This essay pursues how HIV/AIDS and digital media transform one another’s historiographies. Working with the archive of activist Kiyoshi Kuromiya (1943–2000), the essay considers the role of AIDS organizing in the history of the Internet, and in establishing recursive relations between media formats. Kuromiya’s early adoption of Internet technology centered the needs of people living with HIV/AIDS, incarcerated people, and people of color to access vital information for community formation and survival. Tracing the unlikely collaboration between Kuromiya and techno-futurist architect R. Buckminster Fuller (1885–1983), which culminated in Kuromiya’s founding of the Critical Path AIDS Project, this essay interrogates the term “adjuvant,” which Fuller borrowed from immunological discourse to describe their co-authorship. Anchored in a critical engagement with the metaphor of the adjuvant — an agent aiding immunological response — this essay elaborates the digital infrastructures underwriting a blueprint for community building, offering a prehistory of digital queer care networks. In conclusion, the essay meditates on the role of curation in theorizing the temporality of AIDS and its ongoing histories.

This article builds on my recent work on "the sharing subject" of contemporary digital media, in which I argue that current online social networking practices, in their emphasis on "sharing" content with networks of contacts, construct and validate the networked subject according to a version of neoliberal individualism. Moreover, the construction of this subject position implicitly recalls the heteronormativity of AIDS panic, through an unlikely rebranding of promiscuity as a desirable and successful mode of interactivity. In particular, this article analyses the recent social media innovation of "frictionless sharing", a term which describes a smoother and wider distribution of content by individual social network users and a less overtly acknowledged but more efficient instrumentalising of users' immaterial labour within a structure of corporate monetisation. If the new rhetoric of "sharing" erases the riskiness of circulation previously encoded in dominant images of virality, notably behaviours associated with HIV, then what is the relationship of the projected potential of "frictionless sharing" to existing normative frames of ethics and morality? In approaching this question, I revisit two significant queer interventions into concepts of community and risk that emerged in the post-AIDS context, including Leo Bersani's path-breaking discussion of promiscuous sex and "self-shattering" and, more extensively, Tim Dean's recent examination of barebacking subculture to which mediations of an idealised frictionlessness are also central.

AIDS and the Distribution of Crises (Duke UP 2020) engages with the AIDS pandemic as a network of varied historical, overlapping, and ongoing crises born of global capitalism and colonial, racialized, gendered, and sexual violence. Drawing on their investments in activism, media, anticolonialism, feminism, and queer and trans of color critiques, the scholars, activists, and artists in this volume outline how the neoliberal logic of “crisis” structures how AIDS is aesthetically, institutionally, and politically reproduced and experienced. Among other topics, the authors examine the writing of the history of AIDS; settler colonial narratives and laws impacting risk in Indigenous communities; the early internet regulation of both content and online AIDS activism; the Black gendered and sexual politics of pleasure, desire, and (in)visibility; and how persistent attention to white men has shaped AIDS as intrinsic to multiple, unremarkable crises among people of color and in the Global South. Foreword by Cindy Patton. Preface and introduction by volume co-editors Jih-Fei Cheng, Alexandra Juhasz, and Nishant Shahani.

In this paper, we explore the relationship between "viral load" as a virological, immunological, epidemiological and social category and how it links the four decades-long global HIV pandemic to the ongoing response to COVID-19. We argue, metaphorically, that the response to SARS-CoV-2 contains 'genetic' material from HIV, which has (as a result of the digital age which reproduces error-filled data at incredible speed) mutated and is being transmitted into the social and political body. Using sexual health and substance use as focal points, we turn to Deleuzoguattarian theoretical insights about the assemblage of desire, affect and material factors that produce epidemics. Contrasting historical and contemporary scenes and issues, we explore the complex assemblage created by viral loads, medical and public health protocols, conceptions of risk, responsibility and fear that connect both pandemics. Finally, we consider the goal of viral eradication and related militaristic metaphors, alongside the increasing convergence of medicine, public health, the law and corporate interests, and contrast this with community responses that engage with what it means to be living and dying in viral times.

COVID–19 has not only resulted in nearly two and a half million deaths globally but it has also spawned a pandemic of misinformation and conspiracies. In this article I examine COVID–19 misinformation and conspiracies in the United States (US). These misinformation and conspiracies have been commonly argued to be anti-science. I argue, although it is important to rebut false information and stop their spread, social scientists need to analyse how such anti-science claims are discursively framed and interpreted. Specifically, I show how the framing of the anti-science conspiracies utilise the credibility of science and scientists. I also explore how the COVID–19 misinformation and conspiracies were given different meaning among different social groups. The article is divided into three sections. In the first section I analyse the discursive emplotment of the Plandemic video that had Dr Judy Mikovits presenting several COVID–19 conspiracy theories and went viral before it was taken do...

(2022). "Beyond 'causes of causes': Health, stigma and the settler colonial urban territory in the Negev/Naqab." Urban Studies (Sage Publications, Ltd.) 59(3): 572-590. This article critically analyses and theoretically conceptualises the links between settler colonialism, planning and health. Based on the case of the Bedouin community in the Negev/Naqab, we argue that the production of settler colonial space has a profound impact on health, and should therefore be referred to as a specific category for analysing health disparities, simultaneously entangling territorial control and biopolitics towards indigenous communities. Furthermore, we suggest that this relationship between space and health constructs stigma that justifies and facilitates-in turn-the ongoing territorial control over the indigenous Bedouin population in Israel. By reviewing existing data on health and planning, especially in relation to infrastructure and access to services, we contribute to the growing literature on the nexus of settler-colonialism/health with urban and regional planning. Importantly, throughout this paper we refer to the Bedouin localities as part of the production of urban territory, illuminating the urban as a multidimensional process of political struggle, including the metropolin informal fringes. (English)

Media virality is a current fetish object in a number of overlapping contexts including marketing, IT design, and academia. The desirability of media "going viral" is confirmed by efforts now undertaken to categorise viral success through a range of typologies and metrics, conceived in order to predict and achieve virality. A recent online ad campaign, staged as a “how to make a viral video”, signals the complexity of the concept of manufactured virality. This article takes as a point of departure a moment of conceptual slippage in the commercial to argue that the current discourse of media virality has paradoxically expelled its own progenitor, the virus. Contrary to Henry Jenkins’s claim that the discourse of virality is “a kind of smallpox-soaked blanket theory of media circulation”, I argue that as transmission has been rebranded as “sharing”, questions of personal and moral responsibility attendant to transmission and infection have been erased in favour of a bland ideology of interactivity. The concept of "virality 2.0" is proposed to account for this double movement: that the discourse of digital virality has relegated viruses to the past while structurally exploiting their dynamic of circulation. Moreover, virality 2.0 reinscribes viral subject positions with normative values drawn from this same cultural past. The argument is supported by three main claims. First, behaviour deemed risky and marginal within a heteronormative discourse of promiscuity has been reappropriated as "sharing" and "leadership". Second, practices of digital media transmission may be as much about systemic functionality as active and engaged participation. And third, post-viral media virality works to stabilise and fetishise the active "sharing subject" in neoliberal and heteronormative terms, at the expense of other practices and pleasures.

This chapter of 'Bodies Out of Rule' (2014) considers John Greyson's 'Zero Patience' -- a 1993 musical satire on the early days of the AIDS epidemic -- in the context of the epidemiological and immunity discourses inherent in neoliberal biopolitics.

This chapter explores digitality as part of young people's everyday lives in the Arctic. It is based on two ethnographic studies situated in the political context of the "digital leap", the governmental and curricular emphasis on digitality in education in Finland. With the more formal "digital leap", informal engagements and attachments with digitality intertwine, in which students' own smartphones play an increasingly significant role. The analyses use the notion of entanglement (Barad) to examine how primary school and upper secondary school students emerge in their situated and specific encounters with smartphones in school. The starting points of things, bodies, affect, time and space open up insights to connectivity between young people's digital activities and global economic networks as well as to the multidirectionality between humans and technologies: while the students access their digital devices, the digitalities also access their users. We suggest that this wilder form of "digital leap" requires reconsidering materiality, affect, and instability of space and time. This chapter explores children's and young people's engagements and attachments with digitality in Nordic school context. School research (e.g. Simola, 2015) has brought out how classroom practice and routine seems to be surprisingly resistant to change to the extent that to an observer's eyes, much of it looks practically unchanged during decades. However, the fact that smartphones increasingly participate in people's lives might be one factor that triggers profound changes even inside school walls. We suggest that the relations between humans and their constant digital companions, their smartphones, cannot be reduced to instrumental pedagogical relations, and that to examine them, one needs to attend to complexity and open-endedness. Thus, in the following, we are not so much focusing on pedagogies, in how smartphones should be used to enhance learning, rather, we are curious about the material, bodily, temporal and spatial dimensions at play in situations in which children and young people and their digital devices entangle in schools and beyond. In talking about young people's engagements with smartphones, we will particularly emphasise two aspects: firstly, the affective nature these engagements, or as we like to think about them following Haraway (2003), companionships. The processes in which phones become young people's