Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et.al; International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology ISSN: 2454-132X Impact factor: 4.295 (Volume 4, Issue 2) Available online at: www.ijariit.com Structural audit of RCC building Sanket Sanjay Suryawanshi sanketsuryawanshi09@gmail.com Dilkap Research Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Neral, Maharashtra Vaibhav Vishnu Vishe vvvaibhav@outlook.com Dilkap Research Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Neral, Maharashtra Deepak Premchand Sah dsah44623@gmail.com Dilkap Research Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Neral, Maharashtra Reetika Sharan reetika.sharan@gmail.com Dilkap Research Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Neral, Maharashtra ABSTRACT Civil engineering is the foundations of all structure which made human life easy. Structure can be of any kind like residential building or non-commercial buildings or historical or ancient monuments had huge impact on human life because of their long life span which made them efficient structure, but this effectiveness of now-a-days structures can’t be seen anywhere. Structure are getting older or weak before their design period. In this project where trying to root out faulty mechanism in structure to overcome the failure of structure. Keywords: Foundation, Ancient monument, Efficient, Effectiveness, Faulty mechanism, Design period, Failure. 1. INTRODUCTION As the structure gets older and older as time goes it need periodical maintains and checkup to prevent future damages. Health and performance of building depends on its quality of maintains also to prevent the structure from environmental effect one should monitor it time to time by taking professional opinion. Therefore, structure audit is done to assess the general health of building. Structure audit is preliminary technical survey done on a structure to suggest remedies for repairs. External and internal damage of structure mainly depends on the faulty construction technique. Also various action like fire damage, temperature effect, wing effect, frost action or chemical attack slowly deteriorate the structure. Hence audit is essential to make the serviceability and scope for future development aspects better. 1.1 Need of structural audit of building It is mandatory for all co-operative housing societies, whose buildings are more than 15 years old to have mandatory structural audit carried out every 5th year to determine the existing life of building’s structure and its balanced life. According to model bylaw no-77, structural audit is necessary and binding requirement. Its stipulates that if the age of building is 15 to 30 years structural audit must be carried out once in 5 years and for 3 years for building older than 30 years. U can go even earlier for it if structural conditions gets bad. 1.2 Object of project Structural audit of the building is done in following objectives.  To assess the damage to the existing structures under distress and suggest the remedial measures for strengthing or repairs and rehabilitation. © 2018, www.IJARIIT.com All Rights Reserved Page | 1370 Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et.al; International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology  To establish reserve strength in elements of structures required upgradation in order to support higher capacity equipment. This was done to minimize modification and downtime. 2. METHODOLOGY Structural audit is carry out by 2 method:  Visual Inspection NDT testing (Field and lab testing) A. Visual inspection In this method inspection is done manually like if there are crack present on external and internal wall. Cracks in beam and column, spalling of concrete, deterioration of structure building leakage if and get the deep knowledge about settlement in foundation, strata, settlement in soil or etc. B. NDT TESTING NDT stands for nondestructive testing mainly done is auditing process to assess the structure technically and with help of obtained data. Structural components can be classified into 4 category; very good, good, bad and very poor. 3. STRUCTURAL AUDIT REPORT A) Case Study of R.C.C. Building Basic Information Name of building:- Vidhata apartment Type of Structure - RCC Building of G+4 floors Address - thane Age - 28 Weather effect - Yes B) Visual Inspection:Building was inspected by us as per flat and externally. Columns, beams, slabs, walls, and also some areas defects occurred, where observed, and conditions of the structural components were recorded on sheet. At the same time we have taken photographs elaborate the defects visually. Sr. No. 1    2      3 DISCRITION FOUNDATION STRATA REMARKS Hard strata observed on 1.70 m. and soft strata seen on 1.50 m. depth Visual Inspection Settlements of columns Cracks in column, walls, joint at plinth SUPERSTRUCTURE INSPECTION Cracks in columns/rusting of steel/exposed steel Cracks in beam/rusting of steel/exposed steel Cracks in slabs/rusting of steel/exposed steel Cracks in external walls Cracks in internal walls Leakages and dampness in external walls Minor hair cracks are visible on external walls specially on corner of walls Not properly identified on site Minor vertical cracks are developed on column and minor cracks are seen on joint of slab, beam, column Rusted ,broken Reinforcement is visible below underneath portion of slab Minor vertical crack are seen on wall surface whereas long wall and short wall are joint together Rusted, broken Reinforcement is visible below underneath portion of slab © 2018, www.IJARIIT.com All Rights Reserved Minor vertical and inclined cracks are developed Minor vertical and inclined cracks are developed Not seen Page | 1371 Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et.al; International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 4 Terrace seepage is notices on underneath portion of slab waterproofing and inspection 5 Inspection of water Overhead water tank slab is leaking due to minor cracks are seen. tank above the terrace 6 Leakages and Overhead water tanks slab reinforced is badly come from RCC padade. damages ;plumbing lines/waterline; drainage line 7 Building last repair Before 5 years details Date 10 April 13  Cost of repair 7 lakhs  work What was repair All walls and plumbing system and drainage system  8 Date of construction In 1990 of building 9 RCC/load bearing R.C.C type structure 10 Idea about foundation After enquiry it is understand by people living nearby area that hard strata strata from is observed varying from 1.60 to 1.80 m surrounding areas and enquiry 11 HFL during this 1.20 m monsoon 12 HFL during last 5 1.30m years 13 Building plan is Yes approved 14 Test recommended A Rebound hammer test 10 readings required B UPV TEST 9 Reading C Carbonation test 5 Readings C) NDT observation Under NDT we have perform rebound hammer test, UPV test, and carbonation test to check performance of the structural components like beams, slabs, columns, internal and external walls. Rebound Hammer Test COMPONENTS Beam Column Slab 1 2 3 REBOUND NO 29 27 29 STRENGTH ,(KG/SQ.CM) 265 205 265 4 5 6 26 30 28 200 270 260 1 2 3 32 33 32 290 300 290 4 5 6 35 31 36 320 280 325 1 2 3 4 5 6 26 25 25 27 28 25 200 175 175 205 260 175 © 2018, www.IJARIIT.com All Rights Reserved AVG. STRENGTH(KG/SQ.CM) REMARK 244.17 Good layer 300.83 Good layer 198.33 Fair Page | 1372 Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et.al; International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology UPV TEST COMPONENT Beam Column Slab PULSE VELOCITY (KM/SEC) 1 3.1 2 3 3.5 3.3 1 2 3.7 3.5 3 3.9 1 2 3.1 3.0 3 3.3 AVG PULSE VELOCITY (KM/SEC) REMARK Satisfactory But loss of integrity Is suspected 3.3 3.7 Good to very good, slight porosity may exist 3.1 Satisfactory but loss of integrity is suspected Carbonation Test MEMBER DEPTH(MM.) C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 35 25 10 30 30 CARBONATION PRESENT NO NO NO NO NO 4. RESULT By the above investigation survey we have come to result that the structure health condition is fair. With study of NDT test we have concluded that structural member or components are suffering from class 3 damage. According to CPWD (Central public works department) class 3 damage stands for observation like spalling of concrete cover, structural cracks etc., in which principal repairs required. Principal repair works should be started early as possible and to avoid further deterioration of structure. The repair work should include strengthening of column, plastering works of defected areas and water proofing, etc. Also rectification of leakage should be in various location at top floors. Quality of RCC found was poor as per the result of rebound test and UPV test performed at various location. Delay in repair works will result in the increase of the quantity of works due to continuous deterioration project. 5. LIMITATION OF PRESENT STUDY On the basis of present study of structural audit i.e. visual inspection and NDT test, only visual conditions of the building and structural members and also technical parameters can be study. But for detection of technical damage or defect at specific an d particular component of building. Proximal remote sensing tools should be used. 6. CONCLUSIONS          Building is suffering from class 3 damage. Principle repairs are required at various levels. The repair work should start earliest to avoid further deterioration of the structure. All the vegetation should be removed at earliest. Any delay in structural repair work will result in more deterioration and quantity of work will become more. Slabs containing fine dormant cracks must be repaired by applying and overlay such as polymer modified Portland cement mortar or concrete or by silica fume concrete. Corroded steel must be replaced where ever necessary, if steel cannot be removed then it should be clean for remove rusting and additional reinforcement is to be provided. Minor cracks should be repaired by injection of epoxy or by using grouting method. Deteriorated plaster surface must be removed and plastering should be done with mortar proportions 1:3 © 2018, www.IJARIIT.com All Rights Reserved Page | 1373 Suryawanshi Sanket Sanjay et.al; International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology 7. REFERENCES [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] A.B. Mahadik, M.H. Jaiswal,”Structural Audit Of Building”, International Journal of Civil Engineering Research .ISSN 22783652 Volume 5, No4 (2014), pp.411-416 B.H Chafekar, O.S. Kadam, K.B. Kale, S. R. Mohite, P.A. Shinde, V.P. Koyle,”Structural Audit”,Internaitional Journal od Civil And Structural Engineering Research (IJCSER) Vol.1, Issue 1,pp(42-46), Month: October 2013-March 2014. Jedidi Malek, Machta Kaouther, “Destructive and Non- destructive Testing of Concrete Structure” , Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, volume 5, Number 4 (2014), pp.411-416. Patil S.R, Prof Sayyed G.A., “Structural Audit”, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) pp 60-64. Pranjali V. Kulkarni, Sachin V. Admane, “Simplifying and Managing the Process of Structural Audit”, Engineering and scientific International Journal (ESLJ), Volume 2, Issue 1, January, March 2015. © 2018, www.IJARIIT.com All Rights Reserved Page | 1374