zyxwvuts
zyxwvuts
zyxwvutsrqpon
zyxwvut
zyxwvut
J . Fish Biol. (1 987) 31,5 17-543
A key to the species of cestodes (tapeworms) parasitic in
British and Irish freshwater fishes
zyxwv
J. C. CHUBB*,
D. W. POOLANDC.
J. VELTKAMP
Deportment of’Zoology, University of’liverpool, P . 0 .Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX.
England
(Received 22 January 1987, Accepted 20 February 1987)
Methods for the collection, fixation. preservation and examination of the cestodes parasitic in
British freshwater fishes are described. An illustrated key to the species is provided, with the
exception of the members of the genus Proreoccphalus. for which the information is tabulated.
I. INTRODUCTION
Thirty-three species of cestodes from six orders have been recorded as adults or
larvae from freshwater fishes in the British Isles. Two of these identifications
were regarded as dubious by the respective authors (Caryophyllaeus jimbriceps,
Kennedy, 1974; Proteocephalus parallacticus, Arme & Ingham, 1972). We include
these two species in the key, although we have no additional evidence to confirm
the determinations. Those species of cestodes found in marine fishes which
migrate into brackish or fresh waters are included in the key, except for ‘ Scolex
pleuronectis ’ (see Discussion).
Identification of the cestodes of freshwater fishes in the British Isles is generally a
straightforward procedure. However, it has been made complicated and timeconsuming by the need to use foreign texts which contain species not occurring in
the British Isles (e.g. Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya et al., 1962). In addition, many of
the line drawings of the scolices of the cestodes in existing keys lack realism, which
can impede accurate identification. The aim of the present paper is to remedy this
by providing scanning electron microscope (SEM)photographs of a representative
individual of each species and a checklist of the species known to occur in the
British Isles. In most instances the cestodes can be identified by scolex morphology
together with knowledge of the species of host. Where additional morphological
information is necessary, as for example to separate Bathybothrium rectangulum
from Bothriocephalus acheilognathi, we have provided this. However, we have not
attempted to include comprehensive morphological descriptions of each species.
Except in a few instances, we have avoided reference to size of the cestodes, as this is
influenced by the age and dimensions of the host (Davydov, 1978), the species of
host (Read & Voge, 1954; Freze, 1977), the intensity of infection (Pavlovski &
Gnezdilov, 1949) and the state of contraction or relaxation of the parasite (Pool &
Chubb, 1985).
Where taxonomic problems are unresolved, or where we suspect they may exist,
they are indicated at the relevant point in the discussion. We have adopted a
zyxw
*For correspondence.
517
0022-1 I12/87/010517+27$03.00/0
0 1987 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
518
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwv
zyxwvutsrq
J . C . CHUBB ET A L .
dichotomous format for the key, with the exception of the species within the genus
Profeocephalus, where the information for differentiation of the species is
presented in tabular form.
zyxw
11. MATERIALS AND METHODS
PREPARATION OF MATERIALS
Whenever possible, fishes should be examined freshly killed. At autopsy the contents of
the stomach, pyloric caeca and intestine lumen should be examined for adult cestodes.
Larval stages may occur free in the body cavities or be encapsulated within the tissue of a
wide variety of organs of the fish. The scolex and anterior parts of the strobila of living
cestodes are often highly mobile. Differing fixation procedures can, as a consequence,
induce a high degree of variation in form (Pool & Chubb, 1985). It is, therefore, important
to adopt a standardized procedure for relaxation and fixation of worms in order to obtain
consistent results. We recommend that the living adult cestodes should be removed from
the alimentary tract, relaxed in distilled water at 10" C for either 60 min or until movement
has ceased, and then fixed in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde solution for at least 24 h. In
this way, extremes ofcontraction or relaxation are avoided. Larval cestodes are treated in a
similar manner after they have been freed from host tissues; relaxation may take a much
longer time than for adult worms, but a close watch should be kept on the specimens, as
excessive relaxation may result in the partial sloughing of the tegument.
EXAMINATION OF T H E SCOLEX
Using a binocular microscope, the three-dimensional structure of the scolex can be seen
in all but the smallest species. Better detail can be obtained, if necessary, using an SEM,
although this will rarely be essential for identification.
In this key, SEM photographs are presented because they demonstrate a degree of
realism unobtainable by any other method. The specimens were fixed as described above.
They were then washed in distilled water, dehydrated in an ethanol series, critical-pointdried in carbon dioxide using a Polaron E3000, and sputter-coated in a Polaron E5 I00 using
60% gold/palladium. They were viewed in a Philips 501B SEM at 7.2 kV. Subsequent
decoating of specimens can be achieved in acetone if necessary.
zyx
EXAMINATION OF T H E STROBILA
Differentiation of Bathybothrium rectangulum and Bothriocephalus acheilognathi is facilitated by examination of the arrangement of the genitalia within the proglottis. These two
species are readily separated by the position of the vitelline glands, which are visible in
material fixed in neutral buffered formaldehyde as described above. 1'0facilitate examination, whole worms or pieces of strobila are transferred sequentially from fixative to distilled water, 30%, 50% and 70% ethanol, and finally to a mixture of 3 parts 70% ethanol
to 1 part pure glycerine. The ethanol is allowed to evaporate, leaving the cleared materials
in glycerine. If required, mounts can be made in glycerine jelly and ringed to provide
reasonable permanence.
To demonstrate fuller details of cestode genitalia in a whole mount, for examination
using optical microscopy, the technique of Schnur (1969) is recommended. This relatively
straightforward procedure, using methylene blue stain, has been found to be effective for a
wide variety of cestodes. It is especially useful for members of the genus Proteocephalus,
where the size and position of the cirrus sac and the numbers of testes are important for
identification.
111. CHECK LIST OF SPECIES OF CESTODES KNOWN TO OCCUR
IN BRITAIN AND IRELAND
The species are arranged alphabetically within each order. An asterisk indicates
that the author who found this species in the British Isles expressed doubts concerning identification. Species found as larval stages in fishes are indicated as such;
zyxwvutsr
zyxw
zyxw
zyxw
zyxwvuts
A K E Y TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
519
all other species occur as adults in fishes. Species of marine origin, but found in
fishes in fresh waters, are noted.
Order Caryophyllidea van Beneden in Carus, 1863
Archigetes sieboldi Leuckart, 1878
Caryophyllaeidesjennica (Schneider, 1902)
Caryophyllueus laticeps (Pallas, 1781)
* Carq’ophyllaeus,fimbriceps Annenkova-Khlopina, 1919
Order Spathebothriidea Wardle and McLeod, 1952
Cyathocephalus truncatus (Pallas, 1781)
Order Trypanorhyncha Diesing, 1863
Heputoxylon squali (Martin, 1797), larval, marine origin
Order Pseudophyllidea Carus, 1863
Buthybothrium rectangulum (Bloch, 1782)
Bothriocephulus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934
B. cluuiceps (Goeze, 1782)
Diphyllohothrium dentriticuni (Nitzsch, 1824), larval
D. ditremum (Creplin, 1825), larval
D. latum (Linnaeus, 1758), larval
*D. vogeli Kuhlow, 1953, larval
Eubothrium crassum (Bloch, 1779)
E. frugilis (Rudolphi, 1802), marine origin
E. suluelini (Schrank, 1790)
Ligula intestinalis (Linnaeus, 1758), larval
Schistocephalus pungitii Dubinina, 1959, larval
S. solidus (Miiller, 1776), larval
Triaenophorus nodulosus (Pallas, 178I ) , larval and adult
Order Tetraphyllidea Carus, 1863
‘ Scolex pleuronectis ’ Muller, 1788, larval, marine origin: see Discussion
Order Proteocephalidea Mola, 1928
Proteocephalus ambiguus (Dujardin, 1845)
P. cernua (Gmelin, 1790)
P. exiguus La Rue, 191 1
P.jlicollis (Rudolphi, 1802)
P. macrocephalus (Creplin, 1825)
P. neglectus La Rue 1911
P. ocellatus (Rudolphi, 1802) [nec P. percae (Muller, 1780)]
P. osculatus (Goeze, 1782)
* P. parallacticus MacLulich, 1943
P. pollanicola Gresson, 1952
P. sagittus (Grimm, 1872)
P. torulosus (Batsch, 1786)
520
zyxwvuts
zyxwvut
zyxw
J. C . CHUBB E T A L .
Order Cyclophyllidea van Beneden in Braun, 1900
Valipora cumpyluncristrota (Wedl, 1855), larval
[ = Dilepis unilateralis (Krabbe, 1869)]
1V. KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES PARASITIC IN BRITISH
AND IRISH FRESHWATER FISHES
1. Parasitic in body cavity, viscera (other than lumen of intestine) or
musculature. Genitalia, if present, not mature
Larval cestodes
2
Parasitic in lumen of intestine (or pyloric caeca, if present). Genitalia
usually evident unless worms juvenile. In gravid specimens eggs usually
clearly visible
Adult cestodes
11
zyxwvu
LARVAL CESTODES
2. Larvae less than 1 mm long. Scolex with four suckers and an armed
rostellum of two circles of hooks, 10 large (20-29 pm long) and 10 small
(9-10 pm long)
Valipora campylancristrota
(Figs 1,2). Cysticercoid (cercoscolex of Jarecka, 1970) in lumen of
the gall bladder of carp Cyprinus carpio L. (Dearsley et al., 1982).
Rostellum often retracted (Fig. 2). Adult tapeworms in intestine of
heron Ardea cinerea L. Probably widespread, despite few British
records so far.
Larvae more than 1 mm long, scolex without four suckers or an armed
rostellum
3
3. Found free in body cavity or entangled with alimentary viscera. Scolex
4
domed, but hardly visible at low magnifications ( x 10)
Found encapsulated in or attached to alimentary viscera or in musculature.
Scolex not domed, usually readily visible at low magnifications ( x 10)
6
4. Scolex dome clearly bisected by a furrow when viewed apically at high
magnification ( x 400). Annulation ( =segmentation) as broken circles, not
concurrent with proglottis rudiments
Ligula intestinalis
(Figs 3,4). Plerocercoid parasitic in body cavity of cyprinid fishes.
Copepods are first intermediate hosts, piscivorous birds or
mammals definitive hosts. Widespread throughout British Isles,
often locally abundant but sporadic in occurrence.
Scolex dome not bisected when viewed apically. Annulation as complete
circles, concurrent with proglottis rudiments
5
5 . Shoulder of first annulation curved along its length (see three arrows in
Fig. 6). Parasite of Pungitius pungitius
Schistocephalus pungitii
(Figs 5 , 6). Plerocercoid in body cavity of ten-spined stickleback,
P. pungitius (L.). Copepods are first intermediate hosts, piscivorous
birds or mammals definitive hosts. Few records in Britain or
Ireland to date, but distribution probably coincident with that of
P. pungitius. Formerly confused with S. solidus.
z
zyxwvutsr
A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
52 1
zyxwvutsrqponmlk
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwvu
FIG.I . Vuliporu cumpy/uneris/rutu. Anterior part oflarva with rostellum extended to show hooks. Note two
circles of large and small hooks, respectively (arrowed). Host: carp, Cyprinus curpio. Scale bar
0.1 mm.
FIG.2. Vuliporu cutnpylnncristro/u. Whole larva, incompletely relaxed with rostellum withdrawn. Two
suckers visible (arrowed). Scale bar 0.1 mm.
FIG.3. Ligulu intestinalis. Anterior part of plerocercoid, showing scolex cone and annulation as broken
circles (arrowed). Hosts: Cyprinidae. Scale bar 1 mm.
Shoulder of first annulation nearly straight-edged (see three arrows in Fig.
8). Parasite of Gasterosteus aculeatus
Schistocephalus solidus
(Figs 7,8). Plerocercoid in body cavity of three-spined stickleback,
C. aculeafus L. Copepods are first intermediate hosts, piscivorous
522
zyxwvu
J . C. C H U B B ET A L .
zy
zyxwv
A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
6.
7.
8.
9.
523
birds or mammals definitive hosts. Widespread throughout British
Isles, coincident with G. aculeatus. Often locally abundant, but
sporadic in occurrence.
Scolex with four three-pronged hooks and two shallow bothria (adhesive
depressions)
Triaenophorusnodulosus
(Fig. 9). Plerocercoid encapsulated by host-response tissue, normally in liver, less commonly other viscera. Principal host for
plerocercoid in British Isles is perch, PercaJIuviatilis L. Copepods
are first intermediate hosts. Adult worms in intestine lumen of pike,
Esox lucius L. Widespread, but only in waters containing E. lucius.
Scolex lacking three-pronged hooks
7
Scolex with four, spinous tentacles and two bothridia (also adhesive
depressions)
Hepaloxylon squali
(Fig. lo). Plerocercoid larvae attached to viscera or musculature of
salmon, Salmo salar L. Infections acquired and established at sea.
Adult worms parasitic in intestine of marine selachians. Larvae
reported sporadically in British Isles from S. salar caught during
spawning migration into fresh waters.
Scolex without armed tentacles
8
Scolex not extended after relaxation of living worm in cold water for about
1 h; hence, the two bothria of the scolex remain concealed by forebody of
plerocercoid. Parasitic in somatic musculature, but may be encapsulated in
viscera
Diphyllobothrium latum
(Fig. 11). Plerocercoid very annulated, at least under SEM. Free in
somatic musculature of Esox lucius and PercaJIuviatilisbut may be
encapsulated in viscera. Copepods are first intermediate hosts.
Adult worms endemic in man in Ireland, and formerly frequently
reported. Recent records in Britain from immigrants.
Scolex becomes extended after relaxation of living worm in cold water for
about 1 h, thus the two bothria of scolex are readily visible. Usually encapsulated in viscera ( D . dendriticum, D. ditremum) or in liver ( D . vogeli)
9
Bothria wide open after relaxation of plerocercoid (Fig. 12). Annulation
usually clearly apparent immediately behind scolex
Diphyllobothrium dendriticum
(Fig. 12). Plerocercoids encapsulated in or on viscera. Common,
with D. ditremum, in Salmonidae, less frequently Thymallidae,
Coregonidae and Gasterosteidae. Frequent in montane lakes.
Copepods are first intermediate hosts. Gulls (Laridae) appear to be
z
zyxwvu
FIG.4. Ligulu inresrinulis. Apical view of scolex. Note division into two parts (arrowed). Scale bar I mm.
zy
FIG.5. Schisfocephulus pungirii. Lateral view of anterior end of plerocercoid. Note complete annulation.
Scolex arrowed. Host: ten-spined stickleback, Pungitiuspungifius. Scale bar I mm.
FIG.6. Schisfocephulus pungifii. Apical view of scolex. Note shoulder of first annulation curved along its
length (three arrows). Scale bar I mm.
524
zyxwvutsrq
zyxwv
zyxwv
J . C . CHUBB ET A L .
zy
zyxwvut
Frc. 7 . Schistocephulicy solidus. Anterior end of plerocercoid. Note complete annulation. Scolex arrowed.
Host: three-spined stickleback, Gasterosieus aculeatus. Scale bar I mm.
FIG. 8. Schisfocephalus solidus. Apical view of scolex. Note shoulder of first annulation nearly straight-
edged (three arrows). Scale bar I mm.
natural definitive hosts in British Isles, but piscivorous mammals or
man can also act as hosts.
Bothria more or less slit-like after relaxation of plerocercoid. (Figs 13, 14,
15). No annulation apparent immediately behind scolex
10
zyxwvutsrq
zyxw
A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
525
zyxwvutsrqp
zy
FIG.9. Triaenophorusnodulosus. Anterior end of plerocercoid. Note bothrium (B) and the protruding tips
of the three-pronged hooks (arrowed). Host: perch, Percaj7uviatilis; less commonly other fishes. See
also Fig. 21. Scale bar 0.5 rnm.
FIG.10. Heparoxylon squuli. Anterior end of plerocercoid. Note the four spinous tentacles and bothridium
(arrowed). Host: salmon, Salmo salar. Scale bar I mm.
526
J. C. CHUBB ETAL.
zyxwv
zyxwvutsrqponmlk
zyxw
zyxwvu
FIG.I I . Diphylluborhriumlutum. Anterior end of plerocercoid. Note scolex (arrowed) still retracted within
forebody of larva. Hosts: pike, Esuw lucius, perch, Percufluviutilis. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIG.12. Diphylluborhrium dendriricum. Anterior end of relaxed plerocercoid. Note wide open bothria
and annulation immediately behind scolex (both arrowed). Hosts: Salmonidae, Coregonidae,
Thymallidae, Gasterosteidae. Scale bar 0.5 mm.
zyx
FIG.13. Diphylloborhrium dirremum. Scolex and neck of plerocercoid. Note slit-like bothria widening
slightly towards the anterior of the scolex, absence of annulation behind scolex, and distinct neck.
Hosts: Salmonidae, Coregonidae, Thymallidae, Gasterosteidae. Scale bar I mm.
10. Scolex opaque-white, contrasting with translucent body of plerocercoid,
after relaxation, and when fixed in formaldehyde. A distinct neck usually
separates scolex from body of the larva (Fig. 13)
Diphyllobothrium ditremum
(Fig. 13). Plerocercoids encapsulated in or on viscera. Common,
with D. dentriticum, in Salmonidae, less frequently Thymallidae,
zyxwvutsr
zyxw
zyxwvu
A K E Y TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
527
Coregonidae and Gasterosteidae. Frequent in montane lakes.
Cormorants, Phalacrocorax carbo carbo (L.), appear to be natural
definitive hosts in Britain and Ireland.
Scolex and body of plerocercoid neither of contrasting opacity nor
separated by a distinct neck (Fig. 14)
Diphyllobothrium vogeli
(Figs 14, 15). Plerocercoids usually in liver tissue of Gasterosteus
aculeatus. Few records for Britain, none for Ireland, perhaps owing
to confusion with other species of Diphyllobothrium. Adult worms
in gulls (Laridae).
ADULT CESTODES
zy
zy
zy
1 1. Worms with single set of genitalia (monozoic). Body lacking annulation (=
segmentation)
12
Worms with serially arranged, multiple sets of genitalia (proglottids). Body
(strobila) with external annulation (=segmentation) which may or may not
coincide with proglottids
15
12. Scolex blunt, with shallow bothria. Small worms, about 2-3 mm long when
mature
Arch ige tes sieb oldi
(Fig. 16). Normally matures and completes life cycle in tubificid
oligochaete, although it has been recorded from roach, Rutilus
rutilus (L). See Discussion for other species of Archigetes found as
adults in oligochaetes in the British Isles.
Scolex blunt or fan-like, without bothria. Gravid worms usually 5 mm or
longer
13
13. Scolex blunt, without any obvious external features
Caryophyllaeides.fennica
(Fig. 17). Parasite of intestine of Cyprinidae, especially Rutilus
rutilus. Widespread occurrence where cyprinids are present.
Intermediate host Stylaria lacustris (L.) (Oligochaeta). Ovary an
inverted A-shape.
14
Scolex fan like, often wider than body
14. Anterior margin of scolex with lobes or indentations more or less in one
plane when contracted or relaxed. Long constricted neck present
Caryophyllaeus laticeps
(Fig. 18). Parasite of bream, Abramis brama (L.), Rutilus rutilus and
less frequently other Cyprinidae. Tubificid worms are intermediate
hosts. Ovary an H-shape. Widespread.
Anterior margin of scolex deeply scalloped in three dimensions. Neck
constriction absent
Caryophyllaeus fimbriceps
(Fig. 19). Recorded from barbel, Barbus barbus (L.), and dace,
Leuciscus leuciscus (L,), by Kennedy (1974), who expressed doubt
about the identification. We have been unable to obtain material
of this species, so figure the original drawing of the scolex from
Annenkova-Khlopina (1919).
528
zyxwvutsrq
16
J . C. CHUBB ET AL.
17
-V
zyxw
zyxwvutsrq
zy
zyx
FIG.14. Diphylloborhrium vogeli. Lateral view of scolex and forebody of plerocercoid. Note slit-like bothria
and absence of both annulation and distinct neck behind scolex. Host: three-spined stickleback,
Gasrerosteusaculearus. Scale bar I mm.
FIG.15. Diphylloborhrium vogeli. Apical view of scolex. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIG.16. Archigetes sieboldi. Whole worm in the oligochaete host. Note scolex with bothrium (arrowed).
Eggs can be clearly seen in the uterus. Hosts: Limnoddus spp., Cyprinidae. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIG. 17. Curyophyllaeides ,fennica. Note blunt scolex (arrowed) without any external features. Hosts:
Cyprinidae. Scale bar 1 mm.
A
zyxwvuts
zyxwv
zyxw
KEY T O THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
529
zyxwvutsrqpo
FIG.18. Curw)phy//uru.r/u/iwps. Note rounded lobes and indentations of scolex more or less in one plane.
Hosts: Cyprinidnc. Scale bar I mm.
zyxwvutsrq
FIG.19. f r r r ~ u p / ~ ~ f / u ~ u s , f ~Drawing
~ ~ i c ~ , (enlarged
p.s.
from Annenkova-Khlopina, 1919)of scolex to show
deep scalloping in three dimensions. Hosts: Cyprinidae. Scale bar 1 mm (estimated).
FIG.20. C~~tr//roc.ep/iaha
/runculus. Funnel-like scolex (arrowed). Hosts: Salmonidae, occasionally other
lishes. Scale bar I mm.
FIG.21. Triumophorus nodu/osus. Apical view of scolex. Note tips of the three-pronged hooks (arrowed).
Scc also Fig. 9. Host: pike, Esox lucius. Scale bar 0.25 mm.
15. Scolex funnel-like
Cyathocephalus truncatus
(Fig. 20). Parasitic in pyloric caeca of Salmonidae, occasionally
grayling, Thymallus thymallus (L.), eel, Anguillu anguilla (L.),
Eso.u lucius, stone loach, Noemacheilus barbatula (L.),and Perca
,fluviatilis. Procercoids (caudate adults, Freeman, 1973) in
haemocoel of Gammurus pulex (L.). Widespread in streams with
populations of G. pulex.
Scolex not funnel-like
16
16. Scolex with four three-pronged hooks, their bases embedded in tissue
530
zyxwvuts
zyxwvuts
zyxwvu
J. C. CHUBB E T A L .
zyxwvuts
FIG.22. Earhyborhriurn recrungulurn. Scolex to show absence of apical disc and open bothria (both
arrowed). Host: barbel, Earbus burbur. Scale bar 1 mm.
FIG.23. Earhyborhrium recrungulum. Proglottids showing laterally placed vitelline glands (arrowed). Scale
bar I mm.
FIG.24. Eorhriocephalus acheilognarhi. Scolex: note inverted heart-shape. Hosts: Cyprinidae. Scale bar
1 mm.
FIG.25. Eorhriocephalus ucheilognarhi. Scolex: to show apical disc not distinctly separated from scolex
(arrowed) and slit-like bothria. Scale bar 1 mm.
Triaenophorus nodulosus
(Fig. 21). Adult worms specific to intestine of Esox lucius.
Copepods as first intermediate hosts, plerocercoids encapsulated in
liver of fishes (see 6 above). Widespread, coincident with E. lucius.
Scolex without hooks
17
17. Scolex with two bothria
18
Scolex with four suckers
23
18. Scolex lacking apical disc. Vitelline glands located laterally in proglottis
Bat hybo thrium rec t angulum
(Figs 22,23). Adult worms in intestine of Burbus barbus in R . Ouse
system, Yorkshire (Andrews 8i Chubb, 1984). Bothria wide-open
when scolex relaxed in cold water.
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvut
zyxw
A KEY
TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
53 1
zyx
Scolex with apical disc. Vitelline glands not located laterally in proglottisl9
19. Apical disc not distinctly separated from scolex (Figs 24, 25, 26). Strobila
without dorsal and ventral furrow
20
Apical disc distinctly separated from scolex (Figs 27,28,29). Strobila with
21
dorsal and ventral furrow (Figs 28,29)
20. Scolex an inverted heart-shape, apical disc square, bothria slit-like
Bothriocephalus acheilognathi
(Figs 24, 25). Adult worms parasitic in intestine of cyprinids,
occasionally other fishes. Vitelline glands evenly distributed
throughout cortical layer of proglottis. Copepods are intermediate
hosts. An imported species currently most likely to be found in
cultured or ornamental fishes.
Scolex longer than wide when relaxed, apical disc bilobed, with two obvious
indentations, one above each of the shallow, open bothria
Bothr iocephalus claviceps
(Fig. 26). Adult worms parasitic in intestine of Anguilla anguilla.
Immature individuals occasionally found in other species of fishes.
Copepods serve as intermediate hosts. Widespread through Britain
and Ireland, but adults specific to A. anguilla.
21. Apical disc of scolex with four indentations
Eubothrium crassum
(Fig. 27). Adults parasitic in pyloric caeca of Salmo salar, brown
trout, S. trutta L., and rainbow trout, S. gairdneri Richardson.
Copepod species serve as first intermediate hosts, with plerocercoids or juvenile worms in the intestine of a variety of non-salmonid
fishes. Two races of E. crassum are found in the British Isles, one in
freshwater S. trutta and the other in anadromous S. salar and S.
trutta (Andersen & Kennedy, 1983). Common throughout British
Isles.
22
Apical disc of scolex with two indentations (Figs. 28,29)
22. Apical disc with smooth, flat surface
Eubothrium salvelini
(Fig. 28). Adults parasitic in pyloric caeca of charr, Salvelinus
alpinus (L.). Copepods serve as intermediate hosts. Found only in
waters with S. alpinus.
Apical disc with prominent boss at centre
Eubothrium fragilis
(Fig. 29). Adults parasitic in intestine of allis shad, Alosa fallax
(Lactpide). Our materials from R. Severn.
23.
Genus Proteocephalus
Four suckers on scolex, often with an apical glandular area which
has been erroneously described as a fifth sucker. Copepods are
intermediate hosts. Twelve species are known to occur in Britain
and Ireland. The adult worms are specific to a single species of fish.
P. torulosus is an exception, occurring in a range of Cyprinidae.
Table I facilitates the identification of species of Proteocephalus, but should only
be used when mature and gravid worms are found in the appropriate species of fish,
since juvenile Proteocephalus are transient members of the intestinal fauna of
zyxwvu
532
zyxwvuts
zyxwvu
zyxwvutsr
J . C . CHUBB ET A L .
zyxwvuts
zyx
zyxw
zyx
FIG.26. Eurhriocephuluv cluviceps. Note scolex longer than wide and the bilobed apical disc with an
indentation aboveeach bothrium (arrowed). Host: eel, Anguillu unguillu. Scale bar 0.5 mm.
FIG.27. Eubothrium c r u s s u ~ Note
.
four indentations (arrowed) in prominent apical disc of scolex. Hosts:
salmon, Sulmu sulur, brown trout. S. rruttu, rainbow trout, S. guirdneri. Scale bar 1 rnm.
FIG.28. Euborhrium sulvelini. Note two indentations on prominent apical disc of scolex (arrowed) and
strobikd with dorsal and ventral furrow (also arrowed). Host: charr, Sulvelinus alpinus. Scale bar
0.5 mm.
FIG.29. Eubothrium frugilis. The prominent central boss and two slight indentations of apical cap are
arrowed. Host: allis shad, Alusufulkux. Scale bar 0.5 mm.
zyxwvutsr
zyxw
zy
A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
533
zy
zyxwvu
species of fishes in which they cannot mature. Relevant species of fish are listed, in
alphabetical order of generic name, in column 1 of Table I. The appropriate species
of Proteocephalus specific to these fishes are given in column 2, with evidence for
the host specificity summarized in column 3 . Where we have been able to provide
photographs of scolices of the species, the figure number is given in column 4.
Notes about occurrence in the British Isles are provided in column 5 . In this
paper, we have provided neither full descriptions nor a key to the species of
Proteocephalus; we hope to prepare these for a later publication. However,
Table I1 gives details of some features of proglottis morphology of species of
Proteocephalus recorded in the British Isles. Full descriptions of each of these
species can be found in the sources indicated. It must be stressed that mature and
gravid individuals of Proteocephalus are necessary for species confirmation using
morphological characters, and that, even along the strobila of one worm, quite
dramatic variations in arrangement, number and size of the internal organs can
occur. At this time we recommend submission of Proteocephalus materials to a
specialist for identification. Voucher specimens, with pertinent data, should be
deposited in a national museum, so that the identity can be validated at a later date,
if necessary.
V. DISCUSSION
In compiling this checklist and key we have included all of the species of tapeworms known to us from freshwater fishes in Britain and Ireland. It is hoped that if
species occur which have not so far been reported, the publication of this key will
aid in their discovery. It is also hoped that the key will stimulate interest in, and
correct identification of, these interesting and important parasites of fishes. The
authors will welcome any comments for improvement of the key, records of the
occurrence of the species, and materials for identification. If specimens do not
readily conform to the characters we have used, it is vital that they be submitted to a
specialist for checking, since it is quite possible that, for a variety of reasons
discussed in detail below, the user may encounter species not currently considered
part of the fauna of the British Isles. In drawing attention to the following
specific instances, we hope to stimulate further research into the occurrence and
distribution of cestodes in the British Isles.
Four species of Caryophyllidea are given in the checklist; however, within the
genus Archigetes three additional species are known to occur in oligochaetes
of the family Tubificidae in the British Isles (Kennedy, 1965a,b): A . sieboldi, A .
hrachyurus Mrazek, 1908 and A. limnodrili (Yamaguti, 1934). Only A . sieboldi has
been recorded from the intestines of British fishes (Shillcock, 1972) although both
A . hrachyurus and A . limnodrili have been found in fishes in other parts of the
world. Kennedy (19656)provided a key to five species, two of which have not been
recorded from Britain. The three species, A . brachyurus, A . iimnodrili and A .
sieboldi can be distinguished as follows (modified after Kennedy, 1965b):
1 . In the anterior part of the body testes beginning after the vitellaria and not
arranged in longitudinal rows. Testes number 75-95 (mean 90)
Archigetes sieboldi
In the anterior part of the body testes beginning level with or in front of the
2
vitellaria and arranged in longitudinal rows
534
zyxwvu
J. C. C H U B B E T A L .
zy
FIG.30. Proteocephalus macrocephalus. Note absence of central glandulararea as surface feature. Host: eel,
Anguilla anguilla. Scale bar 0.25 mm.
FIG.31. Proteocephalusexiguus. Thecentral glandulararea (arrowed)is often incorrectly described as a fifth
apical sucker. Host: gwyniad, Coregonus lavarefus. Scale bar 0.25 mm.
FIG. 32. Proieocephalus torulosus. An optical microscope photograph. Hosts: Cyprinidae. Scale bar
0.25 mm.
FIG.33. ProfeocephalusJilicoIlis. Host: three-spined stickleback, Gasferosteusaculeafus. Scale bar 0.25 mm.
2. Testes arranged in rows, of 30-40 each, 12&159 (mean 137) in total
Archigetes brachyurus
A K E Y TO T H E SPECIES OF CESTODES
535
z
zyxwvutsrq
zyxw
zyxwvutsr
FIG.34. fro/eocephalus ocellurus. Note indistinct glandular area (arrowed) at apex of scolex. Host: perch,
zyxwvut
PercoJluviurilis. Scale bar 0.25 mm.
FIG.35. Proreocephalusneglecrus. Note central glandular area (arrowed). Host: brown trout, Salrno rrurra.
Scale bar 0.25 mm.
FIG.36. Proreocephalus oscularus. This worm was removed from the host by anthelmintic treatment; hence,
note eversion of sucker tissue and central glandular area (arrowed). Host: wels, Silurus glanis. Scale
bar 0.25 mm.
Testes 39-63 (mean 50)
Archigetes limnodrili
As the records of Caryophyllaeus jimbriceps in Barbus barbus and Leuciscus
leuciscus from Boston, Lincs and the River Avon, Hants were regarded as doubtful
by the original author (Kennedy, 1974), we attempted to obtain new materials of
this species from overseas for comparative purposes, but failed. Consequently, we
zyxwvutsrqpo
zyxwvutsr
zyxwv
zyxw
zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgf
zy
zyxwvutsrqponmlk
zyxwvuts
TARLE
1. Identification of species of Proreocephulusrecorded in the British Isles by means of host specificity. See text for explanation
Fish host species
Proieocephulus species
(1)
(2)
A I I ~ U ~ Iariguillu.
ILI
cel
Corcgonirr ulhulu.
P. r~iucroccpiialus
P. pollanicola
vcndance. pollan
Cori,~.~oriu.s
lulwetus,
P. c*siguus
schclly. powan, gwyniad
Cyprinidac: Lcuciscus cepholus.
chub; L . 1c.uci.rc.ir.v.dace;
Riirilus ruriliis, roach
P. rorulosus
Go.stiwi.sriw.suidiiarus.
P..filicollb
rufTc
Nocni~iclieilushurhutir1ir.t
Fig. number
(4)
All records of mature worms in British
Isles from A . anguilla
Recorded only from C. albula (Gresson
& Corbett, 1954)
Recorded only from C . luvaretus
(Chubb, 1963)
All records in British Isles from
cyprinid hosts (Kennedy, 1974)
30
31
32
-
P. strgirrus
Specific to N.barbalulus in U.S.S.R.
-
P. ocellarus
Demonstrated experimentally
(Willemse, 1969)
Demonstrated experimentally
(Willemse, 1968)
34
P. iwnua
33
stone-loach
Piwu.fluiiuri1i.s.
perch
Pungirius pungiriirs.
P. umhiguus
ten-spined stickleback
Sulmo Kuirilneri,
-
-
P. parallaclicus
rainbow trout
Sulnio trurra.
P. nl~glecrus
brown trout
Sulwlinus ulpinus.
Demonstrated experimentally
(Priemier, 1980)
35
-
P. species?
charr
S i l i o i r . ~g1ani.v.
wels
P. o.sculuru.s
Only in S. glanis in Europe and
U.S.S.R.
Notes about occurrence in
British Isles
(5)
Widespread in British Isles (see Kennedy, 1974).
In Ireland (J. C. Chubb, unpubl.)
Demonstrated experimentally
(Willemse, 1968)
Demonstrated experimentally
(Willemse, 1969)
three-spined sticklcback
Gyninoccpiialus ccrnuu,
Evidence for host specificity
(3)
36
Lough Neagh, R.Bann, Ireland (Gresson &
Corbett, 1954). See Discussion
Llyn Tegid and Loch Lomond (Chubb, 1963 and
unpubl.). See Discussion
Widespread in cyprinid populations (see Kennedy,
1974)
Widespread in British Isles (see Kennedy, 1974;
Conneely & McCarthy, 1984)
Not reported in British Isles to date, but gravid
Proreocephalusfrom G. cernua should be critically
examined. See Discussion
In British Isles in Jersey (Kennedy er al., 1986)and
Yorkshire (C.Andrews, unpubl.)
Recorded in England (see Kennedy, 1974)but not
Ireland
P.jlicollis recorded in P. pungitius by Dartnall
(1973) and Conneely & McCarthy (1984). In light
of Willemse (1968) experiments these records need
reassessment. See Discussion
Single record, Kilrea, Antrim, Ireland (Anne &
Ingham, 1972). See Discussion
Recorded in Welsh River Dee system (Chubb,
1977; Rahim, 1981)
Proreocephalusspecies, as yet undetermined, occur
in S. alpinus in Windermere and Loch Ness
(J. C. Chubb. unpubl.)
Only recorded from a Yorkshire fish farm
(Andrews & Chubb, 1984). See Discussion
z
zyxwvutsrqp
zyxwvu
zyxw
537
A K E Y TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
TABLE
11. Some features of proglottis morphology of species of Proteocephalus recorded in
the British Isles
Ratio cirrus sac No. of lateral
length to width pouches on each
of proglottis
side of uterus
Proteocephalus
species
No' Of testes
per proglottis
P . ambiguus
P . cernua
P . exiguus
P .jlicollis
P . macrocephalus
P. neglectus
P . ocellatus
P . osculatus
P . parallacticus
P . pollanicola
30
60-80
24(30-40)54
45
80-1 10
63-77
about 50
180(250)424
45-92
60-75
1:4/3:10
1 :4/1:5
1 :2
1 :3/1:4
1:6/1:7
1:3
4:10
2:5/2:9
1:2
1 :4
5-7
5-8
5(8)14
7-8
7-9
5-9
8
5-9
7-12(15)
3-9
3555
60( 100)150
1:3/1:4
1:4/1:8
4-7
3-7
P . sagittus
P . torulosus
source of
data
Willemse, 1968
Willemse, 1969
Freze, 1965
Willemse, 1968
Willemse, 1969
Freze, 1965
zyxwv
Willemse, 1969
Freze, 1965
MacLulich, 1943
Gresson &
Corbett, 1954
Freze, 1965
Freze, 1965
Note: Priemer (1982) figures P. cernua. P. exiguus, P.jilicollis. P. macrocephalus, P. neglectus, P. ocellatus
(as P. percae), P. osculatus, P . pollanicola. P. sagitrus and P. torulosus.
have reproduced, in enlarged form, the figure of the scolex from the original
description (Annenkova-Khlopina, 1919). The scolex of C .fimbriceps appears to
be sufficiently distinct from that of C . futiceps to allow differentiation of the two
species.
Khawiasinensis Hsu, 1935was described from Cyprinus carpio in China but since
that time it has spread with cultured cyprinid fishes to many parts of the world. It is
probably only a matter of time, therefore, before K. sinensis is found in Britain.
The scolex is broad, flat and h b r i a t e , but not separated from the body by a welldefined, constricted neck (Schmidt, 1986). Superficially, however, specimens of K.
sinensis which we have examined from Algeria could easily be mistaken for a
species of Caryophyffueus.K. sinensis belongs to the family Lytocestidae, members
of which have the vitellaria entirely cortical, with the testes medullary. By contrast,
worms of the family Caryophyllaeidae, to which C. faticeps and C . jmbriceps
belong, have both the vitellaria and testes entirely medullary. Accordingly, transverse sections are necessary to separate K . sinensis from C . futicepsor C.fimbriceps.
Even with such sections, great care must be taken in searching for the parenchymal
musculature of K. sinensis which separates the vitelline glands from the testes, as
the bundles of muscle are discontinuous and not strongly manifest.
Of the order Trypanorhyncha, only plerocercoids of Hepatoxyfon squafi have
been found in fresh waters, in Safmosafur returning from the sea to spawn. Careful
searching of other anadromous fishes could reveal more species of trypanorhynch
larvae. As the structure of the scolex and, especially, the arrangement ofhooksand
spines are highly specific, other species should be readily distinguished from H.
squafi.
A number of remarks are necessary concerning members of the order Pseudophyllidea. Two species of the genus Digramma could occur in the British Isles, but
zyxwvu
538
zyxwvuts
zyxwvu
J . C. CHUBB E T A L .
so far have not been reported. Members of this genus closely resemble species of
Ligula but, whereas a single series of genital complexes occurs along the length of
the strobila of Ligula, there are two regular longitudinal rows in Digramma species.
Externally, Ligula species have one longitudinal ventral groove, whereas Digramma
species have two parallel, longitudinal and ventral grooves. Plerocercoid larvae of
Digramma interrupta (Rudolphi, 1810) are primarily parasites of crucian carp,
Carassius carassius (L.), Prussian carp, Carassius auratus gibelio (Bloch) and
Abramis brama in the U.S.S.R. (Dubinina, 1966) although they also occur less
frequently in other species of wild and cultivated cyprinids. D. interrupta plerocercoids in cyprinids. and adults in piscivorous birds, have been recorded in western
Europe (Dubinina, 1966), so they are likely to occur in the British Isles. D .
nemachili Dubinina, 1957, with plerocercoids in fishes of the genus Noemacheilus,
could also potentially occur in British N . barbatulus.
There are four species of the genus Diphyllobothrium present in the British Isles.
Adult D. latum were formerly reported regularly from man in parts of Ireland, and
less frequently (perhaps only) in continental immigrants in Britain (van Bonsdorff,
1977). While this species was probably endemic throughout the British Isles at one
time, and until recently in Ireland, there are no modern records of plerocercoids in
freshwater fishes. D. dendriticum and D. ditremum plerocercoids are commonly
recorded in salmonoid fishes in Ireland, Scotland and Wales, with fewer occurrences in England. D. vogeli is a more enigmatic species: originally described by
Kuhlow (1953), the adult worms were obtained from experimental infections of the
black-headed gull, Larus ridibundus L.; the plerocercoids were collected from
Gaslerosteus aculeatus. In the R. Elbe, Germany they infected 15% of G. aculeatus
and were located in the outer layer of the liver, and when placed in physiological
saline the larvae were very motile, more so than those of the other species Kuhlow
found in Germany. In addition, the long microtriches, 18-35pm, were considered
highly characteristic. Chubb (1968), however, regarded adult D. vogeli from L.
ridibundus as described by Kuhlow (1953) to be primary strobila of D. ditremum,
and Halvorsen (1970) also, as a working hypothesis, regarded D . vogeli as a synonym of D. ditremum. Bylund (1975a,b) subsequently found pronounced differences in the strobila of adult worms of D. ditremum and D. vogelireared in the same
species of definitive hosts. Furthermore, differences were also found during an
examination of the embryonic hooks (Bylund, 1975c) and gel electrophoresis performed on the whole-body proteins of the adult worms (Bylund, 1977). There
seems, therefore, no reason to doubt the distinctness of the two species, D.
ditremum and D. vogeli, although it is unusual that the fish host, G. aculeatus, can
harbour three species of Diphyllobothrium, D. dendriticum, D. ditremum and D.
vogeli, and that two of these species, D. dendriticum and D. vogeli, also utilize
Laridae (gulls) as definitive hosts. Further studies of D. vogeli in the field may
demonstrate clearer niche-separation between this and the other species, and help
to clarify their taxonomic status. In Britain, plerocercoids of D . vogeli have been
found at Llyn Padarn, Wales and Loch Ness, Scotland in the livers of G. aculeatus
(J. C . Chubb, unpubl.).
Larvae of two species of Schistocephalus, S. pungitii and S. solidus, are included
in the key. Until recently (Hyslop & Chubb, 1983) S. pungitii was not separated
from S. solidus in the British Isles, despite experimental evidence showing that S .
solidus procercoids established themselves normally in Gasterosteus aculeatus,
zyxwv
zyxwvutsr
zyxw
zyxwvuts
A KEY TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
539
whereas in Pungitiuspungitius their growth ceased after 6 to 8 days and the larvae
were dead by day 11 at 19.5" C and day 14 at 10" C (Orr et al., 1969). Briten (1966)
also demonstrated that plerocercoids of S . solidus from G . aculeatus implanted by
surgical transfer into P. pungirius failed to grow and showed degeneration of
microtriches after 6 days, but survived for long periods. Thus, the records of
S . solidus from P . pungitius (Kane, 1966; Dartnall, 1973) must be referred to
S . pungitii.
We have not included ' Scolexpleuronectis ' Miiller, 1788 (order Tetraphyllidea)
in the key. These larvae, of an unknown number of species of tetraphyllids, are of
marine origin and are common in a variety of marine and estuarine fishes. We have
seen them in flounder, Platichthysjesus (L.), from the River Dee, Wales which
have migrated from the sea into the river to feed. ' S. pleuronectis ' larvae are of
small size, usually a few millimetres in length, and of diverse form. Yamaguti
(1934) divided them into five types. However, until enough specimens with fully
developed scolices are available from freshwater or estuarine fishes for comparison
with adult tetraphyllids from marine fishes, it is unlikely that precise identification
will be possible.
A large number of species of the genus Proteocephalus (order Proteocephala)
occur in fishes in the British Isles. Five of these, P.JilicoNis, P . macrocephalus, P .
neglectus, P . ocellatus (formerly, but incorrectly, known as P . percae, see Willemse,
1969) and P . torulosus require no further comment. Our record of P . oscufatus is
from wels, Silurus gfanis (L.), on a fish farm (Andrews & Chubb, 1984), so it is
possible that the cestode may not occur in this fish in the few waters in which it is
resident in southern England. Kennedy et al. (1986) reported P. sagittus in
Noemacheilus barbatulus from Jersey and suggested that the cestode had colonized
the island from France. We have, however, seen P . sagittus in N . barbatulus from
Yorkshire ( C . Andrews, unpubl. comm.).
The remaining species of Proteocephalus require further study before their precise status in the British Isles is clear. Proteocephalus pollanicola was described
from pollan, Coregonus albula (L.), in Lough Neagh, Ireland by Gresson (1952)
and Gresson & Corbett (1954). It has not been reported subsequently from
anywhere else. However, P . exiguus has been noted from gwyniad, Coregonus
fuvuretus (L.), in Llyn Tegid, Wales, and a species, probably also P . exiguus, has
been found in C. lavaretus in Loch Lomond, Scotland (J. C . Chubb, unpubl.). As
P . exiguus occurs in both C. albula and C. favaretus in the U.S.S.R. (Ieshko &
Anikieva, 1980) a detailed reappraisal of proteocephalids from the species of
Coregonus in the British Isles is obviously necessary.
We are dubious whether Proteocephalus cernua is present in the British Isles.
Willemse (1969) was convinced that P . cernua from ruffe, Gymnocephalus cernuu
(L.), in the Netherlands was a distinct species. He reached this conclusion on the
basis of field observations of host specificity,experimental laboratory infections of
fishes and a morphological study of the adult worms. However, his experimental
study in this instance did not give decisive results. Wootten (1973) reported a low
prevalence (3.6%) and mean intensity (2.0) of P . oceflatus (as P . percae) from G .
cernua in Hanningfield Reservoir, Essex. In Percafluviutilis, prevalence (53.6%)
and mean intensity (1 3.4) of P . oceflatus were high. Wootten (1973) noted specifically that P. oceflatusin the atypical host G. cernua were infrequent and not mature,
so it is likely that he was correct in his identification. In samples of G. cernua from
zyxwvu
540
zyxwvuts
zyxwvuts
zyxwvu
zy
J . C. CHUBB E T A L .
the Serpentine, London (Lee, 1977) and from Llyn Tegid (Bala Lake), Wales ( S .
Wild, unpubl. comm.) P . cernua has not been found. However, there is a possibility
that some habitats in England where G . cernua is local but abundant will contain
P. cernua.
Proteocephalusjilicollis has been reported by Dartnall (1973) and Conneely &
McCarthy (1984) from Pungitius pungitius. However, according to Willemse
(1 968), although the morphological characteristics separating P . jilicollis from
Gasterosteus aculeatus and P . ambiguus from Pungitius pungitius were small,
experimental infections demonstrated that a high degree of host specificity existed
in cestodes from the two hosts. He took eggs from worms in P. pungitius and
infected Cyclops strenuus with them. C. strenuus containing larvae were fed to
fishes 4-7 weeks after ingestion of eggs. Infections always established in P .
pungitius but never in G. aculeatus, nor in other fish species. Willemse (1968) also
found it impossible to take adult cestodes from one of the stickleback species and to
transfer them experimentally to the other host species, whereas control transfers
between fishes of the same stickleback species were always successful. We must
assume, as a result of these experiments, that both P . jilicollis and P . ambiguus
occur in the British Isles in their respective hosts, G. aculeatus and P . pungitius.
It would be appropriate to extend the study of Willemse (1968) by attempting
to infect P . pungitius with experimentally reared larvae of P. jilicollis from
G . aculeatus.
Arme & Ingham (1972) found a species of Proteocephalus in Sulmo gairdneri in
Ireland which they considered to resemble P . parallacticus, a north American
species from lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum), speckled trout,
Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill), and Salmo trutta. We suggest that the Irish
materials may have been either P. neglectus, found in Salmo trutta in some other
parts of the British Isles, or P . exiguus, reported by Priemer & Goltz (1986) from
S. gairdneri in the German Democratic Republic.
Some other species of Proteocephalus are likely to be identified from freshwater
or migratory fishes in the British Isles. For instance, we have recovered juvenile
Proteocephalus from Salvelinus alpinus in Windermere, England and in Loch Ness,
Scotland. In addition, when migratory fishes such as the smelt, Osmerus eperlanus
(L.), are carefully examined, we predict the discovery of P . longicollis (Zeder, 1800)
and P. tetrastomus (Rudolphi, 1810). Willemse (1969) found both these species in
0. eperlanus in fresh waters in the Netherlands. Osmerus eperlanus is fairly widespread and common in estuaries and lower reaches of rivers in eastern England
(Maitland, 1972).
The importation of commercial and ornamental fishes into the British Isles has
led to the introduction of several species of cestodes into our fresh waters.
Bothriocephalus acheilognathi is one well-documented example (Stott, 1977;
Andrewsetal., 1981;Chubb, 1981;Pooletal., 1984; Pool&Chubb, 1985). It isnot
yet clear whether this cestode will become established in native fish populations as
it has in other European countries. We predicted earlier in this discussion that the
caryophyllidean cestode Khawia sinensis will eventually be found in imported
Cyprinidae.
Throughout the key we have indicated the sites of occurrence of the cestodes
within the fishes. In some instances cestodes can locate in alternative organs, but
post-mortem effects or careless dissection can also lead to worms being displaced.
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvuts
A
K E Y TO THE SPECIES OF CESTODES
54 1
A further complication is that the intestines of piscivorous fishes, birds or
mammals can temporarily house worms from recently consumed, infected fishes.
Thus Esox lucius in Llyn Tegid may often have adult worms of Proteocephafus
exiguus in their stomachs, which originated from the pyloric caeca of Coregonus
/ m a r e f u s . These proteocephalids do not re-establish in the intestine of E. fucius and
will either be digested or defaecated.
A corollary from the points made in the latter paragraphs of this discussion is
that any cestodes which do not conform to the information provided in this key
should be submitted to a specialist for identification.
We wish to thank Professor A. J. Cain (Department of Zoology, University of Liverpool)
and Dr A. F. Brown (Department of Applied Biology, University of Wales Institute of
Science and Technology) for reading the manuscript critically. We are also indebted to the
following colleagues and friends for providing specimens of cestodes or unpublished data:
Dr C. Andrews (The Zoological Society of London), Dr M. Aprahamian (Welsh Water
Authority), Professor 0.N. Bauer (Institute of Zoology, Academy of Sciences, Leningrad),
Dr A. F. Brown (Department of Applied Biology, University of Wales Institute of Science
and Technology), Dr G. Bylund (Institute of Parasitology, Abo Akademi), Dr L. H.
Chappell (Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen), M r A. F. Dearsley (Thames
Water Authority), Dr A-R. A-M. Rasheed (Department of Biology, University of
Salahaddin, Iraq), M r A. Richmond (Jerveaux Angling Club) and Mr S. Wild. Finally, we
thank M r B. Lewis for printing the figures and Mrs L. Christiansen for word-processing the
manuscript.
zyxwvuts
zy
zyxw
zy
zyx
References
Andersen, K. I. & Kennedy, C. R. (1983). Systematics of the genus Eubothrium Nybelin
(Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea), with partial re-description of the species. 2001.
Scriptu
12,95-105.
Andrews, C. & Chubb, J. C. (1984). Helminth parasites from Yorkshire fishes. Bull. Eur.
ASS. Fish Pathol. 4,22-23.
Andrews, C. & Chubb, J. C., Coles, T. & Dearsley, A. (I98 I). The occurrence of Bothriocephulus acheilognuthi Yamaguti, 1934 ( B .gowkongensis) (Cestoda: Pseudophyllidea)
in the British Isles. J. Fish Dis. 4,89-93.
Annenkova-Khlopina, N. P. (1919). (Two new kinds of parasitic worms of the genus
Curyophyllueus, found in the intestineofcarp fishes.) Izvest. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. 6
13,97-110. (In Russian).
Arme, C. & Ingham, L. (1972). Proteocephalus sp. in rainbow trout, Sulmogairdneri: a new
host record for the Palaearctic. Ir. Nut. J . 17,241-242.
von Bonsdorff, B. (1977). Diphllobothriasis in Man. London: Academic Press. pp. i-xii,
1-189.
BrGten, T. ( 1966). Host specificity in Schistocephulus solidus. Purastiology 56,657-664.
Bykhovskaya-Pavlovskaya, I. E., Gussev, A. V., Dubinina, M. N., Izyumova, N. A.,
Smirnova, T. S., Sokolovskaya, I. L., Shtein, G. A., Shul’man, S. S. & Epshtein, V.
M. (1962). Key to the Parasites of Freshwater Fishes of the U.S.S.R.. Moscow &
Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. 776 pp. (In Russian.) Translation
Israel Program for Scientific Translations 1964 Cat. No. 1136.
Bylund, G. (19754. Delimitation and characterization of Euro an Diphyllobothrium
species. Academic Dissertation. Department of Biology, f
r
bo Akademi, Finland
(ISBN 951-648-172-8)23 pp.
Bylund, G. (19756). Studies on the taxonomic status and biology of Diphyllobothrium
vogeli Kuhlow, 1953. Commentationes Biol. 79, 1-22.
Bylund, G. (19754. The taxonomic significance of embryonic hooks in four European
Diphyllobothrium species (Cestoda, Diphyllobothriidae). Acta zool. fenn. 142,1-22.
Bylund, G . (1977). Protein profiles as an aid to taxonomy in the genus Diphyllobothrium.
Z . Parasitenk. 51,241-247.
542
zyxwvutsr
zyxwvu
zyxwv
zyxwvuts
J . C. CHUBB E T A L .
Chubb, J. C. (1963). On the characterization of the parasite fauna of the fish of Llyn Tegid.
Proc. 2001. SOC.London. 141,609-621.
Chubb, J. C. (1968). Tapeworms of the genus Diphyllobothrium in the British Isles.
Parasitology 58,22P (Abstract).
Chubb, J. C. (1977). A review of the parasite fauna of the fishes of the River Dee system. A
report for the Central Water Planning Unit, Reading, England. Pp. i-x, 1-107.
Chubb, J. C. (1981). The Chinese tapeworm BothriocephalusacheilognathiYamaguti,1934
(synonym B. gowkongensis Yeh, 1955) in Britain. Proc. 2nd Brit. Freshwat. Fish.
Conf.,40-51.
Conneely, J. J. & McCarthy, T. K. (1984). The metazoan parasites of freshwater fishes in
the Corrib catchment area, Ireland. J. Fish Biol. 24,363-375.
Dartnall, H. J. G. (1973). Parasites of the nine-spined stickleback, Pungitiuspungitius (L.).
J. Fish Biol. 5,505-509.
Davydov, 0. N. (1978). (Growth, development and fecundity of Bothriocephalus
gowkongensis (Yeh, 1955), a cyprinid parasite.) Gidrobiol. Zh. 14, 70-77. (In
Russian.) Translation Hydrobiol. J. 14,60-66.
Dearsley, A. F., Moore, J. F. & Thomas, R. M. (1982). A checklist of fish parasites
encountered in Lea Division between 1976 and 1981 with maps showing their distribution. Thames Water, Lea Division. 97 pp.
Dubinina, M. N. (1966). Ligulidae (Cestoda) Fauna of the U.S.S.R.Moscow & Leningrad:
Izdatel’stvo ‘ Nauka ’. 161 pp. (In Russian.) Translation, New Delhi: Amerind
Publishing, 1980, pp. i-vii, 1-320.
Freeman, R. S. (1973). Ontogeny of cestodes and its bearing on their phylogeny and
systematics. In Advances in Parasitology, Vol. 11 (B. Dawes, ed.) pp. 481-557.
London: Academic Press.
Freze, V. 1. (1965). Principles of Cestodology Vol. V. Proteocephalata-Cestodes of Fish,
Amphibians and Reptiles (K. I. Skryabin, ed.). Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ‘ Nauka ’.
538 pp. (In Russian). Translation, Israel Program for Scientific Translations 1969,
Cat. No. 1853.
Freze, V. I. (1977). European Diphyllobothrium. (Experimental study of polymorphism).
Trudy gel’mint. Lab. 27, 174-204. (In Russian.)
Gresson, R. A. R. (1952). A new species of Proteocephalus from Coregonus pollan
Thompson. Ir. Nut. J. 10,308.
Gresson, R. A. R. & Corbett, M. P. (1954). A morphological study of a fish tapeworm,
Proteocephalus pollanicola. Parasitology 44,34- 49.
Halvorsen, 0. (1970). Studies of the helminth fauna of Norway XV: on the taxonomy and
biology of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 (Cestoda, Pseudophyllidea) from north-western Europe. Nytt Mag. Zool. 18, 1 13-1 74.
Hyslop, E. J. & Chubb, J. C. (1983). Schistocephaluspungitii Dubinina, 1959 (Cestoda) in
Britain. Parasitology 87, xxx (Abstract).
leshko, E. P. & Anikieva, L. V. (1980). The polymorphism of Proteocephalus exiguus
(Cestoidea: Proteocephalidae, a mass parasite of coregonid fish. Parazitologiya 14,
422-426. (In Russian.)
Jarecka, L. (1970). Life cycle of Valipora campylancristrota (Wedl, 1855) Baer and Bona
1958-1 960 (Cestoda-Dilepididae) and the description of cercoscolex-a new type of
cestode larva. Bull. Acad. pol. Sci. CI. I1 Ser. Sci. Biol. 18,99-102.
Kane, M. B. (1966). Parasites of Irish fishes. Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin SOC.B 1,205-220.
Kennedy, C. R. (1965~).The life-history of Archigetes limnodrili (Yamaguti) (Cestoda:
Caryophyllaeidae) and its development in the invertebrate host. Parasitology 55,
427-437.
Kennedy, C . R. (19656). Taxonomic studies on Archigetes Leuckart, 1878 (Cestoda:
Caryophyllaeidae). Parasitology 55,439-45 1.
Kennedy, C. R. (1974). A checklist of British and Irish freshwater fish parasites with notes
on their distribution. J. Fish Biol. 6,613-644.
Kennedy, C. R., Laffoley, D. d’A., Bishop, G., Jones, P. &Taylor, M. (1986). Communities
of parasites of freshwater fish of Jersey, Channel Islands. J. Fish Biol. 29,215-226.
zyxw
zyxwvut
zyxwvut
zyxwvutsr
zy
zyx
A KEY TO THE SPECIES O F CESTODES
543
Kuhlow, F. (1953). Beitrage zur Entwicklung und Systematik heimischer Diphyllobothrium
-Arten. 2.Tropenmed. Parasit. 4,203-234.
Lee, R. L. G . (1977). The Serpentine fish and their parasites. London Nut. No. 56,57-70.
MacLulich, D. A. (1943). Proteocephalus parallacticus, a new species of tapeworm from
lake trout, Cristivomer namaycush. Can. J . Res. 21, 145-149.
Maitland, P. S. (1972). A key to the freshwater fishes of the British Isles with notes on their
distribution and ecology. Freshwat. Biol. Ass. Sci. Publ. No. 27, 1-139.
Orr, T. S. C., Hopkins, C. A. & Charles, G . H. (1969). Host specificity and rejection of
Sch istocephalus solidus. Parasitology 59,683-690.
Pavlovski, E. N. & Gnezdilov, U. G. (1949). The multiplicity factor in experimental infection with the broad tapeworm. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 67,759-761. (In Russian.)
Pool, D. W. & Chubb, J. C. (1985). A critical scanning electron microscope study of the
scolex of Bothriocephalus acheilognathi Yamaguti, 1934, with a review of the
taxonomic history of the genus Bothriocephalus parasitizing cyprinid fishes. Syst.
Parasitol. 7, 199-2 1 1.
Pool, D. W., Ryder, K. & Andrews, C. (1984). The control of Bothriocephalusacheilognathi
in grass carp, Crenopharyngodon idella, using praziquantel. Fish. Mgmr 15,3 1-33.
Priemer, J. ( 1980). Zum Lebenszyklus von Proteocephalus neglectus (Cestoda) aus
Regenbogenforellen Saltno gairdneri. Angew. Parasitol. 21, 125-1 33.
Priemer, J. (1982). Bestimmung von Fischbandwiirmern der Gattung Proteocephalus
(Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) in Mitteleuropa. Zool. Anz., Jena 108,244-264.
Priemer, J. & Goltz, A. (1986). Proteocephalus exiguus (Cestoda) als Parasit von Salmo
guirdneri (Pisces). Angew. Parasitol. 27, 157-168.
Rahim, M. A. (1981). Occurrence of helminth parasites of brown trout in the river Alyn,
North Wales. Pakistun J. Zool. 13, 169-177.
Read, C. P. & Voge, M. (1954). The size attained by Hymenolepis diminuta in different host
species. J. Parasit. 40,88-89.
Schmidt. G. D. (1986). CRC Handbook of Tapeworm Identification. Boca Raton, Florida:
CRC Press Inc. pp. i-vii, 1-675.
Schnur, L. F. (1969). The use of methylene blue for staining cestodes. J. Sci. Technol. 15,
33-34.
Shillcock, D. J. (1972). Ecological studies on the platyhelminth fauna of freshwater fish
from a lake and river in Essex, with special reference to the roach. Ph.D. Thesis,
University of London.
Stott, B. (1977). On the question of the introduction of the grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon
idella Val.) into the United Kingdom. Fish. Mgmt 8,63-7 1.
Willemse, J. J. (1968). Proteocephalus filicollis (Rudolphi, 1802) and Proteocephalus
ambiguus (Dujardin, I845), two hitherto confused species of cestodes. J. Helminth.
42,395-410.
Willemse, J. J. (1969). The genus Proteocephalus in the Netherlands. J. Helminth. 43,
207-222.
Wootten, R. (1973). The metazoan parasite-fauna of fish from Hanningfield Reservoir,
Essex in relation to features of the habitat and host -populations.
J. Zool., Lond. 171,
323-33 I .
Yamaguti, S. (1934). Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan, Part 4. Cestodes of fishes.
JUP.J. ZOO/.
6, 1-1 12.
zyxwvu
zyxwvu
zyx