International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
http://iac2013.uitm.edu.my
ISBN 978-983-41527-7-2
Dissertations Acknowledgment Pattern of Malaysian Post
Graduates
Juliana Mohd Nor 1
Ngo Kea Leng2
Mohd Ariff Nafizi Ibrahim2
Che Wan Khalidawaty Khalid2
Abstract
It has been said that text analysis is a field of study that could yield rich results to interested
researchers. This study in particular examines a genre of writing consisting of
acknowledgement in Malaysians post graduates dissertations. It focuses on the structure of
masters’ dissertations acknowledgement written by Malaysian post graduates students from
various races in Malaysia. The purpose of this study is to examine Malaysian post graduates’
acknowledgement patterns, identify insertions of religious element as well as find other
distinctions in the pattern that may make it similar or distinctive to other findings found by other
researchers. The method of this study is by the comparison of structure. The corpus of this study
consists of selected acknowledgements gathered from several Malaysian universities e-print
databases. The results show that there are similarities but also some differences between the
patterns studied. It is acknowledged by the researchers that aside from the indirect rhetorical
nature of Asian writers, there could also be other considerations that could have influenced the
results of the findings.
Keywords: Acknowledgement pattern; distinctions; similarities; indirect rhetoric; post
graduates.
Introduction
Background of the study
Writing a dissertation is hard work and one is never completed without assistance from others.
Thus it is only right and proper to acknowledge these assistance and this action is a seemingly
agreed-must-have-component of dissertations everywhere. Dissertations acknowledgement
writers though, are limited, in the sense that they are only able to write about only limited
number of pages of acknowledgement per dissertation. Being that most people only have one or
1
Juliana Mohd Nor, UiTM Kuala Terengganu, Academy of Language Studies, julia073@tganu.uitm.edu.my;
Ngo Kea Leng, UiTM Kuala Terengganu, Mohd Ariff Nafizi Ibrahim, Che Wan Khalidawaty Khalid, Academy of
Language Studies and Faculty of Business Studies, klngo@tganu.uitm.edu.my, mohda141@tganu.uitm.edu.my,
chewa485@tganu.uitm.edu.my;
2
2
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
two Masters or Doctoral degree dissertation to produce in one lifetime, this render the writing of
acknowledgement as a complicated task due to the fact that most writers tend to want to thank
everyone. Nevertheless, this complicated task is made easier by the fact that there is actually a
common sense of agreement on the proper structure and content of the thesis acknowledgement.
Studies done Al Ali (2006) Jawanees, Salihah & Faizah (2009) as well as those of Zhang
(2012), Lasaky (2011) as well as Yang (2012) and Mohammad Javad (2013), are examples of
researches that have been done previously involving the structure of acknowledgement. With
most of those studies, it begun when Hyland (2004) study proposed a move that tried to define
the generic structure of acknowledgement. The proposed move became a popular method of
analysis and led to the production of other researches highlighting acknowledgement as a genre
of writing. Earlier research like one did by Gianoni (2002) which contrasted native and nonnative acknowledgements, also becomes a source of reference for examining how one genre of
writing can be similar and different with and from each other. Gianoni (2002) in particular
established the general idea that generic frameworks reverberate across linguistic borders but
also reinforce the national proclivities of the disciplinary communities they serve
Literature Review
Analysis of acknowledgement writing whether by its structure or its linguistics features is a
field of study within the Contrastive Discourse Analysis field of study. Earlier proponents of
this study are distinguished figures such as John Malcolm Swales and the American Applied
Linguist John Kaplan. Their work nurtured interest in the study of contrastive discourse analysis
and led to the growth of many discourse based researches. Swales’s work in particular increases
attention to other academic genres as many researchers try to apply his suggested idea genre as
consisting of a framework. They try to come up with a different framework that best explain
their studied genre of writing (Mohsenzadeh 2013). Hyland (2004) framework is one such
example.
When Hyland proposed his generic structure model of acknowledgement pattern in 2004, his
model provides a standard to which written acknowledgement are compared to. From his
model, various other researches began to compare and develop a more precise idea of the
schematic structure of acknowledgement patterns. In his article, Hyland, himself admitted the
necessity of studying acknowledgement written in other languages and with other situational
factors such as age and experience (2004). Thus from that point on other studies of
3
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
acknowledgement have explored other acknowledgement written by others from different
situational backgrounds that may affect the finding that led Hyland to proposed his generic
structure model of acknowledgement pattern in 2004.
One such study was carried out by Al Ali in 2006. His study determines that the moves
structures determined by Hyland’s proposed scheme are influences by the writers own academic
values, socio-cultural practices, and personal identity of the writer. This means that there are
variations to the moves aside to the one proposed. Al Ali in particular found that participants of
his study, who were Moslems, inserted a ‘Thanking God’ moves within the acknowledgement.
This for him supported the notion that cultural and social context may play a role in shaping the
structure and content of an acknowledgement. A Malaysian study conducted by Nor Jawanees
et al (2009) which studied Malaysian Muslim student acknowledgements also noted the same
finding as Al Ali’s. Nor Jawanees et al (2009) also found that participants of her study actually
begin their acknowledgement with a praying move instead of reflective comments on their
research experience which is as proposed by Hyland in 2004. Furthermore, a study done by
Zhang (2012) who studied acknowledgement pattern of Philippines, Chinese and American
English variations, reported that contrary to Hyland’s proposed move, no reflecting moves were
found in this particular study while the announcing moves were underrepresented. Aside from
that, Zhang (2012) also found evidence of religious element (Bible Quotation) included in her
participants’ acknowledgement. Zhang’s study significantly supported Al Ali (2006) and Nor
Jawanees et al (2009) findings that noted religious element inclusion in acknowledgement
written by students from certain backgrounds. A study done by Lasaky (2011) which compared
Iranian and non native Iranian students acknowledgment, also noted the existence of the
‘thanking God’ step. It also stated that in comparison, there is a significance difference between
the Iranian natives and the non native’s use of the ‘thanking God’ step. This according to the
author could be attributed to religious conventions of Muslims Iranian who tend to start and end
works by thanking God. A most recent study by Mohammad Javad (2013), which studied
acknowledgement written in Persian language by native speakers of Persian compared to
acknowledgement written by native speakers of English, also supported the finding.
Mohammad Javad (2013) found that 80% of the Persian’s sample studied committed the
‘thanking God’ step. He too noted that influence of religion in the aspects of life of these
writers and said that such finding can only be expected. In comparing the acknowledgement of
the two different native speakers, he claims that both as much followed the norm as described in
Hyland (2004) scheme.
4
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
Aside from this significant religious element, there are also findings in other studies that
indicate acknowledgement writing can be influenced and therefore have some variations when
compared cross-culturally. Yang (2012) who compared dissertations’ acknowledgement of
Taiwanese authors based in Taiwan universities to Taiwanese authors based in universities in
the U.S. reported that the acknowledgement pattern of these two Taiwanese authors
acknowledgement mostly followed the structured proposed by Hyland in 2004. However
Yang’s study noted that one major difference between the two is the fact that among the
Taiwanese university dissertations acknowledgment, the reflecting moves is comparatively little
in number. Taiwanese in U.S based universities, with numbers twice as high, have reflective
moves in their acknowledgement. Also found is the relatively low number of U.S based
students who committed to steps 3.1 which is the claiming responsibility for shortcomings of
the dissertation.
The findings of all the researches thus far have indeed shown that there are points of similarities
as well as point of differences between dissertations written acknowledgment. The differences
are more apparent if we take into considerations the different social background of the writers.
The fact that most of these findings reflected the same result would indicate that other future
research would also be finding the same conclusion. While that may be true it does not
minimize the fact that most of these studies are limited in their own selves and thus future
studies still need to be carried out because there are always gaps and information that can still
discovered.
Statement of the problem
Dissertation acknowledgement may share the same purpose and that is to express the writer’s
gratitude to all those involved in the writing of the dissertation. This however does not mean
that all dissertations are the same. Hyland (2004) did a genre analysis study of
acknowledgement pattern of Hong Kong graduates’ written research and claimed that
acknowledgement pattern is identifiable by several moves. Subsequent studies by other
researchers supported the claim. Most recent studies however suggested that acknowledgement
pattern may vary depending on the socio cultural norms as well as etiquette of the
acknowledgement writer. These studies however researched and compared acknowledgements
of students in foreign universities and not in Malaysia. The one study carried out by Nor
Jawanees et al (2009), studied only a number of Muslim Malaysian students. This research aims
5
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
to fill the gap and provide a wider and clearer picture regarding this genre of study involving
Malaysians’ dissertation acknowledgements by examining Moslem Malaysians as well as
Malaysian students of different racial background.
Research Questions
1. What is the move structure of MA thesis acknowledgements in English as written by
Malaysians post graduates students?
2. What religious elements were inserted into acknowledgement content of dissertations
researched by Malaysians post graduates students?
3. What are the other variations that can be detected in Malaysian post graduates students
acknowledgement as compared to Hyland’s proposed scheme?
Method and Material
Sample
The corpus compiled for this study is collected from 4 different public universities in Malaysia.
The choice of selection is confined to the selections of thesis available in the e-print databases
made available by these universities. In total, there are altogether 160 samples collected, 40
from each university and from each race namely, Malay, Chinese, Indians and Others (Sabahan,
Sarawakians & Foreign students). All of the items selected were written in English. The
samples selected were from various departments and faculties at the four universities. It was not
possible to collect from other universities as some universities did not made available the
database to the public and some are too new and therefore have limited number of MA
students.
6
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
The table below will sufficiently describe the distribution of the sample.
University
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Universiti Malaya
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Universiti Putra Malaysia
Total
Malay
Chinese
Indian
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
40
40
40
Table 1 Distribution of sample
Others
10
10
10
10
40
Total
40
40
40
40
160
Method of Analysis
All of the samples were analyzed by using the moves structure identified by Hyland in 2004.
Move 1
Move 2
Step 2.1
Step 2.2
Step 2.3
Step 2.4
Move 3
Step 3.1
Step 3.2
Introspective comment on the writer’s
research experience.
Thanking Move
Mapping credit to individuals &
institutions
Presenting participants
Introducing those to be thanked.
Thanking for academic assistance
Thanks for intellectual support, ideas,
analysis, feedback, etc.
Thanking for resources
Thanks for data access & clerical, technical
& financial support.
Thanking for moral support
Thanks for encouragement, friendship,
sympathy, patience, etc.
Announcing Move
Public statement of responsibility &
inspiration.
Accepting Responsibility
An assertion of authorial responsibility for
flaws/errors.
Dedicating the Thesis
A formal dedication of the thesis to an
individual(s)
Table 2 Hyland (2004) Proposed Generic Acknowledgement Moves
Reflecting Move
The same data were then also compared to the other significant finding identified by other
researchers which especially has religious connotations.
Praying Move (Opening)
Thanking God Moves
Nor Jawanees et al (2009)
Al Ali ( 2006)
Nor Jawanees et al ( 2009)
Lasaky (2011)
Mohammad Javad (2013)
Religious quotation
Zhang (2012)
Table 3 Religious element/influence in Acknowledgement Content
7
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
Results
The result of this study is as shown and described in the tables below.
RQ1: What is the move structure of MA thesis acknowledgements in English as written by
Malaysian students of different races?
Malay
Move 1
Move 2
Move 3
Chinese
Indian
Others
2
3
4
Reflecting Move
Thanking Move
Step 2.1
9
13
10
Step 2.2
40
40
40
Step 2.3
37
40
38
Step 2.4
40
40
40
Announcing Move
Step 3.1
0
0
1
Step 3.2
1
4
2
Table 4 Move structure compared to Hyland’s 2004 scheme
4
Total
n
(160)
12
12
40
34
34
44
160
149
154
0
1
1
8
From the above table it is found that the reflecting move is small in number for all Malaysian
students of different races. Others had the highest move (4), followed by Chinese and Indian (3)
and Malay had the least (2).
Out of 160 samples, all students made their thanking moves for academic assistance. The same
went with the thanking move for moral support with the exception for Others having short of 6
moves. Chinese had the highest (100%) thanking move for resources, followed by Indian
(95%), Malay (93%) and Others (85%). Thanking move for presenting participants did not
carry even one third of the Malaysian students of different races acknowledgements. Chinese
acknowledgement is 32.5%, Others is 30%, Indian is 25%, and Malay is 23%.
Also found for move 3, no Malay, Chinese and Others Malaysian students committed to
accepting responsibility for flaws/errors. However, only one Indian writer is having the
exception. Dedicating writers’ work to others is not popular among Malaysian students of
different races. Only a small number dedicated their work.
8
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
RQ2: What religious elements were inserted into acknowledgement content of dissertations
researched by Malaysians post graduates students?
Malay
Prayers
Thanking God
Religious Quotation
Chinese
Indian
Others
12
4
10
126
0
5
0
0
0
Table 5 Religious element inclusion
2
15
1
Total
n (160)
28
36
1
From the data which we collected we found that there were only 3 religious elements found in
this study. There were the elements of Prayers, thanking God and the elements of the religious
quotation. Out of 160 samples there were only 28 (17.5%) samples stated the element of Prayers
in their acknowledgements. While 36 (22.5%) samples stated the element of Thanking God and
only 1(0.6%) sample had the religious quotation element written in his/her dissertation
acknowledgement.
RQ3: What are the other variations that can be detected in Malaysian post graduates students
acknowledgement as compared to Hyland’s proposed scheme?
Malay
Chinese
Indian
Others
2
2
3
Lack of reflecting moves
1
4
3
Lack of announcing moves
Repetitive steps
Move 2
Thanking Move
Step 2.1
9
13
10
Step 2.2
40
42
40
Step 2.3
37
48
38
Step 2.4
42
48
40
6
1
1
Hope, wishes and prayer
0
1
0
Poetry quote
0
2
0
Named
Table 6 Distinctive traits not fitting Hyland’s 2004 scheme
9
1
Total
n (160)
16
9
12
40
34
34
1
0
0
44
162
157
164
9
1
2
The findings of the study also reported six other variants detected in those 160
acknowledgements. Those variants include the lack of reflecting and announcing moves in 25
(15.6%) acknowledgements, the insertion of hope, wishes, prayer and the writers’ names, both
in 9 (5.6%) and 2 (1.25%) acknowledgments respectively, and only 1 (0.6%) acknowledgment
with the insertion of poetry quote. However, a statistically significant variation was found to
9
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
occur in the repetitive steps of thanking move (steps 2.1 to 2.4) which mostly found in the
acknowledgements written by the Chinese as compared to other races.
Results
By looking at the results shown in previous section, it is evident here that acknowledgement
writing can vary and yet at the same time generally follow the structure proposed by Hyland in
2004.While this is not a surprising finding as other researchers have noted it as well (Al Ali
2006, Nor Jawanees et al 2009, Lasaky 2011, Zhang, 2012 & Yang 2012), it is important to
highlight that with regard to Malaysian acknowledgement writers the style of writing is
distinctive with the dispersion of religious element. Clearly here culture plays a big role. Asian
writers do not regard their endeavor as free standing. For some if not most, their academic
endeavor would not have come to fruition without Divine’s assistance. The same is finding is
reported in studies done by Al Ali (2006), Lasaky (2011) as well as Mohammad Javad (2013).
Although those studies specifically refer to Middle Eastern graduates’ acknowledgement writers
who are most likely Muslims, this particular study shows that religious value can also be found
in acknowledgement written by non-Muslims. While the finding did not provide significant
number of acknowledgement with religious element included, it must be noted that religious
element were found to be included in some acknowledgement regardless of the racial
background of the writer.
Furthermore, Malaysian post graduates dissertations acknowledgement also actually reflects a
social norms and etiquette that also emphasized on family value along with other value such as
academic obligation. Even though there are little difference in the number of steps for thanking
moves for moral support compared to academic assistance, at some of the time it appears in the
finding that the writers remembered to thank their family members first before thanking their
academic supervisors. In some acknowledgements, thanking for moral support also appears
repetitively even after the writer has already moved on to another step in the move structure.
This is also true for other steps. There is a lack of uniformity in the order of use. Steps do not
necessarily follow the order of academic first and personal last. Some of the times, the steps
were even combined together whereby writers would thank their person or people for both
academic and moral support. For example, “I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation to
10
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
the chair of my supervisory committee …I am grateful to her for being patient and encouraging
to me not only in my thesis but also in my work and in my health”.
Other than that, there also seems to a casual flair to the writing in some of the
acknowledgements. For example, paragraphing may not signify new movement but rather new
group of people to thank. The new group of people though may or may not be personal or
academically related to the writer. The order is not fixed nor is paragraph membership. For
example, “Special thanks to Prof. Dr. Zainal Ariff, the Head of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery
Department and all the lecturers for their support and encouragement and made 4 years study in
OMFS Department was a great moment in my career… To my beloved wife…and also to my
parent...All sweet memories in this department were unforgettable”
In one acknowledgement, the thanking move even goes to the bus driver who is otherwise an
absolute stranger to the writer. Lack of uniformity in these writings indicates that there is no
fixed rules and structure that were adhered to in the process of writing this acknowledgement.
According to Lasaky (2011) this could be because these students only imitate acknowledgement
written in other dissertation when planning to write their own. Thus there are variety in their
interpretation and implementation of writing.
Conclusions and recommendations
There might be variation in acknowledgement pattern when studied across culture, it is
nevertheless a writing that is supposed to be academic and therefore must portray a certain
organized structure. If the variation is too varied, the genre will be in danger of losing its
scholarly identity. Thus writers of acknowledgement must always be made aware of the
“rhetorical importance of this genre and the ways they can structure their acknowledgements
to promote a competent scholarly identity (Hyland, 2004, pg. 323). Writing dissertations
acknowledgement is “not an opportunity for students to lay aside their academic persona and
freely express themselves in inconsequential flourishes (Hyland and Tse 2004 pg. 273).
Regardless, because it can be seen in the finding that variety and lack of uniformity in structure
contribute to the variation in Malaysian acknowledgment such nature of writing should be
should subject of further studies. Reasons and factors behind the variation should be examined
in more details.
11
Juliana., Ngo, K. L., Mohd Ariff Nafizi., & Che Wan Khalidawaty. (2013). Dissertations
acknowledgement pattern of Malaysian post graduates. International Academic Conference (IAC) 2013.
References
Al-Ali, M. (2006). Conveying academic and social identity in graduate dissertation
acknowledgements. A conference paper presented at the 5th International AELFE
Conference at Zaragoza. 14-16 September 2006.
Cheng, W. (2012). A contrastive study of master thesis acknowledgements by Taiwanese and
North American students. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(1), 8-17.
Giannoni D.S. (2002), Worlds of gratitude: a contrastive study of acknowledgment texts in
English and Italian research articles, Applied Linguistics 23 (1) (2002), 1–31.
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation
acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). “I would like to thank my supervisor” Acknowledgements in
graduate dissertations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 259-275.
Lasaky, F.G. (2011). A contrastive study of generic organization of doctoral dissertation
acknowledgements written by native and non-native (Iranian) students in applied
linguistics. MJAL, 3 (2), 175-199.
Mohammad Javad, M. (2013). Do Persian and English Dissertation Acknowledgments
Accommodate Hyland’s Model: a Cross-Linguistic Study. International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 3 (5). 534-547.
Mohsenzadeh,H. (2013). Rhetorical Move Structure of Literature Book Prefaces in English
and Persian. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 4 (4)317-323.
Nor Jawanees, A.H., Salihah, A,. & Faizah, M. (2009). Variation in Acknowledgement
Patterns of Ten Malay Degree and Master’s Dissertations : A Preliminary Study. A
conference paper presented at the International Conference on Languages UPALS at
Penang. 29 May 2009.
Yang, W. (2012). Comparison of Gratitude across Context Variations: A Generic Analysis of
Dissertation Acknowledgements Written by Taiwanese Authors in EFL and ESL
Contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 1 (5).131146
Zhang,.J.P. (2012) A Cross-Cultural Study of Generic Structure and Linguistic Patterns in
MA Thesis Acknowledgements. The Asian ESP Journal. 8 (1). 141-165