Archives of Oral Biology (2006) 51, 252—261
www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/arob
SHORT COMMUNICATION
The dentin sialoprotein (DSP) expression in rat
tooth germs following fluoride treatment:
An immunohistochemical study
Izabela Maciejewska a,*, Jan Henryk Spodnik b, Sławomir Wójcik b,
Beata Domaradzka-Pytel b, Zdzisław Bereznowski a
a
Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Oral Implantology, 18 Orzeszkowa Str.,
80-208 Gdansk, Poland
b
Medical University of Gdańsk, Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology,
18 Orzeszkowa Str., 80-208 Gdansk, Poland
Accepted 12 July 2005
KEYWORDS
Dentin sialoprotein;
Immunohistochemistry;
Fluorides;
Tooth development
Summary Fluoride is known to alter expression of dentin matrix proteins and affect
their posttranslational modifications.
Objective: The objective of our study was to examine dentin sialoprotein (DSP)
expression in the early and late bell stages of development of the first molar tooth
germs in rats treated with fluoride.
Design and methods: Pregnant dumps were divided into three groups. They were fed
a standard diet and from the fifth day of pregnancy, each group received either tap
water (with trace amounts of fluoride), tap water with a low concentration of
fluoride, or tap water with a high concentration of fluoride. Changes in DSP expression
and distribution were visualized by immunohistochemistry.
Results: Immunoreactivity for DSP was detected in the cervical regions of the early
bell stage in tooth germs of the 1-day-old animals. The earliest reaction was visible in
the control group and the group supplemented with the low fluoride concentration
(FL) but not in the group supplemented with the high fluoride concentration (FH). In
early bell stages across all experimental groups, the immunoreactivity to DSP was
observed in the cusp tip regions and was localized to preameloblasts, young and
mature odontoblasts, dental pulp cells, predentin, and dentin. Generally, more
intense positive staining for DSP was detected in animals supplemented with the
high fluoride concentration. In the late bell stage found in the 4-day-old control group
and the group supplemented with the low fluoride concentration, immunoreactivity
for DSP was less intense compared with younger animals. However, immunoreactivity
was greater in the group treated with the high dose of fluoride. In this group, the
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +48 58 349 16 20; fax: +48 58 349 16 20.
E-mail address: Izabelam@amg.gda.pl (I. Maciejewska).
0003–9969/$ — see front matter # 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2005.07.003
DSP expression in rat tooth germs after fluoride treatment
253
positive immunostaining for DSP, especially in young ameloblasts, was prolonged and
relatively strong.
Conclusions: Fluoride supplementation causes changes in the developmental pattern
of DSP expression and its distribution in rat tooth germs.
# 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Since dental fluorosis has been recognized as a side
effect of fluoride caries prevention, research efforts
have been focused on identifying fluoride-susceptible points of odontogenesis.1—4 Fluoride delays proteolytic degradation and removal of amelogenin,
an enamel non-collagenous protein, during the
maturation stage of amelogenesis.5 Amelogenin
removal is a prerequisite for proper enamel mineralization; however, the manner in which fluoride
influences the metabolism of amelogenin remains
unclear. It is postulated that fluoride may change
the molecular conformation of the protein and subsequently enhance its binding to fluoridated enamel
crystals.6,7 It is also suggested that fluoride
diminishes the free Ca2+ concentration in the vicinity of the crystals, thus decreasing Ca2+-sensitive
protease activity.8 The impact of fluoride on ameloblasts is also considerable. It has been shown that
even low concentrations of fluoride slow down ameloblast proliferation9 as well as the transformation
of smooth-ended into ruffle-ended ameloblasts,10
which alters their functional efficiency.
Fluoride adversely influences dentin formation as
well. Although dentin, unlike enamel, is derived
from mesenchyme, dentin fluorosis may be caused
by local disturbances that take place in the dentin
extracellular matrix. Dentinogenesis involves secretion of mainly type I collagen and several noncollagenous proteins to form a collagenous scaffold.
Next, carbonate apatite crystals are deposited on
the existing scaffold. Dentin phosphoprotein (DPP)
and dentin sialoprotein (DSP) are two types of dentin non-collagenous matrix proteins. These proteins
were originally thought to be dentin-specific until
Qin et al.11 described their presence in bone tissue.
The bone concentration of DSP was found to be four
hundred fold lower than that in dentin.11 Nucleotide
sequences of DPP and DSP are localized next to each
other and encode the single DSPP transcript. The
DSPP gene was found on chromosome 5 in humans12
and chromosome 4 in rats.13 The secreted parent
DSPP protein is then proteolitically cleaved to yield
DPP and DSP.
DPP has been confirmed as the main non-collagenous dentin specific matrix protein, responsible for
the nucleation and mineralization of dentin.14—17
Recent studies indicate that fluoride drastically
decreases the phosphorylation of DPP.18,19 Most
likely, fluoride does not affect DPP directly. Available data indicate that fluoride impairs action of
casein kinase II and alkaline phosphatase, two
enzymes which are involved in DPP phosphorylation.19 The decrease in DDP phosphorylation leads
to the reduction of Ca2+-binding abilities and ultimately to hypomineralization of dentin.
DSP is the second most abundant non-collagenous
dentin protein.20,21 Its function in odontogenesis is
still obscure. However, DSP’s unique expression in
odontoblasts and predentin just before the onset of
mineralization suggests that it may participate in
dentin formation.22,23 DSP is also thought to be a
factor in the conversion of unmineralized dentin
matrix into mineralized tissue.24 The fact that
DSP is coded together with DPP as one transcript
known as DSPP25 could be regarded as an argument
in favor of these presumptions. However, there is
evidence that ‘‘all of the phosphorylation sites were
located at the parts of transcripts containing the
DPP coding information.’’12 Recent data demonstrate that DSP has a limited effect on the formation
of hydroxyapatite,26 suggesting that DSP can play a
regulatory role in dentinogenesis.
Considering DSP’s role in dentin formation and
assuming that fluoride given during pregnancy is
freely transferred through the placenta to the offspring,27,28 the aim of our study was to investigate
the potential changes in DSP developmental expression and its localization pattern in tooth germs of
rats supplemented with different doses of sodium
fluoride in drinking water during prenatal life and
post delivery. We focused our study on the expression of DSP in newly differentiated cells, e.g.,
preodontoblasts, young odontoblasts, and preameloblasts. In addition, we investigated the formation
of dentin matrix in both early and late bell stages
of the lower first molar tooth germs in 1- and 4-dayold animals, respectively. As with other investigators, we defined young odontoblasts as polarized
cells associated with early predentin formation.
Mature odontoblasts were defined as those whose
Tomes’ processes are embedded in mineralized
dentin.29,30 The 4-day-old groups allowed us to
follow changes in the DSP expression pattern under
the same experimental conditions. We decided to
investigate the lower first molar tooth germ assuming that it is better model for potential comparison
254
I. Maciejewska et al.
to other species than the continuously growing rat
incisor.
Material and methods
Animals
Animal care and treatment guidelines outlined by
the European Community Council (1986) and protocols approved by the local ethical committee were
followed.
Nine pregnant albino Wistar rats were randomly
divided into three equal groups: control (C), supplemented with a low concentration of sodium
fluoride in drinking water (FL), and supplemented
with a high concentration of sodium fluoride in
drinking water (FH). Dams were fed a standard diet
containing a trace amount of fluoride. From the fifth
day of pregnancy until the end of the experiment,
the three groups drank water that contained: control group–—0.16 F mg/l (tap water), low-concentration sodium fluoride group–—tap water with 11 mg/l
of NaF (fluoride content 5.14 mg/l), and high-concentration of sodium fluoride group–—tap water with
110 mg/l of NaF (fluoride content 49.96 mg/l).
Sodium fluoride concentrations followed the protocol used in our previous investigations32,33 and
others.34 The high sodium fluoride concentration
was calculated according to the mean body weight
of dams (22.6 mg NaF/kg b.w.) and was the maximal
dose at which the risk of spontaneous abortion or
preterm delivery was smallest.35 Water consumption was monitored daily. After delivery mothers and
their offspring underwent the same water regime.
The experiment was performed three times. The
mean weight of pups in each group is shown in
Table 1.
Tissues
On days 1 and 4, animals were deeply anaesthetized
with Nembutal (80 mg/kg i.p. body weight) and
perfused through the ascending aorta with physio-
Table 1 Comparison of the body weight of 1- and 4day-old pups in particular groups: C–—control, FL–—the
group supplemented with the low fluoride concentration, and FH–—the group supplemented with the high
fluoride concentration.
P1
P4
C
FL
FH
7.30 0.93
12.08 1.30
7.96 0.53
10.61 2.90
7.63 0.87
11.57 1.51
Data in grams, mean value S.D.
logical saline (pH 7.4) with heparin, followed by
perfusion of 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate
buffer (pH 7.4; 4 8C). After decapitation, heads
were postfixed for 1 h at 4 8C and dehydrated in
15% sucrose followed by 30% sucrose (both in 0.1 M
phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 and 4 8C) until sunk. It
was not necessary to demineralize the tissue, which
is known to abolish immunostaining for DSP.31 The
tissue was then frozen and sectioned sagittally into
16-mm-thick serial sections using a cryostat (Young
1800; Leica, Germany). Every sixth section was
routinely stained with hematoxylin eosin (H&E),
air-dried, and cover slipped with DPX mounting
medium (Fluka, Germany).
Immunohistochemistry
Sections were preincubated in 10% normal goat
serum and 0.1% solution of Triton X-100. They were
then incubated for 1.5 h at room temperature with
rabbit polyclonal antibodies against dentin sialoprotein DSP diluted 1:100.36 Subsequently, they were
incubated in secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit
conjugated with Cy-3 (Jackson, USA) at 1:600 for 2 h
at room temperature. Sections were rinsed in PBS,
mounted on slides, dried, and coverslipped with
Kaiser gelatin (Merck, USA). In the control sections,
the primary anti-DSP antibodies were omitted and
replaced by buffer. In all the investigated groups
either 1 or 4 days of age, the controlled sections
stained without anti-DSP antibodies showed none
DSP positive immunoreactivity in all the investigated structures (not shown).
Data analysis
Immunohistochemically stained sections were
examined with confocal laser microscopy (Radiance
2100; Bio-Rad, UK). The system was equipped with
krypton/argon lasers and mounted on an Eclipse 600
(Nikon, Japan) microscope, using the software
LaserSharp 2000 v. 4.0 (Bio-Rad). The confocal laser
scanning microscopy (CLSM) images were obtained
using 20 and 60 oil immersion objective lenses of
NA = 1.3 and 1.4, respectively. Statistical analysis
was performed by means of the computer program
Statistica v. 5.0 (Statsoft, USA) and Excel 2000
(Microsoft, USA) in the following manner. All calculations were performed on spreadsheets. Data of the
test fields from each case were collected and the
mean value calculated. These averaged values were
used as raw data for statistical analysis. The oneway analysis of variance followed by post hoc honest
significant difference (HSD) test was applied to
estimate the differences between results for various
age groups, as this test is robust against deviations
DSP expression in rat tooth germs after fluoride treatment
255
from the assumed population normality and homogeneity of variances. Because the aim of the study
was to analyze the changes of immunoreactivity
with increasing age, the differences among only
consecutive pairs of means were taken into account
(although this multiple comparison test calculates
the significance level for all possible comparisons).
For each experimental group descriptive statistics
were calculated and analyzed as mean values with
standard deviation ( S.D.). The alpha-level was set
at 0.05 for statistical significance.
Results
Water consumption
Daily water consumption differed in each group. The
differences were statistically significant between
the control and the group supplemented with low
doses of sodium fluoride ( p < 0.05) as well as
between the control and the group supplemented
with high doses of sodium fluoride ( p < 0.001)
(Fig. 1).
DSP expression in the early bell stage
(1-day-old groups)
The first positive signal of DSP expression appeared
in the early bell stage of the control group. The
signal was detected at the basal pole of preameloblasts from the cervical loop region of the first molar
tooth germ (Fig. 2A). The same region stained very
weakly in the group supplemented with the low
concentration of sodium fluoride (FL) (Fig. 2B) and
was almost immunonegative in the group supplemented with the high concentration of sodium fluoride (FH) (Fig. 2C). In the more developmentally
Figure 1 Water consumption in C–—control, FL–—group
treated with low fluoride concentration, and FH–—group
treated with high concentration of fluoride. The significance level according to control group: *p < 0.05 and
**
p < 0.001.
Figure 2 DSP localization in early bell stage of first
molar tooth germ (cervical loop region) from (A) control
group, (B) FL group, and (C) FH group. Preameloblasts stain
weakly positive in C and FL groups. Preameloblasts from FH
group are negative. Abbreviations: ab, alveolar bone; dp,
dental pulp; pa, preameloblasts. Scale bar 50 mm.
256
I. Maciejewska et al.
Figure 3 DSP expression in 1-day-old first molar tooth germ, the cusp tip region. (A and B) the control group (C): young
odontoblasts, mature odontoblasts, dental pulp, and predentin (pd) stain strongly. Mineralizing dentin stains at the
moderately (d). Preameloblasts are weakly positive for DSP; (C and D) the group supplemented with the low fluoride
concentration (FL): young odontoblasts, odontoblasts, dental pulp, and predentin (pd) stain strongly. Mineralizing
dentin (d) stains moderately. Preameloblasts are weakly positive for DSP antibodies. Alveolar bone is negative. (E and F)
the group supplemented with the high fluoride concentration (FH): young odontoblasts (yo), dental pulp, and predentin
DSP expression in rat tooth germs after fluoride treatment
advanced parts of the first molar tooth germ (the
cusp tip), young polarized odontoblasts, adjacent to
predentin, showed a strong DSP immunopositive
reaction similar in all water groups (Fig. 3). This
staining could not be detected in the rest of the
examined groups. Mature odontoblasts immunostained for DSP in all investigated groups; however,
in the FL and FH groups, the staining was more
intense. In the control group, preameloblasts associated with early predentin but not dentin were
weakly immunopositive for DSP (Fig. 3A and B),
while in both fluoride-treated groups (FL and FH),
ameloblasts lining dentin were weakly DSP positive
as well (Fig. 3C—F). In the FH group, DSP staining of
ameloblasts was much more intense (Fig. 3E and F)
than those in other groups. The strong positive
staining for DSP was also detected in the dental
pulp cells in all experimental groups; however, some
cells stained more intensely than others.
Predentin in all groups showed very intense staining, but the staining decreased in dentin as mineralization progressed. The greater homogeneity in
the predentin immunostaining was observed in the
control group (Fig. 3A and B) and decreased in the FL
(Fig. 3C and D) and FH (Fig. 3E and F) groups,
respectively. The widest layer of predentin and
dentin was observed in the FH group (Fig. 3E and
F), but the structure of both tissues, especially
predentin, showed the presence of some specific
‘‘empty spaces.’’
DSP expression in the late bell stage
(4-day-old groups)
All examined tooth germs at the late bell stages
showed changes in the intensity of staining. The
positive reaction for DSP antibodies at the cervical
loop region of the first molar tooth germs became
more visible in all groups (Fig. 4A—C). In the cervical
loop region, the positive signal for DSP also
appeared in the FH group. In the control group,
odontoblasts stained weaker (Fig. 4D) than those
from the fluoride-treated groups of the same age
and younger controls. The immunopositive reaction
for DSP in predentin was still very intense but
weaker than in both FL (Fig. 4E) and FH (Fig. 4F)
groups. Dentin from the control group stained
strongly at the mineralization front; the intensity
of staining decreased proportionally as mineralization progressed (Fig. 4D). In the fluoride-treated
groups, (Fig. 4E and F) the intensely stained layer
257
of dentin was visibly wider. In all investigated groups
dental pulp showed diminished immunoreactivity
for DSP in comparison with the 1-day-old groups.
However, the least reduction in immunoreactivity
was observed in the FH group (Fig. 4F). In all groups,
either enamel or ameloblasts were almost completely immunonegative. The only weakly positive
reaction for DSP in ameloblasts could be found in
the FH group (Fig. 4F).
Discussion
The DSP expression pattern in tooth germs of rats
treated with different concentrations of sodium
fluoride during prenatal and early postnatal life
differs between early and late bell stages of tooth
development. These differences were also observed
in the control group and groups supplemented with
sodium fluoride in drinking water.
In the early bell stage (1-day-old animals), the
DSP-positive reaction was detected in young,
mature odontoblasts and preameloblasts in all
groups. This finding was previously reported,29,31
although the reaction in odontoblasts from the FH
group was weaker than that of the C and FL groups.
Conversely, at the late bell stage (4-day-old animals) the reaction in odontoblasts from the control
group was weaker than that of both fluoride-supplemented groups. Surprisingly, in the 1-day-old FH
group, preodontoblasts lining the basement membrane were positive for DSP antibodies. This observation contradicts the classic DSP expression
pattern established in previous investigations29,31
as well as our own results obtained from the control
group. Additionally, there was no DSP immunoreactivity in preodontoblasts from any of the investigated 4-day-old groups with late bell stages of tooth
development.
The positive DSP expression in 1-day-old preodontoblasts from the FH group suggests the existence of disturbances in their development. Some
recent studies have demonstrated that fluoride has
an adverse effect on the morphology, proliferation, and function of ameloblasts.37,38,8—10 In our
study, the first positive reaction for DSP was
detected in the ameloblastic cell lineage. In the
early bell stage, the preameloblasts were found to
be weakly stained at the cervical loop region in the
control and the FL group. However, DSP expression
was not found in the FH group, which is a novel
stain strongly. Predentin shows specific ‘‘empty spaces’’ (arrowheads). Mineralizing dentin stains moderately (d).
Odontoblasts stain very intensely. Preameloblasts and tall ameloblasts are weakly positive for DSP antibodies. Young
odontoblasts stain moderately (yo), preodontoblasts are weakly positive (po). Alveolar bone (ab) is negative. Scale bar
50 mm.
258
I. Maciejewska et al.
Figure 4 DSP localization in 4-day-old first molar tooth germ (apical region) from (A) the control group (C):
odontoblasts and dentin show moderate staining. Predentin is strongly immunopositive for DSP (pd). Alveolar bone,
ameloblasts (a), enamel (e) and dental pulp are negative and (B) the group supplemented with the low sodium fluoride
concentration: odontoblasts and predentin (arrow) are strongly immunopositive. Mineralizing dentin (d) stains
moderately but more intense than those in the control group. Preameloblast (arrow), ameloblasts, and dental
pulp are faintly positive for DSP antibodies. Alveolar bone is negative, (C) the group supplemented with the
DSP expression in rat tooth germs after fluoride treatment
finding not yet reported. The lack of reactivity to
DSP in the early bell stages was probably caused by
delay in the embryonic development observed in
groups of animals treated with the high sodium
fluoride concentration.
In the FH group, the positive staining for DSP in
preameloblasts from the apical area comparable to
other groups (C and FL) became visible at the late
bell stage (4-day-old animals). In our study, like
others,29,30 preameloblasts at the cusp tip region
in all 4-day-old groups were also immunopositive for
DSP. It has been previously noted that positive
immunostaining for DSP in the ameloblastic cell
lineage is transient and rapidly diminishes immediately after the onset of dentin mineralization.31 In
our study, the prolonged positive reaction for DSP
was observed even after the onset of dentin mineralization in both fluoride-supplemented 4-day-old
groups but not in controls. The positive DSP reaction
was especially prolonged in the FH group. The prolonged expression of DSP in ameloblasts suggests
that fluoride somehow modifies the DSP expression
in ameloblastic lineage cells. These changes may
reflect a direct effect of fluoride on ameloblasts or
an indirect effect of fluoride-dependent changes in
DSP posttranslational modifications.
Another conspicuous feature observed in our
investigation was the height of ameloblasts from
the FH group. Ameloblasts were much taller than
those from other groups. We believe that this observation is the result of disturbances in ameloblast
development. Unfortunately, we were not able to
assess the exact intracellular changes with the confocal microscope. The presumption that fluoride
could alter ameloblast development is in agreement
with previous findings by Smith et al.,37 who
observed that ameloblasts associated with developing fluorotic enamel remain ruffle-ended longer
than controls. Similar to Linde,39 we detected a
strong immunopositive reaction for DSP in cells of
dental pulp for all early bell stages. In our investigation, the staining in dental pulp cells decreased
consistently in the late bell stage from all investigated groups, although specific cells stained more
intensely than others. Nevertheless, because of the
complete lack of differences in the staining intensity in investigated 1- and/or 4-day-old groups, as
well as the proved absence of DSP-mRNA transcripts
in the dental pulp cells in all developmental
stages,30 we believe that some of the proteins present in dental pulp cells may contain epitopes recognizable by polyclonal DSP antibodies that we used in
259
our experiment. In 1-day-old animals from all groups
both predentin and dentin showed positive immunostaining to DSP comparable to those observed in
the previous study29,30 however, the homogeneity of
the tissues differed. In dentin from the FH group of
both ages we observed unusual, specific empty gap
like structures, which disturbances in tissue formation similar to those observed by Appleton.40 Conversely, in the 4-day-old control group, DSP
expression in predentin and dentin was still consistent with its developmental pattern (the positive
staining decreased in dentin proportionally to its
mineralization progress), while in both groups treated with fluoride the width of strongly positively
stained dentin was conspicuously greater.
Based on the findings of our study, we conclude
that fluoride supplementation during prenatal and
early postnatal life can induce the modifications in
the DSP developmental expression pattern in rat
tooth germs. High-dose fluoride supplementation
in the earliest stages of odontogenesis is most likely
responsible for the positive immunoreactivity for
DSP antibodies in preodontoblasts. Concurrently,
it appears that fluoride causes the prolonged
expression of DSP in ameloblasts, most likely due
to fluoride-dependent disturbances in their development. This may affect reciprocal mesenchymal—
epithelial interactions and leads subsequently to
altered dentin and/or enamel mineralization pattern. It is still not known whether prolonged DSP
expression in ameloblasts is caused by direct, fluoride-dependent cellular impairment or whether
fluoride influences DSP posttranslational modifications.
The role of DSP in odontogenesis remains
unknown. Thus, it is difficult to hypothesize about
the direct impact of prolonged DSP expression on
dentin formation. However, resent studies indicate
a chaperone function of DSP in folding and transporting parental DSPP molecule. DSP also may play a
role in downregulating the amount of DPP delivered
to the mineralization front.41 This may suggest that
the fluoride-dependent prolonged expression of DSP
could possibly result in lower concentration of DPP
at the mineralization front causing a delay in
nucleation of apatite crystals and dentin mineralization. Thus, further investigations should focus on
elucidating the role that DSP plays in dentinogenesis
and possible fluoride-induced changes in the molecular conformation of DSP. An additional question to
be answered is whether fluoride’s effect on DSP
expression is dose-dependent.
high sodium fluoride concentration. Odontoblasts (o) and predentin (pd) stain strongly. Dentin (d) and dental pulp
(dp) stain moderately. Ameloblasts (a) are tall and faintly positive for DSP. Alveolar bone (ab) is negative. Scale bar
50 mm.
260
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dr. W.T. Butler for providing anti-DSP antibodies and his kind suggestions for
improving the manuscript, and Ms. Sylwia Scisłowska, MA, for the preparation of illustrations.
References
1. Murray JJ, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Jenkins GN. Fluorides in caries
prevention. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Butterworth-Heinemann;
1999.
2. Fejerskov O, Manji F, Baelum V. The nature and mechanism of
dental fluorosis in man. J Dent Res 1990;69:692—700.
3. Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ, Richards A, Baelum V. Dental tissue
effects of fluoride. Adv Dent Res 1994;8:15—31.
4. Vieira AP, Hancock R, Limeback H, Maia R, Grynpas MD. Is
fluoride concentration in dentin and enamel a good indicator
of dental fluorosis? J Dent Res 2004;83:76—80.
5. DenBesten PK. Effects of fluoride on protein secretion and
removal during enamel development in the rat. J Dent Res
1986;65:1272—7.
6. Tanabe T, Aoba T, Moreno EC, Fukae M. Effects of fluoride in
apatitic lattice on adsorption of enamel proteins onto calcium apatites. J Dent Res 1988;67:536—42.
7. Aoba T. Strategies for improving the assessment of dental
fluorosis: focus on chemical and biochemical aspects. Adv
Dent Res 1994;8:66—74.
8. Aoba T, Fejerskov O. Dental fluorosis, chemistry and biology.
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:155—70.
9. DenBesten P, Gao C, Li W. Effect of micromolar levels of
fluoride on ameloblasts in vitro. IADR/AADR/CADR 82nd general session Hawaii 2004, 10—13 March 2004.
10. Den Besten PK, Crenshow MA, Wilson MH. Changes in the
fluoride-induced modulation of maturation stage ameloblasts
of rats. J Dent Res 1985;64:1365—70.
11. Qin C, Brunn JC, Cadena E, Ridall A, Tsujigiwa H, Nagatsuka
N, et al. The expression of dentin sialophosphoprotein gene
in bone. J Dent Res 2002;81:392—4.
12. MacDougall M, Simmons D, Luan X, Nydegger J, Feng J, Gu
TT. Dentin phosphoprotein and dentin sialoprotein are cleavage products expressed from a single transcript coded by a
gene on human chromosome 4. J Biol Chem 1997;272:
835—42.
13. Feng JQ, Luan X, Wallace J, Jing D, Ohsima T, Kulkarni AB,
et al. Genomic organization, chromosomal mapping
and promoter analysis of mouse dentin sialophosphoprotein
(Dspp) gene, which codes for both dentin sialoprotein
and dentin phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem 1998;273:9457—
64.
14. Traub W, Jodaikin A, Arad T, Veis A, Sabsay B. Dentin phosphophoryn binding to collagen fibrils. Matrix 1992;12:197—
201.
15. Steller-Stevenson WG, Veis A. Type I collagen shows a specific
binding affinity for bovine dentin phosphophoryn. Calcif
Tissue Int 1986;38:135—41.
16. Wallwork ML, Kirkham J, Chen H, Chang SX, Robinson C, Smith
DA, et al. Binding of dentin noncollagenous matrix proteins to
biological mineral crystals: an atomic force microscopy
study. Calcif Tissue Int 2002;71:249—55.
17. Marsh ME. Binding of calcium and phosphate ions to dentin
phosphophoryn. Biochemistry 1989;28:346—52.
I. Maciejewska et al.
18. Milan AM, Waddington RJ, Embery G. Altered phosphorylation
of rat dentine phosphoproteins by fluoride in vivo. Calcif
Tissue Int 1999;64:234—8.
19. Milan AM, Waddington RJ, Embery G. Fluoride alters casein
kinase II and alkaline phosphatase activity in vitro with
potential implications for dentine mineralization. Arch Oral
Biol 2001;46:343—51.
20. Butler WT. Dentin matrix proteins. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;
106(Suppl. 1):204—10.
21. Butler WT, Ritchie H. The nature and functional significance
of dentin extracellular Matrix proteins. Int J Dev Biol
1995;39:169—79.
22. Watanabe E, Takano Y. Ca-binding domains in the odontoblast
layer of rat molars and incisors under normal and pathological
conditions. Arch Histol Cytol 2002;65:337—46.
23. Begue-Kirn C, Krebsbach PH, Bartlett JD, Butler WT. Dentin
sialoprotein, dentin phosphoprotein, enamelysin and ameloblastin, tooth-specific molecules that are distinctively
expressed during murine dental differentiation. Eur J Oral
Sci 1998;106:963—70.
24. Butler WT, Brunn JC, Qin C, McKee MD. Extracellular Matrix
proteins and the dynamics of dentin formation. Connect
Tissue Res 2002;43:301—7.
25. Gu K, Chang S, Ritchie HH, Clarkson BH, Rutherford RB.
Molecular cloning of a human dentin sialophosphoprotein
gene. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:35—42.
26. Boskey A, Spevak L, Tan M, Doty SB, Butler WT. Dentin
sialoprotein (DSP) has limited effects on in vitro apatite
formation and growth. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;67:472—8.
27. Caldera R, Chavinie J, Fermanian J, Tortrat D, Laurent AM.
Maternal-fetal transfer of fluoride in pregnant women. Biol
Neonate 1988;54:263—9.
28. Bawden JW, Deaton TG, Koch GG, Crawford BP. Effect of
acute maternal fluoride dose on fetal plasma fluoride level
and enamel fluoride uptake in guinea pigs. J Dent Res
1989;68:1169—72.
29. D’Souza RN, Bronckers AL, Happonen RP, Doga DA, FarachCarson MC, Butler WT. Developmental expression of 53KD
dentin sialoprotein in rat tooth organs. J Histochem Cytochem 1992;40:359—66.
30. Ritchie HH, Berry JE, Somerman MJ, Hanks CT, Bronckers AL,
Hotton D, et al. Dentin sialoprotein (DSP) transcripts, developmentally-sustained expression in odontoblasts and transient expression in preameloblasts. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:
405—13.
31. Bronckers AL, D’Souza RN, Butler WT, Lyaruu DM, van Dijk S,
Gay S, et al. Dentin sialoprotein: biosynthesis and developmental appearance in rat tooth germs in comparison with
amelogenins, osteocalcin and collagen type-I. Cell Tissue Res
1993;272:237—47.
32. Maciejewska I, Adamowicz-Klepalska B. Effects of diet and
fluoride on early phases of odontogenesis in rats. Folia
Morphol 2000;59:37—42.
33. Maciejewska I, Adamowicz-Klepalska B, Kmieć Z, Dziewia
˛tkowski J. Influence of diet and fluoride on dentin and enamel
deposition and maturation in rats. Folia Morphol 2000;
59:131—6.
34. Mauer JK, Cheng MC, Byron GB, Anderson RL. Two-year
carcinogenity study of fluoride rats. J Natl Cancer Inst
1990;82:1118—26.
35. Al-Hiyasat AS, Elbetieha AM, Darmani H. Reproductive toxic
effects of ingestion of sodium fluoride in female rats. Fluoride 2000;33:79—84.
36. Butler WT, Bhown M, Brunn JC, D’Souza RN, Farach-Carson
MC, Happonen RP, et al. Isolation, characterization and
immunolocalization of a 53-kDal dentin sialoprotein (DSP).
Matrix 1992;12:343—51.
DSP expression in rat tooth germs after fluoride treatment
37. Smith CE, Nanci A, DenBesten PK. Effects of chronic fluoride
exposure on morphometric parameters defining the stages of
amelogenesis and ameloblast modulation in rat incisors. Anat
Rec 1993;237:243—58.
38. Monsour PA, Harbrow DJ, Warshawsky H. Effects of acute
doses of fluoride on the morphology and the detectable
calcium associated with secretory ameloblasts in the rat
incisors. J Histochem Cytochem 1989;37:463—71.
261
39. Linde A. The extracellular matrix of the dental pulp and
dentin. J Dent Res 1985;64:523—9.
40. Appleton J. Formation and structure of dentin in the rat
incisor after chronic exposure to sodium fluoride. Scanning
Microsc 1994;8:711—9.
41. Butler WT, Brunn JC, Qin C, McKee MD. Extracellular matrix
proteins and dynamics of dentin formation. Connect Tissue
Int 2002;43:301—7.