Non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG): When and where to apply

Objective: To use a comparative cost-effectiveness approach with evidence from four countries to understand which facility level is most appropriate for implementing the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment (NASG) to decrease maternal mortality associated with obstetric hemorrhage (OH). Methods: Two data sources were compared. We determined the cost-effectiveness of NASG application for women with hypovolemic shock from OH at the referral hospitals (RH) compared to standard of care within a two-phase intervention study of 6 RH in Egypt and Nigeria. To specify the cost-effectiveness of applying the NASG at the primary health clinic (PHC) level compared to the RH, we estimated random-effects models within a cluster-randomized control trial of 38 primary health clinics (PHC) in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Costs (blood transfusions, medications, etc.) and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were compared across the intervention scenarios. Results: The NASG was cost saving ($77-85 per woman in E...