Phytochemistry Letters 4 (2011) 118–121
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Phytochemistry Letters
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/phytol
Lignans from Phillyrea angustifolia L.
Marina DellaGreca *, Anna Mancino, Lucio Previtera, Armando Zarrelli, Simona Zuppolini
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica e Biochimica, Università Federico II, via Cinthia 4, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 7 October 2010
Received in revised form 22 December 2010
Accepted 23 December 2010
Available online 6 January 2011
A new lignan epoxide together with the seven known lignans: pinoresinol, pinoresinol-O-b-Dglucopyranoside, pinoresinol monomethyl ether-O-b-D-glucopyranoside, lariciresinol, lariciresinol-4-Ob-D-glucopyranoside, lariciresinol-40 -O-b-D-glucopyranoside, and syringaresinol monoglucopyranoside
were isolated from the hydroalcoholic and organic extracts of the whole plant of Phillyrea angustifolia L.
(Oleaceae). The structure of the new constituent was elucidated by spectroscopic methods (UV, IR, and
1D- and 2D-NMR) and by mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS), mainly using 2D-NMR techniques.
The effects of these compounds on germination and growth of dicotyledon Lactuca sativa L. (lettuce)
were studied in the 10 4 to 10 7 M concentration range.
ß 2011 Phytochemical Society of Europe. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Phillyrea angustifolia
Lactuca sativa
Phytotoxic activity
Spectroscopic analysis
Lignans
Epoxylignan
1. Introduction
Phillyrea angustifolia L. is a wind-pollinated shrub and one of the
handful of species reported to be androecium. P. angustifolia is a
native Mediterranean species, which has recently been considered
to be suitable for landscaping purposes (De Marco et al., 2005).
Polyphenolic compounds, flavonoids, oleuropein derivatives and
carbohydrates in Phillyrea leaves were identified (Romani et al.,
1996) and carbohydrate distribution may be linked to the
evolution pattern of this species which usually grows in severely
stressed environments (Vitale et al., 2008).
The chemical composition of extracts of P. angustifolia has been
investigated, and resulted in the isolation and structure elucidation
of a novel epoxylignan and seven known lignans.
2. Results and discussion
Fresh plants of P. angustifolia were powdered and infused with
CH3OH:H2O (1:9), for seven days, and successively with
CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:9), for two weeks. The hydroalcoholic solution,
without proteinaceous materials which were removed by centrifugation, was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O. The EtOAc
extract and the crude dichloromethane-methanolic infusion were
fractionated by column chromatography, and the fractions purified
by preparative thin-layer chromatography and HPLC, yielding pure
lignans.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +39 081 674162; fax: +39 081 674393.
E-mail address: dellagre@unina.it (M. DellaGreca).
The lignans were identified as a new lignan (1), pinoresinol (2)
(Pelter et al., 1982), pinoresinol-4-O-b-D-glucopyranoside (3)
(Chiba et al., 1980), pinoresinol monomethyl ether-4-O-b-Dglucopyranoside (4) (Kitagawa et al., 1988), lariciresinol (5) (Davin
et al., 1992), lariciresinol-4-O-b-D-glucopyranoside (6) (Sugiyama
and Kikuchi, 1993), lariciresinol-40 -O-b-D-glucopyranoside (7)
(Sugiyama and Kikuchi, 1993), syringaresinol monoglucopyranoside (8) (Rao and Wu, 1978), by comparison of their spectral data
with those reported.
The EIMS of compound 1 had a molecular peak at m/z 356
consistent with a molecular formula C20H20O6 and a prominent
peak at m/z 135 [C8H7O2]+. The structure of compound 1 was
established using 1H NMR and 13C NMR including COSY, NOESY,
HSQC, and HMBC experiments. The 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1)
showed six aromatic protons as four doublets at d 6.67, 6.75, 6.84
and 6.87, and two double doublets at d 6.63 and 6.70, which were
typical of 1,2,4-trisubstituted aromatic rings. The 1H NMR
spectrum and the 1H–1H COSY spectrum allowed identification
of the H2-7 protons as a double doublet at d 2.84 (J = 10.7, 2.9 Hz)
and 2.65 (overlapped), the H-8 proton at d 2.62 (overlapped) and
the H2-9 protons as double doublets at d 4.26 and 3.72 (J = 9.8, 8.8,
6.7 Hz), additionally the H-70 singlet at d 4.89 and the H2-90 protons
as doublets at d 2.89 and 2.46 (J = 4.9 Hz). In the 1H NMR spectrum
a methoxyl group at d 3.90 and a singlet methylene at d 5.95 were
also present. The 13C NMR spectrum showed 19 carbon signals
(Table 1). The DEPT experiment defined the carbons as a methyl,
four methylenes and eight methines, which were correlated to the
corresponding protons by an HSQC experiment. Long-range
correlations between the H2-7 and the C-2 and C-6 methine
carbons, and the C-1 and C-80 quaternary carbons, the H2-9 and the
1874-3900/$ – see front matter ß 2011 Phytochemical Society of Europe. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.phytol.2010.12.006
M. DellaGreca et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 4 (2011) 118–121
119
Table 1
NMR spectral data of compound 1 in CDCl3.
dHa
Position
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9a9b
10
20
30
40
50
60
70 b
80
90 a 90 b
OCH2O–
30 -OCH3
J (Hz)
6.67 d
2.0
7
6.75
6.63
2.84
2.62
4.26
8.5
8.5, 2.0
10.7, 2.9
7
2, 6, 9, 70
9.8, 8.8, 6.7 9.8, 8.8, 6.7
7, 70
6.87 d
1.9
70 , 30 -OCH3
6.84 d
6.70 dd
4.89 s
8.9
8.9, 1.9
2.89 d, 2.46 d
5.95 s
3.90 s
4.9
d
dd
dd, 2.65 ovd
ov
dd, 3.72 dd
70
7, 9, 20 , 60 , 90
70
20
HMBCb
dC
NOESY
132.6
108.8
147.8
147.8
108.3
121.4
36.4
44.8
71.5
127.5
110.2
146.4
147.8
113.5
120.8
81.3
67.5
46.1
100.9
55.9
c
(q)
(t)
(q)
(q)
(t)
(t)
(s)
(t)
(s)
(q)
(t)
(q)
(q)
(t)
(t)
(t)
(q)
(s)
(s)
(p)
4, 6, 7
1,
2,
1,
1,
7,
3
4, 7
2, 6, 8, 9, 80
90
8, 70 , 80
40 , 60 , 70
10 , 30
20 , 40 , 70
10 , 20 , 60 , 90
8, 70
3, 4
30
a 1
b
c
d
H chemical shift values (d ppm from SiMe4) followed by multiplicity and then the coupling constants (J in Hz).
HMBC correlations from H to C.
Letters, p, s, t and q, in parentheses indicate, respectively, the primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary carbons, assigned by DEPT.
Overlapped.
concentration tested, while compound 7 showed an activity of 35
and 45%, respectively. The results reported in Fig. 2B and C showed
greater phytotoxic activities by compounds 1 and 4. Related to
radicle shoot, compounds 1 and 4 showed at higher concentration
a phytotoxicity estimated at 75 and 85%, respectively. However,
even at lower concentration they retained inhibitory activity of 30
and 40%, respectively. For shoot length, the compounds revealed
approximately 85% inhibition at a concentration of 10 4 M and,
however, greater than 55% at a lower concentration (10 7 M).
It is noteworthy that glycosilated compounds exhibited low
phytotoxic activity (Fiorentino et al., 2007) as compounds 3, 6–8.
Differently, the compound 4 exhibited high activity.
C-7 methylene carbon, C-8 and C-70 methine carbons, and C-80 , H70 and C-20 and C-60 methine carbons, and C-90 methylene carbon in
the HMBC spectrum (Table 1) allowed definition of the planar
structure of lignan 1. According to the structure, the analysis of the
NOESY spectrum showed NOEs of H-2 and H-6 with H2-7 protons,
H-20 and H-60 with the H-70 proton, and the methoxyl with the H-20
proton. The relative configuration of the furan ring (Fig. 1) was
deduced from a detailed analysis of the NOEs observed in the
NOESY experiments. The NOEs of the H-70 b proton with both H2-7,
H-90 b at d 2.46 and H-9b at d 3.72 protons indicated that the phenyl
and the epoxidic oxygen were on the same side of the
tetrahydrofuran ring and the benzyl and the phenyl were in a
trans-orientation. These data led to the structure of (3R,4R,7S) 7(3,4-methylenedioxybenzyl)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)1,5-dioxaspiro[2.4]heptene (1) or its enantiomer, isolated for the
first time.
2
7
O
H and 13C NMR spectra were run on a Varian INOVA 500 NMR
spectrometer at 500 and 125 MHz, respectively, in CDCl3 at 25 8C.
MS spectra were obtained with a HP 6890 spectrometer equipped
O
O
8'
3.1. General experimental procedures
1
9
8
O
3. Experimental
[()TD$FIG]
7'
9'
OMe
5'
OH
The phytotoxicity of the lignans 2 and 5 on the seeds of Lactuca
sativa was previously reported (Cutillo et al., 2003).
Compounds 1, 3, 4, 6–8 were tested for their activities on the
seeds of L. sativa. Their aqueous solutions, ranging from 10 4 to
10 7 M, were used to evaluate the inhibitory or stimulatory effects
on germination, shoot length, and root length of treated lettuce
seeds. They were investigated in accordance with the procedures
optimized by Macias et al. and the results are shown in Fig. 2A–C.
All compounds showed a low inhibition of germination, with
rates of up to 15% at the highest concentration. Moreover, all
showed a good correlation between the activities shown and the
concentrations tested.
With regard to the radicle and shoot inhibitions, compounds 3,
6 and 8 showed a variable behaviour within 25–30% at higher
Fig. 1. Selected NOEs of compound 1.
[()TD$FIG]
120
M. DellaGreca et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 4 (2011) 118–121
3.3. Extraction and isolation
Fig. 2. (A) Effect of compounds 1, 3, 4, 6–8 on germination of Lactuca sativa L. Value
presented as percentage differences from control and are not significantly different
with P > 0.05 for Student’s t-test. (a) P < 0.01; (b) 0.01 < P < 0.05. (B) Effect of
compounds 1, 3, 4, 6–8 on root length of Lactuca sativa L. Value presented as
percentage differences from control and are not significantly different with P > 0.05
for Student’s t-test. (a) P < 0.01; (b) 0.01 < P < 0.05. (C) Effect of compounds 1, 3, 4,
6–8 on shoot length of Lactuca sativa L. Value presented as percentage differences
from control and are not significantly different with P > 0.05 for Student’s t-test. (a)
P < 0.01; (b) 0.01 < P < 0.05.
with a MS 5973 N detector. HR-ESI-MS/MS: Q-TRAP model API2000 LC–MS/MS system equipped with a heated nebulizer source
and using the Analyst software of Applied Biosystem; in m/z. IR
spectra were recorded on a Jasco FT:IR-430 instrument. HPLC was
performed on an Agilent 1100 by using an UV detector. Preparative
HPLC was performed using RP-18 (LiChrospher 10 mm,
250 mm 10 mm i.d., Merck) column. Silica gel 60 (230–400
mesh, Merck) was used for CC, and preparative TLC was performed
on silica gel (UV-254 precoated) plates with 0.5 and 1.0 mm
thickness (Merck).
3.2. Plant material
Aerial parts of P. angustifolia were collected in Castelvolturno
reserve Caserta (Italy) in the spring of 2008 and identified by
Professor Anna De Marco of the Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale
e Funzionale of University of Naples. Voucher specimens (HERBNAQA650) are deposited at the Dipartimento di Biologia Strutturale
e Funzionale of University Federico II of Naples.
Fresh leaves and twigs (23.0 kg) of the plant were frozen at
80 8C, powdered, and infused in the darkness at room temperature with CH3OH:H2O (1:9), for seven days, and successively with
CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:9).
The hydroalcoholic solution, after the evaporation of the
CH3OH, was concentrated in vacuo (850 ml), cold CH3COCH3 was
added (1.0 l) and the mixture was placed on a stir plate overnight in
a cold room. The CH3COCH3 addition produced heavy precipitation
consisting mostly of proteinaceous materials which was removed
by centrifugation. The CH3COCH3 was removed by evaporation and
the clear aqueous extract was partitioned between EtOAc and H2O.
After removal of the solvent, the crude residue of the organic
fraction was chromatographed on Amberlite XAD-2, with H2O,
CH3OH, and CH3COCH3 to give three fractions. The fraction eluted
with CH3OH (55.0 g) was rechromatographed on Sephadex LH-20
by using H2O and successively increasing the CH3OH concentration
by 25, 50 and 100% in CH3OH. Fractions of 10 ml were collected and
fractions with similar TLC profiles were combined. The sixth
fraction eluted with H2O:CH3OH (1:1) (600 mg) was rechromatographed on a silica gel column to give fractions A–P. Fraction C
(200 mg), eluted with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:99), was rechromatographed on a silica gel column to give fractions C1–C10. Fraction
C8, eluted with EtOAc:CH2Cl2 (1:4) contained pure 2 (28 mg).
Fraction H (10 mg), eluted with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:4), was purified
by analytical TLC with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (3:17), to yield pure 4 (3 mg).
Fraction I (216 mg), eluted with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:4), was purified
by analytical TLC with CH3OH:EtOAc (1:9), to yield pure 3 (5 mg).
Fraction L (22 mg), eluted with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:3), was purified
by C-18 HPLC with CH3OH:CH3CN:H2O (1:1:3), to give 8 (3 mg).
Fraction N (16 mg), eluted with CH3OH:CH2Cl2 (1:1), was purified
by C-18 HPLC with CH3OH:CH3CN:H2O (4:1:5), to give 6 and 7
(2 mg, each).
The organic infusion was dried (Na2SO4) and concentrated in
vacuo to yield 150 g of crude residue. It was stored at 80 8C until
purification on silica gel column chromatography, by using CH2Cl2
and successively increasing the EtOAc concentration by 5, 10, 20,
30, 50, and 100% in CH2Cl2, to give twenty fractions. The fourteenth
fraction eluted with EtOAc (4.0 g) was rechromatographed on silica
gel flash chromatography with mixtures of CH2Cl2, EtOAc,
CH3COCH3, and CH3OH, gave fractions A–T. Fraction G (15 mg),
eluted with EtOAc:CH2Cl2 (1:9), was purified by analytical TLC
with EtOAc:CH2Cl2 (1:9), to yield a pure sample of compounds 5
and 1 (5 and 2 mg, respectively). Compound 1: [a]25D 22.0 (c
0.12, CH3OH); IR (CHCl3) nmax 3595, 3058, 2929, 1603,
1250,1034 cm 1; 1H NMR and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; EIMS
m/z 356 [M]+ (40), 325 [M-OCH3]+ (20), 135 [C8H7O2]+ (70);
HREIMS m/z 356.1257 (calcd for C20H20O6, 356.1260).
3.4. Bioassays
Seeds of L. sativa L. (cv Napoli V. F.) collected during 2003, were
obtained from Ingegnoli S.p.a. All undersized or damaged seeds
were discarded and the assay seeds were selected for uniformity.
Bioassays used Petri dishes (50 mm diameter) with one sheet of
Whatman No. 1 filter paper as support. In four replicate
experiments, germination and growth were conducted in aqueous
solutions at controlled pH, using MES (2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid, 10 mM, pH 6). Test solutions (10 4 M) were prepared
in MES and the rest (10 5 to 10 7 M) were obtained by dilution.
Parallel controls were performed. After adding 25 seeds and 5 ml
test solutions, Petri dishes were sealed with Parafilm1 to ensure
closed-system models. Seeds were placed in a growth chamber
KBW Binder 240 at 258 in the dark. Germination percentage was
determined daily for five days (no more germination occurred after
M. DellaGreca et al. / Phytochemistry Letters 4 (2011) 118–121
this time). After growth, plants were frozen at 20 8C to avoid
subsequent growth until the measurement process. Data are
reported as percentage differences from control in the graphics and
tables. Thus, zero represents the control; positive values represent
stimulation of the control; positive values represent stimulation of
the parameter studied and negative values represent inhibition.
3.5. Statistical treatment
The statistical significance of differences between groups was
determined by a Student’s t-test, calculating mean values for every
parameter (germination average, shoot and root elongation) and
their population variance within a Petri dish. The level of
significance was set at P < 0.05.
Acknowledgment
NMR experiments have been performed at Centro Interdipartimentale di Metodologie Chimico-Fisiche of University Federico II
of Naples on a 500 MHz spectrometer of Consortium INCA Lab.
References
Chiba, M., Hisada, S., Nishibe, S., Thieme, H., 1980. 13C NMR analysis of symplocosin
and (+)-epipinoresinol glucoside. Phytochemistry 19, 335–336.
121
Cutillo, F., D’Abrosca, B., DellaGreca, M., Fiorentino, A., Zarrelli, A., 2003. Lignans and
neolignans from Brassica fruticulosa: effects on seed germination and plant
growth. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 6165–6172.
Davin, L.B., Bedgar, D.L., Katayama, T., Lewis, N.G., 1992. On the stereoselective
synthesis of (+)-pinoresinol in Forsythia suspensa from its achiral precursor,
coniferyl alcohol. Phytochemistry 31, 3869–3874.
De Marco, A., Gentile, A.E., Arena, C., Virzo De Santo, A., 2005. Organic matter,
nutrient content and biological activity in burned and unburned soils of a
Mediterranean maquis area of southern Italy. Int. J. Wildland Fire 14, 365–
377.
Fiorentino, A., DellaGreca, M., D’Abrosca, B., Oriano, P., Golino, A., Izzo, A., Zarrelli, A.,
Monaco, P., 2007. Lignans, neolignans and sesquilignans from Cestrum parqui
L’Herr. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35, 392–396.
Kitagawa, S., Nishibe, S., Benecke, R., Thieme, H., 1988. Phenolic compounds from
Forsythia leaves. II. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 36, 3667–3670.
Macias, F.A., Castellano, D., Molinillo, J.M.G., 2000. Search for a standard phytotoxic
bioassay for allelochemicals. Selection of standard target species. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 48, 2512–2521.
Pelter, A., Ward, R.S., Watson, D.J., Collins, P., Kay, I.T.J., 1982. Synthesis of 2,6-diaryl4,8-dihydroxy-3,7-dioxabicyclo[3.3.0]octanes. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1:
Org. Biorg. Chem. (1972–1999) 1, 175–181.
Rao, K.V., Wu, W.-N., 1978. Glycosides of magnolia III: structural elucidation of
magnolenin C. Lloydia 41, 56–62.
Romani, A., Baldi, A., Mulinacci, N., Vincieri, F.F., Tattini, M., 1996. Extraction and
identification procedures of polyphenolic compounds and carbohydrates in
Phillyrea (Phillyrea angustifolia L.) leaves. Chromatographia 42, 571–577.
Sugiyama, M., Kikuchi, M., 1993. Characterization of lariciresinol glucosides from
Osmanthus asiaticus. Heterocycles 36, 117–121.
Vitale, L., Arena, C., Virzo De Santo, A., D’Ambrosio, N., 2008. Effects of heat stress on
gas exchange and photosystem II (PSII) photochemical activity of Phillyrea
angustifolia exposed to elevated CO2 and subsaturating irradiance. Can. J.
Bot. 86, 435–441.