J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
DOI 10.1007/s10971-011-2574-9
ORIGINAL PAPER
Photocatalytic TiO2 coatings on limestone
A. Licciulli • A. Calia • M. Lettieri •
D. Diso • M. Masieri • S. Franza • R. Amadelli
G. Casarano
•
Received: 31 March 2011 / Accepted: 29 August 2011 / Published online: 9 September 2011
Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
Abstract The application of photocatalytic coatings on
stone has been investigated for providing surface protection and self-cleaning properties. Sol–Gel and hydrothermal processes were used to synthesise TiO2 colloidal
suspensions and coatings with enhanced photocatalytic
activity without any thermal curing of the coated stone.
The stone was a porous limestone (apulian sedimentary
carbonatic, calcite stone). Films and powders prepared
from TiO2 sols were studied using X-ray diffraction to
evaluate the microstructure and identify rutile and anatase
phases. A morphological and physical characterisation was
carried out on coated and uncoated stone to establish the
changes of appearance, colour, water absorption by capillarity and water vapour permeability. The photocatalytic
activity of the coated surface was evaluated under UV
irradiation through NOx and organics degradation tests.
The performances of the synthesised TiO2 sols were
compared with commercial TiO2 suspension. Since the
coating doesn’t need temperature treatments for activating
the photocatalytic properties, the nano-crystalline hydrothermal TiO2 sols seem good candidate for coating applications on stone that cannot be annealed after the coating
application.
A. Licciulli (&) G. Casarano
Department of Engineering for Innovation, University
of Salento, Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
e-mail: antonio.licciulli@unisalento.it
A. Calia M. Lettieri M. Masieri
CNR-IBAM, Prov.le Lecce-Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
D. Diso S. Franza
Salentec srl, Via dell’esercito 8, 73020 Cavallino, Italy
R. Amadelli
ISOF CNR, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
Keywords Photocatalysis TiO2 Synthesis
Self-cleaning Microstructure Limestone
Cultural heritage
1 Introduction
Titania is considered the most promising photocatalytic
material for the degradation of environmental pollutants: it
is nontoxic, highly efficient, and very stable under UV [1].
The TiO2 photoactivity is strongly influenced by the
microstructure, the presence and concentration of doping
elements, the specific surface area, the particle size [2, 3].
Amorphous titania particles have negligible photocatalytic
activity, the particle crystallisation is essential for the
photoactivity which is generally higher with increasing
anatase phase content [3]. Different methods have been
used to synthesise titania sols and nanoparticles. One of the
most investigated is sol–gel [4–8] but other methods have
been studied as well: homogeneous precipitation [9–12]
and chemical vapour deposition [13].
Sol–gel method is used for the production of suspended
nanoparticles (sols). At room temperature it generally leads
to the formation of amorphous TiO2, so that thermal curing
is required to crystallise powders and coatings. Thermal
curing requires substrate heating, and leads to problems like
particle agglomeration, grain growth, phase transformation
from anatase to rutile, that decrease the photocatalytic
activity of titania [14]. The hydrothermal process allows
particle crystallisation directly in the liquid phase. The
combination of sol–gel and hydrothermal process could be
therefore interesting for the preparation of sols containing
crystallised TiO2 photoactive nanoparticles ready to be
deposited on the substrate without any additional thermal
process [15, 16]. This approach has been undertaken in the
123
438
present work for the application of photocatalytic active
coatings on stone. Thermal curing of stones is not allowed
because in most cases it is traumatic for natural stone [17].
Thermal curing is also not compatible with previous organic
treatments very frequently applied on stone surface for the
conservation purposes (protection, consolidation) [18]. This
is especially the case of the artefacts of historical and
architectural value.
De-soiling and de-polluting properties of photocatalytic
TiO2 have been exploited along with the self cleaning
power on glass surfaces [19]. The application of photocatalytic TiO2 on building facades was the aim of the Picada Project (Photocatalytic Innovative Coverings
Applications for Depollution Assessment), within the
Competitive and Sustainable Growth European Programme
[20]. The addition of TiO2 to lime allows to obtain
enhanced carbonation of lime-TiO2 composites and limebased mortars with photocatalytic properties [21]. Photocatalytic earthenware, to be used for outdoor applications,
such as roof tiles, floor tile, has also been investigated [22].
So far the possibility to use Titania on buildings stones
or for monuments preservation has been scarcely investigated. Many requirements and concerns are involved for
any superficial stone treatment in the field of the preservation of historical-architectural heritage [23, 24]. In particular the assessment of the effects of the TiO2 treatments
in terms of harmfulness with respect to some characteristics of the stones, as colour, water absorption by capillarity,
permeability to water vapour, water wettability is very
important for any further investigation.
The stone substrate considered is a porous calcarenite
named ‘‘pietra leccese’’. This stone is representative of soft
and porous materials used in historical building, widely used
in Southern Italy, as well as in many countries of the
Mediterranean basin. The stone has a carbonatic composition and is mainly made of calcite mineral, with a negligible
insoluble residue. Its structure is characterized by a poor
degree of cementation, with low grain cohesion. This stone
generally shows very high porosity, ranging from 30 to 40%,
while exceeding over 40% in decayed stone [23]. In this
work a porosity of 40% was measured on the samples used
for the experimental tests. Due to these intrinsic characteristics this stone exhibits low durability, being easily affected
by chemical, biological and physical decay. The first phase
of the work deals with the morphological characterisation of
the Titania coatings deposited on the stone using different
products. The harmfulness with respect to colour change,
water absorption by capillarity, permeability to water
vapour, water wettability has been investigated comparing
coated and uncoated stones, as well as the efficacy of the
self-cleaning properties of the treated stone.
To full-fill specific requirements in the field of the
preservation of stone materials of monuments, many tests
123
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
were performed following the specific protocols in this
field, such as Italian Normal Recommendations and UNINormal Standards.
2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of titania sols
Aqueous colloidal suspensions, also named sols, were
prepared from tetrapropyl orthotitanate (TPOT) from
Sigma-Aldrich 97% as TiO2 precursor. For the preparation
of 1 kg of sol 5.7 g Hydrate oxalic acid (Carlo Erba 99.8%)
are dissolved in 957.6 g of deionised water, 37 g of TPOT
are added drop wise. The calculated content of TiO2 from
such a preparation is 1 wt%. A white precipitate is formed
and readily dissolved by stirring and heating in about 2 h.
After this process a TiO2 amorphous sol is obtained. In the
Teflon-lined autoclave (Mars 5, CEM Corporation) amorphous sol are processed for different dwells at the temperature of 125 °C and at the pressure of 3.5 bar. The
heating rate was 2.5 °C/min. The temperature was maintained with the accuracy of ±2 °C. The maximum process
time is fixed at 10 min to prevent the anatase–rutile phase
transformation. Three sols are obtained: HT01 (125 °C,
3.5 bar for 2.5 min) and HT02 (125 °C, 3.5 bar for
10 min), HT03 (185 °C; 13.5 bar; 10 min).
2.2 Application of the coatings on the stone surface
As prepared sols, have been applied on samples of ‘‘pietra
leccese’’. The commercial product (TioxoClean, supplied
by Tioxoclean, Inc.) was applied and compared with the 2
sols. Tioxoclean is a water-based sol containing 1% of
anatase nanoparticles. This product is applied on a wide
range of substrates including glass, metal, wood, plastic,
concrete, and stone. It is coupled with the primer TioxoGuard, strongly recommended by the supplier for the pretreatment, with the aim to protect the substrates from being
degraded by the photocatalytic coating. TioxoGuard is a
water-based solution, containing amorphous titania, that
forms an inactive coating, acting as a barrier. In this work
the coating obtained by the coupled TioxoClean and TioxoGuard products is synthetically named TX.
The stone specimens were cleaned with a soft brush and
washed with deionized water in order to remove dust
deposits. Then they were completely dried by a cyclical
procedure: 22 h in oven at 60 °C, followed by 2 h in a
desiccator with silica gel (relative humidity R.H. =
10 ± 5%) at room temperature. It was assumed that the dry
weight is reached when the difference between two consecutive weighting measures (gathered at 24 h from each
other) is less than 0.1% of the original weight of the
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
439
sample. Before the application of the treatments, the stones
were kept at 23 ± 2 °C, 50 ± 5% R.H. for 24 h.
Each product was applied on 5 specimens of 5 9 5 9
2 cm and 5 specimens of 5 9 5 9 1 cm. Only one 5 9
5 cm side of each sample was treated. Spray coating was
used to apply the titania sols on the stone surface using a
HVLP spray gun with 0.8 mm diameter nozzle. The weight
of each specimen was measured before and after the
treatment to calculate the amount of solution applied.
After the application of the products, the samples were
kept in laboratory at 23 ± 2 °C and 50 ± 5% relative
humidity (R.H.) for 3 days, then they were dried in the
oven at 60 °C until the weight stabilisation was achieved;
the stabilisation was controlled by periodical measurements of weight.
2.3 Tests and analyses
Several tests were carried out in order to assess the
harmfulness and the photocatalytic efficiency of the coatings on the stone.
2.3.1 XRD analysis
XRD analysis were performed on TiO2 powders obtained
from the sols evaporating the water at 60 °C. XRD spectra
were obtained with X-ray Diffractometer (Philips PW1729)
using Cu Ka radiation (k = 1.5406 Å). Crystallite size was
calculated by Sherrer’s equation [25] from the full width at
half maximum (FWHM) of the (101) reflection for anatase
and the (110) reflection of rutile:
d ¼ kk=ðb cos hÞ
ð1Þ
where d is the crystallite size, k is a constant (0.9 assuming
that the particles are spherical), k is the wavelength of the
X-ray radiation, b = FWHM and h is the angle of
diffraction.
The anatase/rutile proportions were measured by the
method of Spurr and Myers [26]:
WA ¼ 1=½1 þ 1:26ðIR =IA Þ
ð2Þ
where WA is the weight share of anatase in the mixture,
while IA and IR are the integrated intensities of the (101)
reflection of anatase and the (110) reflection of rutile.
Photocatalytic activity and self-cleaning test The photocatalytic activity of the coatings was evaluated through
methyl red (Sigma-Aldrich) decomposition under UV
irradiation.
The samples were covered with 470 lL of methyl red
hydro-alcoholic solution with 7.5 9 10-4 mol/L concentration. The solution was applied on both treated and
untreated portions (Fig. 2); coloured samples undergone
drying in the oven and then are irradiated by ultraviolet
rays with an intensity of 37 W/m2 up to 6.5 h. The degradation activity of the TiO2 coatings was evaluated by
colorimetry. The starting colour parameters were taken on
both coated and uncoated samples, and their evolution in
time was estimated.
Photocatalytic NOx oxidation test A flow type photoreactor was used to investigate the NOx degradation capability of the coatings. The samples (5 9 5 9 1 cm3) were
irradiated with a light intensity of 30 W/m2 (Osram Vitalux
lamp) at the photocatalyst surface. Dry air containing
0.6 ppm of NOx (45% NO2 e 55% NO) was passed through
the 3 litres Pyrex reactor at a rate of 5 L/min. The NOx
concentration was monitored with a chemiluminescent
NOx analyzer (Monitor Labs, Model 8440). The NOx
conversion is given by the following ratio:
ð%Þ ¼ ½ðCa Cb Þ=Ca 100
ð3Þ
where Ca is NOx concentration before entering the reactor,
and Cb is the final NOx concentration.
Measurements on natural stone were carried out at different experimental conditions: (1) in the dark without the
sample in the reactor (sealing test), (2) in the dark with the
sample in the reactor (for evaluating the gas adsorption on
the coating), (3) under irradiation with the sample in the
reactor (for evaluating the photooxidation).
The following tests for the assessment of the harmfulness and efficacy of the coatings on the stone surfaces were
performed using the same sample set in order to reduce the
influence of the intrinsic variability of the stone characteristics on the results.
Colorimetry [27] This test was performed with a Minolta
CR 300 Chroma Meter reflectance colorimeter to evaluate
the colour change. The chromatic variations due to the
application of Titania sols were measured in the CIELab
space [28], expressed as:
DE ¼ ½ðDL Þ2 þ ðDa Þ2 þ ðDb Þ2 1=2
ð4Þ
where DL represents the change in brightness, Da and
Db the changes in hue.
Morphological characterisation They have been performed by an ESEM—Mod. XL30 (FEI Company), using a
GSE detector, in low-vacuum modality (pressure: 0.6 torr;
acceleration voltage: 25 kV).
Static contact angle measurement [29] Measurements
were taken with a Costech contact angle measuring
instrument.
Capillarity water absorption [30] This test was performed on 5 samples measuring 5 9 5 9 2 cm. The
123
440
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
weight measurements during the absorption were taken at
10, 20, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 h, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 days.
The amount of absorbed water (Q) was calculated as
follows:
Qi ¼ ðwi w0 Þ=S
ð5Þ
where wi and w0 are the weight of the sample at time ti and
t0, respectively; S is the area of the sample exposed to the
water.
The Capillarity Index (CI) was calculated using the
following equation:
R tf
t ðQi Þdt
CI ¼ 0
ð6Þ
Qtf tf
Rt
where t0f ðQi Þdt represents the area underneath the
absorption curve, Qtf is the amount of water absorbed per
surface unit at the final time (tf) of the test (i.e. 7 days).
The Absorption Coefficient (AC) represents the slope of
the straight part of the absorption curve and it is calculated
as:
AC ¼
Q30 Q0
pffiffiffiffiffi
t30
ð7Þ
where Q30 is the amount of water absorbed per surface unit
at 30 min; Q0 is the intercept of the line in the straight part
of the curve.
Water vapour permeability [31] This test was performed
on 5 samples measuring 5 9 5 9 1 cm.
Permeability to water vapour was calculated as the mass
of the water vapour crossing the stone surface unit in 24 h
and it is expressed as g/m2. The variation in percentage
(DP) of the values measured before and after the treatments
was also evaluated.
3 Results and discussion
The diffraction patterns of HT01 and HT02 and HT03
powders are reported in Fig. 1 and compared with the
patterns from calcined TiO2 powders cured at 400 °C. In
Table 1 the processing conditions, the average crystalline
size and the phase composition of the powders prepared by
hydrothermal process are summarised and compared with
the properties of calcined TiO2 powders.
From the XRD patterns the influence of the hydrothermal process on the crystallisation of TiO2 powder can be
clearly evaluated. From room temperature up to 185 °C,
the anatase and rutile peaks result intensified and sharpened
significantly with increasing curing temperature and time.
The reaction duration reduces the anatase/rutile weight
fraction whereas no significant changes in the average
123
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of low temperature titania powders prepared by
hydrothermal process
Table 1 Microstructural properties of TiO2 solutions
Sample
Processing
conditions
Particles
size,
nm (±10%)
Phase composition
of synthesized
samples
HT01
125 °C; 3.5 bar;
2.5 min
3.2
Anatase 66.5%
HT02
125 °C; 3.5 bar;
10 min
3.7
Anatase 53.5%
HT03
185 °C; 13.5 bar;
10 min
5.8
Anatase 27%
Calcined
TiO2
400 °C; 1 bar;
2h
8.3
Anatase-80%
Rutile 33.5%
Rutile 46.5%
Rutile 73%
Rutile 20%
Table 2 Amounts of products applied on stone surfaces
Deposited
TiO2 (g/m2)
Product
Amount of solution
applied (g/m2)
HT01
144.4 ± 14.4
2.888 ± 0.288
HT02
56.8 ± 10.4
1.136 ± 0.208
TioxoGuard
156.0 ± 29.2
TioxoClean
133.6 ± 16.8
1.336 ± 0.168
crystal sizes have been found. Above 185 °C polycrystalline TiO2 is mainly composed by rutile phase.
The titania coating is applied by spraying the sols. The
corresponding amount of TiO2 deposited was calculated
from the amount of the applied solutions since the weight
concentration of TiO2 in the sols is known. In Table 2 the
solutions sprayed and the corresponding amount of TiO2
deposited on the stone surface are listed. They are
expressed as the mean values calculated on 10 specimens;
the standard deviation is also reported.
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
441
Table 3 Colorimetric data of the stone samples before and after the application of the coatings
Uncoated samples
Mean value
SD
L
a
b
L
a
b
77.82
2.156
16.787
79.202
1.8412
14.593
0.87
0.09
0.42
0.83
Uncoated samples
Mean value
SD
SD
0.10
L
a
b
L
77.116
2.185
16.838
78.078
0.98
0.13
0.68
0.72
DE
a
b
1.9798
15.281
0.07
2.61
0.71
HT02 coated samples
Uncoated samples
Mean value
DE
HT01 coated samples
1.85
0.49
DE
TX coated samples
L
a
b
L
a
b
78.09
2.066
16.438
77.726
2.071
17.419
0.76
0.06
0.37
0.77
0.04
0.36
1.06
Fig. 2 Morphology of the coatings observed by ESEM a HT02, b 2 wt% HT01, c 1 wt% HT01, d morphology of the TX coating observed by
ESEM
The results of colour changes DE on the coated and
uncoated stone are showed in Table 3. The values of DE
show negligible variations before and after the application
of all the three different TiO2 products. Their entity is below
the minimum value that human eye could appreciates.
The morphology of the coating is greatly influenced by
the amount of solution sprayed.
The relationship between sol gel derived film cracking
and film thickness has been studied experimentally by
many authors. A critical film thickness below which films
is crack-free is generally observed; it is dependent on
material properties and experimental condition. For films
thicker than this critical thickness the crack spacing was
approximately ten times the film thickness. The phenomena
is generally explained by different forms of relaxation of
the stress in the vicinity of a crack through the film [32].
With reference to the amounts of solution reported in
Table 2, discontinuous coating and microcracks, whose
dimensions measure until 1 micron (Fig. 2a, b) are formed
when titania concentration in the sol equals or exceeds 2
123
442
Fig. 3 Capillarity water absorption curves of stone samples before
and after the application of the TiO2 products. a HT01, b HT02, c TX
wt%. Additionally, widespread microblisters, with average
dimension of 450 nm in diameter, are evident in the
coating obtained by the HT01 product.
Homogenous and compact coatings are obtained by
applying sols with 1 wt% (Fig. 2c).
The coating with the TX treatment show a film with the
homogeneous and compact distribution, which is characterised by lamellae texture (Fig. 2d).
123
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
Due to its intrinsic characteristics, the water absorption
by the uncoated stone is very high and rapid and no drop is
formed on its surface. For this reason the static contact
angle cannot be measured; it still remained not measurable
also on the stone treated with titania sols, as expected for
the well-known hydrophilic character of the titania treatments. In Fig. 3a–c the curves of the water absorption are
reported as a function of the square root of the time. No
significant difference can be observed between the treated
and untreated samples. All the samples analysed show the
most water uptake during the first hour.
In Table 4 the mean values of the maximum absorbed
water (Q) with the standard deviation are reported. The
values of the capillarity index (CI) and the absorption
coefficient (AC) are also summarised.
The amount of the water absorbed and the capillary
index still remain unchanged after the application of the
three coating products. A very small decrease is observed
only in the case of the TX with regard to the kinetics of the
absorption, which corresponds to a lower value of the
absorption coefficient.
In Table 5 the water vapour permeability is illustrated.
Data are expressed as the mean of the permeability values
measured before (Pb) and after the treatment (Pa), as well
as percentage variation (DP); standard deviation is also
reported.
Small decreases in water vapour permeability are
observed after the application of the coatings, although
their entities do not involve a negative performance of the
products.
The results of the colour measurements for the evaluation of the photocatalytic activity of the products are
illustrated in Table 6, in terms of difference between the
chromatic parameters of the samples with methyl red
before and after the UV irradiation, with reference to the
samples without TiO2 coating. The analysis of the colorimetric data shows that the efficacy of the degradation of the
methyl red is related to noticeable variations of the a
parameter. HT01 coatings have the best photocatalytic
activity and the higher difference between the initial and
the final a values.
In Fig. 4 the a values are reported as a function of the
radiating time. It is evident the fast degradation rate of the
methyl red during the first hour. The better self cleaning
ability of the stone covered by TiO2 sols is evident by the
comparison with the a curve of the methyl red directly
applied on the stone, without TiO2 coatings; this curve
shows a constant rate of degradation during the whole test
and a lower final variation of the a . In Fig. 5a, the NOx
removal under UV irradiation is reported as function a of
the irradiation time during the NOx degradation tests. The
experimental apparatus for the NOx control was the same
as used by Takeuchi [33]. The photocatalytic activity has
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
443
Table 4 Parameters related to the capillarity absorption test
Coating
product
Q (mg/cm2)
b.t.
AC (mg/(cm2 s1/2))
CI
a.t.
b.t.
a.t.
b.t.
a.t.
HT01
580 ± 36
582 ± 35
0.9
0.9
9.7
9.5
HT02
592 ± 17
593 ± 17
0.9
0.9
10.9
10.9
TX
598 ± 25
598 ± 21
0.9
0.9
10.1
9.4
Key Q maximum absorbed water, CI capillarity index, AC absorption
coefficient, b.t. before treatment, a.t. after treatment
Table 5 Water vapour permeability
Product
Pb ((g/m2) 24 h)
Pa ((g/m2) 24 h)
DP (%)
-10 ± 5
HT01
262 ± 13
236 ± 13
HT02
251 ± 14
229 ± 2
-7 ± 3
TX
258 ± 14
233 ± 13
-6 ± 3
Table 6 Chromatic variations of the samples before and after the
self-cleaning test
HT01
HT02
TX
Without TiO2
DE
12.92
10.57
9.97
7.90
Da
-10.20
-8.67
-7.99
-6.16
Db
4.69
2.88
2.47
2.21
DL
6.39
5.31
5.43
4.42
Fig. 5 a NOx removal in percent from a starting concentration of
0.6 ppm, b NO abatement in percent
NO is converted to HNO3 with photo oxidation by way
of NO2.
hm
NO þ 1=2O2 ! NO2
hm
2NO2 þ 1=2O2 þ H2 O ! 2HNO3
NO is almost completely removed after 60 min by samples
HT01 and TX.
Both NOx and NO abatement curves confirm the higher
photocatalytic activity of the sample containing more
anatase whose efficiency is comparable with TX sample.
Fig. 4 Evolution of the self-cleaning power by the a change as
function of UV exposure
4 Conclusions
been found in any of the investigated coating type. After
60 min UV irradiation NOx concentration is reduced of
90% in all the experiments. As shown in Fig. 5, the NOx
removal of sample HT01 and TX is faster and similar.
HT02 exhibits a slower efficiency.
The trends in NOx removal is confirmed with the NO
concentration measurements (Fig. 5b).
Under proper processing conditions, photocatalytic coatings on limestone with selfcleaning and antipollution
properties can be obtained without any thermal annealing
of the stone. Crystallised titania nanoparticles suspended in
water were preliminary obtained by sol–gel and hydrothermal combined process and applied by spray coating.
123
444
The spray coating process represents a practical, cheap
process to apply TiO2 coating without significantly
changing the morphology and permeability of the porous
limestone. This process successfully meets the specific
requirements for the surface engineering of natural stone.
Both anatase and rutile phases can be obtained and
controlled with hydrothermal process by varying pressure,
temperature and time. Selfcleaning tests and NOx removal
prove that anatase phase is more active so that short heating
at relatively low temperature in autoclave is effective to
transform a well dispersed and amorphous titania sol into
an active crystalline photocatalytic phase.
The coatings do not alter the colour of the stone, its
water adsorption and vapour permeability. This is a necessary condition for the applicability of stone treatments in
the field of the Cultural Heritage. Positive results were also
achieved by the treated stones in terms of self cleaning
properties.
Acknowledgments Funding for this work has been provided by
Regione Puglia (Research Project ‘‘Protection, consolidation and
cleaning of stones characteristic of Apulia region: experimental
analysis of environmental friendly products and monitoring of the
treatments’’, POR 2000–2006).
References
1. Shapovalov VI (2010) Glass Phys Chem 36(2):121–157
2. Zielinska B, Grzechulska J, Grzmil B, Morawski AW (2001)
Appl Catal B Environ 35:L1–L7
3. Ohtani B, Ogawa Y, Nishimoto S (1997) J Phys Chem B
101:3746–3752
4. Kumar SR, Suresh C, Vasudevan KA, Suja NR, Mukundan P,
Warrier KGK (1999) Mater Lett 38:161–166
5. Pabon E, Retuert J, Quijiada R, Zarate A (2004) Micropor
Mesopor Mater 67:195–203
6. Fu X, Clark LA, Yang Q, Anderson MA (1996) Environ Sci
Technol 30:647–653
7. Dagan G, Sampath S, Lev O (1995) Chem Mater 7:446–453
8. Anderson C, Bard AJ (1995) J Phys Chem 99:9882–9885
9. Doolin PK, Alerasool S, Zalewski DJ, Hoffman JF (1994) Catal
Lett 25:209–212
10. Khouw CB, Dartt CB, Labinger JA, Davis ME (1994) J Catal
149:195–205
11. Reddy BM, Reddy EP, Manohar B (1993) Appl Catal A Gen
96:L1–L5
12. Stakheev AY, Shpiro ES, Apijok J (1993) J Phys Chem 97:
5668–5672
13. Gun’ko VM, Zarko VI, Turov VV, Leboda R, Chibowski E,
Holysz L, Pakhlov EM, Voronin EF, Dudnik VV, Gornikov YI
(1998) J Colloid Interface Sci 198:141–156
123
J Sol-Gel Sci Technol (2011) 60:437–444
14. Li Z, Hou B, Xu Y, Wu D, Sun Y, Hu W, Deng F (2005) J Solid
State Chem 178:1395–1405
15. Kolen’ko YV, Maximov VD, Garshev AV, Meskin PE, Oleynikov NN, Churagulov BR (2004) Chem Phys Lett 388:411–415
16. Kolen’ko YV, Churagulov BR, Kunst M, Mazerolles L, ColbeauJustin C (2004) Appl Catal B Environ 54:51–58
17. Winkler EM (1994) Stone in architecture: properties, durability,
3rd edn. Springer, Berlin
18. Horie CV (1987) Materials for conservation. Butterworth-Heinemann, London
19. Mills A, Hodgen S, Lee SK (2005) Res Chem Intermed 31:
295–308
20. Vallée F, Ruot B, Bonafous L, Guillot L, Pimpinelli N, Cassar L,
Strini A, Mapelli E, Schiavi L, Gobin C, André H, Moussiopoulos
N, Papadopoulos A, Bartzis J, Maggos T, McIntyre R, LehautBurnouf C, Henrichsen A, Laugesen P, Amadelli R, Kotzias D,
Pichat P (2004) Cementitious materials for self-cleaning and depolluting facade surfaces. In: Kashino N, Ohama Y (eds) International RILEM symposium on environmental-conscious materials
and systems for sustainable development. RILEM publications
S.a.r.l, Bagneux, pp 337–346
21. Karatasios I, Katsiotis MS, Likodimos V, Kontos AI, Papavassiliou G, Falaras P, Kilikoglou V (2010) Appl Catal B Environ
1–2:78–86
22. Tobaldi DM, Tucci A, Camera-Roda G, Baldi G, Esposito L
(2008) J Eur Ceram Soc 28:2645–2652
23. Zezza F, Garcia Pascua N, Macrı̀ F (1996) Rising damp and
soluble salts in the weathering process of biocalcarenites: case
study of cathedrals, churches and buildings of Leccese baroque.
In: Pancella R (ed) Proceedings of the 1995 LCP congress on
preservation and restoration of cultural heritage, Lausanne,
pp 161–174
24. Appolonia L, Fassina V, Matteoli U, Mecchi AM, Nugari AP,
Pinna D, Peruzzi R, Scala A, Tiano P (1995) Methodology for the
evaluation of protective products for stone materials. Part II:
experimental tests on treated samples. In: Preprints of the international colloquium ‘‘Methods of evaluating products for the
conservation of porous building materials in monuments’’. ICCROM, Rome, pp 301–316
25. Cullity BD (1978) Elements of X-ray diffraction, 2nd edn.
Addison-Wesley, Reading, p 102
26. Spurr RA, Myers H (1957) Anal Chem 29:760–762
27. NORMAL Rec. 43/93, Misure colorimetriche di superfici opache,
CNR/ICR, Rome, 1993
28. CIE Standard S014-4/E:2007, Colorimetry—Part 4: CIE 1976
L*a*b* Colour Space, 2007
29. NORMAL Rec. 33/89, Misura dell’angolo di contatto, CNR/ICR,
Rome, 1989
30. UNI 10859, Determinazione dell’assorbimento d’acqua per capillarità, UNI, Milan, 2000
31. NORMAL Rec. 21/85, Permeabilità al vapor d’acqua, CNR/ICR,
Rome, 1985
32. Atkinson A, Guppy RM (1991) J Mater Sci 26:3869–3873
33. Negishi N, Takeuchi K, Ibusuki T (1998) J Sol Gel Sci Technol
13:691–694