ELECTROACOUSTIC, CREATIVE, AND JAZZ: MUSICIANS NEGOTIATING
BOUNDARIES
Robert J. Gluck
Department of Music, University at Albany
gluckr@albany.edu
ABSTRACT
2. ELECTROACOUSTIC MUSIC IN JAZZ
Throughout its history, electroacoustic music has viewed
itself as distinct from what are perceived as popular
musical forms. This is problematic because a parallel
experimental musical universe has existed within jazz and
other African-American musical traditions. This
presentation
explores
collaborations
between
electroacoustic and jazz musicians during the 1960s and
early 1970s, through the lens of the personal experiences
of members of Herbie Hancock’s “Mwandishi” band, and
of electroacoustic musicians including Richard Teitelbaum
and Gordon Mumma. The discussion interrelates racial
and musical segregation, and argues for the inclusion of
jazz and “creative music” forms within the domain of
electroacoustic music.
The free jazz, aka creative music aesthetic of the 1960s
and 1970s in particular reflected great openness to new
musical ideas, while remaining grounded in earlier
traditions. That movement “… reflected an AfricanAmerican tendency to enrich artistic expression with the
sonic textures of everyday life … [in this case] through the
arcane language of modernist concert music …In short,
free jazz had achieved a tenuous balance between black
vernacularism and radical change.” (Radano, 1994)
Especially worthy of note in this regard is the work of the
Association for the Advancement of Creative Musicians
(AACM) in Chicago and, after 1980, New York, and most
relevant to a discussion of connections between jazz and
electronic music, pianist and multi-instrumentalist Muhal
Richard Abrams, saxophonist Anthony Braxton, violinist
Leroy Jenkins, and trombonist George Lewis (Lewis 1996,
2002, 2008). Other musicians with related sensibilities
have included Marion Brown, Oliver Lake, Joe McPhee,
and Don Cherry.
All of these people, with the addition of Herbie
Hancock, whose early 1970s “Mwandishi” sextet defies
Hancock’s popular image as a more mainstream jazz
musician, have engaged in collaborations with electronic
musicians: Braxton with Richard Teitelbaum, David
Rosenboom, Gordon Mumma and, in the context of MEV,
the anarchic, collectivist live electronic ensemble Music
Electtronica Viva, Alvin Curran; Leroy Jenkins with
Richard Teitelbaum and Joel Chadabe; George Lewis with
Richard Teitelbaum and others; Marion Brown with Elliot
Schwartz; Don Cherry with Jon Appleton; Steve Lacy with
MEV; Joe McPhee with John Snyder and later, Pauline
Oliveros; Oliver Lake with Ivan Pequeno; and Herbie
Hancock with Patrick Gleeson. George Lewis (Lewis
2000) and Muhal Richard Abrams engaged their own
electronics within their work. Teitelbaum has also
collaborated with AACM trumpeter Wadada Leo Smith
and saxophonist Roscoe Mitchell, as well as a number of
important jazz musicians including Andrew Cyrille, Lee
Konitz, Joe McPhee, Marilyn Crispell, and Jimmy
Garrison.
The incorporation of electronics in jazz, in the form of
electric or electronic instruments, actually predates the
AACM. Pianist Sun Ra, whose creative work in Chicago
1. INTRODUCTION
The history of electroacoustic music is often described as
an offspring of Euro-American Art music. The present
author’s previous writings have sought to recast this
history in a more international, culturally specific manner.
Within the United States, one consequence of the
conventionally drawn line of descent is the separation of
electronic music from other experimentalist traditions,
particularly African-American. George Lewis (Lewis
1996) has observed that electronic music in fact evolved in
parallel with, and at times has been informed by AfricanAmerican musical traditions, jazz in particular. This
should not be surprising since jazz, an inherently
improvisational art form, has historically provided fertile
ground for exploration in response to new social, political
and musical ideas.
I use the term “jazz” advisedly because some have
viewed it as a means of limiting and segregating black
musicians from the breadth of the fullness of all musical
practices. I use it here for its usefulness as a concise term,
albeit with some caution. This paper explores examples
where musicians have crossed boundaries and engaged in
collaborations between the jazz world and electronic
music.
preceded the founding of the AACM, performed with the
electric piano as early as 1956, the Clavioline, an early
electronic keyboard instrument in 1965, and by 1970, with
Mini Moog synthesizers. Sun Ra preferred not to be
associated with the “avant-garde,” a distinction lost on
most who have listened to his bands during these periods.
His recorded electric piano work was the first in a jazz
setting, a decade before the instrument appeared in the
music of Josef Zawinul and subsequently within the
context of Miles Davis’ late 1960s quintet, Herbie
Hancock and Chick Corea. During this same period, Eddie
Harris explored the use of electronics with his saxophone
using the Selmer Varitone, which added reverberation and
octave doubling. The work of Muhal Richard Abrams, a
co-founder of the AACM, and a student of electronic
music at Governors State University in Chicago with
Richard McCreary in 1973, was a model closer to
electroacoustic music. Abrams had already begun to
explore aspects of electronic music in his first recording,
‘Levels and Degrees of Light’ (Abrams 1967). In this
series of compositions scored for acoustical instruments
and voice, Abrams uses subtly shifting amounts and depths
of reverberation to suggest changing aspects of light.
Electronics have remained a significant element in his
work ever since.
The music of George Lewis, a younger AACM
colleague of Abrams, intensely straddles jazz and live
electronics. Lewis describes his composition/computer
program ‘Voyager’ (1985-1993) as “a nonhierarchical,
interactive musical environment that privileges
improvisation.” (Lewis 2000) The Voyager computer
program consists of multiple improvising players that can
combine to create ensembles. The character of those
players is determined by generative algorithms within the
software, or influenced by human players whose
improvisations are being analyzed by the computer. There
results can be multi-layered, melodically complex, varied
in timbre, simultaneously multi-rhythmic and arrhythmic,
and intentionally unpredictable. A performance of
‘Voyager’ is aesthetically in keeping with Robert L.
Douglas’ description of Afrological culture as
“multidominant,” “the multiple use of colors in intense
degrees, or the multiple use of textures, design patterns, or
shapes.” (Douglas 1991, cited in Lewis 2000) A 2005
collaboration between George Lewis, Muhal Richard
Abrams and Roscoe Mitchell, “Streaming,” incorporates
Lewis’s more recent work engaging electronics within an
improvisatory musical fabric. (Abrams, Lewis and
Mitchell 2006)
In a more popular music vein is Charles Stepney’s
musical arranging and studio-based production work at
Chess Records. Stepney’s best known work, with the
psychedelic band Rotary Connection, utilizes numerous
creative approaches to sound design, influenced, he
observed, by ideas about timbre from Henry Cowell. One
poignant example is found throughout his work, where
Stepney treats singer Minnie Riperton’s five-octave vocal
range like a wailing Theremin. One example is their 1969
cover of the song ‘Sunshine of Your Love’.
3. MUSICIANS NAVIGATING RACE
It is common for African-American and other jazz
musicians to have studied European classical music. It is
less common for classical musicians to have exposure to or
training in non-European musical traditions. Herbie
Hancock recalls that during the late 1960s: “I was listening
to Trane [John Coltrane] and Ornette and, of course, the
stuff with Miles [Davis] and Gil Evans had of course
always been interesting to me. And I was listening to some
contemporary classical composers, too, like Messiaen and
Debussy, and Stravinsky and Penderecki. Also Bartok.” In
1964, Hancock told an interviewer that he was listening to
a work by John Cage and Stockhausen’s Gesang der
Jünglinge, commenting: “it is fascinating. I haven’t as yet
been able to absorb it into my emotional makeup. I’ve
been affected by it.” (Mehegan 1964)
Two of Hancock’s Mwandishi band mates recall quite
clearly their exposure to an eclectic assortment of music,
including classical, early in their lives. Drummer Billy
Hart: “Outside of [singer and pianist] Shirley Horn, my
biggest inspiration in music is John Coltrane… My
grandmother, even though I never really heard her play the
piano, had been a concert pianist. So, I guess in some way
through her I had gotten some knowledge about the
European classical repertoire. Between that and movies; I
remember being really attracted by ‘Sheherazade’ by
Rimsky-Korsakov. And that was even before I knew that I
liked music.” Saxophonist Bennie Maupin: “Where I was
growing up in Detroit, you were automatically exposed to
all that church music, blues, the beginnings of R&B and
all those things that came out of Motown. Classical
musicians came there; they had emigrated from Europe…
great teachers ended up being there, in the unified school
district of Detroit. They all played in the Detroit
Symphony Orchestra. It was a place to get some good
training, so I kind of came up through that.”
The musical crossover between races was, however,
largely unidirectional, as educator, writer and drummer
Philip Royster observes about Chicago in the late 1940s
and 1950s: “Audiences were rigidly segregated, with
dominant whites having access to black clubs, but not vice
versa. White musicians visited black nightspots in order to
listen to and transcribe what they were hearing.” Parallel
issues existed in New York City’s clubs. For some white
musicians, the discovery of jazz was a revelation and
involved maybe a degree of intrigue and behavior
considered by some to be transgressive.
Gordon Mumma: “I followed the growth of Charlie
Parker, Miles Davis, Mingus, Cecil Taylor, Coleman,
Coltrane, Thelonious Monk, and company. The closer to
the "edge" the more I was interested in their artistic
virtuosity. I still carry awe and admiration for those in the
1940s and earlier… In the 1950s one of my college
roommates, a black jazz trombonist, introduced me to
much of the still "underground." There was much cultural
and intellectual intermingling following the 2nd World
War, and that was part of the momentum that pushed the
United States governments to gradually remove the laws
that enforced segregation. That was also a complicated
time because it was illegal for people of different color to
share the same living quarters, and my parents received
notice of my violation of the law. That law was in the state
of Michigan where College and University housing was
segregated. The concert band I performed with had to
leave the colored people [the term used at that time] home
when we toured to other states that prohibited people of
different color from performing on stage together. Even
the recording companies, e.g. RCA, had separate
catalogues and stores that segregated "race music”… My
use of the term "underground" is fairly wide, but it served
as a cover-word for places "one wasn't supposed to go,"
for example south of Detroit's 9-mile Road was where I
traveled to the stores that sold “race records”. It was still
discouraged, and uncommon, for a white guy to go there,
but I was accompanied by a black friend.”
Richard Teitelbaum: “I first listened to jazz
recordings in high school, and I heard Louis Armstrong
perform at the Paramount Theater in New York and it
blew me away. I was in the back row of the balcony and
his first note was the loudest thing I ever heard. [During
college] my main interests were Stravinsky and Bartok.
And then I started getting interested in Schoenberg and
Webern, more in graduate school, and Stockhausen and
jazz. I liked bebop a lot … I got really into Coltrane
around 1960, and I went to hear his quartet in a club and,
by chance, during a recording session at A&R Studios.
Steve Lacy took me to hear him several times during the
period of ‘Ascension’… And then I also was getting
involved with free jazz, including Albert Ayler. When I
got to Italy, I was still writing instrumental music, but I
was hanging out with Steve Lacy, Don Cherry, Karl
Berger, Gato Barbieri and Ornette Coleman and listening
to more jazz than classical or electronic music. I was really
quite obsessed with the notion that noise was something
shared in common between the jazz of that period and
noise music, electronic music. So I had a very conscious
awareness of the connection between improvised music,
free improvised music and electronic music.” Teitelbaum
benefited from being in Europe where there was far more
interchange between black and white artists, writers and
musicians than in the United States.
Patrick Gleeson, the Irish Catholic synthesizer player
and sound designer selected by Herbie Hancock to join the
Mwandishi band relates: “My best [high school] friend,
Jeff and I fell in love with jazz to a degree we didn't even
understand. I think in high school this was a well-kept
secret… [we] would hole up in his family den and listen to
Benny Goodman, Art Tatum, Teddy Wilson, etc., and
then, as puberty approached we began standing outside the
doors of clubs in the "colored district," until someone
taking the door would let us in, warning us, more often
than not, that "I had nothing to do with this, and you just
go in, go to the back, and SIT DOWN."
Anthony Braxton grew up loving early rock and roll
and discovered jazz as a teenager. It was in the Army,
stationed in Korea, that he began to fully appreciate the
free jazz movement, particularly the music of Ornette
Coleman, Cecil Taylor, late John Coltrane, and Albert
Ayler. During that same period, Braxton discovered
Twentieth Century European music, as he relates in an
interview with Ronald Radano: “[In Seoul, Korea] I
discovered Schoenberg. Until that time I had always
thought of Western art-music as something only relevant
to white people; it had nothing to do with me and my life. I
played in the orchestra on clarinet, I played my part, I
played my Bach, but it never touched me…Experiencing
Schoenberg[‘s Opus 11], however, suddenly made
everything more meaningful… It opened up the next
whole aspect of my life. It affected me in as profound a
way as anything has ever affected me…” (Radano 1993)
Braxton connected with the AACM immediately upon his
return to Chicago from military service. It was at that point
that his association with Muhal Richard Abrams began,
and when he first read John Cage’s book ’Silence’. By
1968, Braxton had completed his first recording for solo
saxophone, ‘For Alto’ (Braxton 1968) and composed his
first notated works in a contemporary art music idiom,
moving towards his unique synthesis of musical
languages.
4. INTERRACIAL COLLABORATIONS
Given the depth of social, political and cultural segregation
in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s, it is notable
that interracial collaborations between jazz and electronic
musicians indeed took place. Gordon Mumma believes
that connections between people within particular musical
circles was “for me more social-cultural rather than
artistic-stylistic. They were clusters of individuals that
grew larger in their achievements because they worked
and played together. For most, their individual "origins"
made no or little difference, black or white, jazz or
classical, street people or academics, electronic or
acoustic. Whatever.” Speaking more generally about
musical associations in New York City during the 1960s
and 70s, Joel Chadabe considers these to have been often
based on “personal friendships and artist affinities; and
very often, personal friendships were based on artist
affinities, and certainly, different kinds of personalities
with different kinds of goals.”
met with the extraordinary Roscoe Mitchell, who now is
on the faculty at Mills College, and was one of the earliest
organizers of the AACM. Of my connections with the
"jazz" oriented performers during the 1960s and 1970s, I'd
say that it was Braxton who became my closest connection
and friend. Braxton in a sense doesn't fit in any category;
he's too universal, open minded and evolutionary in his
innovative creative work.”
Braxton was one of the participants, along with
Gordon Mumma, David Behrman, Leroy Jenkins, and
artist Robert Watts, in their 1970 collaborative multimedia
work ‘Communication in a Noisy Environment.’ Placed
separately on three different floors of Automation House
in New York and interconnected by televisions and
loudspeakers, the musicians played an eclectic assortment
of instruments amidst a dizzying array of projected images
and objects. The New York Times reported that: “The
planned chaos of image and sound was gradually raised to
a level at which communication was impossible.”
(Ericson 1970)
Figure 1. Anthony Braxton and Richard Teitelbaum in
2008. Image courtesy of the photographer, Hiroko
Sakurazawa.
It is fair to say that personal friendships, supported by
artistic commonalities, were at the center of many of the
collaborations between jazz and electronic musicians.
Anthony Braxton’s friendship with Richard Teitelbaum
happened by chance, but resulted in an association that has
continued for decades. Teitelbaum recalls: “I met Braxton
in 1969 in a cow pasture in Belgium, in a place called
Amougies, a big festival that was one of the original
attempts to bring jazz, mostly rock but some free jazz and
a few wacky token electronic avant-garde types to play in
the same festival. Braxton played there with his trio with
Leroy Jenkins and Wadada Leo Smith. The Art Ensemble
of Chicago played there. It was an extraordinary
performance and the first time I heard them and met them.
MEV was part of that. [Before then] I had barely known
anything about any of the AACM guys.” By this time,
Braxton’s
musical
interests
included
Karlheinz
Stockhausen and John Cage as well as jazz. After
returning from a year in Paris in 1970, Braxton began to
tour with MEV.
Gordon Mumma first met AACM members in March
1965, “when Robert Ashley and I, along with Peter Yates,
gave a concert and lecture series at the Chicago Musical
College of Roosevelt University… From the late 1960s
and 1970s "jazz" oriented artists I connected with included
Braxton, Jenkins, Lacy, Lewis, etc. Braxton became a
particularly good friend, and I recall that we first met when
he was visiting a rehearsal of the Merce Cunningham
Dance Co. Our interconnections went on from there. The
connections keep growing; in the past few years I have
Figure 2. Anthony Braxton, Leroy Jenkins and Gordon
Mumma at Automation House in New York, 1970. Image
courtesy of Gordon Mumma.
5. MWANDISHI HERBIE HANCOCK
The evolution of electronics in Herbie Hancock’s
“Mwandishi” band (1970-1973) unfolded in a different
way. Hancock was the leader of a relatively lyrical
ensemble founded in 1969, after departing from the Miles
Davis Quintet. Hancock recalls the evolution towards a
more exploratory style of playing: “[At first] it really
wasn’t that avant-garde Mwandishi sound. It really started
out with me playing ‘Speak Like a Child’ and songs from
that record. And it was a much softer, more gentle kind of
sound. I was trying to come out of a Gil Evans influence,
that combination of instruments, those arrangements.
When we were playing that more gentle kind of music in
the beginning, the avant-garde was having a bigger and
bigger influence on many of the more curious jazz
musicians, more mainstream post-bebop players or
whatever you want to call that, and with me too. So the
band I had was getting further and further out. We were
playing those arrangements, but after we’d leave the head,
the playing was getting further and further out by the time
I’d made some changes in personnel of the band…. When
the personnel changed, there was a whole new spiritual
feeling with the band that expanded the playing, opened
the veins of the lifeblood of the playing of the band, into
more intuitive playing than had happened with the
previous band. I think we started in something like
September or October 1970. We got this gig at London
House [in Chicago]. We were already into the avant-garde,
into playing sounds and exploring new sonic territories.
London House had traditionally been a club that had piano
trios there.” Trumpeter Eddie Henderson recalls that the
regular audience ceased attending and were replaced in
even larger numbers by members of the most exploratory
Chicago jazz musicians, a number of them connected with
the AACM. After this point, trombonist Julian Priester
remembers: “There were no restrictions ... everyone was
listening to each other, leaving our egos out of the process,
just responding to what the overall group invents.”
Hancock’s sound was also becoming increasingly
electric as an Echoplex and other devices gradually
became an integral extension of his electric piano playing.
Working in San Francisco, producer David Rubinson
introduced the pianist to the wide range of post-production
studio techniques that he had developed as a producer of
psychedelic rock bands, in particular the United States of
America and the Chambers Brothers, and by listening to
music from the Columbia-Princeton Electronic Music
Center while working at Columbia Records in New York
City. With the help of engineer Fred Catera, Rubinson and
Hancock integrated echo and tape feedback into band
members’ increasingly abstract studio performances, for
example, Billy Hart’s already dense and shimmering
gestures on the drum kit. (Hancock 1971)
Rubinson also sought to engage Herbie Hancock fully
in the studio production, a shift away from standard
practice that offered musicians little control over their own
work. Rubinson recalls: “...what really happened with
Herbie was that his creativity was exposed to the entire
creative process of making records and making music. He
was insightful and he just opened up like a flower ... and
expressed himself in the whole process ... It increased his
palette of colors and effects.” Time magazine opined:
“Miles Davis protégé Herbie Hancock shows what jazz
might have sounded like if it had come up the river from
Darmstadt, that European mecca of the avant garde,
instead of New Orleans.” (Time 1972)
The Mwandishi band more fully entered the world of
electronics on their second recording, ‘Crossings’
(Hancock 1972). Hancock had expressed an interest in
learning to play a synthesizer and Rubinson recommended
that he visit synthesizer player and sound designer Patrick
Gleeson. Gleeson had gained experience with synthesizers
and tape techniques at the San Francisco Tape Music
Center and while working with members of the Ann
Halprin Dance Workshop in the early 1960s. He
demonstrated for Hancock the kinds of interpolations one
might add to the largely completed studio recordings.
Hancock liked what he heard and urged Gleeson to record
what he was doing on one of the compositions, ‘Quasar’,
and then on a second, ‘Water Torture’, both by Bennie
Maupin. The result was a highly integrated blend of
acoustic and electric instrumental performances, electronic
sounds, and post-production processing. Hancock
subsequently invited Gleeson to join his touring band,
resulting in a fuller incorporation of electronics into the
band’s musical vocabulary.
Gleeson purchased an Arp 2600 synthesizer, far more
portable than the Moog III in his studio, and he became the
seventh member of the Herbie Hancock Mwandishi
“Sextet.” He was actually the eighth member if one counts
sound engineer Fundi (William Bonner), who all of the
band members considered to be integral. Fundi had at his
disposal a quadraphonic sound system and an Echoplex of
his own, allowing him to suddenly spatialise and process
everyone’s sounds, heightening the electronic feel of the
music.
Incorporating synthesizer sounds into a tight-knit
group of seasoned jazz players proved challenging. But as
Julian Priester recalls: “By the time I had completely
accepted the change, the progress, the progression of
technology, that I viewed it [Patrick’s synthesizer] as an
extension of what we were doing acoustically, so it fit.”
For some, it expanded the pallet of sound resources,
Bennie Maupin observes: “it was for me like a breath of
fresh air.” And over time, Patrick Gleeson felt warmly
welcomed: “[When I joined this deeply Afrocentric band]
I felt like I’d gone home. I felt like I’d found my place.
This is where I belong.”
Musically, Gleeson had to develop a new vocabulary
of sounds and gestures appropriate to this musical setting.
He created sculpted bands of white noise to back soloists
and a wide range of non-pitched sounds to join in the
ensemble. Herbie Hancock crafted new compositions that
were keenly suited to the increasingly rhythmic drive of
the band and its incorporation of new sounds. ‘Rain
Dance,’ which opens the band’s third and final recording
“Sextant” (Hancock 1973), is a celebration of the analog
synthesizer’s sequencer, a device that allowed a musician
to store a series of voltages, which in this case were
translated into pitched ostinati. Tape loops abounded
during the studio sessions and ‘Raiin Dance’ features
overlapping layers of ostinati, shifting in pitch, timbre and
rhythmic complexity. Gleeson’s contribution to “Sextant”
was substantial. Unfortunately, the band proved financially
unsustainable and Hancock yearned for what he terms a
more “earthy” music, leading him to change directions and
organize the more populist and financially successful
Headhunters.
Figure 3. Patrick Gleeson and Herbie Hancock in 1977.
Image courtesy Patrick Gleeson.
The development of the Mwandishi band as an
electroacoustic ensemble took place within a more
commercial context than most of the other jazz-electronic
collaborations noted in this presentation. With the
exception of some of Anthony Braxton’s work on Arista
Records in the early 1970s, Herbie Hancock is thus one of
the only examples discussed here whose work was
documented on a major record label, first Warner Brothers
and then Columbia Records. Even so, what the band
delivered was clearly not what the companies were
seeking! Operating within a jazz milieu, the Mwandishi
band also tended to play within the commercial context of
clubs. Patrick Gleeson was, like his fellow band mates, a
hired member of Hancock’s band. But even so, what
distinguished this ensemble was a collective-like
atmosphere of friendship, mutuality and camaraderie,
more like than unlike some of the other collaborations
discussed. Relationships were governed as much by
growing affinities and mutual affection as they were by
contractual obligation. Still, when bandleader Hancock
considered the band to have reached its end point, it was
over.
6. ADDRESSING CHALLENGES
If segregationist white America tended to separate white
and black musicians, as well as musical styles, there were
elements within African-American culture that looked
askance on the use of electronics in black music. One
cultural critic (Wellburn 1971) wrote: “... [rock musicians
emerged from] a technological lineage extending through
John Cage, Stockhausen, Edgard Varese, all the way back
to Marconi and the wireless. White rock is a technology,
not a real music... black musicians should re-evaluate the
technological intrusions now threatening our music; times
may come when that technology will be useless. Our
music is our key to survival.” And the critical response to
the increasingly electronic and exploratory direction of the
Mwandishi band was often very negative, particularly in
the jazz periodical Down Beat. One staff writer, Harvey
Siders (Siders 1972) was confused by the sounds and the
open-ended improvisations. Criticism of the synthesizer in
particular was harsh. Pete Welding (Welding 1972)
referred to “freaky, eerie sequences of ‘spacey’ effects,”
“empty, overdramatic bluster - the most obnoxious kind of
speciously trippy music.” Clearly, the blurring of
distinctions between jazz and electronic music was
threatening to some. Yet there were others who
appreciated Mwandishi’s music. Bill McLarney
(McLarney 1972): “This group has gotten a lot of strange
reviews - by earnest men, one supposes, with reasons for
their reactions ... What matters is that this music, these
artists, have the ability to get you next to yourself and
maybe some night, even to work a transformation – if you
are ready.”
The idea of post-production was unfamiliar to many
jazz musicians and, for some, of little interest. Eddie
Henderson notes: “when I finished playing the last note on
the record, that was it for me.” Most members of the band,
in fact, seemed little interested in the recording process,
having never experienced it other than as documentation.
When asked to reflect about the band’s recordings, Bennie
Maupin commented: “I don’t listen to those recordings. I
hardly listen to any of that [what I’ve recorded]. I’m
composing now.” A jazz ethic of playing in the moment
seems to have pervaded the sensibilities of the Mwandishi
band, although those among them who listened to the
results were pleased, once they recovered from the initial
shock. Although I have no specific evidence, I wonder
whether playing in a band that drew so heavily on
electronics was perceived as a career risk for jazz
musicians. Also, prior to the 1970s, electronic instruments
lacked the technical means relevant to idiomatic jazz
performance, as Joel Chadabe notes: “Electronic music
performance before the 1980s was practically 100% in the
avant-garde, like David Tudor and Gordon Mumma,
working with makeshift instruments. For the most part, it
was people doing homebrew stuff [which was] very
limited, so you couldn’t really play jazz with most of it, in
a conventional sense. [In the 60s] MEV started to play
with a lot of odds and ends instruments and Richard
Teitelbaum started to use a Moog synthesizer when they
became available. So little by little, electronics started to
work their way into jazz at that time.”
7. CONCLUSIONS
The collaborations between jazz and electronic musicians
during the 1960s and 1970s represented an important shift
away from a more musically and socially segregated
musical culture. These efforts, and those of musicians like
George Lewis and Muhal Richard Abrams, whose work
bridges both worlds, have broadened the scope of
electroacoustic music and jazz alike, expanding our
collective aesthetic and historical horizons. There are
clearly numerous examples that blur perceived boundaries
between musical idioms, calling into question the solidity
of these divisions. However, points of contact and
aesthetic consonance remain rare, thus reinforcing the
perception that African-American musical traditions and
electroacoustic music are neither in dialog nor open to
interrelationship.
It would be of value to electroacoustic and computer
music to embrace the historical points of contact that in
truth belong to the legacy and repertoire of the field. It is
equally important to reflect upon and to criticize the
assumptions and self-definitions that have kept these two
traditions apart, not in fact, where artists from both
traditions have fruitfully collaborated, but in the
sometimes parochial practice of two critical theories,
electroacoustic music and jazz, that has reinforced and
maintained this fictitious division.
8. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Many thanks to my students Madonna Pognon and Jeff
Nania for their research about Anthony Braxton, and for
their assistance with the Richard Teitelbaum interview.
Thanks also to Steven Pond for his help and advice.
9. REFERENCES
Unless otherwise noted, all interviews were by the author,
including: Fred Catera (March 1, 2008); Joel Chadabe
(December 8, 2008); Patrick Gleeson (on several
occasions, October 2007 - January 2008 and May - July
2008); Billy Hart (June 17, 2008); Herbie Hancock
(December 19, 2008); Eddie Henderson (March 29, 2008);
Bennie Maupin (January 7, 2008); Gordon Mumma (Dec.
5 and 7, 2008); David Rubinson (January 29, 2008);
Richard Teitelbaum (April 12, 2008); Buster Williams
(February 23 and July 3, 2008). Email consultation with
George Lewis (September 16, 2007 and March 26, 2008).
[1] Abrams, M. R.. “Levels and Degrees of Light,”
Delmark (LP). The composer told me that the
reverberation was removed from a recent CD rerelease, an element that he considers to be an integral
aspect of the composition. 1967.
[2] Abrams, M. R., Lewis, G., and Mitchell, R.
“Streaming,” Pi Recordings, 2006.
[3] Braxton, Anthony. ‘For Alto’, Delmark (LP), 1968.
(CD) 2000.
[4] Currant, A. and Teitelbaum, R. “Musica Elettronica
Viva,” in program notes for the New Music America
Festival, the Knitting Factory, New York City. 1989.
On
the
web:
http://www.alvincurran.com/writings/mev.html
(accessed December 19, 2007).
[5] Degiorgio, K. “Herbie Hancock,” Wax Poetics 29,
June/July, 2008.
[6] Ericson, R. “Study of Noise Takes Art form:
Automation
House
Presents
Ensemble
of
‘Happenings’,” The New York Times, Nov. 22, 1970.
[7] Gluck, R. "Electro-acoustic Music in a Broader
International Context" in Musicworks 94, 2006a, pp.
61-2.
[8] Gluck, R. "Traditional Cultural Resources in Electroacoustic Music" in Living Music Journal, 2006b, pp.
14-18.
[9] Gluck R. “Across, Between and Within Cultures” in
Organized Sound 13:2, Cambridge University Press,
2008
[10] Hancock, H. “Mwandishi” (LP), Warner Brothers,
1971.
[11] Hancock, H. “Crossings” (LP), Warner Brothers,
1972.
[12] Hancock, H. “Sextant” (LP), Columbia Records,
1973.
[13] Lewis, G. “Improvised Music after 1950: Afrological
and Eurological Perspectives.” in Black Music
Research Journal 16: 1,1996, pp. 91-122.
[14] Lewis, G. Too Many Notes: Computers, Complexity
and Culture in Voyager, Leonardo Music Journal 10,
2000, pp. 33-39.
[15] Lewis, G. “Experimental music in black and white:
The AACM in New York, 1970-1985,” in Current
Musicology, 2002, pp. 71-73.
[16] Lewis, G. “The Virtual Discourses of Pamela Z,” in
Journal of the Society for American Music 2007, 1:1,
p. 63.
[17] Lewis, G. A Power Greater Than Itself: The AACM
and American Experimental Music, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 2008.
[18] McLarney, B. “Caught In the Act,” in Down Beat,
May 10, 1972.
[19] Mehegan, J. “Discussion – Herbie Hancock Talks to
John Mehegan”, in Jazz, 3:5, September 1964, pp.
23ff.
[20] Ponds, S. Head Hunters: The Making of Jazz’s First
Platinum Album, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Press, 2008.
[21] Radano, R. New Musical Figurations: Anthony
Braxton’s Cultural Critique. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 72-73.
[22] Siders, H. “Monterey Memo,” Down Beat, November
23, a review of the Monterey Jazz Festival, September
1972, pp. 12-14.
[23] Time Magazine. Best LPs of the year, January 3,
1972.
[24] Welburn, R. “The Black Aesthetic Imperative,” in The
Black Aesthetic, ed. Addison Gayle Jr., New York:
Doubleday, 1971.
[25] Welding, P. Review of “Crossings”, Down Beat,
November 23, 1972.