Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 477 (2017) 10–26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/palaeo Changing competition dynamics among predators at the late Early Pleistocene site Barranc de la Boella (Tarragona, Spain) Antonio Pineda a,b,⁎, Palmira Saladié a,b,c,f, Rosa Huguet a,b,f, Isabel Cáceres b,a, Antonio Rosas d,f, Almudena Estalrrich d,e, Antonio García-Tabernero d, Josep Vallverdú a,b,f a Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES), Zona Educacional 4, Campus Sescelades URV (Edifici W3), 43007 Tarragona, Spain Àrea de Prehistòria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Avinguda de Catalunya 35, 43002 Tarragona, Spain c GQP-CG, Grupo Quaternário e Pré-História do Centro de Geociências (uI&D 73 – FCT), Portugal d Paleoanthropology group, Department of Paleobiology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain e Sections Paleoanthropology and Tertiary Mammals, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany f Unit Associated to CSIC, Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain b a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 15 November 2016 Received in revised form 16 March 2017 Accepted 19 March 2017 Available online 06 April 2017 Keywords: Palaeoecology Taphonomy La Mina El Forn Lower Palaeolithic a b s t r a c t The late Early Pleistocene site Barranc de la Boella provides an unparalleled opportunity to assess the context of the activities of the hominin populations that inhabited the Iberian Peninsula at 1 Ma. Recently, strong evidence for access to mammoth meat has been described at the Pit 1 locality. At the la Mina and el Forn excavation areas, little evidence exists for the anthropogenic processing of macromammals. However, the presence of humans is recorded, and the available evidence suggests these populations had access to several interesting resources. By analysing and comparing five separate assemblages at Barranc de la Boella, we assess the fluctuating presence of hominins and carnivores and the levels of competition among predators in each assemblage. Our analysis reveals different levels of competition intensity during the formation of assemblages when hominin groups were present, as evidenced by the abundance and diversity of stone artefacts. The analyses of skeletal component ratios indicate several competitive contexts, and the greatest presence of hominin groups is associated with the most competitive scenarios. The palaeoenvironment at Barranc de la Boella was rich in resources that hominins could exploit. The presence of hominin and carnivore groups appears to have been higher in levels with more inferred competition. This scenario supports prior research that concludes that carnivore abundance and highly competitive contexts were two constants in the lives of these hominin groups. Thus, the criteria determining whether hominins could inhabit a given landscape were most likely related to the presence or absence of resources, such as animal resources, water and raw materials, rather than the dynamics of the carnivore populations, to which the hominins were able to become habituated. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Zooarchaeological studies of Early Pleistocene sites have been conducted to evaluate four primary topics related to early hominin populations: their diet, their mode for obtaining animal resources, their social component in acquiring and maintaining resources, and their adaptation to the environment and relationships with other agents (e.g., Isaac, 1971; Leakey, 1971; Binford, 1981; Brain, 1981; Blumenschine, 1986; ⁎ Corresponding author at: Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social (IPHES), Zona Educacional 4, Campus Sescelades URV (Edifici W3), 43007 Tarragona, Spain. E-mail addresses: apineda.alcala@gmail.com (A. Pineda), psaladie@iphes.cat (P. Saladié), rhuguet@iphes.cat (R. Huguet), icaceres@iphes.cat (I. Cáceres), arosas@mncn.csic.es (A. Rosas), Almudena.Estalrrich@senckenberg.de (A. Estalrrich), agarciatabernero@mncn.csic.es (A. García-Tabernero), jvallverdu@iphes.cat (J. Vallverdú). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.03.030 0031-0182/© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Bunn and Kroll, 1986; Stanford and Bunn, 2001; Egeland et al., 2004; Faith and Behrensmeyer, 2006; Domínguez-Rodrigo et al., 2007a; Faith et al., 2007; Egeland, 2008; Rodríguez-Gómez et al., 2016a; Saladié et al., 2014). Meat was an important resource in the diet of early hominin groups, and this dietary preference affected factors such as brain expansion and social organization (e.g., Aiello and Wheeler, 1995; Stanford and Bunn, 2001; Ungar, 2006; Bunn et al., 2016). Consequently, these populations had to compete with other predators for access to these resources. Competition is the interaction between two or more individuals that results in reducing the fitness of at least one of the individuals. This may occur between members of the same (intraspecific) or different (interspecific) species and may be confrontational when it occurs directly or exploitative when the competitors are competing for the same resource (Wiens, 1989). For large carnivores, interactions between species