Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
In my articles, tilldate, I have put up the birth of universe by, inrushing the whirling particlesGa in space domain of the universe. But, could not tell the satisfactory cause of, why the Ga particles rushed in. The cause was given that a small disturbance in whirling particles symmetrically distributed in cosmos all over it. But, why that disturbance should occur? Was searching in my brain. That cause is triedto be put up here in this article. Discussion: The nature works on 'cause and effect' principle. But, what is the materialistic cause of birth of materialistic universe. There seems no reason to get the symmetry of the particles lay out in cosmos. So assume multiverses concept. Before the first ever universe, not any universe was in existence. The very basic elementary mass particles Ga, were filled all over the cosmos. At very very remote past. Ga have respective original gravity. Any two Ga particles have attraction in between them due to, their gravity. Therefore, the even distribution must have assembled in tremendously large spheres. much grater than our universe. Very much distant from each other; each one being then for each universe. But this thought is not perfect too. Because each Ga particle will try to construct this like sphere. Therefore, all Ga, will remain distributed homogenious throut the cosmos. Thus, materialistic cause on the basis of its effect, we can not find at all.. Probablity mathematics also fails to find the ultimate cause of the universe. To disturb the perfect symmetry of particles Ga, we have to go beyond materialistic particle's existence. As we construct a machine, and operate and monitor it; in the same way the particles Ga must have used to start the construction of the universe, its monitoring by an Intelligence. It is the original intelligence. It disturb the symmetry of these building blocks of the universe the particles Ga by initiating motion, of a particle. Then, due to its minute gravitational field it pulled with it other Ga near it; and this process continued as a chain reation all over.forming above mentioned universe's related spheres. Then in distribution of infinite such spheres some where imbalance have to happen, such as some shere may have created vacuum inside it. Due to gravity of each sphere, all caould get motion separating from each other, and lessening the gravitational forces on each other. Thus lessoning the gravitational forces on the sphere, where in absolute vacuum is created. Then the inrush of particles in that must have to start giving birth to universe s mentioned by me in my respective article up loaded on aca.edu web and enotes. To NASA and CERN. Then, by following the Physics Rules the world has got Born as per Big Bang theory after the collection of two dimensional particles Ga having no thickness. The Gravity went on playing and the universe was born. Along with gravity, electromagnetism got born from motions due to gravity. Gravity is not electromagnetic field. Gravity is the original eternal field. It causes motions of othe particles due to interaction of gravity between each other. And from different motions due to
ORIGIN OF UNIVERSE(DROOPING-GRIPPING OF ENERGY), 2020
An Improved, Logical Theory which Complies with All Science Laws A Continuous "Dribbling" Little Bang sort of Effect Nearly everyone today seems to consider Physics to be a form of Philosophy, where each person can then feel free to make assumptions, speculations, opinions and judgments, to then be able to arrive at pretty much any conclusion he or she wishes. I was taught most of my Physics at the University of Chicago, and a long time ago. Given the technology of nuclear bombs and a zero-errors attitude, we were taught to never make "assumptions" or "speculations" and to be very cautious about "expressing opinions" or "making judgments". Instead, we were taught to entirely do our thinking based on "known facts" and "strict logic". The very popular Big Bang Theory would not be so popular if some serious logical flaws in it were considered (and somehow explained). The original Big Bang proponents in the 1940s even admitted that they neglected the actual creation of everything, that their theory only begins a moment later, after all of the actual creation had already (somehow) occurred. Those Big Bang people even gave a name to that material that (allegedly) existed before their Big Bang. They called it Ylem. That is when their famous "Big Bang" began, around 10-35 second later, and (they claim that) their actual "Bang" lasted another 10-35 second. They even admitted that it is a serious problem that they cannot explain about how everything had earlier actually come into existence. The Big Bang proponents thereby (allegedly) claim that the entire Universe then had already existed, before their famous Big Bang, as a really, really tiny object, smaller than even a single proton in a single atom. After their Big Bang, they then claim that an even more implausible event took place, which they call Inflation Theory. In another 10-32 second, this Inflationary Theory claims that the tiny speck which was the entire Universe very suddenly expanded (Inflated), in all directions at once by a factor of 10+50 to become the size of the huge existing Universe we know today, all in another 10-32 second. We Physicists are supposed to rely absolutely on logic, and that Inflationary Theory violates many of the scientific Laws that we base all of science on. Separate from needing to explain where the 10+54 kilograms of the material of the entire Universe actually came from before their Big Bang, or how all of that material could have fit inside a truly tiny particle, there is now the requirement for all those trillions of trillions of tons of mass to accelerate up to velocities quadrillions of times faster than the speed of light (which is impossible) for that Inflation expansion to have all occurred in 10-32 second, but then that everything had to then instantly decelerate and essentially stop to become the Universe that we now know. You can do that math to confirm this problem. You have up to 13 billion light years distance to travel, each of 6 trillion miles, where every particle in the Universe allegedly accelerated, traveled, and then decelerated, all in 10-32 second. (If you do the math well, you should get necessary velocities of about 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles/second.) The Big Bang proponents are not able to explain these things, and they don't even try! And we traditional Physicists used to think that the fastest velocity is the speed of light or 186,000 miles/second was the fastest anything could ever go! How gullible are people to accept that such logical silliness makes sense? But few people ever actually "do the math" (as a Theoretical Physicist is supposed to always do) and they simply accept that somebody's smiling face seems to make it all really believable. The Big Bang Theory is immensely popular, but only because virtually no one understands the exotic elliptic curved-space Riemannian Geometry Tensor Calculus on which it is based. Also, because of problems like those acceleration and speed of light issues with their Inflationary Theory, they have somehow convinced all Physicists to choose to be willing to abandon all the known and accepted Laws of science in deference to this very sexy Big Bang claim. All of those universally accepted Laws of science were based on hundreds of years of smart people doing familiar Euclidean [or Plane] Geometry. In Contrast Much better than the very illogical Big Bang Theory, this concept is a solidly logical explanation for the beginning of the Universe. Instead of being based on wild speculation, this is entirely based on actual experiments that many Physicists (including me) have performed, which we Physicists call "Pair Production" experiments. In these unique experiments that Physicist actually creates brand new particles or photons in a laboratory (out of NOTHING). There is no having to abandon all of the Laws of Science and Euclidean logic they were all derived through. This Pair Production experiments approach even provides an actual explanation for the actual creation of all objects and photons, where the Big Bang proponents have to neglect trying to explain such things.
A New Model of Our Universe's Origin, 2024
If A is generated by B, then the following problem is that how B is generated? i.e. What is the cause of B? Then we must assume that B is generated by C. As a result the same problem is that how is C generated? What is the cause of C? Therefore we will go into the infinite regression problem if we don't stop at some point. So the final problem is that if there is a first cause, then what is the cause of the first cause? The same problem applies to our universe. Does our universe have an origin? What generates our universe? Is there a first cause of the being of our universe? If so, what is the cause of the first cause? Our sensible universe apparently contains or is constructed by space, time and materials. We may wonder that is it possible space, time and materials are all generated from the first cause? Are they generated independently or cross-related? These problems give rise to my new model of our universe's origin..
To have the law of universal gravitation is hardly enough to explain the formation of particles. The formation of particles takes place in the Universe, under very dynamic circumstances. Objects rotate, circle around other objects; they melt and collide; all objects put together move in the same direction (the orbit around a larger object; inside a local group of objects; inside clusters and superclusters of galaxies; inside the Universe, multiverse and probably inside two or (at the most) three even larger groups of multiverses. 1Space is filled with radiation (waves) of different kinds and very different intensities (force). This image of space is to be kept constantly in one's mind during the discussion about the formation of particles, because there are no static or "frozen" images or events. In the experiment, which I conducted in 2005., the results showed the gathering of a part of glass and quartz fragments on the surface of water (in the experiment, the gathered group was 5-6 cm in diameter large). The goal of the experiment was to see the behavior of matter after it had passed through a filter, which simulated the friction of matter. The filter was a transparent pressure hose, a few meters long, filled with quartz sand (and the other with grained glass). To make more intensive friction force, I used a compressor and a pressurized water machine. In the exit part of the equipment I used water (as a filter of outgoing matter particles) in an open container. The conclusion was that matter, under pressure, tends to gather and segregates itself on the water surface – even though it should, generally, sink (with a mild rotation, which is not going to be discussed now). There is only one force in space, which is able to create the friction of particles – and it is radiation (waves). Since the muon discovery (µ), which science fails to acknowledge even to this day, it has been known that in the collision of waves and particles (matter) a disintegration2 of proton can occur, which is later confirmed in accelerators or in particle collisions. 3 Waves are at the same time a very weak force when we discuss the formation of particles (here, the particles of hydrogen, helium, etc., are discussed). A chemical composition of the visible matter in the Universe can testify for it – on average, different sources claim there is about 89% of hydrogen (H) and 11% of helium (He) and all other elements. Chemical compositions of nebulae and clouds have the same ratio.
2000
Results on particle creation in the early Friedmann Universe, showing the connection of appearance of particles in it with the geometrical property of causal disconnectedness are discussed, and the possibility of entropy creation is analysed. Origination of space-time itself due to Boole-ization of some non-Boolean lattice of properties of the quantum system leading to open space where all potentialities of
IJSR, 2020
Abstract: Till now, There are found four fundamental forces in the Nature/universe. They are, (1) Gravity, (2) The Weak Force, (3) Electromagnetism and (4) The Strong Force. But, since 2000, thinking on the most original, eternal, fundamental particles, it is found by the author through meditation of octo-microscopic nature, (1) self-conscious, (2) Intellect, (3) Mind, (4) Space, and Principle Properties of each of the following, (5) Air, (6) Light, (7) Water, (8) Earth; from the Modern Science and the Hindu Phylosophy particularly, ShriMadBhagWadGeeta. that, there must be some fundamental ever existing original particles as building blocks of the Nature, the Universe. Yethakashashthito nityam Vayuh… means as there is air always attached to space, all objects and events in the universe are attached to the space. Space is also self conscious as per the Geeta. The Dark Energy matter in astronomy corresponds to the Vayuh in Geeta. Something moving is energy, Dark photons, always in motion in space is energy and that's the Dark Energy in space. The particles of the Dark Energy are named 'Dark Photons' by the author. These particles represent all above fundamental four forces of the nature and also the properties of mass, electricity and magnetism, And a mesh of neutral field lines which, assume any field according to respective particles coming into existence in space-Domains. It is Idol Ganapati who presented all these Principles, First ever known and worshipped in Hindu-Aryan culture. All each of the Bosons like Higgs Particle are constituted from combining the fundamental particles into respective bunches.
Psychiatric Genetics, 2019
Wolters Kluwer, 2024
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2021
Presses universitaires de Caen eBooks, 2020
Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacy, 2024
2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT), 2016
International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2003
Frontiers in immunology, 2018
Symmetry, 2021
Chemical Senses, 2011