This article was downloaded by: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network]
On: 24 November 2010
Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 918588849]
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 3741 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Drying Technology
Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597247
Foam Mat Drying of Alphonso Mango Pulp
P. Rajkumara; R. Kailappana; R. Viswanathana; G. S. V. Raghavanb; C. Rattic
a
Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College and
Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India b Bioresource Engineering,
McGill University, Montreal, Canada c Department of Soil Science and Agri Food Engineering, Laval
University, Quebec, Canada
To cite this Article Rajkumar, P. , Kailappan, R. , Viswanathan, R. , Raghavan, G. S. V. and Ratti, C.(2007) 'Foam Mat
Drying of Alphonso Mango Pulp', Drying Technology, 25: 2, 357 — 365
To link to this Article: DOI: 10.1080/07373930601120126
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07373930601120126
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf
This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or
systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents
will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses
should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss,
actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly
or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Drying Technology, 25: 357–365, 2007
Copyright # 2007 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN: 0737-3937 print/1532-2300 online
DOI: 10.1080/07373930601120126
Foam Mat Drying of Alphonso Mango Pulp
P. Rajkumar,1 R. Kailappan,1 R. Viswanathan,1 G. S. V. Raghavan,2 and C. Ratti3
1
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
Department of Food and Agricultural Process Engineering, Agricultural Engineering College
and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India
2
Bioresource Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
3
Department of Soil Science and Agri Food Engineering, Laval University, Quebec, Canada
The foam mat drying of Alphonso mango pulp using various food
foaming agents, namely soy protein (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5%) with
methyl cellulose (0.5%), glycerol mono stearate (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 and
3.0%), and egg albumen (2.5, 5.0, 10 and 15%) with methyl cellulose (0.5%), was studied. Drying was carried out in a batch type thin
layer dryer at four drying temperatures (60, 65, 70, and 75C) on 1-,
2-, or 3-mm thickness foamed samples. The optimum concentrations
of each foaming agent were determined to be 1% soy protein, 2%
glycerol mono stearate, and 10% egg albumen. All were obtained
after 25 min whipping time. The drying time was lower for foamed
mango pulps as compared to non-foamed pulp at all drying temperatures. Biochemical analysis showed that the foam mat dried powder
at 60C retained a significantly higher (P < 0.05) content of biochemical compounds than at higher temperatures. The treatment
of mango pulp with 10% egg albumen and 0.5% methyl cellulose
and drying at 60C (1-mm foam thickness), retained the highest
nutritional quality characteristics than the other treatments.
Keywords Alphonso mango; Foaming agents; Foam mat drying;
Foam thickness; Mango powder; Mango pulps;
Whipping
INTRODUCTION
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is by nature a highly perishable fruit with a limited shelf life and is susceptible to
mechanical damage during post-harvest handling and
transportation. Therefore, the conversion of the fruit into
powder could be useful not only to reduce the post-harvest
losses but also to retain nutritional quality in the processed
products. New processed food products from mango are
highly desirable, and dehydrated mango can be used in
many food product formulations. Mango powder produced from the mango pulp can be used in puddings,
bakery fillings, fruit dishes for children, and as a flavoring
ingredient in ice cream, yogurt, mango fruit bar, mango
cereal flakes, and mango toffee. Mango pulp occupies a
Correspondence: G. S. V. Raghavan, Bioresource Engineering,
McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue,
H9X 3V9, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; E-mail: Vijaya.raghavan@
mcgill.ca
major share with 19.7% of processed fruits and vegetable
products exported from India.[1]
Foam-mat drying is a process in which a liquid or semisolid material is converted into a stable foam by incorporating substantial volume of air or other inert gases in the presence of a foaming agent, which works as a foam inducer
and=or stabilizer. The foam thus formed is spread as a thin
mat or sheet and exposed to a stream of hot air until it is
dried to the required moisture level. The dehydrated product is conditioned and converted into powder.[2–6]
Few studies have reported on the drying of foamed and
non-foamed fruit juices or purees. Jayaraman et al.[7] dried
mango pulp foam by spreading it as a thin sheet on plain
aluminum trays at a rate of 0.25 kg per tray (40 80 cm)
in a cross flow drier, initially at 80C for 30 min and subsequently at 65–70C for 30–90 min to reduce the drying time.
Baldry et al.[8] prepared Alphonso mango powder using
1.5% polyglyceryl stearate as a foaming agent by spreading
in a 2-mm-thick layer and drying in the temperature range
of 50 to 80C for 20 min to the final moisture content of
3%. Although increasing the airflow rate (58–95 cm=s) at
temperatures between 50 and 70C increased the initial drying rates, a moisture content of less than 5% was not
achieved at 50C, a level normally required for safe storage.
Furthermore, they noted that the drying rate increases as
the foam dries in contrast to the usual drying behavior.
Akintoye and Oguntunde[9] reported that a temperature
of 65C for 90 min was found to be more suitable for
foam-mat drying of soymilk. They also concluded that
the foam drying at 65C occurred in the falling rate period
and that the drying rate is dependent on the foam density.
Beristain et al.[10] found that the best quality pineapple
powder was obtained at 60C with 5 mm foam thickness
by using maltodextrin as the surfactant mixture.
Foam-mat drying of star fruit by foaming with different
concentrations of methyl cellulose and drying as a 5-mmthick layer in a mini kiln smoker at temperatures between
70 and 90C and with an airflow rate of 0.12 m=s showed
357
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
358
RAJKUMAR ET AL.
that obvious color and flavor changes were observed in
the product dried at 90C.[11] Similar foam-mat drying
studies were reported for mango pulp,[12] apple pulp,[13]
cowpea paste,[14] and lemon juice.[15] The transient drying
behavior of banana pulp in terms of capillary model
[ln (M=M0) ¼ Kt] showed that the drying time (t) was
directly related to the thickness of the foam mat.[16] They
also reported that the drying rate constant increased with
an increase in drying temperature.
Generally, pulp and sliced mangoes dry quite slowly in
hot air–drying. This may be due to the dense physical structure of the fruit, as well as its sugar content and chemical
composition. These factors do not allow rapid movement
of internal moisture. But the drying rate can be increased
by making the mango more porous, thus allowing rapid
moisture movement within the fruit. The objectives of this
work are therefore to optimize foaming agents and to study
the foam mat drying characteristics of Alphonso mango
pulp at different temperatures for producing mango flakes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Foaming Experiments
Fresh, fully ripened, firm Alphonso mangoes having
uniform color were selected. The percentage of peel, stone,
and pulp present in the mangoes was calculated. The flesh
portion of the mango was sliced and pulped using a pulper
with a capacity of 0.6 kg per min (Kifco, Cochin, Kerala,
India) for conducting experimental studies. Biochemical
analyses of the fresh mango pulp were carried out to evaluate their relative losses during foam-mat drying. Biochemical analyses for measurement of acidity, pH, total soluble
solids, total sugars, b-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents
of mango pulps were done using standard methods.[17]
Levels of Foaming Agents and Stabilizing Agent Used
during the Experiment
The foaming and stabilizing agents were added to the
mango pulp for the production of the foam and to stabilize
it during the drying operation. The foaming agents,
namely soy protein (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5%), glycerolmonostearate (0.5, 1, 2, and 3%), and egg albumen (2.5,
5, 10, and 15%) were selected for the experiment. To stabilize the foam, 0.5% methylcellulose was added to the foaming agents soy protein and egg albumen only, since
glycerol-monostearate can be used for both foaming and
stabilizing purposes. Considering the limits stipulated in
the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act[18] and with the
results of preliminary foaming trials, the minimum and
maximum levels of foaming agents were selected.
Dispersion of Foaming Agents
The soy protein and methyl cellulose were incorporated
sequentially into the mango pulp for foaming and stabilizing.
For the dispersion of glycerol-monostearate, the mango
pulp was first heated to 60C for a short period of
5 min prior to the addition of the glycerol-monostearate.
There was little loss of ascorbic acid due to the initial
heating. The egg albumen was directly mixed with the
fruit pulp for foaming and the methyl cellulose was added
for stabilizing the foamed pulp.[19]
Foaming Properties
Foaming properties such as foam expansion, foam stability, and foam density were measured for each concentration of each foaming agent and their optimum levels
were identified based on these results. During the entire
study, all the experiments were conducted in triplicate
and the mean values were recorded. The whipping speed
that produced a maximum volume with a minimum density
in the shortest time was identified and used in the foaming
and drying studies.
During the foaming experiments, mango pulp with
foaming agents was whipped at 1400 rpm using whipping
or foaming blades (Braun Multimix M880 handheld
electric mixer) to get maximum foam expansion with minimum density:[20]
V1 V0
100
ð1Þ
Foaming expansion (FE) ¼
V0
where V0 is the initial volume of pulp and V1 is the volume
of foam, cm3. Foam stability was determined by leaving
100 mL of the foamed pulp in a transparent graduated
beaker kept at room temperature for 3 h. The foam drainage in terms of volume reduction was measured as an index
for the foam stability for every 30 min by using the following relationship:[21]
Foam stability ¼ V0
Dt
DV
ð2Þ
where DV is the change in foam volume during the time
interval Dt, and V0 is the initial foam volume.
The density of the foamed mango pulp was determined
in terms of mass-to-volume ratio:[14]
Foam density ðg=cm3 Þ ¼
m
V1
ð3Þ
Foam-Mat Drying
The mango pulp foam was dried using a batch-type thinlayer cabinet dryer. The dryer consists of heating coils, a
blower, a drying chamber, air outlet openings, and a thermostat as shown in Fig. 1. The main purpose of the heating
coils is to heat the incoming air and lower the relative
humidity, thereby facilitating the removal of moisture from
the drying product. Eight coils, each with a capacity of
500 W, were vertically placed on two sides of the drying
359
FOAM MAT DRYING OF MANGO PULP
Moisture Diffusivity
Fick’s second law was used to describe the diffusion of
moisture during drying of fresh and of foamed mango
pulps spread in the form of a thin slab.[22] The equation is:
1
Dð2nþ1Þ2 p2 h
X
Mt
8
2
4L
ð4Þ
¼1
e
2 2
M1
n¼0 ð2n þ 1Þ p
Equilibrium at the interphase as a boundary condition is
a key factor for using Eq. (4). For long drying periods
(t > 5 min), Eq. (4) can be simplified (Mt ¼ MI Mh and
M/ ¼ MI Me) to the following form by taking n ¼ 0:
Mh M e
MI Me
2h
D h
eff2
8 Dp
2
¼ 2 e 4L ¼ Ae 4L
p
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
Moisture ratio (MR) ¼
where A ¼ (8=p2). Equation (5) can be linearized:
Mh Me
Deff h
lnðMRÞ ¼ ln
¼ ln A
MI Me
4L2
FIG. 1. Schematic view of tray dryer.
chamber. The blower is used to supply fresh air to the main
chamber, which drives out the hot moist air from the drying chamber. The blower was installed at the air delivery
side and was run by a 0.5 H.P electric motor. The drying
chamber measuring 100 100 100 cm was constructed
of 3 mm thick mild steel sheets. The drying chamber can
accommodate 24 (90 40 2.5 cm) stainless steel trays.
The temperature inside the chamber was regulated using
a digital k-type thermostat with an accuracy of 1C.
For the foam-mat drying of mango pulp, the homogeneous foamed mango pulps were evenly spread on the
stainless steel trays at a thickness of 1, 2, and 3 mm. The
foam thickness was determined by dividing the known
volume (mass=bulk density) of foam by the drying area.
During preliminary drying tests, it was found that the
foamed and dried mango pulp firmly stuck to the stainless
steel tray, and scraping off the foamed and dried mango
pulp became a serious problem. To prevent sticking and
to facilitate easy removal of the foamed fruit pulp after
drying, the tray was lined with a non-stick food-grade
Teflon sheet. In order to stabilize the temperature inside
the drying chamber, the dryer was operated for a period
of one hour at the required temperature before placing
the trays in the dryer. The trays were taken out of the
drying chamber at 10-min intervals for mass loss determination. The drying rate was computed for the different
drying combinations of time and moisture contents. Drying
curves were modeled using Fick’s law of diffusion. Drying
was continued until the moisture content of the samples
was constant.
ð5Þ
ð6Þ
From Eq. (6), a plot of ln (MR) versus drying time should
give a straight line with a slope P:
Deff
ð7Þ
4L2
The moisture diffusivity (Deff) can therefore be determined from the value of the slope.
The acidity, pH, total soluble solids, total sugars,
b-carotene, and ascorbic acid contents were determined
for the foam mat dried mango pulp after reconstituting
the powders to their original moisture content. The biochemical contents of the reconstituted foam mat dried
powders were statistically analyzed as a factorial completely randomized block design (FCRD) using a statistical
software package (AGRES) and compared with fresh
mango pulps to optimize the drying and foaming parameters. The level of significance was defined at P 0.05.
P¼
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Physico-Chemical Properties of Mango Pulps
The percentage of peel, kernel, and pulp recovery were
found to be 16.8 0.3, 18.3 0.4, and 64.8 0.7%,
respectively. The acidity, pH, total sugar, total soluble
solids, b–carotene and ascorbic acid of the fresh mango
pulp were determined to be 0.46 0.03%, 4.6 0.2,
13.2 0.5%, 19.1 0.4Brix, 7960 3.9 mg=100 g, and
25.12 0.6 mg=100 g, respectively. These results of physical
and biochemical properties are comparable to those
reported by Chauhan et al.[23] and Kansci et al.[24]
Foaming Characteristics of Mango Pulp
The effect of whipping time on foam expansion for
different concentrations of foaming agents is shown in
360
RAJKUMAR ET AL.
TABLE 1
Effects of whipping duration on foam expansion (FE)
Foaming agents
Soy protein with methylcellulose
Glycerol-monostearate
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
Egg albumen with methylcellulose
Foaming
agents
level (%)
FE after
5 min.
(%)
FE after
10 min.
(%)
FE after
15 min.
(%)
FE after
20 min.
(%)
FE after
25 min.
(%)
FE after
30 min.
(%)
0.25 þ 0.5
0.5 þ 0.5
1.0 þ 0.5
1.5 þ 0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.5 þ 0.5
5.0 þ 0.5
10.0 þ 0.5
15.0 þ 0.5
1.1
4.7
6.8
7.1
1.0
3.1
5.2
5.4
1.1
4.7
3.0
7.0
2.6
12.6
19.2
20.9
2.4
10.6
14.2
16.9
3.5
10.8
21.2
25.0
4.3
23.5
41.8
43.3
4.3
20.9
38.2
38.9
8.1
33.8
47.2
46.3
6.4
44.0
68.4
76.1
4.9
35.2
66.5
68.7
12.3
56.4
65.7
74.7
6.4
58.6
88.5
94.6
4.9
56.1
85.3
91.2
12.7
65.6
89.3
94.2
6.4
58.8
88.8
94.8
4.9
56.5
85.6
92.0
12.7
65.9
89.6
94.8
Table 1. An increase in whipping time resulted in an
increase in foam volume. It can also be seen that for the
lowest concentration of foaming agent, increasing the
whipping time up to 20 min increased foam expansion. At
the highest concentration, a whipping time of up to
25 min can be used for all foaming agents. There was no
significant increase in foam volume when the whipping
time was increased from 25 to 30 min. For example, in
the case of 1.5% soy protein with 0.5% methylcellulose,
only 0.26% increase in foam volume occurred for an
increase in the duration of the whipping operation from
25 to 30 min. In the case of glycerol-monostearate and
egg albumen, the increases were only 0.84 and 0.68%,
respectively, for the above increase in whipping time.
Hence, it was decided to conduct all the foaming studies
with a whipping time of 25 min for all types and concentrations of foaming agents.
Among the different foaming agents studied, glycerolmonostearate at 0.5% level recorded the lowest volume
expansion of 0.99%, whereas 15% egg albumen with
0.5% methyl cellulose and 1.5% soy protein with 0.5%
methyl cellulose recorded the highest foam expansion of
94.8%. Kabirulla and Wills[25] reported 35% increase in
foam volume for 1% soy protein while whipping at
10,000 rpm for one minute. In the present study, increasing
the duration of whipping to 25 min increased the foam
volume to 88.5% for the same level of soy protein addition.
Table 2 describes the mango pulp foam characteristics
using different foaming agents. The density of mango
pulp varied between 1.02 and 1.05 g=cm3, whereas after
TABLE 2
Foaming characteristics of mango pulp
Foaming and stabilizing agents
Soy protein with methylcellulose
Glycerol-monostearate
Egg albumen with methylcellulose
Foaming
agent
level (%)
Mass of
fresh pulp
(g)
Vol. fresh
pulp
(cm3)
Bulk density
of pulp
(g=cm3)
Foam
volume
(cm3)
Foam
expansion
(%)
Foam
density
(g=cm3)
0.25 þ 0.5
0.5 þ 0.5
1.0 þ 0.5
1.5 þ 0.5
0.5
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.5 þ 0.5
5.0 þ 0.5
10.0 þ 0.5
15.0 þ 0.5
251.8
252.5
253.8
255.0
251.2
252.5
255.0
257.5
257.5
263.7
276.2
288.7
239.7
243.2
243.9
244.6
243.1
243.7
244.9
246.1
258.2
262.8
272.0
280.8
1.02
1.04
1.04
1.04
1.02
1.04
1.04
1.05
1.02
1.00
1.02
1.03
255.0
386.1
460.5
476.5
255.0
381.5
454.5
472.5
285.0
436.0
514.9
547.1
6.4
58.6
88.5
94.6
4.9
56.1
85.3
91.2
12.7
65.6
89.3
94.2
0.96
0.65
0.55
0.54
0.97
0.66
0.56
0.55
0.91
0.61
0.54
0.53
FOAM MAT DRYING OF MANGO PULP
361
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
whipping for 25 min, it decreased to between 0.97 and
0.53 g=cm3. Hart et al.[3] stated that for foam mat drying,
the optimum range of bulk density of foamed material
should be between 0.2 and 0.6 g=cm3. Foam densities of
0.53 to 0.56 g=cm3 were obtained with all three foaming
agents tested, hence within the recommended limit as
described by Hart et al.[3] for foam-mat drying. For both
glycerol-monostearate and egg albumen, the foam volume
increased and the foam density decreased with an increase
in the concentration of foaming agents.
Foam Stability of Mango Pulp
Foam stability studies were conducted only for cases
where foam densities were in 0.2 to 0.6 g=cm3 range, as
indicated by Hart et al.[3] The results are presented in
Figs. 2–4.
Figure 2 shows that when soy protein concentration was
0.5%, the foam stability was 93.3% after 90 min and 90.0%
after 180 min. Similarly, levels of 1.0 and 1.5% gave 98.0
and 97.2% stability after 90 min and 98.3 and 97.6% after
180 min, respectively. By increasing the soy protein from
1.0 to 1.5%, the stability of the foam increased by only
0.41% after 90 min and 0.36% after 180 minutes.
From this, it is clear that the interaction effect of soy protein with methylcellulose for the stability of foamed mango
pulps was higher at 1.0 and 1.5% of soy protein than at
0.5%. At 0.5% soy protein concentration, the foam drainage was higher and, in turn, the foam stability was lower.
Similar results were reported by Kabirulla and Wills.[25]
Table 2 and Fig. 2 show that foams made using 1.0%
soy protein had a density of 0.55 g=cm3 and stability of
97.2% after 180 min. Since soy protein at 1.0 and 1.5%
levels gave similar results, it was decided to continue
further foaming studies with 1.0% soy protein with 0.5%
methylcellulose.
In the case of glycerol-monostearate, which acts both as
a foaming and a stabilizing agent, it had foam stability
values of 93.7, 97.8, and 98.4% after 90 min and 91.3,
FIG. 2. Foam stability of mango pulp treated with soy protein (SP) and
methylcellulose (MC).
FIG. 3. Foam stability of mango pulp treated with glycerol-monostearate.
97.1, and 97.9% after 180 min for 1, 2, and 3% concentrations, respectively. That is, glycerol-monostearate at 1%
recorded a relatively low stability value as compared to
those for 2 and 3%. Between 2 and 3%, the foam stability
values were similar with 1% variation.
Table 2 and Fig. 3 show that 2% glycerol-monostearate
gave a foam density of 0.56 g=cm3 and a foam stability of
97.8% after 90 min, whereas a concentration of 3% resulted
in a density of 0.55 g=cm3 and a stability of 98.4% after
90 min. Both 2 and 3% concentrations of glycerolmonostearate gave similar results of 0.56 0.06 g=cm3 for
foam density and 97.8 0.7% for foam stability. Hence,
it was decided to select an addition of 2% glycerolmonostearate for further foam-mat drying studies.
Foam stability studies were also conducted by adding egg
albumen at 10 and 15% levels along with 0.5% methylcellulose. The results of the experiments are shown in Fig. 4,
which shows that an increase in egg albumen level increased
foam stability. The increase was 24% higher when the level
of egg albumen was increased from 5 to 10%, while the
increase in foam stability was less than 1% when the egg
albumen level was increased from 10 to 15%. Likewise,
FIG. 4. Foam stability of mango pulp treated with egg albumen (EA)
and methylcellulose (MC).
362
RAJKUMAR ET AL.
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
foam density was similar for 10 and 15% egg albumen
(Table 2). It is also observed that the interaction effect of
egg albumen with methylcellulose for the stability of foamed
mango pulps was higher for 10 and 15% egg albumen. At
5% concentration, the interaction effect was lower, resulting
in turn in a lower foam stability. Hence, to reduce the level of
addition of foaming agent and subsequently the cost, it was
decided to add 10% egg albumen with 0.5% methylcellulose
to conduct the foam-mat drying studies.
Effect of Foam Thickness on Drying of Foamed
Mango Pulps
Foam mat drying of Alphonso mango pulps was carried
out using the various optimized levels of foaming agents
namely 1% soy protein with 0.5% methylcellulose, 2%
glycerol-monostearate, and 10% egg albumen with 0.5%
methyl cellulose. Three foam thicknesses of 1, 2, and
3 mm and four drying temperatures of 60, 65, 70, and
75C in a batch-type (cabinet) thin-layer dryer were studied.
The drying study showed that the egg albumen foamed
mango pulp dried at 60C was found to be the best and
hence these drying kinetics are discussed in comparison
with fresh mango pulp dried at 60C. The effect of foam
thickness on the moisture content of egg albumen foamed
mango pulp during drying at 60C is shown in Fig. 5. From
the figure, it was observed that the time taken for drying a
1-mm-thick foamed mango pulp from 393 to 5.8% (d.b.)
moisture content was 40 min. The time taken for the same
level of moisture reduction for a 2-mm-thick foam was
60 min and for a 3-mm-thick foam, it was 80 min. In the
case of fresh pulp (Fig. 6), the time taken for drying a
1-mm-thick mango pulp from 391 to 6.6% (w.b.) moisture
content was 100 min. For a 2-mm-thick pulp, it was
130 min and for a 3-mm-thick pulp, it was 190 min. Thus,
the reduction in the moisture content of fresh mango pulp
at any point of time during drying was lower when compared to the foamed mango pulps at all thicknesses studied.
FIG. 5. Relationship between moisture content and drying time of egg
albumen–foamed mango pulp at 60C.
FIG. 6. Relationship between moisture content and drying time of fresh
mango pulp at 60C.
This is due to the high viscosity and bulk density of the
mango pulp, which has less surface area exposed during
drying, demonstrating that foaming was beneficial in
reducing drying time.
From Fig. 6, it is also noted that the reduction in the
moisture content of mango pulp at any point of time
during drying increased with a decrease in foam thickness.
As expected, the drying data indicated clearly that the
mango pulps with a smaller foam thickness dried at a faster
rate than that of foamed mango pulps with a greater thickness.
Similar types of drying results were reported by Eduardo
et al.[26] for tamarind foam-mat treated with egg albumen
and by Falade et al.[14] for cowpea treated with egg albumen.
The calculated drying rates for egg albumen foamed
mango pulp were 0.194, 0.324, and 0.403 g=min during the
first 10 min, and 0.015, 0.023, and 0.037 g=min during the
final stage of drying for 1-, 2-, and 3-mm-thick foams,
respectively. For the fresh pulp, the drying rates were
0.176, 0.273, 0.349 g=min during the first 10 min and 0.013,
0.022, and 0.024 g=min in the final stage of drying for 1-,
2-, and 3-mm-thick pulps, respectively. This clearly indicates
that foamed pulps dried faster than fresh pulps and that the
drying rate of foamed mango pulp was higher during the
initial stage as compared to the final stage of drying.
Drying of egg albumen foamed mango pulps at all thicknesses occurred during the falling rate period with the rapid
removal of moisture from the thin surfaces of foams. These
drying results are in agreement with the results recorded in
high moisture foods like tomato[7] and papaya.[27]
Moisture Diffusion in Foamed and Fresh Mango Pulps
The moisture diffusivity in foamed and fresh mango
pulps was calculated using the relationship obtained by
plotting ln(MR) vs. time, as shown in Figs. 7 and 8. At
each foam and fresh mango pulp thickness, two trend lines
were drawn by considering two falling rate periods during
363
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
FOAM MAT DRYING OF MANGO PULP
FIG. 7. Relationship between ln (MR) and drying time for egg albumen–foamed mango pulp to determine the moisture diffusion based on
Fick’s law.
drying. The moisture diffusivity was calculated using Fick’s
moisture diffusion equation and specifically from the value
of the slope as shown in Table 3. The average moisture diffusivity values for foamed mango pulps ranged from
7.29 10 9 to 3.51 10 8 m2=s and for fresh mango pulps
it ranged from 2.88 10 9 to 1.71 10 8m2=s at 60C. The
moisture diffusion studies clearly show that foaming gave
higher moisture diffusivities when compared to nonfoamed mango pulp during drying due to larger exposed
surface area in foamed pulps.
Effect of Drying on Dried Mango Properties
The biochemical contents of mango powder obtained at
60 and 75C are shown in Tables 4 and 5 for comparison. It
FIG. 8. Relationship between ln (MR) and drying time for fresh mango
pulp to determine the moisture diffusion based on Fick’s law.
was observed that there was a significant (P 0.05)
reduction in ascorbic acid, total soluble solids (TSS), and
b-carotene content in the mango powder dried at higher
temperature of 75C when compared to drying at lower
temperature of 60C. The loss might be due to the heat
sensitive nature of ascorbic acid, TSS, and b-carotene when
exposed to a higher temperature. Also, these biochemical
changes were higher for 2- and 3-mm-thick foams than
for 1-mm-thick foam due to a longer drying time at larger
thicknesses. Similar reductions in biochemical contents
due to drying were reported by Giovanelli et al.[28] But
the other biochemical characteristics such as pH,
acidity, and total sugar were less affected (P 0.05) by
the increase in temperature and foam thicknesses. It is
found that these biochemical contents could withstand
TABLE 3
Moisture diffusion values based on Ficks’ formula
Foamed pulp
Foam thickness
Regression
equation
y ¼ 0.0788x
þ0.0351
1 mm
y ¼ 0.1399x
(II falling rate)
þ1.2206
2 mm
y ¼ 0.0567x
þ0.0211
2 mm
y ¼ 0.0777x
(II falling rate)
þ0.6168
3 mm
y ¼ 0.0359x
0.0233
3 mm
y ¼ 0.081x
(II falling rate)
þ2.2965
1 mm
R2
value
Moisture
diffusion
(m2=s)
Average
moisture
diffusion
(m2=s)
Non-foamed (fresh) pulp
Regression
equation
0.9941 5.25 10 9 7.29 10 9 y ¼ 0.0381x
þ0.0204
1
9.32 10 9
y ¼ 0.0485x
þ0.3071
0.9981 1.51 10 8 1.79 10 8 y ¼ 0.0276x
þ0.1371
0.9998 2.07 10 8
y ¼ 0.0599x
þ2.6169
0.9984 2.15 10 8 3.51 10 8 y ¼ 0.018x
þ0.0621
0.9688 4.86 10 8
y ¼ 0.039x
þ2.3557
R2
value
Moisture
diffusion
(m2=s)
Average
moisture
diffusion
(m2=s)
0.9981 2.54 10 9 2.88 10 9
0.9961 3.23 10 9
0.9753 7.36 10 9 1.67 10 8
0.9648 1.63 10 8
0.9912 1.08 10 8 1.71 10 8
0.9797 2.34 10 8
364
RAJKUMAR ET AL.
TABLE 4
Biochemical composition of foam-mat-dried mango pulp at 60C
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
Bio-chemical
compositions
Acidity (%)
pH
TSS (Brix)
Total sugar (%)
b-Carotene
(mg=100 g)
Ascorbic acid
(mg=100 g)
Soy protein with
methylcellulose
Glycerolmonostearate
Egg albumen
with methylcellulose
Control
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.42
4.22
19.60
13.26
7905
0.41
4.22
19.60
13.26
7857
0.41
4.22
19.50
13.26
7733
0.41
4.27
18.90
13.25
7227
0.41
4.27
18.80
13.24
7219
0.40
4.28
18.90
13.24
7185
0.46
4.12
20.10
13.75
7945
0.45
4.12
20.00
13.75
7912
0.43
4.13
19.95
13.73
7897
0.45
4.15
19.00
13.30
7950
0.45
4.15
19.00
13.29
7945
0.44
4.15
19.00
13.22
7726
22.49
21.66
17.54
20.11
18.72
15.61
22.65
22.51
19.56
17.62
16.11
13.32
higher temperatures. Comparison of the results for foamed
and non-foamed (control) dried mango pulp generally
showed that the retention of biochemical contents in a
foamed mango pulp was significantly higher than in nonfoamed mango pulp. This might be due to a higher drying
rate with lower drying time in foamed pulp when compared
to non-foamed pulp. A similar observation was made by
Mishra et al.[13] for foam-mat drying of apple.
Overall, it was observed that using 10% egg albumen
with 0.5% methylcellulose, a drying temperature of 60C,
and a foam thickness of 1 mm retained significantly higher
(P 0.05) amounts of biochemical and nutritional qualities
when compared to other foaming agents. This was due to
improved foaming quality with lower drying time.
CONCLUSION
The optimum level of foaming and stabilizing agents
were found to be 1.0% soy protein with 0.5% methylcellulose, 2.0% glycerol-monostearate, and 10.0% egg albumen
with 0.5% methylcellulose. The optimum whipping time
was 25 min. The foam-mat drying study demonstrated that
the time taken for drying egg albumen–treated mango pulp
was 40, 60, and 80 min for 1-, 2-, and 3-mm-thick foams,
respectively. But the time taken for drying the fresh (control) samples was 100, 130, and 190 min for 1-, 2-, and
3-mm pulp thicknesses, respectively. From the moisture
diffusion study, it was observed that the moisture diffusion
was higher in foamed mango pulp than with non-foamed
pulp (control). Based on the overall foam-mat drying
TABLE 5
Biochemical composition of foam-mat-dried mango pulp at 75C
Soy protein with
methylcellulose
Glycerolmonostearate
Egg albumen with
methylcellulose
Control
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
Foam thickness
(mm)
Bio-chemical
compositions
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Acidity (%)
pH
TSS (Brix)
0.41
4.22
19.50
0.41
4.23
19.40
0.41
4.23
19.40
0.41
4.28
18.90
0.40
4.29
18.50
0.40
4.29
18.50
0.42
4.12
19.90
0.42
4.13
19.90
0.41
4.14
19.90
0.44
4.16
18.50
0.43
4.17
18.00
0.43
4.17
17.75
Total sugar (%)
b-Carotene
(mg=100 g)
Ascorbic acid
(mg=100 g)
13.26
7803
13.25
7698
13.24
7602
13.24
7200
13.23
6598
13.23
6914
13.74
7893
13.73
7598
13.71
7625
13.22
7837
13.21
7615
13.21
7127
17.92
13.78
10.75
14.91
11.79
9.26
18.01
13.88
11.27
13.78
9.17
6.95
FOAM MAT DRYING OF MANGO PULP
study, it was concluded that the 10.0% egg albumen 0.5%
with methylcellulose-treated powder dried at 60C with 1mm foam thickness retained the highest biochemical content when compared to all other treatments.
10.
Downloaded By: [Canadian Research Knowledge Network] At: 19:58 24 November 2010
11.
NOMENCLATURE
A
Constant
Deff Moisture diffusion (m2=s)
Equilibrium moisture content (dry basis)
Me
Initial moisture content (dry basis)
MI
MR Moisture ratio
Mh
Moisture content (dry basis) at h time
m
Mass of the foamed liquid (g)
P
Slope of the trend line
t
Thickness of the foam mat (mm)
V1
Volume of foam (cm3)
Volume of solution (cm3)
V0
Greek Letter
h
Time, min
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the All India Coordinated Research
Programme on Post Harvest Technology Scheme, Tamil
Nadu Agricultural University, and the Canadian International Development Agency for their financial and technical supports.
REFERENCES
1. Srinivasan, N.; Elangovan, S.; Chinnaiyan, P. Consumer perception
towards processed fruit and vegetables products. Indian Economic
Panorama 2000, 10 (3), 11–12.
2. Morgan, A.I.; Graham, R.P.; Ginnette, L.F.; Williams,G.S. Recent
developments in foam-mat drying. Food Technology 1961, 15, 37–39.
3. Hart, M.R.; Graham, R.P.; Ginnette, L.F.; Morgan, A.I. Foams for
foam-mat drying. Food Technology 1963, 17, 1302–1304.
4. Berry, R.E.; Bissett, O.W.; Lastinger, J.C. Method for evaluating
foams from citrus concentrates. Food Technology 1965, 19 (2), 144–147.
5. Chandak, A.J.; Chivate, M.R. Recent development in foam-mat drying. Indian Food Packer 1972, 26 (6), 26–32.
6. Labelle, R.L. Principles of foam mat drying. Journal of Food Technology 1984, 20, 89–91.
7. Jayaraman, K.S.; Goverdhanan, T.; Sankaran, R.; Bhatia, B.S.; Nath,
H. Compressed ready to eat fruited cereals. Journal of Food Science
and Technology 1974, 11 (3), 181–185.
8. Baldry, G.R; Breag, J.; Caygill, J.C.; Cooke, R.D.; Ferber, C.E.M.;
Lalitha, K. Alternative methods of processing mangoes. Indian Food
Packer 1976, 30 (5), 56–62.
9. Akintoye, O.A.; Oguntunde, A.O. Preliminary investigation on
the effect of foam stabilizers on the physical characteristics and
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
365
reconstitution properties of foam-mat dried soy milk. Drying Technology 1991, 9 (1), 245–262.
Beristain, C.; Cortes, I.; Casilas, R.; Diaz, M.A. Obtainment of pineapple juice powder by foam-mat drying. Archives of Latino-American
Nutrition 1990, 41 (2), 238–245.
Karim, A.A.; Wai, C. Foam mat drying of star fruit puree, stability
and air drying characteristics. Food Chemistry. 1999, 64 (3), 337–343.
Srivastava, J.S. Mango processing industries—A scenario. Indian
Food Packer 1998, 52 (6), 43–49.
Mishra, H.N.; Jacob, J.K.; Srinivasan, N. Preparation of apple
powder and evaluation of its shelf life. Beverage and Food World
2002, 29 (1), 49–52.
Falade, K.O.; Adeyanju, K.I.; Uzo-Peters, P.I. Foam mat drying of
cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) using glyceryl monostearate and egg albumen as foaming agents. European Food Research and Technology
2003, 217 (6), 486–491.
Sharma, S.K.; Sharma, P.C.; Lalkanshal, B.B. Storage studies of foam
mat dried hill lemon juice powder. Journal of Food Science and Technology 2004, 41 (1), 9–13.
Sankat, C.K.; Castaigne, F. Foaming and drying behaviour of
ripe bananas. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technologie 2004, 37 (5),
517–525.
Ranganna, S. Manual of Analysis of Fruit and Vegetable Products. II,
(Reprint); Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd: New Delhi, 1979; 634.
The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Act 37 of 1954, Government of India, 1955.
Rao, T.S.S.; Murali, H.S.; Rao, K.R.G. Preparation of foam mat
dried and freeze dried whole egg powder (hen’s). Journal of Food
Science and Technology 1986, 24 (1), 23–26.
Durian, D.J. Foam mechanics at the bubble scale. Physical Review
Letters 1995, 75, 4780–4784.
Akiokato, A.T; Matsudomi, N.; Kobayashi, K. Determination of
foaming properties of egg white by conductivity measurements.
Journal of Food Science and Technology 1983, 48 (1), 62–65.
Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press:
London, 1975; 414.
Chauhan, S.K.; Lal, B.B.; Joshi, V.K. Development of protein rich
mango beverage. Journal of Food Science and Technology 1998,
35 (6), 521–523.
Kansci, G.; Koubala, B.B.; Lape, I.M. Effect of ripening on the composition and the suitability for jam processing of different varieties of
mango (Mangifera indica). African Journal of Biotechnology 2003,
2 (9), 301–306.
Kabirullah, M.; Wills, R.B.H. Foaming properties of sunflower
seed protein. Journal of Food Science and Technology 1988, 25 (1),
16–19.
Eduardo J.V.; Pardes, G.E.; Beristain, C.I.; Tehuitzil, H.R. Effect of
foaming agents on the stability, rheological properties, drying kinetics
and flavour retention of tamarind foam mats. Food Research International 2001, 34 (4), 587–598.
Levi, A.; Gagel, S.; Juven, B. Intermediate moisture tropical fruit products for developing countries. Technological data on papaya. Journal
of Food Technology 1983, 18 (6), 667–685.
Giovanelli, G.; Zanoni, B.; Lavelli, V.; Nani, R. Water sorption,
drying and antioxidant properties of dried tomato products. Journal
of Food Engineering 2002, 52, 135–141.