25/3/2019  How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization  ‫ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ‬Fr Es   Beta version Home About Us  Videos Articles Glossary Resources  Reports Reading Radicalization Contact Events English  Home  Articles How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand 0 March 25, 2019 in Articles Police of cers guard the area close to Masjid al-Nur, 15 March 2019. (Photo by Tessa BURROWS / AFP)TESSA BURROWS/AFP/Getty Images 0 SHARES 18 VIEWS  Share on Facebook https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/  Share on Twitter   1/6 25/3/2019 How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization By Manuel R. Torres Soriano Terrorists learn vicariously. Their operatives feed on the experience of other radicals, nding examples of successful practices and warnings about mistakes they should avoid. That the inspiration comes from other groups that they classify as enemies does not generate too many contradictions. For example, after the attacks of September 11, 2001, a constellation of radicals, from left to right, showed admiration for the audacity with which Osama Bin Laden had humiliated the American power. One of the aspects that generates the most fascination among the violent is, precisely, the ability of some actors to break the media siege to which they consider themselves subject. Terrorists are convinced of the innate truth of their ideas, as well as of their transforming capacity. According to them, the only obstacle that prevents the population from adopting their approaches in a generalized manner is the effort made by their enemies to keep the people in a state of ignorance and manipulation. Violence, conveniently dramatized, is the key that gives access to public opinion. And in this area, there is much to learn from other groups that have managed to make everyone aware of their ideas and objectives. Terrorist violence inspired by extreme right-wing ideologies has historically shown a weak organizational structure, something that has prevented its militants from adopting some of the successful examples set by the jihadists, the extreme left, and ethno-separatist terrorists. While these latter groups have enjoyed complex organisations that allowed different people to be assigned the functions of planning, executing an attack, and propagandistic exploitation, the fragmented nature of extreme right-wing extremism has meant individual attackers often have to assume all these roles alone. This has placed a considerable limitations on them. This was the case, for example, of the Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik, who meticulously designed a chain of attacks in July 2011. After setting off a car bomb against government facilities in Oslo, he took advantage of the confusion to disembark with an arsenal of weapons on the small island of Utøya. There, he would end the lives of 69 teenagers attending a summer camp organized by a left-wing political party. The purpose of these attacks was to draw attention to a very long manifesto that he had written under the title “2083: A European Declaration of Independence,” in which he pointed to Islam and “cultural Marxism” as the main enemies of Western civilization. However, Breivik was very careful not to make the text known on the Internet until a few hours before his attacks began. Without an organisation to back him up, he himself had to assume responsibility for the propagandistic exploitation of his actions, which meant that he could not do it too far in advance of the attack (something that could alert the authorities), nor could he do it after the attack (when he would foreseeably be dead or without the possibility of accessing the Internet). https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/ 2/6 25/3/2019 How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization It is likely that the perpetrators of the shocking attacks on the worshippers at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand, were not exclusively inspired by the actions of this Norwegian terrorist. There are other precedents, beyond the extreme-right, from which they were able to nd tactical lessons on how to manage their crimes. The rst terrorist to use a GoPro camera to document his murders was a French jihadist, Mohammed Merah, who took video from his motorcycle while shooting Jewish soldiers and children in the town of Toulouse in 2012. At that time, though, there was no capacity to broadcast live video over the Internet, so Merah made the questionable decision to release his recording by sending it on a USB stick to Al-Jazeera television network. The Arab broadcaster showed good judgement and decided not to broadcast even stills of this atrocity video. As a result, the crimes of this terrorist of Algerian origin received signi cantly less media coverage than he would have obtained with the public dissemination of the images. The rst terrorist who used Facebook Live to broadcast a real-time attack was also a jihadist. Larossi Abballa murdered a couple of French policemen in 2016 as they arrived at their home in Magnanville. After stabbing the couple, in front of their horri ed 3-year-old son, he began to broadcast on his mobile phone a long plea, in which he encouraged other supporters of the Islamic State to follow his example. However, this is also a blurred example of success, since, although the streaming broadcast guaranteed that his message would not be silenced, the video started after the murders, and although it was lmed inside the victims’ home, it only shows the face of the terrorist. This made it different from other “conventional” jihadist testimonies, and therefore, it had less media “appeal”. The way in which the Christchurch massacre was carried out is a fusion of the lessons drawn from all these precedents, trying to combine the aspects that facilitate greater media coverage. To obtaining images in rst person and their instantaneous diffusion, the terrorist added a novelty: the transformation of the weapons used in the attack into propaganda instruments in themselves. Both the ri es and the loaders were painted with multiple codes and symbols typical of the subculture of white supremacism and the neo-Nazi movement. The weapons left behind by the terrorist would necessarily become evidence of a judicial and police investigation, and it would be inevitable that the media would echo the complex supremacist symbology and its meaning. In conclusion, fanatics have never stopped experimenting with the new possibilities offered by technology. Unfortunately, we will continue to witness the terrible fruits of this process of imitation and innovation going forward. Related Posts https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/ 3/6 25/3/2019 How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization ARTICLES ARTICLES Spectacularizing the Far-Right: Before and after Christchurch Populism Overtook Policy on Returning Foreign Fighters — and That’s Somewhat Understandable  MARCH 22, 2019  MARCH 21, 2019 ARTICLES ARTICLES British Returning Foreign Terrorist Fighters Can Hamza bin Laden Lead AlQaeda?  MARCH 19, 2019  MARCH 18, 2019 ARTICLES ARTICLES Far-Right Terrorist Attacks New Zealand Mosques Far Right extremism on Telegram: A brief overview  MARCH 15, 2019  MARCH 14, 2019 https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/ 4/6 25/3/2019 How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization Latest from Twitter Tweets by @eernow European Eye on Radicalization @eernow Terrorists learn from one-another, writes @mrtorsor, and in Christchurch the far-Right showed it had taken lessons in media tactics from the jihadists and others. eeradicalization.com/howterrorists… How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand By Manuel R. Torres Soriano Terrorists learn vicariously. Their operatives feed on the experience of othe… Popular Far Right extremism on Telegram: A brief overview  MARCH 14, 2019 Don’t Think Like A Terrorist  MARCH 11, 2019 Interview with Abu Salman Belarus, leader of Malhama Tactical: A follow up  FEBRUARY 21, 2019 https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/ 5/6 25/3/2019 How Terrorists Publicise Attacks: The Lessons Of New Zealand – European Eye on Radicalization The Risk of Returning Foreign ghters In ltrating from the Western Balkans to the EU  MARCH 12, 2019 Populism Overtook Policy on Returning Foreign Fighters — and That’s Somewhat Understandable  MARCH 21, 2019 Spanish returnees from Daesh. National response  MARCH 6, 2019 © 2018 EER - Copyright © European Eye on Radicalization. https://eeradicalization.com/how-terrorists-publicise-attacks-the-lessons-of-new-zealand/ 6/6