Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
STUDENT’S WAYS OF SPENDING LEISURE TIME. A CASE STUDY ON
THE BACHELOR DEGREE STUDENTS OF UASVM
Ionela Mituko VLAD, Elena STOIAN
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, 59 Marasti Boulevard,
District 1, 011464, Bucharest, Romania, Phone: +40213182564, Fax:+40213182888, Emails:
bmitsouko@yahoo.fr, stoian_ie@yahoo.com
Corresponding author: bmitsouko@yahoo.fr
Abstract
In this paper we have analysed the determinants of the students’ leisure time, based on 198 respondents of an
questionnaire. The students are at the bachelor level in the Faculty MIEADR, USAMV Bucharest. The questions
have reffered to the conditions in which students used to spend their leisure time. The performed analysis consisted
in several steps. First, we made a descriptive analysis of the variables, by doing the frequences tables; then, there
were performed correlation tables and the crosstabulation between pairs of variables. In order to verify the level of
the statistical significance among the variables, it was also performed a chi-square statistical test. As general
requirement, we have chosen to emphasise the results by pointing out the influence of the gender and place of
residence variables for the respondents. From the findings of this paper, we have concluded that students of our
faculty have different approaches, divided by place of residence regarding the holidays spend abroad. Meanwhile,
by taking into consideration the gender, we got significant results regarding the responses on level of disponible
revenus (a), the average spending amount by stay (b) and on the persons that accompanies the respondent student
during the holidays (c). There were other results reflected on the level of Pearson coefficient on correlations
between variable regarding the average lenght of the stays, the averge amount spend on accommodation and food
etc.
Key words: leisure time, questionnaire, students, gender, residence
INTRODUCTION
Focusing in the leisure time, we have tried to
design a frame of the young people – student
at our faculty, by conducting on this purpose
an questionnaire. This tool was composed 16
questions on personal data (age, gender,
residence area), on spending amount for
accommodation and food during the holidays,
type of booking, touristic services,
transportation and preferences for travel
destinations abroad and the average spending
amount that they are ready to pay for
holidays. For this study, we relied on a
methodology that has been targeted a number
of analyzes conducted, particularly in light of
coordinates gender and place of residence of
the respondents. Through this approach we
wanted to find out if perception and approach
problems for the students spending holidays,
reflected in the responses received, are closely
related to their gender or their place of
residence, in other words, if there is a
significant difference between the coordinates
listed on the possibilities to spend their free
time. Reffering to the litterature on the same
topics, we have mentioned the appreciation at
a general level on tourism that was made by
Ghazal [3], stated that “Tourism should be
given the status of industry in order that the
facilities and benefits available to the industry
are also available to tourism projects”.
Another approach given by Yoon, Heo and
Lee [10] made from a different point of view,
maybe strictly from a specific education
profile, has shared experiences on “An
adapted version of the Course Experience
Questionnaire (CEQ) administered to tourism
management students…with a questionnaire
previously utilised with students taking
tourism-related
degree
courses…and
accepting that student loyalty is an important
concern and When an educational institution
enhances student loyalty, it is expected to
improve its reputation and education
quality…”. In order to validate the uses of our
401
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
tool, this time with a different purpose, we
have cited another type of analyze based on
structured questionnaires made by Wong
Shun and Wong Kin [11] who clearly
appreciated that ” Structural equation
modeling approach was used to evaluate the
explanatory power and casual links of the
model. The results indicate that relationship
commitment is a strong driver of student
loyalty. Second, relationship benefits,
relationship termination costs, and shared
values are found to have positive influence on
relationship commitment...”. Because the
perception is related also to the touristic sector
and education, the authors Yong and Chih [9]
stated that in order « To investigate and
identify critical attributes for education, we
focused on the professional competency held
by the course designers and on the delivery
creativity and entrepreneurship concepts for
students participating in knowledge or skills
training.” Another approach on gender was
made by Iorga [5] who said that “The
contemporary rural family is subjected to
structural and major identity changes. In this
respect the role of gender identity signifies the
degree to which a person assumes his or hers
behaviors specific to their cultural role”. We
have had in this paper an approach based on
area of residence, and if we think about this
structured approach on gender, there were
studies on that issue; among these, we have
mentioned those where Iorga [6] has made
statements regarding the rural area such as “...
studying gender equality within the rural
family setting we must take into account the
social construction of both genders (male and
female) manifested along the interaction
between the sexes. Gender equality defines
the principle goal of family and social
development,
in
which
the
rights,
responsibilities and personal growth of each
individual is not influenced by being born
male or female but by how they make the
upmost use of their potential.” On the other
hand, Kuan [7], examining gender
differencies with a different approach and has
found that with his purpose to examine the
gender differences „in creative performance
by using the Consensual Assessment
Technique and taken as a whole, the CAT
402
shows some value in examining creative
performance in adult learners.“ To underline,
once again, that obtaining results on
differences in gender, Baer and Kaufman [1]
concluded in their study that “Lack of
differences between girls and boys, and
between men and women, is the most
common outcome of the many studies
reported above. In some cases, especially in
the area of divergent-thinking testing, there
are significant numbers of studies in which
one group or the other scores higher, but these
are generally counter-balanced by studies
showing just the opposite.” Even if there is
not a very recent study, the paper written by
Dale and Robinson [2] expressed at that date,
in theirs research area, habits and youngs’
choisis, that are actually present also in our
country; thus, they stated that “Explores
developments in tourism education to date is
drawing on wider theoretical perspectives
including the ``McDonaldization'' and the
``Disneyization'' of society…”. Another
validation of the methods employed in this
study, was made also by Stoian, Dinu et al.
[8] where it was stated that “…questionnaires
are a good tool that allows quantification and
comparison
of
observation
sets
of
information. The limits the use this tool for
analysis are those that it requires time for
implementation, significant resources and also
important logistics and finally, we will
provide a simplified picture of reality”. With a
very specific investigation over a destination,
Hassan and Shahnewaz [4], have made by
explorations which pointed out a different
point of view; thus, they “examines existing
tourism services of the highly trafficked
destination of Cox’s Bazar Sea beach in
Bangladesh using a tourist satisfaction
analysis. Using observation and selfdetermined questionnaire survey, the study
classified tourist to their demographic and
socioeconomic characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this paper we have conducted an analyse
shaped on three types of computations. The
first approach was based on analysis of
frequency tables. Another approach was the
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
correlation coefficients, in which we obtained
statistically significant coefficients for a
number of variables. These correlations were
also conducted and presented in the light of
the gender and the place of residence of the
respondents. Thirdly, it was followed a
crosstabulation tables analysis and by
contingency tables with the results of chisquare tests coefficient; in turn, they were
discussed in terms of gender and place of
residence. Thus, we have divided the content
of the questionnaire into three major groups,
by the meaning of the questions. The first
group refers to the general conditions of
deploying stays, the second group refers to the
practical aspects of the trips with two direct
questions, and a third group of the questions,
refers strictly to the financial aspects of the
touristic services from which benefited
students surveyed. The second approach of
the study was made by using the correlation
tables with the Pearson’ coefficient, by
bivariate correlation. The pairs for which the
correlation coefficient was with a high level
of signification, were naturaly found later in
the next step; this step consisted in
crosssection tables, which enphasized the
level and statistical signification on pairs of
variables. In that sens, we have investigated
on three dimensions crosstabs and focused,
once again, on gender and place of residence.
In order to decide on the level of statistical
significance, this analyse was, like as usually,
followed by the contingency table of the chisquare test.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this article we used the results of 198
questionnaires processed based on responses
from students of the MEEARD Faculty. In
order to analyze these responses, we used
primarily frequency table, especially for your
personal profile. Thus, we mention that the
sample was made up of 128 women (64.6%),
of which 71 were from urban area and 57
came from rural areas. For males, there were
in total 70 respondents (35.4%), of which 46
were from urban areas and 24 from rural
areas. Overall, the 117 respondents in urban
areas (59.1%) and 81 coming from rural areas
(40.9%) were registered an average age of
22.48 years. Another details to be mentioned
here is the existence of other occupations,
apart from those of being student. In this
respect, the answers showed 85 students
(42.9%) which recorded another paid
occupation, while the remaining 113 (57.1%)
have the only current profession, that of
student (see table 1 below).
Table 1.Gender and residence frequency
F
Gender
M
Total
Count
%
Count
%
Count
%
Residence
1
2
71
57
55.5%
44.5%
46
24
65.7%
34.3%
117
81
59.1%
40.9%
Total
128
100.0%
70
100.0%
198
100.0%
Source : own calculations, 2017
For the correlation coefficients, we only
mentioned that for the bivariate correlation
with the Pearson’ coefficient, and the test of
significance with two tailed, there was one
variable (responses for the questions
regarding level of the average revenu) which
is correlated with 10 other variable and among
these with gender (but not with the residence)
and for instance, not with the one related to
the type of payement for the touristic services.
There were another four variables correlated
with 8 other variables. A closer look was
made for the variables gender and residence.
The first one registered significant
correlations only with three other variables
(level of disponible revenus (a), the average
spending amount by stay (b) and the persons
that accompanies the respondent during the
holidays (c)); meanwhile, the second one is
correlated only with one variable (the 12th)
and is the one regarding the student’ habits to
spend their holidays abroad. Getting these
results, the follow up computation was the
cross-tabulation in order to establish the
statistical significance of the correlation
coefficient. The analyse based on the crosstabs was made for summarize cathegorical
variables, in our case with three types of
variables; in order to get more than two
dimensions in the responses variables, we
have introduced a third control variable. Thus,
from the three way cross-tabulation; one first
result is returned in a summary casses with
403
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
valid, missing and total casses (values). Other
results were given by counting and percentage
within respondents, divided, in our case by
gender, than by residence. These will tell us,
what was happend, in average among the
female and males, respectivly, among the
urban and the rural areas. The next output is
the continuously contingency table which
shows two options for the independent
variables (or predictor variable). We can thus
see, the response’ categories of the dependent
variable; we can also identify the actual
observed values associated with the outcome
and the expected values (values if there is no
association between the two variables). Next
step was to determine if we have statistical
significance in this relationship. Because of
the third control variable, in our case gender
and residence, we have got two partial tables
and one for the total. Thus, in order to
generate and interpret a three-way crosssection tables with a chi-square test for
independence, we displayed in the tables
below the results of the variable 3 („the level
of the average revenue”), controlled by the
third variable, residence. So, we observed that
the lowest percentage of disponible revenu in
urban places is for the higher amount and the
highest percentage is for the interval 5001000lei. We have the same results for the
rural areas in what concern the percentage of
the highest level of the revenu, while the
bigest percentage for the this revenu was
registered for the level 1,000-1,500 lei. The
results splited by gender and on total level are
displayed below (table 2). The chi-square test
indicated us that, on total level, the variable
gender and the revenu can be consider, with
the Person’s corelation coefficient, statistical
significant (p-value < 0.05).
Table 2.Crosstab on gender * variable 3 Level of the average revenue * Residence
Crosstab on gender * variable 3 Level of the average revenue * Residence
Residence
1
11
10.9
2
27
21.8
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
15.5%
7
7.1
15.2%
38.0%
9
14.2
19.6%
female
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
15
12
26.3%
male
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
female
Urban
Gender
male
Rural
Gender
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
Residence
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
In similar conditions, the second computation
was made for the variable 4 (the average
amount usually designated to be spend on
holiday) together with gender, also controlled
by the third variable residence. With one of
three posibles responses (500 lei/person; 500404
Total
4
12
15.2
5
4
6.1
71
71
23.9%
11
11
23.9%
16.9%
13
9.8
28.3%
5.6%
6
3.9
13.0%
100.0%
46
46
100.0%
15
12.7
26.3%
13
14.8
22.8%
10
10.6
17.5%
4
7
7.0%
57
57
100.0%
2
5
8.3%
3
5.3
12.5%
8
6.2
33.3%
5
4.4
20.8%
6
3
25.0%
24
24
100.0%
35
35
17.7%
54
54
27.3%
49
49
24.7%
40
40
20.2%
20
20
10.1%
198
198
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
12.692
12.724
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
Source: own computation, 2017
Variable 3
3
17
17
10.866
198
df
4
4
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
0.013
0.013
1
0.001
1,000 lei/person, >1,000lei/person), the results
were that students from both urban and rural
zones spending in average 500 lei/person
during a stay.
The results divided by gender are slightly
different (Table 3).
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
Table 3. Crosstab on gender* variable 4 Average amount usually designated to be spend on holiday * residence
Crosstab on gender* variable 4 Average amount usually designated to be spend on holiday * residence
Residence
Variable 4
1
female
Urban
Gender
male
female
Rural
Gender
male
Total
Total
2
3
Count
43
21
7
71
Expected Count
36.4
25.5
9.1
71
% within Gender
60.6%
29.6%
Count
17
21
8
46
Expected Count
23.6
16.5
5.9
46
% within Gender
37.00%
45.70%
17.40%
Count
33
21
3
57
Expected Count
30.3
21.8
4.9
57
% within Gender
57.9%
36.8%
Count
10
10
4
24
Expected Count
12.7
9.2
2.1
24
% within Gender
41.7%
41.7%
16.7%
Count
103
73
22
198
Expected Count
103
73
22
198
% within Gender
52.0%
36.9%
11.1%
9.9%
100.0%
100.00%
5.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Residence
Total
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
df
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
8.926
8.885
8.812
198
2
2
1
0.012
0.012
0.003
Source: own computation, 2017
From the chi-square tests with the value of the
Pearson’ coefficient and the p-value
(Asymp.Sig. 2-sided), we have got statistical
significance for the urban area and for the
total. The 7th variable tabulated with the
gender and controlled by the residence
variable, reffered to the persons that
accompanies the respondents during their
holidays. There were three type of responses;
these people could be only family members
(a), family and friends (b) or only the student’
colleagues (c). The cross-tabulation is listed
below and indicated us that definetly, our
students spend their holidays mainly with the
family and friends; meanwhile, the lowest
score is registered for the first response
(spending holidays with family members).
Still, there is a difference between gender; the
female students, spend more time with the
family, then the male students. So, for this
variable 7, there were registered differences
between gender.
Thus, we pointed out the fact that in urban
area, both females and males spend the lowest
nomber of holidays with family; while in the
rural area, there is a difference between
gender: females spend more time with family
members, while the males did that in a very
small proportion.
All in all, the students spend their holidays
first with family and friends, secondly only
with colleagues and third only with family
members.
The significance of these results comes from
the chi-square tests, which indicated us that
the results are significants for the rural area
and for the Total (p-value, associated to the
chi-square value is < 0.05). From a statistical
significant chi-square tests, we are going to
reject the null hypothesis and say that there is
a significant relationship between the two
variables, so the variable contribute to the
realisation of the analysed variable (in our
case variable 3, 4 and 7).
405
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
Table 4. Crosstab on gender* var 7 Persons that accompanies the respondent during holidays * residence
Crosstab on gender* var 7 Persons that accompanies the respondent during holidays * residence
Residence
1
female
Urban
Gender
male
female
Rural
Gender
male
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
Count
Expected Count
% within Gender
7
6.1
9.9%
3
3.9
6.5%
12
9.1
21.1%
1
3.9
4.2%
23
23
11.6%
Variable 7
2
3
52
12
48.5
16.4
73.2%
16.9%
28
15
31.5
10.6
60.9%
32.6%
39
6
38.7
9.1
68.4%
10.5%
16
7
16.3
3.9
66.7%
29.2%
135
40
135
40
68.2%
20.2%
Total
71
71
100.0%
46
46
100.0%
57
57
100.0%
24
24
100.0%
198
198
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Total
Residence
Pearson Chi-Square
Likelihood Ratio
Linear-by-Linear Association
N of Valid Cases
Value
10.453
10.501
10.169
198
df
2
2
1
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
0.005
0.005
0.001
Source: own computation, 2017
Thus, from the table of chi-square test, we can
say that there is a very strong evidence
(agains the null hypothesis) that among
respondents residence there are two variables
that are independent or not associated in the
population, so we could confidently reject
(with a risck smaller then 5%) the same
hypothesis; thus, there is a strong evidence
that among the analised respondents, there is
a relationship, at least of 5% significance
level. In the opposite case, so when the pvalue associated to the chi-square Pearson
value is greater then 0.05, we can interpret the
statistics that among respondents are
insufficient evidence against our null
hypothesis that the two variables are
independent or not associated. So, in other
words, because the p-value >0.05 (5%
significance level), we will fail to reject our
null hypothesis, so there is no relationship
between the two analysed variables. However,
in some situations, when controlling by
gender, it could be a partial association
between two variables, the relationship
between the two variables is no longer
statistically significant, but a partial
association between remains, for those
respondents where p-value < 0.05. When
406
controlling respondent’ gender, we can
resume that it does appear not to have an
impact on whenever or not their level will
affect (so the first variabe will affect the
second one).
The analysis of the variable referring to the
terms in which „spending holidays abroad”
was analysed by gender and place of
residence; finally this has revealed the
following: in urban areas for females who „go
seldom abroad” for holidays has recorded the
highest score, while the lowest score was
recorded for the answer "always go abroad for
holidays". Respondents coming from the rural
areas said that they mostly „never go abroad”,
and the smallest level was for the responses
„always go abroad for holidays”. The male
category, in both areas, urban and rural, have
the highest options for the answers "rarely go
abroad" and, as well as for girls and boys,
answered that only the least go abroad to
spend their holiday. We obtained here though
overall, a positive association, so that we can
say there is a very strong evidence (agains the
null hypothesis) that among respondents
gender has two independent variables that is
associated in the population (Table 5).
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
Table 5. Crosstab on residence* var 12 Spending holidays abroad * gender
Crosstab on residence* var 12 Spending holidays abroad * gender
Gender
1
Urban
Male
Residence
Rural
Urban
Female
Residence
Rural
Total
Total
Count
Expected Count
% within Residence
Count
Expected Count
% within Residence
Count
Expected Count
% within Residence
Count
Expected Count
% within Residence
Count
Expected Count
% within Residence
Chi-Square Tests
Gender
Value
Pearson Chi-Square
7.358
Likelihood Ratio
7.355
Linear-by-Linear Association
6.589
N of Valid Cases
198
24
30
33.8%
30
24
52.6%
13
15.8
28.3%
11
8.2
45.8%
78
78
39.4%
df
2
2
1
Variable 12
2
3
37
10
33.3
7.8
52.1%
14.1%
23
4
26.7
6.2
40.4%
7.0%
31
2
28.3
2
67.4%
4.3%
12
1
14.7
1
50.0%
4.2%
103
17
103
17
52.0%
8.6%
Total
71
71
100.0%
57
57
100.0%
46
46
100.0%
24
24
100.0%
198
198
100.0%
Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
0.025
0.025
0.01
Source: own computation, 2017
From the tables presented above, we can
conclud that in terms of statistical
signification there is one at the level at 5%
between the variables associated, so there is a
signification between the students’ answers to
the question on „Spending holidays abroad”
and place of residence.
CONCLUSIONS
The first conclusion of the study, regarding
the gender was that the highest level of the
revenu disponible for holidays, is registered
for males, both on urban and rural areas.The
analysis of bivariate correlations of variables
where there was added place of residence, we
obtained results which confirmed that gender
differentiation was most relevant in this study.
Upon the second analysed variable reffered to
the the average amount usually destinated to
be spend on holiday, here once again, the
male gender seems to spend more money for
holidays. Meanwhile, the highest level of the
revenu allocated to the holidays, registered
very low scores and there are very small
differences between the genders and between
the urban and the rural areas. From the
analysis of bivariate correlations of variables
that were added like the residence, we
obtained results indicating that gender
differentiation was the most relevant in this
study. Answers to the question related to the
level of the revenue were relevant for
respondents in urban areas, and partialy for
those from rural areas; then, for the question
on the amount that students assign for each
stay – the results were relevant for urban
respondents. The answers for question related
to the persons that accompanies during the
holidays the respondent, was relevant for the
respondents in rural areas. The other variable
analyzed (the average amount usually
destinated to be spend on holiday), once
again, the male gender tend to allocate more
money for holidays. Meanwhile, the highest
level of the revenu designated to holidays
registered very low scores and there are very
small differences between the genders and
between the urban and the rural areas. The last
computation we have made, was on
possibility to spend the holidays abroad; thus,
we have got statistical significance (with the
value of the coefficient Pearson Chi-Square
and its p-value < 0.05) by taking into account
the place of residence; so there is a significant
difference among the people coming from the
different place of residence.
407
Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development
Vol. 17, Issue 2, 2017
PRINT ISSN 2284-7995, E-ISSN 2285-3952
REFERENCES
[1]Baer, J., Kaufman, J.C., 2008, Gender differences in
creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75–105.
[2]Dale, C., Robinson, N., 2001, The theming of
tourism education: a three-domain approach.
International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality
Management, 13(1), 30–35
[3]Ghazal, M., 2012, Tourist’s Satisfaction towards
Tourism Products and Market: A Case Study of
Uttaranchal, Int. J Busi. Inf. Tech. Vol-2 No. 1 March,
2012, pg.16 – 25
[4]Hassan, M.M., Shahnewaz, M., 2014, Measuring
Tourist Service Satisfaction at Destination: A Case
Study of Cox’s Bazar Sea Beach, Bangladesh,
American Journal of Tourism Management, 3(1): 32-43
[5]Iorga, A., 2015a, Specific Perceptions of Gender
Roles within the Rural Family, LUMEN: Rethinking
Social Action. Core Values, pp. 687-691
[6] Iorga, A., 2015b, Study on Gender Equality within
the Contemporary Rural Family, LUMEN: Rethinking
Social Action. Core Values, pp. 693-697
[7]Kuan Chen T., 2013, Examining Gender Differences
in Creativity, The International Journal of Social
Sciences, 30th July 2013, Vol. 13, No.1
[8]Stoian, E., Dinu, T.A., Vlad, I. M., 2015, The
Quality of the Educational Programs in Romania. A
Case Study of Master Degree in Agriculture,
Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, Volume
6, 2015, Pages 696-703
[9]Yong-Quan, L., Chih-Hsing, L., 2016, How to
establish a creative atmosphere in tourism and
hospitality education in the context of China, Journal of
Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education 18
(2016), 9–20
[10] Yoon C., Heo J., Lee S.L., 2016, Examination of
student loyalty in tourism and hospitality programs: A
comparison between the United States and Hong Kong,
Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport &Tourism
Education 18 (2016), 69–80
[11]Wong Shun, M., Wong Kin, H., 2011, Building
Relationship between Education Institutions and
Students: Student Loyalty in Self-Financed Tertiary
Education,
IBIMA
Business
Review,
http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/IBIMABR/ib
imabr.html Vol. 2011 (2011), Article ID 913652, 22
pages.
408