, G., Luchi, S., Gallorini, A., Lochner, C., & Coluccia, A. (2021). Obsessive-compulsive personality disorder co-occurring in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 29, 95–107. Pozza, A., Veale, D., Marazziti, D., Delgadillo, J., Albert, U., Grassi, G., Prestia, D., & Dèttore, D. (2020). Sexual dysfunction and satisfaction in obsessive compulsive disorder: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 9, 1–13. Presley, V. L., Jones, C. A., & Newton, E. K. (2017). Are perfectionist therapists perfect? The relationship between therapist perfectionism and client outcomes in cognitive behavioural therapy. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 45, 225–237. Richardson, C. M., Trusty, W. T., & George, K. A. (2020). Trainee wellness: Self-critical perfectionism, selfcompassion, depression, and burnout among doctoral trainees in psychology. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 33, 187–198. 13 A. Pozza et al. Rozental, A. (2020). Beyond perfect? A case illustration of working with perfectionism using cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76, 2041–2054. Ruscio, A. M., Stein, D. J., Chiu, W. T., & Kessler, R. C. (2010). The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the national comorbidity survey replication. Molecular Psychiatry, 15, 53–63. Simpson, H. B., Maher, M. J., Wang, Y., Bao, Y., Foa, E. B., & Franklin, M. (2011). Patient adherence predicts outcome from cognitive behavioral therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 247–252. Stoeber, J., & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295–319. Strauss, A. Y., Huppert, J. D., Simpson, H. B., & Foa, E. B. (2018). What matters more? Common or specific factors in cognitive behavioral therapy for OCD: Therapeutic alliance and expectations as predictors of treatment outcome. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 105, 43–51. Tanzilli, A., Colli, A., Del Corno, F., & Lingiardi, V. (2016). Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Therapist Response Questionnaire. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 7, 147–158. Twohig, M. P., Abramowitz, J. S., Smith, B. M., Fabricant, L. E., Jacoby, R. J., Morrison, K. L., et al. (2018). Adding acceptance and commitment therapy to exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 108, 1–9. Voderholzer, U., Scwartz, C., Thiel, N., Kuelz, A. K., Hartmann, A., Scheidt, C. E., et al. (2014). A comparison of schemas, schema modes and childhood traumas in obsessive-compulsive disorder, chronic pain disorder and eating disorders. Psychopathology, 47, 24–31. Vogel, P. A., Hansen, B., Stiles, T. C., & Götestam, K. G. (2006). Treatment motivation, treatment expectancy, and helping alliance as predictors of outcome in cognitive behavioral treatment of OCD. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37, 247–255. Wampold, B. E. (2015). How are important the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry, 14, 270–277. Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. New York: Routledge. Wheaton, M. G., Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., & Simpson, H. B. (2016). How important is the therapeutic alliance in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder with exposure and response prevention? An empirical report. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 6, 88–93. Wittenberg, K. J., & Norcross, J. C. (2001). Practitioner perfectionism: Relationship to ambiguity tolerance and work satisfaction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 1543–1550. Zuroff, D. C., Kelly, A. C., Leybman, M. J., Blatt, S. J., & Wampold, B. E. (2010). Between-therapist and within-therapist differences in the quality of the therapeutic relationship: Effects on maladjustment and self-critical perfectionism. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 681–697. Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Authors and Affiliations Andrea Pozza1 · Silvia Casale2 · Davide Dèttore2 * Andrea Pozza andrea.pozza@unisi.it 1 Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Viale Mario Bracci 16, 53100 Siena, Italy 2 Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy 13