Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5908-5945; doi:10.3390/ijms12095908
OPEN ACCESS
International Journal of
Molecular Sciences
ISSN 1422-0067
www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Review
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Present and
Future Prospective
Giuseppe Vasapollo *, Roberta Del Sole, Lucia Mergola, Maria Rosaria Lazzoi, Anna Scardino,
Sonia Scorrano and Giuseppe Mele
Department of Engineering of Innovation, University of Salento, via per Arnesano km 1, Lecce 73100,
Italy; E-Mails: roberta.delsole@unisalento.it (R.D.S.); lucia.mergola@unisalento.it (L.M.);
mariarosaria.lazzoi@unisalento.it (M.R.L.); anna.scardino@unisalento.it (A.S.);
sonia.scorrano@unisalento.it (S.S.); giuseppe.mele@unisalento.it (G.M.)
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: giuseppe.vasapollo@unisalento.it;
Tel.: +39-0832-297-252; Fax: +39-0832-297-272.
Received: 7 June 2011; in revised form: 3 August 2011 / Accepted: 17 August 2011 /
Published: 14 September 2011
Abstract: Molecular Imprinting Technology (MIT) is a technique to design artificial
receptors with a predetermined selectivity and specificity for a given analyte, which can be
used as ideal materials in various application fields. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers
(MIPs), the polymeric matrices obtained using the imprinting technology, are robust
molecular recognition elements able to mimic natural recognition entities, such as
antibodies and biological receptors, useful to separate and analyze complicated samples
such as biological fluids and environmental samples. The scope of this review is to provide
a general overview on MIPs field discussing first general aspects in MIP preparation and
then dealing with various application aspects. This review aims to outline the molecularly
imprinted process and present a summary of principal application fields of molecularly
imprinted polymers, focusing on chemical sensing, separation science, drug delivery and
catalysis. Some significant aspects about preparation and application of the molecular
imprinting polymers with examples taken from the recent literature will be discussed.
Theoretical and experimental parameters for MIPs design in terms of the interaction
between template and polymer functionalities will be considered and synthesis methods for
the improvement of MIP recognition properties will also be presented.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5909
Keywords: molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs); molecular imprinting technology
(MIT); molecular recognition; solid phase extraction; sensors; HPLC; drug delivery;
catalysis; artificial receptors
1. Introduction
Molecular Imprinting Technology (MIT) is today a viable synthetic approach to design robust
molecular recognition materials able to mimic natural recognition entities, such as antibodies and
biological receptors [1–9].
The design of synthetic materials, which are able to mimic the recognition processes found in nature,
has become an important and active area of research making in recent years molecular imprinting one
of the strategies followed to create materials with recognition ability comparable to the natural systems.
MIT is considered a versatile and promising technique which is able to recognize both biological
and chemical molecules including amino acids and proteins [10–12], nucleotide derivatives [13],
pollutants [14,15], drugs and food [16,17]. Further, application areas include: separation sciences and
purification [14,18–23], chemical sensors [24], catalysis [25], drug delivery [26], biological antibodies
and receptors system [10,27,28].
MIT is based on the formation of a complex between an analyte (template) and a functional
monomer. In the presence of a large excess of a cross-linking agent, a three-dimensional polymer
network [29] is formed. After polymerization process, the template is removed from the polymer
leaving specific recognition sites complementary in shape, size and chemical functionality to the
template molecule (Figure 1). Usually, intermolecular interactions like hydrogen bonds, dipole–dipole
and ionic interactions between the template molecule and functional groups present in the polymer
matrix drive the molecular recognition phenomena. Thus, the resultant polymer recognizes and binds
selectively only the template molecules.
Figure 1. Scheme of molecular imprinting.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5910
The main advantages of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are their high selectivity and
affinity for the target molecule used in the imprinting procedure. Imprinted polymers compared to
biological systems such as proteins and nucleic acids, have higher physical robustness, strength,
resistance to elevated temperature and pressure and inertness towards acids, bases, metal ions and
organic solvents. In addition, they are also less expensive to be synthesized and the storage life of the
polymers can be very high, keeping their recognition capacity also for several years at room temperature.
The scope of this review is to provide a general overview on MIPs field, some significant aspects
about preparation and application of the molecular imprinting polymers with examples taken from the
recent literature will be outlined. The discussion will evaluate some theoretical and experimental
parameters for MIPs design in terms of the interaction between template and polymer functionalities,
and synthesis methods for the improvement of MIP recognition properties. In the present review
various MIPs applications will also be considered focusing on more recent separation techniques,
sensors and biosensors, catalysis and drug delivery.
2. Molecular Imprinting Process
As reported above, molecular imprinting is a technique to synthesize highly cross-linked polymers
capable of selective molecular recognition. The principle is summarized in Figure 1: polymerization of
a monomer occurs in the presence of the target molecule (template) which is incorporate in the
polymer matrix. The process starts with dissolution of template, functional monomer, cross-linking
agent and initiator in a porogenic solvent. Functional monomers are chosen to interact with the
template molecule since the formation of a stable template-monomer complex is fundamental for the
success of molecular recognition. Monomers are positioned spatially around the template and the
position is fixed by copolymerization with cross-linking monomers. The polymer obtained is a
macroporous matrix possessing microcavities with a three-dimensional structure complementary to
that of the template. Thus, the removal of the template molecules from the polymer, by washing with
solvent, leaves binding sites that are complementary in shape to the template. Consequently, the
resultant polymer recognizes and binds selectively the template molecules. The binding sites show
different characteristics, depending on the interactions established during the polymerization.
Traditionally, molecular imprinting is classified according to the nature of the interactions between
monomer and template during the polymerization.
For their insoluble nature, MIPs are notoriously difficult to characterize. However, some
analytical techniques can be utilized for their chemical and morphological characterization, including
solid-state NMR techniques [30], elemental micro-analysis and Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
(FT-IR) [31] which can be applied to obtain chemical information on the composition of the polymer.
CP-MAS (cross polarization magic angle spinning) NMR spectra for MIP characterization have been
reported in a few works even if solid state NMR is a useful method to determine chemical composition
of insoluble polymers. For instance, Annamanna and co-workers [30] very recently confirmed the
incorporation of crosslinking agent EGDMA and functional monomer 4-vynilpyridine in the polymer
backbone of the prepared MIP by 13C CP-MAS-NMR. More often FT-IR studies have been used for
MIPs characterization through the evaluation of functional groups incorporation in the polymer and
through the comparison between polymer and functional monomer spectra to follow the decreasing or
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5911
disappearance of some signals, such as carbon double bond stretching of a vinyl functional monomer,
as a result of polymerization of the polymerizable group of the monomer [31].
Morphological characteristics of MIPs can be properly investigated by microscopy techniques, such
as light microscopy to verify the natural integrity of polymer beads and scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) to image polymer macro-pores [31,32]. Moreover, nitrogen sorption porosimetry by using
BET (Brunauer, Emmett and Teller) analysis is the main technique used to determine specific surface
area, specific pore volume, pore size distribution and average pore diameter values of the polymer
particles while mercury intrusion porosimetry is sometimes used and is more suitable for larger
pores characterization.
However, a very important level of characterization for MIPs concerns the molecular recognition
behavior, such as the binding capacity, and one of the best methods for evaluating binding capacity
and selectivity is the batch rebinding. MIPs can also be used directly as chromatographic stationary
phases which generally provide a quicker and easier method for analyzing the binding properties of
MIPs [22,32,33]. Scatchard analysis is a common model to evaluate the binding behavior of MIPs in
batch rebinding experiments. Typically non-covalent binding between template and functional
monomer gives a Scatchard plot with two straight lines indicating heterogenous affinities of the
binding sites in the polymer that are calculated with two association constants corresponding to the
high and low-affinity binding sites [34]. On the other hand, Freundlich and Langmuir-Freundlich (LF)
isotherms represent most suitable chromatography theoretical models for characterizing and
understanding chromatographic features of MIPs columns. These methods, which are also called
continuous heterogeneous binding models, can well characterize MIPs by calculating total number of
binding sites, heterogeneity index and mean binding affinity. Among them, the LF isotherm is the most
commonly model used for characterizing MIPs as HPLC stationary phases prepared by either covalent
or non-covalent imprinting [33].
An even better MIP evaluation than imprinting factor seems to be the selectivity for a different
molecule, but structurally related to the template, because often the presence of the template during
polymerization synthesis causes general changes in the morphology of the polymer, such as porosity
and surface area, which are confirmed from binding differences compared with the polymer control
that may not be exclusively due to the presence of imprinted sites. On the other hand, the imprinting
factor must be considered along with selectivity results since a better or less good retention of a certain
compound over another one may just be due to their particular physicochemical properties rather than
to specific imprinted sites.
2.1. Prepolymerization Studies
Good interactions between monomer and template represent a preliminary essential condition to
obtain MIP networks with potential recognition sites. Today there are two main strategies employed
for MIP technology depending on the nature of prepolymerization interactions between template
and monomer:
self-assembling approach [35], similar to the biological recognition systems, that uses
non-covalent forces, such as hydrogen bonds, Van der Waals forces, ion or hydrophobic
interaction and metal-coordinations;
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5912
preorganized approach [2], which uses covalent reversible bonds giving a rather homogeneous
population of binding sites and reducing the non-specific sites. However, to remove the
template from the polymer matrix, it is necessary to cleave the covalent bounds.
Amongst these, self-assembling is still the most frequently adopted approach for the preparation of
MIPs due to the simplicity of complex formation and dissociation and the flexibility in terms of
available functional monomers that can interact with almost any kind of templates. On the other side,
the related MIPs have lower binding affinity than those prepared using covalent methods. Hwang and
Lee [36] prepared, by using a bulk technique, cholesterol-imprinted polymers either in a covalent and a
non-covalent approach and they compared MIPs performances as stationary phases for HPLC
columns. They found less peaks broadening, higher adsorption capacity and about fivefold higher
chromatographic efficiency for the covalently imprinted polymer in comparison with non-covalently
imprinted polymers.
Various works reported in the literature demonstrated that prepolymerization studies on
self-assembling systems can be useful for the selection of suitable functional monomers and solvents
for specific template molecules. The formation of functional monomer-template complexes has been
investigated by spectroscopic and theoretical approaches, that includes UV-Vis and NMR spectroscopies
and theoretical models as well [37–43].
Job’s method, titration curves and binding isotherms are currently used to determine the nature of
the interactions, the coordination number of the complex monomer-template and the association
constant by using spectroscopy techniques. For example, the formation of the complex between
nitrofurantoin with 2,6-bis(methaacrylamido) pyridine (BMP) was studied by NMR spectroscopy
revealing a hydrogen bonding interaction between the imide moiety of nitrofurantoin with the protons of
the pyridine moiety of BMP and allowing also the calculation of the association constant. Similar studies
were also reported between carboxyphenyl aminohydantoin (CPAH) and 2,6-bis(methacrylamido)
pyridine (BMP). Titration curves were performed and the binding constant was calculated using
nonlinear curve fitting for a 1:1 complexation model and the complex stoichiometry was independently
confirmed by a Job plot method [44].
Longo et al. in 2006 [45] evaluated the binding affinity and selectivity of a new phthalocyanine,
as potential monomer towards nucleoside derivatives, by using UV-vis titration experiments.
The experiment allowed the calculation of the association constant Ka, determined by the modified
Benesi-Hildebrand equation, of a zinc phthalocyanine with tri-O-acetyladenosine (TOAA). The
calculated value was 1.35 × 104 M which confirms potential use of the zinc phthalocyanine as
functional monomer in the formation of molecularly imprinted polymers for nucleoside receptors.
Successively, Longo et al. [27,34] prepared selective MIPs having the phthalocyanine-based
recognition centre as receptors for tri-O-acetyladenosine (TOAA) or for RNA nucleoside (Figure 2).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5913
Figure 2. Schematic representation of molecular imprinting of tri-O-acetyladenosine
(TOAA) using Zn(II) tetra(4’-methacryloyloxyphenoxy)phthalocyanine 1 and methacrylic
acid (Adapted from [27]).
AcO
N
H
OAc
AcO
AcO
O
N
R
TOAA
N
R
N
N
N
Zn
N
N
H
R
N
H
N
H
N
R
HO
N
N
O
N
H
O
Molecular
imprinting
N
N
N
Zn
N
N
OAc
N
N
OAc
N
O
TOAA-modeled
cavity
R
O
MAA
N
N
N
N
Polymer matrix
1
R=
R
O
O
O
In 2009 Del Sole et al. [40] reported the studies of prepolymerization interactions between
nicotinamide and methacrylic acid in chloroform and acetonitrile by using 1H-NMR spectroscopy.
The results of this work suggested a possible interaction between nicotinamide and methacrylic acid
mainly based on hydrogen-bonding formation between amide protons of template and methacrylic
acid. Moreover, computational Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies on the complex (Figure 3)
and solvent allowed a better understanding of hydrogen-bonding interactions.
Figure 3. The most stable prepolymerization complex structures for a ratio of 1:2, 1:3 and
1:4 between nicotinamide and methacrylic acid (Adapted from [40]).
Wei et al. [38] explored the potential use of Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations for selecting
the most suitable monomers for 17β-estradiol which was used as model template. Hydrogen-bonding
strength was evaluated and the results agreed with previously reported results on batch rebinding
experiments. Moreover, experimental 1H NMR titration studies confirmed the theoretical results.
In another work [41], a computational screening of 18 monomers, commonly used, that are able to
interact with cholic acid (the template) was used to rapidly select the most suitable monomers for
synthesizing cholate-imprinted and non-imprinted polymer networks. However, since the modeling is
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5914
performed using some approximations, differences can occur between modeling and experimental
results, especially when polymerization and rebinding steps are done in different liquids.
Pietrzyk [42], using DFT energy optimization calculations, visualized the most stable
MIP-melamine complex as triprotonated melamine template with three prepolymerized
bis(2,2'-bithienyl)-benzo-[18-crown-6]methane monomers.
Finally, in recent works it was demonstrated that all components (template, functional monomer,
solvent, initiator, cross-linker) in a prepolymerization mixture can affect template complexation [39,43].
For instance, molecular dynamics simulations of bupivacaine template in a typical prepolymerization
system were performed and the template-methacrylic acid complexation, the role of chloroform and
ethylene dimethacrylate in presence of the initiator, were evaluated in conjunction with 1H NMR
spectroscopy experiments, in order to argue the heterogeneity observed in MIPs [39].
2.2. Optimization of MIPs Synthesis
In the synthesis of MIPs, many parameters have to be assessed since they can influence
morphology, properties and performance of the polymers. Even if many authors have tried to
investigate and understand the role of different parameters in MIPs preparation, a rational
comprehension of all of them is still quite difficult to achieve and represents a critical point in MIP
field; however, some remarks in MIPs synthesis can be highlighted [8].
Today, the most common method used to obtain MIPs is the free radical polymerization. Generally,
the synthesis procedure is performed under mild reaction conditions (e.g., temperature lower than
80 °C and atmospheric pressure) in bulk or in solution, and it is tolerant for a wide range of functional
groups and template structures. The polymerization reaction is normally very rapid; it is started by an
azo-initiator, commonly azo N-N’-bis isobutyronitrile (AIBN) and by thermal or photochemical
initiation. Data in literature demonstrate that photo-initiated polymerization at low temperature
decreases the kinetic energy of the prepolymerization complex increasing its stability and allowing
greater binding capacity and specificity than thermal initiated polymerization which requires
temperatures higher than 40 °C [16,44,46]. Recently Athikomrattanakul et al. [44] attempted to
prepare MIPs for nitrofurantoin recognition by thermal initiation, but was unsuccessful. The author,
according to the assumption of other papers [16,46], used a photo initiation at low temperature (4 °C)
with Irgacure 127 as initiator to synthesize MIPs by using a non-covalent approach. Thus, two
different polymers were obtained with carboxyphenyl aminohydantoin as template and
DMSO/acetonitrile (67/33) as the porogen and for these polymers interesting imprinting factors for
carboxyphenyl aminohydantoin (3.38 and 3.53) and also for nitrofurantoin (2.27 and 2.49)
were calculated.
In the synthesis of MIPs, the choice of the chemical reagents is of primary importance in order to
obtain efficient functional MIPs. A wide range of template molecules such as drugs, amino acids,
carbohydrates, proteins, nucleotide bases, hormones, pesticides and co-enzymes have been successfully
used [10–17].
The choice of monomer is very important in order to create highly specific cavities designed for the
template molecule. Typical functional monomers (Figure 4) are carboxylic acids (acrylic acid,
methacrylic acid, vinylbenzoic acid), sulphonic acids (2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulphonic acid),
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5915
heteroaromatic bases (vinylpyridine, vinylimidazole). In the non-covalent approach they are normally
used in excess compared to the template to favor the formation of template-monomer assemblies. In
fact, association between the monomer and the template is governed by an equilibrium, and the
functional monomers normally have to be added in excess, relative to the number of moles of the
template to favor the formation of the complex, with template:functional monomer ratios typically of
1:4. Consequently, this led to a number of different configurations of the template-functional monomer
complex, which produced a heterogeneous binding site distribution in the final MIP, with
a range of affinity constants. The extensive use of methacrylic acid (MAA) is due to its capability to
act both as hydrogen bond and proton donor and as hydrogen bond acceptor. Moreover, more strong
functional monomers were developed via metal coordination interactions to bind specific amino acid
sequences [47]. New functional monomers, based on polymerizable amidines and ureas, have been
developed for stoichiometrically imprinted polymeric receptor of -lactam antibiotics, reducing
non-specific adsorption [48]. The best monomers for synthesizing imprinted materials are selected
considering strength and nature of template-monomer interactions as discussed in the
previous paragraph.
Figure 4. Structure of the most common monomers used for molecular imprinting.
In imprinted polymers synthesis, the cross-linker also fulfils important functions. The cross-linker is
important in controlling the morphology of the polymer matrix, serves to stabilize the imprinted
binding sites and imparts mechanical stability to the polymer matrix in order to retain its molecular
recognition capability [49]. Different cross-linkers have been used (Figure 5). High cross-link ratios
are generally used in order to access permanently porous (macroporous) materials with adequate
mechanical stability. Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) and trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate
(TRIM) are the most commonly employed. Some authors found that cross-linker has a major impact
on the physical characteristics of the polymers and much less effect on the specific interactions
between the template and functional monomers [37,50,51]. TRIM as cross-linker gives polymers with
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5916
more rigidity, structure order and effective binding sites than EGDMA. In the case of polymerization
obtained by precipitation method, it has been seen that optimizing the amount of cross-linker and
reducing the concentration of the template, the polymer binding properties are improved and the level
of non-specific interactions is decreased [52]. In another study it has been observed that the type of
cross-linker strongly influences the final size and yield of MIP nanoparticles [53]. In fact, when
divinylbenzene was used as the cross-linker, polydisperse MIP particles were obtained in low yield,
whereas, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TRIM) led to uniform nanoparticles in high yield (90%).
Figure 5. Structure of the most common cross-linkers used for molecular imprinting.
Moreover, nature and volume of the solvent play also an important role in the molecular imprinting
process. The most common solvents used for MIPs synthesis are toluene, chloroform, dichlorometane
or acetonitrile. The solvent serves to bring all the components (monomer, template, initiator,
cross-linker) into one phase in the polymerization and it is responsible for creating the pores in
macroporous polymers. The solvent should produce large pores to assure good flow through properties
of the resultant MIP and increasing the volume of the solvents, the pore volume of the polymer
enlarges. For this reason it is quite common to refer to the solvent as the “porogen”. The porogen in a
non-covalent imprinting polymerization should also be chosen considering its role in promoting
template-functional monomer complex formation: less polar solvents such as chloroform or toluene
increase the complex formation facilitating polar non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonds;
more polar solvents tend to dissociate the non-covalent interactions in the prepolymer complex,
especially protic solvents that afford a high degree of disruption of the hydrogen bonds. However in
some papers efficient MIPs have been prepared in rather polar solvents (e.g., acetonitrile/water or
methanol/water) since strong template-monomer interactions have been observed. For instance, a
water-compatible imprinted polymer with strong affinity for a polar 1-methyladenosine template has
been prepared in acetonitrile/water 4/1 and successfully used as solid phase extraction (SPE) sorbent
for the analyte extraction from spiked human urine samples [54].
Usually apolar, non-protic solvents, such as toluene or chloroform, are preferred in MIPs synthesis
whereas, if hydrophobic forces are involved in the complexation process, water or other protic solvents
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5917
could be selected as well. Moreover, it was observed that, after the polymerization, the rebinding
performance is optimized when carried out in the same solvent used for the imprinting, suggesting
that the optimum rebinding conditions require the same or very similar solvation conditions used for
the polymerization.
2.3. MIPs Physical Forms and Methods
MIPs can be prepared in a variety of physical forms, using different method, depending on their
final application [9,20]. The conventional approach is to synthesize MIPs in bulk, then grind the
resulting polymer and successively sieve the particles into the desired size ranges according to the
specific application. This method is the most popular since it is simple; nevertheless, crushing,
grinding and sieving to obtain the appropriate particle sizes is tedious and time-consuming and often
produces particles that are irregular in size and shape. In addition, some interaction sites are destroyed
during grinding, reducing the MIP loading capacity and, since only a portion of the original polymer is
used, this method suffers from high consumption of the template molecules. Most imprinting
publications are still based on use of this method although the scarce control of the MIP physical form
and difficulties in scaling up MIP production are important drawbacks. In order to overcome these
problems, alternative methods to prepare novel MIP formats, such as MIP beads, membranes, in situ
prepared monoliths, surface imprinting, molecularly imprinted monolayers have been developed in
recent years [9].
Regular beads can instead be obtained using precipitation polymerization method. This technique
allows the formation of imprinted beads with the same reaction mixture used in the bulk method
except for the presence of a higher amount of porogen. Polymer chains will continue to grow,
precipitating only when become large enough to be insoluble in the reaction mixture. Then the
polymer beads are easily recovered by washing and centrifugation operations. This technique is easy,
less time consuming than bulk polymerization and provides regular beads in good yields. The particles
diameters decrease, increasing the porogen volume probably due to the formation of less oligomers
and nuclei under diluted conditions and with an increase of flow ability of the polymer, thus less
monomers and cross-linkers diffuse to the surface and polymerize into the small particles. In a recent
work [53], a feasible defined control of MIP size from nanoparticles to microbeads that can be utilized
in different applications by changing the reaction conditions was obtained. The change of particle size,
while maintaining excellent recognition property, was achieved by varying the ratio of two different
cross-linking monomers (DVB and TRIM) in similar precipitation polymerization conditions. Polymers
in the range of 130 nm to 2.4 μm covering all pore sizes typically obtained with precipitation technique
were prepared. Mosbach and Mayes [55] prepared spherical beads in liquid perfluorocarbon by
suspension imprinting polymerization in the presence of a stabilizer and a surfactant. More recently
Zourob et al. [56], using a polycarbonate-based spiral microflow reactor, demonstrated that in mineral
oil, which is less expensive than perfluorocarbon, it is not necessary to add any stabilizer or surfactant
to produce monodisperse MIP beads.
In recent years molecularly imprinted polymer membranes have attracted significant interest.
Porous free-standing molecularly imprinted polymer membranes were synthesized by the method of
in situ polymerization using the principle of synthesis of interpenetrating polymer networks and tested
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5918
in solid-phase extraction of triazine herbicides from aqueous solutions. Addition of oligourethane
acrylate provided formation of the highly cross-linked MIP in the form of a free-standing 60 µm thick
flexible membrane [57]. However, for separation purposes low membrane permeability was still the
main obstacle for their application in separation processing. Yang et al. [58] prepared molecularly
imprinted nanotubes supported by a porous alumina membrane. The imprinted nanotubes could be
used directly for the separation of biomolecules, without the alumina support being removed.
Monolithic MIPs have also been prepared by a simple, one-step, in situ free-radical polymerization
process directly within the confines of a chromatographic column without the need of grinding, sieving
and column packing.
Surface grafting of MIP layers onto preformed beads has also been proposed as a technique
to obtain chromatography-grade imprinted polymers. In this method, thin imprinted layers have
been used as coatings on chromatography-grade porous silica or spherical polymers using several
techniques to retain the radical polymerization at the surface of the beads.
Molecularly imprinted monolayers have also been prepared for sensor applications. Lahav et al.
produced recognition sites for a naphthacenequinone derivative in a thiol monolayer on gold electrodes
through a photochemical imprinting method [59]. The group of Piletsky and Turner developed a MIP
sensor for domoic acid (DA) based on amino-substituted methacrylate crosslinked with ethylene glycol
dimethacrylate with a direct photografting of their polymer onto a sensitive gold layer suitable for
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) detection [60].
2.4. Critical Aspects
Molecular imprinting process presents various advantages, as described above, but some drawbacks
must also be considered.
Design of a new MIP system suitable for a specific template molecule often requires a lot of
time and work for synthesis, washing and testing. Generally many attempts need to be made,
changing various experimental parameters, before finding the optimum conditions. Combinatorial
chemistry has been recently adopted in order to accelerate the optimization of MIPs to attain the
desired performance [61–63]. Combinatorial approach also allows finding the best MIP composition
through the simultaneous synthesis and evaluation of tens or hundreds of imprinted polymers prepared
on a small scale (mini-MIPs). Sellergren [63] introduced a high-throughput synthesis and screening
(HTS) system in a 96-well plate format that allows rapid optimization and fine tuning of the molecular
recognition properties of MIPs library by the use of filter plates for rapid template removal and a
multifunctional plate reader for a parallel analysis of the supernatant fractions. In another example,
MIP nanoparticles for peptide melittin recognition were obtained using a small combinatorial library of
different functional monomers [64]. Only MIPs prepared with proper amounts of N-tert-butylacrylamide
and acrylic acid showed high affinity for the peptide.
Another important critical point is the design of water-compatible MIPs. For various applications
especially in clinical and environmental fields (for instance many biomolecules are insoluble or
lose their activities in organic solvents) the imprinting capability of MIPs in water solutions is
required. Unfortunately water molecules will compete with the template making weaker or destroying
non-covalent interactions (electrostatic, hydrogen and van der Waals bonds) between template
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5919
and functional monomer. In spite of this, some progress has been made in the development of
water-compatible MIPs. Hydrophobic, ionic or metal co-ordination interactions are proving to be very
promising to enhance template and functional monomer association in water. Polymerizable-cyclodestrines
were used as the hydrophobic part able to control electrostatic interactions between template and
monomer from water interferences [65] or mineral oil was added after polymerization to create a
hydrophobic shield ables to protect functional groups responsible for molecular recognition [66].
Moreover Piletska et al. conducted fundamental research on the physicochemical characterization of a
set of imprinted and blank polymers in order to investigate why MIPs, capable of ion pairing,
sometimes work in water and sometimes fail. They found that acidic monomers are more effective
than basic monomers in creating ionic interactions with the template; secondly, ionic interactions
character in MIP can be improved by using strong acidic monomers such as trifluoromethylacrylic acid
and, finally, to enhance inclusion of ionized monomers into the polymer, the solvent should have high
hydrophobicity [67]. A few studies of imprinting in a mixture of water-containing solvents
(methanol/water) such as a porogen have been reported. This choice is done either for solubility
reasons, when the template is a polar compound and is not very soluble in solvents, or when the use of
a polar solvent favors interactions of the template with the monomers [54,68]. Other papers reported
water-compatible MIPs, prepared by introducing hydrophilic properties to the polymer in order to
reduce non-specific hydrophobic interactions by using polar porogens [68], hydrophilic comonomers
or cross-linkers [69] and/or monomers capable of stoichiometrically interacting with the template
functionalities [70].
3. MIPs’ Applications
The peculiar properties of MIPs have made them a highly interesting tool for different application
areas, including separation sciences and purification, sensors and biosensors, catalysis and drug delivery.
Molecular imprinting chromatography is one of the most extensively studied application areas
of MIPs, which are highly suitable for chromatographic separation, allowing the preparation of
tailor-made supports with predetermined selectivity. The increasing demand for optically pure
compounds makes MIPs for chiral separations another important application especially to obtain the
racemic resolution of drugs [22,71]. MIPs have also emerged as new selective sorbents for solid phase
extraction (SPE) procedures, allowing not only the preconcentration and cleaning of samples but also
the selective extraction of target analytes from complex matrices.
Recently, several studies have demonstrated that MIPs can serve also as artificial binding mimics of
natural antibodies and can be used as recognition elements in immunoassay-type analyses. To date
MIPs have been successfully used with different types of transducers and several methods have been
used to achieve a close integration of the transduction platform with the polymer [24].
Considerable investigations have also been made on the use of MIPs as active materials for
catalyzing some reactions. MIPs with catalytic properties can be considered mimics of natural
enzymes and applied in enzyme-like catalysis [25,72].
Finally, an area which poses the greatest challenge for MIPs is that of therapeutics and medical
therapy. The capability of the MIPs to bind bioactive molecules in specific conditions makes MIT a
huge potential for creating suitable dosage forms.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5920
In the next four paragraphs, present and future prospectives of the most important applications will
be discussed.
3.1. MIPs in Separation Techniques
Molecularly Imprinted Chromatography is one of the most traditional applications of molecularly
imprinted polymers [20,33,73] especially for Liquid Chromatography (LC) [74,75] with MIPs usually
synthesized by bulk polymerization, ground and sieved mechanically and subsequently packed in a
chromatographic column [22]. However, the mechanical processing leads to irregular particles with
relatively broad size distribution, resulting in packing of irreproducible quality. For this reason
monolithic molecular imprinting columns have been recently prepared directly inside stainless steel
columns or capillary columns [76,77]. The monolithic MIPs have fewer nonselective sites than the
conventional bulk MIPs particles, even if the polar porogen used for MIPs synthesis can give poorer
enantiomeric separation. Many efforts to decrease heterogeneous size distribution have been made also
by preparing spherical and monodispersed beads as HPLC stationary phases. Experimental data
suggest that not always uniform MIPs particle sizes allow better chromatographic performances. For
instance, precipitation polymerization was used to prepare spherical beads but with a total pore volume
still lower compared to irregular particles obtained by bulk polymerization and it has been seen that
the particles porosity of the beads strongly influences the chromatographic performance of these
systems [78]. In fact the calculated pores volume of 0.38 mL/g obtained for beads was lower in
comparison to 0.64 mL/g observed for irregular shaped MIPs prepared with similar reagents. LC has
been extensively used to evaluate the recognition properties of MIPs since generally it provides
a quicker and easier method for analyzing binding polymer performances. Commonly, the retention
behavior (k) of the MIP column, is compared with a reference column packed with the Non-Imprinted
Polymer (NIP), to evaluate the imprinting effect which is often expressed by the Imprinting Factor (If)
calculated as the ratio between the MIP column and the NIP column (kMIP/kNIP). The MIP sorbents,
due to selective interactions exhibited, retain the analyte more strongly than the NIP materials [23].
MIPs were frequently used as Chiral Stationary Phases (MIP-CSPs) in High Performance Liquid
Chromatography (HPLC) to obtain enantiomeric resolutions of racemic solutions of different
compounds [19], such as amino acid derivatives [74,79–83] and drugs [71,84,85]. The first studies
were made by Mosbach group that realized an MIP sorbent used as stationary phase in LC, to separate
amino acid derivatives [79]. Recently, Sellergren and co-workers prepared an acrylic polymer by
non-covalent imprinting procedure for selective enantioseparation of D or L-Phenylalanine ethyl
esters to evaluate the enantio and substrate-selectivity for some amino acid derivates [86]. Yin and
co-workers [77] reported studies on the enantioseparation of L-nateglinide by using MIP-CSPs
prepared with both bulk and monolithic polymerization process in the same chromatographic conditions.
The recognition performances of the monolithic molecular imprinting column showed better performance
than the column packed with the polymer obtained by bulk polymerization and this is probably due to
the reduction of the number of aspecific binding sites in the monolithic column [87]. However,
a limiting factor of monolithic MIP formats is due to the use of porogenic polar solvents required
to achieve pore structures of sufficient permeability. The solvent polarity can compete with the
template-monomer interactions reducing the affinity of the polymer for the template.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5921
It is worth noting that one of the main drawbacks observed in MIPs for HPLC columns, that
limit its commercial application, is the excessive peak broadening and tailing. In fact, they are often
found in chromatograms for templates when MIP is used as sorbent and they are attributed to the
heterogeneity of the binding sites in the MIPs [33]. More specifically peak broadening and tailing are
both thermodynamic and kinetic characteristics. This phenomenon depends on the association constant
and sample load, increasing for high values of association constant. Recent efforts to improve
chromatographic efficiency have been done and include the replacement of non-covalent imprinting with
the covalent one and the use of several strategies for obtaining uniformly sized spherical microspheres.
MIPs have also been used as media for Capillary Electrochromatography (CEC). CEC is a hybrid
separation technique that combines the stationary phase of LC with the electrosmotically driven
mobile-phase transport of electrophoresis. MIP-based micro-columns for CEC are recently realized for
separation of several compounds [73,88,89].
Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) is another important area of application of MIPs in analytical
chemistry [21,23,90–93]. MIP for Solid-phase extraction (MISPE) has been applied both in on-line
and off-line procedures. MIPs particles, used as selective sorbent materials, can be packed in an HPLC
precolumn for the on-line mode and in a cartridge between two frits for the off-line mode [14].
The on-line MISPE procedure, is directly coupled with specific analytical systems such as HPLC,
minimizing samples manipulation and reducing the loss of analytes and the risk of contamination [92,94].
Furthermore, this method considerably reduces the time for pretreatment of the samples. Despite these
advantages, the off-line method is the most used for its simplicity. Moreover, more solvents can be
handled without regard to their influence on the successive separation methods.
The principle of MISPE is based on the same main four steps as classical SPE: conditioning of
the sorbent, loading of the sample, washing away interferences and elution of the target analytes
(Figure 6). In the loading step, the sample is percolated through the MIP sorbents. Generally, this
solvent must have a polarity similar to that used in the polymerization process, since it increases the
number of interactions between analyte and specific binding sites in the MIP sorbents [46].
MISPE was applied for extraction of several compounds in different sample matrices such as
biological [54,95–104], environmental samples [15,105–111] and also in food analysis [16,112–117].
The first application of MISPE was made by Sellergren in 1994 which prepared a selective
extraction of pentamidine, a drug used for the treatment of AIDS-related disorders, in urine samples [95].
The pentamidine-imprinted materials were prepared by in situ polymerization in a chromatographic
column coupled with a simple HPLC system.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5922
Figure 6. The four steps of the MISPE process.
Recently, some MISPE for vitamins and nucleoside, derivatives from biological matrices, were
prepared. A highly selective MIP for 1-methyladenosine (1-MA), an urinary modified nucleoside
which is used as cancer marker, has been prepared and used as sorbent material in an off-line SPE
mode [54]. The polymer has been obtained by bulk polymerization using MAA as functional monomer
and a mixture of acetonitrile/water (4:1, v/v) as porogen, to overcome the problems related to the
imprinting of biological compounds. As can be seen from Figure 7, 1-MA has been selectively
extracted by the MIP polymer after removing the interfering compounds present in the urine.
Figure 7. Chromatograms corresponding to (a) human urine; (b) human urine spiked
with 1-MA; and (c) elution solution after MISPE of spiked urine. Peak identification:1,
1-MA (Adapted from [54]).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5923
In another study [96] a selective molecularly imprinted polymer, obtained by bulk polymerization
technique, was prepared as sorbent for solid phase extraction of nicotinamide. Moreover, the
performances of the imprinted polymer have been compared to that of non-imprinted polymer and with
conventional reversed-phase C18 performances and have shown better results (Table 1).
Table 1. Recoveries of nicotinamide in spiked pork liver samples using different SPE
sorbents (n = 3, spiked level, 49 µg mL−1) (Adapted from [96]).
SPE sorbent
N-MIP
NIP
RP C18
Recovery (%)
87
12
14
RSD (%)
8
5
6
Javanbakht and co-workers have recently studied the extraction of important drugs from biological
samples, such as plasma and urine. They followed a new water-compatible methodology for
determination of the analgesic Tramadol from biological fluids, using MISPE as the sample clean-up
technique combined with HPLC [97]. The water-compatible imprinted polymer was prepared using
MAA as monomers and chloroform as porogen; loading the sample with water at pH 8 and using
methanol/acetic acid (10:1, v/v) as elution solvents. The results showed that the recoveries of
Tramadol for the spiked human plasma and urine samples were higher than 91% in the range of
10–50 μL−1. The same methodology was used to extract other drugs from plasma and urine, such as
Verapamil, an L-type calcium channel blocker [98] and Bromhexine, a mucolytic agent [99].
MISPE procedure combined with HPLC was also applied to extract Testosterone and Progesterone
and other important drugs from urine [100,101,104].
In recent years, MISPE was extensively applied also for the determination of analytes in
environmental samples. In particular, phenolic compounds were widely studied for their pronounced
toxicity and their wide distribution in several environmental samples. In the last few years, a new
class-selective sorbent for SPE to pre-concentrate the environmental pollutants, phenolic compounds,
from spiked water samples was developed by Peipei et al. [105]. A MIP was prepared by bulk method
using 2,4-dimethylphenol, that has been chosen, because of its low toxicity, as template. Synthesis
optimization was done by using three different porogens, chloroform, acetonitrile and toluene and the
difference in recognition selectivity of the polymer columns was observed in HPLC system. The SPE
methodology was then developed and used to preconcentrate phenolic compounds in the environmental
water. The resulting MIP showed good selectivity for 2,4-dimethylphenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol,
4-chlorophenol, 4-methylphenol and phenol. The application of MIP-SPE to environmental water
samples confirms the ability of the MIP sorbent to class-selectively isolate phenolic compounds from
the complex matrix.
On-line MISPE coupled to reversed-phase HPLC was also applied to selective extraction of
4-nitrophenol in real water samples [106]. MISPE was also applied for the extraction of herbicides, so,
several MISPEs for Triazine-based herbicides have been reported for different food matrix such as
vegetables and fruits, involving extraction of different analytes such as simazine [112], propazine [113],
propazine methacrylate [114], etc. From the examples reported above we can say that MISPE is
a competitive analysis procedure compared with traditional solid-phase extraction for the stability
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5924
and low cost of preparation of the imprinted materials. Today there are already MISPE cartridges
commercially available for selective extraction of several molecules [112,118] which will increase
MISPE applications in analytical chemistry.
It is well known that template residues are present in the polymer matrix even after exhaustive
washing steps and leakage of the template can affect the accuracy of detection in trace analysis.
To overcome this bleeding problem the MIP can be synthesized by using a close structural analogue of
the analyte as template (also called dummy template) that can capture also the target analyte since very
similar cavities are generated [119,120]. According to a recent work [120], a MIP for
5-nitroimidazole recognition was prepared using a template analogue which was different from the
analytes studied, methacrylic acid as monomer and divinylbenzene as cross-linker in chloroform. For
the first time a MISPE protocol was developed for the selective extraction of four different
5-nitroimidazoles and three of their metabolites in egg powder. The 5-nitroimidazoles and their
deuterated analogues showed similar and good behavior on the MISPE cartridges with satisfactory
linearity at the concentration studied. The validated method provided enough accuracy, reproducibility
and sensitivity. In the real matrice, the lack of real internal standard was observed for two analytes
while the others gave recovery higher than 91%.
Several studies applying imprinting technology to different selective extraction techniques have
appeared over the last few years such as Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME), Stir-Bar Sorptive
Extraction (SBSE) and Matrix Solid Phase Dispersion (MSPD) techniques.
The first work on SPME appeared in 1990 [121] and, since then, many different studies have
looked at using this simple method to extract different analytes from many different matrices. Firstly
the fibers were synthesized and then MIPs were used as sorbents on those fibers by using a bulk
polymerization method. In this case, the monolith obtained from traditional polymerization is attached
to a solid support. A suitable silylation of the support is important for this technique, but there is no
standardization so far on the fibers preparation step and there are several different supports described
in literature to attach the fibers. The most widely-used support has been a commercial fiber in which
the coating surface has been etched away [122,123]. For instance, Prasad et al. extracted ascorbic acid
from human serum with recoveries of 100% without any sample pretreatment. Another way to obtain
SPME fibers is, by using a glass capillary, filling it with the polymerization mixture and inducing the
polymerization process inside [124,125]. Another support that can be used is a hollow tube, such as an
optic fiber, to which the MIP is attached [126]. A common limit for most of these fibers is their
fragility since they are formed by highly cross-linked monolithic polymer.
MIPs have been used as coating agents also for Stir-Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE)
technique [127–129] first introduced by Baltussen et al. in 1999 [130] with the main purpose of
increasing the mass of sorbent used in SPME fibers. This technique is based on the use of a magnet
covered of polydimethylsiloxane which is able to retain some compounds present in solution.
Desorption of the extracted compounds is performed using very low volumes of organic solvent or
thermally in gas chromatography equipment. For instance, Hu et al. [129] selectively extracted four
extrogens from water samples. They used an iron bar held inside a glass tube and sililated the outer
surface of the glass. Then the glass was put inside a mixture of polydimethylsiloxane, β-cyclodextrin
as the template molecule and all the typical compounds involved in the synthesis of a normal stir-bar
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5925
and a molecularly imprinted polymerization. This step was repeated several times until the desired
thickness of the stir-bar was achieved.
Matrix Solid-Phase Dispersion (MSPD), commonly used for solid samples, is another extraction
technique which differs from the previous ones mainly since the extraction can also be performed
directly on solid, semisolid and viscous samples. In this technique the sample of interest and the
sorbent are blended together; then, the obtained mixture is packed into an empty column or a SPE
cartridge or a syringe. Finally, the analytes can be extracted through two different ways depending on
their affinity towards the sorbent used. When there is a high retention of the analyte of interest on the
sorbent, a solvent can be added into the cartridge to remove the interfering compounds; while if the
analyte of interest is not strongly retained on the sorbent, a solvent able to disrupt only the weaker
interactions can be added to directly remove the analyte. In MSPD extraction method, any
commercially available sorbent can be used. Some authors have also tried to combine the advantages
that MIPs offer for selective extraction with the simplicity of the present technique [131,132].
Guo et al. [131] determined a chloramphenicol amount in fish tissue samples with higher recoveries
than any other commercially available sorbent.
3.2. MIPs as Chemical Sensors and Biosensors
In the last years, chemical sensors and biosensors are of increasing interest in the field of modern
analytical chemistry, as can be seen from the growing number of published papers. This is due to new
demands that are appearing particularly in clinical diagnostics, environmental analysis and also in food
analysis. Recently, a big effort to synthesize artificial receptors capable of binding a target analyte with
comparable affinity and selectivity to natural antibodies or enzymes has been done.
MIP technology can also be used as antibody-like materials with high selectivity and sensitivity,
owing to their long-therm stability, chemical inertness and insolubility in water and most organic
solvents [133]. To date, MIPs have been successfully used with different types of transducers and
several methods have been used to achieve a close integration of the transduction platform with the
polymer [24]. In particular, the integration of MIPs with sensors can be realized by in situ
polymerization, using a photochemical or thermal initiator [134], or by surface grafting with chemical
or UV initiation [135,136]. The advantage of this latter approach lies in the possibility of controlled
modification of inert electrode surfaces with thin films of specific polymers.
Moreover, polymers can also be electropolymerized on the surface of transduction platform. In this
case, there are some adhesion problems, especially during the washing process of the polymerized
MIP-coated QCM (Quartz Cristal Microbalance) with organic solvents that, sometimes lead to a partly
peeling off of the MIP layers produced. For this reason, specific pretreatment to enhance the adhesion
of MIPs on transducer platforms, must be done.
The first generation of MIP sensors was prepared using imprinted polymers synthesized in the form
of monoliths. The obtained MIP particles were deposited in close proximity to the electrode by
incorporation of the particles into the carbon paste of screen-printed electrode [137] or into a
supporting agarose gel [138]. It was observed that the response of the sensor was strongly dependent
on how intimately the MIP and transduction element were integrated and how efficient the electrical
communication was between them.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5926
Competitive amperometric morphine sensor using MIP particulates immobilised with agar gel
on the electrode surface, has been reported by Mosbach’s group [139]. The device employed a
competitive two-stage displacement strategy in which initially the electro-active template bound to a
morphine imprinted polymer which had been immobilized in a thin layer of agarose. Subsequently an
electro-inactive competitor, codeine, was added which resulted in the displacement of the morphine
from the MIP. The displaced template was then determined amperometrically. The result obtained in
this study reported a working concentration range of 0.1–1.0 µg/mL and also a stability of the sensor in
a range of different conditions. In particular these results suggest a high degree of ruggedness.
MIP-based recognition elements were also prepared as layers or thin films by deposition or grafting
onto the transducer platform [140,141]. The thickness of the film deposited on the transducer
is important to obtain a good time response of the sensor. This approach was firstly used with
acoustic [142] and optical [143] transducers and then with electrochemical sensors [144].
Today, a simple approach to obtain sensor device, is the combination of MIPs with a piezoelectric
transducer (e.g., quartz) to create an acoustic sensor called QCM-MIP sensor. The coating of the
crystal with the MIP can be obtained by in situ polymerization directly onto the surface of the
device [145,146] or via pre-prepared MIP particles that are immobilized on the sensor surface using a
PVC matrix [147].
A QCM-MIP sensor has been employed by Peng and co-workers to obtain a sensor device
for atropine detection. In this case, the electropolymerization approach was used to prepare an
aniline-co-O-phenylenediamine atropine MIP layer onto a piezoelectric quartz crystal to realize a bulk
acoustic-wave sensor. The MIP sensor obtained was successfully employed to determine atropine
concentrations in human serum and urine [148].
Moreover, a sorbitol-based MIP was also prepared by electropolymerization of o-phenylenediamine
on a QCM surface [149]. Over a concentration range of 0–16 mM the resulting sensor showed high
selectivity for sorbitol, compared with glucose, glycerol, mannitol and fructose.
In another study, an imprinted polymer-coated sensor was created by Tan et al. to determine the
amount of paracetamol and nicotine in biological fluids [150,151]. In this case, piezoelectric quartz
crystal surface was modified using a paracetamol imprinted polymer as sensing materials to obtain
selectivity for a Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) sensor. The kinetic impedance analysis showed no
change in the viscoelasticity of the polymer coating during the detection. Satisfactory results have been
obtained in the recognition of paracetamol in human serum and urine.
Recently, Ersőz and co-workers have developed a new QCM sensor for specific determination of
8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), an oxidative stress marker [152]. The MIPs was prepared by
in situ polymerization of methacryloylamidohistidine-platinum(II) and N-N’-methylenebisacrylamide
on QCM surface and used to determine the amount of (8-OHdG) in the blood of cancer patients.
QCM-MIP sensor was also realized for detection of daminozide, a potential carcinogenic chemical
important in food safety [5] but also for detection of environmental pollutants such as bisphenol
A [153], acetaldehyde [153] and monoterpenes [154].
MIPs were also widely employed as sensors for enantiomeric separation of different compounds
such as R and S-propranolol, D and L-tryptophan, and D and L-serine enantiomers [147,155,156].
Several efforts to adapt MIP-based QCM sensing technology to chiral recognition of (S)-propranolol
have been reported by Haupt and co-workers that created an enantioselective chiral recognition layers
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5927
on the gold-coated surfaces of 5 MHz quartz crystals employing a poly(TRIM-co-MAA) MIP
formulation [147]. To ensure the formation of homogeneous MIP coatings and to minimize inhibition
of polymerization by oxygen, the imprinting mixture was sandwiched between the QCM and a quartz
cover plate before polymerization. This sandwich exposed to UV irradiation produced MIP films
2 µm thick with good adherence to the supporting resonator surface. The results obtained showed a
pronounced decrease in the resonator frequency for (S)-propranolol over the analyte
concentration range investigated (0.05 to 1.5 mmol L−1) whereas (R)-propanolol induced only minor
frequency changes.
However, in terms of sensibility, MIP-based biomimetic sensors are still rather inferior to
biosensors because they require further optimization of the MIPs and the transducers. An interesting
area of research was the preparation of mass sensitive MIP sensors for cells and viruses. In particular,
Dickert and co-workers realized a QCM-MIP sensor able to bind with excellent specificity the yeast
Saccaromyces cerevisiae used as template in the imprinting process [157]. The same authors used a
similar approach to obtain a molecularly imprinted polymer sensor for tobacco mosaic virus and red
blood cells [158,159].
During the last decade, the MIP technology has been extensively studied for its potential applications
in pseudo-immunoassay [28]. In particular, the first Molecularly Imprinted Sorbent Assay (MIA) was
reported by Mosbach for detection of theophylline in serum in comparison with the commercial
Enzyme-Multiplied Immunoassay Technique (EMIT) [160]. This first MIA showed an excellent
correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.98) with EMIT, and also produced a strikingly similar
cross-reactivity profile to that of natural antibodies. Although this MIA method was found to be more
cumbersome, it was cheaper and faster than that of natural antibodies. Moreover, MIPs have
demonstrated remarkable stability under storage in dry state at ambient temperatures, surviving for
several years without loss of recognition capability.
The competitive formats of MIAs can be divided into two categories: homologous and
non-homologous assays, in which analyte and probe are chemically identical or chemically different
respectively. Radio-labeled MIAs were the first examples of homologous assays where the probe is
just the radio-labeled form of the analyte used as template in the imprinting process. In particular,
novel imprinting processes to create spherical, molecular imprinted beads were employed in
radio-labeled MIAs as alternatives to conventional MIP particles preparation with several advantages
such as enhanced selectivity, low cross-reactivity and a simple bead preparation.
Recently, Ye et al. synthesized (R,S)-propranolol imprinted microspherical beads by a modified
precipitation polymerization and they were used in competitive radio-labeled MIAs for chiral analysis
of propranolol, using (S)-[4-3H]Propranolol as radioactive probe. When the MIP was used in
scintillation proximity assays, the binding of the radio-labeled template determined a transfer of energy
from template to scintillant resulting in the generation of a fluorescence signal [161]. In another
study, 17β-estradiol imprinted beads prepared by precipitation polymerization were employed in a
competitive radio-labeled MIAs to obtain a stereoselectivity for 17β-estradiol over its diasteroisomer
17α-estradiol [78].
Nevertheless, the practical applications of this technology are heavily restrained due to the inherent
complications of handling and disposing of radioactive materials. For this reason, fluorescent analogues of
analytes were employed as alternative probes in MIAs. Conventional fluorescent-labeled MIAs is an
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5928
example of non-homologous assay where the MIP is prepared using the analyte itself as template in the
imprinting process and a fluorescent probe in place of the radioactive probe. However, a problem that
hinders the development of this technique is due to different structures of the fluorescent probe,
which has additional fluorescent groups to that of the analyte, inducing a decrease of sensitivity and
selectivity. Nevertheless, in the last few years, many researchers have focused their interest on
fluorescence-labeled MIAs [162–165] primarily for their attractive practical features in
future applications.
3.3. MIPs in Catalysis
Considerable efforts have been made to investigate the possible use of MIP for catalytic
applications [25–72]. The high selectivity and strength of these polymers make them suitable to be
used at elevated temperatures and pressures, in the presence of several organic solvents, and also
under acidic and basic reaction conditions. For these reasons, MIPs can be employed instead of
biomolecules, such as enzymes and natural catalytic antibodies [166] which are highly vulnerable to
certain conditions.
The use of MIP for catalytic application is very important because MIP catalysts are able to mimic
the selectivity and sterospecificity of the binding domains of antibodies and enzymes which are
generally utilized as catalysts in several reactions. Catalytically active imprinted materials can be
obtained using analogues of substrates, transition states or products as templates in the imprinting
protocol [29]. The polymer matrix obtained has cavities with a shape similar to the shape of the
template used [72,167]; but the imprinting technology must also ensure the right placement of the
functional groups in the binding sites in consideration of the type of catalytic process that they will
assist [168].
The strategy using substrate analogues as template, involves the use of compounds that mimic the
reaction complex between the substrate and the matrix. The catalytic groups will be introduced in the
right positions into the cavities of the polymer and subsequently they will act catalytically in presence
of the true substrate. Leonhardt and Mosbach applied this strategy to obtain an imprinted matrix with
esterolytic activity using Cobalt (II) ions to coordinate vinylimidazole groups and template during
polymerization. Subsequent introduction of the substrates, such as p-nitrophenyl esters of methionine
or leucine, into the cavities of polymer, leads to an acceleration and substrate-specific hydrolysis of
amino acid analogues [169]. The same strategy was applied by Shea and Beach to obtain a
dehydrofluorination of β-fluoroketones using N-(2-aminoethyl)mathacrylamide as basic functional
monomer with catalytic groups (Figure 8). Several dicarboxylic acids were employed as template
analogues to obtain the correct positioning of the amino groups in the cavities of the polymer. It has
been seen that the catalytic activity of the polymer mainly depends on the position of carboxylic
groups of the template. Benzylmalonic acid has proven to be the best template to obtain the most
active imprinted polymer [170].
An alternative approach to obtain the same results was the use, in the polymerization process, of a
basic Transitional State Analogue (TSA) and MAA respectively as basic template and acidic
functional monomers. The use of the MIP catalyst in the reaction process led to an increase in
dehydrofluorination rate compared with the uncatalyzed reaction. The TSA approach was followed by
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5929
Wulff and co-worker to obtain a phosphonate ester imprinted polymer using amidines as monomers.
The amidines have the ability to bind carboxylic acids and phosphonate esters with very high affinity,
such that the complexes are almost completely in the associated form, even in water. The catalyst was
tested on the hydrolysis reaction of analogous carboxylate esters. High catalytic activity was seen,
despite the nonactivated nature of the esters. The reaction rate was 100 times higher for the imprinted
matrices compared with the uncatalysed solution reaction [171].
Figure 8. MIP catalytic systems developed by Beach and Shea (Adapted from [170]).
Very recently, Li et al. [172,173] prepared smart imprinting systems with catalytic activity.
A catalytic and positively thermoresponsive MIP was prepared for the first time and used for catalytic
hydrolysis of 4-nitrophenyl acetate, used as model reaction. At a relatively low temperature, such as
20 °C, the polymer did not show significant catalysis due to the interpolymer complexation that causes
a shrinking of the system and blocks the access to the active sites. On the contrary, at higher
temperature, such as 40 °C, the MIP gave significant catalytic activity [172]. In another work, Li et al.
reported a smart like-enzyme imprinted polymer composed of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-containing
p-nitrophenyl phosphate-imprinted networks. In this case, at a relatively low temperature, such as
20 °C, the polymer showed vigorous catalysis due to its hydrophilic network that enables the access to
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5930
the active sites while at higher temperatures, a significant decrease of MIP hydrophilicity causes
shrinking of the imprinted polymer which inhibited its catalytic activity [173].
Finally, thermodynamic and kinetic studies were also carried out on MIPs catalytic systems with the
aim of understanding molecular imprinting and its specificity [174]. The p-nitrophenyl
phosphate-imprinted polymer was prepared, characterized and used as catalyst for a model hydrolysis
reaction. Kinetic studies indicate that the specific mechanism from imprinted polymer catalysts can be
internally due to the larger speedup for the imprint species. The reaction rate of the imprint species can
be much higher than that of its analogue. Thermodynamic study also implies that the induction
generated from the specific imprint to the imprint species is stronger than to its analogue. Thus, the
increasing rate and the larger induction, in logic, may be responsible for the specific recognition
and catalysis.
3.4. MIPs in Drug Delivery
The ability of MIPs to bind strongly and selectively bioactive molecules makes these materials
suitable for their potential application in biological field. The high loading capacity and the prolonged
release time of the analytes, such as drugs, amounts to MIPs having a huge potential for creating
suitable dosage forms [26].
In the last years, an area of great challenge in MIP technology is that of therapeutic agents, various
MIPs have been used as unusual synthetic polymeric carriers to prepare drug delivery systems [175,176].
An efficient drug delivery system should ensure that the drug is released at the right site, in the right
dose and for the right period of time [177].
MIPs for drug delivery applications should have specific characteristics: the imprinted cavities
should be stable to maintain the conformation in the absence of the template, but also flexible to
facilitate the realization of a fast equilibrium between the release and re-uptake of the template in the
cavity. To this end, the non-covalent imprinting provides faster equilibrium kinetics than the covalent
imprinting approach [178,179]. Furthermore, MIPs should be stable to resist enzymatic and chemical
attacks and mechanical stress that can be found in biological fluids.
Imprinted-drug delivery systems have not reached clinical applications yet because the adaptability
of molecular imprinting technology for drug delivery requires important remarks on safety and
toxicological concerns since the polymer devices will go into contact with biological tissues without
causing toxic effects [180]. The MIPs are normally synthesized in organic solvents to improve
hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions [178]. Nevertheless, the presence of organic solvents,
commonly used in MIPs synthesis, may cause cellular damages. For this reason, in drug delivery
processes, it is usually advantageous to prepare hydrophilic polymers which are compatible with
biological systems. Alternatively precipitation polymerization method can be used since the polymer is
usually completely immiscible with the solvent used for MIP preparation allowing easy polymer
separation from the solvent [176]. Molecular imprinting water compatible is still under development
and there are many problems due to the considerable weakness of hydrogen bonding and electrostatic
interactions in water that decrease the selectivity of the MIP for the target molecule. However, metal
coordination and hydrophobic interactions can be exploited to enhance template and functional
monomer interactions [65,181].
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5931
Recently, molecularly imprinted hydrogels for the recognition of cholesterol have been prepared by
molecular design of methacrylate-based structures containing poly(ethylene glycol) in moderately and
highly cross-linked networks. Swelling studies have been done to analyze the cross-linked structures of
the prepared hydrogels and recognitive studies have been carried out to evaluate the influence of
different reaction conditions on the ability of the systems to absorb cholesterol. The imprinted
hydrogels have shown an excellent ability to recognize and release the analyte of interest [182].
In recent years, many researchers have published about the use of MIPs in drug delivery
applications [179,183] given their physicochemical properties to protect the drug from degradation by
enzymes during systemic trafficking in the body. Several drugs have been used as templates to achieve
polymeric devices, capable of prolonging the release profile of specific therapeutic agents with better
performance as compared to more traditional drug delivery system [175].
The first report of imprinted polymers used as sustained release devices has been presented by
Norell and co-workers [184]. Theophylline-imprinted polymer has been prepared by a non-covalent
approach for its possible application as a controlled release. The polymer obtained was able to sustain
a slow drug release in pH 7.0 phosphate buffer for several hours. Allender et al. prepared MIPs for
Propranolol (a β-adrenergic antagonist) using methacrylic acid (MAA) as a functional monomer to
create a transdermal controlled release device and they demonstrated that the permeation of Propanolol
was slower for the MIP than from the non-imprinted polymer. Thus, these Propranolol-imprinted
systems can be used to prolong the delivery profile [185]. Similar results were obtained with other
drugs, such as tetracycline [186] and sulfasalazine [187]. Cai and Gupta [186] using tetracycline as
template synthesized MIPs with higher binding ability compared with corresponding non-imprinted
polymers. The obtained results indicated that the high MIP affinity can be utilized in control release
applications, in fact the tetracycline release from MIP was slower than non-imprinted polymer.
In another study [188] a molecularly imprinted polymer enables to rebind nicotinamide selectively and
release it in a sustained way was prepared. MIPs microspheres have shown also a higher binding
properties and sustained release compared to the non-imprinted one. This polymer could represent
a promising system in the preparation of nicotinamide controlled formulations for oral administrations.
In order to get controlled release of nicotinamide, various MIPs have been synthesized with methacrylic
acid and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate by precipitation polymerization. It has been found that the use
of different stoichiometric ratio between template, monomer, and cross-linking agent influences
binding and release properties of the polymer.
Intelligent drug release, refers to the release of a therapeutic agent, may occur as a result of a
specific stimuli such as the presence of another molecule. A system with similar characteristics, able to
release testosterone at a rate depending on the concentration of hydrocortisone, was described by
Sreenivasan et al. In this study, hydrocortisone as template was used for the preparation of MIP. After
the removal of target analyte, the MIP was loaded with testosterone, which is a structurally similar
molecule. It was seen that the rate of testosterone release increased when hydrocortisone was present
in the solution as a result of template responsive release [189].
Molecularly imprinted polymers can be used also to bind several substances in the gastrointestinal
tract, blocking their absorption in the body, as a complement of the pharmacological therapy. In this
contest, MIPs as chemical traps to remove undesirable substances from the body, such as glucose,
cholesterol [182,190,191], bile acid [192] and melittin [193] were developed. Hoshino and coworkers
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5932
prepared imprinted polymers nanoparticles able to efficiently capture the cytotoxic peptide melittin in
the bloodstream, synthesizing protein-size polymer particles with a binding affinity and selectively
comparable to those of natural antibodies, by combining MIP nanoparticle synthesis with a functional
monomer optimization strategy [193].
4. Conclusions
This review has attempted to outline various aspects of molecular imprinting technologies. All
considered features present strengths and weaknesses and for any specific application some advantages
or problems need to be evaluated.
Important progress in the synthesis and application of MIPs has been reported consistently in the
literature within recent years. Low cost, excellent stability and continuously advancing performance of
MIPs make these polymers the most promising synthetic materials for molecular recognition in
different scientific fields.
New procedures of alternative syntheses for bulk polymerization that can improve the properties of
MIPs particles, should promote future development of MIPs in different application fields.
MIPs have been widely studied as HPLC stationary phases, especially for chiral separation.
However, in this field one aspect that would enhance performance would be to overcome the
broadening and tailing of the template peak that is often observed.
More recently, an increasing number of papers on MISPE have been produced. MISPE is
a competitive analysis procedure for the stability and low cost preparation of the imprinted
materials, compared with traditional solid-phase extraction. Today there are already MISPE cartridges
commercially available for selective extraction of several molecules [112,118].
In recent years, particular attention has been directed to the development of MIPs as selective
material for sensors and biosensors. However, in terms of sensibility, MIP-based biomimetic sensors
are still rather inferior to biosensors because they require further optimization of the MIPs and the
transducers. Thus, although the stimulating ongoing work in this field, the commercial development of
molecular imprinting sensors is still in its infancy.
Catalysis and drug delivery applications have not yet been thoroughly investigated. Applications in
these areas are only just beginning to emerge and there are several potential aspects to be explored that
could produce progress in the next few years.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University of Salento (Lecce, Italy) for financial support (60%) and
Consorzio INCA.
References
1.
2.
Takagishi, T.; Klotz, I.M. Macromolecule-small molecule interactions; introduction of additional
binding sites in polyethyleneimine by disulfide cross-linkages. Biopolymers 1972, 11, 483–491.
Wulff, G.; Sarhan, A. Use of polymers with enzyme-analogous structures for the resolution of
racemates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1972, 11, 341–342.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
5933
Mosbach, K.; Ramstrőm, O. The emerging technique of molecular imprinting and its future
impact on biotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 163–170.
Whitcombe, M.J.; Alexander, C.; Vulfson, E.N. Smart polymers for the food industry. Trends
Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 140–145.
Yan, S.; Fang, Y.; Gao, Z. Quartz crystal microbalance for the determination of daminozide
using molecularly imprinted polymers as recognition element. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22,
1087–1091.
Alexander, C.; Andersson, H.S.; Andersson, L.I.; Ansell, R.J.; Kirsch, N.; Nicholls, I.A.;
O’Mahony, J.; Whitcombe, M.J. Molecular imprinting science and technology: A survey of the
literature for the years up to and including 2003. J. Mol. Recognit. 2006, 19, 106–180.
Ye, L.; Mosbach, K. Molecular imprinting: Synthetic materials as substitutes for biological
antibodies and receptors. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 859–868.
Piletska, E.V.; Guerreiro, A.R.; Whitcombe, M.J.; Piletsky, S.A. Influence of the polymerization
conditions on the performance of molecularly imprinted polymers. Macromolecules 2009, 42,
4921–4928.
Poma, A.; Turner, A.P.F.; Piletsky, S.A. Advances in the manufacture of MIP nanoparticles.
Trends Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 629–637.
Bossi, A.; Bonini, F.; Turner, A.P.F.; Piletsky, S.A. Molecularly imprinted polymers for the
recognition of proteins: The state of the art. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 1131–1137.
Morelli, I.; Chiono, V.; Vozzi, G.; Ciardelli, G.; Silvestri, D.; Giusti, P. Molecularly imprinted
submicronspheres for applications in a novel model biosensor-film. Sens. Actuators B 2010, 150,
394–401.
Scorrano, S.; Mergola, L.; Del Sole, R.; Vasapollo, G. Synthesis of molecularly imprinted
polymers for amino acid derivates by using different functional monomers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011,
12, 1735–1743.
Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G. Molecularly imprinted polymers as nucleotide receptors. Mini-Rev.
Org. Chem. 2008, 5, 163–170.
Pichon, V.; Chapuis-Hugon, F. Role of molecularly imprinted polymers for selective
determination of environmental pollutants—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 622, 48–61.
Tamayo, F.G.; Casillas, J.L.; Martin-Esteban, A. Clean up of phenylurea herbicides in plant
sample extracts using molecular imprinted polymer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 381,
1234–1240.
Puoci, F.; Cirillo, G.; Curcio, M.; Iemma, F.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Picci, N. Molecularly imprinted
solid phase extraction for the selective HPLC determination of α-tocopherol in bay leaves.
Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 593, 164–170.
Baggiani, C.; Anfossi, L.; Giovannoli, C. Solid phase extraction of food contaminants using
molecular imprinted polymers. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 591, 29–39.
Andersson, L.I. Molecular imprinting: Developments and applications in the analytical chemistry
field. J. Chromatogr. B 2000, 745, 3–13.
Sellergren, B. Imprinted chiral stationary phases in high-performance liquid chromatography.
J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 906, 227–252.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
5934
Wei, S.; Mizaikoff, B. Recent advances on noncovalent molecular imprints for affinity
separations. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 1794–1805.
Tamayo, F.G.; Turiel, E.; Martín-Esteban, A. Molecularly imprinted polymers for solid-phase
extraction and solid-phase microextraction: Recent developments and future trends.
J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1152, 32–40.
Haginaka, J. Monodispersed, molecularly imprinted polymers as affinity-based chromatography
media. J. Chromatogr. B 2008, 866, 3–13.
Lasáková, M.; Jandera, P. Molecularly imprinted polymers and their application in solid phase
extraction. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 788–812.
Piletsky, S.A.; Turner, N.W.; Laitenberger, P. Molecularly imprinted polymers in clinical
diagnostics-future potential and existing problems. Med. Eng. Phys. 2006, 28, 971–977.
Li, W.; Li, S. Molecular imprinting: A versatile tool for separation, sensors and catalysis.
Adv. Polym. Sci. 2007, 206, 191–210.
Puoci, F.; Iemma, F.; Picci, N. Stimuli-responsive molecularly imprinted polymers for drug
delivery: A review. Curr. Drug Deliv. 2008, 5, 85–96.
Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G. Phthalocyanine-based molecularly imprinted polymers as nucleoside
receptors. Met.-Based Drugs 2008, 2008, 1–5.
Ge, Y.; Turner, E.P.F. Molecularly imprinted sorbent assays: Recent developments and
applications. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 8100–8107.
Ramstrom, O.; Mosbach, K. Synthesis and catalysis by molecularly imprinted materials.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 759–764.
Annamma, K.M.; Mathew, B. Design of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid imprinted polymer with
high specificity and selectivity. Mater. Sci. Appl. 2011, 2, 131–140.
Del Sole, R.; de Luca, A.; Catalano, M.; Mele, G.; Vasapollo, G. Noncovalent imprinted
microsphere: Preparation, evaluation and selectivity of DBU template. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007,
105, 2190–2197.
Cacho, C.; Turiel, E.; Martin-Esteban, A.; Pérez-Code, C.; Cámara, C. Characterisation and
quality assessment of binding sites on a propazine-imprinted polymer prepared by precipitation
polymerisation. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 802, 347–353.
Lee, W.C.; Cheng, C.H.; Pan, H.H.; Chung, T.H.; Hwang, C.C. Chromatographic characterization
of molecularly imprinted polymers. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 390, 1101–1109.
Longo, L.; Scorrano, S.; Vasapollo, G. RNA nucleoside recognition by phthalocyanine-based
molecularly imprinted polymers. J. Polym. Res. 2010, 17, 683–687.
Arshady, R.; Mosbach, K. Synthesis of substrate-selective polymers by host-guest polymerization.
Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1981, 182, 687–692.
Hwang, C.C.; Lee, W.C. Chromatographic characteristic of cholesterol-imprinted polymers
prepared by covalent and non-covalent imprinting methods. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 962, 69–78.
Molinelli, A.; O’Mahony, J.; Nolan, K.; Smyth, M.R.; Jakusch, M.; Mizaikoff, B. Analyzing
the mechanisms of selectivity in biomimetic self-assemblies via IR and NMR spectroscopy
of prepolymerization solutions and molecular dynamics simulations. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77,
5196–5204.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
5935
Wei, S.; Jakusch, M.; Mizaikoff, B. Investigating the mechanisms of 17β-estradiol imprinting by
computational prediction and spectroscopic analysis. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 423–431.
Karlsson, B.C.G.; O’Mahony, J.; Karlsson, J.G.; Bengtsson, H.; Eriksson, L.A.; Nicholls, I.A.
Structure and dynamics of monomer-template complexation: An explanation for molecularly
imprinted polymer recognition site heterogeneity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13297–13304.
Del Sole, R.; Lazzoi, M.R.; Arnone, M.; Della Sala, F.; Cannoletta, D.; Vasapollo, G.
Experimental and computational studies on non-covalent imprinted microspheres as recognition
system for nicotinamide. Molecules 2009, 14, 2632–2649.
Yañez, F.; Chianella, I.; Piletsky, S.A.; Concheiro, A.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Computational
modeling and molecular imprinting for the development of acrylic polymers with high affinity
for bile salts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 659, 178–185.
Pietrzyk, A.; Kutner, W.; Chitta, R.; Zandler, M.E.; D’Souza, F.; Sannicolò, F.; Mussini, P.R.
Melamine acoustic chemosensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer film. Anal. Chem.
2009, 81, 10061–10070.
O’Mahony, J.; Karlsson, B.C.G.; Mizaikoff, B.; Nicholls, I.A. Correlated theoretical, spectroscopic
and X-ray crystallographic studies of a non-covalent molecularly imprinted polymerisation
system. Analyst 2007, 132, 1161–1168.
Athikomrattanakul, U.; Katterle, M.; Gajovic-Eichelmann, N.; Scheller, F.W. Development of
molecularly imprinted polymers for the binding of nitrofurantoin. biosens. Bioelectron 2009, 25,
82–87.
Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G.; Scardino, A.; Picca, R.A.; Malitesta, C. Synthesis of a new
substituted zinc phthalocyanine as functional monomer in the preparation of MIPs. J. Porphyr.
Phthalocyanines 2006, 10, 1061–1065.
Spivak, D.; Gilmore, M.A.; Shea, K.J. Evaluation of binding and origins of specificity of
9-ethyladenine imprinted polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4388–4393.
Hart, B.R.; Shea, K.J. Synthetic peptide receptors: Molecularly imprinted polymers for the
recognition of peptides using peptide-metal interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2072–2073.
Urraca, J.L.; Hall, A.J.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C.; Sellergren, B. A stoichiometric molecularly
imprinted polymer for the class-selective recognition of antibiotics in aqueous media.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5158–5161.
Sellergren, B. Polymer- and template-related factors influencing the efficiency in molecularly
imprinted solid-phase extractions. Trends Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 164–174.
Navarro-Villoslada, F.N.; San Vicente, B.; Moreno-Bondi, M. Application of multivariate
analysis to the screening of molecularly imprinted polymers for bisphenol A. Anal. Chim. Acta
2004, 504, 149–162.
Shi, X.; Wu, A.; Qu, G.; Li, R.; Zhang, D. Development and characterizations of molecularly
imprinted polymers based on methacrylic acid for selective recognition of drugs. Biomaterials
2007, 28, 3741–3749.
Ye, L.; Weiss, R.; Mosbach, K. Synthesis and characterization of molecularly imprinted
microspheres. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 8239–8245.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
5936
Yoshimatsu, K.; Reimhult, K.; Krozer, A.; Mosbach, K.; Sode, K.; Ye, L. Uniform molecularly
imprinted microspheres and nanoparticles prepared by precipitation polymerization: The control
of particle size suitable for different analytical applications. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 584,
112–121.
Scorrano, S.; Longo, L.; Vasapollo, G. Molecularly imprinted polymer for solid-phase extraction
of 1-methyladenosine from human urine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 659, 167–171.
Mayes, A.G.; Mosbach, K. Molecularly imprinted polymer beads: Suspension polymerization
using a liquid perfluorocarbon as the dispersing phase. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 3769–3774.
Zourob, M.; Mohr, S.; Mayes, A.G.; Macaskill, A.; Pérez-Moral, N.; Fielden, P.R.;
Goddard, N.J. A micro-reactor for preparing uniform molecularly imprinted polymer beads. Lab
Chip 2006, 6, 296–301.
Sergeyeva, T.A.; Brovko, O.O.; Piletska, E.V.; Piletsky, S.A.; Goncharova, L.A.;
Karabanova, L.V.; Sergeyeva, L.M.; El’skaya, A.V. Porous molecularly imprinted polymer
membranes and polymeric particles. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 582, 311–319.
Yang, H.-H.; Zhang, S.-Q.; Yang, W.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhuang, Z.-X.; Xu, J.-G.; Wang, X.-R.
Molecularly imprinted sol-gel nanotubes membrane for biochemical separations. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 4054–4055.
Lahav, M.; Katz, E.; Willner, I. Photochemical imprint of molecular recognition sites in
two-dimensional monolayers assembled on au electrodes: Effects of the monolayer structures on
the binding affinities and association kinetics to the imprinted interfaces. Langmuir 2001, 17,
7387–7395.
Lotierzo, M.; Henry, O.Y.F.; Piletsky, S.; Tothill, I.; Cullen, D.; Kania, M.; Hock, B.;
Turner, A.P.F. Surface plasmon resonance sensor for domoic acid based on grafted imprinted
polymer. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 20, 145–152.
Lanza, F.; Sellergren, B. Method for synthesis and screening of large groups of molecularly
imprinted polymers. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2092–2096.
Martin-Esteban, A.; Tadeo, J.L. Selective molecularly imprinted polymer obtained from a
combinatorial library for the extraction of bisphenol A. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen.
2006, 9, 747–751.
Dirion, B.; Cobb, Z.; Schillinger, E.; Andersson, L.I.; Sellergren, B. Water-compatible
molecularly imprinted polymers obtained via high-throughput synthesis and experimental design.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15101–15109.
Hoshino, Y.; Kodama, T.; Okahata, Y.; Shea, K.J. Peptide imprinted polymer nanoparticles:
A plastic antibody. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15242–15243.
Piletsky, S.A.; Andersson, H.S.; Nicholls, I.A. Combined hydrophobic and electrostatic
interaction-based recognition in molecularly imprinted polymers. Macromolecules 1999, 32,
633–636.
Piletska, E.V.; Romero-Guerra, M.; Guerreiro, A.R.; Karim, K.; Turner, A.P.F.; Piletsky, S.A.
Adaptation of the molecular imprinted polymers towards polar environment. Anal. Chim. Acta
2005, 542, 47–51.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
5937
Piletska, E.V.; Guerreiro, A.R.; Romero-Guerra, M.; Chianella, I.; Turner, A.P.F.; Piletsky, S.A.
Design of molecular imprinted polymers compatible with aqueous environment. Anal. Chim.
Acta 2008, 607, 54–60.
Sun, H.-W.; Qiao, F.-X. Recognition mechanism of water-compatible molecularly imprinted
solid-phase extraction and determination of nine quinolones in urine by high performance liquid
chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1212, 1–9.
Benito-Peña, E.; Martins, S.; Orellana, G.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C. Water-compatible molecularly
imprinted polymer for the selective recognition of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in biological
samples. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 2009, 393, 235–245.
Urraca, J.L.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C.; Hall, A.J.; Sellergren, B. Direct extraction of penicillin g and
derivatives from aqueous samples using a stoichiometrically imprinted polymer. Anal. Chem.
2007, 79, 695–701.
Haginaka, J.; Sanbe, H.; Takehira, H. Uniform-sized molecularly imprinted polymer for
(s)-ibuprofen retention properties in aqueous mobile phase. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 857,
117–125.
Wulff, G. Enzyme-like catalysis by molecularly imprinted polymers. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102,
1–27.
Turiel, E.; Martin-Esteban, A. Molecular Imprinting Technology in Capillary
Electrochromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2005, 28, 719–728.
Kempe, M.; Mosbach, K. Separation of amino acids, peptides and proteins on molecularly
imprinted stationary phases. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 691, 317–323.
Remcho, V.T.; Tan, Z. MIPs as chromatographic stationary phases for molecular recognition.
J. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 248A–255A.
Matsui, J.; Kato, T.; Takeuchi, T.; Suzuki, M.; Yokoyama, K.; Tamiya, E.; Karube, I.
Molecular recognition in continuous polymer rods prepared by a molecular imprinting technique.
Anal Chem. 1993, 65, 2223–2225.
Yin, J.; Yang; G.; Chen, Y. Rapid and efficient chiral separation of nateglinide and its
L-enantiomer on monolithic molecularly imprinted polymers. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1090,
68–75.
Wei, S.; Molinelli, A.; Mizaikoff, B. Molecularly imprinted micro and nanospheres for the
selective recognition of 17β-Estradiol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 21, 1943–1951.
Sellergren, B.; Ekberg, B.; Mosbach, K. Molecular imprinting of amino acid derivatives in
macroporous polymers. J. Chromatogr. 1985, 347, 1–10.
Kempe, M.; Fischer, L.; Mosbach, K. Chiral separation using molecularly imprinted heteroaromatic
polymers. J. Mol. Recognit. 1993, 6, 25–29.
Kempe, M. Antibody-mimicking polymers as chiral stationary phases in HPLC. Anal. Chem.
1996, 68, 1948–1953.
Tan, Z.J.; Remcho, V.T. molecular imprint polymers as highly selective stationary phases for
open tubular liquid chromatography and capillary electrochromatography. Electrophoresis 1998,
19, 2055–2060.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
5938
Monier, M.; El-Sokkary, A.M.A. Preparation of molecularly imprinted cross-linked
chitosan/glutaraldehyde resin for enantioselective separation of L-glutamic acid Int. J. Biol.
Macromol. 2010, 47, 207–213.
Kempe, M.; Mosbach, K. Direct resolution of naproxen on a noncovalently molecularly
imprinted chiral stationary-phase. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 664, 276–279.
Ansell, R.J. Molecularly imprinted polymers for the enantioseparation of chiral drugs Adv. Drug
Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1809–1835.
Szabelski, P.; Kaczmarski, K.; Cavazzini, A.; Chen, Y.B.; Sellergren, B.; Guiochon, G. Energetic
heterogeneity of the surface of a molecularly imprinted polymer studied by high-performance
liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 964, 99–111.
Kim, H.; Guiochon, G. Comparison of the thermodynamic properties of particulate and monolithic
columns of molecularly imprinted copolymers. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 93–102.
Vallano, P.T.; Remcho, V.T. Highly selective separations by capillary electrochromatography:
Molecular imprint polymer sorbents. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 887, 125–135.
Lämmerhofer, M.; Svec, F.; Frechet, J.M.J.; Lindner, W. Separation of enantiomers by capillary
electrochromatography. Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 676–698.
Pichon, V. Selective sample treatment using molecularly imprinted polymers. J. Chromatogr. A
2007, 1152, 41–53.
Caro, E.; Marce, R.M.; Borrull, F.; Cormack, P.A.G.; Sherrington, D.C. Application of
molecularly imprinted polymers to solid-phase extraction of compounds from environmental and
biological samples. Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25, 143–154.
He, C.; Long, Y.; Pan, J.; Li, K.; Liu, F. Application of molecularly imprinted polymers to
solid-phase extraction of analytes from real samples. J. Biochem. Biophys. Meth. 2007, 70,
133–150.
Turiel, E.; Martin-Esteban, A. Molecularly imprinted polymers for sample preparation: A review.
Anal. Chim. Acta 2010, 668, 87–99.
Masqué, N.; Marcé, R.M.; Borrull, F.; Cormack, P.A.G.; Sherrington, D.C. Synthesis and
evaluation of a molecularly imprinted polymer for selective on-line solid-phase extraction of
4-nitrophenol from environmental water. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 4122–4126.
Sellergren, B. Direct drug determination by selective sample enrichment on an imprinted
polymer. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1578–1582.
Del Sole, R.; Scardino, A.; Lazzoi, M.R.; Vasapollo, G. Molecularly imprinted polymer for
solid phase extraction of nicotinamide in pork liver samples. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 120,
1634–1641.
Javanbakht, M.; Attaran, A.M.; Namjumanesh, M.H.; Esfandyari-Manesh, M.; Akbari-adergani, B.
Solid-phase extraction of tramadol from plasma and urine samples using a novel water-compatible
molecularly imprinted polymer. J. Chromatogr. B 2010, 878, 1700–1706.
Javanbakht, M.; Shaabani, N.; Abdouss, M.; Ganjali, M.R.; Mohammadi, A.; Norouzi, P.
Molecularly imprinted polymer for selective solid-phase extraction of verapamil from biological
fluids and human urine. Curr. Pharm. Anal. 2009, 5, 269–276.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
5939
Javanbakht, M.; Namjumanesh, M.H.; Akbari-adergani, B. Molecularly imprinted solid-phase
extraction for the selective determination of bromhexine in human serum and urine with high
performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 2009, 80, 133–138.
Ričanyová, J.; Gadzala-Kopciuch, R.; Reiffova, K.; Bazel, Y.; Buszewski, B. Molecularly
imprinted adsorbents for preconcentration and extraction combined with HPLC. Adsorption
2010, 16, 473–483.
Caro, E.; Marce, R.M.; Cormack, P.A.G.; Sherrington, D.C.; Borrull, F. A new molecularly
imprinted polymer for the selective extraction of naproxen from urine samples by solid-phase
extraction. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 813, 137–143.
Andersson, L.I. Efficient sample pre-concentration of bupivacaine from human plasma by
solid-phase extraction on molecularly imprinted polymers. Analyst 2000, 125, 1515–1517.
Bereczki, A.; Tolokan, A.; Horvaia, G.; Horvath, V.; Lanza, F.; Hall, A.J.; Sellergren, B.
Determination of phenytoin in plasma by molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction.
J.Chromatogr. A 2001, 939, 31–38.
Suedee, R.; Seechamnanturakit, V.; Canyuk, B.; Ovatiarnporn, C.; Martin, G.P. Temperature
sensitive dopamine-imprinted (N,N-methyle-bis-acrylamide cross-linked) polymer and its
potential application to the selective extraction of adrenergic drugs from urine. J. Chromatogr. A
2006, 1114, 239–249.
Peipei, Q.; Jincheng, W.; Jing, J.; Fan, S.; Jiping, C. 2,4-Dimethylphenol imprinted polymers as a
solid-phase extraction sorbent for class-selective extraction of phenolic compounds from
environmental water. Talanta 2010, 81, 1630–1635.
Caro, E.; Masque, N.; Marce, R.M.; Borrull, F.; Cormack, P.A.G.; Sherrington, D.C. Non-covalent
and semi-covalent molecularly imprinted polymers for selective on-line solid-phase extraction of
4-nitrophenol from water samples. J. Cromatogr. A 2002, 963, 169–178.
Tamayo, F.G.; Casillas, J.L.; Martin-Esteban, A. Highly selective fenuron-imprinted polymer
with a homogeneous binding site distribution prepared by precipitation polymerization and its
application to the clean-up of fenuron in plant samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 482, 165–173.
Le Moullec, S.; Bégos, A.; Pichon, V.; Bellier, B. Selective extraction of organophosphorus
nerve agent degradation products by molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction.
J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1108, 7–13.
Chianella, I.; Piletsky, S.A.; Tothill, I.E.; Chen, B.; Turner, A.P.F. MIP-based solid phase
extraction cartridge combined with mip-based sensor for the detection of microcystil-LR.
Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18, 119–127.
Lai, J.P.; Niessner, R.; Knopp, D. Benzo[a]pyrene imprinted polymers: Synthesis, characterization
and spe application in water and coffee samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 522, 137–144.
Caro, E.; Marce, R.M.; Cormack, P.A.G.; Sherrington, D.C. Borrull, F. Molecularly imprinted
solid-phase extraction of naphthalene sulfonates from water. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1047,
175–180.
Bjarnason, B.; Chimuka, L.; Ramstrom, O. On-line solid phase extraction of triazine herbicides
using a molecularly imprinted polymer for selective sample enrichment. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71,
2152–2156.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5940
113. Turiel, E.; Martin-Esteban, A.; Fernández, P.; Pérez-Conde, C.; Cámara, C. Molecular
recognition in a propazine-imprinted polymer and its application to the determination of triazines
in environmental samples. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 5133–5141.
114. Cacho, C.; Turiel, E.; Martin-Esteban, A.; Ayala, D.; Pérez-Code, C. Semi-covalent imprinted
polymer using propazine methacrylate as template molecule for the clean-up of triazines in soil
vegetable samples. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1114, 255–262.
115. Molinelli, A.; Weiss, R.; Mizaikoff, B. Advances solid phase extraction using molecularly
imprinted polymers for the determination of quercetin in red wine. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002,
50, 1804–1808.
116. Farrington, K.; Magner, E.; Regan, F. Predicting the performance of molecularly imprinted
polymer: Selective extraction of caffeine by molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction. Anal.
Chim. Acta 2006, 566, 60–68.
117. Wang, D.; Hong, S.P.; Row, K.H. Solid extraction of caffeine and theophylline from green tea by
molecular imprinted polymers. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 2004, 21, 853–857.
118. Crescenzi, C.; Bayoudh, S.; Cormack, P.A.; Klein, T.; Ensing, K. Determination of clenbuterol in
bovine liver by combining matrix solid-phase dispersion and molecular imprinted solid-phase
extraction followed by liquid chromatography/electrospray ion trap multiple-stage mass
spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2171–2177.
119. Maier, N.M.; Buttinger, G.; Welhartizki, S.; Gavioli, E.; Linder, W. Molecularly imprinted
polymer-assisted sample clean-up of ochratoxin a from red wine: Merits and limitations.
J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 804, 103–111.
120. Rayane, M.; Mottier, P.; Treguier, L.; Richoz-Payot, J.; Yilmaz, E.; Tabet, J.-C.; Guy, P.A.
Use of molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction sorbent for the determination of four
5-nitroimidazoles and three of their metabolites from egg-based samples before tandem
lc−esims/ms analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 3500–3508.
121. Arthur, C.L.; Pawliszyn, J. Solid phase microextraction with thermal desorption using fused
silica optical fibers. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2145–2148.
122. Hu, X.; Hu, Y.; Li, G. Development of novel molecularly imprinted solid-phase microextraction
fiber and its application for the determination of triazines in complicated samples coupled with
high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1147, 1–9.
123. Prasad, B.B.; Tiwari, K.; Singh, M.; Sharma, P.S.; Patel, A.K.; Srivastava, S. Molecularly
imprinted polymer-based solid-phase microextraction fiber coupled with molecularly imprinted
polymer-based sensor for ultratrace analysis of ascorbic acid. J. Chromatogr. A 2008, 1198–1199,
59–66.
124. Turiel, E.; Tadeo, J.L.; Martín-Esteban, A. Molecularly imprinted polymeric fibers for
solid-phase microextraction. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 3099–3104.
125. Djozan, D.; Ebrahimi, B. Preparation of new solid phase microextraction fiber on the basis of
atrazine-molecular imprinted polymer: Application for GC and GC/MS screening of triazine
herbicides in water, rice and onion. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 616, 152–159.
126. Koster, E.H.; Crescenzi, C.; den Hoedt, W.; Ensing, K.; de Jong, G.J. Fibers coated
with molecularly imprinted polymers for solid-phase microextraction. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73,
3140–3145.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5941
127. Zhu, X.; Cai, J.; Yang, J.; Su, Q.; Gao, Y. Films coated with molecular imprinted polymers for
the selective stir bar sorption extraction of monocrotophos. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1131, 37–44.
128. Zhu, X.; Zhu, Q. Molecular imprinted nylon-6 stir bar as a novel extraction technique for
enantioseparation of amino acids. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 2665–2670.
129. Hu, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zhu, F.; Li, G. Sol-gel coated polydimethylsiloxane/β-Cyclodextrin as novel
stationary phase for stir bar sorptive extraction and its application to analysis of estrogens and
bisphenol A. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1148, 16–22.
130. Baltussen, E.; Sandra, P.; David, F.; Cramers, C. Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), a novel
extraction technique for aqueous samples: Theory and principles. J. Microcolumn Sep. 1999, 11,
737–747.
131. Guo, L.; Guan, M.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, H. Molecularly imprinted matrix solid-phase dispersion for
extraction of chloramphenicol in fish tissues coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography
determination. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 392, 1431–1438.
132. Sun, H.; Qiao, F.; Liu, G.; Liang, S. Simultaneous isolation of six fluoroquinolones in serum
samples by selective molecularly imprinted matrix solid-phase dispersion. Anal. Chim. Acta
2008, 625, 154–159.
133. Javanbakht, M.; Eynollshi Fard, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Abdouss, M.; Ganjali, M.R.; Norouzi, P.;
Safaraliee, L. Molecularly imprinted polymer based potentiometric sensor for the detection of
hydroxyzine in tablets and biological fluids. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 612, 65–74.
134. Henry, O.Y.F.; Piletsky, S.A.; Cullen, D.C. Fabrication of molecularly imprinted polymer
microarray on a chip by mid-infrared laser pulse initiated polymerisation. Biosens. Bioelectron.
2008, 23, 1769–1775.
135. Piletsky, S.A.; Piletska, E.V.; Chen, B.; Karim, K.; Weston, D.; Barrett, G.; Lowe, P.;
Turner, A.P.F. Chemical grafting of molecularly imprinted homopolymers to the surface of
microplates. Application of artificial adrenergic receptor in enzyme-linked assay for β-Agonists
determination. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 4381–4385.
136. Titirici, M.M.; Sellergren, B. Thin molecularly imprinted polymer films via reversible
addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1773–1779.
137. Sode, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Ohta, S.; Tsugawa, W.; Yamazaki, T. A new concept for the
construction of an artificial dehydrogenase for fructosylamine compounds and its application for
an amperometric fructosylamine sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 435, 151–156.
138. Krőger, S.; Turner, A.P.F.; Mosbach, K.; Haupt, K. Imprinted polymer based sensor system for
herbicides using differential-pulse voltammetry on screen printed electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1999,
71, 3698–3702.
139. Kriz, D.; Mosbach, K. Competitive amperometric morphine sensor based on an agarose
immobilised molecularly imprinted polymer. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 300, 71–75.
140. Hedborg, E.; Winquist, F.; Lundstroem, I.; Andersson, L.I.; Mosbach, K. Some studies of
molecularly-imprinted polymer membranes in combination with field-effect devices.
Sens. Actuators A 1993, 37–38, 796–799.
141. Syu, M.J.; Chiu, T.C.; Lai, C.Y.; Chang, Y.S. Amperometric detection of bilirubin from a
micro-sensing electrode with a synthetic bilirubin imprinted poly(MAA-co-EGDMA) film.
Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 22, 550–557.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5942
142. Dickert, F.L.; Forth, P.; Lieberzeit, P.; Tortschanoff, M. Molecular imprinting in chemical
sensing. Detection of aromatic and halogenated hydrocarbons as well as polar solvent vapor.
Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 360, 759–762.
143. Jakusch, M.; Janotta, M.; Mizaikoff, B.; Mosbach, K.; Haupt, K. Molecularly imprinted
polymers and infrared evanescent wave spectroscopy. A chemical sensors approach. Anal. Chem.
1999, 71, 4786–4791.
144. Blanco-Lopez, M.C.; Gutierrez-Fernandez, S.; Lobo-Castanon, M.J.; Miranda-Ordieres, A.J.;
Tunon-Blanco, P. Electrochemical sensing with electrodes modified with molecularly imprinted
polymer films. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 1922–1928.
145. Uludag, Y.; Piletsky, S.A.; Turner, A.P.F.; Cooper, M.A. Piezoelectric sensors based on molecular
imprinted polymers for detection of low molecular mass analytes. FEBS J. 2007, 274, 5471–5480.
146. Dickert, F.L.; Hayden, O. Molecular imprinting in chemical sensing. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem.
1999, 18, 192–199.
147. Percival, C.J.; Stanley, S.; Braithwaite, A.; Newton, M.I.; McHale, G. Molecular imprinted
coated QCM for the detection of nandrolone. Analyst 2002, 127, 1024–1026.
148. Peng, H.; Liang, C.; Zhou, A.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, Q.; Yao, S. Development of a new atropine
sulfate bulk acoustic wave sensor based on a molecularly imprinted electrosynthesized
copolymer of aniline with O-Phenylenediamine. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 423, 221–228.
149. Feng, L.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Hu, J. Biosensor for the detection of sorbitol based on molecularly
imprinted electro synthesized polymers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 1513–1519.
150. Tan, Y.; Yin, J.; Liang, C.; Peng, H.; Nie, L.; Yao, S. A study of a new tsm bio-mimetic sensor
using a molecularly imprinted polymer coating and its application for the determination of
nicotine in human serum and urine. Bioelectrochemistry 2001, 53, 141–148.
151. Tan, Y.G.; Zhou, Z.L.; Wang, P.; Nie, L.H.; Yao, S.Z. A study of a bio-mimetic recognition
material for the BAW sensor by molecular imprinting and its application for the determination of
paracetamol in the human serum and urine. Talanta 2001, 55, 337–347.
152. Ersőz, A.; Ditemiz, S.E.; Őzcan, A.A.; Denizli, A.; Say, R. Synergie between molecular
imprinted polymer based on solid-phase extraction and quartz crystal microbalance technique for
8-OHdG sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24, 742–747.
153. Tsuruoka, M.; Yano, K.; Ikebukuro, K.; McNiven, S.; Takeuchi, T.; Karube, I. Rapid detection
of complementary- and mismatched DNA sequences using fluorescence polarization. Anal Lett.
1996, 29, 1741–1749.
153. Hirayama, K.; Sakai, Y.; Kameoka, K.; Noda, K.; Naganawa, R. Preparation of a sensor
device with specific recognition sites for acetaldehyde by molecular imprinting technique.
Sens. Actuators B 2002, 86, 20–25.
154. Percival, C.J.; Stanley, S.; Galle, M.; Braithwaite, A.; Newton, M.I.; McHale, G.; Hayes, W.
Molecular-imprinted, polymer-coated quartz crystal microbalances for the detection of terpenes.
Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 4225–4228.
155. Haupt, K.; Noworyta, K.; Kutner, W. Imprinted polymer-based enantioselective acoustic sensor
using a quartz crystal microbalance. Anal. Commun. 1999, 36, 391–393.
156. Stanley, S.; Percival, C.J.; Morel, T.; Braithwaite, A.; Newton, M.I.; McHale, G.; Hayes, W.
Enantioselective detection of L-Serine. Sens. Actuators B 2003, 89, 103–106.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5943
157. Dickert, F.L.; Hayden, O. Bioimprint of polymer and sol-gel phases. Selective detection of yeasts
with imprinted polymers. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 1302–1306.
158. Hayden, O.; Bindeus, R.; Haderspőck, C.; Mann, K.J.; Wirl, B.; Dickert, F.L. Mass-sensitive
detection of cells viruses and enzymes with artificial receptors. Sens. Actuators B 2003, 91,
316–319.
159. Dickert, F.L.; Hayden, O.; Bindeus, R.; Mann, K.J.; Blaas, D.; Waigmann, E. Bioimprinted
QCM sensors for virus detection-screening of plant sap. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378,
1929–1934.
160. Vlatakis, G.; Andersson, L.I.; Muller, R.; Mosbach, K. Drug assay using antibody mimics made
by molecular imprinting. Nature 1993, 361, 645–647.
161. Ye, L.; Surugiu, I.; Haupt, K. Scintillation proximity assay using molecularly imprinted
microspheres. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 959–964.
162. Benito-Peña, E.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C.; Aparicio, S.; Orellana, G.; Cederfur, J.; Kempe, M.
Molecular engineering of fluorescent penicillins for molecularly imprinted polymer assays.
Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2019–2027.
163. Lu, C.-H.; Zhou, W.-H.; Han, B.; Yang, H.-H.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.-R. Surface-imprinted
core-shell nanoparticles for sorbent assays. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5457–5461.
164. Hunt, C.E.; Pasetto, P.; Ansell, R.J.; Haupt, K. A fluorescence polarisation molecular imprint
sorbent assay for 2,4-D: A non-separation pseudo-immunoassay. Chem. Commun. 2006, 16,
1754–1756.
165. Navarro-Villoslada, F.; Urraca, J.L.; Moreno-Bondi, M.C.; Orellana, G. Zearalenone sensing
with molecularly imprinted polymers and tailored fluorescent probes. Sens. Actuators B 2007,
121, 67–73.
166. Shokat, K.M.; Leumann, C.; Sugasawara, R.; Schultz, P.G. A new strategy for the generation of
catalytic antibodies. Nature 1989, 338, 269–271.
167. Kandimalla, V.B.; Ju, H. Molecular imprinting: A dynamic technique for diverse applications in
analytical chemistry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 380, 587–605.
168. Whitcombe, M.J. MIP catalysts: From theory to practice. In Molecular Imprinting of Polymers;
Piletsky, S., Turner, A.P.F., Eds.; Landes Bioscience: Austin, TX, USA, 2006; Chapter 9.
169. Leonhardt, A.; Mosbach, K. Enzyme-mimicking polymers exhibiting specific substrate binding
and catalytic functions. React. Polym. 1987, 6, 285–641.
170. Beach, J.V.; Shea, K.J. Designed catalysts. A synthetic network polymer that catalyzes the
dehydrofluorination of 4-fluoro-4-(p-nitrophenyl)butan-2-one. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994. 116,
379–380.
171. Wulff, G. Model of the binding sites of enzymes: Template induced preparation of specific
binding sites in crosslinked polymers. Adv. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996, 15, 639–649.
172. Li, S.; Ge, Y.; Turner, A.P.F. A catalytic and positively thermosensitive molecularly imprinted
polymer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 1194–1200.
173. Li, S.; Ge, Y.; Tiwari, A.; Wang, S.; Turner, A.P.F.; Piletsky, S.A. ‘On/Off’-switchable catalysis
by a smart enzyme-like imprinted polymer. J. Catal. 2011, 278, 173–180.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5944
174. Tong, K.; Xiao, S.; Li, S.; Wang, J. Molecular recognition and catalysis by molecularly
imprinted polymer catalysts: Thermodynamic and kinetic surveys on the specific behaviors.
J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2008, 18, 426–433.
175. Sellergren, B.; Allender, C.J. Molecularly imprinted polymers: A bridge to advanced drug
delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1733–1741.
176. Cunliffe, D.; Kirby, A.; Alexander, C. Molecularly imprinted drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug
Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1836–1853.
177. Chien, Y.W.; Lin, S. Optimisation of treatment by applying programmable rate-controlled drug
delivery technology. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2002, 41, 1267–1299.
178. Allender, C.J.; Brain, K.R.; Heard, C.M. Progress in Medical Chemistry; King, F.D., Ed.;
Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Volume 36, p. 235.
179. Alvarez-Lorenzo, C.; Concheiro, A. Molecularly imprinted polymers for drug delivery.
J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 804, 231–245.
180. Aydin, O.; Attila, G.; Dogan, A.; Aydin, M.V.; Canacankatan, N.; Kanik, A. The effects of
methyl methacrylate on nasal cavity, lung and antioxidant system (an experimental inhalation
study). Toxicol. Pathol. 2002, 30, 350–356.
181. Striegler, S. Carbohydrate recognition in cross-linked sugar-templated poly(acrylates).
Macromolecules 2003, 36, 1310–1317.
182. Spizzirri, U.G.; Peppas, N.A. Structural analysis and diffusional behavior of molecularly
imprinted polymer networks for cholesterol recognition. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6719–6727.
183. Hilt, J.Z.; Byrne, M.E. Configurational biomimesis in drug delivery: Molecular imprinting of
biologically significant molecules. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004, 56, 1599–1620.
184. Norell, M.C.; Andersson, H.S.; Nicholls, I.A. Theophylline molecularly imprinted polymer
dissociation kinetics: A novel sustained release drug dosage mechanism. J. Mol. Recog. 1998, 11,
98–102.
185. Allender, C.J.; Richardson, C.; Woodhouse, B.; Heard, C.M.; Brain, K.R. Pharmaceutical
applications for molecularly imprinted polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 2000, 195, 39–43.
186. Cai, W.; Gupta, R.B. Molecular-imprinted polymers selective for tetracycline binding. Sep. Purif.
Technol. 2004, 35, 215–221.
187. Puoci, F.; Iemma, F.; Muzzalupo, R.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Trombino, S.; Cassano, R.; Picci, N.
Spherical molecularly imprinted polymers via a novel precipitation polymerization in the
controlled delivery of sulfasalazine. Macromol. Biosci. 2004, 4, 22–26.
188. Del Sole, R.; Lazzoi, M.R.; Vasapollo, G. Synthesis of nicotinamide-based molecularly
imprinted microspheres and in vitro controlled release studies. Drug Deliv. 2010, 17, 1–8.
189. Sreenivasan, K. On the Application of molecularly imprinted poly(HEMA) as a template
responsive release system. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1999, 71, 1819–1821.
190. Davidson, L.; Hayes, W. Molecular imprinting of biologically active steroidal systems.
Curr. Organic. Chem. 2002, 6, 265–281.
191. Sellergren, B.; Wieschemeyer, J.; Boos, K.; Seidel, D. Imprinted polymers for selective
adsorption of cholesterol from gastrointestinal fluids. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 4037–4046.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12
5945
192. Huval, C.C.; Chen, X.; Holmes-Farley, S.R.; Mandeville, W.H.; Polomoscanik, S.C.;
Sacchiero, R.J.; Dhal, P.K. Molecularly imprinted bile acid sequestrants: Synthesis and
biological studies. In Molecularly Imprinted Materials, 1st ed.; Kofinas, B., Sellergreen, B.,
Roberts, M.J., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; Volume 787, pp. 85–90.
193. Hoshino, Y.; Koide, H.; Urakami, T.; Kanazawa, H.; Kodama, T.; Oku, N.; Shea, K.J.
Recognition, neutralization, and clearance of target peptides in the bloodstream of living mice by
molecularly imprinted polymer nanoparticles: A plastic antibody. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
6644–6645.
© 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).