Investigation of Regional Fractures and Cu Mineralization Relationships in the Khezrabad and Shahr-E-Babak Area: Using Fry and Fractal Analysis

‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫‪Journal of Economic Geology‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫)‪Vol. 7, No. 2 (2015-2016‬‬ ‫ﺻﻔﺤﺎت ‪ 385‬ﺗﺎ ‪402‬‬ ‫‪ISSN 2008-7306‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‪:‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰﻫﺎي ‪ Fry‬و ‪Fractal‬‬ ‫ﻋﻠﯿﺮﺿﺎ زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي‪ ،1‬ﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﯽ‪ ،1‬ﻫﻮﺷﻨﮓ ﭘﻮرﮐﺎﺳﺐ‪ ،1‬زﻫﺮا ﺧﻮرﺳﻨﺪي *‪ 1‬و ﯾﻌﻘﻮب ﺟﻠﯿﻠﯽ‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪ (1‬ﮔﺮوه زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ‪ ،‬داﻧﺸﮑﺪه ﻋﻠﻮم زﻣﯿﻦ‪ ،‬داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺷﻬﯿﺪ ﭼﻤﺮان اﻫﻮاز ‪ ،‬اﻫﻮاز‪ ،‬اﯾﺮان‬ ‫‪ (2‬ﮔﺮوه زﻣﯿﻦ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ‪ ،‬داﻧﺸﮑﺪه ﻋﻠﻮم‪ ،‬داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺑﯿﺮﺟﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﯿﺮﺟﻨﺪ‪ ،‬اﯾﺮان‬ ‫درﯾﺎﻓﺖ‪ ،1393/10/8 :‬ﭘﺬﯾﺮش‪1394/3/30 :‬‬ ‫ﭼﮑﯿﺪه‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﮐﺎﻧﻪدار ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ واﻗﻊ در اﺳﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎي ﯾﺰد و ﮐﺮﻣﺎن‪ ،‬در ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ـ ﻧﻔﻮذي اﯾﺮان ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ﮐـﻪ داراي‬ ‫ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﯿﻞ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﯿﺎر ﻣﻄﻠﻮب ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿﺪي ﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﻮذ در واﺣﺪﻫﺎي رﺳﻮﺑﯽ ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳﻪ و ﺳﮑﺎﻧﺲ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ـ رﺳﻮﺑﯽ‬ ‫ﺑﻌﺪ از آن )اﺋﻮﺳﻦ ـ ﻣﯿﻮﺳﻦ(‪ ،‬ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي و اﺳﮑﺎرن ﺳﺎزي را در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪهاﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﺪف از اﻧﺠﺎم اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻧﻘﺶ‬ ‫ﮐﻨﺘﺮل ﮐﻨﻨﺪهﻫﺎي ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮص ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ ﺑﺰرگ و ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﺛﺎﻧﻮﯾﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ آﻧﻬﺎ در ﺟﺎيﮔﯿﺮي ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‬ ‫اﺳﺖ‪ .‬آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان روﺷﻬﺎي ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﺟﻬﺖ اﯾﺠﺎد اﯾﻦ ارﺗﺒﺎط در ﻓﻬﻢ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ و ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ ذﺧـﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﻌـﺪﻧﯽ ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﮐﺎر رﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻪﻃﻮر ﮐﻠﯽ روﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﮐﺎﻧﯿﺎﯾﯽ در ﻣﻨـﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷـﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺑـﻪﺻـﻮرت ‪ NE/SW ، NW/SE‬ﻣـﯽﺑﺎﺷـﺪ و‬ ‫ﻫﻢﺧﻮاﻧﯽ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎً ﺧﻮﺑﯽ را ﺑﺎ روﻧﺪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﻫﯿﺖ ﮐﺸﺸﯽ ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬ﻧﺸـﺎندﻫﻨـﺪه‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺒﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﺧﻮﺑﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ و روﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ و ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺑـﻪﻃـﻮر ﮐﻠـﯽ ﻧﺘـﺎﯾﺞ ﺣﺎﺻـﻠﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺟﺎيﮔﯿﺮي اﯾﻦ ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮاه ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﺑﺎ زاﯾﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎً ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‪ ،‬در ﯾﮏ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ و ﯾﺎ ﻓﻀﺎي ﮐﺸﺸـﯽ‪ 1‬ﺻـﻮرت‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﮐﻪ اﯾﻦ زونﻫﺎي ﮐﺸﺸﯽ ﻣﺎﺑﯿﻦ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي راﺳﺘﺎﻟﻐﺰ ﻓﺮﻋﯽ ﻧﺎﺷﯽ از ﯾﮏ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ دﮔﺮﺷﮑﻠﯽ اﺻﻠﯽ ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻟﺬا ﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﯾﯽ اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫زونﻫﺎي ﮐﺸﺸﯽ و ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿﺪي ﺟﺎيﮔﯿﺮ ﺷﺪه در آﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮏ اﻟﮕﻮي اﮐﺘﺸﺎﻓﯽ ﺟﻬﺖ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ‬ ‫ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮار ﮔﯿﺮد‪.‬‬ ‫واژهﻫﺎي ﮐﻠﯿﺪي‪ :‬ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‪ ،‬ﮐﻨﺘﺮل ﮐﻨﻨﺪهﻫﺎي ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري‪ ،‬آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪Fractal ،Fry‬‬ ‫ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﻪﻃﻮر ﮐﻠﯽ ﻣﺪل زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﮔﺮﻣﺎﺑﯽ را ﻣـﯽﺗـﻮان ﺑـﻪ دو‬ ‫ﺻﻮرت ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻧﻤﻮد‪ :‬ﯾﮑﯽ ﻣﺪل زاﯾﺸﯽ ﻣـﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑـﺎ ﻓﺮآﯾﻨـﺪﻫـﺎي‬ ‫زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ و زﻣﯿﻦﺷﯿﻤﯿﺎﯾﯽ و دﯾﮕﺮي ﻣﺪل زاﯾﺸﯽ در ارﺗﺒﺎط‬ ‫ﺑــﺎ ﻓﺮآﯾﻨــﺪﻫﺎي دﮔﺮﺷــﮑﻠﯽ ﭘﻮﺳــﺘﻪاي و ﻣﺤــﯿﻂ ژﺋﻮدﯾﻨــﺎﻣﯿﮑﯽ‪،‬‬ ‫)‪ .(Kesler, 1997‬ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت اﺧﯿﺮ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎدﯾﻼ و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران ‪(Padilla‬‬ ‫)‪ et al., 2001‬ﻧﺸـﺎن ﻣــﯽدﻫــﺪ ﮐـﻪ ﺗﺸــﮑﯿﻞ و ﺟــﺎيﮔﯿــﺮي‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﻧـﻪ ﺗﻨﻬـﺎ ﺗﺤـﺖ ﺗـﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻓﺮآﯾﻨـﺪﻫﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﺎﮔﻤﺎﯾﯽ و ﮔﺮﻣﺎﺑﯽ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻠﮑﻪ ﺗﮑﺘﻮﻧﯿـﮏ ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪاي‪ ،‬ﻣﺤﻠـﯽ و‬ ‫رژﯾﻢﻫﺎي ﺗﮑﺘﻮﻧﯿﮑﯽ در زﻣﺎن ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ اﯾﻦ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ ﻧﯿﺰ اﻫﻤﯿـﺖ‬ ‫ﺑﺴــﯿﺎر زﯾــﺎدي دارد‪ .‬ﺗﻮﺳــﺪال و رﯾﭽــﺎرد‬ ‫)‪ Richards, 2001‬ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي در‬ ‫ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﯾﺮ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﮔﺮﻣﺎﺑﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮز ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﯽ ﻫﻢزاد‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮده ﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮياﻧـﺪ ﮐـﻪ در اﻣﺘـﺪاد ﺳﯿﺴـﺘﻢﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﯽ اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ ﮐﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎي ﻗﺎرهاي و ﺟﺰﯾﺮهاي ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ‬ ‫ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺟﺎﯾﮕﺎه ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺟﺎيﮔﯿﺮي ﻧﻔﻮذﯾﻬﺎي ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‬ ‫و ﮐﺎﻧﺴــﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣــﺲ ﻫﻤــﺮاه آﻧﻬــﺎ‪ ،‬ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﯾﯽ ﻣﺤﻠﻬــﺎي ﺗﻤﺮﮐــﺰ‬ ‫ﺳــﯿﺎﻻت ﻣﺎﮔﻤــﺎﯾﯽ درون ﭘﻮﺳــﺘﻪ ﺑﺴــﯿﺎر ﺑــﺎ اﻫﻤﯿــﺖ اﺳــﺖ‬ ‫)‪ .(Carranza and Hale, 2002‬اﮐﺜﺮ ذﺧـﺎﯾﺮ ﻣـﺲ اﯾـﺮان ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﺧﺼﻮص ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮيﻫﺎ در زون آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ـ ﻧﻔﻮذي اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘﺮ‬ ‫‪(Tosdal and‬‬ ‫*ﻣﺴﺆول ﻣﮑﺎﺗﺒﺎت‪khorsandiz@yahoo.com :‬‬ ‫‪1. Tentional Gash‬‬ ‫‪386‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫واﻗﻊ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﮐـﻪ ارﺗﺒـﺎط زﻣـﺎﻧﯽ و ﻣﮑـﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺴـﯿﺎر زﯾـﺎدي ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ و ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿﺪي ﻣﯿﻮﺳـﻦ در‬ ‫اﯾﻦ زون دارﻧﺪ )‪ ،(Mehrabi et al., 2005‬از ﺟﻤﻠﻪ دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﮐـﻪ در اﯾـﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﻣـﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ ﻗـﺮار‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬اﮐﻨﻮن ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت و ﺑﺮرﺳﯿﻬﺎي ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﯽ ﺑﺮ روي ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ‬ ‫و ذﺧﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﺲ اﯾﺮان ﺻـﻮرت ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘـﻪ و از دﯾـﺪﮔﺎﻫﻬﺎي ﻣﺨﺘﻠـﻒ‬ ‫ﻧﻈﯿــﺮ وﯾﮋﮔﯿﻬــﺎي ﻟﯿﺘﻮﻟــﻮژي‪ ،‬زونﻫــﺎي ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎري و ﯾــﺎ ﺣﺘــﯽ‬ ‫ﺟﻐﺮاﻓﯿﺎﯾﯽ زونﺑﻨﺪي و اﯾﺎﻟﺖﺑﻨـﺪي ﺷـﺪهاﻧـﺪ‪(Khoie et al., ،‬‬ ‫)‪ .1999; Bazin and Hubner, 1969‬ﻫﻤﺎنﮔﻮﻧـﻪ ﮐـﻪ ﮔﻔﺘـﻪ‬ ‫ﺷﺪ ﻣﻤﮑﻦ اﺳﺖ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ و ﻓﺎﮐﺘﻮرﻫﺎي ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ زﻣـﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳـﯽ در‬ ‫ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ واﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﻧﻘﺶ داﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬در‬ ‫اﯾﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﯿﻖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﮐﻨﺘﺮلﮐﻨﻨﺪهﻫـﺎي ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎري در اﯾـﻦ ﺗﻮزﯾـﻊ‬ ‫ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ‪ .‬در ﺣﺎل ﺣﺎﺿﺮ از روﺷﻬﺎي‬ ‫راﯾﺎﻧﻪاي و ﻣﺪلﺳﺎزي ﺑﺮاي آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ دادهﻫـﺎي ﮔﻮﻧـﺎﮔﻮن اﺳـﺘﻔﺎده‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺷﻮد‪ .‬ﻧﻮع ﭘﺮاﮐﻨﺪﮔﯽ ﻓﻀـﺎﯾﯽ ﻧﻬﺸـﺘﻪﻫـﺎي ﮐﺎﻧﯿـﺎﯾﯽ اﻫﻤﯿـﺖ‬ ‫زﯾــﺎدي در اﮐﺘﺸــﺎف ﻧﺎﺣﯿــﻪاي و ﭘﺎﯾــﻪاي ذﺧــﺎﯾﺮ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ‬ ‫دارد)‪ .(Vearncombe and Vearncombe, 1999‬روﺷـﻬﺎي‬ ‫ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﯽ ﺟﻬﺖ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ اﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎي ﭘﺮاﮐﻨﺪﮔﯽ ﺧﺎص از ﻧﻬﺸﺘﻪﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﯿﺎﯾﯽ وﺟﻮد دارد‪ ،‬از ﺟﻤﻠﻪ روش ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪Fry‬‬ ‫ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﯽﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪاي از ﻧﻘﺎط ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ رﺧﺪادﻫﺎي ﻧﻬﺸـﺘﻪﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﯿﺎﯾﯽ ﺳﺮ و ﮐﺎر دارﯾﻢ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧـﺪ ﺑـﻪﻋﻨـﻮان ﯾـﮏ روش ﻣﮑﻤـﻞ‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺮاه ﺑﺎ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fractal‬ﺑﻪ ﮐـﺎر رود )‪.(Najafi et al., 2010‬‬ ‫در اﯾــﻦ ﭘــﮋوﻫﺶ اﻃﻼﻋــﺎت ﻧﻘﻄــﻪاي ﻣﺮﺑــﻮط ﺑــﻪ اﻧــﺪﯾﺲﻫــﺎ و‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ و ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﯿﻦ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫اﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﯽ )ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ و ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد( واﻗﻊ در زون اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬ﻣـﻮرد ﺑﺤـﺚ و ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ ﻗـﺮار‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ‬ ‫ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺘﻬﺎي آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ در اﯾﺮان ﻣﺮﮐﺰي ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎم ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ‬ ‫اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘﺮ ﯾﺎ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎنﻫﺎي ﺳﻬﻨﺪ ـ ﺑﺰﻣﺎن ﺑﻪﺻﻮرت رﺷـﺘﻪ‬ ‫ﮐﻮﻫﻬﺎﯾﯽ از آذرﺑﺎﯾﺠﺎن )ﺳﻬﻨﺪ و ﺳﺒﻼن ( ﺗﺎ ﺑﺰﻣﺎن ــ ﺗﻔﺘـﺎن در‬ ‫ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴﺘﺎن اداﻣﻪ دارد‪ ،‬اﯾﻦ ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ )اروﻣﯿـﻪــ دﺧﺘـﺮ( ﺑـﺎ ‪1700‬‬ ‫ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻃـﻮل و ﺑـﺎ ‪ 100‬ﮐﯿﻠـﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻋـﺮض ﺑـﻪ ﻣـﻮازات ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫روراﻧﺪﮔﯽ زاﮔﺮس ﮔﺴﺘﺮش دارد‪ .‬اﮐﺜـﺮ ذﺧـﺎﯾﺮ ﻣـﺲ اﯾـﺮان ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﺧﺼﻮص ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮيﻫﺎ در زون وﻟﮑﺎﻧﻮ ﭘﻠﻮﺗﻮﻧﯿـﮏ اروﻣﯿـﻪ ـ دﺧﺘـﺮ‬ ‫واﻗﻌﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ارﺗﺒﺎط زﻣـﺎﻧﯽ و ﻣﮑـﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺴـﯿﺎر ﺟـﺎﻟﺒﯽ ﺑـﺎ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ و ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿﺪي ﻣﯿﻮﺳﻦ در اﯾـﻦ زون‬ ‫دارﻧــﺪ )‪ .(Mehrabi et al., 2005‬ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿــﺖ آﺗﺸﻔﺸــﺎﻧﯽ در‬ ‫ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ـ ﻧﻔﻮذي اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘـﺮ از ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳـﻪ ﺷـﺮوع‬ ‫ﺷﺪه و در دوره اﺋﻮﺳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﯾـﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿـﺖ ﺧـﻮد رﺳـﯿﺪه اﺳـﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎظ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري در ﻣﺮز زون اﯾـﺮان ﻣﺮﮐـﺰي‬ ‫وﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪ اروﻣﯿﻪ ــ دﺧﺘـﺮ ﻗـﺮار دارد‪ .‬دوره اﺋﻮﺳـﻦ ﺑـﺎ ﺗﺸـﮑﯿﻞ‬ ‫ﮐﻨﮕﻠﻮﻣﺮاي ﮐﺮﻣﺎن ﺷﺮوع ﻣﯽﺷﻮد و ﺑﺎ ﺟـﺎيﮔﯿﺮي ﻧﻬﺸـﺘﻪﻫـﺎي‬ ‫رﺳﻮﺑﯽ ‪-‬آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ﺗﮑﻤﯿﻞ ﻣﯽﮔـﺮدد‪ .‬اﯾـﻦ واﺣـﺪ و واﺣـﺪﻫـﺎي‬ ‫زﯾﺮﯾﻦ آن ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻃﯿﻒ وﺳﯿﻌﯽ از ﺳـﻨﮕﻬﺎي آﺗﺸﻔﺸـﺎﻧﯽ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ‬ ‫آﻧــﺪزﯾﺖ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎزاﻟــﺖ‪ ،‬داﺳــﯿﺖ و ﻣــﻮاد ﭘﯿﺮوﮐﻼﺳــﺘﯿﮏ و آذرآوري‬ ‫ﭘﻮﺷــﯿﺪه ﺷــﺪه اﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﮔﺴــﺘﺮدﮔﯽ اﯾــﻦ واﺣــﺪﻫﺎي رﺳــﻮﺑﯽـــ‬ ‫آﺗﺸﻔﺸــﺎﻧﯽ در ﻧــﻮاﺣﯽ ﺟﻨــﻮﺑﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﺑﺴــﯿﺎر ﺑﯿﺸــﺘﺮ اﺳــﺖ‬ ‫)‪ .(Dehghani, 2000‬اﯾﻦ ﺳـﻨﮕﻬﺎي رﺳـﻮﺑﯽــ آﺗﺸﻔﺸـﺎﻧﯽ در‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﻨﮕﻬﺎي ﻧﻔـﻮذي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿـﺪي)اﻟﯿﮕـﻮــﻤﯿﻮﺳﻦ(‬ ‫ﻗﻄﻊ ﺷﺪهاﻧﺪ )‪ (Zarasvandi, 2004‬و ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ‬ ‫داراي ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺒﯽ از ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺖ ﺗﺎ دﯾﻮرﯾﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽرﺳﺪ ﮐﻪ در اﺑﺘﺪاي ﻓﺎز ﻣﺎﮔﻤﺎﺗﯿﺴﻢ ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿـﺖ‬ ‫آﻟﮑﺎﻟﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮص در ﻧﻮاﺣﯽ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﻔﻮذ ﮐﺮدهاﻧﺪ و ﻓـﺎز‬ ‫ﻧﻬــﺎﯾﯽ ﺳــﻨﮕﻬﺎي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿــﺪي ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﻣﺘﺸــﮑﻞ از دﯾﻮرﯾــﺖ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬اﯾﻦ ﺳﻨﮕﻬﺎي ﮔﺮاﻧﯿﺘﻮﺋﯿﺪي ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي اﺳﮑﺎرن‪-‬‬ ‫ﺳﺎزي و ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾـﯽ ﻣـﺲ از ﻧـﻮع ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي را در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺑﺎﻋـﺚ‬ ‫ﺷﺪهاﻧﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .(1‬ﻗﺴﻤﺖ اﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮه ﻣـﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ‬ ‫ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ را واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي آﻧـﺪزﯾﺘﯽ اﺋﻮﺳـﻦ ﺑـﻪ ﻫﻤـﺮاه واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي‬ ‫آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽــ رﺳـﻮﺑﯽ اﺋﻮﺳـﻦ ﭘﻮﺷـﺎﻧﺪه اﺳـﺖ‪ .‬اﻟﺒﺘـﻪ در ﻧـﻮاﺣﯽ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﮐﺰي‪ ،‬ﺷﺮق و ﺷـﻤﺎل ﻏـﺮب ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‪ ،‬ﺗـﻮدهﻫـﺎي ﮐـﻮﭼﮑﯽ از‬ ‫ﻣﺘﺎوﻟﮑﺎﻧﯿﮏﻫﺎي ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸـﻢ ﻣـﯽﺧـﻮرد‪ .‬از‬ ‫ﺳﯿﻤﺎﻫﺎي ﺑﺎرز اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ وﺟـﻮد ﺣﺠـﻢ ﻋﻈﯿﻤـﯽ از ﺳـﻨﮕﻬﺎي‬ ‫آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ اﺋﻮﺳﻦ )ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎً آﻧﺪزﯾﺖ( اﺳـﺖ ﮐـﻪ ﺑـﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﻣﯿﺰﺑـﺎن‬ ‫اﺻﻠﯽ اﮐﺜﺮ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ و دﮔﺮﺳﺎﻧﯽ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اﯾﻔﺎي ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﯽﮐﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫در اﻟﯿﮕﻮﺳﻦ ﻣﯿﺎﻧﯽ ﺗﺎ ﻣﯿﻮﺳـﻦ ﺗﺰرﯾـﻖ ﺗـﻮدهﻫـﺎي دﯾـﻮرﯾﺘﯽ ﺗـﺎ‬ ‫ﮔﺮاﻧﻮدﯾﻮرﯾﺘﯽ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ذﺧـﺎﯾﺮ ﻣـﺲ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ و‬ ‫اﮐﺜﺮ رﺧﺪادﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﺷﺪهاﻧﺪ)‪ .(Zarasvandi et al., 2005‬در‬ ‫ﺑﺴﯿﺎري از ﻧﻮاﺣﯽ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻫﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎي دﮔﺮﺳﺎﻧﯽ وﺳﯿﻌﯽ در اﻃﺮاف اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي ﮐﻪ اﻏﻠـﺐ ﺑﻪﺻـﻮرت ﺑﺎﺗﻮﻟﯿـﺖﻫـﺎي ﮐﻮﭼـﮏ و‬ ‫اﺳﺘﻮك دﯾﺪه ﻣﯽﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬در اداﻣﻪ داﯾـﮏﻫـﺎ و‬ ‫اﺳﺘﻮكﻫﺎي دﯾﻮرﯾﺘﯽ ‪-‬ﮐﻮارﺗﺰدﯾﻮرﯾﺘﯽ در ﻣﯿﻮﺳﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﯾﯽ ﺗﮑﻤﯿـﻞ‬ ‫ﮐﻨﻨﺪه ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﭘﻠﻮﺗﻮﻧﯿﺴﻢ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻮدهاﻧﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪.(2‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫‪387‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .1‬ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺳﺎده ﺷﺪه زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬ ‫‪Fig. 1. Simplified regional geologic map of The Khezr Abad‬‬ ‫روش ﮐﺎر‬ ‫آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪Fry‬‬ ‫آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬اﺑﺘﺪا در ﺳﺎل ‪ 1979‬ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﮐﺮﻧﺶ در ﺳﻨﮕﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎر ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ اﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ از آن ﺗﻮﺳﻂ وﯾﺮﻧﮑﻮﻣﺐ و وﯾﺮﻧﮑﻮﻣﺐ‬ ‫)‪ (Vearncombe and Vearncombe, 1999‬ﺑﺮاي ﺗﺤﻠﯿـﻞ‬ ‫ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻮرد اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪ .‬اﯾﻦ‬ ‫آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ﯾﮏ روش ﻫﻨﺪﺳﯽ ﺧﻮد اﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﯽ ﺑﺮاي دادهﻫﺎي ﻧﻘﻄـﻪاي‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎرﺑﺮد اﯾﻦ روش ﻣﯽ ﺗﻮان ﺑﺮاي ‪ n‬ﻧﻘﻄـﻪ‪ ،‬ﮐـﻪ ﻫـﺮ‬ ‫ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﯾﮏ ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎر و ﮐـﺎنﺗـﻮده ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫))‪ (n(n-1‬راﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺮاي ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ و اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎي ﻣﻌـﺪﻧﯽ‬ ‫ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﯾﺪ‪ .‬اﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻬﺎي اﯾﻦ ﻧﻘﺎط ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﯾﮏ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﺮﮐﺰي و‬ ‫ﺧﻄﻮط ﻣﺮﺟﻊ‪ 1‬ﺻﻮرت ﻣﯽﮔﯿﺮد ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان اﻟﮕﻮ ﯾﺎ ﻃـﺮح ‪Fry‬‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮوف اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ در اﯾﺮان ﻧﯿﺰ از اﯾﻦ روش ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ ﺑﺮاي‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ ﺗﻮزﯾﻌﻬـﺎي ﻣﮑـﺎﻧﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﮐﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ‬ ‫ﯾﻌﻘﻮبﭘــﻮر و ﺣﺴــﻦﻧﮋاد ‪(Yaghoubpour and Hassan‬‬ ‫)‪ ،Nezhad., 2006‬ﺳــﺮب و روي‪ ،‬ﺣﺴــﻦﻧﮋاد و ﻫﻤﮑــﺎران‬ ‫)‪ ،(Hassan Nezhad et al., 2001‬آﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻧﺠﻔـﯽ و ﻫﻤﮑـﺎران‬ ‫)‪ (Najafi et Al., 2010‬و ﻣـــﺲ‪ ،‬ﺗﻨﻬـــﺎﯾﯽ و ﻫﻤﮑـــﺎران‬ ‫)‪ (Tanhaei et al., 2010‬اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫دو ﺻﻮرت دﺳﺘﯽ و راﯾﺎﻧﻪاي اﻧﺠﺎم ﻣﯽﺷﻮد ﮐﻪ در ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ‬ ‫اﯾﻦ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺮماﻓـﺰار ‪ Dot Proc‬ﺻـﻮرت ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘـﻪ اﺳـﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﭘﺲ از ﺟﻤﻊآوري اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در دو‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﺧﻀــﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷــﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‪ ،‬ﻣﺨﺘﺼــﺎت ‪ x‬و ‪ y‬اﻧــﺪﯾﺲﻫــﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮد ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪام از ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣـﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﺑـﻪﻃﻮر ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧـﻪ ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﺮماﻓﺰار ﻣﻌﺮﻓـﯽ و ﺑﻌـﺪ از وارد ﻧﻤـﻮدن ﻣﺨﺘﺼـﺎت اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ و‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﺴــﺎرﻫﺎ‪ ،‬اﻟﮕــﻮي ‪ Fry‬دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﯾﺎدﺷــﺪه ﺑﻪدﺳــﺖ آﻣــﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺎنﻃﻮر ﮐﻪ ذﮐﺮ ﺷﺪ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﯾﮑﺪﯾﮕﺮﻧـﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﺒﻨﺎي روش ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ در ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎل ﻣﺤﺎﺳـﺒﻪ اﺑﻌـﺎد ﻓﺮﮐﺘـﺎﻟﯽ ﺑـﺮاي‬ ‫‪1. Reference Lines‬‬ ‫‪388‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻫﻨﺪﺳﯽ و اﻗﻠﯿﺪﺳﯽ اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑـﺮ اﺳـﺎس ﻣﻔـﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﻫﻨﺪﺳـﯽ‬ ‫اﻗﻠﯿﺪﺳﯽ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻋﻨﺎﺻـﺮ ﻫﻨﺪﺳـﯽ اﻋـﺪاد ﺻـﺤﯿﺢ ‪3‬و‪ 0،1،2‬ﺑـﺮاي‬ ‫ﻧﻘﻄﻪ‪ ،‬ﺧﻂ‪ ،‬ﺻﻔﺤﻪ و ﺣﺠﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪام از اﯾﻨﻬـﺎ ﺑﯿـﺎﻧﮕﺮ‬ ‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻫﻨﺪﺳﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﺤـﺪود ﻣـﯽﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ‪ .‬در ﻃﺒﯿﻌـﺖ ﻣـﺎدي ﻫﻤـﻪ‬ ‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺤﺪود ﺑﻮده و ﻋﻤﻼً ﭘﺎره ﺧﻂ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎره ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﯾﺎ ﭘـﺎره ﺣﺠـﻢ‬ ‫ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻫﻨﺪﺳﯽ اﻗﻠﯿﺪﺳـﯽ ﺑـﻪﺧﻮﺑﯽ ﻧﻤـﯽﺗﻮاﻧﻨـﺪ‬ ‫ﺑﯿﺎﻧﮕﺮ وﯾﮋﮔﯽ ﭘﺪﯾﺪهﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ و ﯾﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ آﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﯾﮑﺪﯾﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫وﻟﯽ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﻨﺪ اﻋﺪاد اﻋﺸـﺎري ﺑـﻮده‪ ،‬ﺑـﺪﯾﻦﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﺪودﯾﺘﯽ در اﻧﺪازهﮔﯿﺮي ﻫﯿﭻﮐﺪام از ﻓﺮآﯾﻨـﺪﻫﺎي ﻃﺒﯿﻌـﯽ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫اﯾﻦ روش وﺟﻮد ﻧﺪارد‪ .‬ﯾﮑﯽ از روﺷﻬﺎي ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪاي‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ آﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ‪ .‬اﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎي زﻣـﯿﻦﺳـﺎﺧﺘﯽ ﺑـﺮاي‬ ‫ﺗﻮزﯾﻊ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮرﮐﺖ )‪ (Turcotte, 1992‬اراﺋﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬در اﯾﻦ اﻟﮕﻮ ﺑﺎ اﺳـﺘﻔﺎده از روش ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺷـﻤﺎر‪ 1‬اﺑﻌـﺎد‬ ‫ﻓﺮﮐﺘــﺎﻟﯽ را در ﺟﻬــﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﯿــﻪ ﺗﻮزﯾــﻊ ﺻــﻔﺤﺎت ﺷﮑﺴــﺘﮕﯽ در‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﮔﺴﻠﯿﺪه ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﻣـﯽﮐﻨﻨـﺪ‪ .‬اﺻـﻮل اﯾـﻦ روش ﺗﺮﺳـﯿﻢ‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻮدارﻫــﺎي ﻟﮕــﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ ـ ﻟﮕــﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ اﺳــﺖ ﮐــﻪ در آن ﺗﻌــﺪاد‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎي ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ‪ Nr‬ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺐ ﻃﻮل ﺷﺒﮑﻪ اﻧـﺪازهﮔﯿـﺮي ‪r‬‬ ‫ﯾﺎ ﻋﮑﺲ آن ‪ 1/r‬رﺳﻢ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬در اﯾـﻦ ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ ﻫﺮﮐـﺪام از‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ اﺑﺘﺪا ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢﺑﻨﺪي ﺷﺪه و ﺳـﭙﺲ ﻫـﺮ ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ‬ ‫ﺑﻪﻃﻮر ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨﺪي )ﺷﮑﻠﻬﺎي ‪ 7‬و ‪ ،(9‬ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻟﮕـﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ‬ ‫آن ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ و ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪام از ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﻪدﺳﺖ آﻣﺪ‪ .‬ﺑـﺮاي‬ ‫ﺑﻪدﺳﺖ آوردن ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ راﺑﻄﻪ زﯾﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﯾﻒ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪:‬‬ ‫)‪Log(Nr) = a + K log (١/r‬‬ ‫ﮐﻪ ﺿﺮﯾﺐ ﺧﻂ ‪ K‬در ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺎن ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ اﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .2‬ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺳﺎده ﺷﺪه زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Fig. 2. Simplified regional geologic map of The Shahr-e-Babak‬‬ ‫‪1. Box-Counting‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ‪ Fry‬در دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺑﻪﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ داراي ‪ 37‬و ‪ 41‬اﻧـﺪﯾﺲ‬ ‫و ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎر ﻣﺲ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ )ﺟـﺪوﻟﻬﺎي ‪ 1‬و ‪ ،(2‬در ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ‬ ‫اﯾﻦ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺮماﻓـﺰار ‪ Dot Proc‬ﺻـﻮرت ﭘﺬﯾﺮﻓﺘـﻪ اﺳـﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﭘﺲ از ﺟﻤﻊآوري اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در دو‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷـﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‪ ،‬ﻣﺨﺘﺼـﺎت ‪ x‬و ‪ y‬اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮد ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪام از ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻧـﺮماﻓـﺰار‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﯽ و ﺑﻌﺪ از وارد ﻧﻤﻮدن ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺎت اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫‪389‬‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ A - 3‬و ‪ B - 3‬اﻟﮕﻮي ‪ Fry‬دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑـﻪدﺳـﺖ‬ ‫آﻣﺪ و ﺑـﻪ ازاي ‪ 37‬و ‪ 41‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎر و اﻧـﺪﯾﺲ ﻣﻌـﺪﻧﯽ در ﻣﻨـﺎﻃﻖ‬ ‫ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿـﺐ ‪ 1332‬و ‪ 1640‬راﺑﻄـﻪ ﻣﮑـﺎﻧﯽ‬ ‫ﺑﻪﺻﻮرت ﺗﺠﻤﻌﯽ از ﻧﻘﺎط ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﻧﺮماﻓﺰار دﯾﺎﮔﺮام ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﯿﺮي اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮد در دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪي ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﻧﯿـﺰ ﺗﺮﺳـﯿﻢ ﺷـﺪ‬ ‫ﮐﻪ روﻧﺪ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﯿﺮﯾﻬﺎي اﺻﻠﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ و اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ را در‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﯾﺎدﺷﺪه ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ A - 3‬و ‪.(B - 3‬‬ ‫ﺟﺪول ‪ .1‬ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬ ‫‪Table 1. Latitude and Longitude of Cu index in the Khezrabad area‬‬ ‫‪Name‬‬ ‫‪Latitude and‬‬ ‫‪Longitude‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪Y‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 45َ 53‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 36َ 50‬‬ ‫‪Mansurabad‬‬ ‫‪Latitude and Longitude‬‬ ‫‪y‬‬ ‫ً‪31O 38َ 24‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫ً‪53O 50َ 59‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪Name‬‬ ‫‪Aliabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 43َ 18‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 45َ 9‬‬ ‫‪Mazraemirha‬‬ ‫ً‪31 43َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53 48َ 6‬‬ ‫‪Badamake Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 31َ 59‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 55َ 00‬‬ ‫‪Dareh zereshk‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 43َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 47َ 34‬‬ ‫‪Badamake Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 52َ 00‬‬ ‫‪Sadre nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 34َ 22‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 48َ 3‬‬ ‫‪Bidestane Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 55َ 56‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 44َ 35‬‬ ‫‪Mohamad panahkuh‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 52َ 1‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 41َ 3‬‬ ‫‪Cheshme Zardestan‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 45َ 47‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 54َ 7‬‬ ‫‪Mohamad panahkuh‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 29َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 29َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Maadane Kood2‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 46َ 20‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 54َ 7‬‬ ‫‪Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 40َ 23‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 44‬‬ ‫‪Dreh Adarbalandan‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 44َ 6‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 39َ 32‬‬ ‫‪Sadrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 37َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 45‬‬ ‫‪Dreh Adarbalandan‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44 3‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 44َ 6‬‬ ‫‪Sangdun Galuyek‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 33َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 50َ 41‬‬ ‫‪Dreh Zereshk‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 52َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 42َ 30‬‬ ‫‪Maadan Khud‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 52َ 42‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 56َ 41‬‬ ‫‪Gurekhare Khezrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 36َ 25‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 54َ 34‬‬ ‫‪North of Bidadkuh‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 52َ 59‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 42َ 33‬‬ ‫‪Khood‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 1‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 48َ 6‬‬ ‫‪North of gosale sartab‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 43َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 47َ 34‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 1‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 44‬‬ ‫‪Adarbalandan‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 41َ 16‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 22‬‬ ‫‪Kuhe maadanune‬‬ ‫‪Badamake nasrabad‬‬ ‫‪Halihuhe Adarbalandan‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 40َ 23‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 44‬‬ ‫‪Adarbalandan‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 37‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 50َ 53‬‬ ‫‪South of Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 1‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 48َ 6‬‬ ‫‪Sartab‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 55َ 58‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 55َ 53‬‬ ‫‪South of panahkuh‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 51َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Sadre Nasrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 51َ 57‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 57َ 00‬‬ ‫‪Khezrabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 56َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Mazrae mirha‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 53َ 17‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 53َ 57‬‬ ‫‪Khiyarabad‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 43َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 47َ 34‬‬ ‫‪Maadanoon‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 56َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 43َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 44َ 37‬‬ ‫ً‪53o 50َ 53‬‬ ‫‪Milsefid Mohammad‬‬ ‫‪Abad‬‬ ‫‪Nasrabad‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫‪3 90‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫ﺟﺪول ‪ .2‬ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Table 2. Latitude and Longitude of Cu index in the Shahr-e-Babak area‬‬ ‫‪Name‬‬ ‫‪Latitude and Longitude‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪y‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 24َ 37‬‬ ‫ً‪31o 2َ 24‬‬ ‫‪Sw of golab‬‬ ‫‪Latitude and Longitude‬‬ ‫‪x‬‬ ‫‪y‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 7َ 30‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 28َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Bidu‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 21َ 38‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 24َ 55‬‬ ‫‪Hossein abad‬‬ ‫ً‪30 22َ 58‬‬ ‫ً‪55 11َ 24‬‬ ‫‪Kuh-e-Mozahem‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 17َ 13‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 24َ 34‬‬ ‫‪Sw of golab‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 25َ 32‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 10َ 27‬‬ ‫‪Meiduk‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 17َ 23‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 24َ 3‬‬ ‫‪Darkhooni‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 27َ 4‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 17‬‬ ‫‪Sara‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 12َ 45‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 26َ 10‬‬ ‫‪Golab‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 16َ 35‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 5َ 60‬‬ ‫‪E of Medvar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 17َ 23‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 24َ 3‬‬ ‫‪Kuh-e-medvar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 23َ 51‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 0َ 48‬‬ ‫‪Kahtookara‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 3‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 29َ 36‬‬ ‫‪NE of Hamdin‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 10َ 27‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 4َ 1‬‬ ‫‪W of Shahr-e-Babak‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 20َ 3‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 29َ 23‬‬ ‫‪Goori‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 23َ 2‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 2َ 29‬‬ ‫‪Kang‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 16َ 8‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 28َ 46‬‬ ‫‪Badamestan‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 26َ 56‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 3َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Dareh tangale‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 18َ 28‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 17َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Abdar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 48‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 10َ 0‬‬ ‫‪S of Meiduk silica vein‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 30‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 9َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Chahmesi‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 15َ 10‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 6َ 41‬‬ ‫‪Kuh-e-golab‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 13َ 23‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 16َ 16‬‬ ‫‪Abdar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 22َ 15‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 6َ 41‬‬ ‫‪Hernashk‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 9َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Lachah2‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 3‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 7َ 35‬‬ ‫‪South of meiduk‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 21َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 26َ 60‬‬ ‫‪Kalderaye abdar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 26َ 12‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 7َ 35‬‬ ‫‪Darbidueh‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 25َ 42‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 15‬‬ ‫‪NW of meiduk‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 27َ 46‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 6َ 27‬‬ ‫‪Darbidueh‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 29َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 3َ 10‬‬ ‫‪Godkalgovari‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 40‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 7َ 23‬‬ ‫‪E of meiduk station‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 29َ 45‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 20َ 11‬‬ ‫‪Reshkan‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 24َ 51‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 54‬‬ ‫‪W of meiduk station‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 18َ 12‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 18َ 34‬‬ ‫‪Abdar silica vein‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 22َ 33‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 54‬‬ ‫‪NW of Bandovan‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 18َ 38‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 18َ 56‬‬ ‫‪Abdar‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 22َ 53‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 24‬‬ ‫‪N of Kamquieh‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 26َ 36‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 10َ 18‬‬ ‫‪Latala‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 23َ 60‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 49‬‬ ‫‪SE of meiduk‬‬ ‫ً‪30o 23َ 54‬‬ ‫ً‪55o 8َ 12‬‬ ‫‪South of meiduk‬‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ در دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺑﺮاي اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ و ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ و ﺗﻌﯿـﯿﻦ ارﺗﺒـﺎط آﻧﻬـﺎ‪ ،‬از‬ ‫ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻮارهاي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦﮐﻪ اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ روي ﺗﺼـﻮﯾﺮ ﻣـﺎﻫﻮارهاي ﺑﻪﺻـﻮرت ﺧﻄـﯽ ﺧـﻮد را‬ ‫ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ دﯾﮕﺮ ﻋﻮارض ﺧﻄﯽ ﻧﻈﯿـﺮ ﺧﻄـﻮط آﺑﺮاﻫـﻪ و‬ ‫ﺟﺎدهﻫـﺎ ﻣـﯽﺗﻮاﻧﻨـﺪ اﺷـﺘﺒﺎه ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻪ ﺷـﻮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻨـﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﺑـﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮر‬ ‫ﺗﺸــﺨﯿﺺ ﮔﺴــﻠﻬﺎ و ﺷﮑﺴــﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ﺗﮑﺘــﻮﻧﯿﮑﯽ ﺑــﺮ روي ﺗﺼــﻮﯾﺮ‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻫﻮارهاي از ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺐ ﺑﺎﻧﺪي ‪ 6:4:2‬و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺗﺼﺎوﯾﺮ ‪Google‬‬ ‫‪earth‬ﮐﻤﮏ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ و ﺑﻪﺻﻮرت ﭼﺸﻤﯽ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻋﻼﯾـﻢ‬ ‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪o‬‬ ‫‪Name‬‬ ‫و ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ اﯾـﻦ ﻗﺒﯿـﻞ ﻋـﻮارض از ﺧـﻮد ﻧﺸـﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﻨـﺪ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ )ﺷﮑﻠﻬﺎي ‪ 4‬و ‪.(5‬‬ ‫ﭘﺲ از اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ و ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ ﺑـﺎ اﺳـﺘﻔﺎده از روﺷـﻬﺎي‬ ‫ﻧــﺎمﺑــﺮده و اﻧﻄﺒــﺎق آﻧﻬــﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﺷﮑﺴــﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ﻣﻮﺟــﻮد در ورﻗــﻪ‬ ‫‪ 1:100000‬ﻫﺮ دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﻣـﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ‪ ،‬در ﻧﻬﺎﯾـﺖ ﻧﻘﺸـﻪ و‬ ‫ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ ﻗﺮارﮔﯿﺮي ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ آﻧﻬـﺎ ﺗﻬﯿـﻪ و ﻧﻤـﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳـﺮﺧﯽ‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ روﻧﺪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ و ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ در ﻣﺤـﯿﻂ ‪ Arc Gis‬ﺗﻬﯿـﻪ‬ ‫ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ A - 6‬و ‪.(B - 6‬‬ ‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻓﻮق اﻟﺬﮐﺮ اﺑﺘﺪا ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮد در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ﺑﻪ ‪ 4‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﻪ ﻃـﻮل ‪ 30‬ﮐﯿﻠـﻮﻣﺘﺮ‬ ‫ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨﺪي ﺷﺪ و ﺳﭙﺲ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣـﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ ﻗـﺮار‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫ﮔﺮﻓﺖ و ﺑﺮاي ﻫﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﯾﮏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺷـﺪ‪ .‬ﺑـﻪ اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﻫﺮﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮل ‪ 30‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺑـﻪ ‪ 4‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﺎ ﻃـﻮل ‪15‬‬ ‫ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ و ﺑﻪﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺻﻮرت ﺑﻪ ‪16‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﺎ ﻃـﻮل‬ ‫ﺿﻠﻊ ‪7/5‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ‪ 64 ،‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮل ﺿـﻠﻊ ‪ 3/75‬ﮐﯿﻠـﻮﻣﺘﺮ‪256 ،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃـﻮل ﺿـﻠﻊ ‪ 1024 ،1/87‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﺎ ﻃـﻮل ﺿـﻠﻊ ‪0/93‬‬ ‫‪3 91‬‬ ‫ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ و ‪ 4096‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ‪ 0/46‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨـﺪي‬ ‫ﺷﺪ‪ .‬در ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ 7‬ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨﺪي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ﻧﺸـﺎن داده‬ ‫ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎي ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ﺷﻤﺎرش )ﺟـﺪول ‪ (3‬و‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻟﮕﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ و ﺑﻌـﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘـﺎﻟﯽ ﺟﻬـﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﻮاﺣﯽ ﻧﺎمﺑﺮده ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ C ،B ،A - 8‬و ‪.(D‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .3‬ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آﻧﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ﻧﻤﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ ﺑﺮاي روﻧﺪﻫﺎي ﺟﻬﺖﮔﯿﺮي اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ‪ :A .‬ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‪ :B ،‬ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Fig. 3. Fry analysis and Rose diagram for trends of the Cu index and deposits A: Khezrabad, B: Shahr-E-Babak‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ رﺳﻢ ﻧﻤـﻮدار ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃـﻪ و اﺑﻌـﺎد ﻓﺮﮐﺘـﺎﻟﯽ ﺣﺎﺻـﻠﻪ در‬ ‫)ﺷـﮑﻞ ‪ C ،B ،A - 8‬و ‪ ،(D‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ‪ b‬واﻗـﻊ در ﻗﺴـﻤﺖ ﺟﻨـﻮب‬ ‫ﺷﺮق ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ را دارا ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫‪Da =1/542‬‬ ‫‪Db =1/7002‬‬ ‫‪Dc =1/5762‬‬ ‫‪Dd =1/6849‬‬ ‫در ﻣﺮﺣﻠــﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺟﻬــﺖ ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘــﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﺤــﺪوده‬ ‫‪ 1:100000‬ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‪ ،‬ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ﺑﻪ ‪ 8‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑـﺎ ﺿـﻠﻊ‬ ‫‪16‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻘﺴﯿﻢﺑﻨﺪي ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ‪ ،‬ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺮاي ﻫﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧـﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺪﯾﻦﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﻫـﺮ ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﺎ ﻃـﻮل ‪16‬‬ ‫ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ‪ 4‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ‪ 8‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ و ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﯿـﺐ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ‪ 16‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ‪ 4‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ‪ 64 ،‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃـﻮل ﺿـﻠﻊ ‪2‬‬ ‫ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ‪256 ،‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ‪ 1‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ و ‪ 1024‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ‪ 0/5‬ﮐﯿﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨـﺪي ﺷـﺪ‪ .‬در ﺷـﮑﻞ ‪ 9‬ﺗﺮﺗﯿـﺐ‬ ‫‪3 92‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫ﺷﺒﮑﻪﺑﻨﺪي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﻧﺸﺎن داده ﺷﺪه اﺳـﺖ‪ .‬ﭘـﺲ از آن‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎي ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ﺷﻤﺎرش )ﺟـﺪول ‪ ،(4‬ﻧﻤـﻮدار ﻟﮕـﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﯿﻢ و ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻧـﻮاﺣﯽ ﯾﺎدﺷـﺪه ﺑﻪدﺳـﺖ‬ ‫آﻣﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ G ،F ،E ،D ،C ،B ،A- 10‬و ‪.(H‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .4‬ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺐ ﺑﺎﻧﺪ )‪ (6:4:2‬و ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي اﺻﻠﯽ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬ ‫‪Fig. 4. Band composite image (6:4:2) and the main fault location in the Khezrabad area‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .5‬ﺗﺼﻮﯾﺮ ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺐ ﺑﺎﻧﺪ )‪ (6:4:2‬و ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿﺖ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي اﺻﻠﯽ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Fig. 5. Band composite image (6:4:2) and the main fault location in the Shahr-E-Babak area‬‬ ‫‪3 93‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ 3 94 ‫ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬:B ،‫ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬:A .‫ﮔﺴﻞ‬/‫ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ و ﻧﻤﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ روﻧﺪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ‬.6 ‫ﺷﮑﻞ‬ Fig. 6. Map and Rose diagram of trends of fault/fracture. A: Khezrabad, B: Shahr-E-Babak ‫ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬،a,b,c,d ‫ﻣﺮﺑﻊ‬4 ‫( ﺑﺮاي‬N)‫( و ﺗﻌﺪاد ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ‬r)‫ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻣﺮﺑﻊ‬.3 ‫ﺟﺪول‬ Table 3. Square dimension (r) and The number of square containing faults (N) for 4 square: a,b,c,d, Khezr Abad area r(km) Na Nb Nc Nd r1 = 30 1 1 1 1 r2 = 14 2 4 4 3 r 3 =7 6 15 12 11 r4 = 3.5 21 47 50 36 r5 = 1.75 58 132 99 110 r6 = 0.875 161 337 152 292 r7 = 0.467 380 866 612 693 ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫‪3 95‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .7‬اﺟﺮاي روش ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺷﻤﺎر ﺑﺮ روي ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‪ ،‬ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ‬ ‫‪Fig. 7. Stepwise presentation of box-counting method for measuring the fault fractal dimention D, in the Khezrabad‬‬ ‫‪area‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫‪3 96‬‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .8‬ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻟﮕﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ ﺗﻌﺪاد ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺣﺎوي ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ در ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻋﮑﺲ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎ در ﻣﺮﺑﻊﻫﺎي ‪ .a,b,c,d‬ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬ ‫‪Fig. 8. Logarithmic plot for number of cells filled by fault N(r) versuse inverse of square,s length side in squares a,b,c,d‬‬ ‫‪of Khezr Abad area‬‬ ‫ﺟﺪول ‪ .4‬اﺑﻌﺎد ﻣﺮﺑﻊ)‪ (r‬و ﺗﻌﺪاد ﻣﺮﺑﻊﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺣﺎوي ﮔﺴﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ)‪ (N‬ﺑﺮاي ‪ 8‬ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ‪ .a-h‬ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Table 4. Square dimension (r) and the number of square containing faults (N) for 8 square: a-h. Shahr-e-Babak‬‬ ‫‪Nh‬‬ ‫‪Ng‬‬ ‫‪Nf‬‬ ‫‪Ne‬‬ ‫‪Nd‬‬ ‫‪Nc‬‬ ‫‪Nb‬‬ ‫‪Na‬‬ ‫)‪r(km‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬ ‫‪53‬‬ ‫‪155‬‬ ‫‪356‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪56‬‬ ‫‪141‬‬ ‫‪276‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪55‬‬ ‫‪174‬‬ ‫‪387‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬ ‫‪42‬‬ ‫‪110‬‬ ‫‪264‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪23‬‬ ‫‪57‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪29‬‬ ‫‪62‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬ ‫‪9‬‬ ‫‪18‬‬ ‫‪37‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬ ‫‪21‬‬ ‫‪37‬‬ ‫‪r1 = 16‬‬ ‫‪r 2 =8‬‬ ‫‪r3 = 4‬‬ ‫‪r4 = 2‬‬ ‫‪r5 = 1‬‬ ‫‪r6 =0.5‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ رﺳﻢ ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ و اﺑﻌﺎد ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﻪدﺳـﺖ آﻣـﺪه‬ ‫در )ﺷـﮑﻞ ‪ G ،F ،E ،D ،C ،B ،A - 10‬و ‪ ،(H‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻊ ‪ f‬واﻗـﻊ در‬ ‫ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺷﻤﺎل ﻏﺮب ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ را داراﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫‪Df =1/748‬‬ ‫‪Da =1/06‬‬ ‫‪Dg =1/6533‬‬ ‫‪Db =1/039‬‬ ‫‪Dh =1/721‬‬ ‫‪Dc =1/762‬‬ ‫‪Dd =1/4095‬‬ ‫‪De =1/6105‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫‪3 97‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .9‬اﺟﺮاي روش ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺷﻤﺎر ﺑﺮ روي ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ‬ ‫‪Fig 9. Stepwise presentation of box-counting method for measuring the fault fractal dimention D, in the Shahr-E-Babak‬‬ ‫‪area‬‬ ‫‪3 98‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫ﺷﮑﻞ‪ :10‬ﻧﻤﻮدار ﻟﮕﺎرﯾﺘﻤﯽ ﺗﻌﺪاد ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺣﺎوي ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ در ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻋﮑﺲ ﻃﻮل ﺿﻠﻊ ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎ در ﻣﺮﺑﻌﻬﺎي ‪ a‬ﺗﺎ ‪ .h‬ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫‪Fig 10. Logarithmic plot for number of cells filled by fault N(r) versuse inverse of square,s length side in squares a-h.‬‬ ‫‪Shahr-e-Babak area‬‬ ‫ﺟﻠﺪ ‪ ،7‬ﺷﻤﺎره ‪) 2‬ﺳﺎل ‪(1394‬‬ ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ‪.....‬‬ ‫ﺑﺤﺚ‬ ‫ﺑــﺮ اﺳــﺎس‪ ،‬دﻫﻘــﺎﻧﯽ )‪ (Dehghani, 2000‬اﻟﮕــﻮي ﮔﺴــﻠﻬﺎ ‪/‬‬ ‫ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ‪ ،‬زونﻫﺎي ﺑﺮﺷﯽ و ﺗﻨﺸﻬﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻋـﻮاﻣﻠﯽ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ‬ ‫ﮐـﻪ ﺑﺎﻋـﺚ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﮐـﺰ ﺷـﺪن ﻣﺎﮔﻤـﺎ و ﯾـﺎ ﺣﺮﮐـﺖ آن در ﻧـﻮاﺣﯽ‬ ‫ﮐﻢﻋﻤﻖ ﭘﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﯽﺷﻮﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي را ﻣﯽﺗـﻮان‬ ‫ﻣﺤﺼــﻮل ﺳــﺮد ﺷــﺪن ﺳﯿﺴــﺘﻢﻫــﺎي ﻫﯿــﺪروﺗﺮﻣﺎﻟﯽ ﻫﻤــﺮاه ﺑــﺎ‬ ‫ﻧﻔﻮذﯾﻬــﺎي ﮐــﻢﻋﻤــﻖ ﭘــﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﺟــﺎيﮔﯿــﺮ ﺷــﺪه در ﮐﻤﺎﻧﻬــﺎي‬ ‫ﻣﺎﮔﻤﺎﯾﯽ داﻧﺴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻟﺬا ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻫﻨﺪﺳﻪ و ﺳﺎزوﮐﺎر ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‪ ،‬ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﻣﮑﺎﻧﻬـﺎي ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺐ‬ ‫ﺑﺮاي ﺟﺎيﮔﯿﺮي ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﺑﺴـﯿﺎر ﺑـﺎ اﻫﻤﯿـﺖ‬ ‫ﺗﻠﻘﯽ ﺷـﻮد )‪ .(Zarasvandi, 2004‬در اﯾـﻦ راﺳـﺘﺎ‪ ،‬ﮐـﺎراﻧﺰا و‬ ‫ﻫــﺎل )‪ (Carranza and Hale, 2002‬زونﻫــﺎي ﺑﺮﺷــﯽ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺣﻮﺿــﻪﻫــﺎي ‪ pull a part‬و اﻧﻘﻄــﺎع در اﻣﺘــﺪاد ﮔﺴــﻠﻬﺎي‬ ‫اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ را ﻣﮑﺎﻧﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺴـﯿﺎر ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺐ ﺟﻬـﺖ ﻧﻔـﻮذ ﺗـﻮدهﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﺗﻔﺮﯾﻖ ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي و ﺗﺸـﮑﯿﻞ ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‬ ‫ﻣﯽداﻧﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺑﯿﻦ ﻧﻘﺎط ﻣﻌﺪﻧﯽ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻـﺮ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎري‬ ‫ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪه‪ ،‬ﮐﻤــﮏ ﺑﺴــﯿﺎر ﺷــﺎﯾﺎﻧﯽ ﺟﻬــﺖ ﺗﻌﯿــﯿﻦ ﻧﻘــﺎط‬ ‫اﻣﯿﺪﺑﺨﺶ در راﺳﺘﺎي ﮐﺎرﻫﺎي اﮐﺘﺸﺎﻓﯽ ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﻧﻤﻮد‪ .‬ﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﯾﯽ‬ ‫اﻟﮕــﻮي ﭘﺮاﮐﻨــﺪﮔﯽ ﻧﻬﺸــﺘﻪﻫــﺎي ﮐﺎﻧﯿــﺎﯾﯽ اﻫﻤﯿــﺖ زﯾــﺎدي در‬ ‫اﮐﺘﺸـﺎﻓﺎت ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪاي و ارزﯾـﺎﺑﯽ ذﺧـﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﻌـﺪﻧﯽ ﻧﺎﺷـﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ دارد‬ ‫)‪ .(Vearncombe and Vearncombe, 1999‬ﺑـﺪﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻈـﻮر‬ ‫دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺧﻀــﺮآﺑﺎد و ﺷـﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﻣــﻮرد ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ ﻗــﺮار ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻗـﺮارﮔﯿـﺮي آﻧﻬـﺎ در ﮐﻤﺮﺑﻨـﺪ‬ ‫آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ـ ﻧﻔﻮذي اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﯽ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﯿﻞ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻻ ﺟﻬﺖ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﻣـﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺑـﻮدهاﻧـﺪ‪ .‬از اﯾـﻦ رو اﻃﻼﻋـﺎت‬ ‫ﻧﻘﻄﻪاي ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ و ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﯿﻦ‬ ‫ﺧﻄﻮارهﻫـﺎي ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در ﻣﻘﯿـﺎس‪ 1:100000‬دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﻣـﻮرد‬ ‫ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ )ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ و ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد( ﻣﺸﺨﺺ و ﻣﻮرد ﺑﺤﺚ و ﺑﺮرﺳـﯽ‬ ‫ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ‪ .‬آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬و ‪ Fractal‬ﺑـﻪﻋﻨـﻮان دو روش ﻣﮑﻤـﻞ‬ ‫ﺟﻬــﺖ ﺗﻌﯿــﯿﻦ ارﺗﺒــﺎط و ﺗﻔﺴــﯿﺮ ﺷﮑﺴــﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ ﺑــﺎ اﻧــﺪﯾﺲﻫــﺎ و‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﺑﻪ رﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد از ﺳﻤﺖ ﻏـﺮب‬ ‫ﺑﻪوﺳﯿﻠﻪ ﮔﺴﻞ دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ـ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ و زون اروﻣﯿﻪ ـ دﺧﺘﺮ و از ﺳـﻤﺖ‬ ‫ﺷﺮق ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻬﺎي ﭘﺎﻟﺌﻮزوﯾﯿﮏ ـ ژوراﺳﯿﮏ و زون اﯾﺮان ﻣﺮﮐـﺰي‬ ‫ﻣﺤﺪود ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷـﺪ‪ .‬ﺑـﻪﻃـﻮر ﮐﻠـﯽ ﭘـﻨﺞ دﺳـﺘﻪ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯽ درون‬ ‫زونﻫﺎي ﺑﺮﺷﯽ ﺳﺎده ﻣـﯽﺗﻮاﻧﻨـﺪ ﺗﺸـﮑﯿﻞ ﺷـﻮﻧﺪ‪ (1 :‬ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي‬ ‫اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ ﮐﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﺮﮐﺘﯽ ﺷﺒﯿﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ دارﻧﺪ و ﺑـﻪ ‪R‬‬ ‫ﻣﻌﺮوف ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ (2 ،‬ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﺰدوج ﮐﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﺮﮐﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ‬ ‫‪3 99‬‬ ‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﮔﺴﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ دارﻧﺪ و ﺑﻪ ΄‪ R‬ﻣﻌـﺮوف اﺳـﺖ‪ (3 ،‬ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي‬ ‫اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﯾﻪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮش زاوﯾﻪ ﯾﮑﺴﺎن و ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺟﻬـﺖ‬ ‫‪ R‬ﻣﯽﺳﺎزﻧﺪ و ﺑـﻪ ‪ P‬ﻣﻌﺮوﻓﻨـﺪ‪ (4 ،‬ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ﮐﺸﺸـﯽ ﮐـﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﯿﻤﺴﺎز دو ﻧﻮع ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ‪ R΄ ,R‬ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ و ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ زاوﯾﻪ‬ ‫‪ 45‬درﺟﻪ ﻣﯽﺳﺎزﻧﺪ و ‪ (5‬ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﻮازي ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫آﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ‪ Y‬ﮔﻮﯾﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت اﺧﯿﺮ ﻧﺸﺎن داده اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ‬ ‫ﺗﻤﺮﮐﺰ ﻧﻔﻮذﯾﻬﺎي ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي و ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﭘـﻮرﻓﯿﺮي‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺮاه آﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎن ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﻓﺮﻋـﯽ ﯾـﮏ زون ﺑﺮﺷـﯽ‬ ‫ﻣـﯽﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ‪(Cox et al., 2001; Tosdal and Richards, ،‬‬ ‫)‪ .2001‬ﻧﻤﻮدارﻫﺎي ﮔﻞﺳـﺮﺧﯽ ﺗﺮﺳـﯿﻢ ﺷـﺪه ﺑـﺮاي ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي‬ ‫اﺻﻠﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ و ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد ﻧﺸـﺎن‬ ‫ﻣﯽدﻫﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﮔﺴﻞ دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﮔﺴﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ )‪(PDZ‬‬ ‫زون ﺑﺮﺷﯽ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺗﻮاﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎﯾﯽ را اﯾﺠﺎد ﮐﻨـﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﭼﻬﺎر دﺳﺘﻪ ﮔﺴﻞ ﺑـﺎ روﻧـﺪﻫﺎي ‪ NNW/SSE‬و‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ روﻧﺪ ‪ NW/SE‬ﮐﻪ در ارﺗﺒـﺎط ﺑـﺎ ﮔﺴـﻞ دﻫﺸـﯿﺮ ‪-‬‬ ‫ﺑﺎﻓﺖ اﺳﺖ و اﻏﻠﺐ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺎ اﯾﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻫﻢﺧـﻮاﻧﯽ‬ ‫دارد و ﺳﺒﺐ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﮔﺮوه ﺳﻮم ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ اﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ روﻧﺪ ‪ NE/SW‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﺟﻮاﻧﺘﺮ از‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي رده ﻗﺒﻠﯽ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ ،‬اﯾﻦ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ ﭼﭗﮔﺮد ﺑﻮده و ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً‬ ‫ﺳﻨﮕﻬﺎي ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ را ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﯽﮐﻨﻨﺪ و ﮔـﺮوه ﭼﻬـﺎرم ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫روﻧﺪ ‪ N/S‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﮔﺴﻞ دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﮐﺖ راﺳـﺖﮔـﺮد‬ ‫در ﺳﻤﺖ ﻏﺮب و ﺟﻨﻮب ﻏـﺮب ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ واﻗـﻊ ﺷـﺪه اﺳـﺖ‪ ،‬اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻞ از ﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﮑﺘﻮﻧﯿﮑﯽ ﻓﻌﺎل اﺳﺖ‪ .‬اوﻟﯿﻦ ﺣﺮﮐﺎت اﯾﻦ ﮔﺴـﻞ در‬ ‫زﻣﺎن ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳﻪ رخ داده و ﺗﺎ زﻣﺎن ﺣﺎل اداﻣﻪ دارد ‪(Zarasvandi‬‬ ‫)‪ .et al., 2005‬ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎ در اﻣﺘﺪاد و ﻫﻢراﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴـﻞ‬ ‫دﻫﺸــﯿﺮ و ﺣﻮﺿــﻪﻫــﺎي ﮐﺸﺸــﯽ ﮐﻮﭼــﮏ‪ 1‬اﯾﺠــﺎد ﺷــﺪه از آن‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷـﺪ‪ .‬اﻧﺠـﺎم آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fractal‬ﻧﺸـﺎندﻫﻨـﺪه ﺑـﺎﻻﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﺑﻌـﺪ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ در ﻧﺎﺣﯿﻪ ﺟﻨـﻮب ﻏﺮﺑـﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد ﺑـﻮده و ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﻋﺒﺎرﺗﯽ اﯾﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﯿﻪ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮع ﻃﻮل ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ را ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﺳــﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﻨــﺎﻃﻖ دارا ﻣــﯽﺑﺎﺷــﺪ )ﺷــﮑﻞ ‪.(Db = 1/7002) (7‬‬ ‫اﻟﮕﻮي ‪ Fry‬ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از ﺗﺠﻤﻊ اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ‪/‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ‪ ،‬ﮔﻮﯾـﺎي‬ ‫دو روﻧـــﺪ ﻋﻤـــﻮﻣﯽ ﺗﺠﻤـــﻊ ﮐﺎﻧﯿـــﺎﯾﯽ در ﺟﻬـــﺖ ‪ NW/SE‬و‬ ‫‪ NE/SW‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬اﯾﻦ روﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻤﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ‬ ‫از ﺟﻬﺖﮔﯿﺮي اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﯽ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪه اﺳﺖ )ﺷـﮑﻞ ‪.(3‬‬ ‫ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﻧﻘﻄﻪاي ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﺑـﺎ اﺳـﺘﻔﺎده‬ ‫از روش ‪ Fry‬ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه وﺟﻮد ﻣﯿﺪان اﺳﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﻏﺎﻟـﺐ ﺑـﺎ روﻧـﺪ‬ ‫‪ NW/SE‬و ‪ NE/SW‬در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد اﺳـﺖ ﮐـﻪ ﺑـﺎ روﻧـﺪ‬ ‫‪1.- Pull a Part‬‬ ‫‪400‬‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ ‫ﻏﺎﻟــﺐ ﺷﮑﺴــﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘــﺖ دارد‪ .‬ﺑﺮرﺳــﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه وﺟﻮد ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي در اﯾﻦ ﻣﺤﺪوده ﻣـﯽﺑﺎﺷـﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫دو ﺗﻮده ﻧﻔـﻮذي اﺻـﻠﯽ را در اﯾـﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺧـﻮﺑﯽ ﻣـﯽﺗـﻮان‬ ‫ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪه ﻧﻤﻮد )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪ .(5‬واﺣﺪﻫﺎي آﻧﺪزﯾﺘﯽ اﮐﺜﺮﯾﺖ واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي‬ ‫ﺳﻨﮕﯽ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ را ﺗﺸﮑﯿﻞ ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ‪ .‬واﺣﺪﻫﺎي ﻧﺎمﺑﺮده ﺑﻪ ﺳﻦ‬ ‫اﺋﻮﺳﻦ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ و اﻏﻠـﺐ ﮐﺎﻧـﻪزاﯾﯿﻬـﺎ ﺑـﺮ روي اﯾـﻦ واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي‬ ‫ﺳﻨﮕﯽ رخ داده اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي اﯾـﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪ و رﺳـﻢ‬ ‫ﻧﻤﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ آن‪ ،‬ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه وﺟﻮد ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﻣﺘﻘـﺎﻃﻊ در‬ ‫دو ﺟﻬــﺖ ‪ NW/SE‬و ‪ NE/SW‬اﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺮرﺳــﯽ ﻣﺤــﻞ وﺟــﻮد‬ ‫اﻧــﺪﯾﺲﻫــﺎي ﻣــﺲ ﺑﯿــﺎﻧﮕﺮ اﯾــﻦ ﻣﻄﻠــﺐ ﻣــﯽﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﮐــﻪ اﻏﻠــﺐ‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ دو روﻧﺪ ذﮐﺮ ﺷﺪه‬ ‫رخ داده اﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺮرﺳــﯿﻬﺎي ﻓﺮﮐﺘــﺎﻟﯽ در ﻣﺤــﺪوده ﺷــﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ‬ ‫ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻮدن ﺑﻌـﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘـﺎﻟﯽ در ﻗﺴـﻤﺖ ﺷـﻤﺎل ﻏﺮﺑـﯽ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎرﺗﯽ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ و ﻃﻮل ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ در اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﺣﯿـﻪ ﻣــﯽﺑﺎﺷــﺪ )ﺷــﮑﻞ ‪ .(Df = 1/748 ) (9‬ﻫﻤــﺎنﻃــﻮر ﮐــﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﯽﺷﻮد‪ ،‬ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺗﻌﺪاد اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ‪ /‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ در‬ ‫ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺷﻤﺎل ﻏﺮﺑﯽ ﮐﻪ ﺑﯿﺸـﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘـﺎﻟﯽ را دارد‪ ،‬واﻗـﻊ‬ ‫ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻪﻫﻤﯿﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻬﺎي ﺟﻨﻮﺑﯽ و ﻣﺮﮐـﺰ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﺪوده ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺗﻌـﺪاد اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ‪/‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴـﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ و ﺑﻌـﺪ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﻪدﻟﯿـﻞ ﺗﻐﯿﯿـﺮ در ﺟـﻨﺲ واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي ﺳـﻨﮕﯽ ﮐـﺎﻫﺶ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﯾﺎﺑﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﺤﻞ وﺟﻮد اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﺑﯿﺎﻧﮕﺮ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﻠـﺐ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ اﻏﻠﺐ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﻘـﺎﻃﻊ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ‬ ‫ﺑﺎ دو روﻧﺪ ذﮐﺮ ﺷﺪه رخ داده اﺳﺖ‪ .‬روﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ از اﻟﮕـﻮي ‪Fry‬‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ و ﻧﻤـﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳـﺮﺧﯽ ﺟﻬـﺖ ﮔﯿـﺮي اﻧـﺪﯾﺲ‪-‬‬ ‫ﻫــﺎ‪/‬ﮐﺎﻧﺴــﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣــﺲ ﻧﺸــﺎندﻫﻨــﺪه روﻧــﺪ ﻋﻤــﻮﻣﯽ در ﺟﻬــﺖ‬ ‫‪ NW/SE‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻫﻢﺧﻮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮﺑﯽ ﺑـﺎ روﻧـﺪ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي‬ ‫ﻏﺎﻟﺐ در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ دارﻧﺪ )ﺷﮑﻞ ‪.(3‬‬ ‫ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪﮔﯿﺮي‬ ‫ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻤﻮدار ﮔﻞﺳﺮﺧﯽ ﺑﻪدﺳﺖ آﻣـﺪه از ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫـﺮ دو‬‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ داراي دو ﺳﯿﺴــﺘﻢ ﮔﺴــﻠﯽ ﻋﻤـﺪه ﺑــﺎ روﻧــﺪﻫﺎي ﺗﻘﺮﯾﺒـﺎً‬ ‫ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬روﻧﺪ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ در دو ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد و‬ ‫ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ در دو ﺟﻬﺖ ‪ NE/SW‬و ‪ NW/SE‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ روﻧﺪ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺧﻀـﺮآﺑﺎد ﮐـﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﺎً در‬‫ﺟﻬﺖ ‪ NW/SE‬اﺳﺖ‪ ،‬ﻣﺮﺑـﻮط ﺑـﻪ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ و ﮔﺴـﻠﻪﻫـﺎﯾﯽ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻫﻢروﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﻞ دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻓﺖ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﮐﺖ راﺳﺘﺎﻟﻐﺰ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪ .‬روﻧﺪ دﯾﮕﺮ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ در اﻣﺘـﺪاد ‪ NE/SW‬اﺳـﺖ‪ ،‬اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫دﺳﺘﻪ از ﮔﺴﻠﻪﻫﺎ داراي ﺣﺮﮐﺖ ﭼﭗ ﻟﻐﺰ ﺑﻮده و ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴـﻠﻪ‬ ‫دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ﺟﻮاﻧﺘﺮﻧﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ ﻧﻔﻮذ دو ﺗﻮده آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺷـﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺳـﺒﺐ ﺗﺠﻤـﻊ‬‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ اﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻪﺻﻮرت اﻣﺘﺪادﻟﻐﺰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﯽﮐﻨﻨﺪ در اﻃﺮاف‬ ‫اﯾﻦ ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ و ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ داراي‬ ‫دو روﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ‪ NW/SE‬و‬ ‫‪ NE/SW‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ روﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ‬‫آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪ Fry‬در دو ﺟﻬــﺖ ‪ NW/SE‬و ‪ NE/SW‬اﺳـﺖ ﮐــﻪ در‬ ‫واﺣﺪﻫﺎي ﺳﻨﮕﯽ ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ اﯾﺠﺎد ﺷﺪهاﻧـﺪ‪ .‬ﮐﺎﻧـﻪزاﯾﯿﻬـﺎ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫روﻧﺪ ‪ NW/SE‬ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﺛﺎﻧﻮﯾـﻪ ﮐـﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺟﻬـﺖ ﺑـﺮش زاوﯾـﻪ‬ ‫ﯾﮑﺴﺎن دارﻧﺪ و ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ‪ P‬ﻣﻌﺮوﻓﻨـﺪ ﻫـﻢﺧـﻮاﻧﯽ دارﻧـﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﻋﺒﺎرﺗﯽ اﮐﺜﺮ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯿﻬﺎ در اﻣﺘﺪاد و ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎي ﻫﻢ روﻧﺪ ﺑـﺎ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻞ دﻫﺸﯿﺮ ‪ -‬ﺑﺎﻓﺖ و در ﺣﻮﺿﻪﻫﺎي ﮐﺸﺸﯽ اﯾﺠﺎد ﮔﺸـﺘﻪاﻧـﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ روﻧﺪ ‪ NE/SW‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﯿـﺖ اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ و‬ ‫ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻣﺲ ﺑﺮ روي واﺣـﺪﻫﺎي ﺳـﻨﮕﯽ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﻦ ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳـﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫اﺋﻮﺳﻦ و ﻣﯿﻮﺳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﺄﺛﺮ از ﻧﯿﺮوﻫﺎي ﮐﺸﺸﯽ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫و ﯾﺎ ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ و ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﮐـﻪ از زون اﯾـﺮان ﻣﺮﮐـﺰي ﭘﯿـﺮوي‬ ‫ﻣﯽﮐﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻮده ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ‪.‬ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑـﺎ روﻧـﺪ ‪ NW/SE‬ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑـﻪ‬ ‫ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ روﻧﺪ ‪ NE/SW‬داراي ﺳﻦ ﺟﻮاﻧﺘﺮي ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ ﻫﻤﺎنﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﮐـﻪ ذﮐـﺮ ﺷـﺪ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ ﺷـﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ دو ﺳﯿﺴـﺘﻢ‬‫آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ وﺟﻮد دارد‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺸـﻪ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎي ﺗﺮﺳـﯿﻢ‬ ‫ﺷﺪه‪ ،‬ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﯿﺸـﺘﺮ ﮐﺎﻧـﻪزاﯾﯿﻬـﺎ ﻣـﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑـﺎ اﯾـﻦ دو‬ ‫ﺳﯿﺴﺘﻢ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽاﻧﺪ ﮐـﻪ در ﺗﻘـﺎﻃﻊ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي اﺻـﻠﯽ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﯾﻬﺎي ﮔﺴـﻠﯽ و ﺑـﺎ ﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﺘـﺎﯾﺞ آﻧـﺎﻟﯿﺰ ‪Fry‬‬ ‫داراي روﻧﺪ ‪ NE/SW‬و ‪ NW/SE‬ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﯿﻦ ﻣﺤـﻞ‬ ‫ﻗﺮارﮔﯿﺮي اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣـﯽﺗﻮاﻧـﺪ ﻣﺘـﺎًﺛﺮ از‬ ‫ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﻧﻔﻮذي آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﺷﺪه در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد ﻧﺸـﺎندﻫﻨـﺪه‬‫ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻮدن ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ در ﻧﺎﺣﯿﻪ ﺟﻨﻮب ﺷـﺮﻗﯽ اﯾـﻦ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﯽ از ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺟـﻨﺲ و‬ ‫ﺳﻦ ﻻﯾﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﯽ دارد ﮐﻪ در ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‪ ،‬ﺟﻨﺲ ﻻﯾـﻪﻫـﺎ‬ ‫اﻏﻠﺐ آﺗﺸﻔﺸﺎﻧﯽ و ﺑﻪ ﺳﻦ ﮐﺮﺗﺎﺳﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﯿﻮﺳﻦ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ‬ ‫ﺗﻌﺪاد اﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎ و ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ در اﯾﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﯿﻪ از ﺳﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺑﯿﺸـﺘﺮ‬ ‫اﺳﺖ و در ﻧﺘﯿﺠـﻪ ﺗﻌـﺪاد اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﺗﺠﻤـﻊ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ راﺑﻄـﻪ‬ ‫ﻣﺴﺘﻘﯿﻢ دارد )‪.(Db =1/7002‬‬ ‫ ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ در ﻣﺤﺪوده ﺷﻬﺮﺑﺎﺑﮏ ﻧﺸﺎندﻫﻨﺪه ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑـﻮدن‬‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ در ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺷﻤﺎل ﻏﺮب ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ اﺳﺖ )‪.(Df - 1/748‬‬ 401 ..... ‫ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ارﺗﺒﺎط ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري ـ زاﯾﺸﯽ ﮐﺎﻧﯽﺳﺎزي ﻣﺲ در ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻀﺮآﺑﺎد‬ ‫ ﺑــﻪﻋﺒﺎرﺗﯽ‬.‫زونﻫــﺎي ﺑﺮﺷــﯽ و ﻣــﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑــﺎ آﻧﻬــﺎ ﺑــﻮده اﺳــﺖ‬ ‫ﺧﻄﻮارهﻫﺎي ﮔﺴﻠﯽ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮏ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ اﺻﻠﯽ در ﺗﻮزﯾـﻊ ﻣﮑـﺎﻧﯽ‬ ‫ و ﺑـﻪﻃﻮر ﮐﻠـﯽ ﺷـﺎﯾﺪ ﺑﺘـﻮان‬،‫ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ دﺧﺎﻟﺖ داﺷـﺘﻪاﻧـﺪ‬ ‫اﯾﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﮐﻪ اﻏﻠﺐ ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎ واﻧﺪﯾﺲﻫﺎي ﻣـﺲ در‬ ‫اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ و ﻋﻤﻠﮑـﺮد ﻣﺤﻠﻮﻟﻬـﺎي ﮔﺮﻣـﺎﺑﯽ ﻧﻬﺸـﺘﻪ‬ ‫ﺷﺪهاﻧﺪ و ﮔﺴﻠﻬﺎ در ﻫﺪاﯾﺖ اﯾـﻦ ﻣﺤﻠﻮﻟﻬـﺎ ﻧﻘـﺶ اﺳﺎﺳـﯽ را ﺑـﺮ‬ ‫ﻋﻬﺪه داﺷﺘﻪاﻧﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎي اﯾﻦ ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ ﻣـﯽﺗـﻮان از ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎ‬ ‫ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮏ اﺑﺰار در اﮐﺘﺸﺎﻓﺎت ﻧﺎﺣﯿﻪاي ﮐﺎﻧﺴﺎرﻫﺎي ﻧﺎﺷـﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ‬ .‫ﻣﺲ اﯾﺮان ﺑﻬﺮه ﺟﺴﺖ‬ References Bazin, D. and Hubner, H., 1969. Copper deposits in iran. Geological survey of iran, Tehran, 232 pp. Carranza, J.M. and Hale, M., 2002. where are porphyry copper deposits spatially localized? A case study in Benguet province, Philippines. Natural Resources Recearch, 11(13): 45-59. Cox, S.F., Knackstedt, M.D. and Braun, J., 2001. Principal of structural control on permeability and fluid flow in Hydrothermal systems. ٍSociety of Economic Geologists Reviews, 14: 1-24. Dehghani, B., 2000. Petrological and geochemical study in Darreh – Zereshk and Turan posht, South westwrn of yazd. M.Sc. Thesis, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran, 107 pp. (in Persian) Hassan Nezhad, A., Moore, F. and Aliabadi, M.A., 2001. Lineament controller of spatial distribution of copper deposits of Zn-Pb deposits in Iran, Using Fry analysis. 5th Symposium of Geologycal Society of Iran, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran. Kesler, S.E., 1997. Metallogenic evolution of convergent margins: Selected ore deposit models. ore Geology Reviews, 12(3): 153171. Khoie, N., Ghorbani, M. and Tajbakhsh, P., 1999. Copper Deposits of Iran, Geological Survey of Iran. Tehran, 421 pp. (in Persian) Mehrabi, A., Rangzan, K. and Zarasvandi, A., 2005. Where is significant location for the porphyry copper Deposits? A case study in south centeral Iranian volcanic belt. 9th (1394 ‫ )ﺳﺎل‬2 ‫ ﺷﻤﺎره‬،7 ‫ﺟﻠﺪ‬ ‫ ﺗـﺮاﮐﻢ ﺷﮑﺴـﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ‬،‫ﺑﻪﻃﻮر ﮐﻠﯽ در اﻃﺮاف دو ﺗﻮده آﺗﺸﻔﺸـﺎﻧﯽ‬ ‫ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺑﺎﻻ رﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﮐﺘﺎﻟﯽ ﻣﯽﺷﻮد و ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪه‬ ‫ﻣﯽﮔﺮدد ﮐﻪ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺗﻤﺮﮐـﺰ اﻧـﺪﯾﺲﻫـﺎ در اﯾـﻦ ﻣﺤـﺪودهﻫـﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ در ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ از ﻧﻮع اﻣﺘﺪاد ﻟﻐﺰ در اﯾـﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘـﻪ‬ ‫و ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ اﯾﻦ ﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯿﻬﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺟـﺎيﮔﯿـﺮي ﭘﻠﻮﺗـﻮنﻫـﺎي‬ ‫ﻧﻔﻮذي ﮔﺸﺘﻪ و در ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮص از ﻧﻮع‬ .‫ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ‬ - ‫ ﺑﻪﻃﻮر ﮐﻠﯽ ﻣﯽﺗﻮان اﯾﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﯿﺎن ﮐﺮد ﮐـﻪ در زون اروﻣﯿـﻪ‬- ‫دﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﻔﻮذ ﺗﻮدهﻫﺎي ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي و وﺟﻮد ﮐﺎﻧﻪزاﯾﯽ ﻣﺲ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮص‬ ‫ﻣﺲ ﭘﻮرﻓﯿﺮي ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎً در ﺣﺎﺷـﯿﻪ ﮔﺴـﻠﻬﺎي ﺑـﺰرگ اﻣﺘـﺪادﻟﻐﺰ و‬ symposium of Geological Society of Iran, The teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. Najafi, A., Abdi, M., Rahimi, B. and Motevali, K., 2010. Spatial integration of fray and fractal analyses in regional exploration: A case study from Bafgh-Posht-e-Badam , Iran. Geologia Colombiana, 35: 113-130. Padilla Garza, R.A., Titley, S.R. and Francisco Pimentel, B., 2001. Geology of the scondida porphyry copper deposit, Antofagosta region, Chile. Economic Geology, 96(2): 307-344. Tanhaei, N., Hassan Nezhad, A. and Dabestani, N., 2010. Lineament controller of spatial distribution of copper deposits of copper deposits in Iran, Using Fry analysis. Initial symposium of Iranin Society of Economic Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. Tosdal, R.M. and Richards, J., 2001. Magmatic and Structural controls on the Development of porphyry Cu  Mo  Au Deposits. Society of Economic Geologists Reviews, 14: 157-181. Turcotte, D.L., 1992. Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysice. Cambridge University, London, 398 pp. Vearncombe, J. and Vearncombe, S., 1999. The Spatial Distribution of Mineralization: Applications of Fry Analysis. Economic Geology, 94(4) :475-486. Yaghoubpour, A. and Hassan Nezhad, A.A., 2006. The spatial distribution of some choromite deposits in iran,using analysis. Journal of Sciences,Islamic Reupablic of Iran, 17(2) :147-152 ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ ‫زراﺳﻮﻧﺪي و ﻫﻤﮑﺎران‬ Zarasvandi, A., 2004. Magmatic and structural controls on localization of the Darreh-Zerreshk and Ali-Abad porphyry copper deposits, Yazd Province, Central Iran. Ph.D. thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz ,Iran, 280 pp. 402 Zarasvandi, A., Liaghat, S. and Zentilli, M., 2005. Geology of the Darreh-Zerreshk and Ali-Abad porphyry copper deposit, central Iran. International Geology Reviews, 47( 6): 620646. ‫ﻣﺠﻠﻪ زﻣﯿﻦﺷﻨﺎﺳﯽ اﻗﺘﺼﺎدي‬ Journal of Economic Geology (1394 ‫ )ﺳﺎل‬2 ‫ ﺷﻤﺎره‬،7 ‫ﺟﻠﺪ‬ Vol. 7, No. 2 (2015-2016) 22 ‫ و‬21 ‫ﺻﻔﺤﺎت‬ ISSN 2008-7306 Investigation of Regional Fractures and Cu Mineralization Relationships in the Khezrabad and Shahr-e-Babak Area: Using Fry and Fractal analysis Alireza Zarasvandi1, Babak Samani1, Houshang Pourkaseb1, Zahra Khorsandi*1and Yaghoub Jalili2 1) Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran 2) Department of Geology, Birjand University, Birjand, Iran Submitted: Dec. 29, 2014 Accepted: June 20, 2015 Keywords: Copper Mineralization, Copper Porphyry, Structural controls, Fry, Fractal Introduction Two main principal aspects for the genesis of porphyry copper deposits have been determined. The first genetic model concerns the petrologic and geochemical processes and the other relates the genesis to crustal deformation and geodynamic conditions (Kesler, 1997). Recent studies (e.g., Padilla Garza et al., 2001) show that the generation and emplacement of porphyry copper deposits may not only be dependent on magmatic and hydrothermal processes, but also that the regional and local tectonic setting plays an important role. Therefore in determining the suitable setting for emplacement of copper and other porphyry intrusions, determination of location of partial melting of the lower crust, generation of batholiths, and their volatile-rich derivative intrusions in the crust seems to be necessary (Carranza and Hale, 2002). Almost all porphyry copper deposits in Iran are located in the Urumieh-Dokhtar magmatic belt. These deposits show distinct spatial and temporal relationship with Miocene granodiorite plutonic rocks emplaced along strike slip faults (Mehrabi et al., 2005). Accordingly, the tectonic setting of ore deposits seem to be the most important factor for regional exploration of porphyry copper systems (Vearncombe and Vearncombe, 1999). There are several methods for analysis of distribution of ore deposits. In this research the role of structural control in the spatial distribution of porphyry deposits has been studied using Fry and Fractal methods. Here, the Fry method is used as a complementary method for Fractal analysis. Materials and methods Fry analysis is a self-adaptive method that is used for point objects. Fry analysis offers a visual *Corresponding authors Email: khorsandiz@yahoo.com approach to quantify the spatial trends in groups of point objects. Fry analysis can also be used to search for anisotropies in the distribution of point objects. More specifically it can be used to investigate whether a distribution of point objects occurs along linear trends, and whether such linear trends occur at a characteristic spacing. There is 37 and 42 copper point's index in the Khezr-Abad and Shar-B-Babak areas. The Fry patterns of copper index for two areas were determined with application of Dot Proc software. Fractal analysis is another technique for determination of regional distribution of faults. In this research the fractal dimension of joints and faults was determined in different locations using box-counting fractal method and drawing the logarithmic graphs. Results - The major faults show NW/SE trends in the Khezr-Abad area. They have a similar trend with Dehshir-Baft fault. Other sets of faults show NE/SW trend. These faults are younger than the Dehshir-Baft and release sinistral sense of shear. - Intrusion of two intrusive bodies leads to the accumulation of strike-slip faults in the vicinity of intrusive rocks. In this region faults and joints mainly show NW/SE and NE/SW trends. - The results of Fry analysis show that the mineralization in the Khezr-Abad occurred in the Cretaceous (and younger) rocks with NE/SW and NW/SE orientations. In the other words, these areas of mineralization are mainly related to the secondary faults or (P faults) in the pull basins and cross cutting points of these faults which have similar strike with the Dehshir-Baft fault. NE/SW mineralization is probably related to the tensional Journal of Economic Geology Zarasvandi et al. stress direction or faults having the general trends of central Iran structures. - The calculations of fractal dimension show that the southeastern parts of the Khezr Abad have higher amounts of fractal dimension (Db= 1.7002). Also there is a relatively higher copper index in this part, indicating a logical relation between fault structures and mineralization. -The generated maps indicate that the mineralization in the Shahr-e-Babak area occurred at the intersection of faults and volcanic system and the Fry analysis shows a NE/SW and NW/SE trend of ore concentration. - Northwestern parts of the Share-e-Babak show higher fractal dimension (Db= 1.748) that occurs in the areas with more volcanic rocks and copper indexes. - Results show that the porphyry copper mineralization mainly occurs near the great faults and related to the fault structures and shear zones in the Urumieh-Dokhtar structural zone. In the other word fault lineaments are the main factors in the local concentration of the ore deposits. Discussion The Study of geometry and mechanism of faults related to porphyry copper deposits is very important for determining the suitable location of ore concentration (Zarasvandi, 2004). For example, shear zones, pull apart basins, and step over along the strike slip faults are proper locations for concentration of porphyry ore deposits (Carranza and Hale, 2002). In this research the Khezr-Abad and Shahr-e-Babak areas have been studied. Plotted rose diagrams show the main role of the Dehshir-Baft shear zone for generating the joints and faults in the KhezrAbad area. In this area faults with NNW/SSE and NW/SE trends are the main direction of ore concentration. They are mainly related to the Dehshir-Baft fault. NE/SW faults show sinistral sense of shear and generally are younger than 22 before mentioned sets. Finally the latest fault sets show N/S trend. The Shahre-e-Babak area is mainly dominated with Eocene igneous rocks. Volumetrically, andesite units are more abundant. Rose diagrams represent the existence of two main conjugate fault sets with NW/SE and NE/SW trends. The main copper indexes are located in the intersection of volcanic rocks with these two fault sets. Also the results of Fractal analyses reveal the higher Fractal dimension in the Northwestern part of the Shahr-e-Babak area. In the other words the most density of joint and faults occurred in this region. References: Carranza, J.M. and Hale, M., 2002. where are porphyry copper deposits spatially localized? A case study in Benguet province, Philippines. Natural Resources Recearch, 11(13): 45-59. Kesler, S.E., 1997. Metallogenic evolution of convergent margins: Selected ore deposit models. ore Geology Reviews, 12(3): 153171. Mehrabi, A., Rangzan, K. and Zarasvandi, A., 2005. Where is significant location for the porphyry copper Deposits? A case study in south centeral Iranian volcanic belt. 9th symposium of Geological Society of Iran, The teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran. Padilla Garza, R.A., Titley, S.R. and Francisco Pimentel, B., 2001. Geology of the scondida porphyry copper deposit, Antofagosta region, Chile. Economic Geology, 96(2): 307-344. Vearncombe, J. and Vearncombe, S., 1999. The Spatial Distribution of Mineralization: Applications of Fry Analysis. Economic Geology, 94(4) :475-486. Zarasvandi, A., 2004. Magmatic and structural controls on localization of the Darreh-Zerreshk and Ali-Abad porphyry copper deposits, Yazd Province, Central Iran. Ph.D. thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz ,Iran, 280 pp.