bs_bs_banner
Hepatology Research 2019
doi: 10.1111/hepr.13321
Original Article
Clinical and pathological features of sarcopenia-related
indices in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Yuya Seko, Naoki Mizuno, Shinya Okishio, Aya Takahashi, Seita Kataoka, Keiichiroh Okuda,
Mitsuhiro Furuta, Masashi Takemura, Hiroyoshi Taketani, Atsushi Umemura,
Taichiro Nishikawa, Kanji Yamaguchi, Michihisa Moriguchi and Yoshito Itoh
Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto
Background: Sarcopenia is diagnosed with the skeletal muscle index (SMI) or the sarcopenia index (SI). We previously reported that the ratio of skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass
(SF ratio) was a novel index of sarcopenia in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate sarcopenia with these indices in
patients with NAFLD.
Methods: One hundred and fifty-six consecutive patients with
hepatic fibrosis stage <2, the SI and the SF ratio were significantly greater than in patients with fibrosis stage ≥2. There
was no difference in SMI between groups. In the cohort
assessed at baseline and 12 months later, transaminase activity
and SMI decreased significantly, and the SF ratio increased over
time. A multivariate analysis revealed the presence of the
PNPLA3 G allele and an increase in SF ratio (odds ratio, 7.406)
as predictive factors of ALT reduction >30% from baseline.
biopsy-proven NAFLD and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
>40 IU/L were enrolled. Liver function and body composition
were evaluated in 121 patients after 12 months. We evaluated
the relationship between histological findings, changes in liver
function, and the SMI, SI, and SF ratio.
Conclusions: Due to the high prevalence of obesity, we should
consider both skeletal muscle mass and body fat mass in the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD. The SF ratio could be a useful
index in sarcopenic NAFLD.
Results: Of the 156 patients enrolled, 13.5% and 26.3% were di-
Key words: NAFLD, PNPLA3, sarcopenia, SF ratio, SI
agnosed with sarcopenia with the SMI and SI. In patients with
INTRODUCTION
S
ARCOPENIA IS NOW a common problem not only
for elderly people, but also for people with diseases
such as renal disease, inflammatory disease, malignant tumors and chronic liver disease, including non-alcoholic
fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Sarcopenia, characterized by
a loss of skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and function, affects clinical outcomes, including quality of life,
infection rate, and survival in patients with cirrhosis.1–3
In European populations, approximately 0.5–1.0% of
skeletal muscle mass is lost per year after the age of
Correspondence: Dr Yuya Seko, Department of Molecular Gastroenterology
and Hepatology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho,
Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan. Email:
yuyaseko@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.
Financial support: None declared.
Received 19 December 2018; revision 17 January 2019; accepted 29 January
2019.
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
30 years, and up to 60% of patients with end-stage liver
disease had sarcopenia.4 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
is currently the most common liver disease worldwide, affecting an estimated 25% of the adult population,5 and is
the most common indication for liver transplantation.6 It
is a disease covering a wide spectrum, ranging from nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), which is usually a benign condition, to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which
can sometimes lead to liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma without significant alcohol consumption.7,8 The
prevalence of NAFLD is increasing rapidly in Asian countries because of westernized dietary patterns and a lack of
exercise. Recently, sarcopenia has become known as a
novel risk factor for the development of NAFLD.9 A clear
mechanism underlying the relationship between NAFLD
and sarcopenia remains unknown, but insulin resistance
(IR) and systemic inflammation could play a key role. Insulin resistance facilitates lipolysis and leads to free fatty
acid (FFA) flux in liver. Excessive FFA also inhibits the
growth hormone/insulin growth factor-1 axis, which
1
2
Y. Seko et al.
protects muscle from age-related loss.10 Because skeletal
muscle is the tissue responsible for glucose disposal, the
existence of sarcopenia promotes IR.11 Chronic inflammation injures the liver and leads to fibrosis progression.12 In
addition, cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α and
transforming growth factor-β exacerbate protein catabolism and lead to sarcopenia.13
There are several definitions of sarcopenia and methods
of diagnosis from some groups. The European Working
Group on Sarcopenia in Older People and the Asian
Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) recommend the
diagnosis of sarcopenia in elderly subjects based on gait
speed, grip strength, and skeletal muscle index
(SMI).14,15 The Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) published diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia in liver disease
based on grip strength and SMI in all ages.16 Bioelectrical
impedance analysis is widely used to measure skeletal
muscle mass because of its simplicity and lack of exposure
to radiation. In addition to these definitions, some
previous studies used original definitions to estimate
sarcopenia. The Foundation for the National Institutes of
Health (NIH) Sarcopenia Project defined the sarcopenia
index (SI; appendicular skeletal mass [ASM] to body mass
index [BMI] ratio) from nine sources of communitydwelling elderly cohorts. The Foundation defined a
sarcopenia cut-off value of SI <0.789 in men and <0.512
in women.17 Koo et al. adopted a definition of sarcopenia
of ASM to bodyweight ratio developed by the NIH
Sarcopenia Project.18 We previously reported that the ratio
of skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass (SF ratio) was associated with liver function independent of age and other
metabolic features in Japanese patients with NAFLD.19
These three indices include both skeletal muscle mass
and body fat mass. Thus, there are several definitions of
sarcopenia, and which definition is used generally reflects
the liver histology. It is still unclear which definition is
suitable for therapeutic target of Japanese patients with
NAFLD.
The aims of this study were to compare the SMI, SI, and
SF ratio on the association with liver histology and to determine the therapeutic target of these indices in clinical aspects of Japanese patients with NAFLD.
METHODS
Patients
F
ROM JANUARY 2014 to October 2017, 347 consecutive patients were diagnosed with NAFLD by liver biopsy findings of steatosis in ≥5% of hepatocytes and the
exclusion of other liver diseases, including viral hepatitis,
autoimmune hepatitis, and drug-induced liver disease at
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2019
our institution. Patients consuming more than 20 g alcohol per day and those with evidence of decompensated
liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma were excluded
from the study. Among patients who underwent a liver
biopsy, 128 were excluded because of a lack of body
composition data. Sixty-three patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <40 IU/L were also excluded. A total
of 156 patients were enrolled. A follow-up cohort comprised 121 patients who underwent serial body composition tests 12 months after baseline. No patients were
given additional oral medications during the follow-up period. We instructed patients to decrease caloric intake by
500–1000 kcal/day and undertake moderate-intensity exercise. All patients provided written informed consent at
the time of liver biopsy, and the study was carried out in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study
protocol was approved by the institution’s human research
committees.
Laboratory and clinical parameters
Venous blood samples were collected in the morning after
a 12-h overnight fast. Laboratory assays included blood
cell counts and measurements of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ALT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT),
total cholesterol, triglycerides, and fasting plasma glucose.
Parameters were measured with standard clinical chemistry laboratory techniques. The BMI was calculated as
weight (kg)/(height [m])2. Type 2 diabetes mellitus
(T2DM) was diagnosed according to the Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus or confirmed on the basis of patients being
prescribed antihyperglycemic T2DM agents. Patients with
serum cholesterol concentrations >220 mg/dL, triglyceride concentrations >160 mg/dL, or who were prescribed
antidyslipidemia agents were considered dyslipidemic.
Patients with systolic blood pressure >140 mmHg or
diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg, or who were
prescribed antihypertensive drugs were considered to have
hypertension.
Liver histology
All enrolled patients underwent a percutaneous liver biopsy under ultrasonic guidance. Liver specimens were embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin–eosin or
Masson’s trichrome. The specimens were evaluated by two
hepatic pathologists (N.M. and Y.S.) who were blinded to
the clinical findings. An adequate liver biopsy sample was
defined as a specimen of length >1.5 cm and/or having
more than 11 portal tracts. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
was defined as steatosis with lobular inflammation and
ballooning degeneration, with or without Mallory–Denk
Hepatology Research 2019
bodies or fibrosis. Patients with liver biopsy specimens
showing simple steatosis or steatosis with non-specific
inflammation were identified as the NAFL cohort. Histological grade and stage were scored as described.
Necroinflammatory grades of 1, 2, and 3 were defined as
mild, moderate, and severe, respectively, for hepatocellular
steatosis, ballooning, and inflammation (acinar and portal). The NAFLD activity score (NAS) was the sum of
steatosis, lobular inflammation, and hepatocellular ballooning scores. The NAS ranged from 0 to 8. The severity
of hepatic fibrosis (stage) was scored as follows: 1, zone
3 perisinusoidal fibrosis; 2, zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis
with portal fibrosis; 3, zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis and
portal fibrosis with bridging fibrosis; and 4, cirrhosis.20–22
Body composition and sarcopenia definition
We analyzed the body composition of participants using
the Inbody720 multifrequency impedance body composition analyzer (Inbody Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Body composition was measured in kilograms. The SMI was calculated
as appendicular skeletal muscle mass (kg)/(height [m])2.
As indicated in the sarcopenia diagnostic criteria of the
Japan Society of Hepatology,16 we defined a low SMI as
<7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.7 kg/m2 in women. The SI
was calculated as ASM (kg)/BMI (kg/m2). The NIH
Sarcopenia Project23 defined sarcopenia using the cut-off
points of SI <0.789 in men and <0.521 in women. The
SF ratio was calculated as ASM (kg)/body fat mass (kg).
Alanine aminotransferase response
We defined an ALT response as a decrease of 30% or more
from baseline, in accordance with a proposal by the NASH
Clinical Research Network.24 This definition was found to
have the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting an improvement in
the NAS and liver fibrosis.
DNA preparation and single nucleotide
polymorphism (SNP) genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using
DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). The
patatin-like phospholipase 3 (PNPLA3) SNP rs738409
was genotyped in each sample using TaqMan SNP
genotyping assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
CA, USA) with commercially available predesigned
SNP-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction
amplification and extension reactions according to the
manufacturer’s protocol. The precise protocol was carried
out in a manner similar to our previous study.25
Validity of SF ratio in sarcopenic NAFLD
3
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as numbers for qualitative data or as
medians for quantitative data. The distribution of subject
characteristics was assessed with the χ 2-test or Fisher’s exact
probability test, as appropriate. To determine the cut-off
point of the SF ratio to define sarcopenia, we calculated
the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp), and then constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves by
plotting the Se against (1 – Sp) at each value. The diagnostic performance of the SF ratio was assessed by analysis of
ROC curves. The most commonly used index of accuracy
was the AUROC, with values close to 1.0 indicating high
diagnostic accuracy. Statistical comparisons were undertaken with SPSS version 25 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL,
USA). All P-values <0.05 were calculated with a two-tailed
test and were considered significant.
RESULTS
Patient characteristics
T
ABLE 1 SHOWS THE patients’ clinical characteristics,
as well as laboratory and histological data at baseline.
A total of 64 patients (41.0%) received oral medication for
T2DM, 61 patients (39.1%) received oral medication for
dyslipidemia, and 10 patients (6.4%) received vitamin E.
The details of medication at baseline are described in
Table S1. This cohort included 82 (52.6%) female patients,
and the median age was 57.5 years. A total of 112 cases
(71.8%) were obese (BMI >25 kg/m2), and 117 cases
(75.0%) were diagnosed with NASH. Forty-four (28.2%)
of the 156 patients were Brunt stage 0, 54 (34.6%) were
stage 1, 37 (23.7%) were stage 2, 11 (7.1%) were stage 3,
and 10 (6.4%) had cirrhosis (stage 4). In this cohort, the
PNPLA3 rs738409 genotype frequencies were: CC, 18
(16.4%) patients; CG, 51 (46.4%) patients; and GG, 41
(37.3%) patients.
Prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with
NAFLD
We evaluated the relationship between histological features and the three indices. The median SI and the SF ratio
in the non-significant fibrosis group (hepatic fibrosis stage
<2) were significantly greater than those in the significant
fibrosis group (hepatic fibrosis stage ≥2) (P = 0.008 and
P = 0.047, respectively). The SI and the SF ratio in patients
with NAS <6 were also significantly greater than those in
patients with NAS ≥6 (P = 0.019 and P = 0.035, respectively) (Fig. 1). In this cohort, the SMI did not show a significant difference, regardless of fibrosis stage and NAS
(Fig. 1). With the SMI, the prevalence of sarcopenia was
21 (13.5%) patients. However, with the SI, the prevalence
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
4
Y. Seko et al.
Hepatology Research 2019
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease: Total cohort and follow-up cohort
Variable
Female gender
Age, years
PNPLA3, CC/CG/GG
NASH
Type 2 diabetes
mellitus
Hypertension
Albumin, g/dL
AST, IU/L
ALT, IU/L
GGT, IU/L
Platelet count,
×103/μL
Total cholesterol,
mg/dL
Triglycerides, mg/dL
LDL-C, mg/dL
HDL-C, mg/dL
FPG, mg/dL
HbA1c, %
NAS, 3/4/5/6Fibrosis stage,
0/1/2/3/4
BMI, kg/m2
SMI, kg/m2
SI
SF ratio
Total cohort
n = 156
Follow-up cohort
n = 121
82 (52.6)
57.5 (17–84)
18/51/41
117 (75.0)
79 (50.6)
69 (57.0)
56 (17–79)
15/38/34
96 (79.3)
62 (51.2)
66 (42.3)
4.4 (3.2–5.2)
51 (22–192)
66 (40–237)
63 (15–716)
215 (90–412)
54 (44.6)
4.4 (3.2–5.2)
52 (23–192)
67 (40–202)
69 (15–533)
217 (90–412)
201 (123–355)
205 (123–355)
132 (43–923)
123 (52–254)
52 (22–105)
106 (82–325)
6.3 (5.0–11.0)
35/49/31/41
44/54/37/11/10
122 (49–923)
126 (52–254)
53 (22–105)
106 (82–325)
6.3 (5.0–11.0)
22/39/24/36
30/41/31/10/9
26.9 (19.2–44.2)
7.36 (4.86–10.43)
0.70 (0.43–1.11)
0.77 (0.36–3.76)
27.2 (19.4–44.2)
7.37 (4.89–10.43)
0.68 (0.43–1.11)
0.74 (0.36–2.08)
Results are presented as a number (n) or n (%) for qualitative data or
as median (range) for quantitative data.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI,
body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GGT, γ-glutamyl
transpeptidase; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; NAS,
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score; SF, skeletal muscle mass
to body fat mass; SI, sarcopenia index; SMI, skeletal muscle mass
index.
was 41 (26.3%) patients. Only seven patients were diagnosed with sarcopenia by both indices. The concordance
rate of sarcopenia diagnosis in each index was 0.058. Next,
we determined the cut-off value of the SF ratio to define
sarcopenia. Figure 2 shows the ROC curves for the SF ratio
to differentiate sarcopenia based on the SI. The cut-off
values of the SF ratio were 0.90 in men and 0.56 in
women. The SF ratio had an AUROC of 0.880 in men
and 0.852 in women. At the cut-off value, the sensitivity
and specificity were 0.830/0.810 in men and 0.839/0.700
in women.
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Changes in liver function and body
composition in the follow-up cohort
A total of 121 patients underwent body composition tests
at baseline and 12 months postbaseline. We carried out
only nutrition and exercise therapy, and no patients were
given oral medication in the follow-up period. The serum
concentrations of AST, ALT, and GGT decreased significantly by the 12-month follow-up. In terms of body composition, not only BMI, but also SMI, decreased
significantly by the 12-month follow-up. The SF ratio increased significantly, from 0.74 to 0.76, but the SI did
not change significantly (P = 0.290) (Table 2).
Factors associated with ALT response
A total of 69 patients (57.0%) were ALT responders in this
study. Univariate analysis identified seven parameters that
correlated with ALT response: sex (female, P = 0.065),
PNPLA3 (G allele, P = 0.046), platelet count
(≤200 × 103/μL, P = 0.024), fibrosis stage (≥2, P = 0.044),
NAS (≥6, P = 0.072), SF ratio (increase, P < 0.001), and SI
(increase, P = 0.003). We undertook multivariate logistic
regression analysis with these factors. The adjusted odds
ratio (OR) of presence of the PNPLA3 G allele was 5.181
(95% confidence interval [CI], 1.134–23.81; P = 0.034),
and that of increased SF ratio was 7.406 (95% CI, 1.796–
30.54; P = 0.006) for ALT response (Table 3). The prevalence of ALT responders increased gradually with changes
in the SF ratio and the SI. The ALT response rate of patients
with a decreased SF ratio was 31.8%, and that in patients
with an increased SF ratio was 70.1%. Likewise, the prevalence of ALT responders with PNPLA3 CG/GG was 56.9%,
which was greater than that in patients with PNPLA3 CC
(26.7%) (Fig. 3).
DISCUSSION
W
E INVESTIGATED THE features of several
sarcopenia-related indices in this study. The diagnosis of sarcopenia was quite different between the SMI and
the SI. According to the SMI, which is adopted in the
AWGS and JSH criteria, the prevalence of sarcopenia was
13.5%. In contrast, 26.3% of patients were diagnosed with
sarcopenia by the SI. The difference was not only the proportion of sarcopenia. The concordance rate of sarcopenia
between the two indices was only 0.058. From the view of
liver histology, the SI and the SF ratio were associated with
both fibrosis stage and the NAS, but the SMI did not show
a significant relationship. Several factors, including age,
obesity, and T2DM, are known to be associated with liver
fibrosis. In Japanese non-viral liver disease patients, the
prevalence of NAFLD and significant liver fibrosis was
Hepatology Research 2019
Validity of SF ratio in sarcopenic NAFLD
5
Figure 1 Sarcopenia-related indices according to fibrosis stage and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) in Japanese patients. SF, skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass; SMI, skeletal muscle index.
Figure 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves of the skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass (SF) ratio for sarcopenia in Japanese men
(a) and women (b) with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
reported to be associated with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
level.26 Previously, Lee et al. reported that sarcopenia diagnosed by the SI was associated with significant liver fibrosis
independent of obesity and IR.9 In that study, they also
concluded that the existence of sarcopenia was associated
with a twofold increased risk of fibrosis. Several studies
reported a relationship between sarcopenia and hepatic
fibrosis;9,18,27 to the best of our knowledge, all of them
diagnosed sarcopenia with indices including both skeletal muscle mass and body fat mass, such as ASM/BMI
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
6
Y. Seko et al.
Hepatology Research 2019
Table 2 Characteristics of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in the follow-up cohort at baseline and 12 months
Patients with NAFLD
Variable
Age, years
Albumin, g/dL
AST, IU/L
ALT, IU/L
GGT, IU/L
Platelet count, ×103/μL
Total cholesterol, mg/dL
Triglycerides, mg/dL
LDL-C, mg/dL
HDL-C, mg/dL
FPG, mg/dL
BMI, kg/m2
SMI, kg/m2
SI
SF ratio
Baseline n = 121
12 months n = 121
P-value†
56 (17–79)
4.4 (3.2–5.2)
52 (23–192)
67 (40–202)
69 (15–533)
217 (90–412)
205 (123–355)
122 (49–923)
126 (52–254)
53 (22–105)
106 (82–325)
27.2 (19.4–44.2)
7.37 (4.89–10.43)
0.68 (0.43–1.11)
0.74 (0.36–2.08)
–
4.4 (3.0–7.7)
34 (14–139)
44 (12–262)
42 (14–360)
220 (93–419)
196 (55–280)
136 (40–809)
124 (54–217)
50 (28–94)
110 (84–251)
26.4 (19.2–46.2)
7.22 (4.92–9.67)
0.69 (0.45–1.09)
0.76 (0.38–2.41)
–
0.968
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.866
0.640
0.538
0.595
0.136
0.052
<0.001
<0.001
0.290
0.003
Results are the median (range) for quantitative data.
†Bold font for P-values indicates <0.05.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GGT, γ-glutamyl
transpeptidase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SF, skeletal muscle mass to body fat
mass; SI, sarcopenia index; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index.
Table 3 Factors associated with amelioration of alanine
aminotransferase >30% in patients with non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease (NAFLD)
Multivariate analysis
Variable
Sex
Category
1: male
2: female
PNPLA3
1: CC
2: CG/GG
Platelet count,
1: >200
×103/μL
2: ≤200
Fibrosis stage
1: 0, 1
2: 2, 3, 4
NAS
1: <6
2: ≥6
Change in SI
1: decrease
2: increase
Change in SF ratio 1: decrease
2: increase
OR (95% CI)†
P-value‡
1.772 (0.572–5.489) 0.321
5.181 (1.134–23.81) 0.034
3.714 (1.042–13.23) 0.043
1.396 (0.401–4.860) 0.600
1.283 (0.367–4.484) 0.696
1.354 (0.362–5.066) 0.652
7.406 (1.796–30.54) 0.006
†Estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
‡Bold font for P-values indicates <0.05.
CI, confidence interval; NAS, NAFLD activity score; OR, odds ratio; SF,
skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass; SI, sarcopenia index.
or ASM/body weight. Our results were consistent with
these previous data. Differences might be based on the
method used to diagnose sarcopenia. The AWGS used
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
two standard deviations below the mean muscle mass of
a young reference group as the cut-off value determination.15 In contrast, the Foundation for the National
Institutes of Health (FNIH) determined the cut-off value
of SI that best discriminated weakness (grip strength
<26 kg in men, <16 kg in women) in elderly subjects.17
Moreover, 67.6% of the study population of FNIH included overweight/obese patients. To evaluate sarcopenia
in patients with NAFLD precisely, we should choose an
index that includes not only skeletal muscle mass, but also
body composition.
Because the SF ratio was constructed with consideration
of body composition, including skeletal muscle mass and
body fat mass, we adopted the SI to set a cut-off value of
the SF ratio to diagnose sarcopenia. We defined the cutoff values of the SF ratio as <0.90 in men and <0.56 in
women. The AUROC of the SF ratio for sarcopenia was
0.880 in men and 0.852 in women. Our results showed
that the SF ratio can predict sarcopenia in NAFLD with
sufficient accuracy. Further analyses that verify the utility
of the SF ratio in a longitudinal study are needed.
Next, we investigated the relationship between
sarcopenia-related indices and changes in liver function.
In a previous study, muscle function reduction and
muscle volume loss in patients with liver cirrhosis
showed a significant relationship with decreasing serum
albumin levels.28 We also previously reported that
Hepatology Research 2019
Validity of SF ratio in sarcopenic NAFLD
7
Figure 3 Prevalence of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) responders according to change in (a) skeletal muscle mass to body fat mass
(SF) ratio, (b) sarcopenia index (SI), and (c) PNPLA3 genotype in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Change from
baseline to 12 months.
Japanese patients with NASH whose serum ALT level did
not decrease by at least 30% from baseline have a higher
risk of disease progression, including both liver fibrosis
and NAS.29 In that study, the inclusion criteria were
ALT >40 U/L at baseline; that was why we evaluated patients with ALT >40 U/L at baseline in this study. In this
study, changes in the SI and the SF ratio showed a significant correlation with ALT response. However, a change
in the SMI was not correlated with a change in ALT. Multivariate analysis revealed that presence of the PNPLA3 G
allele and an increase in the SF ratio were predictive factors for ALT response. The PNPLA3 gene was already
identified as the strongest genetic determinant of liver
fat concentration and serum level of ALT by genomewide association studies in European and Japanese populations.30,31 Additionally, the presence of the PNPLA3
G allele was associated with a greater reduction in
intrahepatic triglycerides in patients with NAFLD who
were undergoing lifestyle modification.32 Marzuillo
et al. reported that PNPLA3 GG homozygotes had greater
reductions in serum ALT level and waist-to-hip ratio in a
study of 129 obese children participating in a weight loss
program.33 They suggested that the interaction of visceral
adipocytes and PNPLA3 might account for this difference
in liver response. With regard to NAFLD patients with
T2DM, patients with the PNPLA3 G allele showed a
more positive correlation between change in HbA1c
and ALT response to therapy with alogliptin.34 Individuals who have the PNPLA3 G allele are possibly more
sensitive to the beneficial effect of lifestyle modification
and appropriate treatment. Patients with an increased
SF ratio had an OR of 7.406 for ALT response. It is already well known that sarcopenia can be an independent
risk factor for infection, lower quality of life, and might
even be prognostic in patients with cirrhosis.35,36 The
longitudinal effect of sarcopenia on the pathology of
early-stage NAFLD is still a matter of debate. To reduce
visceral fat is considered an essential target of therapeutic
strategies in NAFLD.37–39 A reduction in visceral fat leads
to improvements in insulin resistance, hypertension,
dyslipidemia, and chronic inflammation. Recently,
sarcopenic obesity has received attention as a novel risk
factor for NAFLD. Subjects with high fat mass and low
muscle mass had worse clinical outcomes compared
with subjects with sarcopenia or obesity alone.40,41 Actually, a reduction in skeletal muscle mass could
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
8
Y. Seko et al.
synergistically increase visceral fat in overweight subjects
with NAFLD.42 Although the mechanism underlying this
synergy is still unclear, leptin, which stimulates fat degradation in skeletal muscle and improves insulin sensitivity,43 and inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6
are thought to play a major role in this synergy.44,45
Shida et al. indicated that changes in body composition
were associated with a change in adipokines, myokines,
and hepatokines,42 thus supporting our result that
changes in the SF ratio were associated with ALT response. A reduction in body fat and an increase in skeletal muscle could have the greatest impact on liver
histology. However, it is too difficult a task to achieve
in an actual clinical situation. It is acceptable to maintain
skeletal muscle and reduce body fat as much as possible.
In this study, we defined the cut-off value of SF ratio to
diagnose sarcopenia. Furthermore, the SF ratio has superiority to other indices as a marker to reflect pathological
change in the longitudinal evaluation of patients with
NAFLD. Further studies that investigate whether patients
with sarcopenia diagnosed with the SF ratio have worse
mobility, quality of life, and prognosis are needed.
This study has several limitations. It is a retrospective
study undertaken at a single center, and the number of
patients studied was not large. A multicenter, prospective
study enrolling a larger number of patients will be required to draw firm conclusions. Next, we did not measure muscle strength in this study. Because sarcopenia is
characterized by the loss of skeletal muscle mass and
muscle strength, it is possible to overlook the size and
number of muscle fibers. However, the SI was defined
as discriminating patients with low grip strength. Thus,
we consider that our results are reliable. A major strength
of this study is that all enrolled patients were diagnosed
by liver biopsy. A second strength relates to the use of
bioelectrical impedance analysis to evaluate body composition. A previous report that compared bioelectrical
impedance analysis with dual X-ray absorptiometry
showed that the ability to estimate the amount of
skeletal muscle mass was the same with both methods.46
Furthermore, bioelectrical impedance analysis is a simple
and non-invasive method compared with dual X-ray
absorptiometry, including computed tomography or
magnetic resonance imaging.
In conclusion, the SI and the SF ratio reflect disease
severity and correlate well with changes in liver function
in patients with NAFLD. Japan is a rapidly aging society,
and the population of individuals with obesity is also
increasing. Our results suggest that increasing the SF
ratio could be an important therapeutic strategy in
NAFLD.
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2019
REFERENCES
1 Montano-Loza AJ, Meza-Junco J, Prado CM et al. Muscle
wasting is associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 166–73.
2 Shiraki M, Nishiguchi S, Saito M et al. Nutritional status and
quality of life in current patients with liver cirrhosis as
assessed in 2007–2011. Hepatol Res 2013; 43: 106–12.
3 Huisman EJ, Trip EJ, Siersema PD, van Hoek B, van Erpecum
KJ. Protein energy steatosis grades of 0, 1, 2, and 3, malnutrition predicts complications in liver cirrhosis. Eur J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 982–9.
4 Bhanji RA, Carey EJ, Yang L, Watt KD. The long winding road
to transplant: how sarcopenia and debility impact morbidity
and mortality on the waitlist. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;
15: 1492–7.
5 Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L,
Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease – meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence,
and outcomes. Hepatology 2016; 64: 73–84.
6 Rinella ME. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. JAMA 2015; 313: 2263–73.
7 Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE et al. The diagnosis and
management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice
guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver
Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the
American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology 2012;
55: 2005–23.
8 Watanabe S, Hashimoto E, Ikejima K et al. Evidence based
clinical practice guidelines for nonalcoholic fatty liver
disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. J Gastroenterol 2015;
50: 364–77.
9 Lee YH, Kim SU, Song K et al. Sarcopenia is associated with
significant liver fibrosis independently of obesity and insulin
resistance in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008–2011). Hepatology 2016; 63: 776–86.
10 Kalyani RR, Corriere M, Ferrucci L. Age-related and diseaserelated muscle loss: the effect of diabetes, obesity, and other
diseases. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2: 819–29.
11 Srikanthan P, Hevener AL, Karlamangla AS. Sarcopenia
exacerbates obesity-associated insulin resistance and
dysglycemia: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10805.
12 Martin-Dominguez V, Gonzalez-Casas R, Mendoza-JimenezRidruejo J, Garcia-Buey L, Moreno-Otero R. Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Rev
Esp Enferm Dig 2013; 105: 409–20.
13 Phillips T, Leeuwenburgh C. Muscle fiber specific apoptosis
and TNF-α signaling in sarcopenia are attenuated by lifelong calorie restriction. FASEB J 2005; 19: 668–70.
14 Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing
2010; 39: 412–23.
15 Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir
Assoc 2014; 15: 95–101.
Hepatology Research 2019
16 Nishikawa H, Shiraki M, Hiramatsu A, Moriya K, Hino K,
Nishiguchi S. Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for
sarcopenia in liver disease (1st edition): recommendation
from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment
criteria. Hepatol Res 2016; 46: 951–63.
17 Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE et al. The FNIH sarcopenia
project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci
2014; 69: 547–58.
18 Koo BK, Kim D, Joo SK et al. Sarcopenia is an independent risk
factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and significant fibrosis. J Hepatol 2017; 66: 123–31.
19 Mizuno N, Seko Y, Kataoka S et al. Increase in the skeletal
muscle mass to body fat mass ratio predicts the decline in
transaminase in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 160–70.
20 Brunt EM, Janney CG, Di Bisceglie AM, Neuschwander-Tetri
BA, Bacon BR. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a proposal for
grading and staging the histological lesions. Am J Gastroenterol
1999; 94: 2467–74.
21 Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC,
McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases: a spectrum
of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 1999;
116: 1413–9.
22 Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty
liver disease. Hepatology 2005; 41: 1313–21.
23 Cawthon PM, Peters KW, Shardell MD et al. Cutpoints for low
appendicular lean mass that identify older adults with clinically significant weakness. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;
69: 567–75.
24 Hoofnagle JH, Van Natta ML, Kleiner DE et al. Nonalcoholic
Steatohepatitis Clinical Research Network (NASH CRN). Vitamin E and changes in serum alanine aminotransferase levels
in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 134–43.
25 ishioji K, Mochizuki N, Kobayashi M et al. The impact of
PNPLA3 rs738409 genetic polymorphism and weight gain
≥10 kg after age 20 on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in
non-obese Japanese individuals. PLoS One 2015; 10:
e0140427.
26 Tanaka K, Takahashi H, Hyogo H et al. Epidemiological
survey of hemoglobin A1c and liver fibrosis in a
general population with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Hepatol Res 2018; https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.13282.
27 Petta S, Ciminnisi S, Di Marco V et al. Sarcopenia is
associated with severe liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2017;
45: 510–18.
28 Hiraoka A, Michitaka K, Izumoto H et al. Relative changes in
handgrip strength and skeletal muscle volume in patients
with chronic liver disease over a 2-year observation period.
Hepatol Res 2018; 48: 502–8.
29 Seko Y, Sumida Y, Tanaka S et al. Serum alanine aminotransferase predicts the histological course of non-alcoholic
Validity of SF ratio in sarcopenic NAFLD
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
9
steatohepatitis in Japanese patients. Hepatol Res 2015; 45:
E53–E61.
Speliotes EK, Yerges-Armstrong LM, Wu J et al. Genome-wide
association analysis identifies variants associated with
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease that have distinct effects on
metabolic traits. PLoS Genet 2011; 7: e1001324.
Kawaguchi T, Sumida Y, Umemura A et al. Genetic polymorphisms of the human PNPLA3 gene are strongly associated
with severity of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in Japanese.
PLoS One 2012; 7: e38322.
Shen J, Wong GL, Chan HL et al. PNPLA3 gene polymorphism
and response to lifestyle modification in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 30:
139–46.
Marzuillo P, Grandone A, Perrone L, del Giudice EM. Weight
loss allows the dissection of the interaction between abdominal fat and PNPLA3 (adiponutrin) in the liver damage of
obese children. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 1143–4.
Kan H, Hyogo H, Ochi H et al. Influence of the rs738409 polymorphism in patatin-like phospholipase 3 on the treatment
efficacy of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hepatol Res 2016; 46: E146–E153.
Merli M, Lucidi C, Giannelli V et al. Cirrhotic patients are at
risk for health care-associated bacterial infections. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 979–85.
Fujiwara N, Nakagawa H, Kudo Y et al. Sarcopenia, intramuscular fat deposition, and visceral adiposity independently
predict the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol
2015; 63: 131–40.
Finelli C, Tarantino G. Is visceral fat reduction necessary to favour metabolic changes in the liver? J Gastrointestin Liver Dis
2012; 21: 205–8.
Bouchi R, Nakano Y, Fukuda T et al. Reduction of visceral fat
by liraglutide is associated with ameliorations of hepatic
steatosis, albuminuria, and micro-inflammation in type 2 diabetic patients with insulin treatment: a randomized control
trial. Endocr J 2017; 64: 269–81.
Houghton D, Thoma C, Hallsworth K et al. Exercise reduces
liver lipids and visceral adiposity in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a randomized controlled trial. Clin
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 96–102.
Kob R, Bollheimer LC, Bertsch T et al. Sarcopenic obesity: molecular clues to a better understanding of its pathogenesis?
Biogerontology 2015; 16: 15–29.
Prado CM, Wells JC, Smith SR, Stephan BC, Siervo M.
Sarcopenic obesity: a critical appraisal of the current evidence.
Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 583–601.
Shida T, Akiyama K, Oh S et al. Skeletal muscle mass to visceral fat area ratio is an important determinant affecting
hepatic conditions of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J
Gastroenterol 2018; 53: 535–47.
Dyck DJ. Adipokines as regulators of muscle metabolism and
insulin sensitivity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2009; 34: 396–402.
Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Baumgartner RN et al. Sarcopenia,
obesity, and inflammation – results from the trial of
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
10
Y. Seko et al.
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition and novel cardiovascular risk factors study. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 428–34.
45 Schrager ME, Metter EJ, Simonsick E et al. Sarcopenic obesity
and inflammation in the InCHIANTI study. J Appl Physiol
2007; 102: 919–25.
46 Yu SC, Powell A, Khow KS, Visvanathan R. The performance
of five bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations
against dual X-ray absorptiometry in estimating appendicular
skeletal muscle mass in an adult Australian population. Nutrients 2016; 29(8): 189.
© 2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2019
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A
DDITIONAL SUPPORTING INFORMATION may be
found online in the Supporting Information section
at the end of the article.
Table S1 Details of medications at baseline in this study.