Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2024, Hyphen
Architectural production has always necessitated a degree of fundamental confidence—or, arguably, even optimism—to be possible. The fact remains that the basic conditions against which we must carry out our work stay in constant and elusive flux. Uncertainty, that is, is among the only certainties in life. We cannot ignore the profound instability of our present milieu: The looming proposition of a post-pandemic scenario, world economies in free fall, the rampant spread of misinformation, politically polarized societies, and myriad social and environmental injustices, to name but a few, represent a complex and often daunting map of action by which architects might aspire to rethink the scope of our discipline. These challenges have rendered the task of envisioning the near future all the more pressing and raised (or resuscitated) urgent and essential questions about the architect’s role.
Architecture should be understood as a logical, rational and appropriate response in a particular context. Any architectural output has to be perceived as being the product of a particular place, at a particular time and for a particular reason. The advent of cutting edge research and the resultant emerging technologies have affected and dictated the current architectural outputs. Today architects design irrespective of climate and geography. All the gaps are filled in by technology which comes with a huge cost to the environment. Architects have a key role to play in achieving the fine balance between human need and sustainability.
Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia, 2006
The 'future' expresses itself essentially in the everyday. A dive back into the 'past' however won't hurt. Our past of the late '60s & '70s was an ideal world for the practice of architecture because it gave birth to Indian architects like Charles Correa, Kanvinde, Doshi, Stein, and Raj Rewal. Architecture was value-based, anchored in strong philosophies and larger-than-life. Inspired by those models of practice, young architects in the late '80s had ideals to follow and a path to pursue. There was a strong sense of nation building and an exciting urge to contribute towards the new-found modernity spurred by Nehruvian ideals. Early '90s brought about 'Liberalization'. The texture of society changed completely with the opening up of markets to private and foreign players. The already bleak circumstances in the villages compounded with substantially impoverished resources, drove hordes of villages to seek employment and a better life in the cities spinning unprecedented waves of migration. Structural changes in the socioeconomic framework resulted in the phenomenal growth of population in the Cities which in turn resulted in the change of the character of the built-form. The sharp contrast between the haves and the have-nots escalated superlatively as migration continued exponentially through into the new Millennium. Liberalization also brought with it an unlimited supply of new materials and technologies, the real fruits of which were only experienced after the turn of the century. These new toys were so enticing that the same architects who were inspired by the Correas and the Doshis, quickly changed colors, and began dispensing architecture in a frenzied hurry. In this excitement to build at a rapid rate and keep pace with competition, massive undercutting of fees began which entered the stream like a cancer and proliferated easily through Government projects resulting in an unhealthy nexus between the Government, the architect and the contractor. THE FUTURE LIES IN THE PRESENT Today it's a fallacy to believe that architecture is 'practiced' in India or even elsewhere. Largely, it's 'service providing' which 90% of architecture firms practice. So why is the misnomer still clouding our minds? The answer is simple. We have not consciously tried to understand what we do. Especially today, due to vast amounts of data noise that we deal with in our daily lives, it's impossible to find the time and space to pause and ponder. So taking things for granted becomes the automatic choice. Acceptability bends as per choices thrown at us by the market. Government open tenders for architectural fees often get awarded at as low as 0.2% to 0.3% of the project cost. What is never brought to public notice is the trajectory of these projects and the eventual cost-to-client due to several craftily strategized escalations. It is observed that NBCC for instance has capped the architect's fees at 0.7%. Even in the private sectors, cut-throat competitive challenges especially with non-architecture companies erode what is left of the once 'thinking' architect. More bendability from architects gets perceived as
2016
Architecture is facing a period of great challenges and possibilities, typical of all crises. In such periods, the paradigms we have taken for granted so far are the same ones that generated the crisis, therefore they should undergo a critical revision and new modes of thought and operation (driven by computation) can be actively explored and pursued. Instead of retreating to intellectual "safe houses", architecture should open itself up to and be restructured by the accelerated pace of change imposed by reality, renouncing obsolete methods of anticipating and exerting control and welcoming a more proactive behaviour. It is therefore of primary importance to promote the exercise of projective imagination.
Conference proceedings to be confirmed.
This double-blind peer reviewed paper, presented at the 10th International EAAE-ARCC conference on Architecture Research Addressing Societal Challenges (Lisbon 15-18 June 2016), illustrates and discusses a unique mapping of architecture practice, tracing arrays of critical, compared to commercial, practice approaches. It visually interprets the sociologist and philosopher Bourdieu’s theories on the interactions between agents and institutions to the field of architecture. Discussions relate Bourdieu’s concepts of habitus and capital to key stages of UK architectural practice from the mid-1950s through 2015. The paper contributes to contemporary knowledge and debates about architects’ shifting roles and practice types in privatised, market-led processes by providing a spatial framework to trace the increasingly fractured nature of the profession. Established and emerging areas of architecture, derived from litera- ture reviews and primary sources, are evaluated as practice types in which agents seek –– at one end of the field –– to preserve, protect, or enhance traditional norms, versus those –– at opposite ends –– who challenge, and at times subvert traditional practice norms in favour of more critical approaches. This is the accepted version of the paper, forthcoming for publication.
In this study Building Futures sets out to explore the future role of architects, asking: who will design our buildings in 2025; what roles will those trained in architecture be doing then and how will architectural practice have changed as a result? Through a series of one-to-one interviews and round table sessions the study aims to examine the breadth of those who shape the built environment: including traditional architects and those working in expanded fields of practice, as well as clients, consultants and contractors. The resulting speculations should be an opportunity for discussion and interrogation- an exploration of the imminent changes likely to affect the industry over the next 15 years.
The straight-horned ships of Achilles, 2024
2. ULUSLARARASI T.ÜRK KÜLTÜR EVRENİNDE ALEVİLİK ve BEKTAŞİLİK BiLGİ ŞÖLENİ BİLDİRİ KİTABI , 2017
Brazilian Geographical Journal Geosciences and Humanities Research Medium, 2014
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2007
International journal of Science Culture and Sport, 2015
Acta Gastroenterologica Latinoamericana, 2014
International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health
Cambridge University Press eBooks, 2018
Kybernetika, 1996