Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Of Lining Up, And Lying Down! Everyone writes opinions, so we will ask questions. And whereas everyone is advising, we will offer options. The first option is that in life, you are either the one deciding, or you are being decided for. In 1964, Tom Mboya, a leading statesman, trade unionist, and the one who initiated the airlift programs in Africa, that led to Obamas father going to the united states, while supporting Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, and fighting his tribemate, a fellow Luo, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, said that since we cannot all be leaders, some must lead, and some must support leaders. Well, this week we were led, and our leader saw in us frogs to be boiled and he put us in cold water, and started adjusting the temperature, and before we realized, we had five years as youth council, but we had lost our right to secret ballot. There is a classic Russian technique, taught to the agents of KGB, to beat interrogators, emotional manipulators, and lie detecting machines. The strategy is that when being questioned, one must say a lie, and a truth, an insignificant truth, all after establishing rapport with the interrogator. It is obvious our leaders have established rapport with us, they give us peanuts, and then, they take. It was Pastor Nimoller, the German Preacher, who noted that when the Nazis started taking away the people’s liberties, they came for little people, and then, slowly by slowly, they grew bolder, and before they realized, they were coming for Catholics, for the communists, and yes, for the pastor himself. The Kikuyu of Kenya have a saying of a mother advising a son, and she tells him: “my son, if you great yourself like a dog, people will treat you like a dog.” This can very well be replaced with my friend, my Ugandan youth, or my dear Ugandans. Maybe the youth, the women, the disabled, and the opposition in Uganda, are treating themselves like Dogs, and maybe not. We must give it to the minister. He was very sly, smart, and strategic with his choice of words, either out of practice and rehearsal, or it is just his nature. He clearly knew that some of us would think telling us to line up is not democratic, and so, he said it is transparent and democratic. He used the word transparent to mean a literal meaning, which is the same meaning why in Kenya in 1992, the lining up was abolished, as was in 19 other African countries in the last 3 decades. He then said it will be less costly, because he knows the public are tired of money being stolen, and misspent, and so, if he saved us the money spent in secret ballots, by people lining up, then we would be more efficient. The choice is between walking, or wheeling, into a voting station, voting in a booth, and walking away, as opposed to coming in, lining up, being counted, then being sent home. The choice is between the risks, potentials for violence, and potential targeting of people in this camp, against people in that camp. In the game of chess, the winner is the one who has the end game in mind, and then, plays the present move. Indeed, Lao Tsu, the great military general, philosopher, and strategist said that the general who wins, must first win in the planning room, before winning in the battlefield. Any observant Ugandan might notice, or not, that the youth are being trained in military tactics, police strategies, and service skills, and if a youth, having been so trained, was to armed with a stick, and indicate where people should vote, then the end result might not be a rocket scientist’s guess. But assuming the youth, having been so trained, take no part in violence, as we know they might, and the voting goes on, with pipelining, will a boyfriend line differently from a girlfriend, a young wife from a newlywed husband, or a family from its pater familia? Are we not really asking them to lie down, and let other choose for them their fate? And how about the Uganda female youth, the women, and the girls, who also have the enviable task to taking care of the homes, in addition to the other tasks society puts on them today. Will lining up make them feel insecure, shy, time wasting, and make them choose to go home and perform chores than line up to be counted? And what about our vision 2040, and our technological revolution? Maybe we are regressing, engaging in a walking backwards, when the world is going toward mobile voting, online voting, and e-voting, we are going to lining up. Btu since the above are social, and strategy arguments, maybe we consider the constitutionality of amending a bill to provide for lining up. In legislative drafting theory, the first rule of drafting is to prevent a mischief. So, what mischief is being prevented by changing voting from secret ballot to lining up? Indeed, since when did secret ballot become a mischievous activity. And having answered that, in any way, we may move to the next question. The constitution, of course, is not written in clear language with defines, with the main reason for provide for interpretation since it is a living document. But there is the spirit of the constitution, as posited by the late Professor. Okoth Ogendo, the great Kenyan Luo Lawyer, who wrote that whereas our leaders are in constant fixation with constitution and laws, there is something much more novel, the spirit of the constitution. Now, would we agree, or not, that the spirit of the constitution prefers people’s choices to be free of fear, intimidation, and repercussions? In Kenya, the Luo land was always opposition, and the governments successively said, “siasa mbaya, maisha mbaya.” In Uganda, there is no particularly opposition part, and hence, the great peace thus far. The one who wants to disturb the waters and play a game of musical chairs is the one who wants to stir trouble. Maybe he needs to let us line up, instead of forcing us to lie down.