Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Reply to Brunet and Doolittle: Both selected effect and causal role elements can influence human biology and disease

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014
...Read more
LETTER Reply to Brunet and Doolittle: Both selected effect and causal role elements can influence human biology and disease We agree with Brunet and Doolittle (1) on the utility of distinguishing the evolutionarily selected effects (SE) of some genomic ele- ments from the causal roles (CR) of other elements that lack signatures of selection (14). DNA sequences identified by bio- chemical approaches include both SE and CR elements, and genetic variation in both has been implicated in human traits and dis- ease susceptibility. We thus view the Encyclo- pedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) catalog and similar data resources as important foun- dations for understanding the DNA elements and molecular mechanisms underlying hu- man biology and disease. Manolis Kellis a,b,1 , Barbara Wold c , Michael P. Snyder d , Bradley E. Bernstein b,e,f , Anshul Kundaje a,b,d , Georgi K. Marinov c , Lucas D. Ward a,b , Ewan Birney g , Gregory E. Crawford h , Job Dekker i , Ian Dunham g , Laura L. Elnitski j , Peggy J. Farnham k , Elise A. Feingold j , Mark Gerstein l , Morgan C. Giddings m , David M. Gilbert n , Thomas R. Gingeras o , Eric D. Green j , Roderic Guigo p , Tim Hubbard q , Jim Kent r , Jason D. Lieb s , Richard M. Myers t , Michael J. Pazin j , Bing Ren u , John Stamatoyannopoulos v , Zhiping Weng i , Kevin P. White s , and Ross C. Hardison w,1 a Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139; b Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139; c Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; d Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; e Harvard Medical School and f Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; g European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom; h Medical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; i Program in Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605; j National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; k Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089; l Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520; m Marketing Your Science, LLC, Boise, ID 83702; n Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306; o Functional Genomics Group, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724; p Bioinformatics and Genomics Program, Center for Genome Regulation, E-08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain; q Medical and Molecular Genetics, Kings College London and Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom; r Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; s Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; t HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806; u Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; v Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and w Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 1 Brunet TDP, Doolittle WF (2014) Getting functionright. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E3365. 2 Kellis M, et al. (2014) Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(17): 61316138. 3 Germain PL, Ratti E, Boem F (2014) Junk or functional DNA? ENCODE and the function controversy. Biol Philos, 10.1007/s10539- 014-9441-3. 4 Doolittle WF, Brunet TDP, Linquist S, Gregory TR (2014) Distinguishing between functionand effectin genome biology. Genome Biol Evol 6(5):12341237. Author contributions: M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., and R.C.H. de- signed research; M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., and R.C.H. performed research; M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., and R.C.H. analyzed data; and M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., E.B., G.E.C., J.D., I.D., L.L.E., P.J.F., E.A.F., M.G., M.C.G., D.M.G., T.R.G., E.D.G., R.G., T.H., J.K., J.D.L., R.M.M., M.J.P., B.R., J.S., Z.W., K.P.W., and R.C.H. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. 1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: manoli@mit. edu or rch8@psu.edu. E3366 | PNAS | August 19, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 33 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1410434111 Downloaded by guest on May 29, 2020
LETTER Reply to Brunet and Doolittle: Both selected effect and causal role elements can influence human biology and disease 02139; bBroad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139; cDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125; d Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; eHarvard Medical School and fMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114; gEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, United Kingdom; hMedical Genetics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; iProgram in Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605; jNational Human Genome Research Institute, National Manolis Kellisa,b,1, Barbara Woldc, Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; Michael P. Snyderd, Bradley E. Bernsteinb,e,f, Anshul Kundajea,b,d, Georgi kBiochemistry and Molecular Biology, K. Marinovc, Lucas D. Warda,b, Ewan University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Birneyg, Gregory E. Crawfordh, Job CA 90089; lProgram in Computational Biology Dekkeri, Ian Dunham g, Laura L. Elnitski j, and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Peggy J. Farnhamk, Elise A. Feingold j, Haven, CT 06520; mMarketing Your Science, Mark Gersteinl, Morgan C. Giddingsm, LLC, Boise, ID 83702; nDepartment of David M. Gilbertn, Thomas R. Gingeraso, Biological Science, Florida State University, Eric D. Green j, Roderic Guigo p, Tim q r s Tallahassee, FL 32306; oFunctional Genomics Hubbard , Jim Kent , Jason D. Lieb , Group, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Richard M. Myerst, Michael J. Pazin j, Spring Harbor, NY 11724; pBioinformatics Bing Renu, John Stamatoyannopoulosv, i s and Genomics Program, Center for Genome Zhiping Weng , Kevin P. White , Regulation, E-08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, and Ross C. Hardisonw,1 a Spain; qMedical and Molecular Genetics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts King’s College London and Wellcome Trust Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 Downloaded by guest on May 29, 2020 We agree with Brunet and Doolittle (1) on the utility of distinguishing the evolutionarily selected effects (SE) of some genomic elements from the causal roles (CR) of other elements that lack signatures of selection (1–4). DNA sequences identified by biochemical approaches include both SE and CR elements, and genetic variation in both has been implicated in human traits and disease susceptibility. We thus view the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) catalog and similar data resources as important foundations for understanding the DNA elements and molecular mechanisms underlying human biology and disease. E3366 | PNAS | August 19, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 33 1SD, United Kingdom; rBiomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064; sDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; tHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806; uLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093; v Genome Sciences and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195; and w Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 1 Brunet TDP, Doolittle WF (2014) Getting “function” right. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E3365. 2 Kellis M, et al. (2014) Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(17): 6131–6138. 3 Germain PL, Ratti E, Boem F (2014) Junk or functional DNA? ENCODE and the function controversy. Biol Philos, 10.1007/s10539014-9441-3. 4 Doolittle WF, Brunet TDP, Linquist S, Gregory TR (2014) Distinguishing between “function” and “effect” in genome biology. Genome Biol Evol 6(5):1234–1237. Author contributions: M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., and R.C.H. designed research; M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., and R.C.H. performed research; M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., and R.C.H. analyzed data; and M.K., B.W., M.P.S., B.E.B., A.K., G.K.M., L.D.W., E.B., G.E.C., J.D., I.D., L.L.E., P.J.F., E.A.F., M.G., M.C.G., D.M.G., T.R.G., E.D.G., R.G., T.H., J.K., J.D.L., R.M.M., M.J.P., B.R., J.S., Z.W., K.P.W., and R.C.H. wrote the paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest. 1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: manoli@mit. edu or rch8@psu.edu. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1410434111
Keep reading this paper — and 50 million others — with a free Academia account
Used by leading Academics
Yasha Hartberg
Texas A&M University
Richard Cloutier
Université du Québec à Rimouski
Jeffrey Schwartz
University of Pittsburgh
Billie J. Swalla
University of Washington