Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE
Transactional Sex, Condom and Lubricant use among Men who
have Sex with Men in Lagos State, Nigeria
Oluyemisi O Ayoola*1, Adekemi O Sekoni2 and Kofoworola A Odeyemi2
1
Family Health International GHAIN, 2Department of Community Health & Primary Care, College of Medicine University of
Lagos
*For correspondence: Email: aosekoni@cmul.edu.ng; sekoniadekemi@yahoo.com; Phone: 08033448474 or 08075277372
Abstract
Men who have unprotected sex with men may also have unprotected sex with women and thus serve as an epidemiological bridge
for HIV to the general population. This cross sectional descriptive study assessed condom and lubricant use and practice of
transactional sex among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Lagos state. Simple random sampling was used to select three
community centres and snowball sampling technique was used to recruit 321 respondents. Almost half (50.9%) had received
payment for sex while 45.4% had paid for sex in the past. Consistent condom use was practiced by 40.5% of respondents during
the last 10 sexual encounters, 85.6% used lubricants mostly with condom, products used were KY jelly, body cream, saliva and
Vaseline. There is need for behavioural change to reduce risky practices which predisposes this group of MSM to HIV and
sexually transmitted infections. Afr J Reprod Health 2013 (Special Edition); 17[4]: 90-98).
Keywords: MSM, sex for money, unprotected sex, lubricants
Résumé
Les hommes qui ont des rapports sexuels non protégés avec des hommes peuvent aussi avoir des rapports sexuels non protégés
avec des femmes et servent ainsi de pont épidémiologique pour la transmission du VIH à la population générale. Cette étude
descriptive transversale a évalué l’emploi des préservatifs et du lubrifiant et la pratique de rapports sexuels transactionn els chez
les hommes qui ont des rapports sexuels avec des hommes (HSH) dans l'Etat de Lagos. L'échantillonnage aléatoire simple a été
utilisé pour sélectionner trois centres communautaires et la technique d'échantillonnage en boule de neige a été utilisée pour
recruter 321 personnes interrogées. Près de la moitié (50,9 %) avaient reçu le paiement pour le sexe alors que 45,4 % avaient
payé pour le sexe dans le passé. L’utilisation systématique du préservatif a été pratiquée par 40,5% des personnes interrogée s au
cours des 10 derniers rapports sexuels, 85,6 % ont utilisé des lubrifiants surtout avec le préservatif, les produits utilisés étaient
gelée KY, crème pour le corps, la salive et la vaseline. Il faut un changement de comportement afin de réduire les pratiques à
risque qui prédispose ce groupe des HSH au VIH et aux infections sexuellement transmissibles. Afr J Reprod Health 2013
(Edition Spéciale); 17[4]: 90-98).
Mots-clés: HSH, sexe transactionnel, préservatif, lubrifiants
Introduction
Men who have sex with men (MSM) describe a
behavioral phenomenon rather than a specific
group of people. It is generally the preferred term,
because in the context of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the important
issue is risk behavior rather than sexual identity1.
MSM do not constitute a uniform group of people,
it includes self-identified gay and bisexual men,
men who do not accept their gender and self
identify as women, men who engage in male-male
sex and self-identify as heterosexual. Married and
unmarried heterosexual men may also engage in
male to male sex 2.
Sex between men frequently involves anal
intercourse which, if unprotected, carries a high
risk of HIV transmission for the receptive partner,
and a significant risk for the insertive partner.
Male-male sex is often initiated during adolescent
years and is very common in the repertoire of
adolescent sexual experimentation. There are also
many institutions wherein men are obliged to
spend long periods in all male company such as in
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
90
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
the military, prisons, mining, and male-only
educational establishments; and in which malemale sex can be common3,4.
In many Western nations, MSM had been
identified very early on as one of the key riskgroups in the HIV epidemic; hence research and
HIV prevention efforts had focused more
specifically on the population to curb the spread of
HIV. In North America and Western Europe, there
is strong evidence of resurgent HIV epidemics
among MSM5. Data from 23 European countries
show that annual number of HIV diagnoses rose
by 86% between 2000 and 2006. In the United
States; gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex
with men represent approximately 2% of the
population, yet constitutes the population most
severely affected by HIV; and are the only risk
group in which new HIV infections has been
increasing steadily since the early 1990s. In 2006,
MSM accounted for 53% of all new HIV
infections; and MSM with a history of injection
drug use accounted for an additional 4% of new
infections6.
Nigeria ranks second in the world in terms of
the number of people living with HIV/AIDS, the
adult HIV prevalence increased from 1.8% in 1991
to 5.8% in 2001, before dropping to 4.4% in
20057. From the 2010 national HIV sero
prevalence study 4.1% was obtained for the
general population while MSM had prevalence
above 13%8. This disparity was also observed in a
study conducted in three cities in Nigeria where
MSM had prevalence four to ten times higher than
the general population9. Twenty three percent of
new cases of HIV infection in the same year was
attributed to high risks groups including MSM,
female sex workers (FSW) and injection drug
users (IDU). According to the 2010 integrated
biological and behavioral surveillance study
(IBBBS) 15.4% of MSM in Lagos state were
infected with HIV10.
Multiple prevention strategies to prevent HIV
and sexually transmitted infections which includes
correct and consistent condom use have been
shown to be highly effective. Consistent condom
use with male and female partners for all the states
in the IBBBS was shown to be generally low at
50%10, compared to the 2007 result, consistent
condom use with non-paying male partners
remained at 43% among MSM in Lagos state11.
Evidence indicates that unprotected paid sex is a
significant factor of the HIV epidemics in the
West African region12; the IBBSS showed that
only a third of the MSM who were involved in
transactional sex practiced consistent condom use
thereby putting them at risk of HIV infection10.
The use of water and silicone based lubricants has
been shown to be important for the correct
functioning of condoms during anal sex, it reduces
the risks of condoms breaking13. There is dearth of
data on lubricant use among MSM in Nigeria, in
view of the research going on in the development
of an acceptable antiretroviral rectal Microbicide
gel this study was carried out to assess the use of
condoms and lubricants and occurrence of
transactional sex among MSM in Lagos state.
Method
Lagos State is a group of islands located in the
South-Western region of Nigeria, it is divided into
20 local government areas and is the commercial
and industrial hub of the country with an estimated
population of 9,013,534 according to the 2006
national census14. As of April 2011 there were
eleven community centre's in Lagos state where
MSM can freely socialize without fear of stigma
or discrimination. The centre's also serves as focal
points for obtaining sexual health information, free
condom, lubricants, HIV counseling and testing
and referrals for health care related services.
Managed by Non-Governmental Organizations,
they are located in public buildings that are easily
accessible to the MSM population and on daily
basis an average of 6 to 10 MSM patronize each of
these centres.
A cross sectional descriptive study was carried
out among MSM aged 15 – 60 years; who
patronize MSM designated community centre's in
Lagos state. The formula for descriptive study n =
z2 pq/d 2 was used to calculate minimum sample
size of 291, prevalence of 25.5% obtained in a
previous study was used11, 10% was added to
make provision for
incompletely filled
questionnaires, hence a total of 321 questionnaires
were administered.
A list of MSM community centre's in Lagos
State was collected from the Lagos State AIDS
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
91
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
Control Agency (LSACA). Only 7 LGAs in the
state, namely Ajeromi-Ifelodun, Apapa, Eti-Osa,
Ikeja, Lagos Mainland, Suru-Lere and Mushin had
a total of eleven community centres. Three
community centres were selected using simple
random sampling; the selected centres were
located in Ajeromi-Ifelodun, Ikeja and Mushin
LGA. Courtesy visits were made to these
community centre's to intimate the management
about the purpose of the research study and obtain
support and permission to collect information from
MSM patronizing the centres.
Snowball sampling method was used in the
recruitment of 107 participants in each of the
LGA. On average, between five - seven MSM
patronize the centre in Mushin daily; 7 - 10 in
Ajeromi-Ifelodun and 8 - 12 in Ikeja. The MSM
operating the centres were recruited as the initial
seeds; and they were thereafter requested to recruit
their peers who visit the centres. These next
groups of respondents were equally asked to
identify peers and this went on until the desired
sample size of 107 respondents was attained in
each of the three centres. The data collection
lasted five weeks. Participation was voluntary,
written informed consent was obtained prior to
participation and they were assured of
confidentiality regarding information obtained.
Ethical approval for the study was obtained from
the ethics and research committee of Lagos
University Teaching Hospital.
The instrument for data collection was a pre
tested, semi structured questionnaire, three
research assistants were recruited and trained to
assist in the distribution of the questionnaires,
assist those who had difficulty in completing the
questionnaires and collection of the questionnaires
on the field. This was carried out in the month of
May 2011. Data obtained was entered and
analyzed using Epi info version 3.5.3 and
WinPepi. Data analysis involved the use of
frequency tables and chi-square was used to
determine association between variables at p<0.05.
Results
Most respondents were within 20 to 29 years
(68.8%) followed by 30-39 years (16.5%); less
than 20 years (13.7%) and those that were 40 years
and above (1.0%). The mean age of the
respondents was 25.28 years ± 4.60. More
respondents were Yoruba (49.1%) followed by
Igbo 34.4%, the Efik and Urhobo ethnic groups
constituted 9.2%, while the remaining 7.3% were
Hausas. Most respondents were Christians (76.6%)
followed by those that practiced Islam (21.0%).
Only 2.4% of the respondents practiced traditional
religion. More than half of the respondents
(58.8%) had secondary education and 32.3% had
tertiary education. Over half (57.4%) of the
respondents were unemployed while 42.6% were
employed. Most of the respondents were single
and not in a steady relationship (66.0%), 19.6%
were single, in a steady relationship/cohabiting,
7.2% were married to a female, 4.8% were married
to a male and the remaining 2.4% were either
divorced/separated (Table 1).
Table 1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of
Respondents
Characteristics (n=291)
Age (yrs.)
<20
20-29
30-39
≥40
Ethnic group
Yoruba
Igbo
Hausa
Efik and Urhobo
Religion
Christianity
Islam
Traditional
Marital status
Single, not in a steady
relationship
Single, in a steady
relationship/cohabiting
Married to a female
Married to a male
Divorced/separated
Educational Level
No Formal Education
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Employment Status
Unemployed
Employed
Frequency (%)
40 (13.7)
200 (68.8)
48 (16.5)
3 (1.0)
143 (49.1)
100 (34.4)
21 (7.3)
27 (9.2)
223 (76.6)
61 (21.0)
7 (2.4)
192 (66.0)
57 (19.6)
21 (7.2)
14 (4.8)
7 (2.4)
19 (6.5)
7 (2.4)
171 (58.8)
94 (32.3)
167 (57.4)
124 (42.6)
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
92
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
A little over half (50.5%) of the respondents were
homosexual while 47.8% were bisexual, the
remaining respondents were transgender (1.7%).
Two thirds of the respondents comprising 66.3%
were not living openly as MSM, while 33.0% were
living openly as MSM.
Among the respondents that were not living
openly as MSM, 33.7% were hiding their sexual
orientation from people generally, 32.6% were
hiding their orientation from their family and
19.2% were hiding their orientation specifically
from their friends. Only 14.5% of the respondents
were hiding theirs from their colleagues. More of
the respondents (68.7%) had multiple sex partners
with a mean of 2.9+1.5; more than half (52.9%)
had sex with males only, followed by those who
had sex with both male and female (47.1%) sexual
partners (Table 2).
Table 2: Sexual Identity of Respondents, Number
and Gender of Current Sexual Partners
Variable
Sexual identity (n=291)
Homosexual
Bisexual
Transgender
Openly living MSM (n=291)
Yes
No
Non response
Hiding sexual orientation from (n=
193)
Everybody
Family
Friends
Colleagues
Number of sexual partners (n=291)
1
2-3
4-5
>5
Mean = 2.9 1.5
Gender of Partners (n=291)
Males only
Both males and females
Frequency
147 (50.5)
139 (47.8)
5 (1.7)
96 (33.0)
193 (66.3)
2 (0.7)
65 (33.7)
63 (32.6)
37 (19.2)
28 (14.5)
91 (31.3)
107 (36.8)
43 (14.7)
50 (17.2)
154 (52.9)
137 (47.1)
About half (50.9%) of the respondents’ sexual
partners were just casual friends followed by
41.9% in steady relationships and 18.9% who had
sex with customers. Out of the respondents, 76.3%
who had sex with male partners had anal sex,
while 38.5% had oral sex. Respondents that had
vaginal sex with their female partners were 67.9%
followed by 48.2% who had oral sex and 24.8%
who had anal sex. Half of the respondents (50.9%)
had received money for sex; about one third
(29.7%) had accepted money to take care of self
and family including paying school fees, 15.5%
felt it was reward earned for sex, and another
15.5% had no reason for taking money, but just
took it because it was offered. For 11.5% of the
respondents, they accepted money because they
were sex workers. Over half (54.6%) had not paid
for sex in the past while the remaining 45.4% had
(Table 3).
Table 3: Sexual History of Respondents
Variable
*Type of Relationship (n=291)
Casual friends
Steady relationship
Customers
One night stand
Spouse
*Type of sex with male partners (n=291)
Anal sex
Oral sex
*Type of sex with female partners (n=137)
Vaginal sex
Oral sex
Ever received money for sex (n= 291)
Yes
*Reasons for receiving money for sex
(n=148)
To take care of self and family
Reward for sex
For no reason
Because I’m a sex worker
I didn’t have job
Because of coercion by boss
No response
Ever paid for sex (n=291)
Frequency
148 (50.9)
122 (41.9)
55 18.9)
47 (16.2)
25 (8.6)
222 (76.3)
112 (38.5)
93 (67.9)
66 (48.2)
148 (50.9)
44 (29.7)
23 (15.5)
23 (15.5)
17 (11.5)
1 (0.7)
1 (0.7)
39 (26.4)
132 (45.4)
*multiple response
Less than half (40.5%) used condom
consistently during the last 10 sexual episodes,
almost two thirds (62.5%) of respondents reported
using condom during the last sexual encounter,
among this group 93.4% used male condom. The
main reasons for not using condom were that
respondent got carried away (27.9%), partners
opposed the use (26.7%); condom was not
available (10.5%) while another 10.5% did not
want to bother about using it. Majority of the
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
93
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
respondents (87.6%) had access to condom; for
those who had access, 40.4% got condoms from
Pharmacy/chemist, 27.1% got it from the
community centre's and 14.9% got from their
partners (Table 4).
(67.9%) were using lubricants with condom;
58.2% used lubricants all the time, 21.3% used
often and 20.5% of the respondents used
occasionally (Table 5).
Table 5: Use of Lubricants among Respondents
Table 4: Condom Use among Respondents
Variable
Use of condom in the last 10 sexual
episodes (n=291)
All the time
6-8 times
4-5 times
2-3 times`
Once
Not at all
No response
Use of condom at last sex (n=291)
Yes
No
Non response
Type of condom used (n=182)
Male condom
Female condom
Reasons for non-use (n=86)
I got carried away
Partner opposed
I did not want to bother
Condom was not available
Condom is not reliable
Condom interferes with sexual pleasure
I was forced
I was too shy/afraid to use it
Access to condom (n= 291)
Yes
No
Source of Condoms (n= 255)
Pharmacy/ chemist
Community centres
Partner
Peer educators
Petty traders shop
Frequency
118 (40.5)
44 (15.1)
39 (13.4)
67 (23.0)
2 (0.7)
13 (4.5)
8 (2.8)
182 (62.5)
86 (29.6)
23 (7.9)
170 (93.4)
12 (6.6)
24 (27.9)
23 (26.7)
9 (10.5)
9 (10.5)
6 (7.0)
6 (7.0)
6 (7.0)
3 (3.4)
255 (87.6)
36 (12.4)
103 (40.4)
69 (27.1)
38 (14.9)
25 (9.8)
20 (7.8)
Most of the respondents (85.6%) used
lubricants, for respondents who were not using
lubricants, 59.5% did not use because they
believed they did not need it, 19.1% did not know
it was useful. KY jelly was used by 55.4% of
respondents; 44.6% used body cream; some
respondents (26.1%) used saliva while the
remaining 24.1% used Vaseline. Over two thirds
Variable
Use of lubricants (291)
Yes
No
Reasons for non use (n=42)
I didn’t need it
I didn’t know it was useful
I didn’t know where to get
I couldn’t afford to buy it
Type of lubricant used (n= 249) multiple
response
KY jelly
Body cream
Saliva
Vaseline
Method of Use (n=249)
With condom
With and without condom
Without condom
Frequency of Use (n=249)
All the time
Often
Occasionally
Frequency
249 (85.6)
42 (14.4)
25 (59.5)
8 (19.1)
6 (14.3)
3 (7.1)
138 (55.4)
111 (44.6)
65 (26.1)
60 (24.1)
169 (67.9)
66 (26.5)
14 (5.6)
145 (58.2)
53 (21.3)
51 (20.5)
There was statistically significant relationship
between receiving payment for sex and use of
condoms with more of the respondents (79.7%)
who received payment using condoms (X 2=7.638,
p=0.022). More of the respondents with no formal
education (68.4%) conducted transactional sex,
this was statistically significant (Likelihood-ratio
X2=33.664, p=0.000). More of the respondents
(70.8%) who used lubricants all the time used it
with condoms compared to respondents who used
lubricants without condom, this was statistically
significant (Fishers exact p=0.0001).
A higher proportion of the transgender
respondents (60%) were living openly as MSM
(X2=40.941, df=2, p=0.000 fishers) and 80.0% use
saliva as lubricants (X2=6.705, df=2, p=0.027
fishers), while a higher proportion of bisexual
respondents 57.5% had transactional sex (X 2 =
10.824, df=2, p=0.009 fishers) Table 6.
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
94
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
Table 6: Relationship between sexual orientation of respondents, their living openly as gay, engaging in
transactional sex and using saliva as lubricants
Sexual orientation
Homosexual
Bisexual
Transgender
Total
Homosexual
Bisexual
Transgender
Total
Homosexual
Bisexual
Transgender
Total
Living Openly as MSM
Yes
Frequency (%)
73 (49.7)
20 (14.6)
3 (60.0)
96 (33.2)
X2 = 40.941, df = 2, p = 0.000 (fishers)
Transactional Sex
71 (48.6)
77 (57.5)
0 (0.0)
148 (51.9)
X2 = 6.705, df = 2, p = 0.027 (fishers)
Use of Saliva as Lubricant
35 (23.8)
26 (18.7)
4 (80.0)
65 (22.5)
X2 = 10.824, df 2, p = 0.009 (fishers)
Discussion
The result of this study carried out among MSM in
Lagos state showed high level of risk factors for
HIV infection namely multiple sexual partnership,
unprotected anal intercourse and transactional sex
even though majority had at least secondary school
level education.
Half of the respondents were homosexual while
47.8% were bisexual, only a third were living
openly as MSM, among the 66.3% not living
openly as MSM, 33.7% were hiding their
orientation from everybody 32.6% from family
members and the remaining from friends and
colleagues. This is similar to the result of a study
carried out in East Africa where 62% had not
disclosed their sexual orientation to family or
friends15 but lower than the 90.7% of respondents
in a Malawi study that kept their sexual orientation
secret from friends and family members16.
Sex work has been shown to play an important
role in HIV transmission and HIV prevalence is
much higher among sex workers and their clients
compared to the low risk population. Several
studies carried out among African MSM have
shown a high proportion engaging in transactional
sex, 74% in Mombasa Kenya17, 53.9% in three
cities in Nigeria18 and 36% in Kano Nigeria19.
No
Frequency (%)
74 (50.3)
117 (85.4)
2 (40.0)
193 (66.8)
Total
147
137
5
289
76 (51.4)
62 (42.5)
5 (100.0)
143 (48.1)
147
139
5
291
112 (76.2)
113 (81.3)
1 (20.0)
226 (77.5)
147
139
5
291
Most of the MSM in this study had past history of
transactional sex, 45.4% had paid for sex in the
past while 50.6% had received money for sex,
among this group; 11.5% were sex workers.
Transactional sex is much higher in this study
population than what was recorded in the result of
the 2008 NDHS which showed that about two
percent of men in the general population reported
paying for sex in the twelve months preceding the
study, this behavior was commoner among young
men 20-29years of age20. It is also higher than the
result of a study conducted in Saint Petersburg's21
where 23% of the MSM had received money for
sex in the past and 21% had paid for sexual
services and the 12.6% of MSM in Almaty the
largest city in Kazakhstan that reported
transactional sex22.
In view of the high biological risk associated
with anal intercourse, unprotected anal intercourse
is a risky behaviour that has been implicated in
HIV transmission while the use of condoms has
been shown to provide protection against sexually
transmitted infections. In a baseline study
conducted among MSM in the state of Andhra
Pradesh in India23. 77% of the MSM reported
condom use at last sex which is higher than the
62.5% obtained in this study, but this figure is
better than the 43.4% of MSM in a 2010 study
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
95
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
carried out in Abuja, Ibadan and Lagos Nigeria 18
who used condom at last sex with a male partner.
Even though condom use was high at last sex
consistent use in the last 10 sexual episodes was
low (40.5%), The result of a systematic review and
meta-analysis conducted on patterns of condom
use among MSM in China in 2011 however
revealed a similar pattern of consistent condom
use of 36.3% between 2006-200824 consistent
condom use has been strongly recommended for
MSM during anal intercourse because evidence
has shown that it reduces HIV transmission by
64% and other STIs by 42% 25. In this study it was
observed that respondents who engage in
transactional sex were more likely to use condoms
which is similar to the result obtained in the
Russian study26.
Accessibility of condoms was not a hindrance
to condom use for majority of MSM in this study
compared to MSM in Egypt and Tunisia where
70.5% and 85.3% respectively had difficulty in
obtaining condoms 27 . The main reasons for not
using condoms were respondents getting carried
away to the point of forgetting or not wanting to
bother, partner opposed condom use and
unavailability of condoms. This is in contrast to
reasons cited by Senegalese MSM in a 2007 study
where the type of relationship, age of partner and
being unemployed were reasons for not using
condom for both homo and heterosexual
intercourse28.
The use of oil-based products including
Vaseline and body cream as lubricants with
condom was reported in a study carried out among
MSM in southern Sub Saharan Africa namely
Malawi, Namibia and Botswana29, this practice
was also common among the MSM in this study
unlike MSM in Nepal where about three quarters
used water based lubricants. A high proportion of
study respondents (85.6%) reported using
lubricants, this is similar to the result of the IBBS
survey conducted in Nepal in 2008 mentioned
above30. Respondents in this study who used
lubricants with condoms were more likely to use it
all the time compared to those that used lubricants
without condom and transgender MSM were more
likely to use saliva as lubricant. The practice of
safe anal sex described here as consistent condom
use with water based lubricants was poor in this
study which is similar to the findings of another
study carried out among MSM in Abuja in 200831.
In this study, respondents who had no formal
education and whose sexual orientation were
bisexual were more likely to conduct transactional
sex this is similar to the findings of a study
conducted in Estonia where socio-demographic
factors including level of education and sexual
orientation of respondents affected their sexual
behaviour32.
There is need for behavioural change to reduce
risky practices which predisposes this group of
MSM to HIV and sexually transmitted infections
because quite a significant proportion of them
practice anal sex with both male and female
partners, transactional sex, inconsistent condom
use and also used inappropriate products as
lubricants.
Contribution of Authors
Concept – Ayoola OO, Sekoni AO, Odeyemi KA
Study Design - Ayoola OO, Sekoni AO, Odeyemi
KA
Data Collection - Ayoola OO
Data Analysis - Ayoola OO, Sekoni AO
Drafting of manuscript and critical review of
intellectual content - Ayoola OO, Sekoni AO,
Odeyemi KA
Final revision for publication - Sekoni AO
References
1. American Foundation for AIDS Research (AMFAR).
AMFAR AIDS Research. Issue Brief No. 4. 2006.
Available at www.amfar.org. Accessed February 18,
2011.
2. United States Agency for International Development
(USAID). Regional Analysis Report; MSM in Eastern
Europe: Implications of a hidden epidemic. November
2010. Available at
http://www.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/health/
docs/msm.pdf. Accessed March 13, 2011.
3. UNAIDS. Best practice collection 2006: HIV and Men who
have Sex with Men in Asia and the Pacific. Available
at http://www.unaids.org. Accessed March 18, 2011
4. UNAIDS. Report on Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Geneva,
UNAIDS. 2002. Available at http://www.unaids.org/
global report. Accessed January 19, 2011.
5. UNAIDS. Report on Global HIV/AIDS Epidemic. Geneva,
UNAIDS. 2010. Available at http://www.unaids.org/
global report. Accessed January 19, 2011.
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
96
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
6. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fact
Sheet on HIV and AIDS among Gay and Bisexual
Men. USA. 2010.
Available at www.cdc.gov.
Accessed February 29, 2011.
7. UNAIDS. UNGASS Country Progress Report: Nigeria.
Geneva, UNAIDS. 2010. Available at http:// www.
unaids.org/en/dataanalysis/monitoringcountryprogress
/2010. Accessed March 22, 2011.
8. Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) Nigeria. Technical
report on the 2010 national HIV sero-prevalence
sentinel survey. FMOH Abuja. 2010:16-20.
9. Vu L, Adebajo S, Tun W, Sheehy M, Karlyn A, Njab J,
Azeez A, Ahonsi B. High HIV Prevalence among
Men who have Sex with Men in Nigeria: Implications
for Combination Prevention. J Acquir Defic Immune
Syndr 2013 Feb 12. [Epub ahead of print].
10. Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH). Nigeria Integrated
Biological and Behavioural Surveillance Survey
IBBSS 2010. FMOH Abuja. 2010:35-73.
11. Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria. Integrated biological
and behavioural surveillance survey (IBBSS) 2007.
FMOH Abuja 2007: 33, 45-47, 100-102.
12. UNAIDS. Factsheet on HIV/AIDS. Available at
http://www.unaids.org/en/regionscountries/regions/we
standcentralafrica/. Accessed on February 16, 2013.
13. WHO/UNAIDS. Prevention and treatment of HIV and
other sexually transmitted infections among men who
have sex with men and transgender people
Recommendations for a public health approach 2011.
WHO Geneva 2011:33.
14. National Population Commission. Nigeria Census results,
2006. Available at www.npc.gov.ng/ Census.
Accessed March 5, 2011.
15. Sharma A, Bukusi E, Gorbach P, Cohen CR, Muga C.
Sexual identity and risk of HIV/STI among men who
have sex with men in Nairobi. Sex Transm Dis 2008;
35(4): 352–354.
16. Ntata PRT, Muula AS, Siziya S. Socio-demographic
characteristics and sexual health related attitudes and
practices of MSM in Central and Southern Malawi;
Tanzania Journal of Health Research 2008;10(3):124130.
17. Sanders EJ, Graham SM, Okuku HS, van der Elst EM,
Muhaari A, Davies A et al. HIV-1 infection in high
risk men who have sex with men in Mombasa, Kenya.
AIDS 2007 30; 21(18):2513-20
18. Lung Vu, Andrinopoulos K, Waimar Tun, Adebajo S.
High levels of unprotected anal intercourse and never
testing for HIV among men who have sex with men in
Nigeria: evidence from a cross-sectional survey for
the need for innovative approaches to HIV prevention.
Sex Transm Infect Online July 2013 doi:
10.1136/sextrans-2013-051065.
19. Merrigan M, Aderemi Azeez A, Bamgboye Afolabi B,
Chabikuli ON, Onyekwena O, Eluwa G et al. HIV
prevalence and risk behaviours among men having
sex with men in Nigeria Sex Transm Infect
2011;87:65e70. doi:10.1136/sti.2008.034991.
20. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and
ICF Macro. 2009. Nigeria Demographic and Health
Survey 2008. Abuja, Nigeria: National Population
Commission and ICF Macro. 2008:231-233.
21. World Health Organization. Europe 2007: HIV Prevalence
and Risks among men who have sex with men in
Moscow and Saint Petersburg. Available at
www.who.org Accessed on September 18 2011.
22. Berry M, Wirtz AL, Janayeva A, Ragoza V, Terlikbayeva
A, Amirov B. Risk Factors for HIV and Unprotected
Anal Intercourse among Men Who Have Sex with
Men (MSM) in Almaty, Kazakhstan. PLOS ONE
2012; 7(8):e43071.
23. Juan-Pablo Gutierrez, McPherson S, Fakoya A, Matheou
A, Bertozzi SM. Community-based prevention leads
to an increase in condom use and a reduction in
sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men
who have sex with men (MSM) and female sex
workers (FSW): the Frontiers Prevention Project
(FPP) evaluation results. BMC Public Health 2010;
10: 497. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-497.
24. Chow EP, Wilson DP, Zhang L. Patterns of Condom Use
Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav
2011. Available at http://www.springerlink.com/
content/nj4w06tp3j5717p1/fulltext.pdf. Accessed April 3,
2011.
25. WHO, UNAIDS, UNDP, MSMGF. Prevention and
treatment of HIV and other STIs among MSM and
transgender people: Recommendations for a public
health approach. WHO Geneva 2011:32.
26. Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Takacs J, Kuznetsova AV,
DiFranceisco WJ, Mocsonaki L, et al. HIV/STD
Prevalence, Risk behaviour, and Substance Use
patterns and predictors in Russian and Hungarian
Socio-centric Social networks of Men who have sex
with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2009; 21 (3): 266 – 279.
27. Mumtaz G, Hilmi N, McFarland W, Kaplan RL, Akala
FA, Semini I, et al. Are HIV Epidemics among Men
Who Have Sex with Men Emerging in the Middle
East and North Africa (MENA)? A Systematic
Review and Data Synthesis. PLoS Med. 2010 Aug;
8(8).e1000444.
28. Larmarange J, Wade AS, Diop AK, Diop O, Gueye K,
Marra A, et al. Men Who Have Sex with Men and
Factors Associated with Not Using a Condom at Last
Sexual Intercourse with a Man and with a Woman in
Senegal. PLoS One 2010; 5(10): 131-189.
29. Baral1 S, Trapence G, Motimedi F, Umar E, Iipinge S,
Dausab F et al. HIV Prevalence, Risks for HIV
Infection, and Human Rights among Men Who Have
Sex with Men (MSM) in Malawi, Namibia, and
Botswana. PLoS ONE 2009; 4(3): e4997.
30. CREHPA/FHI July 2009. Integrated Biological and
Behavioural Surveillance Survey (IBBSS) among
MSM in the Kathmandu Valley Nepal.
31. Strömdahl S, Onigbanjo Williams A, Eziefule B,
Emmanuel G, Iwuagwu S, Anene O et al.
Associations of consistent condom use among men
who have sex with men in Abuja, Nigeria. AIDS Res
Hum Retroviruses 2012; 28(12): 1756-62. doi:
10.1089/AID.2012.0070.
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
97
Ayoola et al.
Risky Sexual Behaviour among MSM
32. Tripathi A, Rüütel K, Parker RD. HIV risk behaviour,
knowledge, substance use and unprotected sex in men
who have sex with men in Tallinn, Estonia.
Eurosurveillance 2009; 14 (48): available at
http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/diseaseprogra
mmes/eurosurveillance. Accessed on March 10, 2011
African Journal of Reproductive Health December 2013 (Special Edition on HIV/AIDS); 17(4):
98