PERSPECTIVES ON...
· Prospect for Development of Open
Access in Argentina
by Sandra Miguel, Paola C. Bongiovani,
Nancy D. Gómez and Gema Bueno-de-la-Fuente
Available online
This perspective article presents an overview
of the Open Access movement in Argentina,
from a global and regional (Latin American)
context. The article describes the evolution
and current state of initiatives by examining
two principal approaches to Open Access in
Argentina: golden and green roads. The article
will then turn its attention to: the support
that Open Access receives from
governmental sources; collaboration with
international projects; and the perspective of
Argentine authors regarding Open Access
and self-archiving. It concludes with a
reflection on the outlook, the main barriers
and opportunities for Open Access in
Argentina.
Sandra Miguel,
Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales y
Departamento de Bibliotecología, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias
de la Educación, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina
Grupo de Investigación SCImago, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
<sandra@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar>,
<http://www.scimago.es>;
Paola C. Bongiovani,
Centro Internacional Franco Argentino de Ciencias de la Información y de
Sistemas (CIFASIS), Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
<pbongio@unr.edu.ar>;
Nancy D. Gómez,
Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación,
Facultad de Humanidades, Comunicación y Documentación,
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
Tel.: +34 648688522.
<ndgomez@bib.uc3m.es>;
Gema Bueno-de-la-Fuente,
Departamento de Biblioteconomía y Documentación,
Facultad de Humanidades, Comunicación y Documentación,
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
<gbueno@bib.uc3m.es>.
The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Volume 39, Number 1, pages 1–2
INTRODUCTION
In a world where access to information is fundamental for the economic
and social growth of a country, the Open Access (OA) movement is
establishing itself as a model for publishing scientific and academic
literature which offers open and free access to publications through the
internet.1 The two best developed approaches are: the golden road of
publication in journals which are OA; and the green road, self-archiving
on the internet of articles published in traditional subscription-based
journals. Self-archiving occurs before (pre-print) or after (post-print)
the publication of the journal, depending largely on the editors'
copyright rules.
It is not clear which approach will predominate in the near future.
Harnad and others2 suggest that providing a mandate for the green road
is the only way to reach 100% OA, as it does not require a substantive
change in the system of scientific publishing. Suber3 suggests the two
approaches should complement one another: publishing opportunities
on the golden road are limited to the 30% of journals published as OA,
while some people take advantage of the green road's benefits of a
low-cost and rapid transition to publications being freely accessible
online.
Recent international studies show there is still a low proportion of
articles freely available. A study of articles published in journals included
in the Web of Science shows only 23.4% are freely available on the web:
21% of these through the green road, 2.4% through the golden road.4
Moreover it is impossible to generalize. The two approaches show levels
of development which vary according to both the field and geography.5,6
In the latter case the policies of governments and of research funders
have significant influence.7,8
The new modes of publication and diffusion of research outcomes,
along with their political, economic, social and cultural impact are the
subject of many discussions. Not only do these occur within the
scientific community, but also in the publishing market and among
research funding agencies and national governments. Within this
context the present work offers an overview of the current state and
outlook for development of the OA movement in Argentina.
CURRENT STATE
AND
PRINCIPAL TRENDS
ARGENTINA
OF
OPEN ACCESS
IN
In Argentina, both the green and golden road approaches to OA have
shown notable growth in the last few years. On the golden road, 92
Argentine journals are included in SciELO—Scientific Electronic Library
Online,9 42 in RedALyC (Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y
el Caribe, España y Portugal)10 and 126 in DOAJ (Directory of Open
Access Journals).11 Although these figures represent a small fraction of
global Open Access journals, the growth over the last 5 years–67% in
DOAJ and 114% in SciELO12–indicates a significant progress of this
approach in Argentina.
1
The number of repositories used for green road publication has also
grown notably in the last few years. According to ROAR (Registry of
Open Access Repositories), Argentina went from two repositories in
200713 to 24 in 2012.14 In OpenDoar,15 the Argentine presence in the
region is 11%, and in CSIC's Ranking Web de Repositorios Mundiales16
it is the second-most represented country in Latin America, behind
Brazil.
The Ministry of Science and Technology (MINCyT) plays an active
role in the development of the Open Access movement in Argentina. The
Ministry created a National System of Digital Repositories and then
lobbied for government regulation promoting the creation of repositories and self-archiving of scientific results from publicly funded
research.17 By May 2012, a law supporting this initiative was approved
by the National Chamber of Deputies.18
In addition, MINCyT and the National Interuniversity Council (CIN)
allocated a specific line of its funding for research to the development of
digital institutional repositories. In 2012, five projects were underway
across Argentina with participation from approximately 60% of the
country's universities, and leading role is being played by academic
libraries.
Recent studies of communication practices among Argentine
researchers show a progressive outlook. Of articles published in 2008–
2010 in journals listed in SCOPUS, 27% are OA through golden road
publication, and 43% could be self-archived in green road Open Access
repositories. The proportion varies between disciplines: Social Sciences,
Humanities and Medicine show a preference for the golden road, while
the green road predominates in Physics, Astronomy, Agriculture and
Biological Sciences.19
Argentine researchers hold a very favorable opinion of OA. The
survey carried out in 2010 as part of the SOAP (Study of Open Access
Publishing) project20 shows that a high proportion (71%) of Argentine
researchers in diverse subject areas are aware of OA journals in their
field of expertise, and are in favor of the OA movement, because they
believe that it benefits the scientific community.21
CONCLUSIONS
Argentina has a great potential to offer a significant proportion of its
scientific journal publication in OA, but this is far from the reality yet.
The green road is promoted through national policies creating a
mandate for self-archiving of the national scientific and technological
production at institutional repositories and providing funding to that
end. The golden road, through the inclusion and indexing of Argentine
scientific journals is leading regional OA portals such as SciELO and
RedALyC.
Which approach to OA will be more successful in Argentina? Only
time will tell. It will depend on the development of the national mandate
and its success and on the progress of OA globally and its repercussions
in the international and national scientific communities. While
government promotion and the attitude of researchers suggest a
favorable future for OA in Argentina, a great deal of work remains to
ensure democratization of and free global access to scientific knowledge. In this effort, the role of libraries and librarians will continue to be
fundamental.22
REFERENCES
1. Budapest Open Access Initiative, Open Society Institute, Budapest
(2001). http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
2. Stevan Harnad, Tim Brody, François Vallieres, Leslie Carr, Steve
Hitchcock, Yves Gingras, Charles Oppenheim, Chawki Hajjem,
Eberhardt Hilf, “The access/impact problem and the green and
gold roads to open access: An update,” Serials Review 34, no. 1
(2008), pp. 36-40, Available: (September 9, 2012).
2
The Journal of Academic Librarianship
3. Peter Suber, “Ensuring open access for publicly funded research,”
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 345 (2012), Available: http://dx.doi.org/
10.1136/bmj.e5184, (September 9, 2012).
4. Yassine Gargouri, Vincent Larivière, Yves Gingras, Les Carr, Stevan
Harnad, Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by
Discipline, (2012), Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3664,
(September 9, 2012).
5. Bo-Christer Björk, Patrik Welling, Mikael Laakso, Peter Majlender,
Turid Hedlund, Guðni Guðnason, “Open access to the scientific journal
literature: Situation 2009,” PLoS ONE, 5, no. 6 (2010), Available:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011273, (September 9, 2012).
6. Sandra Miguel, Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Félix de Moya-Anegón,
“Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from
the standpoint of access,” Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 62, no. 6 (2011), pp. 1130–1145.
7. Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA) http://www.arl.org/
sparc/advocacy/frpaa/index.shtml
8. Peter Suber, “Tectonic movements toward OA in the UK and
Europe,” SPARC Open Access Newsletter (September 9, 2012),
Available: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/0902-12.htm#uk-ec, (September 9, 2012).
9. Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) http://www.scielo.org/
10. Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y
Portugal (RedALyC) http://redalyc.uaemex.mx.
11. Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) http://www.doaj.org.
12. Nancy Diana Gómez, Paola Bongiovani, “Open access and A2K:
Collaborative experiences”, in Latin American in Libraries Driving Access
to Knowledge edited by Jesús Lau, Ana Maria Tammaro, and Theo D.
Bothma (Munich: De Gruyter Saur, 2012), pp. 343-372, Available:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110263121, (September 9, 2012).
13. Nancy Diana Gómez, Atilio Bustos González, Julio Santillán Aldana
Olga Arias, “Open access indicators and information society”. OCLC
Digital Libraries. 25, no. 2 (2009), pp. 82–92.
14. Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) http://roar.eprints.org/
15. OpenDoar, The Directory of Open Access Repositories: http://
www.opendoar.org
16. Ranking Web of Repositories: http://repositories.webometrics.info
17. Paola Bongiovani, Silvia Nakano, “Acceso abierto en Argentina: la
experiencia de articulación y coordinación institucional de los
repositorios digitales en ciencia y tecnología,” E-colabora, 1, no. 2
(2011), pp. 163–179. http://publicaciones.renata.edu.co/index.
php/RCEC/article/view/56, (September 9, 2012).
18. Argentina. Honorable Cámara de Diputados de la Nación, Proyecto
de Ley 1927-D-2011 Creación de Repositorios Digitales Institucionales de Acceso Abierto, Propios o Compartidos, Online. (2011).
Available: http://www1.hcdn.gov.ar/proyxml/expediente.asp?
fundamentos=si&numexp=1927-D-2011, (September 9, 2012).
19. Sandra Miguel, Nancy Diana Gómez, Paola Bongiovani, “Acceso
abierto real y potencial a la producción científica de un país. El caso
argentino”, El Profesional de la Información, 21, no. 2 (March-April
2012), pp. 146–153.
20. Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAPs) http://project-soap.eu/
21. Paola Bongiovani, Nancy Diana Gómez, Sandra Miguel, “Opiniones
y hábitos de publicación en acceso abierto de los investigadores
argentinos. Un estudio basado en los datos de la encuesta SOAP”,
Revista española de Documentación Científica, 35, no. 3 (2012),
pp. 453–467. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.3.903, (September
9, 2012).
22. Siân Harris, Moving towards an open access future: the role of academic
libraries, SAGE, British Library (August 2012), Available: http://
www.stm-publishing.com/what-role-will-academic-libraries-playin-moving-towards-an-open-access-future/, (September 9, 2012).