An Unfinished Compendium of Materials
Edited by Rachel Harkness
ISBN: 978-1-85752-060-6
Published by the University of Aberdeen
knowingfromtheinside.org
This book has been produced as part of the project:
Knowing from the Inside: Anthropology, Art,
Architecture and Design funded by the European
Research Council (ERC) and hosted at the
University of Aberdeen.
First Published: Aberdeen, 2017
Design: Neil McGuire / After the News
Air
Asphalt
Beeswax
Body
Bristol Board
Canvas
Castors
Chi / 气
Clay
Concrete
Corrugated Cardboard
Crackle Glaze
Drawings
Dust
Earth
Formaldehyde
Fur
Glass
Ice
Iron Ore
Japan Blues
Light
Limestone
Linseed Oil
Metals
Mooseskin
Mortar
Nylon
Paint
Paper Plans
Peat
Pigment
Pitch
Plant Matter
Plasterboard
Plastic
Polystyrene
Red Ochre / Tsaih
Reeds
Salabardo
Salt
Sand
Shipping Containers
Sound
Sourdough
Stone
Tarpaulin
Thread
Titanium
Tracing Paper
Transmaterial
Turf
Water
Watercolour
WillowFlex
Wood
Wood
Wood
5
10
14
18
24
28
29
32
37
40
45
51
53
59
64
71
72
74
76
84
85
89
92
96
100
104
106
109
110
112
116
122
125
127
131
132
138
144
145
154
160
161
164
170
174
178
182
184
188
191
195
196
202
204
206
208
212
218
Afterword 226
Contributors 227
Limestone
Acid test on limestone, C. Simonetti, 2017
transparent and odourless. It remains unnoticed in a sensory climate where seeing is
believing and strong smells are associated
with precariousness.
LIMESTONE
Cristián Simonetti
This small piece of limestone comes from
Ñilhue, a mine owned by Melón, the
first company in Chile to mine the material industrially, for the production of
cement. Melón’s operations started nearly a
century ago in Calera, a town not far from
Valparaíso. Calera is famous for its name,
which comes from lime (‘cal’ in Spanish),
a chemical made by burning limestone
at about 1,000°C. As in the production of
lime, the stone releases carbon dioxide (CO2)
bubbles in reaction to drops of hydrochloric
acid, added by the man in charge of mining
operations at Ñilhue. This acid test, as it is
known among geologists, corroborates the
presence of calcium carbonate (CaCO3), a
mix of calcium oxide (CaO) – otherwise
known as lime – and CO2 that is the main
component in limestone. Soon the stone
will be burned at even higher temperatures
(about 1,500°C), along with small quantities of sand and clay, to produce cement.
The melting will take place inside Melón’s
kilns at Calera. Powered by coal and natural gas, flames in this type of kiln reach
about 1,900°C, one-third of the sun’s surface
temperature. At such temperatures, all
of the CO2 contained in the stone will be
released into the atmosphere, contributing to global warming. Globally, cement
production is responsible for between 5
and 10 percent of all carbon emissions. Like
the bubbles in the above picture, the CO2
coming out of Melon’s furnaces is both
Through the transformations of this small
limestone I wish to briefly narrate some of
earth’s history, following the lead of generations of geologists who have perfected the
skill of seeing the long in the now by paying
attention to stones. This practice is often
dated back to the publication of Theory of the
Earth by James Hutton (1795), who is credited for making the abyss of time, solidified
in the masses of the Scottish landscape, flow
once again. Hutton was among the first to
point out how things were constantly in the
making. ‘No vestige of a beginning, no prospect of an end’ was his famous claim. Jan
Zalasiewicz offers a recent contemporary
example of this skill. As one of the leaders
behind the controversial effort to formalize the definition of our current geological
epoch – termed the Anthropocene, to signal
humans as a leading geological force at
the planetary scale – Zalasiewicz (2010)
narrates the earth’s history starting from a
pebble. Unlike Zalasiewicz, my narrative is
not through an ordinary pebble found on a
beach, but from an industrially mined stone
made of calcium oxide and CO2. Imagine
how many planets could be envisioned
depending on which stone you pick.
Limestone makes up around 10 percent of
all sedimentary rocks and is mined almost
everywhere in the world. It has varied
92
industrial applications, including most
notably the production of steel and cement,
perhaps the most indispensable materials in
the building of modernity. According to the
National Lime Association, comprised of U.S.
and Canadian commercial lime companies,
we’re talking about ‘the versatile mineral,
the building block of construction and
human progress that is a fundamental part
of your everyday life, whether you realize
it or not’.1 Before cement was rediscovered
in the eighteenth century, limestone and
lime had been used, respectively, as building stone and mortar in construction for
over 8,000 years. A versatile material, lime
is used in products with countless applications, appearing in many of the things that
we now use daily, including industrial materials such as plastic, paper, ink, paint, glass,
and rubber, as well as some foods.
According to DeLanda’s (1997) A Thousand
Years of Non-Linear History, this mineralization has been turned outside in and inside
out a number of times during evolution.
By burning the exoskeletons of sea critters
at high temperatures to produce lime and
cement, humans have created their own
exoskeletons, to further protect the soft
tissue which their endoskeletons support.
In doing so, humans have accelerated deep
time, fuelled by Promethean illusions. In
their furnaces, they have released in an
instant carbon accumulated over millennia, turning sedimentary formations into
igneous flows. However, these are not the
volcanic flows which DeLanda contrasts
against sedimentary formations, in dialogue
with Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987) famous
distinction between rhizomatic and arboreal
models of evolution. Unlike the hierarchical view of evolution presented in Darwin’s
tree of life, which is modelled on a vertically stratified fossil record contained inside
sedimentary rocks, rhizomatic forms and
volcanic flows would flatten relations, challenging human exceptionalism.
However, our relationship to this piece of
limestone extends even further back in time.
Caught in an endless exchange of matter
and energy, our stories entangle to the very
start of life as we know it. Limestone is
made of the same stuff that composes our
bones. Just like our ancestors, this small
limestone came out of the ocean, moved by
tectonic forces. It is made of the fossilized
skeletons of sea organisms. A process that
is still underway, the geological formation
of limestone dates back 542 million years
to a sudden increase in the concentration
of calcium in the earth’s oceans, possibly
triggered by a combination of erosion and
volcanic activity. This calcium concentration resulted in a process of mineralization
(skeletonization) in organisms from the
so-called Cambrian explosion, where essentially all mayor animal phyla appeared in
the fossil record and which subsequently
led to the appearance of our vertebrate
ancestors, who slowly crawled out of the
oceans. In the words of Rachel Carlson, ‘our
lime-hardened skeletons are a heritage from
the calcium-rich ocean of Cambrian time’
(1950: 13-14). Like sea organisms, we humans
are also somewhat lime-creatures.
1
In a totally contrasting mode, modern
construction has turned limestone, a sedimentary rock, into an igneous cement, only
to turn it back into the ultimate sedimentary
layer on top of which the history of modernity is to be written. Concrete’s impermeable
surfaces – made of cement, sand and aggregate – have lifted humans above the land
while suffocating nature. However, these are
only provisory illusions in that no concrete
surface is impervious to decay, each one
depending on extended practices of care.
Given enough time, all solid matter is meant
to flow (Harkness et al. 2015).
Curiously, the Anthropocene – a word that
most scholars in the humanities seem to
simultaneously love and hate – resembles
how Westerners have played God in their
attempts to subdue nature below concrete
surfaces. For geoscientists in charge of
its formalization, the term stands for yet
another layer in earth’s history, placed atop
all others in geological charts. This punctuated understanding of chronology is
http://lime.org/lime-basics/why-is-limestill-important/ (13 February 2017).
93
Limestone
revealed in how most efforts to formalize
the Anthropocene have focused on identifying its date of birth (Simonetti 2017). Such
an understanding of chronology risks sending into oblivion the much deeper history of
the mingling of humans and the inhuman.
No doubt we need a fair starting date for
the Anthropocene, if we are at all to achieve
some sense of environmental responsibility.
However, this date should not be baptismal in nature, which would resemble how
modernity wishes to place itself above tradition, once and for all.
Limestone
References
Carlson, R. 1950. The Sea Around Us. Oxford:
Oxford UP.
DeLanda, M. 1997. A Thousand Years of
Non-Linear History. Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand
Plateaus, trans. B. Massumi. London:
Continuum.
Harkness, R., Simonetti, C. and Winter, J.
2015. ‘Liquid Rock: Gathering, Flattening,
Curing’. Parallax 76, 309–326.
Besides, how much more do we risk in
reducing the present to the entanglements
produced by one particular species? How
many other entanglements beyond the
human will be erased if we dare to place
ourselves at the centre of the present? What
would it be like to write from the viewpoint
of shells, instead of humans? Would they
consider us relatives, after we have destroyed
all remaining coral reefs that still contain/
trap CO2? Ultimately, compressing deep
time into a pebble and accelerating deep
time in a kiln result from similar infatuations with human ingenuity. Both modern
industries and science have been justified
based on triumphalist narratives of progress.
Hutton, J. 1795. Theory of the Earth
with Proofs and Illustrations, vol. I & II.
Edinburgh: William Creech.
Simonetti, C. 2017. Sentient
Conceptualisations. Time in Archaeology.
London: Routledge.
Zalasiewicz, J. 2010. The Planet in a Pebble:
A Journey into Earth’s Deep History. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Patterned tree roots, W.F. Xue, 2011
Give way to the impermanence of surfaces
on which modern values stand; challenge
the fascination with narrating origin myths
and stabilizing periodizations; leave the
retrospective emphasis on a single deep past,
opening up forward-looking speculations on
how deep futures multiply. Hopefully, cracks
will open, allowing for entanglements
beyond the human to mushroom.2
2
The research behind this chapter has been
supported by the projects ‘Solid Fluids in
the Anthropocene’ (funded by the British
Academy for the Humanities and the Social
Sciences), and ‘Concrete Futures’ (funded
by Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y
Tecnológico, Chile, Nº 11150278).
94
95
Contributors
project. His current interests lie on the interface between anthropology, archaeology, art
and architecture. Recent books include The
Perception of the Environment (2000), Lines
(2007), Being Alive (2011), Making (2013) and
The Life of Lines (2015).
Paolo Gruppuso is Honorary Research
Fellow at the Department of Anthropology
of the University of Aberdeen. He is interested in environmental conservation,
landscape, agriculture and wetland management. He has conducted ethnographic
research in two protected wetlands in Agro
Pontino (Italy), on topics including environmental conflicts, water management, and
environmental education.
Leonidas Koutsoumpos is assistant professor of Theory in Architectural Design at
the School of Architecture of the National
Technical University of Athens, Greece.
His research has been exploring the designing processes through philosophical and
ethnomethodological inquiries. He is also
practicing architecture through by and
constructing projects in various scales.
Rachel Harkness is a Lecturer in Design
and Screen Cultures at Edinburgh College
of Art, University of Edinburgh. Her
research and teaching explores architecture and design as a peopled process, pays
particular attention to the social life of
the materials involved, and considers how
people make manifest their ecological
designs for living.
Valeria Lembo is Honorary Research
Fellow at the Department of Anthropology
of the University of Aberdeen, where she
is carrying out research in collaboration
with the project Knowing From the Inside.
Her current work is exploring the interplay
between breathing, linearity and skilled
practice by experimentally engaging with
embroidery, singing and movement awareness techniques.
Marc Higgin is a research fellow in
the Department of Anthropology at the
University of Aberdeen. His current
research is with visual artists and their practices of making, following the different
contexts, each with their own regime of
value, through which materials and things
are transformed into works of art.
Jan Peter Laurens Loovers (Ph.D.,
Aberdeen, 2012) is an ERC Arctic Domus
post-doctoral fellow at the University of
Aberdeen. Since 2005 he has been working with Gwich’in in northern Canada on
pedagogy, ecology, and dogs, amongst other
themes. Jan Peter Laurens Loovers wants
to acknowledge the Gwich’in Social and
Cultural Institute, Annie Jane Modeste, and
Rachel Joy Harkness for their assistance
and the community of Fort McPherson for
their kindness and teachings. The contributions (Furs, Iron Ore, Mooseskin, and Red
Ochre) have been made possible by financial
support from the Royal Anthropological
Institute’s Urgent Anthropology Fund and
the Arctic Domus ERC Advanced Grant.
Elizabeth A Hodson is a research affiliate
on the project ‘Knowing from the Inside’
based in the Anthropology Department
at the University of Aberdeen. Her work
focuses on contemporary art and in particular drawing, with a regional interest in
Iceland and Scotland. She holds a studio at
Edinburgh Sculpture Workshop.
Sophie Hueglin is an archaeologist from
Germany, who does research on medieval
mortar production technologies in England,
Switzerland and Italy. More generally, she
is interested in the theoretical concept of
petrification, a process that for example can
be observed in the change from wood to
stone in early medieval architecture.
Ray Lucas is Head of Architecture at the
University of Manchester, and has a PhD in
Social Anthropology from the University of
Aberdeen; his teaching ranges from studio
workshops on Knowledge Production in
Architecture to lecture courses on Graphic
Tim Ingold is Professor of Social
Anthropology at the University of
Aberdeen, and Principal Investigator for
the ERC-funded Knowing From the Inside
228
Contributors
Anthropology. Lucas is author of Research
Methods for Architecture (2016), Drawing
Parallels (2018), and Anthropology for
Architects (2018). Lucas’ current research
includes ‘graphic anthropologies’ on
marketplaces in South Korea and urban
festivals in Japan, describing the informal,
social, and iterative architecture through the
conventions of architectural drawing.
on migratory and marginal worlds as well as
visual and textual storytelling.
Claire Pençak is a choreographer and
dancer whose practice extends beyond the
studio and theatre to working in an interdisciplinary context. Her work may materialise
as performance, installation, writings from
improvisation and place making projects.
www.clairepencak.wordpress.com
Enrico Marcoré is a PhD candidate for
the University of Aberdeen in the ERC
project “Knowing from the Inside”. His
research focuses on the rebuilding of the
L’Aquila province after the 2009 earthquake. Through considering many forms of
dwelling arisen from the quake, he wants to
explore the role of building in the making
of Aquilean post-catastrophic environment.
Tanja Romankiewicz first trained as an
architect, interested in the people of the past.
She is now an archaeologist, interested in
how past people created their built environment. Her current project, a Leverhulme
Trust Early Career Fellowship at University
of Edinburgh, investigates how we can be
‘Building (Ancient) Lives’.
Griet Scheldeman, an anthropologist from
Belgium, and Doug Benn, a glaciologist
from Scotland, met in 2012 on a glacier in
Spitsbergen. Since then they have explored
their mutual passion for ice, bringing
together scientific and artistic perspectives
in a holistic appreciation of ‘solid water’ in
all its forms. They now live by the sea in
Scotland.
Francesca Marin is PhD candidate in
anthropology at the University of Aberdeen.
Her work focuses on interdisciplinary
research, collaborative processes, conservation
and small-scale fisheries. In Argentina, she
works with marine biologists. Beforehand
she did fieldwork in Kenya and Cameroon,
in collaboration with volcanologists, cartographers and NGO members, studying risk
perception, vulnerability and development.
Cristián Simonetti is Assistant Professor
at the Programa de Antropología, Instituto
de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad
Católica de Chile and an Honorary
Research Fellow at the Department of
Anthropology, University of Aberdeen. His
work concentrates on how bodily gestures
and environmental forces relate to notions
of time in science, the topic of a monograph entitled Sentient Conceptualizations
(Routledge, 2017).
Germain Meulemans is a PhD candidate
in Anthropology at the Universities of Liège
and Aberdeen. He is interested in hybrid,
anthropogenic environments, and in the
challenge they pose to both the natural and
the social sciences. Recently, he has been
conducting ethnographic research on the
topic of urban soils.
Christine Moderbacher is an
Anthropologist and Documentary
Filmmaker. (Harraga 2008, Men at work
2010, A Letter to Mohamed 2013, A
Summer in Nigeria (in progress)). She is
currently finishing her PhD “CRAFTING
LIVES in Brussels - Making and Mobility
on the Margins” at the department
of Anthropology at the University of
Aberdeen, as part of the project KFI Knowing From the Inside. In her films as
well as her anthropological work she focuses
Erika Akariguame Armengol Sloth has
studied social anthropology at Goldsmiths
University of London, environmental
anthropology at University of Aberdeen and
is currently studying development studies
at London School of Economics, (where she
is working on a research project regarding
material cultures in developing countries).
229